• No results found

Introduction to MapReduce

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Introduction to MapReduce"

Copied!
120
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Introduction to MapReduce

Jerome Simeon

IBM Watson Research

Content  obtained  from  many  sources,

(2)

Our Plan Today

1.  Background: Cloud and distributed computing 2.  Foundations of MapReduce

3.  Back to functional programming

4.  MapReduce Concretely

(3)
(4)

“Big Ideas”

¢  Scale “out”, not “up”

l  Limits of SMP and large shared-memory machines

¢  Move processing to the data

l  Cluster have limited bandwidth

¢  Process data sequentially, avoid random access

l  Seeks are expensive, disk throughput is reasonable

¢  Seamless scalability

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

Building Blocks

(10)

Storage Hierarchy

Funny story about sense of scale…

(11)

Storage Hierarchy

Funny story about sense of scale…

(12)

Anatomy of a Datacenter

(13)

Why commodity machines?

(14)

What about communication?

¢  Nodes need to talk to each other!

l  SMP: latencies ~100 ns

l  LAN: latencies ~100 µs

¢  Scaling “up” vs. scaling “out”

l  Smaller cluster of SMP machines vs. larger cluster of commodity

machines

l  E.g., 8 128-core machines vs. 128 8-core machines

l  Note: no single SMP machine is big enough

¢  Let’s model communication overhead…

(15)

Modeling Communication Costs

¢  Simple execution cost model:

l  Total cost = cost of computation + cost to access global data

l  Fraction of local access inversely proportional to size of cluster

l  n nodes (ignore cores for now)

l  Light communication: f =1

l  Medium communication: f =10

l  Heavy communication: f =100

¢  What are the costs in parallelization?

(16)
(17)

Advantages of scaling “up”

(18)

Seeks vs. Scans

¢  Consider a 1 TB database with 100 byte records

l  We want to update 1 percent of the records

¢  Scenario 1: random access

l  Each update takes ~30 ms (seek, read, write)

l  108 updates = ~35 days

¢  Scenario 2: rewrite all records

l  Assume 100 MB/s throughput

l  Time = 5.6 hours(!)

¢  Lesson: avoid random seeks!

(19)

Justifying the “Big Ideas”

¢  Scale “out”, not “up”

l  Limits of SMP and large shared-memory machines

¢  Move processing to the data

l  Cluster have limited bandwidth

¢  Process data sequentially, avoid random access

l  Seeks are expensive, disk throughput is reasonable

¢  Seamless scalability

(20)

Numbers Everyone Should Know*

L1 cache reference 0.5 ns

Branch mispredict 5 ns

L2 cache reference 7 ns

Mutex lock/unlock 25 ns

Main memory reference 100 ns

Send 2K bytes over 1 Gbps network 20,000 ns

Read 1 MB sequentially from memory 250,000 ns

Round trip within same datacenter 500,000 ns

Disk seek 10,000,000 ns

Read 1 MB sequentially from disk 20,000,000 ns

Send packet CA → Netherlands → CA 150,000,000 ns

(21)
(22)

What Is ?

ñ Distributed computing framework

- For clusters of computers

- Thousands of Compute Nodes - Petabytes of data

ñ Open source, Java

ñ Google’s MapReduce inspired Yahoo’s Hadoop.

(23)

Map and Reduce

ñ The idea of Map, and Reduce is 40+ year old

-  Present in all Functional Programming Languages. -  See, e.g., APL, Lisp and ML

ñ Alternate names for Map: Apply-All ñ Higher Order Functions

-  take function definitions as arguments, or -  return a function as output

(24)

Map: A Higher Order Function

ñ F(x: int) returns r: int

ñ Let V be an array of integers. ñ W = map(F, V)

- W[i] = F(V[i]) for all I

(25)

Map Examples in Haskell

ñ map (+1) [1,2,3,4,5] == [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

ñ map (toLower) "abcDEFG12!@#“ == "abcdefg12!@#“

ñ map (`mod` 3) [1..10]

(26)

reduce: A Higher Order Function

ñ reduce also known as fold, accumulate,

compress or inject

ñ Reduce/fold takes in a function and folds it in between the elements of a list.

