• No results found

Lisa Borland. A multi-timescale statistical feedback model of volatility: Stylized facts and implications for option pricing

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Lisa Borland. A multi-timescale statistical feedback model of volatility: Stylized facts and implications for option pricing"

Copied!
83
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Evnine-Vaughan Associates, Inc.

A multi-timescale statistical feedback model of volatility:

Stylized facts

and

implications for option pricing

Lisa Borland

October, 2005

(2)

Acknowledgements: Jeremy Evnine

Roberto Osorio Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

(3)

Layout

• Stylized facts of markets

- Why we need a new model • The non-Gaussian model

-Properties

-Applications: Options and Credit • The multi-time scale model

-Capturing the stylized facts • Work in progress and conclusions

(4)
(5)

Properties of Financial Time-Series

• Power Law distributions, persistent over

very many timescales: minutes to weeks

Cumulative distribution power law tail -3

(6)

Properties of Financial Time-Series

• Power Law distributions, persistent

• Slow decay to Gaussian, as

• Volatility clustering and correlation

• Volatility relaxation (Omori law)

• Close-to log-normal distribution of volatility

• Returns normally diffusive over time-scales

• Leverage effect (Skew: Negative returns Æ higher volatility)

• Time-Reversal asymmetry

25 . 0 −

τ

(7)

o Empirical --- Gaussian

(8)
(9)

Consequences

• Risk control

:

under-estimate rare events

• Derivative markets

:

(options, credit)

wrong model of underlying leads to wrong

pricing, wrong hedging

(10)

Challenge

• A model that can reproduce the stylized facts

• A model that can reproduce option prices, credit etc.

• A model that captures the correct dynamical features

Desirable

• Intuition

• Parsimony

(11)

• Stochastic volatility

(Heston 1993)

• Levy noise

• GARCH

• Multifractal models

(Bacry,Delour,Muzy, 2001)

Popular models

Problems

• Typically converge too quickly to Gaussian

• Less parsimonious

(12)
(13)

The Standard Stock Price Model

S

Y ln

=

) ' ( ) ' ( 0 t t t (t)d d − >= < = > < δ ω ω ty volatili : return of rate

σ

µ

:

ω

σ

µ

dt

d

dY

=

+

(14)

The Standard Stock Price Model

) ' ( ) ' ( 0 t t t (t) ω − >= < = > < δ ω ω ty volatili : return of rate

σ

µ

: Gaussian Distribution Fokker-Planck Equation 2 2

2

1

ω

d

P

d

dt

dP =

)

2

exp(

2

1

)

(

2

t

t

P

ω

π

ω

=

ω

σ

µ

dt

d

dY

=

+

S

Y ln

=

(15)

+

=

dt

d

dY

µ

σ

The Generalized Returns Model

Borland L, Phys. Rev.Lett 89 (2002) Borland L, Quantitative Finance 2 (2002)

(16)

ω

d

P

d

q 2 1

)

(

=

+

=

dt

d

dY

µ

σ

The Generalized Returns Model

The Generalized Returns Model

Borland L, Phys. Rev.Lett 89 (2002) Borland L, Quantitative Finance 2 (2002)

(17)

The Generalized Returns Model

The Generalized Returns Model

Borland L, Phys. Rev.Lett 89 (2002) Borland L, Quantitative Finance 2 (2002)

Tsallis Distribution Nonlinear Fokker-Planck 2 2 2

2

1

=

d

P

d

dt

dP

q q t q t Z P = − − Ω 1− 1 2) ) ( ) 1 ( 1 ( ) ( 1

β

ω

d

P

d

q 2 1

)

(

=

+

=

dt

d

dY

µ

σ

(18)

In other words:

State dependent deterministic model

t t t t t

a

q

b

d

d

2

ω

1 2

]

)

1

(

[

+

=

Work with

)

(S

=

(19)

Extensions to Model: i q i q i

P

d

dY

σ

2

ω

1

)]

(

[

=

0

=

Current Model: eg moving average More realistic model:

(20)

Extensions to Model: i q i q i

P

d

dY

σ

2

ω

1

)]

(

[

=

0

=

Current Model: eg moving average More realistic model:

Or: i i j q j i q i

P

d

dY

σ

ω

= −

=

1 0 2 1

)]

|

(

[

(21)
(22)

Not a perfect model of returns:

Well-defined starting price and time

Nevertheless:

