Teaching as a design
science: developing reliable
knowledge of learning
technology
Diana Laurillard
London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education
Teachers as an innovative
professional learning community
•
Reconceptualising teaching as ‘a design science’
•
Teachers building on the designs of others
•
Ar8cula8ng their pedagogy
•
Adop8ng, adap8ng, tes8ng, improving learning designs
•
Co-‐crea8ng and sharing learning designs
It’s difficult, but it’s worth a try, because…
Teachers need much more support than they get to
make the most of learning technologies
If they can learn together, collaborate, build on the work
of others, they can build this knowledge
Not in just in staff development courses, not from books,
not through exhorta8on, but in the same way as other
designers learn…
That’s why we built
à
Should learning design be
A ‘pedagogical patterns collector’ for capturing and articulating good pedagogy
A’ learning design support tool’ for teachers to find, adopt, adapt, analyse, experiment, trial in practice, redesign, and share designs
By developing design tools
The Learning Designer
A TLRP-TEL project
http://tinyurl.com/ppcollector3
https://sites.google.com/a/lkl.ac.uk/ldse/Home
To help teachers
Articulate their effective teaching ideas for others to adopt
Adopt ‘pedagogical patterns’ of good teaching and open resources Model pedagogical and logistical benefits/disadvantages
Timings Categorised teaching-‐ learning ac8vi8es Short descrip8on Learning outcome Colour-‐ coded content
Capturing pedagogy as design plans
Black text ar8culates
the teacher’s pedagogy
The Pedagogical Patterns Collector
Black text captures pedagogy design Colour-‐coded text iden8fies content A library of
paLerns to inspect, both
generic and specific versions
Read, Watch, Listen Investigate Discuss Practice Share Produce
Adjust the type of learning ac8vity. Edit the
instruc8ons.
Check the feedback on the overall
distribu8on of learning ac8vity Add link to an
OER, e.g. a digital tool for prac8ce
Adopt – Adapt – Import resources- Test and re-design - Export
Adopt/Adapt a teaching pattern
Export to Word [Moodle]
Represent the teacher as present or not
Comments on the PPC
•
[The pie-‐chart] is one of the most useful features … it
gives a good overview of the balance between different
learning experiences
•
I rarely consider how the students' Ame is apporAoned …
it's good to be made to think about this.
•
Seeing how the sessions are shaping up in such a visual
medium …. would probably make me think more
carefully about providing a mix of acAviAes
A Pedagogical Pattern Collector for capturing and articulating good pedagogy
The Learning Designer for teachers to find, adopt, adapt, analyse, experiment, trial in practice, redesign, and share designs
By developing design tools
The Learning Designer
A TLRP-TEL project
http://tinyurl.com/ppcollector3
https://sites.google.com/a/lkl.ac.uk/ldse/Home
To help teachers
Articulate their effective teaching ideas for others to adopt
Adopt ‘pedagogical patterns’ of good teaching and open resources Model pedagogical and logistical benefits/disadvantages
The Learning Designer overview
The start screen: Import or Create Properties: • Credit hours • Student numbers • Learning outcomes • Description • Designer reflection • Student feedback Timeline: • Select teaching-learning activities,
• Define what they do
in activity
• Define timing of
each one, group sizes, sequencing
Analysis:
• Charts of the overall
learning experience – types of learning, and of experience of personal, social or whole class • teacher workload –
for initial design and for reuse
L C Teacher concepts C L L P P L Learner concepts Learner practice Generate Modulate
Learning through acquisition, instruction
Learning through inquiry
Acquiring
Inquiring
Talk, book, video, Web
A theory-based framework of the
learner learning
L C Teacher concepts Learning environment L C L P P L Learner concepts Learner practice Generate Modulate
Learning through practice with meaningful
intrinsic
feedback
Task/Feedback Actions Generate Modulate Lab, Game, Simula8on
A theory-based framework of the
learner learning
Instructivism - Social constructivism – Experiential learning – Inquiry learning - Constructionism – Collaborative learning
(Dewey, Vygotsky, Piaget, Gagné Bruner, Papert, Marton, Bransford…)
L C
Teacher
concepts concepts Peer
Peer prac8ce Learning environment L C L P P L Learner concepts Learner practice Generate Modulate Generate Modulate Generate Modulate Practising Ideas, questions Ideas, questions Outputs Outputs Acquiring Inquiring
A theory-based framework of the
learner learning
L C
Teacher
concepts concepts Peer
Peer prac8ce Learning environment L C L P P L Teacher communication cycle Peer communication cycle Teacher modelling cycle Peer modelling cycle Learner concepts Learner practice Generate Modulate Generate Modulate
The Conversational Framework
Generate Modulate Teacher practice cycle Peer practice cycle
Instructivism Social constructivism Experiential learning Inquiry learning Collaborative learning
Instructivism - Social constructivism – Experiential learning – Inquiry learning - Constructionism – Collaborative learning
(Dewey, Vygotsky, Piaget, Gagné Bruner, Papert, Marton, Bransford…)
L C
Teacher
concepts concepts Peer
Peer prac8ce Learning environment L C L P P L Learner concepts Learner practice Generate Modulate Generate Modulate Generate Modulate Practising Acquiring Inquiring Discussing Producing Collaborating
A theory-based framework of the
learner learning
L C
Teacher
concepts concepts Peer
Peer prac8ce Learning environment L C L P P L Learner concepts Learner practice Generate Modulate Generate Modulate
Learning with technology
Inquiring Discussing Acquiring Prac8sing Collabora8ng Producing Web resources Webinar, Forum Podcasts Skills Prac8ce Tools Collabora8on tools Designs Produc8ons
Co-creating new pedagogies
•
Import exis8ng learning designs
•
Use advice and guidance
•
Consider alterna8ve designs
•
Adapt the design to own context
•
Analyse the designs
Import an exis8ng learning design
Co-creating new pedagogies
Adapt an exis8ng learning design
Consider advice and guidance on adapta8on
Consider alterna8ve
Analysing the design
Interpreted in
terms of the
Conversa8onal
Framework
Contras8ng
teacher workload
for own design
and reuse
Re-designing
Use drop-‐down menu to
change teaching-‐
learning ac8vi8es and
analyse effect on
learning experience and
teacher 8me
Sharing…
Once tested and evaluated
with students, export
(with metadata) to shared
folder, website,
community library, open
repository…
Comments on the approach
•
Teachers respond posi8vely to the Learning Designer tools
and see this as a way of improving teaching, and poten8ally of
saving 8me
•
The Learning Designer concepts of sharing designs, reuse,
adaptaAon, advice on TEL, analysis of the learning experience,
suggesAons of design alternaAves, and categorisaAon of
designs, were all welcomed by teachers
•
Teachers commented on the added value of the detailed
descrip8ons of pedagogy, which enable them to have a more
in-‐depth conversa8on about their prac8ce and what makes a
learning design more effec8ve
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 20th C 21st C 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 20th C 21st C
From 20
th
C to 21
st
C teacher?
