• No results found

Amygdalin trihydrate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Amygdalin trihydrate"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o860

Eriksson and Widmalm C

20H33NO14 doi:10.1107/S1600536805006227 Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o860–o862 Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

Amygdalin trihydrate

Lars Erikssona* and Go¨ran

Widmalmb

a

Division of Structural Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, andbDepartment of

Organic Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal synchrotron study

T= 110 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.002 A˚

Rfactor = 0.037

wRfactor = 0.097

Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.9

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved

Extensive hydrogen bonding is present in the crystal structure

of the title compound [systematic name: (R

)-1-cyano-1-(phenylmethyl)--d-glucopyranosyl-(1!6)--d

-glucopyran-oside], C20H27NO113H2O, involving all of the hydroxy groups.

The water molecules are also involved in the hydrogen bonding; in particular, one of them acts as a bridge between the endocyclic O atoms of the two sugar residues. The overall

conformation of the disaccharide is described by the exo

-anomeric conformations, ’00

H = 26 and ’0H = 38, together

with an antiperiplanar extended conformation of the

consti-tuent sugar residues, with 00= 155.

Comment

Amygdalin is a cyanogenic glycoside found in the kernels of, for example, apples, almonds and peaches (Jones, 1998). More than 2500 plant species have been identified as containing

cyanogenic compounds (Moller et al., 1999). The title

compound is a diglycosyl glycoside from which cytotoxic hydrogen cyanide can be released, leading to acute cyanide

poisoning. This (R)-1-cyano-1-(phenylmethyl)--d

-glucopyranosyl-(1!6)--d-glucopyranoside, (I), has been

studied in solution by NMR spectroscopy (Ribeiro, 1990) and recently also in the solid state as a function of temperature

(Widmalm et al., 2003). It was found that the phenyl ring

exhibited thermally activated dynamics about the para axis,

whereas the glucosyl residues remained static. We present here the crystal structure of amygdalin trihydrate, and analyze a number of important degrees of freedom with respect to its torsion angles and the possibility of forming a complex hydrogen-bonding network due to the presence of three ordered water molecules per amygdalin molecule.

The conformation of an oligosaccharide is described by the

torsion angles’and at the glycosidic linkage between the

(2)

constituent monosaccharides. The ’ and angles for the

present compound are defined by’0 0(O500—C100—O60—C60),

’0 (O50—C10—O7—C7), 00 (C100—O60—C60—C50) and 0

(C10—O7—C7—C1). Selected torsion angles are shown in

Table 1.

The additional major degree of freedom in a hexopyranosyl residue is the conformational preference of the hydroxy-methyl group. In amygdalin this is described by the torsion angles !00 (O500—C500—C600—O60 0) and !0(O50—C50—C60

O60), the latter being part of the (1!6) linkage. The two!

torsion angles both correspond to theggconformation (Fig. 1),

which is one of the two found to be significantly populated in

solution. The two’Htorsion angles are in the vicinity of the

exo-anomeric conformation (’H ’50), as indicated by the

torsion angles’00 H(H1

00—C100—O60—C60) and0 H(H1

0—C10

O7—C7) (Table 1). For the-(1!6) linkage the value of 00

leads to an extended antiperiplanar conformation, also found in solutions of similar compounds, on the basis of NMR

spectroscopic and computer simulation studies (Lycknert et

al., 2004).

The torsion angle at the glycosidic linkage to the aglycone,

0, results in spatial proximity of atoms H10 and H7 and, in

oligosaccharide terminology, a syn conformation. For the

aglyconic part, the torsion angle (C2—C1—C7—O7)

describes the orientation of the phenyl group. The latter is

planar within less than 0.01 (1) A˚ , with atom C7 deviating by

0.023 (2) A˚ from the least-squares plane defined by the phenyl

ring. The plane defined by atoms C1, C7 and C8 is inclined by

14.0 (2) to the phenyl ring plane. Atom N1 is displaced by

0.060 (4) A˚ from the C1/C7/C8 plane.

