R E S E A R C H
Open Access
A converse to global exponential stability of a
class of difference equations
Yinghua Fu
1,2*, Qunfei Zhao
2and Lisheng Wang
2*Correspondence: [email protected] 1School of Optical-Electrical and
Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, P.R. China
2Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, P.R. China
Abstract
This paper discusses the global exponential stability of a class of difference equations. Sufficient and necessary conditions for the global exponential stability are derived. Particularly, the equivalent relationship between the global exponential stability of difference equations and the contractive property of the nonlinear operator of the systems is shown.
Keywords: global exponential stability; exponential bound; difference equations; strongly equivalent metric
1 Introduction
In mathematics and automatic control, an equation system is discussed as discrete or con-tinuous one with the type of input variables and linear or nonlinear one according to the relationship between the input and output. The stability of the equation systems always catches researchers’ eyes. The Lyapunov function is important for stability theory and con-trol theory, and its existence is a necessary and sufficient condition of stability for many differential equation systems. Linear systems received more attention than nonlinear sys-tems because of simplicity and controllability, and many good results are shown in the textbooks and literature. Bastinec [] gives the sufficient condition for exponential stabil-ity and estimation of solutions of linear differential systems with delay-dependence. Non-linear systems are of interest to researchers and engineers because most physical systems are inherently nonlinear in nature and difficult to solve. The converse Lyapunov problem on the stability of nonlinear discrete dynamical systems is developed and studied by many researchers (Gordon []; Ortega []; Mousaet al.[]; Jiang and Wang []; Wanget al.[]). Diblik [] considers a particular critical case and gives conditions for the stability of a zero solution of difference systems with quadratic nonlinearities using the method of Lyapunov functions and derives classes of stable systems. Furthermore, the author estimates the sta-bility domains as well. Berezansky [] considers the asymptotic convergence of solutions in discrete and difference equations with delay and gives strong sufficient conditions of the asymptotic convergence of all solutions without computing the limits of the solutions as
n→ ∞. It demonstrates that a difference equation is of exponential stability inRnif and
only if there is a Lyapunov function which is an abstract presentation of system energy (Mousaet al.[]; Jiang and Wang []; Wanget al.[]; Wanget al.[]). The inverse prob-lem of exponential stability instead of the inverse Lyapunov function has been considered from a different view in the recent literature (Wanget al.[]; Wang and Xu []).
Consider the following difference equation (Wanget al.[]; Wang and Xu []):
xk+=Txk, x∈D,k= , , , . . . , ()
whereD⊂Rnis a bounded closed set,T:D→Dis nonlinear and continuously
differen-tiable inD. ThenT is a Lipschitz continuous operator.x∗∈Dis the unique equilibrium point (fixed point). Wanget al.[], Wang and Xu [] show that system () is of expo-nential stability inDif and only ifT is contractive inDwith a certain strongly equivalent metric and also present a converse not only to the exponential stability of system () dif-ferent from the Lyapunov function, but also to the Banach contraction theorem different from the ones in Meyers [], Leader [], Opoitsev []. In other words, the two works show thatTis contractive inDwith a certain strongly equivalent metric if its iterative se-quence{xk}exponentially converges tox∗for any initial pointx∈D. The result is helpful to understand the exponential stability ofx*from a different view. However, Wanget al. [], Wang and Xu [] only consider nonlinear discrete dynamical systems in the bounded setD. The problem whether the result can be extended to difference equations in an un-bounded set still remains open. It is hard to answer for general difference equations.
This paper focuses on a class of important difference equations inRnshown as follows:
xk+=Txk, x∈Rn,k= , , , . . . , ()
where x∗∈Rnis the unique equilibrium point andT :Rn→Rnis a continuous differ-entiable nonlinear operator inRn, andlim
x→∞supT(x)=λ< holds for a positive constantλ(e.g., <λ< ). System () includes the discrete-time neural network model in Wang and Xu [] and difference equations in Wanget al.[], Wang and Xu [] as the spe-cial cases. The exponential stability of system () is developed and necessary and sufficient conditions to be exponentially stable inRn(namely, globally exponentially stable) are
de-rived. Particularly, we give the result that system () is of global exponential stability if and only ifTis contractive inRnwith a certain strongly equivalent metric. A simple method
to distinguish global exponential stability from global asymptotic stability is proposed. The results in this paper are helpful to discover some properties of the global exponential stability of system ().
