R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Infinitely many solutions for a class of
fourth-order partially sublinear elliptic
problem
Hua Gu
*and Tianqing An
*Correspondence:
College of Science, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
Abstract
In this paper, we study the existence of infinitely many solutions for a class of
fourth-order partially sublinear elliptic problem with Navier boundary value condition by using an extension of Clark’s theorem.
Keywords: multiple solution; fourth-order elliptic problem; critical point; variational method
1 Introduction
Consider the following fourth-order boundary value problem:
u+cu=g(x,u) inΩ,
u=u= on∂Ω, ()
wheredenotes the biharmonic operator,Ω⊂RN (N> ) is a bounded domain with
smooth boundary,g∈C(Ω×R,R), andc<λis a parameter, whereλis the first
eigen-value of –inH (Ω).
The fourth-order elliptic equations can describe the static form change of beam or the motion of rigid body, so they are widely applied in physics and engineering. In the s, Lazer and Mckenna (see [, ]) investigated the problem () asg(x,u) =d[(u+ )+– ]. In [],
they pointed out that this type of nonlinearity furnishes a model to study traveling waves in suspension bridges. In [], they got k– solutions whenN= andd>λk(λk–c) (λkis
the sequence of the eigenvalues of –inH
(Ω)) by the global bifurcation method. In [],
Micheletti and Pistoia used a variational linking theorem to investigate the existence of two solutions for a more general nonlinearityg(·,u). In , Micheletti and Saccon (see []) obtained two results about the existence of two nontrivial solutions and four non-trivial solutions by a similar variational approach, depending on the position of a suitable parameter with respect to the eigenvalues of the linear part.
f ∈C(Ω×R,R)). In [], Hu and Wang obtained the existence of nontrivial solutions to problem () under suitable assumptions ofg(x,u) by a variant version of the mountain pass theorem. In [], we have studied the existence of multiple solutions for problem () by us-ing the variant fountain theorem without the conditionc<λ(λis the first eigenvalue of
–inH
(Ω)). In [], Wang and Shen, under an improved Hardy-Rellich inequality,
stud-ied the existence of multiple and sign-changing solutions for a class of biharmonic equa-tions in an unbounded domain by the minimax method and linking theorem. In , Liu and Chen (see []) investigated the existence of ground-state solution and nonexistence of nontrivial solution for a similar biharmonic equation in [] by using variational meth-ods, also they explored the phenomenon of concentration of solutions. For other related results, see [–] and the references therein.
In critical point theory, Clark’s theorem [] asserts the existence of a sequence of neg-ative critical values tending to for even coercive functionals. It is constantly and effec-tively applied to sublinear differential equations with symmetry. In , Wang (see []) explored a variant of the Clark theorem given by Heinz in [] to investigate a variety of nonlinear boundary value problems. Then, in , Liu and Wang improved Clark’s the-orem and gave an extension of Clark’s thethe-orem in []. Their new results gave a more detailed structure of the set of critical points near the origin and are powerful in applica-tions. In this paper, inspired by [], we will use the new result of Liu and Wang in [] to investigate the existence of infinitely many solutions for partially sublinear problems ().
Our main result is the following theorem.
Theorem Assume that there exists a constantδ> such that g∈C(Ω×[–δ,δ],R)is odd and bounded.The primitive G(x,u) :=ug(x,s)ds of the nonlinearity g satisfies
lim inf
|u|→ G(x,u)
|u| =∞ uniformly for x∈Ω. ()
Then problem()possesses infinitely many solutions uksuch thatuk∞→as k→ ∞,
where · ∞is the usual norm of L∞≡L∞(Ω).
Remark The advantage of this theorem is that it not only obtained the existence of infinite solutions, but it also pointed out their positions.
2 Preliminaries
LetE=H(Ω)∩H
(Ω) be the Hilbert space equipped with the inner product
(u,v)E=
Ω
uv–c∇u,∇vdx
and the norm
u= (u,u)
E.
