• No results found

MTAT Software Engineering Management

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "MTAT Software Engineering Management"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

MTAT.03.243

Software Engineering Management

Lecture 01:

Course Introduction

(2)

Structure of Lecture 01

•  Clarification of Course Focus

•  Exercise 1

•  Homework 1

(3)

Software Engineering Management

Consistent  applica-on  of  

engineering  principles  and  

methods  to  the  development  

of  so5ware  (intensive)  systems  

Engineering  Principles:  

Applica-on  of  systema-c  (i.e.,  predictable,  repeatable,  scalable)  procedures   -­‐  with  well-­‐defined  goals  (e.g.,  quality,  func-onality/scope,  cost,  -me)  

(4)

Software Engineering Management

Consistent  applica-on  of  

engineering  principles  and  

methods  to  the  development  

of  so5ware  (intensive)  systems  

Engineering  Principles:  

Applica-on  of  systema-c  (i.e.,  predictable,  repeatable,  scalable)  procedures   -­‐  with  well-­‐defined  goals  (e.g.,  quality,  func-onality/scope,  cost,  -me)  

-­‐  with  well-­‐defined/structured  products,  processes,  and  organiza-on   Adherence  to  exis-ng  body  of  knowledge  

Observa-on  of  constraints  (standards,  -me/cost/quality  requirements,  etc.)  

Planning  –  deciding  what  is  to  be  done   Organizing  –  making  arrangements  

Staffing  –  selec-ng  the  right  people  for  the  job   Direc-ng  –  giving  instruc-ons  

Monitoring  –  checking  on  progress  

Controlling  –  taking  ac-on  to  remedy  hold-­‐ups  

Innova-ng  –  finding    solu-ons  when  problems  emerge   Represen-ng  –  liaising  with  clients,  users,  developers  and   other  stakeholders  

(5)

The Three Ps in Software Projects

•  Software

development

happens in

projects

       

Project

 

 

P  ?

   

P  ?  

P  ?  

 

(6)

The Three Ps in Software Projects

•  Products

•  People

•  Processes

       

Project

 

Products   People   Processes  

(7)

The Three Ps in Software Projects

•  Processes

help manage

products and

people

       

Project

 

Products   People   Processes  

(8)

Process Taxonomy

H.  Dieter  Rombach,  Mar-n  Verlage,  Direc-ons   in  So5ware  Process  Research,  Advances  in   Computers,  Volume  41,  Marvin  V.  Zelkowitz   (Ed.),  Pages  1-­‐63,  Academic  Press,  Boston,  MA,   1995.  

A  Process  …  

…  defines  

Who

 does  

What

,  

When

 

and  

How  

to  reach  a  specific  goal.  

In  so5ware  engineering  the  goal  is  

to  build  a  so5ware  product  or  to  

enhance  an  exis-ng  one  

(9)

Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA): A systematic approach

to Software Process Improvement (SPI)

  PLAN

what you want to accomplish

over a period of time and what you

might do, or need to do, to get there

  DO

what you planned to do

  CHECK

the results of what you did

to see if the objective was achieved

  ACT

on the information –

standardize or plan for further

improvement

(10)

Structure of Lecture 01

•  Clarification of Course Focus

•  Exercise 1

•  Homework 1

(11)

λ Tasks:

•  Form groups of two (or three) students •  Read the text below under headline ‘Case

Information’ (5-10 minutes)

•  AFTER you have read the text below, put yourself in the shoes of SI’s process engineer in charge of planning the intended process change. Recall the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle presented in the lecture and discuss within your group the following

question:

•  What activities have to be planned?

•  What information/data has to be gathered/

collected?

•  In answering these questions, try to be as detailed as possible. Write down your answers. Work about 20 minutes on this.

•  After 20-25 minutes, we will discuss all groups’ answers jointly in class.

Exercise 1:

(12)

Plan-Do-Check-Act – “Plan”

 

Where are we today?  

How do we get there?  

Where do we want to be?  

How do we monitor?  