Reproduces fat-tails and volatility clustering Closed form option-pricing formulae

(23)

Example European Call Q rT S T K e c = − max[ ( )− ,0] Stock Price

2

+

=

2

Tq t T

rT

P

dt

S

T

S

0 1

)

(

exp

)

0

(

)

(

σ

(24)

Example European Call Q rT S T K e c = − max[ ( )− ,0] Stock Price

2

+

=

2

Tq t T

rT

P

dt

S

T

S

0 1

)

(

exp

)

0

(

)

(

σ

Integrate using generalized Feynman-Kac 2

)

(

T

T

γ

(25)

Example European Call Q rT S T K e c = − max[ ( )− ,0] Stock Price

2

+

=

(

0

)

exp

2

(

)

(

1

)

(

)

2

)

(

T T

rT

T

q

g

T

S

T

S

σ

γ

2 1

d

d

T

}

)

(

{

S

T

>

K

Payoff if

Æ

(26)

Example European Call Q rT S T K e c = − max[ ( )− ,0]

Τ −

=

2 1

)

(

)

)

(

(

d d T q rT

S

T

K

P

d

e

c

σ σ , ,

)

0

(

M

q

e

rT

KN

q

S

=

(27)
(28)

K=50, T=0.4, sigma=0.3, r=.06

q=1.5

(29)

Volatility Smiles

o Empirical implied vols __ q=1.43 implied vols

(30)

72 76 80 84 Strike 9 10 11 12 13 14 Vo l

(31)

72 76 80 84 Strike 9 10 11 12 13 14 Vo l

(32)

72 76 80 84 Strike 9 10 11 12 13 14 Vo l

(33)

72 76 80 84 Strike 9 10 11 12 13 14 Vo l

(34)

72 76 80 84 Strike 9 10 11 12 13 14 Vo l

(35)

Example Currency Futures:

(500 options)

1. 0.16 1.4 0.008

q Mean square relative pricing error

Benefits of a more parsimonious model:

1) Better pricing - arbitrage opportunities 2) Better hedging

(36)

The Generalized Model with Skew

1 −

S

α

S

dS

+

=

Sdt

S

d

dS

µ

σ

α

ω

d

P

d

q 2 1

)

(

=

Volatility Leverage Correlation

(37)

0 1 2 3 4 Time [Years] -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Return [Hourl y ]

(38)

Example European Call Q rT S T K e c = − max[ ( )− ,0]

Τ −

=

2 1

)

(

)

)

(

(

d d T q rT

S

T

K

P

d

e

σ α σ α, , , ,

)

0

(

M

q

e

rT

KN

q

S

c

=

(39)

5

.

0

=

α

q=1.5

(40)

Strike BS Implied Volatility

(41)

Strike K Strike K T=.03 T=0.1 T=0.2 T=0.3 T=0.55 SP500 OX q=1.5, alpha = -1.

(42)
(43)
(44)

4OCT30A 4OCT35A 4OCT40A 4OCT45A 4OCT50A Series 0 5 10 15 cB id

Call Bid/Ask Theoretical value

(45)

4NOV35A 4NOV40A 4NOV45A 4NOV50A V12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 cB id

Call Bid/Ask Theoretical value

(46)

0 5 10 15 20 cB id

4DEC25A 4DEC30A 4DEC35A 4DEC40A 4DEC45A 4DEC50A 4DEC50A 4DEC50A V56

Call Bid/Ask Theoretical value

(47)

5JAN10A 5JAN15A 5JAN20A 5JAN25A 5JAN30A 5JAN35A 5JAN40A 5JAN45A 5JAN50A V23 0 10 20 30 cB id

Call Bid/Ask Theoretical value

(48)

5MAR30A 5MAR35A 5MAR40A 5MAR45A 5MAR50A V34 0 5 10 15 cB id

Call Bid/Ask Theoretical value

(49)

6JAN15A 6JAN20A 6JAN25A 6JAN30A 6JAN35A 6JAN40A 6JAN45A 6JAN50A V45 1 11 21 31 cBid

Call Bid/Ask Theoretical value

(50)

)

,

,

(

2

σ

α

q

V

S

dS

V

=

=

Volatility

(51)

)

,

,

(

2

σ

α

q

V

S

dS

V

=

=

Volatility

q-alpha-sigma Volatility vs. VIX

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 10/28/1995 3/11/1997 7/24/1998 12/6/1999 4/19/2001 9/1/2002 1/14/2004 Sqa ISD VIX Close

(52)

Options look good ….