A weak solution of problem () is au∈Esuch that
Ω
uv–c∇u,∇vdx–
Ω
for any v∈E. Here and in the sequel,·,· always denotes the standard inner product inRN.
Let:E→Rbe the functional defined by
(u) =
Ω
|u|–c|∇u|dx–
Ω
G(x,u)dx
= u
–
Ω
G(x,u)dx. ()
It is well known that a critical point of the functionalinEcorresponds to a weak solution of problem ().
Direct computation shows that
(u)v= (u,v)E–
Ω
g(x,u)v dx ()
for allu,v∈E. It is well known that:E→Eis compact. Denote by · pthe usual norm ofLp≡Lp(Ω) as
up=
Ω |u|pdx
p
, foru∈Lp, ≤p< +∞.
Lemma The normuis equivalent to the normuin E.
Proof This result can be found in [] (Lemma .), so we omit the proof here. Then by Lemma and Sobolev embedding theorem, there exists aτp> such that
up≤τpu, ∀u∈E, ()
for all ≤p≤NN–.
Letλi(i= , , . . .) be the eigenvalues of –inH(Ω). Then the eigenvalue problem
u+cu=μu inΩ, u=u= on∂Ω,
has infinitely many eigenvaluesμi=λi(λi–c),i= , , . . . .
Define a selfadjoint linear operatorA :L→Lby
(Au,v)=
Ω
uv–c∇u,∇vdx ()
with domainD(A) =E. Here, (·,·)denotes the inner product inL. Then the sequence of
eigenvalues ofA is just{μi}(i= , , . . .). Denote the corresponding system of
eigenfunc-tions by{en}, it forms an orthogonal basis inL.
Denote
Here,{·}denotes the cardinality of a set andncan be . Let
L–=span{e, . . . ,en–}, L=span{en–+, . . . ,en}, L+=L–⊕L⊥=span{en+, . . .}.
DecomposeLas L=L–⊕L⊕L+.
ThenEalso possesses the orthogonal decomposition
E=E–⊕E⊕E+ ()
with
E–=L–, E=L and E+=E∩L+=span{en+, . . .}. ()
To prove our main result, Theorem , we give the improved Clark theorem in [].
Theorem (See [], Theorem .) Let X be a Banach space,∈C(X,R).Assume satisfies the(PS)condition,is even and bounded from below,and() = .If for any k∈N,
there exists a k-dimensional subspace Xkof X andρ
k> such thatsupXk∩S
ρk< ,where
Sρ={u∈X| u=ρ},then at least one of the following conclusions holds.
(i) There exists a sequence of critical points{uk}satisfying(uk) < for allkand
uk →ask→ ∞.
(ii) There existsr> such that for any <a<rthere exists a critical pointusuch that
u=aand(u) = .
In order to apply this theorem to prove our main result, we set our working spaceE=
H(Ω)∩H
(Ω) as the spaceXin Theorem . 3 Proof of Theorem 1
Now we prove our main result, Theorem .
Proof of Theorem Chooseg∈C(Ω×R,R) so thatgis odd inu∈R,
g(x,u) =
⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩
g(x,u), x∈Ω,|u| ≤δ/, odd, x∈Ω,δ/ <|u| ≤δ, , x∈Ω,|u|>δ.
()
Sincegis bounded, together with (), we see that there exists a constantcsuch that g(x,u)≤c for allx∈Ωandu∈R. ()
Here and in the sequel, we denoteci> (i= , , . . .) for different positive constants.
In order to obtain solutions of (), we study the system
u+cu=g(x,u) inΩ,
with the functional defined by
(u) =
Ω
|u|–c|∇u|dx–
Ω
G(x,u)dx= u
–
Ω
G(x,u)dx, ()
for allu∈E. Here,G(x,u) :=ug(x,s)dsis the primitive of the nonlinearityg. It is easy to find that∈C(E,R),() = andis even. In view of the boundedness ofG(x,u),is
bounded from below. At the same time
(u)v= (u,v)E–
Ω
g(x,u)v dx ()
for allu,v∈E. It is well known that:E→Eis compact.
