• No results found

Dynamic Infrastructure

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Dynamic Infrastructure"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Dynamic Infrastructure

Two Census Examples Terry Galloway Chief Technology Office

Census Scientific Advisory Meeting April 10, 2014

(2)

Dynamic Infrastructure

The key to a business and IT infrastructure that is "dynamic" is

leveraging technologies, service delivery and acquisition models that

optimize the infrastructure for efficiency and flexibility. By design,

every dynamic infrastructure is service-oriented and focused on

supporting and enabling the end users in a highly responsive way, and

allows for:

Enhanced performance

Scalability and elasticity

System availability and uptime

Visibility, control, and automation across all business and IT assets.

Managing and mitigating risks.

Utilization of alternative sourcing approaches (i.e. clouds, external

(3)

Census and Dynamic Infrastructure

The Centurion/Cloud and iCADE/Service Provider Census examples demonstrate how a Dynamic Infrastructure allows the Census to:

Provide a breakthrough service delivery approach that can enable the Bureau to reduce costs, improve service to the end users and better manage risk.

Leverage technologies, service delivery and acquisition models that optimize the infrastructure for efficiency and flexibility.

Enable innovation and change instead of constraining it.

The examples show how non-functional needs like enhanced performance and disaster recovery can be addressed with two distinct examples, respectively.

(4)

Centurion/Cloud Example

Functional Requirement: Self response internet capabilities for

2020 Census.

Performance Requirement: Possible peak load of 8 million

respondents per day within a 30 day period.

Problem Statement: The volumes needed to process the 2020

Decennial peak versus ACS and ECON Census (largest volumes

outside Decennial) have the potential to be over 100 times

greater. However, volume processing capability is needed for

approximately a 30-60 day period every 10 years.

(5)

Peak Daily Volume Comparison

Survey/Census 30 Day Peak Period

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

Controlled paper peak volume with 48 hr “Check-in to Scan” SLA.

0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2010 Check-in 2010 Deliver ECON Centurion ACS Centurion

(6)

Centurion/Cloud Example

Options:

1. Outsource overall internet processing to 3rd party vendor

2. Build out current Centurion infrastructure to meet processing needs

3. Place in-house Centurion application into a cloud environment *

Option 3: Centurion is the Census internet response data collection system, a mature

standard web application architecture used for ECON Census, American Community Survey (ACS), and over 40 current surveys. Plus used outside of Census for ….

Centurion is built upon a portable framework which allows the Census to implement an instance of the Centurion framework and database tier onto any amenable hardware

infrastructure. There are FedRamp approved cloud providers who have designed dynamic hardware specifically for service consumers who want to increase an applications scalability and elasticity capabilities to meet unknown and/or unusual high processing demands.

*This document is not choosing a particular option, it is showing how one particular option can be deployed to solve a problem by taking advantage of the characteristics of a “Dynamic Infrastructure”. Policy and security concerns exist for any option that does not house all processing within the physical confines of the Census Bureau.

(7)

iCADE/Service Provider Use Case

Functional Requirement: Self response paper capabilities for 2020 Census.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Requirement: Following a disruption (i.e. natural disaster) to the original site a DR site exists to allow for relocation of paper processing with agreed upon losses to normal operations.

Problem Statement: The capacity of the DR site may or may not match the capacity of the original site depending on the requirements. Other key considerations when

determining a DR site relate to the “Geographical disbursement question” and a risk assessment would need to be performed to include consideration of geographical location, physical location, labor force availability, central point of mail delivery, etc.

(8)

iCADE/Service Provider Use Case

Options:

1. Outsource overall paper-base processing to 3rd party vendor

2. Build out a second iCADE processing center

3. Contract with external service provider to provide DR solution for iCADE*

Option 3: iCADE, the Census paper response data collection system is a mature operation used internally for multiple current surveys. Plus used outside of Census for ….

The iCADE framework is based on standard paper-processing hardware. There are service providers specifically in the paper-data capture segment of the market who are built upon a cloud framework which supports back-up and recovery, with geographically disbursed data centers. iCADE can contract its DR capability to one of these providers and allows for the flexibility for them to have a “hot”, “cold”, or “warm” DR posture. Also, a cloud-based DR

infrastructure mitigates dependency to physical office space because telephone system, network infrastructure and workspace would be part of a hosted environment. This addresses the risk associated with geographical location and physical location; and provides the flexibility to establish some degree of virtual workspace for Census employees and/or a service

agreement that includes temporary labor force dependent upon Recovery Time Objectives.

*This document is not choosing a particular option, it is showing how one particular option can be deployed to solve a problem by taking advantage of the characteristics of a “Dynamic Infrastructure”. Policy and security concerns exist for any option that does not house all processing within the physical confines of the Census Bureau.

(9)

Panel Questions

1. Due to recent government data breaches and security concerns in general

which have cause agencies to be more risk-averse, what is your view of

the use of cloud computing in the federal agencies and what pitfalls would

you recommend an agency look out for?

2. Which scenario do you see as having a higher risk proposition considering

the fact of a high variance in our possible peak processing workload rate:

Scenario One - Deploying a proven and mature in-house web application

onto a proven internet cloud provider environment, or, Scenario Two -

Deploying a newly developed web application by proven third party

vendor onto a proven internet cloud provider environment?

3. Are there other use case scenarios relating to cloud and/or external

service provider options we should be exploring?

(10)

References

Related documents

It is clear that the school nurse situation in Oregon is in crisis, given the lack of school nurses and the poor nurse-to- student ratios in many school districts, increasing numbers

We describe the overall AWE concept and discuss the construction of the robot surface, its motion planning and its control, and all experiments run to this point.6. iii

The higher levels of pantothenic acid in cocoa and theobromine groups might be associated 412 with an enhanced fatty-acid metabolism that would partially explain the lower body

Volume 1 of the 2012 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual addresses the application and interpretation of the seismic provisions of the 2012 International Building Code.

It is assumed in Morgan and Stocken (2003) when they discuss partitional equilibria, but it is an implication of the model here. In any informative equilibrium of the game, there is

With the evolution of Internet Marketing and Search Engine Marketing over the last decade, various Web Analytics software applications have emerged that have provided some

The family and the person with dementia will need to agree that the driver's skills will need to be monitored and that, if and when it appears no longer safe for the person to