What about pricing credit?

Borland L, Evnine J, Pochart B, cond-mat/0505359 (2005)

Chirayathumadom R, et al, Investment Practice Report Project, Stanford University (2004)

(53)

Merton Model (1974)

• Equity is a call option on

underlying assets of firm

Assets = Debt + Equity

:

D

A

T

<

Bond holders receive

A

T Stock holders receive 0

:

D

A

T

>

Stock holders receive

A

D

T

(54)

• Key assumptions

- Underlying assets follow stochastic log normal process

- Debt in terms of single zero coupon bond

- Black-scholes valuation for European call option

• Asset Process:

(55)

• Key assumptions

- Underlying assets follow stochastic log normal process

- Debt in terms of single zero coupon bond

- Black-scholes valuation for European call option

• Asset Process:

dA = µA dt + σAdz

• Generalized Process:

(56)

Merton Model and Credit Spread

>

=<

max[

,

0

]

0

A

D

S

T Equity 0 0 0

A

S

D

=

A S A dA dS S0

σ

= 0

σ

Debt

(57)

Merton Model and Credit Spread

>

=<

max[

,

0

]

0

A

D

S

T Equity 0 0 0

A

S

D

=

A S A dA dS S0

σ

= 0

σ

Debt 0

D

De

yT

=

=

−rT

De

D

T

r

y

1

log

0

(58)

Merton Model and Credit Spread

>

=<

max[

,

0

]

0

A

D

S

T Equity 0 0 0

A

S

D

=

A S A dA dS S0

σ

= 0

σ

α α , , 0 0 q rT q

e

DN

M

A

S

=

− Debt 0

D

De

yT

=

=

−rT

De

D

T

r

y

1

log

0

(59)

Analysis

Sectors 1 through 7 are Aerospace, Communication, Construction, Energy, High tech equipment, Financial services and Retail

Q 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 aer os pac e, aut o m a nuf ac tu ri ng, a ir lines C o m m un ic at ion, I T e lec tr ic al , c ons tr uc ti on m a c h iner y ener gy E qui pm en ts (m edi c a l and el ec tr oni c ) F inan c ial s e rv ic es re ta il , per s onal pr oduc ts , f ood pr oc e s s in g

Q values across Industry sectors

1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1 Companies Q q across industries q

(60)

0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 d 0.12 0.17 0.22 0.27 0.32 0.37 q=1, alpha=0 q=1.2, alpha=1 q=1.4, alpha=1 q=1.4, alpha=0.5 q=1.4, alpha=0 Standard model “Reality”

Credit Implied volatility

(61)

Results

- q mainly in range 1.2 – 1.5 and α = 0.3

(62)

Summary

Non-Gaussian model well describes many features of:

Stock Markets Option Markets

Debt and Credit Markets

Now :

(63)

A multi-time scale non-Gaussian model of stock returns [Borland L., cond-mat/0412526 2004] i i j q j i q ij

P

y

y

d

w

W

dy

σ

ω

−∞ = −

=

1

[

(

|

)]

1

)

)

(

)

1

(

1

(

1

2 1 j i ij ij q q

q

y

y

Z

P

=

β

(64)

A multi-time scale non-Gaussian model of stock returns [Borland L., cond-mat/0412526 2004] i i j q j i q ij

P

y

y

d

w

W

dy

σ

ω

−∞ = −

=

1

[

(

|

)]

1

)

)

(

)

1

(

1

(

1

2 1 j i ij ij q q

q

y

y

Z

P

=

β

Motivation: Traders act on all different time horizons

0

j ij

w

=

δ

(65)

More General

A multi-timescale model for volatility [Borland and Bouchaud,(2005)]

τ

ω

σ

i

y

=

)]

[(

1

1 2 j i i j ij

z

y

y

w

W

=

− −∞ =

σ

ARCH-like

(

2

)

2 0

(

y

i

y

j

)

j

i

z

z

z

+

=

τ

(66)

A multi-timescale model for volatility [Borland and Bouchaud,(2005)]

τ

ω

σ

i

y

=

)]

[(

1

1 2 j i i j ij

z

y

y

w

W

=

− −∞ =

σ

ARCH-like

(

2

)

2 1 0

(

)

(

)

)