Teachers’ activitiesModelling learning experience
and teacher workload
How can we estimate the effects of the decisions we
make as we plan a course?
We select the set of teaching and learning activities
we intend to use
These have consequences for the
pedagogical
benefits
, and the comparative costs in terms of
teachers’ workload
The next slide shows how the intervening assumptions
join up the decisions and consequences
Define the type of learning each TLA offers
Select Teaching-‐Learning Ac8vi8es (TLAs):
wiki, simula8on, e-‐pordolio
Decide group size for each
TLA
Decide Teacher Time needed to prepare and
present each TLA
Distribute learning hours across the
selected TLAs Distribu8on of learner
8me across types of learning experienced
Teacher 8me for: Design and prepara8on Class and online presenta8on
Marking and learner support Input total credit hours, size of cohort
Acquisi8on Inquiry Discussion Prac8ce Produc8on
Comparison of
pedagogical benefits
, and
costs in terms of
teachers’ workload
Acquisi8on Inquiry Discussion Prac8ce Produc8on Acquisi8on Inquiry Discussion Prac8ce Produc8on
Yr 1 Yr 2 Typical
15 15 30 3.5 1.8 1.2
Yr 1 Yr 2 Typical
15 15 30 5.2 2.3 0.4 Student numbers Teacher hrs per student
Conventional Blended More ac8ve learning
Lower per capita costs
in a typical year for
large numbers
Modelling the costs for
increasing student cohort size
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 30 60 90 120 150 Conven8onal Open Mode Teacher days per student Cohort size
What issues must the Learning
Designer also address?
•
Complexity
•
Poten8ally a tool of management control
•
Interpretability of analysis
•
The need for a topic-‐oriented focus
“It’s very overwhelming … there’s a lot going on and to think about. I’m not sure what all the terms mean. I mean I don’t understand the difference between produc8on and prac8ce. Let’s have a look […] Yes – OK – I get it. Yes I see the difference. Probably we need a bit more help here with explana8ons and examples. But once you get into the tool it isn’t so difficult”
“My only worry is that it [the Learning Designer] turns into an insAtuAonal requisite rather than an opAon. It becomes a measurement tool, rather than a useful organisaAonal tool that allows some criAcal self reflecAon on pracAce. I know that the goal is the laLer, but soMware, once out there, can become so seducAve to gather informaAon for departments, policy makers, etc, and the informaAon that is produced is probably ONLY useful for individual teachers, not educaAon ministers, etc”
“I think it's cute to have pie charts, it's neat [...] I would go back and squidge my stuff, reorganise my 8me because I would know that it would be a good thing to have a mix of all of these things (i.e. forms of learning). But that's because I think it's a good thing. If I didn't believe that this was a
good thing, then you would show me a pie chart that was 90% of one thing I would s8ll think it's ok”
“My problem with the tool is that the pedagogy is neutral of
the topic while the approach to teaching and learning requires a topic approach and this tool doesn’t help with this approach”
Teachers as innovative
co-creators of technology-based
pedagogies
Features of teaching as ‘a design science’:
•
Teachers adop8ng, adap8ng, tes8ng, improving,
sharing learning designs
•
Teaching as collabora8ve learning, supported by
online collabora8ve design tools and repositories
•
A theory-‐based computa8onal representa8on of
pedagogic design and teacher workload that
migrates across subjects
Further details…
Teaching as a Design
Science: Building
pedagogical patterns for
learning and
technology(Routledge,
2012)
The LDSE project team
IOE/LKL
Brock Craft (RF) Diana Laurillard (PI) Dejan Ljubojevic (RF)
Oxford
Liz Masterman (CoPI) Marion Manton (CoPI) Joanna Wild (RF)
Birkbeck/LKL
George Magooulas (CoPI) Patricia Charlton
Dionisis Dimakopoulos
LondonMet
Tom Boyle (CoPI)
LSE
Steve Ryan (CoPI) Ed Whitley
Roser Pujadas (PhD Student)
RVC
Kim Whittlestone (CoPI) Stephen May