• No results found

Nuclear Projects - Current Financial Situation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Nuclear Projects - Current Financial Situation"

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The U.S. Market:

Nuclear Build-out Projects and Prospects, Federal

Loan Guarantees, Alternative and Supplemental

Financing Models

Jim Asselstine

Managing Director

(2)

Outline

Challenges/risks of new nuclear power plant investment

Tools for mitigating financing risk

Loan guarantee program implementation

Other factors

Nuclear economics vs. other available alternatives

(3)

Challenges/Risks of New Nuclear Investment

Magnitude of investment vs. size of the companies

Sponsor market capitalizations range from $5bn to $37bn

Compare with Exxon Mobil at $416bn

Long lead time to plan, license, and construct a new nuclear power plant

Must finance through economic and political cycles

Unique NRC licensing requirement

(4)

Challenges/Risks of New Nuclear Investment

Ability of companies to recover their investment and earn a reasonable return

Regulated utility model

Merchant plant model

Ability to operate the new plants safely and reliably

Ability of the Federal government to fulfill its contractual obligation to take

responsibility for, and ownership of, spent fuel from existing plants;

(5)

Mitigating Financing Risk

Energy Policy Act of 2005 provisions

Production Tax Credit of $18/MWh for up to 6,000 MW; equal to $125mm

per year for eight years for 1,000 MW of capacity

Federal standby delay risk insurance, capped at $500mm per unit for first

two units, and $250mm per unit for next four units

Federal loan guarantees for up to 80% of project cost; $18.5bn of new

nuclear loan volume authorized to date (conditional loan guarantee

commitments for $8.3bn for Vogtle Units 3 & 4)

(6)

Mitigating Financing Risk

For regulated utilities, favorable enhanced state rate recovery mechanisms

Most proposed new units are in states with constructive regulation,

favorable history of support for nuclear, and limited clean energy

alternatives (FL, GA, SC have specific recovery mechanisms; VA also

supportive of baseload development; LA, MS also allow CWIP)

Initial prudency determination

Periodic state review and approval of project costs

Recovery of financing costs during construction

(7)

Loan Guarantee Program Implementation

Of the provisions in EPAct of 2005, loan guarantee offers greatest potential

value in financing new nuclear

Existing loan guarantee funding probably only sufficient to cover one

additional project

Administration’s FY2011 budget request for an additional $36bn in nuclear

loan guarantee capacity, repeated in FY2012 budget request, should be

sufficient

(8)

Loan Guarantee Program Implementation

Regulated utility model: loan guarantee is helpful financing tool

Offers alternative source to cover full project debt financing

Credit subsidy costs likely to be modest, yielding attractive debt financing

cost

(9)

Loan Guarantee Program Implementation

Merchant model: loan guarantee is probably essential to successful

financing

High single asset risk profile and construction risk precludes traditional

nonrecourse project financing

OMB credit subsidy formula creates serious financing cost challenge

Default probability, recovery value inputs drive high subsidy cost

calculation

Likely result is that loan guarantee may be uneconomic for projects that

need it most

(10)

Other Factors

Recession caused electricity consumption to decline 4.3% on average in

2008-09 vs. expected annual growth of 1.5-2%/year

Resulting high reserve margins well in excess of required minimums likely

postpone the need for new baseload generating capacity by 2-4 years or

more

New EPA regulations could force the early retirement of 30-60 GW of older,

predominantly coal-fired generating capacity by 2015-2020, lowering high

reserve margins sooner than expected

(11)

Other Factors

Seeing new CCGT construction projects and acceleration of existing CCGT

projects as near term response to anticipated early coal plant closures

EPA and state regulation of carbon could result in a price on carbon

emissions from fossil-fueled generation in 2015-2020, benefitting nuclear and

renewables economics

(12)

New Nuclear Economics vs. Other Alternatives

Technology

Coal (SCPC)

Project Structure

Project Finance

with Loan

Guarantee

80% Debt

20% Equity

Rate Base with

CWIP

50% Debt

50% Equity

Rate Base with

CWIP

50% Debt

50% Equity

Project

Finance with

Loan

Guarantee

80% Debt

20% Equity

Rate Base with

CWIP

50% Debt

50% Equity

EPC Cost

($/kWe)

$2,250

Total Cost

($/kWe)

$5,500 - $6,100

$4,800 - $5,400

$2,400

$4,700

$4,100

$1,200

$1,200

$1,200

Fuel Cost

(nuclear - $/MWh)

(coal/gas - $/mmBtu)

$2.00

$4.00

$7.00

$10.00

Capacity

(MWe)

800

First Year Busbar

(2009 $/MWh)

$78-$81

$106-$116

$74

$80

$116

$56

$76

$97

Levelized Busbar

(2009 $/MWh)

NA

$80-$86

$59

NA

$87

NA

NA

NA

Impact of CO

2

Price at $30/Ton

(2009 $/MWh)

NA

NA

Add $25.00

400

Add $25.00

Add $18.00

$7.50

$2.00

1,400

600

Coal (IGCC)