(27)

Fold-Left in Haskell

ñ Definition - foldl f z [] = z - foldl f z (x:xs) = foldl f (f z x) xs ñ Examples - foldl (+) 0 [1..5] ==15 - foldl (+) 10 [1..5] == 25 - foldl (div) 7 [34,56,12,4,23] == 0

(28)

Fold-Right in Haskell

ñ Definition - foldr f z [] = z - foldr f z (x:xs) = f x (foldr f z xs) ñ Example - foldr (div) 7 [34,56,12,4,23] == 8

(29)

Examples of

(30)

Word Count Example

ñ Read text files and count how often words occur.

- The input is text files - The output is a text file

ñ each line: word, tab, count

ñ Map: Produce pairs of (word, count = 1) from files

ñ Reduce: For each word, sum up up the counts (i.e., fold).

(31)

Grep Example

ñ Search input files for a given pattern ñ Map: emits a line if pattern is matched ñ Reduce: Copies results to output

(32)

Inverted Index Example

(this was the original Google's usecase)

ñ Generate an inverted index of words from a given set of files

ñ Map: parses a document and emits <word, docId> pairs

ñ Reduce: takes all pairs for a given word, sorts the docId values, and emits a <word, list(docId)> pair

(33)

MapReduce principle

applied to BigData

(34)

Adapt MapReduce for BigData

1.  Always maps/reduces on list of key/value pairs 2.  Map/Reduce execute in parallel on a cluster

3.  Fault tolerance is built in the framework

4.  Specific systems/implementation aspects matters –  How is data partitioned as input to map

–  How is data serialized between processes 5.  Cloud specific improvements:

–  Handle elasticity

–  Take cluster topology (e.g., node proximity, node size) into account

(35)

Execution on Clusters

1.  Input files split (M splits) 2.  Assign Master & Workers 3.  Map tasks

4.  Writing intermediate data to disk (R regions)

5.  Intermediate data read & sort 6.  Reduce tasks

(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)

Data Flow in a MapReduce

Program in Hadoop

InputFormat Map function Partitioner

Sorting & Merging Combiner Shuffling Merging Reduce function OutputFormat à 1:many

(40)

Map/Reduce Cluster

Implementation

split 0 split 1 split 2 split 3 split 4 Output 0 Output 1 Input files Output files M map

tasks Intermediate files R reduce tasks

Several map or reduce tasks can run on a single computer

Each intermediate file is divided into R partitions, by

partitioning function

Each reduce task corresponds to one partition

(41)
(42)

Automatic Parallel Execution in

MapReduce (Google)

Handles failures automatically, e.g., restarts tasks if a node fails; runs multiples copies of the same task to avoid a slow

(43)
(44)

Fault Recovery

ñ Workers are pinged by master periodically

- Non-responsive workers are marked as failed - All tasks in-progress or completed by failed

worker become eligible for rescheduling

ñ Master could periodically checkpoint

- Current implementations abort on master failure

(45)
(46)

ñ http://hadoop.apache.org/ ñ Open source Java

ñ Scale

- Thousands of nodes and - petabytes of data

ñ 27 December, 2011: release 1.0.0

(47)

Hadoop

ñ MapReduce and Distributed File System framework for large commodity clusters ñ Master/Slave relationship

- JobTracker handles all scheduling & data flow between TaskTrackers

- TaskTracker handles all worker tasks on a node

- Individual worker task runs map or reduce operation

(48)

Hadoop Supported File Systems

ñ HDFS: Hadoop's own file system. ñ Amazon S3 file system.

-  Targeted at clusters hosted on the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud server-on-demand infrastructure -  Not rack-aware

ñ CloudStore

-  previously Kosmos Distributed File System -  like HDFS, this is rack-aware.

ñ FTP Filesystem

-  stored on remote FTP servers.

(49)

"Rack awareness"

ñ optimization which takes into account the geographic clustering of servers

ñ network traffic between servers in different geographic clusters is minimized.

(50)

Goals of HDFS

Very Large Distributed File System

– 10K nodes, 100 million files, 10 PB Assumes Commodity Hardware

– Files are replicated to handle hardware failure – Detect failures and recovers from them

Optimized for Batch Processing

– Data locations exposed so that computations can move to where data resides

– Provides very high aggregate bandwidth

(51)

HDFS: Hadoop Distr File System

ñ Designed to scale to petabytes of storage, and run on top of the file systems of the underlying OS.

