A Study on Maximum Power Point Tracking Solar Charge Controller

I

nternational

J

ournal of

A

dvanced

R

esearch in

E

lectrical,

E

lectronics and

I

nstrumentation

E

ngineering

(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

Website: www.ijareeie.com

Vol. 8, Issue 3, March 2019

A Study on Maximum Power Point Tracking

Solar Charge Controller

Dr.Himani Goyal Sharma

, Prateek Kumar Meena

Professor, Dept. of EE, Senior member IEEE, Poornima College of Engineering, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India1

UG Student, Dept. of EE, Poornima College of Engineering, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India2

ABSTRACT:-Worldwide interest for power is expanding while generation of energy from petroleum derivatives is declining and in this manner the undeniable decision of the perfect energy source that is inexhaustible and could give security to advancement future is energy from the sun. As of late ithere has been a developing consideration itowards utilization iof solar energy. The principle points of interest of iPhotovoltaic systems utilized for tackling isolar energy are iabsence of greenhouse gas emission, low maintenance cost, concerning site of establishment and, mechanical commotion emerging from moving parts. Photovoltaic energy is a standout amongst the most critical energy sources since it is spotless and limitless. It is critical to work PV energy transformation systems in the maximum power point (MPP) to boost the yield energy of PV clusters. A MPPT control is important to extricate maximum power from the PV exhibits. As of late, an extensive number of procedures have been proposed for tracking the maximum power point. This review paper propose assortment and executed of MPPT techniques.

KEYWORDS: MPPT, Photovoltaic system, PV array, solar energy

I.INTRODUCTION

The constant iincrement in the dimension of greenhouse igas emission and the move in fuel cost are the primary main thrusts behind endeavors to use different sources of renewable energy. Among renewable wellsprings of energy, solar energy establishes a reasonable decision for an assortment of utilizations principally because of the likelihood of direct change of this type ienergy to electrical energy utilizing PV systems as an elective wellsprings of energy required a significant measures of ventures. So as to decrease the general expense of PV system, in this way, iextraction of the most extreme ipower from aisolar cell ends up being an essential thought for optimal isystemidesign. At the fitting working ipoint for iaisolar cell, expecting a given icell effectiveness, the imost extreme yield control relies upon the radiation iintensity, ambient temperature and load impedance. Accomplishment of igreatest power include iload-line changes iunderivarieties in iirradiationilevel and itemperature. The imaximum power ipointitracking, iMPPTinot just empowers an expansion in the ipower conveyed from the iPV module to ithe heap, yet additionally improves the working lifetime of the PV framework. An assortment of MPPT techniques have been created and executed. These strategy can be separated dependent on different highlights iincluding the sorts of isensorsirequired, iunion speed, cost, and scope of adequacy, iusageiequipmentiprerequisites, and popularity.

II.MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING

I

nternational

J

ournal of

A

dvanced

R

esearch in

E

lectrical,

E

lectronics and

I

nstrumentation

E

ngineering

(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

Website: www.ijareeie.com

Vol. 8, Issue 3, March 2019

smaller scale inverters are conveyed, one for each PV panel. This purportedly builds PV solar effectiveness by up to 20%. New iMPPTipreparediclaim to ifameiinverters currently iexist that iserve three icapacities: grid associating wind ipower just as PV, and fanning out power ifor batteryi charging.

This ipaper is iabout the study iofiMPPTiconcerns with PV solar andassortment of MPPT techniques have been proposed and executed. iSolar cells have an intricate relationship among itemperature and overall resistance ithat delivers a non-linear yield iefficiency which can be dissected dependent on the iI-V curve as appeared in ifigure 1. It is the ireason for the MPPT system to test the yield of the iPVicells and iapply the correct iresistancei (load) to iobtainimaximumipowerifor some random ienvironmentaliconditions. iMPPis the result of the MPP ivoltagei(Vmpp) iandiMPPicurrenti(Impp).

