• No results found

Cost Effectiveness

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Cost Effectiveness"

Copied!
41
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Cost Effectiveness

(2)

Introduction

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a form of economic analysis that

compares the relative costs and outcomes (effects) of different courses of action

It is a method of comparing the cost and effectiveness of two or more

alternatives.

Such comparisons are useful when one of the alternatives being

(3)

The goal of cost-effectiveness analysis to determine if the value of an

intervention justifies its cost.

Cost-effectiveness involves more than determining cost, it also

(4)

Related terms

Cost Effectiveness analysis looks at economic decision making to

weigh up the costs and effects of a particular economic action. It is a way to measure the costs and the benefits from a decision.

In cost–utility analysis the benefits are expressed as quality-adjusted

life-years (QALYs) and in cost–benefit analysis in monetary terms.

(benefits = effects) ≠ effectiveness

Cost–utility analysis is the most sophisticated form of

pharmaco-economic analysis in that it takes into account the improvement in

(5)

Applications

The concept of cost-effectiveness is applied to the planning and

management of many types of organized activity.

It is widely used in many aspects of life.

In the acquisition of military tanks, for example, competing designs

(6)

Applications – cont…

If a tank's performance in these areas is equal or even slightly inferior

to its competitor, but substantially less expensive and easier to

produce, military planners may select it as more cost-effective than the competitor.

Conversely, if the difference in price is near zero, but the more costly

competitor would convey an enormous battlefield advantage through special ammunition, radar fire control and laser range finding,

(7)

Why CEA?

CEA is most useful when analysts face constraints which prevent them

from conducting cost-benefit analysis.

The most common constraint is the inability of analysts to monetise

benefits.

CEA is commonly used in healthcare, for example, where it is difficult

(8)

Calculations

CE ratio = C1/E1EC ratio = E1/C1

where: C1 = the cost of option 1 (in £); and E1 = the effectiveness of option 1 (in

physical units).

The first equation above represents the cost per unit of effectiveness (e.g. £s spent

per life saved).

Projects can be rank ordered by CE ratio from lowest to highest. • The most cost-effective project has the lowest CE ratio.

• The second equation is the effectiveness per unit of cost (e.g. lives saved per £ spent).

(9)
(10)

Cost

Costs are seen differently from different points of view.

In economics the notion of cost is based on the value that would be

gained from using resources elsewhere – referred to as the opportunity cost.

In cost-effectiveness analysis it is conventional to distinguish between

the direct costs and indirect or productivity costs associated with the intervention, as well as what are termed intangibles, which, although they may be difficult to quantify, are often consequences of the

(11)

Different types of costs

Direct costs: medical drugs; staff time; equipment, patient transport;

out-of pocket expenses.

(12)

It is essential to specify which costs are included in a

(13)

Types of interventions

A distinction must be made between those interventions that are

completely independent and mutually exclusive

Independent interventions are those where the costs and effects of

one intervention are not affected by the introduction or otherwise of other interventions

Mutually exclusive interventions are those where implementing one

(14)

Average CEA and incremental CEA

An average C/E ratio is equal to the total cost of a programme divided

by the effectiveness of the prorgamme compared to “doing nothing” (i.e the base-case alternative)

An incremental C/E ratio is the incremental cost of a programme

divided by the incremental effectiveness compared to the next most effective programme

If only one programme is compared with “doing nothing” then the

(15)
(16)
(17)

Discussions

According to cost-effectiveness analysis, program Z should be given

priority over X since it has a lower CER

However, in order to decide which program to implement, the extent

(18)

CEA for mutually exclusive

programs

For mutually exclusive interventions, it is essential to use incremental

(19)

The alternative interventions are ranked according to their

(20)
(21)

Discussions

The negative ICER for P2 means that by adopting P2 rather than P1

there is an improvement in life-years gained and a reduction in costs.

The ICER for P3 works out to be 120, which means that it costs £120

to generate each additional life-year gained compared with P2

(22)

When to use CEA?

CEA is most useful before a program has begun, as it enables the

comparison of two different courses of action. Think about using it at the program design stage therefore as well as at the evaluation stage.

CEA can also be used to build counter-factual scenarios comparing the

(23)

Think about which of CBA or CEA more appropriate? This depends on

how easily benefits can be monetized.

The best cost-effectiveness analyses take a broad view of costs and

benefits, including indirect and longer-term effects, reflecting the interests of all stakeholders who will be affected by the program.

(24)

Cost-effectiveness is only one of a number of criteria that should be

employed in determining whether interventions are made available.