The Cremer & Pople (1975) parameters for the two sugar

rings areQ= 0.5915 (11) A˚ ,= 3.85 (11)and= 221.4 (15)

for the O500 ! C500 direction, and Q = 0.5607 (10) A˚ , =

12.68 (10) and’ = 345.5 (6) for the O50 ! C50 direction.

Both of the sugar residues have the anticipated chair confor-mation,i.e.4C1.

All hydroxy groups act as donors in intermolecular

hydrogen bonds. The O300hydroxy group is also involved in an

intramolecular hydrogen bond to O400. All hydroxy groups,

except O40, also act, at least once, as hydrogen-bond acceptors.

Furthermore, atoms O400 and O20 are dual hydrogen-bond

acceptors. The three water molecules (OW1, OW2 and OW3)

act as dual hydrogen-bond donors. In fact, OW1 provides

donor H atoms for three hydrogen bonds,viz.one simple and

one bifurcated. Two of the water molecules are single

accep-tors and one (OW1) is a dual hydrogen-bond acceptor.

Interestingly, OW1 mediates the intramolecular hydrogen

bonding between O50and O500. A view of the hydrogen-bond

pattern around the three water molecules is shown in Fig. 1. In addition, atom N1 is an acceptor in the hydrogen-bond

pattern. The sugar residues pack in the ab plane and the

phenyl rings are involved in–interactionsviaa T-shaped

edge-to-face arrangement (Meyer et al., 2003). The angle

between the least-squares planes of the phenyl rings at (x,y,z)

and (2x,1

2+y, 2z) is 77.02 (4)

. The distance between the

centers of gravity of these rings is 4.930 (1) A˚ , comparable to

that in the crystal structure of edge-to-face oriented benzene

(5.025 A˚ ). A diagram of the packing, viewed along theaaxis,

is shown in Fig. 2. C—H interactions are present (Table 2),

similar to the aromatic interaction described above. Although

weak, the C—H interactions play important

structure-stabilizing roles, in particular for carbohydrate–protein complexes.

Experimental

Amygdalin [or (R)-1-cyano-1-(phenylmethyl)--d

-glucopyranosyl-(1!6)--d-glucopyranoside] was obtained from C. A. F. Kahlbaum

GmbH, Berlin, Germany. The compound was crystallized by slow evaporation of a mixture of water, ethanol and acetonitrile (1:1:1) at ambient temperature, yielding needles which were mounted with epoxy glue on to glass fibres. The scattering power of the crystals was weak; thus it was decided to collect data with synchrotron radiation at beamline I711 at the Swedish synchrotron radiation facility MAXLAB, Lund, Sweden.

Crystal data

C20H33NO14

Mr= 511.47

Monoclinic,P21

a= 9.4794 (11) A˚

b= 7.9025 (9) A˚

c= 16.2016 (19) A˚

= 94.089 (3)

V= 1210.6 (2) A˚3

Z= 2

Dx= 1.403 Mg m

3

Synchrotron radiation

= 0.891 A˚

Cell parameters from 999 reflections

= 3.0–29.0

= 0.12 mm1

T= 110 (2) K Plate, colorless 0.200.100.02 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1K area-detector diffractometer

!scans at different’and 2

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)

Tmin= 0.98,Tmax= 1.00 20604 measured reflections

5454 independent reflections 5010 reflections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.031

max= 45.9

h=15!14

k=10!12

l=16!25

organic papers

Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o860–o862 Eriksson and Widmalm C

[image:2.610.44.294.70.255.2]

20H33NO14

o861

Figure 1

(3)

Refinement

Refinement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.037

wR(F2) = 0.097

S= 1.04 5454 reflections 343 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w= 1/[2

(Fo2) + (0.0714P)2] whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max< 0.001

max= 0.50 e A˚

3

min=0.55 e A˚

3

Extinction correction:SHELXL97

Extinction coefficient: 0.051 (3)

Table 1

Selected torsion angles ().