ñ Master (“NameNode”) handles replication, deletion, creation

ñ Slave (“DataNode”) handles data retrieval ñ Files stored in many blocks

- Each block has a block Id

- Block Id associated with several nodes hostname:port (depending on level of replication)

(52)

Secondary NameNode Client HDFS Architecture NameNode DataNodes 2. BlckId, Da taNodes o 3.Read data Cluster Membership Cluster Membership

NameNode : Maps a file to a file-id and list of MapNodes DataNode : Maps a block-id to a physical location on disk SecondaryNameNode: Periodic merge of Transaction log

(53)

Distributed File System

Single Namespace for entire cluster Data Coherency

– Write-once-read-many access model – Client can only append to existing files

Files are broken up into blocks

– Typically 128 MB block size

– Each block replicated on multiple DataNodes

Intelligent Client

– Client can find location of blocks

(54)
(55)

NameNode Metadata

Meta-data in Memory

– The entire metadata is in main memory – No demand paging of meta-data

Types of Metadata

– List of files

– List of Blocks for each file

– List of DataNodes for each block

– File attributes, e.g creation time, replication factor

A Transaction Log

(56)

DataNode

A Block Server

– Stores data in the local file system (e.g. ext3) – Stores meta-data of a block (e.g. CRC)

– Serves data and meta-data to Clients

Block Report

– Periodically sends a report of all existing blocks to the NameNode

Facilitates Pipelining of Data

(57)

Block Placement

Current Strategy

-- One replica on local node

-- Second replica on a remote rack -- Third replica on same remote rack

-- Additional replicas are randomly placed

Clients read from nearest replica

(58)

Data Correctness

Use Checksums to validate data

– Use CRC32

File Creation

– Client computes checksum per 512 byte

– DataNode stores the checksum

File access

– Client retrieves the data and checksum from

DataNode

(59)

NameNode Failure

A single point of failure

Transaction Log stored in multiple directories

– A directory on the local file system

– A directory on a remote file system (NFS/CIFS)

(60)

Data Pipelining

Client retrieves a list of DataNodes on which to place replicas of a block

Client writes block to the first DataNode

The first DataNode forwards the data to the next DataNode in the Pipeline

When all replicas are written, the Client moves on to write the next block in file

(61)

Rebalancer

Goal: % disk full on DataNodes should be similar

Usually run when new DataNodes are added Cluster is online when Rebalancer is active

Rebalancer is throttled to avoid network congestion Command line tool

(62)

Hadoop v. ‘MapReduce’

ñ MapReduce is also the name of a framework developed by Google

ñ Hadoop was initially developed by Yahoo and now part of the Apache group.

ñ Hadoop was inspired by Google's

MapReduce and Google File System (GFS) papers.

(63)

MapReduce v. Hadoop

MapReduce Hadoop

Org Google Yahoo/Apache

Impl C++ Java

Distributed

File Sys GFS HDFS

Data Base Bigtable HBase Distributed

(64)

wordCount

A Simple Hadoop Example

(65)

Word Count Example

ñ Read text files and count how often words occur.

- The input is text files - The output is a text file

ñ each line: word, tab, count

ñ Map: Produce pairs of (word, count) ñ Reduce: For each word, sum up the

(66)

Word Count over a Given Set of Web

Pages

see bob throw see 1

bob 1 throw 1 see 1 spot 1 run 1 bob 1 run 1 see 2 spot 1 throw 1

see spot run

(67)

WordCount Overview

3 import ...

12 public class WordCount { 13

14 public static class Map extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper ... {

17

18 public void map ...

26 }

27

28 public static class Reduce extends MapReduceBase implements Reducer ... {

29

30 public void reduce ...

37 }

38

39 public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {

40 JobConf conf = new JobConf(WordCount.class);

41 ...