Now the proof of conclusion of Theorem is divided into three steps.
Step .satisfies the (PS) condition.
We assume the sequence{un} ⊂Esatisfies the requirement that{(un)}is bounded and
(un)→ asn→ ∞. Now we claim that the sequence{un}is bounded inEand possesses
a strong convergent subsequence.
First, we claim that{un}is bounded inE. By (), we setun=u–n+un+u+n∈E–⊕E⊕E+.
Considering(un)→ asn→ ∞, we have(un)< asnis large enough. Then
(un)u+n≤ (un)u+n<u+n. ()
By (), (), (), (), and (), we have
u+n> (un)u+n
=un,u+n
E–
Ω
g(x,un)u+ndx ≥u+n,u+nE–
Ω
g(x,un)u+ndx ≥u+n–cu+n
≥u+n–cu+n. ()
From (), we learn that{u+
n}is bounded inE. Similarly, we see that{u–n}is bounded inE,
too.
Now we consider{u
n}. By the assumption that{(un)}is bounded, there exists a
con-stantK> such that|(un)| ≤K. Thus, by (), we have
K≥
un
–
Ω
G(x,un)dx ≥
u
–
n
+un+u+n–
Ω
G(x,un)dx ≥
u
n – Ω
G(x,un) –G
x,undx–
Ω
Here,
G(x,un) –G
x,un= g(x,ξ)u+n+u–n,
≤ g(x,ξ)u+n+ g(x,ξ)u–n, ξis betweenunandun, ()
and
Gx,un=
un
g(x,s)ds= g(x,ξ)un, ξis between andun. ()
By (), (), ()-(), together with the boundedness of{u+
n}and{u–n}, we have
K≥
u
n
–
Ω
g(x,ξ)u+n+ g(x,ξ)u–ndx–
Ω
g(x,ξ)undx ≥
u
n
–cu+n+u –
n
–cun
≥
u
n
–c–cun. ()
From (), we can see that{u
n}is bounded inE. Thus,{un}is bounded inE.
Second, we claim that{un}possesses a strong convergent subsequence inE.
Now, define an operatorT:E→Eas
(Tu,v)E=
Ω
g(x,u)v dx.
It is obvious thatT is a compact operator. Then () changes into
(u)v= (u,v)E– (Tu,v)E= (u–Tu,v)E.
So,(u) =u–Tu. Setu=un, we have
(un) =un–Tun. ()
Considering the boundedness of{un}and the compactness of the operatorT,{Tun}has
a strong convergent subsequence. Combining (un)→ asn→ ∞, we see that{un}
possesses a strong convergent subsequence inE.
Step .Construction of spaceXk∩S
ρk and proof ofsupXk∩S
ρk< .
In view of (), we learn that for anyM> there exists a constantβ> such that
G(x,u)
|u| >M, |u|<β, uniformly forx∈Ω. ()
For anyk∈N, we choosek-dimensional subspace ofEasXk(e.g.the subspace spanned
by eigenfunctions {en}). By the equivalence of any two norms on finite-dimensional
space Xk, we can choose a sufficient small constant ρ
k> such that, for any u∈Xk, u∞<β, asu=ρkuniformly forx∈Ω. That is for anyu∈Xk,
Now we can construct the spaceXk∩S
ρk whereSρk ={u∈X| u=ρk}. For anyu∈
Xk∩S
ρk, by the equivalence of any two norms on finite-dimensional spaceX
k, together
with () and (), we have
(u) = u
–
Ω
G(x,u)
|u| |u| dx
< u
–Mu
≤
u
–Mc
u. ()
For anyMlarge enough, we can choose a sufficiently smallρksuch that(u) < . Thus,
sup
Xk∩S
ρk
< . ()
Now we appeal to Theorem to obtain infinitely many solutionsukfor () such that uk → ask→ ∞.
