Notes accompany this presentation. Please select Notes Page view.
These materials can be reproduced only with written approval from Gartner. Such approvals must be requested via e-mail: [email protected]. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates.
Gartner:
The Broken State of Backup
Dave Russell
Backup/Recovery Isn’t What It Used to Be
There is no "off" switch for data anymore
ON
ON
Requirements and technology have
evolved. Organizations should expect
to fundamentally change their
Increasing Pressure on Backup/Recovery
Recovery • User error • Application error • Malware • Hardware failures • DisastersROBO, PC & Laptop Backup Compliance Pricing Availability Demands 95% 98% 99.5% 99.9% Availability Cost VM Backup W A N
• Stickiness is a thing of the past as backup products are now swapped out, in part due to lower retention periods for data
• Backup Re-architecture is taking place today and will continue for at least another 12 months and probably longer
• Simplicity is a meaningful differentiator as powerful solutions are only interesting if they can be deployed and managed effectively
• Server Virtualization is a change event that causes organizations to consider deploying new / different backup solutions
• Bigger Isn’t Always Better as McDonalds sells a lot of hamburgers but is rarely accused of having the best food
Top Selling Thoughts
The Implications
The backup and recovery approaches of the past no longer suffice in meeting the current, much less the future, organizational recovery requirements.
Today, Backup/Recovery Is Broken
Common Issues
Too much faith in backups
Lack of consistent testing and verification
Backup failures
Poor, incomplete backups
Too many incremental backups
Too many ‘events’ trigger a backup
Operator/user error
Hardware and software failures
Age and deterioration of media
Backup Success Rates Are Not Acceptable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Best-in-Class Data Center Average Data Center Best-in-Class Remote Office Average Remote OfficeStrategic Planning Assumption: Through 2010, improvements in backup success rates will be the No. 1 driver for disk based recovery implementations.
Managing the Total Cost of Backup
Capital Expenditure
Operating Expenditure
Has or Will Your Organization Done / Will Do
A Major Backup/Recovery Redesign?
Don't know 6% No 46% Yes 48% No 47% Yes 53%
All Giants, No Dwarves?
•
The largest vendors
have dominated the
storage landscape.
•
In recent years, some
critical innovations have
come from smaller vendors
at the periphery, not larger
vendors at the core.
•
Will the legacy "giants"
consume the emerging
"dwarves?“
Many Ways To Spend the Data
Protection Dollar
CDP & Replication S/W
Array-based Replication
NAS & Clustered File Systems
Imaging & VMware-Focused
What Should Backup/Recovery Products Do?
1. Unified & Holistic2. Completely Integrated 3. Non-Invasive
4. Efficient
5. Scale Up & Down
Successfully backup! Successfully restore!
Restore “instantly” for fast access to data Be more intuitive, easier to use
Be easier to manage and upgrade Be holistic
Data Protection in 2014
• Unified Recovery Management- One pane of glass for control - In-house
- Cloud
• Tiered Recovery
- Tape
- D2D & VTLs
- Space efficient snapshots - Remote replication
• Disaster Recovery
- Tape -> Replication for offsite vaulting - Cloud / SaaS
• Backup Beyond the Data Center
- Laptop & Desktop Backup - ROBO Backup
• Encryption comes of age
New Recovery Approaches Are Emerging
Backup
Snapshot
Replication
CDP
Tape or disk Cataloged Time-based Block or file Local or remote Logical and physical
No sense of time Sync or async Local or remote Physical only Time-based Block or file Local or remote
10%
6%
12%
5%
67%
Which answer best describes your production
usage of Continuous Data Protection (CDP):
Currently using near-CDP today
Currently using true-CDP today
Plan to implement near-CDP in the next 12 months
Plan to implement true-CDP in the next 12 months9%
7%
53%
20%
11%
What are your plans for use of data
deduplication technology for backup?
Am currently using data deduplication in software or hardware for all or most backup activities
Am currently using data deduplication in software or hardware for some backup activities
Plan to deploy data deduplication within the next 12 months
Plan to deploy data deduplication some time beyond 12 monthsDifferentiated SLAs ->
Tiered Recovery Services
RTO
/
RPO
Cost
$$$$
$$$
$$
$
Data Protection Techniques
C
backup client tape offsite tape
vault
C
application agent & backup client
A
disk or VTL
tape offsite tape vault
A S
application agent &
snapshot de-duplicated disk or VTL
disk or tape retention
A R R
S
The Future of Backup/Recovery:
Unified Recovery Management
Backup/Restore Manager Console Host-Based Snapshot NAS With NDMP Tape Libraries Intelligent Storage Remote Office Tape Libraries Intelligent Storage JBOD/SATA Disk Intelligent Switch/ Block CDP/ Virtualization Appliance Backup Server Image Backup File Backup Remote Site or Cloud Vendor Application Backup
Is There a False Sense of Security of What
You Can Recover?
Outcome of the Last Exercise
10% 6% 8% 9% 7% 11% 9% 10% 10% 11% 18% 15% 30% 31% 28% 29% 28% 35% 35% 37% 39% 36% 31% 28% 15% 17% 16% 15% 17% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Disaster Recovery Work area/ Workforce Continuity Business Resumption Contingency Planning Emergency/ Incident Management Restoration
Exercise was cancelled, problems couldn't be resolved Exercise went OK, but significant problems
Exercise went well with problems
The exercise was fully successful. All service levels were met Not sure
Exercising
DR plans is
the
second-most-critical
aspect of the
DR process
(conducting a BIA is the first)and the
aspect most
Recommendations
Investigate new technologies for applicability in your
backup/recovery infrastructure
- These might not come from traditional backup vendors
Strategically select vendors with a long-term vision for recovery-
D2D2C, CDP, Deduplication-
Recovery Manager (manager of managers)
Implement tiered recovery
- Build multilayered SLAs for backup & recovery