53 FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0]));

54 FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(args[1]));

55

56 JobClient.runJob(conf);

57 }

58 59 }

(68)

wordCount Reducer

28 public static class Reduce extends MapReduceBase implements Reducer<Text, IntWritable, Text, IntWritable> {

29

30 public void reduce(Text key, Iterator<IntWritable> values, OutputCollector<Text, IntWritable> output,

Reporter reporter) throws IOException { 31 int sum = 0; 32 while (values.hasNext()) { 33 sum += values.next().get(); 34 }

35 output.collect(key, new IntWritable(sum)); 36 }

(69)

wordCount JobConf

40 JobConf conf = new JobConf(WordCount.class); 41 conf.setJobName("wordcount"); 42 43 conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); 44 conf.setOutputValueClass(IntWritable.class); 45 46 conf.setMapperClass(Map.class); 47 conf.setCombinerClass(Reduce.class); 48 conf.setReducerClass(Reduce.class); 49 50 conf.setInputFormat(TextInputFormat.class); 51 conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class);

(70)

WordCount main

39 public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { 40 JobConf conf = new JobConf(WordCount.class); 41 conf.setJobName("wordcount"); 42 43 conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); 44 conf.setOutputValueClass(IntWritable.class); 45 46 conf.setMapperClass(Map.class); 47 conf.setCombinerClass(Reduce.class); 48 conf.setReducerClass(Reduce.class); 49 50 conf.setInputFormat(TextInputFormat.class); 51 conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); 52

53 FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); 54 FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(args[1])); 55

56 JobClient.runJob(conf); 57 }

(71)

Invocation of wordcount

1.  /usr/local/bin/hadoop dfs -mkdir <hdfs-dir>

2.  /usr/local/bin/hadoop dfs -copyFromLocal <local-dir> <hdfs-dir> 3.  /usr/local/bin/hadoop jar hadoop-*-examples.jar wordcount [-m <#maps>] [-r <#reducers>] <in-dir> <out-dir>

(72)

Lifecycle of a MapReduce Job

Map function

Reduce function

Run this program as a MapReduce job

(73)

Map

Wave 1 Wave 2 Map Reduce Wave 1 Reduce Wave 2 Input

Splits

Lifecycle of a MapReduce Job

Time

How are the number of splits, number of map and reduce

(74)

Job Configuration Parameters

190+ parameters in Hadoop

Set manually or defaults are used

(75)

Mechanics of Programming

Hadoop Jobs

(76)

Job Launch: Client

ñ Client program creates a JobConf

- Identify classes implementing Mapper and

Reducer interfaces

ñ setMapperClass(), setReducerClass()

- Specify inputs, outputs

ñ setInputPath(), setOutputPath()

- Optionally, other options too:

(77)

Job Launch: JobClient

ñ Pass JobConf to

- JobClient.runJob() // blocks

- JobClient.submitJob() // does not block

ñ JobClient:

- Determines proper division of input into

InputSplits

(78)

Job Launch: JobTracker

ñ JobTracker:

- Inserts jar and JobConf (serialized to XML) in shared location

(79)

Job Launch: TaskTracker

ñ TaskTrackers running on slave nodes periodically query JobTracker for work ñ Retrieve job-specific jar and config

ñ Launch task in separate instance of Java

(80)

Job Launch: Task

ñ TaskTracker.Child.main():

- Sets up the child TaskInProgress attempt - Reads XML configuration

- Connects back to necessary MapReduce components via RPC

(81)

Job Launch: TaskRunner

ñ TaskRunner, MapTaskRunner,

MapRunner work in a daisy-chain to

launch Mapper

- Task knows ahead of time which InputSplits it should be mapping

- Calls Mapper once for each record retrieved from the InputSplit

(82)

Creating the Mapper

ñ Your instance of Mapper should extend

MapReduceBase

ñ One instance of your Mapper is initialized by the MapTaskRunner for a

TaskInProgress

- Exists in separate process from all other instances of Mapper – no data sharing!

(83)

Mapper

void map ( WritableComparable key, Writable value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter )

(84)

What is Writable?

