• No results found

Flow Measurement Lab Report.docx

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Flow Measurement Lab Report.docx"

Copied!
23
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Comparison of

Comparison of

Diff

Diff

erent

erent

Flow Measurement

Flow Measurement

Devices

Devices

CHEG 2810 - Experiment 1 CHEG 2810 - Experiment 1

Danielle Valdivia, Travis Garlock, and Alex Maldonado

Danielle Valdivia, Travis Garlock, and Alex Maldonado

October 22

(2)

AB!"AC!

(3)

!he purpose of this e#periment was to calculate volumetric flow rates usin$ various flow measurement %evices an% compare their accurac& an% precision' !he three

flow measurement %evices were( rotameter, orifice plate, an% ma$netic flow meter' As it turns out the most accurate an% precise flow meter was the ma$netic flow meter' !he ma$netic flow meter ha% an avera$e of 

2'1) error while the orifice plate an% rotameter ha% a 1*'+) an% 2'*) error respectivel&' !he ma$netic flow meter an% rotameter were both accurate an% precise, but the orifice plate was neither' !his error was more than liel& to be cause% b& inefficienc& in the water collecte% from the output an% for the orifice plate the constant -umpin$ of pressures %i%

not allow accurate rea%in$s' !hese results show that when precision is essential the

rotameter or ma$netic flow meter shoul% be use%' Of these two when the flowrate nee%s to be imme%iatel& nown an% eas& to see chan$es the rotameter is the best

choice'

./!"ODC!.O/ an% BAC"O/D ./FO"MA!.O/

!he rotameter is a versatile process control %evice that can %emonstrate chan$es in flow of various materials3 in both $as an% li4ui% phases' !he %esi$n of the rotameter is %esi$ne% to e#ploit the opposition between the %ownwar% force of $ravit& an% the opposin$ force of the flowin$ flui%' !his force of the flowin$ flui% mainl& comes from the pressure %ifference the  bottom of the rotameter an% the si%es of the rotameter Basics of "otameters, 20026' 7hen the

flui% approaches the bottom of the bob, the velocit& increases %ue to the contraction of the -et streams' 7hen there is a volumetric flow passin$ throu$h the meter, the velocit& of the -et is

$iven b& the e4uation u=q

ca x

where 4 is the flow rate, Cc is the ratio of the

narrowest part of the -et to the area of bob, an% a# as

the area of the tube' .f we substitute this in to Bernoulli8s law we $et

 P1− P2= ρ

2

(

q C ca x

)

2

 which %emonstrates that the pressure %ifference cause% b& the -et stream contraction causes the buo&ant force' 7hen the flow rate is increase% an% the flui% an% rotameter sta& the same6 the pressure %ifference becomes $reater thus increasin$ the buo&ant force

Di-stelber$en, 1+*96' 7hen the buo&ant force is the same as the $ravitational force of the bob ne$lectin$ the $ravitational force of the flui%6 the

 bob reaches e4uilibrium' !his e4uilibrium stabili:es the hei$ht of the bob

relative to the tube an% the velocit& of the flui% can be calculate% usin$ the e4uation

u=

2g V b C Ab

(

 ρb− ρ  ρ

)

7here, Example Rotameter in lab

(4)

• u ; flow velocit& • < b; volume of the bob

• $ ; $ravitational acceleration constant • C ; %ra$ coefficient

• A b ; frontal area of the bob • = b; %ensit& of the bob • =f; %ensit& of the flui%

!his e4uation can calculate the velocit& in an& rotameter with an& incompressible flui%' 7hen usin$ the same rotameter an% flui%, most of the variables remain constant' 7hen usin$ a

rotameter, the selection of %esi$n can simplif& the e4uation further an% lineari:e it prin$stea%, 20156' Q=C m∗ y∗

 ρb− ρ  ρ =C m '  ∗ y 7here,

• > ; volumetric flow rate

• Cm ; variable that contains constants from previous e4uation

!hese e4uations an% theor& show the useful an% versatile the rotameter is to measure flow rate' "otameters are still ver& popular amon$ in%ustrial applications because of cost effectiveness' !he& are relativel& ine#pensive an% provi%e a simple wa& to control flow for a wi%e variet& of substances' 7ith more comple# flowmeters the accurac& an% precision is $reatl& increase% but comes with a heft& price ta$' Overall rotameters are viable options when simplicit& an% cost effectiveness are priorities, an% when precision is top priorit& %ifferent flow meters are better options'

