• No results found

Are you sure that s beef in your burger?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Are you sure that s beef in your burger?"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Are you sure that’s

beef in your burger?

Giving you confidence in the

performance of your supply chain

PwC’s supplier risk

management services

(2)

The recent horse meat substitution scandal is just one example

of what can go wrong when companies fail to properly manage

supplier risk. Today, supply chains typically include multiple

partners, with services and sourcing managed across several

centres/ organisations in different jurisdictions. With this in mind:

Complex

arrangements

realise new

risks

Traditionally, supplier risk

management focused on identifying

and mitigating factors that had the

potential to disrupt the value chain.

However, the extent and complexity

of recent sourcing/outsourcing

arrangements has increased the

likelihood of these risks being realised.

Some of these risks may include:

Corporates are increasing their use of third-party suppliers in the

execution of key strategic imperatives. In many cases, these sourcing

and/or offshoring activities are becoming more extensive and

sophisticated in order to capture the next level of service delivery,

processing efficiency and/or cost savings. However, unless your

supplier risk management framework has also evolved, you could

face unexpected risks and not capitalise on the potential benefits.

How do you achieve confidence

in the performance of your supply

chain through effective supplier

risk management?

Reputational risk. The risk to your organisation’s reputation due to a service or supply interruption, a supplier quality failure, or a supplier’s business practices – for example, an overseas supplier with substandard employment arrangements (ie social or ethical) or involvement with unlawful practices (ie inappropriate commissions or facilitation payments).

Resilience risk. The risk that a supplier failure results in an interruption to customer service, sometimes immediate – for example, an IT failure that prevents customers from placing orders or interacting with your business online or a materials supplier is unable to deliver the purchased materials which prevents the ability to sell the anticipated amount of finished products.

Information security and privacy. The risk that sensitive data, including customer data, is compromised by a cyber security breach or failure in a supplier company (or a supplier’s supplier).

Regulatory risk. The risk of non-compliance with the regulatory requirements and/or commercial undertakings associated with sourcing/outsourcing/offshoring arrangements in the jurisdictions in which you operate.

Commercial risk. The risk of financial loss or cost overruns from poorly managed sourcing/outsourcing arrangements or supplier failures, and inaccurate billing from outsourced parties for the services provided.

Regardless of the supply, sourcing/outsourcing arrangements can involve multiple supplier relationships that are not visible to the end-client, for example, responsible third parties further sourcing/outsourcing to fourth and fifth parties. While this approach has produced real business benefits, it has also given rise to new exposures to risk in the form of supply chain disruptions and long-lasting financial/reputational damage through supplier failures. Refer to Figure 1.1 for further details.

(3)

Suppliers making headlines for the wrong reasons

Regulators in Australia and overseas have responded by intensifying their scrutiny of sourcing/outsourcing arrangements, making it more important than ever to have a comprehensive supplier risk management regime in place. We are continually seeing examples of this in the market place and making headlines for the wrong reasons. For example, data centre outages halt airline check-in and reservations, unethical and inadequate practices at offshore suppliers resulting in criminal investigations, and extensive delays in the supply of goods and services, amongst others.

Managing risk while maximising value

What is needed is an overall framework that enables you to manage supplier risk throughout the sourcing lifecycle. A supplier risk management framework not only offers increased levels of control, it can also help your organisation maximise value by offering:

• a more reliable and consistent process for managing supplier risk

• competitive differentiation through a transparent purchasing policy that supports your corporate social responsibility guidelines

• increased operational efficiency and reduced costs through centralised contract management

• an enhanced ability to outsource non-core activities and partner with strategic suppliers on key activities

• a reduced need to replace failed suppliers.

The objective is to encourage cost effective sourcing while ensuring the risks and accountability for end-to-end sourcing and service delivery are clearly defined, managed, monitored and understood by both your organisation and your suppliers.

Figure 1.1:

Possible supply chain risks

• Supplier financial failure • Shortage of materials • Natural hazards • Terrorism • Poor management • Key dependencies on

personnel/suppliers • Child labour

• Ethical practices • Health and Safety • Resource

consumption • Waste

• Reputation/brand • Compliance • Macro economic • Geopolitical • Investment • Legal/regulatory • IP/counterfeiting • Change programmes • Market changes

• Demand planning • Quality standards • Logistics

• Contracts

• Delivery performance and lead times • Controls • Security • Exchange rates

(volatility)

• Raw material prices • Energy prices • Penalties

• Accuracy of billing • Commercial • Competition • Labour costs

Socia

l, ethi cal &

envi

ronm

ental Financia

l O pe ra tio na l St ra te gi c

Supply

chain

risks

Continuity

(4)

Horse meat

crisis hits

food industry

An international FMCG company asked PwC for help in

understanding the key economic, social and environmental risks facing its food (including meat) and commodity supply chains.