2 Definition and main results
A nonlinear operatorT is Lipschitz continuous ifTx–Ty ≤M· x–yis satisfied for anyx,y∈Dand the given constantM(M> ), and contractive inE⊂Rnwith a strongly equivalent metricd(·,·) if there is a constant <β< such thatd(Tx,Ty)≤β·d(x,y) holds for anyx,y∈E. A metric functiond(·,·) :E×E→R+is a strongly equivalent metric with the vector norm · (or strongly equivalent with · ) in the setE⊂Rnif there are two
constantsC≥C> such that for anyx,y∈E, the following inequalities hold (Wang and Xu []):
C·d(x,y)≤ x–y ≤C·d(x,y). ()
The equilibrium point of some operator (for example, () or ()) is globally asymptotically stable inRnif it is stable in the sense of Lyapunov andlim
And it is exponentially stable in the setE⊂Rnif there are constantsM> and <α<
such that for any initial pointxinEand the positive integerk,
xk–x∗≤M·αk·x–x∗. ()
Letbe the set of all equivalent norms of · ,be the set of all strongly equivalent metrics of · inE⊂Rnandbe the set of all topologically equivalent metrics of · inE. Then the inclusion relationship⊂⊂is satisfied. In other words, each equiva-lent norm of · is also a strongly equivalent metric, and each strongly equivalent metric is a topologically equivalent metric. Generally,Tmaybe is not contractive inRnwith any
equivalent norm even if system () is of exponential stability. Besides, system () is possibly not of exponential stability inRneven ifTis contractive with certain topologically
equiv-alent metric (Wang and Xu []). In this paper, we show that strongly equivequiv-alent metrics are a class of appropriate equivalent metric functions describing the exponential stability of system ().
SupposeF:E→Eis a Lipschitz continuous nonlinear operator in the arbitrary subset
E⊂Rn. Then the lub Lipschitz constants ofFwith · ∈andd(·,·)∈are defined as
follows, respectively (Wang and Xu []; Soderlind []):
L (F,E) = sup
x,y∈E,x=y
Fx–Fy
x–y , Ld(F,E) =x,ysup∈E,x=y
d(Fx,Fy)
d(x,y) , ()
whereL (F,E) andLd(F,E) are two functions determined byF,Eand·ord(·,·). Hence,
for anyx,y∈E, one obtains
Fx–Fy ≤L (F,E)· x–y, d(Fx,Fy)≤Ld(F,E)·d(x,y).
Wang and Xu [] give the result thatlimk→∞L (Fk,E)/k andlimk→∞Ld(Fk,E)/k exist
and the following formulas hold:
lim
k→∞Ld
Fk,E/k= lim
k→∞L
Fk,E/k=inf
k L
Fk,E/k.
DenoteLip(F,E) =limk→∞L (Fk,E)/k. ThenLip(T,E) is a constant independent of
dif-ferent equivalent norms or strongly equivalent metrics. L (F,E) andLip(T,E) can be regarded as nonlinear generalizations of the matrix norm and matrix spectral radius. By Wang and Xu [], one can have
Lip(F,E) = inf
d(·,·)∈Ld(F,E). ()
Namely,Lip(T,E) is a minimum Lipschitz constant. Furthermore,F is contractive in
Ewith respect to a certain strongly equivalent metric inif and only ifLip(F,E) < or
L (Tm,E) < holds for a positive integerm.
Lemma In system(),L (T,Rn) <∞holds.And for any x∈Rnand a positive integer j,
Hence, the nonlinear operatorTin system () is Lipschitz continuous inRn. The main
results of this paper are presented below.
Theorem In system(),the following five conditions are equivalent:
(A) x*is globally exponentially stable inRn.