Step .Solutions of () are solutions of ().
By virtue of the boundedness ofg(x,u), we have the solutions of ()uk∈W,q(Ω) for
anyq∈[, +∞). Then we have
uk∈W,q(Ω)∩H(Ω)→C,
α
(Ω)⊂C(Ω) () (the embedding theorem is given in [], Theorem .).
Sinceuk →, thenuk∞→. Whenkis large enough, there exists a constantδ>
such that|uk(x)|<δ/. Theng(x,uk(x)) =g(x,uk(x)). Therefore,ukare the solutions of ()
withksufficiently large anduk∞→ ask→ ∞.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
HG wrote the first draft and TA corrected and improved the final version. All authors read and approved the final draft.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referee for his/her careful reading of the manuscript and the useful suggestions and comments. Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. 2016B08614).
Received: 17 July 2016 Accepted: 7 December 2016
References
1. Lazer, AC, Mckenna, PJ: Large-amplitude periodic oscillations in suspension bridges: some new connections with nonlinear analysis. SIAM Rev.32, 537-578 (1990)
2. Lazer, AC, McKenna, PJ: Global bifurcation and a theorem of Tarantello. J. Math. Anal. Appl.181(3), 648-655 (1994) 3. Micheletti, AM, Pistoia, A: Multiplicity results for a fourth-order semilinear elliptic problem. Nonlinear Anal.31,
895-908 (1998)
4. Micheletti, AM, Saccon, C: Multiple nontrivial solutions for a floating beam equation via critical point theory. J. Differ. Equ.170, 157-179 (2001)
5. Pu, Y, Wu, X, Tang, C: Fourth-order Navier boundary value problem with combined nonlinearities. J. Math. Anal. Appl.
398, 798-813 (2013)
6. Hu, S, Wang, L: Existence of nontrivial solutions for fourth-order asymptotically linear elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal.94, 120-132 (2014)
7. Gu, H, An, T: Existence of multiple solutions for fourth-order elliptic problem. Abstr. Appl. Anal. (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/780989
8. Wang, Y, Shen, Y: Multiple and sign-changing solutions for a class of semilinear biharmonic equation. J. Differ. Equ.
9. Liu, H, Chen, HB: Ground-state solution for a class of biharmonic equations including critical exponent. Z. Angew. Math. Phys.66, 3333-3343 (2015)
10. An, Y, Liu, R: Existence of nontrivial solutions of an asymptotically linear fourth-order elliptic equation. Nonlinear Anal.
68, 3325-3331 (2008)
11. Liu, J, Chen, S, Wu, X: Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a class of fourth-order elliptic equations inRN. J. Math.
Anal. Appl.395, 608-615 (2012)
12. Liu, X, Huang, Y: On sign-changing solution for a fourth-order asymptotically linear elliptic problem. Nonlinear Anal.
72, 2271-2276 (2010)
13. Xu, G, Zhang, J: Existence results for some fourth-order nonlinear elliptic problems of local superlinearity and sublinearity. J. Math. Anal. Appl.281, 633-640 (2003)
14. Yang, Y, Zhang, J: Existence of solutions for some fourth-order nonlinear elliptic problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl.351, 128-137 (2009)
15. Zhang, W, Tang, X, Zhang, J: Infinitely many solutions for fourth-order elliptic equations with general potentials. J. Math. Anal. Appl.407, 359-368 (2013)
16. Clark, D: A variant of the Lusternik-Schnirelman theory. Indiana Univ. Math. J.22(1), 65-74 (1973)
17. Wang, Z-Q: Nonlinear boundary value problems with concave nonlinearities near the origin. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl.8, 15-33 (2001)
18. Heinz, HP: Free Ljusternik-Schnirelmann theory and the bifurcation diagrams of certain singular nonlinear systems. J. Differ. Equ.66, 263-300 (1987)
19. Liu, Z, Wang, Z-Q: On Clark’s theorem and its applications to partially sublinear problems. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire32, 1015-1037 (2015)