University of Huddersfield Repository
Purdie, Fiona, Ward, Lisa J, McAdie, Tina M. and King, Nigel
Does work integrated learning better psychologically prepare British students for life and work.
Original Citation
Purdie, Fiona, Ward, Lisa J, McAdie, Tina M. and King, Nigel (2011) Does work integrated learning better psychologically prepare British students for life and work. In: Association for Sandwich Education and Training (ASET) Annual Conference 2011, September, 2011, Leeds Metropolitan University. (Submitted)
This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/11837/
The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided:
• The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy;
• A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and
• The content is not changed in any way.
For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected].
Does work integrated learning
better psychologically prepare
British students for life and work?
Lisa Ward
Fiona Purdie
Today’s presentation
•
Background to the study
– Joining the international work integrated learning project
– Placements at the University of Huddersfield
– What we know from the literature about the psychological effect of WIL
•
Methodology
– Design
– Design
– Measures
– Sample
•
Results
– Does WIL influence students psychologically and in what way?
•
Implications
– For the academic community
– For the University of Huddersfield
– For HEIs nationally and internationally
An international study…
• Originated at the University of Waterloo (Canada)
• Definition: Co-operative Education, Placements, internships
• The largest Co-operative Education Provider in Canada with
• The largest Co-operative Education Provider in Canada with
15,000 students.
• WatCACE
An international study…
Project Partners:
• Assoc Prof Maureen Drysdale, University of Waterloo, Canada
• Assoc Prof Maureen Drysdale, University of Waterloo, Canada
• Dr Kristina Johansen, University West, Sweden,
• Dr Sheri Dressler, University of Central Florida, USA
• Elena Zaitseva, Liverpool John Moores, UK
Placements at the
University of Huddersfield
• 25,000 students
• 2011 fee ‘free’ placements, from 2012 - £500
• Sandwich Degrees
• Sandwich Degrees
• Professional Placements
• Big Society Volunteering
The Background
Graduate employment challenges:
Record numbers of graduates in the UK
(Chevalier & Lindley, 2009)Increasing difficulty in securing employment post-university
(Browne, 2010)Higher expectations as a result of tuition fee reforms
(Browne, 2010)Higher expectations as a result of tuition fee reforms
(Browne, 2010)Result:
A challenge to design programs better equipped to enable students
to acquire the skills, knowledge & experience that increase
employability & lead to more satisfying careers.
The documented benefits of
Work Integrated Learning
Occupational/academic benefits
(Powell et al., 2008; Bates, 2008):Better careers
Better salaries
Better degree outcomes
Specific competencies:
(Costley, 2007; Crebert et al., 2002, Dreuth & Deuth-Fewell, 2002; Lizzio & Wilson, 2004; Rickard, 2002)
Decision making
Interpersonal and self-management skills
The application of theoretical knowledge in workplace environments
Professional networking and behaviour
The documented benefits of
Work Integrated Learning
Psychological factors:
A more positive view of chance of gaining employment
over specific competencies or occupational advantage
(Allen & van der Velden, 2007).
(Allen & van der Velden, 2007).
Self esteem
(Crebert
et al
., 2002)
Research question
Do students who pursue WIL have
significantly higher concept,
self-efficacy, hope, and motivation for study,
efficacy, hope, and motivation for study,
and significantly lower procrastination,
compared to students who pursue a more
Questions
Questions
Sample
• Self selected sample of undergraduate students, from all
academic schools at the University of Huddersfield, UK
(n=621)
• Placement: 33.3%/ non placement: 66.7%
• Placement: 33.3%/ non placement: 66.7%
• Males: 25% / Females: 75% (significantly more females
undertake placements)
Percentage of students per school,
by placement participation
13.9% 10.8%
13.4% Applied sciences placement
Applied sciences no placement Art, Design & Architecture placement Art, Design & Architecture no placement Business placement Business no placement 14.4% 30.9% 13.1% 3.6% Business no placement
Computing & engineering placement Computing & engineering no placement
Education & professional development placement Education & professional development no placement Human & health sciences placement
Human & health sciences no placement Music humanities & media placement Music humanities & media no placement
Placement
33%
67%
Current part time work
38%
62%
Voluntary work 29%
Proportion of students undertaking
work related activity
67%
Internship
96%
4% Relevant previous work
15% 85% 62% 71% Experiential learning 91% 9%
Design
• Cross-sectional analysis
• Measures, demographic and educational data were collected
from participants at the end of their academic year.
• Chosen to accommodate the varied placement programmes
available at the University of Huddersfield
Measures
Trait Hope Scale (THS: Snyder et al., 1991), which measures hopes and goals
Procrastination Assessment Scale – Students (PASS: Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), which measures the postponement of goals and tasks.
Self-Description Questionnaire III (SDQ-III: Marsh & O’Neill, 1984)., which measures a set of learned perceptions, beliefs and opinions that individuals hold about themselves.
learned perceptions, beliefs and opinions that individuals hold about themselves.
College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale(CASES: Owen & Froman, 1988), which measures the degree of competence participants believe they have in various academic settings.
Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ: Pintrich et al., 1993), which assesses motivation and learning strategies by University students.