I

nternational

J

ournal of

A

dvanced

R

esearch in

E

lectrical,

E

lectronics and

I

nstrumentation

E

ngineering

(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

Website: www.ijareeie.com

Vol. 8, Issue 3, March 2019

iIt is obviously demonstrates ithat when we use iMPPTiwith the iPVisystem, the ipoweriextractioniefficiencyiincrease to 97%. The investigation of developing aiPVicharging system for li-ion batteries by integrating iMPPT and icharging control ifor the ibattery is ireviewed.

III.DIFFERENT MPPT TECHNIQUES

iThereiareidifferentitechniquesiused to itrackiMaximumiPoweriPoint. Some iof the ipopularitechniques are:

1. iPerturb and iobserve

2. iIncremental conductance method

3. iFractionalishort circuit icurrent 4. iFractionaliopen circuit voltage

5. iNeural network

6. iFuzzyillogic

Incremental Conductance (INC) Based MPPT Techniques

The strategies are proposed to get MPP working point for a versatile voltage step changes dependent on the incline of the PV curve. To get changes in voltage step an incentive from the PV curve speeding up and deceleration factors are connected in the following cycle steps. The versatile voltage step change empowers the PV framework to rapidly follow the earth condition varieties. Along these lines progressively sun powered vitality can be collected from the PV vitality frameworks. It is anything but difficult to actualize since it doesn't require information of I-V qualities of explicit PV boards and the parameters are anything but difficult to tune. The MPP is followed via looking through the pinnacle of the P-V curve. This calculation utilizes the prompt conductance I/V and dI/dV for MPPT. Utilizing these two qualities, the calculation decides the area of the working purpose of the PV module in the P-V curve demonstrating that the photovoltaic module works at the MPP alongside left and right sides of the MPP in the P-V curve.

iPerturb and iObserve

iPerturb and observe also known as hill climbing imethod is the ieasiestistrategy. We iutilize just a single isensor, that is the ivoltageisensor, to idetect the iPViarray voltage thus the expense of execution is less and isubsequentlyisimple to iactualize. The itimeiunpredictability of ithisicalculation is iless yet on iachieving near the iMPP it doesn't stop at the iMPP and icontinues perturbing on both the bearings. At the ipoint when this happens the algorithm has iachievedinear the MPP and we can set an appropriate limit or ican utilize a hold up function which winds up iexpanding the time multifaceted nature of the icalculation.

iHowever the strategy does not assess the fast idifference in iirradiationilevel (because of which iMPPT changes) and iconsiders it as a change in iMPPibecause of iperturbation and winds up computing the iwrong MPP. To keep away ifromithis issue we can iutilizeiincrementaliconductance technique.

Fractional ishorticircuiticurrent

Fractional iISC results from the way that, under changing iairiconditions, IMPP is roughly iidentified with the iISC of the PV array.

IMPP =ik2 Isc

I

nternational

J

ournal of

A

dvanced

R

esearch in

E

lectrical,

E

lectronics and

I

nstrumentation

E

ngineering

(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

Website: www.ijareeie.com

Vol. 8, Issue 3, March 2019

Fractional open circuit voltage

iThe close straight connection among VMPP and VOC iof the PV array, under changing irradiance and itemperature

levels, has offered ascend to the ifragmentary VOC technique. VMPP = ik1 Voc

iWhere k1 is a consistent of proportionality. Since k1 iis reliant on the qualities of the PV array being iutilized, it is usually must be registered previously by iexperimentally deciding VMPP and VOC for the iparticular PV array at various irradiance and itemperature levels. The factor ik1 has been accounted ifor to be somewhere in the range of 0.71 and 0.78. iOnce k1 is known, VMPP can be figured with VOC iestimated occasionally by immediately closing down ithe power converter. Be that as it may, this causes aifew impediments, including transitory loss of iintensity.