(B) x*is globally asymptotically stable inRnandρ(T(x∗)) < .
(C) Lip(T,Rn) < .
(D) Tis contractive inRnwith certain strongly equivalent metrics of .
(E) The power ofT is contractive inRnwith the norm ,i.e.,there exist a positive
integermand a constant <β< such thatTmx–Tmy ≤β· x–yholds for
anyx,y∈Rn.
As long as system () is of global exponential stability, we haveLip(T,Rn) <α, and for
any sufficiently smallε∈(, –Lip(T,Rn)),Lip(T,Rn) +εis an exponential bound. Here,
α=max{λ,ρ(T(x∗))}andρ(T(x∗)) is the spectral radius of the Jacobian matrixT(x∗). Theorem shows that we can distinguish global exponential stability from global asymp-totic one for system () by calculating the spectral radius of the Jacobian matrix at the equilibrium pointx∗, namely,ρ(T(x∗)). It tells us that the global exponential stability of system () is equivalent to the contractive property of the nonlinear operatorTwith cer-tain strongly equivalent metrics of the norm · . It actually describes a new converse to the Banach contraction theorem differing from the ones in Meyers [], Leader [], Opoitsev [].
Theorem In system(),assumelimx→∞supT(x) ≤ρ(T(x∗)).If x∗is globally
ex-ponentially stable in Rn,thenLip(T,Rn) =ρ(T(x∗))andρ(T(x∗))is the infimum of all
exponential bounds of convergent trajectories.Particularly,
xk–x∗≤
C(ε)
C(ε) ·
ρTx∗+εk·x–x∗
holds for anyε> and x∈Rn,where C(ε)>C(ε)> are the same constants as in
The-orem.
Theorem shows that exponential bounds of convergent trajectories describing the global property of trajectory motion in the whole space actually can be determined by the local information at the equilibrium point, namelyρ(T(x∗)).
3 Proofs
In this section, the proofs of results and theorems will be given.
Proof of Lemma Sincelimx→∞supT(x)=λ, for anyε> , there isb> such that
T(x) ≤λ+εasx–x∗ ≥b. LetF(b) ={x∈Rn:x–x∗ ≤b}. SinceT is continuously
differentiable inRn,T(x)is a continuous function in the compact set F(b). Thus, we
have supz∈F(b)T(z)<∞. This implies that M=supz∈RnT(z)<∞holds. From the mid-value theorem, for anyx,y∈Rn, one obtains
Tx–Ty ≤sup
z∈Rn
This implies thatL (T,Rn)≤M<∞holds. SinceTjis continuously differentiable, with
Proof of Theorem The equivalent relationships between (C), (D) and (E) can be easily gotten from Wang and Xu []. And it is also easy to deduce (B) from (A). Next, we mainly prove (C)⇒(A) and (B)⇒(C).
Thus, system () is of global exponential stability in Rn with the exponential bound
Lip(T,Rn) +ε.
Secondly, prove (B)⇒(C); namely, if system () is of global exponential stability inRn
is a continuous function ofx∈Rn. It implies that there exists a spherical neighborhood
U(r) ={x∈Rn:x–x∗ε≤r}such that for anyx∈U(r),
T(x)ε≤Tx∗ε+ε/≤ρTx∗+ε.
By the mid-value theorem, for anyx,y∈U(r), we have
Tx–Tyε≤ sup
z∈U(r)
T(z)ε· x–yε≤ρTx∗+ε· x–yε. ()
If system () is of global exponential stability inRn, it is globally uniformly asymptotically
stable inRnas well (Elaydi []). Therefore, there exists a positive integerNsuch that for any positive integerk≥Nand anyx∈B(b),Tkx∈U(r) holds. With equation (), for any
x,y∈B(b), ifk>N, we have
Tkx–Tkyε≤ρTx∗+ε·Tk–x–Tk–yε≤ · · · ≤ρTx∗+εk–N·TNx–TNyε ≤ρTx∗+εk–N·L ε
T,RnN· x–yε. It implies that for any positive integerk>N, one obtains
L ε
Tk,B(b)≤ρTx∗+εk–N·L ε
T,RnN.