Case study:

The client adopted a new approach to supply chain management, redesigning its strategy, structure and processes to create a robust supplier risk management framework. We developed a range of options to mitigate potential risks

and reduce the business’s long-term exposure, including:

• risk profiling and assessing their supply chain to identify and quantify key sources of risk, dependency and vulnerability

• forensic investigations to identify what may have gone wrong and why

• performing controls and supplier audits and due diligence work to provide assurance as required

• deploying risk monitoring solutions to ensure compliance with agreed standards

• redesigning the supply chain structure, strategy and organisation to optimise between cost and resilience.

We also helped the client develop a detailed understanding of retailers’ requirements so they could focus on the key drivers that were pertinent to their relationships.

The client

Our solution

The outcome

The recent horse meat substitution scandal has shaken the global food industry and raised serious questions about supplier risk management in a sector characterised by increasingly complex and internationalised value chains.

(5)

To help you create a supplier risk management framework, we offer

the following questions for you to consider throughout the process:

Is your organisation managing

supplier risk effectively?

Getting the

conversation started

• Do you have clear visability of all stages and suppliers in your supply chain? • Does management routinely

require suppliers to provide details of their own sourcing/outsourcing and offshoring arrangements? • Do you regularly

monitor the operational, ethical and financial risk and performance of your suppliers? • How are you assured that

your supply chain complies with the relevant regulatory and legal requirements? • Does management take a risk-based approach to assessing and managing supply chain risk?

• How are you assured by management that you are operating within your supplier/ offshoring/ outsourcing risk appetite? • Are you confident you

can respond to any supply chain disruption without unacceptable loss? • Are you confident that you

are not being defrauded by employees and/or suppliers? • Do you receive robust

assurance that all key risks are managed in your supply chain?

Benefits of getting it right

• Resilience and confidence in your supply chain –

achieved through increased knowledge of supplier risk and performance, and through effective assurance mechanisms.

• Enhancement of quality and reliability of the end product sold, and the ability to identify and remedy problems which may arise within the supply chain.

• Ability to manage crises effectively using streamlined investigative responses and successful claims management.

• Greater knowledge of social and environmental practices and standards throughout your supply chain.

• Ownership of an early warning surveillance system based on forward looking risk indicators to provide predictive risk monitoring and assist with crisis avoidance.

• Compliance with regulatory requirements.

The way forward

There is an expectation by both boards and shareholders that companies be more proactive in response to, and better understand, their supply chain risks. There is also an increasing appetite for a more coordinated, strategic approach to supply chain risk, one which takes a holistic view to identify, monitor, and mitigate weak links in the chain.

Awareness of supplier risk, and the need for a comprehensive framework, presents a great opportunity for organisations to better understand and work with their suppliers.

(6)

Sydney

Chelsea Buffam +61 (2) 8266 0347

[email protected]

Adelaide

Kim Cheater +61 (8) 8218 7407 [email protected]

Brisbane

Darren Griffiths

+61 (7) 3257 8276

[email protected]

Canberra

Adam Wood +61 (2) 6271 3666 [email protected]

Melbourne

Clare Power +61 (3) 8603 2360 [email protected]

Perth

Cameron Jones +61 (8) 9238 3375

[email protected]

National

Christopher Daniell

National Systems and Process Assurance Leader

+ 61 (2) 8266 1682

[email protected]

Gavin Rosettenstein

National Driver

Supplier Risk Management

+61 (2) 8266 8869

[email protected]

To find out more information on how you can manage your supplier

risk while maximising the value, contact one of our team today.

(7)

pwc.com.au

© 2013 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved.

PwC refers to the Australian member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors.

Figure

Figure 1.1: Possible supply chain risks

References

Related documents

The overarching question of how rock type may influence the volume, style, and frequency of landsliding along the Santa Barbara coastline is explored and, when considering

The benefits of water restoration are both environmental and economic - €270 million in gross output can be captured between 2015 and 2030 for an average municipality..

Both Alfredo Véa’s Gods Go Begging (1999) and Linda Hogan’s People of the Whale (2009) introduce a diverse range of voices and experiences in order to re-imagine the

assessments, which would make costs rise at large institutions. Furthermore, I think it is extremely hard to put a “tag” on prior learning and how that relates to classes. When I

• Basics fundamentals of Lean Six Sigma philosophy • Practical applications of Lean Six Sigma in a sterile.

• Writ Writ e a question (or a e a question (or a block of questions) that should block of questions) that should be added to the be added to the survey to capture that aspect in

Similarities and differences for informal and formal learning are discussed and used to define the recommendation goal that recommender systems in informal learning networks have