ñ Hadoop defines its own “box” classes for strings (Text), integers (IntWritable), etc. ñ All values are instances of Writable

ñ All keys are instances of

(85)

Writing For Cache Coherency

while (more input exists) {

myIntermediate = new intermediate(input); myIntermediate.process();

export outputs; }

(86)

Getting Data To The Mapper

Input file

InputSplit InputSplit InputSplit InputSplit

Input file

RecordReader RecordReader RecordReader RecordReader

Mapper (intermediates) Mapper (intermediates) Mapper (intermediates) Mapper (intermediates) In pu tF or m at

(87)

Reading Data

ñ Data sets are specified by InputFormats

- Defines input data (e.g., a directory)

- Identifies partitions of the data that form an InputSplit

- Factory for RecordReader objects to extract (k, v) records from the input source

(88)

FileInputFormat and Friends

ñ TextInputFormat

-  Treats each ‘\n’-terminated line of a file as a value

ñ KeyValueTextInputFormat

-  Maps ‘\n’- terminated text lines of “k SEP v”

ñ SequenceFileInputFormat

-  Binary file of (k, v) pairs with some add’l metadata

ñ SequenceFileAsTextInputFormat

(89)

Filtering File Inputs

ñ FileInputFormat will read all files out of a specified directory and send them to the mapper

ñ Delegates filtering this file list to a method subclasses may override

- e.g., Create your own “xyzFileInputFormat” to read *.xyz from directory list

(90)

Record Readers

ñ Each InputFormat provides its own

RecordReader implementation

- Provides (unused?) capability multiplexing

ñ LineRecordReader

- Reads a line from a text file

ñ KeyValueRecordReader

(91)

Input Split Size

ñ FileInputFormat will divide large files into chunks

- Exact size controlled by mapred.min.split.size

ñ RecordReaders receive file, offset, and length of chunk

ñ Custom InputFormat implementations may override split size

(92)

Sending Data To Reducers

ñ Map function receives OutputCollector object

- OutputCollector.collect() takes (k, v) elements

ñ Any (WritableComparable, Writable) can be used

(93)

WritableComparator

ñ Compares WritableComparable data

- Will call WritableComparable.compare() - Can provide fast path for serialized data

(94)

Sending Data To The Client

ñ Reporter object sent to Mapper allows simple asynchronous feedback

- incrCounter(Enum key, long amount) - setStatus(String msg)

ñ Allows self-identification of input

(95)

Partition And Shuffle

Mapper (intermediates) Mapper (intermediates) Mapper (intermediates) Mapper (intermediates)

Reducer Reducer Reducer

(intermediates) (intermediates) (intermediates)

Partitioner Partitioner Partitioner Partitioner

sh

uf

fli

(96)

Partitioner

ñ int getPartition(key, val, numPartitions)

- Outputs the partition number for a given key - One partition == values sent to one Reduce

task

ñ HashPartitioner used by default

- Uses key.hashCode() to return partition num

(97)

Reduction

ñ reduce( WritableComparable key, Iterator values,

OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter)

ñ Keys & values sent to one partition all go to the same reduce task

ñ Calls are sorted by key – “earlier” keys are reduced and output before “later” keys

(98)

Finally: Writing The Output

Reducer Reducer Reducer

RecordWriter RecordWriter RecordWriter

output file output file output file

O ut pu tF or m at

(99)

OutputFormat

ñ Analogous to InputFormat ñ TextOutputFormat

- Writes “key val\n” strings to output file

ñ SequenceFileOutputFormat

- Uses a binary format to pack (k, v) pairs

ñ NullOutputFormat

(100)
(101)

HDFS Limitations

ñ “Almost” GFS (Google FS)

- No file update options (record append, etc); all files are write-once

ñ Does not implement demand replication ñ Designed for streaming

(102)

NameNode

ñ “Head” interface to HDFS cluster ñ Records all global metadata

(103)

Secondary NameNode

ñ Not a failover NameNode!

ñ Records metadata snapshots from “real” NameNode

- Can merge update logs in flight

(104)

NameNode Death

ñ No new requests can be served while NameNode is down

- Secondary will not fail over as new primary

(105)

NameNode Death, cont’d

ñ If NameNode dies from software glitch, just reboot

ñ But if machine is hosed, metadata for cluster is irretrievable!

(106)

Bringing the Cluster Back

ñ If original NameNode can be restored, secondary can re-establish the most current metadata snapshot

ñ If not, create a new NameNode, use secondary to copy metadata to new primary, restart whole cluster ( L ) ñ Is there another way…?