Another wi%el& use% flow meter is calle% the orifice meter an% measures the flow of a li4ui% similar to that of a venturi meter, b& restriction' !he fi#e%?area flow is %ue to a finel& machine% concentric hole within a plate mounte%  perpen%icularl& between

two flan$es' @ressure taps are place% before an% after the machine% plate an% connecte% to a manometer an%or a

%ifferential pressure transmitter' !he cross sectional area of the pipe %iameter is re%uce%, increasin$ the velocit& hea% while %ecreasin$ the pressure hea% McCabe, 226'

 !his re%uction in pressure hea% is what the connecte% %evice measures an% is correlate% to the li4ui% flow rate'

(5)

 Theoretical Magnetic Flow Meter (Cadillac Meters, 2013)

As the li4ui% approaches the orifice plate, a vena contracta forms' !his is where the flui% stream separates itself from the %ownstream si%e of the orifice plate an% forms a -et in the %ownstream li4ui% an% where the li4ui% is as its minimum cross section' !his is a $oo% location for the tap to  be place% so that the meter ma& measure the %ownstream velocit&' !his st&le of tap is calle% the

vena contracta tap an% will have a static hole one?half to two pipe %iameters from the orifice  plate an% the other locate% at the vena contracta @err&, ?96' !hese t&pe of taps $ive the lar$est

%ifferential hea% for a $iven flow rate' !he flow rate e4uation is $iven below'

Q= C d A2

1−

(

 A2  A1

)

2

2

(

 p1− p2

)

 ρ 7here

• p1?p26 ; the pressure %rop • = ; the %ensit&

• A1 ; the pipe cross?sectional area • A2 ; the orifice cross?sectional area • C% ; the %ischar$e coefficient

!he %ischar$e coefficient chan$es with "e&nol%8s /umber at the orifice, base% on the orifice %iameter an% velocit& @err&, 10?1*6' !his number will increase with e%$e?roun%ness of the machine% hole in the plate' /ear the orifice plate on the %ownstream si%e of li4ui%, e%%ies form in the li4ui% %ue to lar$e friction losses' !hese friction losses account for the poor pressure recover& of an orifice meter an% its lar$est %isa%vanta$e' @ower losses nee% to be supplemente% with pumpin$ e4uipment'

!he ma$netic flow meter is a more a%vance% %evice use% to measure the flow rate of a flui%' 7hen usin$ this %evice, a ma$netic fiel% is sprea% throu$hout the measurin$ tube3 the ions flowin$ within the flui% create a potential %ifference to be measure% b& the flow meter' !his potential %ifference is proportional to the flow velocit& of the flui%' .n or%er to use a

ma$netic flow meter to measure a flow?rate, the flui% must be con%uctin$, an% the pipe must be insulatin$' Ma$netic flow meters are most useful in that the& are a non?contact, non?movin$ flow meter, which is ver& useful when measurin$ the flow rate of a %irt& li4ui% or wastewater material that is water?base%'

!he ma$netic flow meter is base% on the principle of Fara%a&8s aw' !his states that the volta$e across a con%uctor as it moves perpen%icular to the ma$netic fiel% lines is proportional to the velocit& of that con%uctor Ma$netic Flow Meters, 20156' Fara%a&8s aw is represente% b& the e4uation(

(6)

 E=V ∗B∗ D

7here,

• E ; volta$e $enerate% in a con%uctor, • < ; velocit& of that con%uctor,

• B ; ma$netic fiel% stren$th,

• D ; len$th of the con%uctor bein$ measure%'

Each ma$netic flow meter is fitte% to a ma#imum flow that can be measure% b& that  particular flow meter' !he in%uce% potential an% the measure% flow are compare% to the

ma#imum permitte% potential an% ma#imum measurable flow, respectivel& prin$stea%, 20156' !he %ispla&e% value on the ma$netic flow meter can either be the %irect flow measurement, or a percenta$e of the ma#imum measurable flow of the flow meter'