C2—C1—C7—O7 69.87 (16) C1—C7—O7—C10

145.08 (11) O7—C7—C8—N1 172 (3) C7—O7—C10—O50 83.22 (12)

O50—C50—C60—O60 74.07 (12)

C50

—C60

—O60

—C10 0

154.93 (10)

C60—O60—C10 0—O50 0 94.69 (11)

O50 0

—C50 0

—C60 0

—O60 0

61.27 (13) H10 0

—C10 0

—O60

—C60

25.7 H10—C10—O7—C7 37.8

[image:3.610.44.296.354.520.2]

C10—O7—C7—H7 28.1

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

Cgis the centroid of the phenyl ring.

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

O20—H2X O20 0i

0.84 1.88 2.701 (1) 166 O30

—H3X OW1 0.84 2.02 2.813 (2) 157 O40

—H4X O30ii

0.84 2.00 2.817 (1) 164 O20 0—H2Y O30 0iii

0.84 1.85 2.690 (1) 175 O30 0

—H3Y O40 0

0.84 2.40 2.835 (1) 113 O30 0

—H3Y O20iv

0.84 2.51 3.346 (1) 176 O40 0—H4Y O20iv

0.84 1.99 2.823 (1) 174 O60 0—H62C OW3v

0.84 1.96 2.774 (1) 162 OW1—H1W1 O50ii

0.82 (2) 2.14 (2) 2.958 (2) 173 (2) OW1—H2W1 O50 0ii

0.84 (2) 2.26 (2) 2.904 (1) 133 (2) OW1—H2W1 O60 0ii

0.84 (2) 2.36 (2) 3.126 (2) 151 (2) OW2—H1W2 OW1 0.81 (3) 2.07 (3) 2.864 (2) 165 (3) OW2—H2W2 O40 0iii

0.82 (2) 2.04 (2) 2.860 (2) 174 (2) OW3—H1W3 OW2 0.83 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.760 (2) 164 (2) OW3—H2W3 N1vi

0.83 (2) 2.28 (2) 3.094 (2) 167 (2) C5—H5 Cgvii

0.95 2.71 3.590 (2) 155 C50 0

—H50 0 Cgviii

1.00 2.83 3.640 (2) 138

Symmetry codes: (i)xþ1;y;z; (ii)xþ1;yþ1

2;zþ1; (iii)x;yþ 1

2;zþ1; (iv)

x1;y1;z; (v) xþ1;y1

2;zþ1; (vi) x;y;z1; (vii)x3;y 1 2;zþ2;

(viii)x1;y;z.

H atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent atoms, with CH, CH2and aromatic C—H bonds set equal

to 1.00, 0.99 and 0.95 A˚ , respectively, andUiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and

1.5Ueq(O). A ‘rigid-bond’ restraint was applied toU

ij

values (Rollett, 1970). The Flack (1983) parameter was inconclusive, but the absolute configuration was set by thea prioriknowledge that the sample is a known natural product. In the absence of significant anomalous scattering effects, the 5001 Friedel pairs were merged.

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1998); cell refinement:

SMART; data reduction:SAINT(Siemens, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure:SHELXL97(Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

DIAMOND(Bergerhoff, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication:PLATON(Spek, 2003).

This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council (VR).

References

Bergerhoff, G. (1996).DIAMOND. Gerhard-Domagk-Straße 1, 53121 Bonn, Germany.

Cremer, D. & Pople, J. A. (1975).J. Am. Chem. Soc.97, 1354–1358. Flack, H. D. (1983).Acta Cryst.A39, 876–881.

Jones, D. A. (1998).Phytochemistry,47, 155–162.

Lycknert, K., Edblad, M., Imberty, A. & Widmalm, G. (2004).Biochemistry,

43, 9647–9654.

Meyer, E. A., Catellano, R. K. & Diederich, F. (2003).Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 1210–1250.

Moller, B. L. & Siegler, D. S. (1999).Plant Amino Acids: Biochemistry and Biotechnology, edited by B. K. Singh, pp. 563–609. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

Ribeiro, A. A. (1990).Magn. Reson. Chem.28, 765–773.

