• No results found

The maximum is not the optimum

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The maximum is not the optimum"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Upper Midwest Specialty Crops:

What does a viable future look like?

Jed Colquhoun and Paul Mitchell

University of Wisconsin-Madison

The maximum is not the optimum

-Garrett Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons

(2)

• Current value of specialty crops, processing and related infrastructure

• Recent trends in specialty crop production, using US and Wisconsin examples

• Introducing a Specialty Crop Task Force

• WE NEED TO HEAR FROM YOU!

The future of specialty crops

Specialty crops are part of our rural glue

2013-2015 Average

Industry

Total Revenue

($ million) Total Economic Activity

($ million) Total Jobs

Specialty Crop Production $695 $1,059 7,567

Potatoes $271 $413 2,922

Vegetables $228 $348 2,497

Cranberries $158 $241 1,735

Other Fruit $38 $58 413

Specialty Crop Processing $2,822 $4,781 16,981

Total Impacts $3,517 $5,835 24,538

A $5.8 billion dollar industry generating almost 25,000 jobs

from 700 million dollars of raw fruit and vegetable products

(3)

Economic Impact of Specialty Crop Industry in

Wisconsin 2006-2008 versus 2013-2015

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

Production Processing Total

Economic Activity ($Million)

2006-2008 2013-2015

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000

Production Processing Total

Number of Jobs

2006-2008 2013-2015

-3%

-9% -8%

-24%

-32%

-29%

Prices continue to decline for almost all

commodities, while production costs increase

Prices received August 2017 August 2018

Dry beans $29.50/cwt $26.30/cwt

Carrots, fresh $28.90/cwt $25.80/cwt

Sweet corn, fresh $26.80/cwt $24.40/cwt

Cucumbers, fresh $16.00/cwt $17.80/cwt

Onions, fresh $13.60/cwt $15.20/cwt

Potatoes, fresh $14.61/cwt $11.20/cwt

Apples $0.426/lb $0.297/lb

Strawberries $84.70/cwt $50.50/cwt

Corn $3.27/bu $3.36/bu

Soybean $9.24/bu $8.59/bu

Milk, all $18.10/cwt $15.90/cwt

Prices paid Index for commodities and services, interest, taxes and farm wage rates

Index 105.7 108.7

(4)

Cranberry acres increased, prices dropped and in

2018 about 10% of the crop gets “dumped”

Harvested Acres Farm Price $/barrel

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

WI US

10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 WI All Other

WI farm price: Down 39% since 2012

(5)

Processing Vegetables in Wisconsin

(Sweet Corn, Snap Beans, Green Peas, Carrots, Cucumbers)

Year Planted

Acres Value

($ million) Value ($/Ac) 2011 194,300 $174 $894 2012 198,700 $193 $970 2013 184,300 $251 $1,361 2014 183,000 $156 $853 2015 179,400 $156 $869 2016 172,200 $126 $734 2017 157,300 $119 $754

Planted Acres down 21% since peak in 2012

Crop Value down 53% since peak in 2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Crop Acres (1,000’s) Crop Value ($ Million) Planted Acres Cro p Value

US per capita vegetable consumption has been

declining since 1996 (total quantity)

– Decrease in last 10 years:

All 5%, Fresh 3%, Canned 8%, Frozen 10%

0 50 100 150 200

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Pounds

Fresh Canned Frozen

(6)

Canned snap bean consumption per capita

and price have declined significantly

2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Pounds

US canned snap bean per capita consumption

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550

1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

$/cwt

US snap bean season average farm price (2009 dollars)

Data source: USDA-ERS

Meanwhile, yield per acre increases, more

than making up for acreage decline

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Yield (ton/A)

Wisconsin snap bean yield

50, 000 55, 000 60, 000 65, 000 70, 000 75, 000 80, 000 85, 000 90, 000

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Planted acres

Wisconsin snap bean acres

Data source: USDA-NASS

(7)

WI Potatoes: an example of successful volume management?

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Harvested Acres

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Yield (cwt/A)

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Production (million cwt)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Price ($/cwt)

Data source: USDA-NASS

Consumers aren’t the only variability that

presents risk and opportunities

(8)

Well, that’s depressing… what can we do

about it?

• Specialty Crop Task Force:

Small group and individual meetings: growers, food processors, public agencies, commodity leadership, food innovators, retailers.

Learn about related successes, here and elsewhere:

specialty meats, specialty cheeses, fermentation products (foods as well as breweries/distilleries), multi- ingredient convenience products.

Not to replicate what’s worked elsewhere, but to learn how they went about finding success

Compile and analyze information, propose a suite of potential options, share and seek feedback at a Specialty Crop Summit.

(9)

Does the data we shared reflect reality?

A. Yes, unfortunately it’s accurate

B. It’s about 75% accurate but could use a few tweaks C. It’s about 25% accurate but off base in quite a few areas D. No, it’s doesn’t reflect reality at all

How concerned are you about these trends?

A. They’re consistently downward and we need to do something different now

B. We need some moderate tweaks but not wholesale change C. It’s a cycle we’ve seen before, and we’ll recover if we stay the

course

(10)

What should be our highest priority for

change?

A. What we grow – we need to change our cropping portfolio B. How we grow our crops (ie. local, organic, sustainable, etc.)

C. How we process/package the crops we currently grow (ie. frozen, fresh, dehydrated, pouch packs, etc.)

D. How we market what we currently grow and process

Is there room in a pre-competitive space for

new crop/product/market development?

A. Yes, we should think about this as a regional agricultural solution (ie. Napa wines, Vidalia onions)

B. No, let the individual companies figure it out and we’ll grow what they need

(11)

What is our region’s greatest value

proposition relative to competitors?

A. Climate

B. Water availability, both for agronomy and processing C. Pests, or lack thereof

D. Transportation and nearby consumers E. Processing and storage infrastructure F. Expertise

Discussion points: products

Are there other products we could create with our existing crop portfolio that would be attractive to consumers?

What should we look at growing to diversify our crop portfolio?

How can agriculture become as nimble as consumers?

(12)

Discussion points: process

What is an appropriate role in determining our future for the University and public sector?

Who should be involved in helping us decide what to grow and process?

Select photos courtesy Sevie Kenyon, UW-Madison

References

Related documents

2.7 Cancellation/Termination: If the Contractor defaults in its agreement to provide personnel or equipment to the University's satisfaction, or in any other way fails to

In the present study, we addressed that Sp infection specifically induces autophagy through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR autophagy pathway and ROS hypergeneration in a human pulmonary epi-

Similarly these normalized rank-1 CP matrices together with the normalized extremely bad matrices constitute the extreme points of ( 23 ).. We prove

Even so, mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops and support available, time available, and civil considerations conditions often dictate that Soldiers carry all the

Private Health Plus offers additional access to specialist consultations and cover for diagnostic imaging and testing outside of surgical procedures or hospitalisation?. It

> Cover for surgery and hospitalisation up to $300,000 per year. > Major diagnostic imaging and tests are covered whether or not related to a surgery or hospitalisation up

Options christopher is, as pushkin transcript sterling memorial, none from people were just a magical place, get the common room and to hear?. Walked in with bradshaw but as

For more information about the flow control fields, and the valid and default values for them, see "JMS Connection Factory: Configuration: Flow Control" in the Oracle