Nuclear

Gas (Combined Cycle)

Project Finance

50% Debt

50% Equity

(13)

Current State of Play – Prospects for New Nuclear Development

Very active NRC docket of new plant-related application proceedings

NRC has issued four design certifications for new plant designs; two of these

are referenced in current Combined License (COL) applications

Seven design certification applications now under review, including two

design certification renewal applications and two applications to amend

approved designs; expect three design certifications this year

NRC has issued four Early Site Permits, and is reviewing two additional ESP

applications

(14)

Current State of Play – Prospects for New Nuclear Development

Industry has filed 16 COL applications for up to 25 new units; 12 COL

applications for up to 20 new units are under active NRC review

Several COL applications suspended or delayed due to:

Recession; weak market conditions

Technical issues

Changing the reference design

NRC focusing resources on applications that are likely to obtain financing

and move directly to construction

(15)

Current State of Play – Prospects for New Nuclear Development

By 2013-14, expect three to five NRC-certified designs

NRC likely to issue first two COLs before 2012

Expect most applicants to continue to pursue ESP and COL applications and

then to “bank” permits and licenses for future use

An initial group of four to eight new units likely to proceed to construction in

2012-14, and to enter into commercial operation in 2016-20

(16)

Current State of Play – Prospects for New Nuclear Development

Most of initial units will likely use regulated utility model

In the near term, new merchant nuclear plants face greater challenges given

current market conditions, and will likely require workable loan guarantee

commitments to proceed

Current bifurcated approach allows NRC and industry to focus efforts and

resources on a smaller number of initial projects; improves prospects for

successful outcome

(17)

Analyst Certifications and Important Disclosures

Analyst Certification(s)

I, James K. Asselstine, hereby certify (1) that the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect my personal views about any or all of the subject securities or issuers referred to in this research report and (2) no part of my compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research report

Important Disclosures

For current important disclosures regarding companies that are the subject of this research report, please send a written request to: Barclays Capital Research Compliance, 745 Seventh Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10019 or refer to https://ecommerce.barcap.com/research/cgi-bin/all/disclosuresSearch.pl or call 212-526-1072.Barclays Capital does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that Barclays Capital may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Any reference to Barclays Capital includes its affiliates. Barclays Capital and/or an affiliate thereof (the "firm") regularly trades, generally deals as principal and generally provides liquidity (as market maker or otherwise) in the debt securities that are the subject of this research report (and related derivatives thereof). The firm's proprietary trading accounts may have either a long and / or short position in such securities and / or derivative instruments, which may pose a conflict with the interests of investing customers. Where permitted and subject to appropriate information barrier restrictions, the firm's fixed income research analysts regularly interact with its trading desk personnel to determine current prices of fixed income securities. The firm's fixed income research analyst(s) receive compensation based on various factors including, but not limited to, the quality of their work, the overall performance of the firm (including the profitability of the investment banking department), the profitability and revenues of the Fixed Income Division and the outstanding principal amount and trading value of, the profitability of, and the potential interest of the firms investing clients in research with respect to, the asset class covered by the analyst. To the extent that any historical pricing information was obtained from Barclays Capital trading desks, the firm makes no representation that it is accurate or complete. All levels, prices and spreads are historical and do not represent current market levels, prices or spreads, some or all of which may have changed since the publication of this document. Barclays Capital produces a variety of research products including, but not limited to, fundamental analysis, equity-linked analysis, quantitative analysis, and trade ideas. Recommendations contained in one type of research product may differ from recommendations contained in other types of research products, whether as a result of differing time horizons, methodologies, or otherwise.

Explanation of the High Grade Sector Weighting System

Overweight:Expected six-month excess return of the sector exceeds the six-month expected excess return of the Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Index or Pan-European Credit Index, as

applicable.

Market Weight:Expected six-month excess return of the sector is in line with the six-month expected excess return of the Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Index or Pan-European Credit Index, as

applicable.

Underweight:Expected six-month excess return of the sector is below the six-month expected excess return of the Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Index or Pan-European Credit Index, as

applicable.

Explanation of the High Grade Research Rating System

The High Grade Research rating system is based on the analyst's view of the expected excess returns over a six-month period of the issuer's index-eligible corporate debt securities to the Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Index, the Pan-European Credit Index or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index, as applicable.

Overweight:The analyst expects the issuer's index-eligible corporate bonds to provide positive excess returns relative to the Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Index, the Pan-European Credit

Index, or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index over the next six months.

(18)

Important Disclosures (continued)

This publication has been prepared by Barclays Capital, the investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, and/or one or more of its affiliates as provided below. This publication is provided to you for information purposes only. Prices shown in this publication are indicative and Barclays Capital is not offering to buy or sell or soliciting offers to buy or sell any financial instrument. Other than disclosures relating to Barclays Capital, the information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources that Barclays Capital believes to be reliable, but Barclays Capital does not represent or warrant that it is accurate or complete. The views in this publication are those of Barclays Capital and are subject to change, and Barclays Capital has no obligation to update its opinions or the information in this publication.