Rollett, J. S. (1970).Crystallographic Computing, edited by F. R. Ahmed, S. R. Hall & C. P. Huber, pp. 167–181. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2002).SADABS. Version 2.03. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Siemens (1998).SMARTandSAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Spek, A. L. (2003).J. Appl. Cryst.36, 7–13.

Widmalm, G., Jansson, K., Pellijeff, G. & Sanstro¨m, D. (2003).J. Phys. Chem. B,107, 11794–11798.

organic papers

o862

Eriksson and Widmalm C

20H33NO14 Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o860–o862

Figure 2

(4)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805006227]

Amygdalin trihydrate

Lars Eriksson and G

ö

ran Widmalm

(R)-1-cyano-1-(phenylmethyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→ 6)-β-D– glucopyranoside

Crystal data

C20H33NO14 Mr = 511.47 Monoclinic, P21

Hall symbol: P 2yb

a = 9.4794 (11) Å

b = 7.9025 (9) Å

c = 16.2016 (19) Å

β = 94.089 (3)°

V = 1210.6 (2) Å3

Z = 2

F(000) = 544

Dx = 1.403 Mg m−3

Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.891 Å Cell parameters from 999 reflections

θ = 3.0–29.0°

µ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 110 K Plate, colorless 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1K area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: Beamline I711, Maxlab, Lund, Sweden

Silicon monochromator

Detector resolution: 10 pixels mm-1 ω scan at different φ and 2θ

Absorption correction: part of the refinement model (ΔF)

(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)

Tmin = 0.98, Tmax = 1.00 20604 measured reflections 5454 independent reflections 5010 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.031

θmax = 45.9°, θmin = 1.6°

h = −15→14

k = −10→12

l = −16→25

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 wR(F2) = 0.097 S = 1.04 5454 reflections 343 parameters 10 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0714P)2]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001

Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3

Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4

(5)

supporting information

sup-2 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862

Special details

Experimental. Absolute structure known as it is a natural product.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

(6)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862

H6XA 0.2501 0.4326 0.7292 0.009* H6XB 0.1949 0.5305 0.6462 0.009* O6′ 0.22795 (8) 0.28318 (12) 0.62937 (6) 0.00766 (16) C1′′ 0.12150 (10) 0.18916 (15) 0.66312 (7) 0.00554 (18) H1′′ 0.0560 0.2653 0.6915 0.007* C2′′ 0.04170 (10) 0.09484 (14) 0.59197 (7) 0.00477 (18) H2′′ 0.1105 0.0305 0.5600 0.006* O2′′ −0.03409 (8) 0.21247 (12) 0.53828 (6) 0.00786 (16) H2Y 0.0218 0.2577 0.5069 0.012* C3′′ −0.06282 (10) −0.02798 (14) 0.62669 (7) 0.00450 (18) H3′′ −0.1337 0.0371 0.6567 0.005* O3′′ −0.13500 (8) −0.12627 (12) 0.56258 (6) 0.00721 (15) H3Y −0.1399 −0.2274 0.5781 0.011* C4′′ 0.01806 (11) −0.14764 (14) 0.68725 (7) 0.00527 (18) H4′′ 0.0898 −0.2115 0.6573 0.006* O4′′ −0.07501 (9) −0.26505 (12) 0.72259 (6) 0.00915 (16) H4Y −0.0967 −0.3420 0.6882 0.014* C5′′ 0.09444 (11) −0.04260 (15) 0.75680 (7) 0.00632 (19) H5′′ 0.0229 0.0230 0.7861 0.008* O5′′ 0.18930 (8) 0.07326 (12) 0.72073 (6) 0.00724 (16) C6′′ 0.18368 (12) −0.14633 (17) 0.81940 (8) 0.0103 (2) H6YA 0.2304 −0.0707 0.8617 0.012* H6YB 0.1227 −0.2262 0.8476 0.012* O6′′ 0.28803 (11) −0.23813 (15) 0.77847 (7) 0.0182 (2) H62C 0.3464 −0.2812 0.8139 0.027* OW1 0.51979 (10) 0.50771 (13) 0.31483 (7) 0.01277 (18) H1W1 0.510 (2) 0.610 (2) 0.3052 (14) 0.019* H2W1 0.587 (2) 0.476 (3) 0.2876 (13) 0.019* OW2 0.30569 (13) 0.3800 (2) 0.19742 (9) 0.0294 (3) H1W2 0.357 (3) 0.432 (4) 0.2304 (15) 0.044* H2W2 0.238 (2) 0.346 (4) 0.2215 (16) 0.044* OW3 0.48522 (12) 0.18508 (19) 0.11009 (8) 0.0241 (3) H1W3 0.429 (2) 0.254 (4) 0.1276 (15) 0.036* H2W3 0.487 (3) 0.205 (4) 0.0598 (12) 0.036*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(7)