SinceL ε(T,Rn) <∞, then
LipT,B(b)= lim
k→∞L ε
Tk,B(b)/k
≤ lim
k→∞
ρTx∗+ε(k–N)/k· lim
k→∞L ε
T,RnN/k ≤ρTx∗+ε.
Lip(T,B(b))≤ρ(T(x∗)) holds forεis an arbitrary positive number. Thus, there exists a positive integerNsuch thatL (Tk,B(b))≤(ρ(T(x∗)) +ε)kfor the fixedε> as a positive integerk≥N. For any positive integerk≥N,Tkis continuously differentiable, and for anyx∈F(b)⊂B(b),xis an inner point ofB(b). By the definition of the Gateaux differential, for anyx∈F(b),k≥Nandh∈Rnwithh= , one can obtain
Tk(x)·h= lim
t→+
Tk(x+t·h) –Tkx
t =tlim→+
Tk(x+t·h) –Tkx
t·h ≤L Tk,B(b).
It implies that for anyx∈F(b) andk≥N,
Tk(x)= sup h=
Tk(x)·h≤L Tk,B(b)
holds. For any z∈ Rn, either z ∈F(b) or z ∈ E(b), the result that if z∈ F(b), then
(Tk)(z) ≤βholds for any positive integerk≥N
is shown above. Next, we will prove that a similar result exists for anyz∈E(b). For any givenz∈E(b) and any given positive integerk≥N, there are the following two different cases.
Case : Tiz∈E(b) for any positive integer i<k. From equation (), one may have
Proof of Theorem Since system () is of global exponential stability inRn, there are con-is globally exponentially stable inRn. And from equation (), for anyε> andk, we have
Tkx–x∗≤C(ε) is not less than the infimum of exponential bounds of convergent trajectories. Moreover, from Wanget al.[], Wang and Xu [] if system () is of global exponential stability in
Rn with an exponential boundα, thenα≥ρ(T(x∗)). Therefore,ρ(T(x∗)) is not larger
than the infimum of exponential bounds of convergent trajectories. Finally,ρ(T(x∗)) is the infimum of exponential bounds of convergent trajectories.
4 Examples
In this section, we present two examples to clarify the concepts introduced in this paper and apply the obtained results to several concrete nonlinear discrete systems.
Example Consider the following recurrent neural network model studied in Jin []:
xk+= –Axk+WF(Bxk) +u, x∈Rn, ()
wherex*∈Rnis an equilibrium point,A=diag{a
,a, . . . ,ann}is a diagonal state feedback
coefficient matrix,B=diag{b,b, . . . ,bnn}withbii> is the activation gain matrix; the
interconnection matrixWis the lower triangular given by
W=
In Jinet al.[], it has been shown that () will be of global asymptotical stability inRn
if|aii|+|wii|bii< for any ≤i≤n. In Wang and Xu [], () is proven to be of the global
stability in the whole space is more interesting than in a bounded region, we will focus on it in the following.
DenoteT(x) = –Ax+WF(B(x)) +u,x∈Rn. Then it is easy to see that the Jacobian matrix
ofTatx*is given byT(x*) = –A+WF(B(x*))Band its eigenvalues are given by
–aii+wii·fi
bii·x*i
·bii: ≤i≤n.
Thus, whenever|aii|+|wii|bii< , we haveρ(T(x*)) < andlimx→∞supT(x)< ; thus
system () is of global exponential stability.
Example Consider a general class of discrete-time dynamic neural networks with con-tinuous states described in (Jin []) as follows:
x(k+ ) = –Ax(k) +Wσψx(k)+s, ()
wherex= (x,x, . . . ,xn)Tis the neural state vector,W= (wij)n×nis the synaptic weight
ma-trix,s= (s,s, . . . ,sn)Tis the constant threshold vector,A=diag{a,a, . . . ,an}with|ai|<
is the feedback coefficient matrix,ψ=diag{μ,μ, . . . ,μn}is the matrix of activation gains
for controlling state decaying, andσ(ψx) = (σ(μx),σ(μx), . . . ,σ(μnxn))Tis the
vector-valued activation function with a gain matrixψ.