Ma$netic flow meters are one of the most common t&pes of flow meters use% in in%ustr&' !he& are use% for their relative ease an% their nown accurac&' Ma$netic flow meters are much less cost effective than other flow meters but are much more e#act in their

measurement' Ma$netic flow meters also come with the caveat that onl& con%uctin$ flui%s ma& be measure%, which proves them to be ina%e4uate in man& in%ustrial situations'

enerall&, ma$netic flow meters are use% when precision is necessar&, an% when con%uctive flui%s are involve%'

(7)

ME!OD@"O!OCO

Rotameter

7hen there is not a flow throu$h the rotameter, the bob is at the lowest point in the tube' Mar this point on a piece of tape on the si%e of the rotameter' !his will be the initial point when tain$ hei$ht measurements' Open the valves an% allowin$ a small flow throu$h the pipes an% observe the small increase in hei$ht of the bob' Allow the s&stem to fin% e4uilibrium from turbulent flow to more of a laminar flow' !ae a ruler an% measure from the initial point to the point where the  bob is when water is flowin$ throu$h' 7hile tain$ the bob hei$ht measurement, for five

secon%s fill a bucet with the output water' !hen wei$h the bucet an% recor% the mass of the water'

Orifice Plate

enerall&, a manometer will measure the pressure %rop b& correlatin$ it to the hei$ht of flui% in the two le$s of the manometer' owever, the %i$ital manometer use% in this lab will correlate the %ifference between the mechanical pressures on two trans%ucers locate% at the taps' !his will $ive a similar rea%in$ to the %ifferential pressure trans%ucer which will %ispla& as mA' !he

lower the flow rate, the lower the mechanical pressure an% therefore, the lower the rea%in$ on  both meters' 7hen the e#periment is starte%, there is no flow throu$h the orifice plate an% both

meters will rou$hl& rea% close to :ero' As the flow rate increases throu$h the pipin$ at each step interval, so too %oes the rea%in$ on each meter' Each time the flow rate is increase%, the s&stem is allowe% to e4uilibrate before flow measurements are taen with a bucet an% a stop watch' !he amount of water in the $iven time is then measure% for mass an% recor%e%, resultin$ in a flow rate versus pressure %rop $raph'

Magnetic Flow Meter

First, ensure that the ma$netic flow meter rea%s :ero when there is no flow throu$h the pipe' !hen open the appropriate valves allowin$ a small flow throu$h the pipe that the flow meter is attache% to' Also mae sure that after the water passes throu$h the flow meter, the water

continues throu$h the pipes an% into the output tan without flowin$ throu$h the other two flow meters' Once the s&stem has reache% e4uilibrium, recor% the percenta$e %ispla&e% on the flow meter3 this percenta$e represents a percent of the ma#imum measurable flow of the flow meter' As the measurement is recor%e%, for five secon%s fill a bucet with output water from %irectl& from the pipe' !hen wei$h the bucet an% recor% the mass of the water collecte%' Be sure to tare the bucet before each water sample is collecte%' .ncrease the flow of the s&stem, allow it to reach e4uilibrium, an% perform another sample collection an% measurement' Do this until there are between five an% ten %ata points'

(8)

"E!

Avera$e Mass of Output 7ater  $6 ei$ht of  Bob cm6 Actual <olumetric Flow "ate

(

m 3 s

 )

Measure% "otameter  Flow "ate

(

m 3 s

 )

@ercent Error  0'2 1'G 0'000199 0'0001G2 +'*) 1'5* G'2 0'000G12 0'000G1+ 1'+) 2'09 9'1 0'00090+ 0'00090 0'G) 2'59 5'G 0'00050+ 0'000525 G'1) G'12 *'9 0'000*25 0'000*G9 1'9) G'* ' 0'000G 0'000*1 1'5) 9'92 '+ 0'0005 0'0000 0'*) Rotameter

.n theor& the rotameter shoul% be the least accurate of three teste% flow measurement %evices' owever it finishe% as the secon% most accurate %evice in this e#periment' !here are several reasons for this specific apparatus which will be covere% in the orifice plate section of the results' .n the chart to the ri$ht, the actual volumetric flow rate is the calculate% flow rate from the water output' !his is calculate% b& usin$ the mass of water an% %ensit& of the water which is affecte%  b& the temperature which was 1 ⁰C for all rotameter trials' V 