supporting information

sup-4 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862

C1′ 0.0043 (4) 0.0072 (5) 0.0077 (5) 0.0003 (3) −0.0026 (3) −0.0010 (4) C2′ 0.0033 (3) 0.0060 (5) 0.0082 (5) 0.0002 (3) −0.0015 (3) −0.0010 (4) O2′ 0.0021 (3) 0.0119 (4) 0.0170 (5) −0.0011 (3) −0.0007 (3) −0.0040 (4) C3′ 0.0038 (3) 0.0051 (4) 0.0067 (5) −0.0004 (3) −0.0006 (3) 0.0007 (4) O3′ 0.0083 (3) 0.0122 (4) 0.0056 (4) 0.0023 (3) 0.0009 (3) 0.0006 (3) C4′ 0.0036 (3) 0.0047 (4) 0.0067 (5) −0.0002 (3) −0.0013 (3) 0.0005 (4) O4′ 0.0065 (3) 0.0074 (4) 0.0110 (4) 0.0012 (3) −0.0045 (3) 0.0023 (3) C5′ 0.0039 (3) 0.0043 (4) 0.0085 (5) −0.0005 (3) −0.0002 (3) −0.0010 (4) O5′ 0.0054 (3) 0.0078 (4) 0.0081 (4) −0.0004 (3) −0.0019 (3) 0.0012 (3) C6′ 0.0048 (4) 0.0054 (5) 0.0134 (6) −0.0018 (3) 0.0024 (4) −0.0032 (4) O6′ 0.0070 (3) 0.0059 (4) 0.0104 (4) −0.0044 (3) 0.0035 (3) −0.0029 (3) C1′′ 0.0039 (3) 0.0053 (4) 0.0075 (5) −0.0012 (3) 0.0004 (3) 0.0000 (4) C2′′ 0.0031 (3) 0.0049 (4) 0.0061 (5) −0.0003 (3) −0.0009 (3) 0.0002 (3) O2′′ 0.0050 (3) 0.0083 (4) 0.0102 (4) 0.0007 (3) −0.0001 (3) 0.0048 (3) C3′′ 0.0024 (3) 0.0053 (4) 0.0056 (5) −0.0007 (3) −0.0014 (3) −0.0007 (4) O3′′ 0.0066 (3) 0.0060 (4) 0.0085 (4) −0.0015 (3) −0.0032 (3) −0.0015 (3) C4′′ 0.0044 (3) 0.0047 (4) 0.0065 (5) −0.0007 (3) −0.0009 (3) 0.0005 (4) O4′′ 0.0102 (3) 0.0074 (4) 0.0097 (4) −0.0045 (3) −0.0005 (3) 0.0020 (3) C5′′ 0.0058 (4) 0.0067 (4) 0.0064 (5) −0.0011 (3) −0.0002 (3) 0.0002 (4) O5′′ 0.0042 (3) 0.0079 (4) 0.0092 (4) −0.0020 (3) −0.0026 (3) 0.0018 (3) C6′′ 0.0111 (4) 0.0112 (5) 0.0080 (5) 0.0019 (4) −0.0028 (4) 0.0001 (4) O6′′ 0.0180 (4) 0.0221 (6) 0.0132 (5) 0.0130 (4) −0.0069 (3) −0.0056 (4) OW1 0.0103 (4) 0.0129 (4) 0.0153 (5) 0.0006 (3) 0.0025 (3) 0.0023 (4) OW2 0.0191 (5) 0.0419 (8) 0.0276 (7) −0.0114 (5) 0.0035 (4) −0.0059 (6) OW3 0.0215 (5) 0.0312 (7) 0.0191 (6) −0.0058 (5) −0.0030 (4) −0.0008 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

