• No results found

Construction Project Management Software UserView. Lessons from real software users

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Construction Project Management Software UserView. Lessons from real software users"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Construction Project

Management Software UserView

Lessons from real software users

(2)

We surveyed construction professionals for three months to better understand the use and effectiveness of software in construction project management. We compiled our responses in our UserView report to answer the following:

What types of software do construction professionals use to manage projects?

How satisfied are construction professionals with their software?

What are the common obstacles to effective project management?

How well does construction project management deliver promised benefits?

(3)

Construction Project Management Software Adoption

The vast majority (94 percent) of our sample used some type of software to manage their construction projects and only six percent used manual methods.

6% 8% 25% 61% Specialized Generic Homegrown Manual

(4)

Software Deployment Methods of Respondents

Construction project management software users are open to Cloud-based

systems with 57 percent reporting that they access their software over the Web.

43%

57%

Cloud-based On-premise

(5)

How Well Systems Fit Construction Professionals’ Needs

Construction project management (i.e. specialized) software users were most

satisfied with their software with 72 percent reporting the system met their needs.

Specialized Homegrown Manual Generic 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No

(6)

How Often Projects Are Completed Under Budget

Specialized software users reported superior project outcomes with 67 percent reporting that they complete projects under budget most of the time.

Specialized

Generic

Manual

Homegrown

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(7)

How Often Projects Are Completed Ahead of Schedule

No survey respondents who relied on manual methods to manage their projects reported that they complete projects ahead of schedule almost all the time.

Homegrown

Specialized

Generic

Manual

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(8)

Obstacles to Delivering Projects On Budget

The top challenges to delivering projects on budget were receiving inaccurate cost estimates for the project and working from incomplete design plans.

Inaccurate initial project estimates Working from incomplete design plans Scope of work definition disputes Uncaptured change orders Missed/delayed communications Materials delays/price increases Insurance claims Penalties for damages

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(9)

Obstacles to Delivering Projects On Schedule

The top challenges to delivering projects on schedule were changes to project plans, changes to the scope of projects, and issues with the construction site.

Change orders altering plans Scope creep Unforeseen site conditions Working from incomplete design plans Delayed document execution Materials delays Issues obtaining proper licenses Missed/delayed communications

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(10)

Professionals’ General Project Management Challenges

65 percent of our sample reported that software adoption was often or occasionally a challenge to managing their projects effectively.

Software adoption Standardizing project documentation Updating everyone on recent information Working from incomplete design plans Resolving disputes in a timely manner Accurately defining the scope of work Obtaining appropriate project approvals Unforeseen site conditions Managing document permissions Fluctuating material prices

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(11)

Construction Project Management Software Benefits

The top benefits of construction project management software were standardizing processes, access to detailed project documents and project collaboration.

Process standardization Access to detailed project documentation Better project collaboration Faster document approvals Able to manage larger projects Able to manage more projects Improved data accuracy Easier to keep detailed daily job logs Improved scheduling & time management

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(12)

Satisfaction with Project Management Features

58 percent of software users were very satisfied or satisfied with their RFI tracking while 59 percent reported similar satisfaction with submittal management.

RFI tracking Document management Submittal / transmittal management Daily job log Project scheduling Punch list tool Purchase order management Change order management Subcontractor billing Bid management

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(13)

Satisfaction with Software Vendor Services

62 percent of users were very satisfied or satisfied with their vendor’s user support. Meanwhile, 60 percent of users reported similar satisfaction with vendor training.

Email and phone support Training Issue resolution Implementation User knowledgebase Product enhancement updates Version upgrades User conferences

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(14)

Read the full report

Get free price quotes on top construction software

Get reviews & free demos on top construction software

Learn More About Construction Software

Read Report

Get Free Quotes

(15)

Software Advice is a trusted resource for software buyers. The company's website, www.softwareadvice.com, provides detailed reviews, comparisons and research to help organizations choose the right software. Meanwhile, the company’s team of software analysts provide free telephone consultations to help each software buyer identify systems that best fit their needs. In the process, Software Advice connects software buyers and sellers, generating high-quality opportunities for software vendors.

@SoftwareAdvice /company/software-advice

@SoftwareAdvice /SoftwareAdvice

References

Related documents

The polymer electrolyte fuel cell membranes studied here are prepared in house by spraying ink consisting of soluble Nafion ® and Pt/C catalyst powder (ETek 20% Pt on Vulcan

He is a partner in Kennedys’ international construction and engineering group based in Dubai, and specialises in project work and international arbitration.. He has wide

Using the quadratic model derived from each regional data set, the maximum GNDVI achieved for each season was calculated and regressed against the corresponding annual

2012 Leap of Sight, Galleri Olsson, Stockholm, Sweden 2011 Hide-outs, The Company, Los Angeles, CA 2010 Video Screenings , Inman Gallery, Houston, TX.. Sigrid Sandström,

Control of California's 1970 catastrophe depended upon the nationwide depth of the United States Forest Service, the statewide depth of the California Division of Forestry,

The al- gorithm during this period, in addition to supplying the load required power, produces the excess generated power (EGP) as shown in Figure 7(b), for feeding ES, EWH and DR.

lung cancer following previous lung disease in case-control studies 11 Table 5–1 Five-year survival from lung cancer – international comparisons 12 Table 1–5 Management