• No results found

Chapter 2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Chapter 2"

Copied!
55
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

TRADE AND

TECHNOLOGY: THE

RICARDIAN MODEL

1

Reasons for Trade

2

Ricardian Model

3

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

4

Solving for

(2)

Introduction

Why does the U.S. import goods that it could

easily produce itself with its great manufacturing

capability?

The first part of this book looks at the various

reasons for trade:

 Technological differences

 Differences in amounts of resources

 Differences in costs of outsourcing

(3)

Introduction

This chapter focuses on how technology

differences across countries affect trade.

 Ricardian model proposed by the 19th century economist David Ricardo.

It explains how the level of a country’s technology

affects wages paid to labor in a way that countries

with better technology have higher wages.

We use this to explain a country’s

trade pattern

(4)

Reasons for Trade

1.

Proximity

 The closer countries are the lower the costs of transportation.

2.

Resources

 A country can have resources that give it an edge in the production of certain goods.

 A country with a lot of snow may be very good at producing snowboards.

(5)

Reasons for Trade

3.

Absolute Advantage

 When a country has the best technology for

producing a good, it has an absolute advantage in the production of that good.

4.

Comparative Advantage

 Absolute advantage is actually not a good explanation for trade patterns.

 A country has a comparative advantage in producing those goods that it produces best

compared with how well it produces other goods.

(6)

Ricardian Model

To develop a Ricardian model of trade, we will use

an example with two goods: wheat and cloth.

 Wheat and other grains are major exports of the U.S.

and Europe.

 Many types of cloth are imported into these countries.

Home will be the country exporting wheat and

importing cloth.

Assume that labor is the only factor of production.

(7)

Ricardian Model

The Home Country

 One worker can produce 4 bushels of wheat or 2 yards of cloth.

 The Marginal Product of Labor is the extra output

obtained by using one more unit of labor.

 MPLW = 4 and MPLC = 2.

 We can use the marginal products of labor to construct Home’s Production Possibilities Frontier.

(8)

Ricardian Model

Using the setup, we can show:

Labor = 25, MPLW = 4, MPLC = 2QW = MPLW(L) = 25(4) = 100

 QC = MPLC(L) = 25(2) = 50

This gives us a straight line PPF which is a unique

feature of the Ricardian model.

 It assumes the marginal products of labor are constant.

• The slope also equals the opportunity cost of wheat—the amount of cloth that must be given up to obtain one more unit of wheat.

(9)

Ricardian Model

(10)

Ricardian Model

Home Indifference Curve

 Given Home’s PPF, how much wheat and cloth will home actually produce. The answer depends on demand.

 Demand can be represented with indifference curve.

 An indifference curve shows the combinations of two goods that the country can consume and be equally satisfied.

 All points on an indifference curve have the same level of utility.

(11)

Ricardian Model

The country is indifferent between A and B

The country is better off on U2 but cannot produce that much

U0<U1<U2

(12)

Ricardian Model

Home Equilibrium

 Without trade, the PPF acts as a budget constraint for the country.

 With perfectly competitive markets, the country will produce at its highest level of utility within the limits of the PPF.

 In the graph, the highest level of utility that can be reached and still stay within the PPF is U1 with

production at point A.

(13)

Ricardian Model

Opportunity Cost and Prices

 The slope of the PPF reflects the opportunity of producing one more bushel of wheat.

 Under perfect competition the opportunity cost of wheat should equal the price of wheat.

(14)

Ricardian Model

Wages

 Determination of wages

 In competitive markets firms hire workers up to the point at which the hourly wage equals the value of one more hour of production.

wage = P*MPL for each industry.

 In competitive markets, labor can move freely between industries.

Wages must be equal across industries.

 Equalization of wages implies that:

 This is the relative price of wheat.

Cost of wheat in terms of cloth.

W W C C

W C

C W

P MPL

P MPL

P

MPL

P

MPL

(15)

Ricardian Model

The Foreign Country

 Assume Foreign’s technology is inferior to Home’s.

 Foreign has an absolute disadvantage in producing both wheat and cloth as compared to Home.