(8)

supporting information

sup-5 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862

C2′—O2′ 1.4235 (13) C5′′—O5′′ 1.4364 (14) C2′—C3′ 1.5304 (15) C5′′—C6′′ 1.5145 (17) C2′—H2′ 1.0000 C5′′—H5′′ 1.0000 O2′—H2X 0.8400 C6′′—O6′′ 1.4276 (16) C3′—O3′ 1.4330 (15) C6′′—H6YA 0.9900 C3′—C4′ 1.5300 (14) C6′′—H6YB 0.9900 C3′—H3′ 1.0000 O6′′—H62C 0.8400 O3′—H3X 0.8400 OW1—H1W1 0.824 (18) C4′—O4′ 1.4315 (14) OW1—H2W1 0.843 (17) C4′—C5′ 1.5311 (17) OW2—H1W2 0.811 (19) C4′—H4′ 1.0000 OW2—H2W2 0.821 (19) O4′—H4X 0.8400 OW3—H1W3 0.832 (19) C5′—O5′ 1.4428 (14) OW3—H2W3 0.832 (19) C5′—C6′ 1.5196 (15)

(9)

supporting information

sup-6 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862

O2′—C2′—C3′ 110.41 (9) C3′′—C4′′—C5′′ 108.94 (9) C1′—C2′—C3′ 112.17 (9) O4′′—C4′′—H4′′ 109.1 O2′—C2′—H2′ 108.6 C3′′—C4′′—H4′′ 109.1 C1′—C2′—H2′ 108.6 C5′′—C4′′—H4′′ 109.1 C3′—C2′—H2′ 108.6 C4′′—O4′′—H4Y 109.5 C2′—O2′—H2X 109.5 O5′′—C5′′—C6′′ 106.35 (9) O3′—C3′—C4′ 110.48 (9) O5′′—C5′′—C4′′ 108.75 (9) O3′—C3′—C2′ 106.00 (9) C6′′—C5′′—C4′′ 114.18 (10) C4′—C3′—C2′ 112.15 (9) O5′′—C5′′—H5′′ 109.1 O3′—C3′—H3′ 109.4 C6′′—C5′′—H5′′ 109.1 C4′—C3′—H3′ 109.4 C4′′—C5′′—H5′′ 109.1 C2′—C3′—H3′ 109.4 C1′′—O5′′—C5′′ 114.16 (8) C3′—O3′—H3X 109.5 O6′′—C6′′—C5′′ 109.66 (10) O4′—C4′—C3′ 110.94 (9) O6′′—C6′′—H6YA 109.7 O4′—C4′—C5′ 111.37 (9) C5′′—C6′′—H6YA 109.7 C3′—C4′—C5′ 112.06 (9) O6′′—C6′′—H6YB 109.7 O4′—C4′—H4′ 107.4 C5′′—C6′′—H6YB 109.7 C3′—C4′—H4′ 107.4 H6YA—C6′′—H6YB 108.2 C5′—C4′—H4′ 107.4 C6′′—O6′′—H62C 109.5 C4′—O4′—H4X 109.5 H1W1—OW1—H2W1 105.6 (19) O5′—C5′—C6′ 107.00 (10) H1W2—OW2—H2W2 108 (2) O5′—C5′—C4′ 108.12 (9) H1W3—OW3—H2W3 106 (2) C6′—C5′—C4′ 112.37 (9)

