• No results found

Gartner: The Broken State of Backup

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Gartner: The Broken State of Backup"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Notes accompany this presentation. Please select Notes Page view.

These materials can be reproduced only with written approval from Gartner. Such approvals must be requested via e-mail: [email protected]. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates.

Gartner:

The Broken State of Backup

Dave Russell

(2)

Backup/Recovery Isn’t What It Used to Be

There is no "off" switch for data anymore

ON

ON

Requirements and technology have

evolved. Organizations should expect

to fundamentally change their

(3)

Increasing Pressure on Backup/Recovery

Recovery • User error • Application error • Malware • Hardware failures • Disasters

ROBO, PC & Laptop Backup Compliance Pricing Availability Demands 95% 98% 99.5% 99.9% Availability Cost VM Backup W A N

(4)

Stickiness is a thing of the past as backup products are now swapped out, in part due to lower retention periods for data

Backup Re-architecture is taking place today and will continue for at least another 12 months and probably longer

Simplicity is a meaningful differentiator as powerful solutions are only interesting if they can be deployed and managed effectively

Server Virtualization is a change event that causes organizations to consider deploying new / different backup solutions

Bigger Isn’t Always Better as McDonalds sells a lot of hamburgers but is rarely accused of having the best food 

Top Selling Thoughts

The Implications

The backup and recovery approaches of the past no longer suffice in meeting the current, much less the future, organizational recovery requirements.

(5)

Today, Backup/Recovery Is Broken

Common Issues

 Too much faith in backups

 Lack of consistent testing and verification

 Backup failures

 Poor, incomplete backups

 Too many incremental backups

 Too many ‘events’ trigger a backup

 Operator/user error

 Hardware and software failures

 Age and deterioration of media

(6)

Backup Success Rates Are Not Acceptable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Best-in-Class Data Center Average Data Center Best-in-Class Remote Office Average Remote Office

Strategic Planning Assumption: Through 2010, improvements in backup success rates will be the No. 1 driver for disk based recovery implementations.

(7)

Managing the Total Cost of Backup

Capital Expenditure

Operating Expenditure

(8)

Has or Will Your Organization Done / Will Do

A Major Backup/Recovery Redesign?

Don't know 6% No 46% Yes 48% No 47% Yes 53%

(9)

All Giants, No Dwarves?

The largest vendors

have dominated the

storage landscape.

In recent years, some

critical innovations have

come from smaller vendors

at the periphery, not larger

vendors at the core.

Will the legacy "giants"

consume the emerging

"dwarves?“

(10)

Many Ways To Spend the Data

Protection Dollar

CDP & Replication S/W

Array-based Replication

NAS & Clustered File Systems

Imaging & VMware-Focused

(11)

What Should Backup/Recovery Products Do?

1. Unified & Holistic

2. Completely Integrated 3. Non-Invasive

4. Efficient

5. Scale Up & Down

 Successfully backup!  Successfully restore!

 Restore “instantly” for fast access to data  Be more intuitive, easier to use

 Be easier to manage and upgrade  Be holistic

(12)

Data Protection in 2014

Unified Recovery Management

- One pane of glass for control - In-house

- Cloud

Tiered Recovery

- Tape

- D2D & VTLs

- Space efficient snapshots - Remote replication

Disaster Recovery

- Tape -> Replication for offsite vaulting - Cloud / SaaS

Backup Beyond the Data Center

- Laptop & Desktop Backup - ROBO Backup

Encryption comes of age

(13)

New Recovery Approaches Are Emerging

Backup

Snapshot

Replication

CDP

Tape or diskCatalogedTime-basedBlock or fileLocal or remote

Logical and physical

 No sense of time  Sync or async  Local or remote  Physical only  Time-based  Block or file  Local or remote

(14)

10%

6%

12%

5%

67%

Which answer best describes your production

usage of Continuous Data Protection (CDP):

Currently using near-CDP today

Currently using true-CDP today

Plan to implement near-CDP in the next 12 months

Plan to implement true-CDP in the next 12 months

(15)

9%

7%

53%

20%

11%

What are your plans for use of data

deduplication technology for backup?

Am currently using data deduplication in software or hardware for all or most backup activities

Am currently using data deduplication in software or hardware for some backup activities

Plan to deploy data deduplication within the next 12 months

Plan to deploy data deduplication some time beyond 12 months

(16)

Differentiated SLAs ->

Tiered Recovery Services

RTO

/

RPO

Cost

$$$$

$$$

$$

$

Data Protection Techniques

C

backup client tape offsite tape

vault

C

application agent & backup client

A

disk or VTL

tape offsite tape vault

A S

application agent &

snapshot de-duplicated disk or VTL

disk or tape retention

A R R

S

(17)

The Future of Backup/Recovery:

Unified Recovery Management

Backup/Restore Manager Console Host-Based Snapshot NAS With NDMP Tape Libraries Intelligent Storage Remote Office Tape Libraries Intelligent Storage JBOD/SATA Disk Intelligent Switch/ Block CDP/ Virtualization Appliance Backup Server Image Backup File Backup Remote Site or Cloud Vendor Application Backup

(18)

Is There a False Sense of Security of What

You Can Recover?

Outcome of the Last Exercise

10% 6% 8% 9% 7% 11% 9% 10% 10% 11% 18% 15% 30% 31% 28% 29% 28% 35% 35% 37% 39% 36% 31% 28% 15% 17% 16% 15% 17% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Disaster Recovery Work area/ Workforce Continuity Business Resumption Contingency Planning Emergency/ Incident Management Restoration

Exercise was cancelled, problems couldn't be resolved Exercise went OK, but significant problems

Exercise went well with problems

The exercise was fully successful. All service levels were met Not sure

Exercising

DR plans is

the

second-most-critical

aspect of the

DR process

(conducting a BIA is the first)

and the

aspect most

(19)

Recommendations

Investigate new technologies for applicability in your

backup/recovery infrastructure

- These might not come from traditional backup vendors

Strategically select vendors with a long-term vision for recovery

-

D2D2C, CDP, Deduplication

-

Recovery Manager (manager of managers)

Implement tiered recovery

- Build multilayered SLAs for backup & recovery

Do regular testing to ensure that your

(20)

References

Related documents

For NDMP NAS Option to be able to perform backup and restore operations on EMC CLARiiON IP4700 NAS servers, at least one server in the configuration must have tape drives or

For NDMP NAS Option to be able to perform backup and restore operations on EMC CLARiiON IP4700 NAS servers, at least one server in the configuration must have tape drives or

For NDMP NAS Option to be able to perform backup and restore operations on EMC CLARiiON IP4700 NAS servers, at least one server in the configuration must have tape drives or

If you use the backup to Media Manager storage units (remote NDMP), the data travels over the network by going from an NDMP host to a Media Manager-type storage device that is

Quantum offers D2D2T backup solutions using high performance virtual tape libraries (DX Series), disk based backup solutions with patented data de-duplication and remote

storage Backup/ media server Onsite Retention Storage Offsite Disaster Recovery Storage Retention/ Restore Replication DR Backup Archive to tape As required WAN. •

Tivoli Storage Manager integration provides very efficient and extremely fast backup and restore processes, and policy-driven migration of files to an external disk or tape based..

This section provides up-to-date information on the NAS devices supported by the NetVault Backup Plug-in for NDMP, Plug-in for SnapMirror to Tape, and Plug-in for SnapShot