Neural networks

iAnother system iofiactualizing MPPT which are ilikewise all around adjusted for imicrocontrollers is ineural networks. Neural inetworks generally ihaveithree layers: input, covered up, and yield ilayers. The inumber hubs in each ilayer shift and are client isubordinate. The information factors can be PV array iparameters like iVOC and iISC, air information like iirradiance and itemperature, or any blend of these. The iyield is normally one or a few ireferenceisignals like ian obligation cycle flag used to drive the ipowericonverter to work at or near the iMPP

Fuzzy logic controller

This framework executes the ifuzzyilogicicontrol in ithree phases: 1fuzzification, basic leadership, and idefuzzification. Amid 1fuzzification, fresh information factors are changed over into etymological factors dependent on a membership function. In the basic leadership arrange, the standards which are indicated by a lot of IF– THEN articulations characterize the controller conduct. The standards portraying this phase of activity are communicated as phonetic factors spoken to by ifuzzy sets. In the defuzzification organize, the fuzzy logic controller yield is changed over from a semantic variable to a numerical variable as yet utilizing aimembership function. This gives a simple flag that will icontrol the power converter and drive the working point to the MPP. The fuzzy logic controller inputs are generally a mistake E and an adjustment in blunder, E related with a few distinct factors. Specifically, so as to follow MPP, the mistake is processed based on irradiance and temperature or quick qualities, for example, power and voltage. The yield flag is either the obligation cycle itself, or VMPP and IMPP from which the obligation cycle can be created. Fuzzy logic controllers offer the accompanying favorable circumstances: capacity of working with uncertain data sources, absence of prerequisite of a precise mathematical model, capacity to deal with nonlinearity quick intermingling. In any case, the learning capacity and precision accomplished by the guess rely upon the quantity of the fuzzy dimensions and the type of the membership functions. In most fuzzy frameworks, the membership function related with fuzzification and defuzzification, just as the precursor and the resulting fuzzy guidelines are resolved dependent on experimentation, which can be tedious.

IV.CONCLUSION

There are several strategies for Maximum Power Point Tracking such as Perturb and Observe, Incremental conductance, Fractional short circuit current, fractional open circuit voltage, Neural Network Control, Fuzzy Logic control and so on. Among this techniques Perturb and Observe and Incremental conductance are most ordinarily utilized as result of their basic execution, lesser time to utilize MPP and a few other financial reasons. The efficiency of the circuit is increased by 20-25% when a MPPT solar charge controller is used in contrast with traditional charge controller.

REFERENCES

I

nternational

J

ournal of

A

dvanced

R

esearch in

E

lectrical,

E

lectronics and

I

nstrumentation

E

ngineering

(A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal)

Website: www.ijareeie.com

Vol. 8, Issue 3, March 2019

[3] D. K. Sharma, Purohit G “Advanced Perturbation and Observation (P&O) based Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) of a Solar PhotoVoltaic System”2012 5TH International Conference on Power Electronics

[4] Ali Chermitti, Omar Boukli-Hacene, Bencherif Mohamed “Improvement of the “Perturb and Observe” MPPT Algorithm in a Phot’ovoltaic System under Rapidly Changing Climatic Conditions” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 56– No.12, October 2012

[5] Yi-HwaLiu,Rong-CengLeou ,Jeng-Shiung Cheng “Design and Implementation of a Maximum Power Point Tracking Battery Charging System for Photovoltaic Applications”power tech, 2012 russia.

[6] R. Faranda and S. Leva, "Energy comparison of MPPT techniques for PV Systems", WSEAS Trans. on Power Systems, Vol.3, No.6, June 2008, pp. 446-455.

[7] T. Esram, and P.L. Chapman, “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques”, IEEE Trans. Energy Conv., Vol.22, No.2, June 2007, pp.439-449.

[8] J. Poortmans, V. Arkhipov, “Thin Film Solar Cells-Fabrication, Characterization and Applications”, Wiley, Nov. 2006 ISBN:0470091266. [9] N.Kasa, T.lida and H.lwamoto, “Maximum power point tracking with capacitor identifier for photovoltaic power system”

[10] I. Glasner, J. Appelbaum, “Advantage of boost vs. buck topology for maximum power point tracker in photovoltaic systems”,