 Foreign Production Possibilities Frontier

 Assume a Foreign worker can produce one bushel of wheat or one yard of cloth.

 MPL*W = 1, MPL*C = 1

(16)

Ricardian Model

(17)

Ricardian Model

Cloth (1 Yard)

Wheat (1 Bushel)

Home 2 Bushels of Wheat

½ Yard of Cloth

Foreign 1 Bushel of Wheat

1 Yard of Cloth

• Comparative Advantage

 Given the opportunity cost information, we can determine comparative advantages in each country for each good.

(18)

Ricardian Model

Comparative Advantage

 A country has a comparative advantage in a good when it has a lower opportunity cost of producing than

another country.

 By looking at the chart we can see that Foreign has a comparative advantage in producing cloth.

Foreign’s Opportunity cost of cloth is lower.

 Home has a comparative advantage in producing wheat.

(19)

Ricardian Model

Equilibrium in Foreign

 Foreign’s preferences can also be represented by an

indifference curve.

 The no-trade relative price of wheat is P*W/P*C = 1.

 The relative price exceeds Home’s no-trade relative

price of wheat: P*W/P*C = ½ .

 The difference in relative prices comes from the

comparative advantage that Home has in wheat.

(20)

Ricardian Model—Foreign

(21)

APPLICATION

Comparative Advantage in Apparel,

Textiles, and Wheat

• U.S. Textile and apparel industries face intense import competition.

• Burlington Industries announced in January 1999 it would reduce production capacity by 25% due to increased

imports from Asia.

• After layoffs they employed 17,400 persons in the U.S. with sales of $1.6 billion in 1999.

• Sales per employee were therefore $92,000.

• This is the average for all U.S. apparel producers.

(22)

APPLICATION

Comparative Advantage in Apparel,

Textiles, and Wheat

• In China, however, sales per employee are only $13,500 in apparel and $9,000 in textiles.

• The U.S. is 7 times more productive in apparel and 16 times more productive in textiles.

• So the U.S. has the absolute advantage in these products.

• For wheat, the U.S. produces 27.5 bushels per hour of labor.

• China produces only 0.1 bushel per hour of labor.

• The U.S. is thus 275 times as productive in wheat.

(23)

APPLICATION

Comparative Advantage in Apparel,

Textiles, and Wheat

Since the absolute advantage in wheat for the

U.S. is even greater than in apparel and textiles, it

has the comparative advantage in wheat.

China has the comparative advantage in apparel

and textiles because its productive disadvantage

relative to the U.S. is less than in wheat.

(24)

SIDE BAR

Can Comparative Advantage be Created?

The Case of “Icewine”

In general we think of a country having a

comparative advantage in a good.

 Certain countries have a comparative advantage in the production of wine.

Can a country create a comparative advantage?

(25)

SIDE BAR

Can Comparative Advantage be Created?

The Case of “Icewine”

 The Niagara Falls region of Canada began producing a product called “icewine” in 1983; it’s now made in

British Columbia, too.

 The grapes are allowed to freeze on the vine before they are picked.

 The unique flavor of the wine has led to a relatively high demand.

(26)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

What happens now when goods are traded

between Home and Foreign?

We will see the country’s no-trade relative price

determines which product it will export and which

it will import.

The no-trade relative price equals its opportunity

cost of production.

(27)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

International Trade Equilibrium

Relative price of cloth in Foreign is PC/PW = 1.Relative price of cloth in Home is PC/PW = 2.

 Therefore Foreign would want to export their cloth to Home—they can make it for $1 and export it for more than $1.

How Trade Occurs

 As Home exports wheat, quantity of wheat sold at Home falls.

 The price of wheat at Home is bid up.

 More wheat goes into Foreign’s market.

(28)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

International Trade Equilibrium

 Two countries are in a trade equilibrium when:

 the relative price of each good is the same in the two countries

the amount of each good that the countries want to trade

is equal

 In understanding the trade equilibrium we need to do two things:

Determine the relative price of wheat or cloth in the trade

equilibrium.