(10)

supporting information

sup-7 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o860–o862

O2′—C2′—C3′—C4′ −164.35 (9) C3′′—C4′′—C5′′—C6′′ −177.68 (9) C1′—C2′—C3′—C4′ −43.34 (13) O6′—C1′′—O5′′—C5′′ −175.61 (9) O3′—C3′—C4′—O4′ −70.91 (12) C2′′—C1′′—O5′′—C5′′ −58.88 (12) C2′—C3′—C4′—O4′ 171.08 (9) C6′′—C5′′—O5′′—C1′′ −176.51 (9) O3′—C3′—C4′—C5′ 163.92 (9) C4′′—C5′′—O5′′—C1′′ 60.09 (12) C2′—C3′—C4′—C5′ 45.90 (13) O5′′—C5′′—C6′′—O6′′ −61.27 (13) O4′—C4′—C5′—O5′ 178.90 (8) C4′′—C5′′—C6′′—O6′′ 58.66 (13) C3′—C4′—C5′—O5′ −56.16 (12) H1′′—C1′′—O6′—C6′ 25.7 O4′—C4′—C5′—C6′ 61.05 (12) H1′—C1′—O7—C7 37.8 C3′—C4′—C5′—C6′ −174.02 (10) C1′—O7—C7—H7 −28.1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

O2′—H2X···O2′′i 0.84 1.88 2.701 (1) 166

O3′—H3X···OW1 0.84 2.02 2.813 (2) 157 O4′—H4X···O3′ii 0.84 2.00 2.817 (1) 164

O2′′—H2Y···O3′′iii 0.84 1.85 2.690 (1) 175

O3′′—H3Y···O4′′ 0.84 2.40 2.835 (1) 113 O3′′—H3Y···O2′iv 0.84 2.51 3.346 (1) 176

O4′′—H4Y···O2′iv 0.84 1.99 2.823 (1) 174

O6′′—H62C···OW3v 0.84 1.96 2.774 (1) 162

OW1—H1W1···O5′ii 0.82 (2) 2.14 (2) 2.958 (2) 173 (2)

OW1—H2W1···O5′′ii 0.84 (2) 2.26 (2) 2.904 (1) 133 (2)

OW1—H2W1···O6′′ii 0.84 (2) 2.36 (2) 3.126 (2) 151 (2)

OW2—H1W2···OW1 0.81 (3) 2.07 (3) 2.864 (2) 165 (3) OW2—H2W2···O4′′iii 0.82 (2) 2.04 (2) 2.860 (2) 174 (2)

OW3—H1W3···OW2 0.83 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.760 (2) 164 (2) OW3—H2W3···N1vi 0.83 (2) 2.28 (2) 3.094 (2) 167 (2)

C5—H5···Cgvii 0.95 2.71 3.590 (2) 155

C5′′—H5′′···Cgviii 1.00 2.83 3.640 (2) 138

Figure

Figure 1
Table 2Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ , �).

References

Related documents

Outputs on the ‘Move Description’ subset of data from our final model were judged by hu- mans to be as good as human written ground truth commentaries on measures of fluency

1. 2002 yılında sürükleyici endüstrilerden biri olan “k imyasal madde ve ürünlerin imal atı” endüstrisi, orta -yüksek teknoloji ler kapsamında olup, her iki dönemin

The objective of this research is to empirically examine if both credit and business cycle affect the ex-post credit risk (i.e. non-performing loans) in the banking system of

We show that a layer-wise pretraining scheme for recur- rent attention models gives over 1% BLEU improvement absolute and it allows to train deeper recurrent encoder

In this paper, we tackle the task of economic event detection by means of a supervised machine learning approach, which we expect will be able to detect a wider variety

Chinese grammatical error diagnosis task has been developed for a long time. From the initial statisti- cal methods to the current machine learning, more and more attention has

In this study, we presented a novel encoder-decoder model to automatically generate market comments from numerical time-series data of stock prices, using the Nikkei Stock Average as

However, unlike them, we do not employ any Gold Standard (annotated by experts) for training the annotators and instead we propose a self-training strategy to select a set