• No results found

Demystifying Citation Metrics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Demystifying Citation Metrics"

Copied!
43
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Michael Ladisch

Pacific Libraries

(2)

Citation

Count

h Index

(3)

Outline

Use and Misuse of Bibliometrics

Databases for Citation Analysis

Web of Science

Scopus

Google Scholar

Journal Ranking

Journal Citation Reports

ScImago Journal Rank

Alt-metrics

(4)

Not everything that can be

counted counts, and not

everything that counts can

be counted.

William Bruce Cameron (1963) “Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking”

(5)

… is a set of methods to quantitatively analyze

academic literature.

Metrics are one indicator used for

• Evaluation of research by

individual researcher / group / institution

• Awarding research grants

• Recruitment / Promotion

• Discovering relevant publications

• Finding relevant journals

Be aware

• Measuring “Impact” not “Quality”

• Works better in some disciplines than in others

• Metrics are not the “whole picture”, no replacement for peer review

(6)

Primary metrics:

• Number of publications

• Number of citations received

• Collaborations

• Weighted Impact

Secondary metrics:

• Journal Impact Factor

• H-Index Types of metrics: • Journal metrics • Author metrics • Article metrics • Alt-metrics

Bibliometrics

(7)

Many reasons for citing

• Acknowledge published or unpublished sources

• Highlight other sources

• Criticize other sources (negative citations)

• Self-citations

• “Strategic citations”

• Citation networks

• Publications in same journal/by same publisher

Bibliometrics

(8)

Number of Authors / Contribution to publication

• Single author vs. multiple authors

• Position in author listing

Bibliometrics

(9)

Document types • Book • Book chapter • Review • Article • Conference paper • Editorial • Book review • Note • Letter to editor • Correspondence Location in publication • Introduction • Background • Methods • Results • Discussion • Conclusion Number of occurrences

Bibliometrics

Citation = Citation?

(10)

Publication Year http://www.researchtrends.com/issue- 37-june-2014/downloads-versus- citations-and-the-role-of-publication-language/

Bibliometrics

Citation = Citation?

(11)

Bibliometrics

Discipline

Citation = Citation?

http://www.harzing.com/data_metrics_ comparison.htm#indivh

(12)

The Controversy

http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351

“Quantitative evaluation

should support qualitative,

expert assessment.”

(13)

The Controversy

http://www.ascb.org/dora/

San Francisco

San Francisco

Declaration on Research Assessment

(14)
(15)

How many

h

of

a researcher’s

publications have

at least

h

citations each.

Source: Wikipedia

Aims to capture

both productivity

(output) and

impact (citations)

H-Index

(16)

Considering

productivity and

impact

Comprehensible

Easy to compute

Not taking subject

differences in account

Disadvantaging early

career researchers

Distinguishing between

single and multi-author

articles

(17)

The Tools

Scopus (Elsevier)

Web of Sciences (Clarivate)

Google Scholar

(18)

The Tools

Web of Science Vs. Scopus Coverage

11,377

WoS

Scopus

(19)

http://www.scopus.com/

(20)

http://www.scopus.com/

(21)

http://www.scopus.com/

(22)

https://www.webofknowledge.com/

(23)

https://www.webofknowledge.com/

(24)
(25)
(26)

Journal Citation Reports – Journal Impact Factor

• 55 Subject categories

• Uses Web of Science dataset

(27)
(28)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

http://www.scimagojr.com

• 27 Subject areas and 313 Subject categories

• Uses Scopus dataset

(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)

Altmetrics

"Altmetrics are measures of scholarly impact mined from activity in online tools and environments.”

Jason Priem, author of “Altmetrics: a manifesto”

Benefits:

• A more nuanced understanding of impact, showing us which

scholarly products are read, discussed, saved and recommended as well as cited.

• Often more timely data, showing evidence of impact in days instead of years.

• A window on the impact of web-native scholarly products like datasets, software, blog posts, videos and more.

• Indications of impacts on diverse audiences including scholars but also practitioners, clinicians, educators and the general public.

(33)
(34)

• Viewed (publisher websites, Dryad)

• Downloaded (publisher websites , Slideshare, Dryad)

• Cited (WoS, Scopus, PubMed, Wikipedia, CrossRef)

• Shared (Facebook, Twitter)

• Reused/adapted (Github)

• Bookmarked ( Mendeley, CiteULike, Delicious)

• Purchased (Library catalogues, Sales numbers)

• Commented upon (Twitter, Mendeley, blogs, publisher websites, Wikipedia, Faculty 1000)

Source: S. Konkiel, Univ. of Indiana

Altmetrics

(35)

• Lack of standard

• Use of online tools my differ by individual researcher, discipline, over time

• Popularity (attention) does not always equal quality of research or researcher

• Was the spike in hits a one-time, short-attention event?

• Data sources come and go (think MySpace, Connotea)

• Open to manipulation and gaming

Altmetrics

(36)

Altmetrics - Impactstory

(37)

Altmetrics – Altmetric.com

(38)

Altmetrics – PlumAnalytics

(39)

• Books • Book chapters • Journal articles • Conference papers • Working papers • Patents • Government publications

Your Resume

To include in your CV

Count and mention

• Number of citations

• Impact factor of journal

• Your h-Index

• Downloads/views from Repository

• Reviews of book or book chapter

(40)

• Datasets / Open Source Software (download statistics)

• Awards (best paper award etc.)

• Reviewing invitations (journals, conferences)

• Editorial board membership

• Interviews, public appearances

• Scholarly articles in newspapers/magazines

• Links to professional blogs and professional accounts in social media (Twitter, Facebook, ResearchGate,

Acedemia.edu, LinkedIn, etc.)

Your Resume

(41)

Your Resume

(42)

Your Resume

(43)

Thank you!

Contact: Michael Ladisch Phone: 209.932.3188 Email: [email protected] Twitter: MichaelLibrCA ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0124-5582

Feel free to attend other Scholarly Communication Talks

For schedule see: http://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/plw/

And check out the workshops provided by:

Office of Sponsored Programs Institutional Review Board Graduate School

References

Related documents

(2012); 4) evaluate the effect of different cropping systems and seasons on the mag- nitude of measured electrical conductivity; and 5) determine if drainage water flow, pH,

Preece, Rogers and Sharp (2005) put the time for a task to be completed (efficiency), the learning time of a task (learnability) and the number of errors in performing a task in

An examination of the data revealed four ways in which the characteristics about a Josephite approach to education are evident in the leadership practices of Principals and

Working in partner- ship with the Center for the Improvement of Teacher Education and Schooling at Brigham Young University, CREDE produced a set of video ethnographies, Teaching

Issues such as multiple channels, revenue sources, how to package products, local and global payment methods, charge cards, channels sales, revenue reporting, reconciliation,

The ICT department will develop partnerships with departments, faculties and other teaching areas to deliver specific strategic projects supporting College activities and in

However, there are also other important features of traditional portfolio choice that are not always made explicit in terms of investor’s wealth, information, and horizon: The

media audiences are studies that do not deny the problem of socio-cultural background, whether environmental, family, education, religion, culture, etc., which will affect