(

i j

i

j

y

i

y

j

z

y

y

j

i

z

z

z

+

+

=

τ

τ

(67)

A multi-timescale model for volatility [Borland and Bouchaud,(2005)] kurtosis decay

)]

[(

1

1 2 j i i j ij

z

y

y

w

W

=

− −∞ =

σ

τ

ω

σ

i

y

=

a ij

i

j

w

=

(

)

− tails skew elementary timescale

(

2

)

2 1 0

(

)

(

)

)

(

i j

i

j

y

i

y

j

z

y

y

j

i

z

z

z

+

+

=

τ

τ

ARCH-like

(68)

1 0 z z g

τ

α

2

z

Parameters: controls the tails

controls the memory

the elementary time scale

base volatility

(69)

Calibration U n i v e r s a l 1 0 2 min 7 300 / 1 15 . 1 85 . 0 z z z = = = =

τ

α

controls the tails

controls the memory

the elementary time scale

base volatility

(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)

Volatility-Volatility correlation variogram

α − 2

(74)

(Build-up ) and decay of kurtosis

Elementary timescale tau =1/300 day Signature of jumps in real data?

(75)

Multifractal scaling

n

l

A

x

x

l

M

n

(

)

=

|

i + l

i

|

n

=

n ζ

(76)

Evolution of

σ

2 conditioned on an initial volatility

σ

2

e

2s

Volatility relaxation

(77)

Also time-reversal assymmetry

(78)

∞ = + − − = 1 1 2 ) ( l l i i i l y y X α Regression gives

0

.

9

2

z

(79)

Analytic results

Borland,Bouchaud 2005

• Volatility-volatility correlations: decay as • Model well-defined with power-law tails for • Volatility normally diffusive

α

− 2

l

Numerical results

• Tsallis distribution excellent description on all time-scales • Distribution of volatility

• Multifractal scaling • Volatility relaxation

• Time-reversal assymmetry

• Tested premise of model on real data

t z z y ∆ − = ∆ 2 0 2 1 ) (

1

,

1

2

<

α

>

z

Summary

(80)

Implications of model to market

• Soft-calibration (due to long relaxation)

• Model operating close to an instability

• Past price changes do influence future investor

behavior

(81)

Implications for option pricing

• Price depends on past path history :

Low vol period Æ different price than high vol period

• Returns:

Tsallis-Student distributions on all time-scales

q Æ 1 in a predictable way

• Approximation:

Use single-time model with

q(T).

ασ

(82)

Conclusions

- Simple multi-time scale model

-Captures many statistical properties of real returns

-Closed form solution for single time case: options,credit

(83)

References:

Borland L, Phys. Rev.Lett 89 (2002)

Borland L, Quantitative Finance 2 (2002)

Borland L, Bouchaud J-P, Quantitative Finance(2004)

Chirayathumadom R, et al, Investment Practice Report Project, Stanford University (2004) Borland L, cond-mat/04122526 (2004)

Borland L, Evnine J, Pochart B, cond-mat/0505359 (2005) Borland L, Bouchaud J-P, Muzy J-F,

Zumbach G, Wilmott Magazine, (March 2005)

References

Related documents

 The anxiety, worry, or associated symptoms make it hard to carry out day-to-day activities and responsibilities.. They may cause problems in relationships , at

Variation in general combining ability and specific combining abil- ity had been shown from low to high magnitude for various parents to number of number of grains

1) UW DoIT will work to make the Science DMZ infrastructure more accessible for a greater number of use cases on and off campus. 2) UW DoIT will explore the use of sFlow/NetFlow

OPTIMUM LENGTH OF RAISING TIME AND THE RELATION WITH BUSINESS INCOME OF SIMMENTAL-ONGOLE GRADE CROSSBRED BEEF CATTLE.. FATTENING FARM IN WONOSOBO REGENCY-CENTRAL

Many organizations have become aware of such security breach opportunities and have taken sufficient precautionary measures to fortify their information security

The article also presented the results of a pilot experiment and a qualitative evaluation of DS- Hacker which aims to facilitate learning of the BST data structure and

Polaznicima koji posjeduju dobra znanja o računalnim mreža- ma, imaju iskustvo u radu sa Cisco mrežnom opremom i zna- nje na CCNA razini, te kroz ovaj program traže najbrži način za

Customer: 28% of your customers have a profile picture Competitor: 69% of your competitors have a profile picture Group: 50% of the people in your group have a profile picture