The nonlinear neural activation functionσ(·) may be chosen as a continuous and differ-entiable nonlinear sigmoid function satisfying the following conditions: ()σ(x)→ ± as
x→ ±∞; ()σ(x) is bounded with the upper bound and the lower bound –; ()σ(x) = at a unique pointx= ; ()σ(x) > andσ(x)→ asx→ ±∞; and ()σ(x) has a global maximal value one.
Jin [] only shows the global asymptotic stability of system (). The global exponential stability is discussed as follows.
Denote T(x) = –Ax +Wσ(ψx) + s, x ∈ Rn, then T(x) = –A +Wσ(ψx)ψ. From
T(x) ≤ A+Wσ(ψx)ψ and σ(x)→ as x → ±∞, it is easy to know that limx→∞supT(x)< as <|ai|< . Ifρ(T(x*)) < is obtained atx*, then system ()
is of global exponential stability.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
LW gave the key idea about the connection between global exponential stability and global asymptotic stability out and participating the revision and illustration. QZ participated the proof of Lemma 1 and part of Theorem 1. YF carried out the left work including the proof of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 gave the two examples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and helpful suggestions that greatly improved the note’s quality.
Received: 5 May 2012 Accepted: 18 December 2012 Published: 11 January 2013 References
1. Bastinec, J, Diblik, J, Khusainov, DY, Ryvolova, A: Exponential stability and estimation of solutions of linear differential systems of neutral type with constant coefficients. Bound. Value Probl.2010, Article ID 956121 (2010).
doi:10.1155/2010/956121
3. Ortega, JM: Stability of difference equations and convergence of iterative processes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.10, 268-282 (1973)
4. Mousa, MS, Miller, RK, Michel, AN: Stability analysis of hybrid composite dynamical systems: descriptions involving operators and difference equations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control31, 603-615 (1986)
5. Jiang, ZP, Wang, Y: A converse Lyapunov theorem for discrete-time systems with disturbances. Syst. Control Lett.45, 49-58 (2002)
6. Wang, LS, Xu, ZB, Zhao, QF: Quantitative characterizations of exponential convergent property of nonlinear discrete dynamical systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control52(11), 2129-2134 (2007)
7. Diblik, J, Khusainov, DY, Grytsay, IV, Smarda, Z: Stability of nonlinear autonomous quadratic discrete systems in the critical case. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc.2010, Article ID 539087 (2010). doi:10.1155/2010/539087
8. Berezansky, L, Diblik, J, Ruzickova, M, Suta, Z: Asymptotic convergence of the solutions of a discrete equation with two delays in the critical case. Abstr. Appl. Anal.2011, Article ID 709427 (2011). doi:10.1155/2011/709427 9. Wang, LS, Heng, PA, Leung, KS, Xu, ZB: Global exponential asymptotic stability in nonlinear discrete dynamical
systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl.258, 349-358 (2001)
10. Wang, LS, Xu, ZB: Sufficient and necessary conditions for global exponential stability of a class of general discrete-time recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Regul. Pap.53(6), 1373-1380 (2006)
11. Wang, LS, Xu, ZB: On characterizations of exponential stability of nonlinear discrete dynamical systems on bounded regions. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control52(10), 1871-1881 (2007)
12. Meyers, PR: A converse to Banach’s contraction theorem. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand.71(B), 73-76 (1967) 13. Leader, S: A topological characterization of Banach contractions. Pac. J. Math.69(2), 461-466 (1977) 14. Opoitsev, VI: A converse to the principle of contracting maps. Russ. Math. Surv.31(4), 175-204 (1976) 15. Soderlind, G: On nonlinear difference and differential equations. BIT Numer. Math.24, 667-680 (1984) 16. Elaydi, SN: An Introduction to Difference Equations. Springer, New York (1995)
17. Jin, L, Gupta, MM: Global asymptotic stability of discrete-time analog neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.7(6), 1024-1031 (1996)
doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2013-9