 (

m

3

)

= M ( Kg)

 ρ( Kg

m3)  !his is the total

volume of the output water which when %ivi%e% b& the time the water was collecte% $ives us the flow rate' For this e#periment each sample was collecte% for five secon%s' An e#ample

calculation woul% be as follows,

Q=  M   ρ t  = 2.04kg 998.6 kg m3 5s = 0.002043m3 5s =0.000407 m3 s

sin$ the hei$ht of the bob when collectin$ the output water we can $raph how the volumetric flow rate affects the hei$ht of the bob' Fin%in$ the linear relationship of the %ata set provi%es an e4uation to calculate the flow rate that hei$ht represents in the rotameter' For this %ata set, the linear re$ression e4uation with a " 2 value of 0'++ is,

Q=9.84110−5∗h+3.69810−6

!his can be use% to calculate the flow rate reporte% from the rotameter' !his is measure% flowrate in the above table an% the percent error is the %ifference in the actual an% e#perimental %ata'

(9)

Overall the rotameter was accurate an% precise with e#ception to the first trial which proves the reliabilit& of the rotameter'

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  ! 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

"(#) $ 0# % 0

&' $ 1

 The &elationshi etween the *eight o" +o+ and ,ol-.etric Flow &ate

*eight o" o++er (c.) ,ol-.etric Flow &ate (.3/s)

Orifice Plate

!he orifice plate meter was actuall& the least accurate of the meters teste% partl& %ue to the

e%%ies formin$ where the %ownstream pressure sensor was locate%, causin$ constant fluctuation in the manometer an% %ifferential pressure $au$e' .n or%er to 4uantif& the accurac& of this meter, the actual flow rate an% the theoretical flow rates nee%e% to be compare% an% anal&:e% for

 percenta$e error' !o %o this, the actual flow rate was measure% b& the amount of water e#itin$ the apparatus in a $iven amount of time'

Mass Output of 7ater $6 H@ressure6 Hmm$66 !heoretical <olumetric Flowrate mGs6 Actual <olumetric Flowrate mGs6 ) Error  2'2* 2'+5 0'00095G 0'00099912 * 2'1 G'90* 0'0009G 0'0005*0+ 15'+ 2' G'21 0'0005 0'000*+10G 1'+ 2'2 9'G2 0'000595 0'00051202 25'* G'G* 9'01 0'000*G 0'000299 1'+

B& tain$ the mass of the water comin$ out of the s&stem an% %ivi%in$ it b& the %ensit& of water, the volume of water can be calculate%' !his can then be %ivi%e% b& the amount of time taen to $ain that volume of water to arrive at the volumetric flowrate' !his volumetric flowrate will be

(10)

the actual flowrate use% to %etermine the accurac& of the flow meter when compare% to the theoretical %ata' !he theoretical %ata is $aine% from the e4uation(

where C% is assume% to be a constant' !his woul% be %one with all remainin$ samples an% the error calculate%' !he table below %epicts the calibration curve for the measure% %ata $aine% from the e#periment an% shows the tren%line an% "2 value for that tren%line'

Magnetic Flow Meter Mass of Output 7ater $6 @ercent of  Ma#imum Flow Actual <olumetric Flow?rate mGs6 Measure% <olumetric Flow?rate mGs6 @ercent Error  0'*9 *' 0'00012205 0'00012+G* 0'5) 0' *'+ 0'000190229 0'0001G29 5'G1) 2'21 2G' 0'0009920 0'00095*0* G'02) 2'9 2'9 0'00059 0'00059*5GG 0'9G) G'0 G2'5 0'000*19+9 0'000*259G9 1'0) 9'1 92' 0'000G5GG 0'0002129 1'*G)

(11)

Base% on research an% on theor&, the results of the ma$netic flow meter were as we woul% e#pect, in that it was the most accurate of the three flow meters use% in this e#periment' !he %ispla& on the ma$netic flow meter rea%s out the percent of the ma#imum flow rate that is bein$ measure%' From this we nee% to calculate the ma#imum flow rate of our specific flow meter' .n or%er to %o this, we use the e4uation(