How do we check whether we  

got to where we wanted to get to?  

characterize context  

identify/list issues (and prioritize)   set goals and  

measurable targets   define what must be changed  

and how it must be changed   measure performance  

get feedback   analyse data  

compare data with targets  

  Check   Do   Do   Check   Act  

(13)

Structure of Lecture 01

•  Clarification of Course Focus

•  Exercise 1

•  Homework 1

(14)

Homework 1: Introduction to SPI

Administrative information:

•  This homework has to be done individually. Maximum number of marks: 3

•  Submission deadline is Monday, 17-Feb-2014, at 17:00 sharp. If you don’t submit in time, you receive a penalty as follows:

–  Late delivery until Tuesday, 18-Feb-2014, at 17:00 à 1 mark penalty (-33%)

–  Late delivery after Tuesday, 18-Feb-2014, 17:00 à 3 marks penalty (-100%)

•  No exceptions from the penalty-rules will be made! •  Submit your homework using the ‘Submission’ function

provided on the course web-page: https://courses.cs.ut.ee/ 2014/SE_Man/spring/Main/Submission

•  IMPORTANT: Only files in PDF format will be accepted! I won’t look at files that are not PDF.

–  Please name the file as follows: HW1-LastnameFirstname.pdf (of course, replacing ‘Firstname’ and ‘Lastname’ with your

(15)

Structure of Lecture 01

•  Clarification of Course Focus

•  Exercise 1

•  Homework 1

(16)

Course Information/Overview

 

•  Level: Advanced course at master's level (in English)

•  Credits: 6 ECTS, 4 CP

•  Prerequisite: MTAT.03.094 Software Engineering (6 ECTS, 4 CP)

•  Work load:

–  Lectures (incl. practical work): 56 hours

–  Independent work: 100 hours

•  Assessment:

–  4 Homework Assignment (individual and pairs) – 25% of grade

–  Project (in groups): Report(s) and presentation – 35% of grade

–  Exam (written) – 40% of grade

–  Thresholds: HW – 10% / Project – 10% / Exam – 10%

(17)

Letter Grades

 

•  A

- An excellent performance, clearly outstanding. The candidate demonstrates

excellent judgement and a high degree of independent thinking.

•  B

- A very good performance. The candidate demonstrates sound judgement

and a very good degree of independent thinking.

•  C

- A good performance in most areas. The candidate demonstrates a

reasonable degree of judgement and independent thinking in the most important areas.

  D

- A satisfactory performance, but with significant shortcomings. The

candidate demonstrates a limited degree of judgement and independent thinking.

  E

- A performance that meets the minimum criteria, but no more. The candidate

(18)

Course Content

 

•  This course will expose students to

–  concepts, models and methods pertaining to the management

of software engineering activities.

•  In particular, the course will expose students to

–  common problems and approaches related to the management

and improvement of software engineering processes,

–  both in the context of single-site projects and in multi-site

projects.

(19)

Learning Outcomes

 

At the end of the course you will ...

•  have gained a good understanding of modern software

development processes, including Lean and Agile methods

•  know the characteristics and effects of different development

processes

(20)

Basic Literature

  PROFES

Manual  

•  PROFES - User Manual, 1999. Profes Consortium.

•  Software Process Definition and Management by Jürgen

Münch, Ove Armbrust, Martin Kowalczyk and Martín

Soto, Springer: the Fraunhofer Series on Software and

Systems Engineering, ISBN 978-3-642-24291-5 (eBook),

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24291-5

–  Chapter 1 (Introduction)

•  The Goal/Question/Metric method: A practical guide for

quality improvement of software development by Rini van

Solingen and Egon Berghout, McGraw-Hill, ISBN

0-07-709553-7, December 1999.

(21)

Further Information

 

(22)

Next Lecture

 

•  Date/Time:

–  Wednesday, 12-Feb, 14:15-16:00

•  Topic:

–  Introduction to Software Process Improvement (SPI)

•  For you to do:

References

Related documents

2009 National Maritime Yearbook The Cameroon National Shippers’ Council (CNSC) provides assistance to and protects the interests of shippers on the whole transport chain in view

In any case, The Histories and Darius’s own account of the events and history of the Persian Empire together tell a compelling story of Persia and Greece under the rule of

For example, if the primary storage is damaged without newest data available, we have to recover data using a previous backup together with parity logs using (5).. On the other hand,

2012 Leap of Sight, Galleri Olsson, Stockholm, Sweden 2011 Hide-outs, The Company, Los Angeles, CA 2010 Video Screenings , Inman Gallery, Houston, TX.. Sigrid Sandström,

Thus, the goal of the research is to define the effective ways of students’ foreign language communicative competence formation by means of reading and speaking activities within

In 2004, the South African Department of Science and Technology, through the National Research Foundation, established a Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, with the

The system comprises: memory storing computer instructions; non-volatile storage; a user input interface; a user output interface; a processor, communicatively coupled with the

2010 Hematology Oncology grand rounds presentation at the University of Miami: Surgical treatment of metastatic spinal disease, January 13, 2010. 2009 Radiation Oncology grand