(107)

Keeping the Cluster Up

ñ Problem: DataNodes “fix” the address of the NameNode in memory, can’t switch in flight

ñ Solution: Bring new NameNode up, but use DNS to make cluster believe it’s the original one

(108)

Further Reliability Measures

ñ Namenode can output multiple copies of metadata files to different directories

- Including an NFS mounted one

- May degrade performance; watch for NFS locks

(109)

Making Hadoop Work

ñ Basic configuration involves pointing nodes at master machines

- mapred.job.tracker - fs.default.name

- dfs.data.dir, dfs.name.dir - hadoop.tmp.dir

- mapred.system.dir

ñ See “Hadoop Quickstart” in online documentation

(110)

Configuring for Performance

ñ Configuring Hadoop performed in “base JobConf” in conf/hadoop-site.xml

ñ Contains 3 different categories of settings

- Settings that make Hadoop work - Settings for performance

(111)

Configuring for Performance

ñ Configuring Hadoop performed in “base JobConf” in conf/hadoop-site.xml

ñ Contains 3 different categories of settings

- Settings that make Hadoop work - Settings for performance

(112)

Number of Tasks

ñ Controlled by two parameters:

- mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum - mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum

ñ Two degrees of freedom in mapper run time: Number of tasks/node, and size of InputSplits

ñ Current conventional wisdom: 2 map tasks/core, less for reducers

ñ See http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-hadoop/ HowManyMapsAndReduces

(113)

Dead Tasks

ñ Student jobs would “run away”, admin restart needed

ñ Very often stuck in huge shuffle process

- Students did not know about Partitioner class, may have had non-uniform distribution

- Did not use many Reducer tasks

- Lesson: Design algorithms to use Combiners where possible

(114)

Working With the Scheduler

ñ Remember: Hadoop has a FIFO job scheduler

- No notion of fairness, round-robin

ñ Design your tasks to “play well” with one another

- Decompose long tasks into several smaller ones which can be interleaved at Job level

(115)

Additional Languages &

Components

(116)

Hadoop and C++

ñ Hadoop Pipes

- Library of bindings for native C++ code - Operates over local socket connection

ñ Straight computation performance may be faster

ñ Downside: Kernel involvement and context switches

(117)

Hadoop and Python

ñ Option 1: Use Jython

- Caveat: Jython is a subset of full Python

(118)

HadoopStreaming

ñ Effectively allows shell pipe ‘|’ operator to be used with Hadoop

ñ You specify two programs for map and

reduce

- (+) stdin and stdout do the rest

- (-) Requires serialization to text, context switches…

(119)

Eclipse Plugin

ñ Support for Hadoop in Eclipse IDE

- Allows MapReduce job dispatch - Panel tracks live and recent jobs

ñ http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/ mapreducetools

(120)

References

ñ http://hadoop.apache.org/

ñ Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat,

MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. Usenix SDI '04, 2004.

http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi04/tech/

full_papers/dean/dean.pdf

ñ David DeWitt, Michael Stonebraker,

"MapReduce: A major step backwards“, craig-henderson.blogspot.com

ñ http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2008/01/

References

Related documents

Most companies recruit for full-time and internship positions, but some indicate Co-Op as a recruiting priority, while not attending Professional Practice

The Master Fund is authorised in Luxembourg as a specialised investment fund and is managed by a management company, Ress Capital Fund Management SA, who acts

This model posits four types of health beliefs that affect an individual’s health behavior, in this case, the decision to seek mental health services: perceived

In 2008, Florida’s legislature directed the Florida Energy Systems Consortium (FESC), and the State’s University and State College systems to develop applied research and

A complex network of growth factors and their receptors, signal transduction pathways and transcription factors that regulate the expression of lineage specific genes is involved

Customer Information Management (CIM): The Key to Successful CRM in Financial Services.. Reputation – Managing the single greatest risk facing

The average order picking tour lengths resulting from the exact algorithm and the three routing heuristics were compared to evaluate the performance of the routing

Subsequently, using logistic regression, I test democratic and capitalist arguments for peace through analyzing the dyadic militarized interstate disputes of developing