The analyst recommendations in this report reflect solely and exclusively those of the author(s), and such opinions were prepared independently of any other interests, including those of Barclays Capital and/or its affiliates. Neither Barclays Capital, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents. The securities discussed in this publication may not be suitable for all investors. Barclays Capital

recommends that investors independently evaluate each issuer, security or instrument discussed in this publication and consult any independent advisors they believe necessary. The value of and income from any investment may fluctuate from day to day as a result of changes in relevant economic markets (including changes in market liquidity). The information in this publication is not intended to predict actual results, which may differ substantially from those reflected. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. This communication is being made available in the UK and Europe to persons who are investment professionals as that term is defined in Article 19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion Order) 2005. It is directed at, and therefore should only be relied upon by, persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments. The investments to which it relates are available only to such persons and will be entered into only with such persons. Barclays Capital is authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority ('FSA') and member of the London Stock Exchange.

Barclays Capital Inc., US registered broker/dealer and member of FINRA (www.finra.org), is distributing this material in the United States and, in connection therewith accepts responsibility for its contents. Any U.S. person wishing to effect a transaction in any security discussed herein should do so only by contacting a representative of Barclays Capital Inc. in the U.S. at 745 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019. This material is distributed in Canada by Barclays Capital Canada Inc., a registered investment dealer and member of IIROC (www.iiroc.ca). Subject to the conditions of this publication as set out above, Absa Capital, the Investment Banking Division of Absa Bank Limited, an authorised financial services provider (Registration No.: 1986/004794/06), is distributing this material in South Africa. Absa Bank Limited is regulated by the South African Reserve Bank. This publication is not, nor is it intended to be, advice as defined and/or contemplated in the (South African) Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 37 of 2002, or any other financial, investment, trading, tax, legal, accounting, retirement, actuarial or other professional advice or service whatsoever. Any South African person or entity wishing to effect a transaction in any security discussed herein should do so only by contacting a representative of Absa Capital in South Africa, 15 Alice Lane, Sandton, Johannesburg, Gauteng 2196. Absa Capital is an affiliate of Barclays Capital. Non-U.S. persons should contact and execute transactions through a Barclays Bank PLC branch or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless local regulations permit otherwise. In Japan, foreign exchange research reports are prepared and distributed by Barclays Bank PLC Tokyo Branch. Other research reports are distributed to institutional investors in Japan by Barclays Capital Japan Limited. Barclays Capital Japan Limited is a joint-stock company incorporated in Japan with registered office of 6-10-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6131, Japan. It is a subsidiary of Barclays Bank PLC and a registered financial instruments firm regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan. Registered Number: Kanto Zaimukyokucho (kinsho) No. 143. Barclays Bank PLC, Hong Kong Branch is distributing this material in Hong Kong as an authorised institution regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. Registered Office: 41/F, Cheung Kong Center, 2 Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong. Barclays Bank PLC Frankfurt Branch is distributing this material in Germany under the supervision of Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin). This material is distributed in Malaysia by Barclays Capital Markets Malaysia Sdn Bhd. Barclays Bank PLC in the Dubai International Financial Centre (Registered No. 0060) is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Barclays Bank PLC-DIFC Branch, may only undertake the financial services activities that fall within the scope of its existing DFSA licence. Barclays Bank PLC in the UAE is regulated by the Central Bank of the UAE and is licensed to conduct business activities as a branch of a commercial bank incorporated outside the UAE in Dubai (Licence No.: 13/1844/2008, Registered Office: Building No. 6, Burj Dubai Business Hub, Sheikh Zayed Road, Dubai City) and Abu Dhabi (Licence No.: 13/952/2008, Registered Office: Al Jazira Towers, Hamdan Street, PO Box 2734, Abu Dhabi). Barclays Bank PLC in the Qatar Financial Centre (Registered No. 00018) is authorised by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority. Barclays Bank PLC-QFC Branch may only undertake the regulated activities that fall within the scope of its existing QFCRA licence. Principal place of business in Qatar: Qatar Financial

References

Related documents

I would like to express my sincerely thanks to WFCC-MIRCEN World Data Center for Microorganisms (WDCM), CODATA Task Group on Advancing Informatics for Microbiology

The aim of research was to analyze the contents of somatic cells (SC) in goat milk in the East of Ukraine, level of SC translocation in the process of milking, speed of SC

We presented three original improvements of the Rekers-Sch¨ urr graph grammar pars- ing algorithm and showed their value by testing them on four meaningful graph grammars. Our

Column (3) shows that the ex-post loss in utility due to model estimation using optimal maximum likelihood estimators is small: When returns follow a GBM in-sample and

If an inmate attempts to send mail to an inmate in another facility or in the same facility, the Warden at the sending facility shall have the authority to intercept the mail

In general a fracture will be stable if the middle column is intact and unstable if it is disrupted, with the following exceptions: in fractures of the thoracic spine involving

This finding corresponds to a relative reduction of 20% in the rate of death from prostate cancer among men between the ages of 55 and 69 years at study entry, given