Issues of equity, needs and priorities, for example, should also form

part of the decision-making process

Care should be exercised in interpreting cost-effectiveness studies to

ensure that all underlying assumptions have been made explicit and the context and perspective of the study are adequately reported.

All cost-effectiveness analyses should be subjected to sensitivity

(25)

Sensitivity analysis

The need for sensitivity analysis arises because of a number of

factors. These include:

Methodological issues arising from different approaches and methods employed in the evaluation

Potential variation in the estimates of costs and effects used in the evaluation Extrapolation from observed events over time or from intermediate to final

health outcomes

(26)

Sensitivity analysis – cont…

ICERs therefore require some indication of the confidence that can be

placed in them

What would happen, for example, if the ‘true cost’ of one of the

treatment strategies was somewhat higher or lower than the estimate used in the investigation, or if there were significant changes in the

life-years gained or other parameters used?

Sensitivity analysis tests all the assumptions used in the model and

(27)

Sensitivity analysis – cont…

• The use of probabilistic sensitivity analysis is now recognised as the

appropriate format for undertaking and reporting sensitivity analysis, via a cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curve

These are generated by costs and effects data being simulated repeatedly

(usually 1,000 times) to generate a vector of CERs, which are plotted on the cost-effectiveness plane, and from which the cost-effectiveness

acceptability curve is derived.

This indicates the likelihood that the CER lies below a certain threshold

(28)

When to implement CEA?

Prospective analysis takes place prior to the start of a pilot or at-scale

program

“Roughly how cost-effective could this proposed program be?” “How big an impact must this achieve to meet our threshold?”

Retrospective analysis takes place after an evaluation of the program

is completed

“Exactly how cost-effective was that pilot program?”

“Roughly how cost-effective might this program be if rolled out at

(29)
(30)

Three Key Challenges in Doing CEAs

Absence of incentives to do CEA

What if the program was effective but not really cost-effective?

No editorial requirement to show CEA in most social-science journals Assumptions are required

Number of assumptions are needed to complete the analysis (e.g. multiple outcomes, spillover effects, exchange rates, discounting, inflation, etc.)

(31)

Costs are hard to gather

Collecting cost data not seen as key part of evaluation unlike impact measures, so it is not routinely provided in a standardized way

(32)

CEA Process

A CEA is a multi−step process.

After defining the policy of interest, an analyst conducts a cost

assessment and an effectiveness assessment for each alternative measure for implementing the policy, and then integrates these assessments into a decisional analysis.

In general, CEA is most relevant when different policy measures yield

(33)

CEA process – cont…

First, carrying out a CEA requires identifying the specific policy

objective

Second, the analyst examines to what extent this objective is already

met (distance to target), and establishes a baseline

Third, the analyst identifies the potential sources of pressures and

impacts related to the policy objective

Fourth, the analyst decides which policy interventions can reasonably

(34)

CEA process – cont…

Fifth, the costs of the policy measure need to be determined

The sixth step is to determine the effectiveness: The analyst must

carefully select appropriate measures of effectiveness

(35)
(36)

1. CEA weighs up the financial costs and effects of a particular economic action

(37)

2. CEA is used instead of CBA when: a. You can find the effects of an action b. You can't monetize the benefits

(38)

3. In CE ratios:

(39)

4. Which is not a type of cost: a. Direct

b. Indirect c. Virtual

(40)

5. For mutually exclusive interventions, we use: a. ICER

(41)

References

Related documents

• Dr. David Nash’s ethics presentation, advancing the position that a basic principle of American life is to provide all children equal opportunity to succeed; further, it

Po Caseyevom teoremu zakljuˇ cujemo da pripisane kruˇ znice trokuta i upisana kruˇ znica dodiruju kruˇ znicu devet toˇ caka.. 4.2

The most frequently referenced initiatives include: Identifying and monitoring minority achievement by course and program; faculty development on diverse teaching approaches;

z Payments, such as the reimbursement of certain expenses or the provision of in-kind benefits, to an employee (or former employee) in connection with the employee’s termination may

The RANSAC fitting algorithm that has been implemented here is able to utilise the speed of the scaled rigid template alignment to approximate a consensus set and the accuracy of

The first and second derivatives of the transformation stretch tensor with respect to the order parameters are determined which are used to (i) analyze the transformation work in

The authors [17], too, have derived dispersion curves and attenuation curves for a plate loaded with a fluid using the characteristic that a harmonic plane leaky wave propagates

With classic wind turbine control, the floating tower motion in the fore–aft wind speed direction (pitch- ing) becomes unstable due to positive feedback: At high wind speeds the