Questions
Questions
Academic achievement reported by
placement and non-placement students
51% 50% 41% 33% 40% 50% 60% 16% 26% 6% 0% 18% 23% 9% 1% 12% 33% 8% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30%
70%+/ 1st class 60-69%/ 2:1 class 50-59%/ 2:2 class 40-49%/ 3rd Class <40% / fail No placement Placemnent Official figures for UoH 09/10 year
Mean results by
placement participation
t=1.70 p<0.05 t=2.36 p<0.01 t=1.89 p<0.05MSLQ subscale: Test anxiety Trait hope (THS) THS subscale: agency
Theoretical implications
• Our findings suggest that cognitions & emotions are most affected by WIL
• Findings are consistent with previous evidence to suggest that an
improvement in confidence is a key outcome of WIL (Cope, 2000; Ward,
2009).
2009).
• Lack of significant differences in measures relating to learning behaviours,
e.g. procrastination, learning strategies, or in academic achievement were
found, contrary to existing literature (Powell
et al
., 2008).
Why might this be?
The specificity of the experiential differences
between placement and non-placement students.
Practical implications
For the University of Huddersfield and beyond
• Models of graduate employability suggest that
self-confidence and self esteem are key facilitators of later
employment (Dacre Pool & Sewell 2007).
• Changes in HE landscape with higher fees from 2012
–
Will two year degrees become the norm?
–
How can work related elements be better integrated into courses?
–
Will student stake on even more part-time jobs to pay for education?
Limitations and
directions for future research
• Main limitation: the use of a cross-sectional design.
• Precluded understanding whether differences are a
result of WIL or whether students who participate in WIL
are different prior to commencing placement.
are different prior to commencing placement.
• Future studies employing a pre-post design are indicated
• Longitudinal studies documenting occupational
Next Steps
• Secured funding for qualitative research. ‘The more the
merrier?: a qualitative examination of the contribution of
multiple work integrated learning experiences to student
learning, personal development and preparation for
learning, personal development and preparation for
employment.’
• Looking for ongoing collaborations with our research
partners.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that work integrated learning has a much more
wide reaching influence than simply moulding better students.
It’s effect is one of a more hopeful and confident adult, better
equipped emotionally to face the challenges of the employment
Up Coming Presentations
• Impact Upon Teaching and Learning –
University of Huddersfield,
Teaching and Learning Committee, September.
• ‘In the right placement at the right time? An investigation of the
psychological outcomes of placement learning’
International Conference
psychological outcomes of placement learning’
International Conference
on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2011), Istanbul,
October.
• ‘Learning beyond the lecture room: Do placements help students learn
about themselves and for themselves?’
Psychology of Education
Questions
Questions
Thank you for your time
and attention
and attention
Contact:
Lisa Ward, University of Huddersfield
[email protected]
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Maureen Drysdale and colleagues at the
University of Waterloo, Canada for the contribution of their
University of Waterloo, Canada for the contribution of their
research design and for our inclusion in the international Work
References
Allen, J. & van der Velden, A. (2007). Transitions from Higher Education to Work. Higher Education Dynamics, 17, 55-78.
Bates, M. (2008). Work-integrated curricula in university programs. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(4), 305-317.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413.
Carver, R. (1996). Theory for Practice: A Framework for Thinking About Experiential Education.
The Journal of Experiential Education 19, 8-13.
Carver, R. (1996). Theory for Practice: A Framework for Thinking About Experiential Education.
The Journal of Experiential Education 19, 8-13.
Collin, K., & Tynjala, P. (2003). Integrating theory and practice? Employees' and students' experiences of learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15,338-344.
Cope, P., Cuthbertson, P., Stoddart B. 2000 Situated learning in the practice placement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31 (4) 850–856.
Costley, C. (2007). Work-based learning: assessment and evaluation in higher education.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(1), 1-9.
Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C.-J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: graduates; perceptions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(2), 147-165.
References
Dacre Pool L.., & Sewell, P. (2007). The key to employability: developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education and Training, 49(4), 277-289.
Dreuth, L., & Deuth-Fewell, M. (2002). A model of student learning in community service field placements. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 251-264.
Drysdale, M., Dressler, S., Johansson K., Zaitseva E., Chiupka C., Clifford E et al. (2011) Academic Attitudes and Behaviours of Work Integrated Learning and Non Work Integrated Learning
Students from Four Countries. 17th World Conference on Cooperative & Work Integrated Education (Philadelphia, USA).
Education (Philadelphia, USA).
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2004). Action Learning in Higher Education: an investigation of its potential to develop professional capability. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 469-488. Marsh, H.W. & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire III: The Construct Validity of Multidimensional Self-Concept Ratings by Late Adolescents. Journal of Educational
Measurement, 21 (2), 153-174.
Owen, S. V. and R. D. Froman (1988). Development of a College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (New Orleans, LA).
Pintrich P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T. & Mckeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53 (3) 801-813.
References
Proudman, B. (1992). Experiential Education as Emotionally-Engaged Learning. The Journal of Experiential Education 15, 19-23.
Rhodes, G., & Shiel, G. (2007). Meeting the needs of the workplace and the learner through work-based learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(3), 173-187.
Rickard, W. (2002). Work-based Learning in Health: evaluating the experience of learners, community agencies and teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 47-63.
community agencies and teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 47-63.
Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J.R., Holleran, S.A., Irving, L.M., Sigmon, S.T., et al (1991) The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570-585.
Solomon, L.J., & Rothblum, E.D. (1984) Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503-509.
Ward, L. (2009). How inspirational and innovative Teaching and Learning projects at the
University of Huddersfield prepare our graduates with employability skills for a changing world of work. Paper presented at 16th World Conference on Cooperative Education, (Vancouver,