(29)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

International Trade Equilibrium

 The relative price of wheat in the trade equilibrium will be between the no-trade price in the two countries.

 Assume the free-trade price of PW/PC is 2/3.

 We can now take this price and see how trade changes production and consumption in each country.

 Home producers of wheat can earn more than the opportunity cost of wheat by selling it to Foreign.

(30)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

Home’s workers will want to work in wheat and no

cloth will be produced.

With trade, Home will be fully specialized in wheat

production.

2

4

8

1

3

2

6

W W

C C

W W C C

P MPL

P MPL

Therefore

P MPL

P MPL

Wages in wheat Wages in cloth

  

  

 

  

(31)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

International Trade

 Home can export wheat at the international relative price of 2/3.

 For each bushel of wheat it exports, it gets 2/3 yards of cloth in return.

 In figure 2.5 we trace this out to get a new price line showing the world price.

 The world price line shows the range of consumption

possibilities that a country can achieve by specializing in one good and trading.

Remember: this is only a consumption possibility because

(32)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

U2

World price line, Slope = –2/3

U1 A

50 100 Wheat, QW (bushels) Cloth, QC (yards)

B

Home production 50

25

• The new world price, PW/PC = 2/3, shows us the new range of consumption possibilities

• The country can now achieve a higher utility with the new

(33)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

Home imports 40 yards of cloth

Home consumption A B Home production 25 C

40 World price line,

Slope = –2/3

U2

U1

50 100 Wheat, QW (bushels) Cloth, QC (yards)

50

100

Home produces 100 bushels but

consumes only 40, so exports equal 60

50

Home produces 0 yards of cloth but consumes 40, so imports equal 40.

(34)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

International Trade

 Trade allows a country to engage in consumption possibilities it did not have before trade.

 We can see this as Home can now be on a higher

indifference curve with trade than they were without it.

 This is the first demonstration of gains from trade.

Pattern of Trade and Gains from Trade

 From figure 2.5, we can also see that Home’s exports and imports are equal when valued in the same units.

(35)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

(36)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

Pattern of Trade and Gains from Trade

 Each country is exporting the good for which it has the comparative advantage.

 This confirms that the pattern of trade is determined by comparative advantage.

 This is the first lesson of the Ricardian model.

 There are gains from trade for both countries.

 This is the second lesson of the Ricardian model.

It refutes the notion that free trade benefits one country while

(37)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

Pattern of Trade and Gains from Trade

 However, we have not yet determined the level of wages across countries.

 Relative prices converge. Do wages?

 Wages do rise in each country, but they do not converge. (Important political implications)

(38)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

Solving for Wages Across Countries

 As stated before, in competitive labor markets, firms will pay workers the value of their marginal product.

 Since Home produces and exports wheat, they will be paid in terms of that good—the real wage is MPLW = 4 bushels of wheat.

 The workers sell the wheat on the world market at a relative price of PW/PC = 2/3.

(39)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

Solving for Wages Across Countries

 We can do this for Foreign as well and summarize:

 Home real wage is

 4 bushels of wheat

8/3 yards of cloth

 Foreign real wage is

3/2 bushels of wheat  1 yard of cloth

 Foreign workers earn less than Home workers as measured by their ability to purchase either good.

(40)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

Wages are determined by absolute advantage

and trade is determined by comparative

advantage.

This should make sense.

 The only way a country with poor technology can export at a price others are willing to pay is by having low

wages.

As a country develops better technology, its

wages will rise. (Compare to autarky wages)

 Workers become better off through receiving higher wages.

(41)

Determining the Pattern of International Trade

We can see this in the real world

 Per capita income in China in 1978 was estimated at $925.

 In 2000, per capita income in China had risen to $3750.

 Per capita income in India more than doubled from $1180 in 1978 to $2480 in 2000.

(42)

APPLICATION

Labor Productivity and Wages

• Labor productivity can be measured by the value-added

per hour in manufacturing.

 Value-added is the difference between sales revenue in an industry and the costs of intermediate inputs.

Equals the payments to labor and capital in an industry.

 The Ricardian model ignores capital so we can measure labor productivity as value-added divided by the number of hours worked, or value-added per hour.

• Figure 2.7 shows value-added per hour in manufacturing for several countries.

(43)

APPLICATION

Labor Productivity and Wages

(44)

APPLICATION

Labor Productivity and Wages

We can also see the connection between

productivity and wages over time.

Figure 2.8 shows that the general upward

movement in labor productivity is matched by

upward movement in wages.

(45)

APPLICATION

Labor Productivity and Wages

(46)

Solving for International Prices

In the previous analysis we assumed the world

price of wheat was 2/3.

In reality world price is determined by a market for

exports and imports.

We will derive a Home export supply curve.

 Shows the amount it wants to export at various relative prices.

Similarly we will derive a Foreign import demand

curve.

(47)

Solving for International Prices

Home Export Supply Curve

 The export supply curve will have the relative price of

wheat on the Y-axis and the amount of wheat on the X-axis.

 We use the information in figure 2.9 to derive the curve.

 Compare production and consumption at each relative price.

 When Pw/Pc=1/2, Exports=0.

 When Pw/Pc=2/3, Exports=60.

The flat portion of the export supply curve is a

special feature of the Ricardian model.

(48)

Solving for International Prices

(49)

Solving for International Prices

Foreign Import Demand

 We can use a similar analysis to construct the import demand for wheat in figure 2.10.

 At the world relative price of 2/3, Foreign imports 60 bushels of wheat, C* and C*’.

 The no-trade equilibrium in Foreign, with a relative price of 1, is zero imports, A* and A*’.

 Production can shift from point A, at a price of 1, as workers move between industries:

If workers all shift to cloth.

(50)

Solving for International Prices

(51)

Solving for International Prices

International Trade Equilibrium

 We need to put the Home export supply together with the Foreign import demand.

 The exports from Home come from the excess domestic supply.

 The imports to Foreign come from the excess domestic demand.

 This is the World market for wheat (figure 2.11):

 Equilibrium price of 2/3 and trade of 60 bushels of wheat.

This is the amount that clears the world market.

(52)

Figure 2.11

(53)

Solving for International Prices

The Terms of Trade

 The price of a country’s exports divided by the price of its imports.

 For Home, PW/PC is their terms of trade.

 An increase in PW or a fall in PC will raise Home’s terms of trade.

 An increase in the terms of trade is good for a country: it makes it better off.

 A country will earn more for its exports.

A country will pay less for its imports.

(54)

APPLICATION

The Terms of Trade for Primary Commodities

Latin American economist Raúl Prebisch and

British economist Hans Singer each put forward

the hypothesis that the price of primary

commodities would decline over time relative to

the price of manufactured goods.

Primary commodities are often exported by

developing countries, so their terms of trade

would decline over time.

(55)

questions

• (1) which country has absolute advantage in wine? In cheese?

(2) Which country has comparative advantage in wine? In cheese?

(3). Graph each country’s PPF. Use indifference curve to show the no-trade equilibrium (label as point A) for each country. (Suppose Home country consumes 4 million pounds of

cheese and Foreign country consumes 6 pounds of cheese) (4) When trade is opened between Home and Foreign country,

Figure

Figure 2.7: Labor Productivity and Wages, 2001

References

Related documents

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

Field experiments were conducted at Ebonyi State University Research Farm during 2009 and 2010 farming seasons to evaluate the effect of intercropping maize with

DHR: drug hypersensitivity reactions; DTH: non-immediate/delayed-type DHR; MPE: maculopapular eruptions; DRESS: drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms;

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

Therefore the aim of this observational study was to assess the utility of the MYMOP2 and W-BQ12 health outcomes measures for measuring clinical change asso- ciated with a course

Also, both diabetic groups there were a positive immunoreactivity of the photoreceptor inner segment, and this was also seen among control ani- mals treated with a

This framework incorporates macro (structural &amp; symbolic institutions), meso (group), and micro (individual) levels of analysis, the idea of time and life course analysis, and

Due to the continued interest and debate in this area, we conducted a scoping systematic literature review and meta-analysis of all observational studies