 Fl! "at#= P#"c#$t fl!∗ Max % fl! "at#

7e %o this m& solvin$ for the ma#imum flow rate usin$ our recor%e% percent flows an% the flow rate that is obtaine% b& %ivi%in$ the volume of water collecte% b& the time it was collecte% in' A sample calculation is as follows(

 Max% fl! "at#= fl! "at#  p#"c#$t fl!= &l % f !at#" t'm#  p#"c#$t fl! = 0.0007m3 5s#c 0.069 =0.00203327 m3 s#c

After performin$ all of the in%ivi%ual calculations, we tae an avera$e to %etermine the most appro#imate ma#imum flow rate' Our avera$e value was 0'001+29912 mIGs' 7e then use this e4uation a$ain onl& this time we solve for the flow rate usin$ the percent flow observe% an% the ma#imum flow rate we -ust calculate%' A sample calculation is shown below(

 Fl! "at#= p#"c#$t fl!∗ Max % fl! "at#=0.069∗0.0019244 m

3

s#c=0.000132784 m3 s#c

!his calculation was %one on all measure% percent flows' !hen the& were compare% to the flow rates from the first e4uation an% a percent error was foun%' .n all of our sample observations, we can see that the ma$netic flow meter was a ver& accurate flow measurement %evice'

(12)

D.C.O/

Rotameter

!he theoretical or actual %ata woul% be the volumetric flow rate of the water output' As shown in the $raph below the e#perimental %ata is accurate an% precise' owever, there is some

%iscrepanc& in the %ata an% when there is nee% for e#tremel& precise measurement a rotameter shoul% suffice' 7hen simplicit& is of importance an% 4uic compairson of the chan$e in flow rate the rotameter is the best option'

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  ! 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

#eri.antal ata Co.ared to Theoretical ata

 Theor #eri.ental

*eight o" o+ (c.) ol-.etric Flow &ate (.3/s)

Orifice Plate

!he orifice plate flow meter ha% a $reat amount of error when it came to theoretical an% actual flow rate comparison3 the $raph on the ne#t pa$e %epicts this %iscrepanc&' From the results section concernin$ the orifice meter, the calibration curve showe% a tren%line with the "2 value  bein$ 0'+9* which, while close to 1, is much smaller a number than shoul% be for an accurate

rea%in$' !his is most liel& %ue to the e%%ies formin$ in the %ownstream pipin$ as these can cause a lar$e %ifferentiation of manometer rea%outs' !he manometer use% woul% fluctuate

consistentl&, main$ rea%out values more ran%omi:e% than accurate' !he four to five values that the manometer woul% rea% were avera$e% to mae a more realistic an% more accurate assumption of the values'

(13)

Magnetic Flow Meter

As we can %epict from the $raph below, our e#perimental %ata fits the theoretical %ata closel&' !here is ver& little error between the measure% volumetric flow rates an% the theoretical

volumetric flow rates' !his proves that our e#periment follows the research in that the ma$netic flow meter is the most accurate of the three flow meters in this e#periment' .f the precision of flow measurement is of utmost importance, then the ma$netic flow meter shoul% be the

(14)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

#eri.ental ata s Theoretical ata

#eri.ental Theor

ercent o" Ma#i.-. Flow ol-.etric Flow &ate

(15)

CO/C.O/

Out of the three flow meters teste% throu$hout this e#periment, the ma$netic flow meter was foun% to be the most accurate while the orifice plate meter was the least accurate3 the rotameter was foun% to be somewhere in between but on the hi$her accurac& si%e of the spectrum' Each of  these were not e#act forms of measurement as the& each ha% error when comparin$ theoretical to actual flow rates, which is to be e#pecte%' !he $reatest source of error came from the orifice  plate meter with over 1*) error an% the smallest from the ma$netic flow meter at 2) err or'

ince the purpose of the e#periment was to calculate volumetric flow rates an% compare accuracies of the three meters, it woul% behoove a process plant to utili:e a ma$netic meter or rotameter in the fiel% rather than an orifice meter, strictl& on an accurac& stan%point' .f a flowrate was of imme%iate importance, a rotameter shoul% be use%'

(16)

"ECOMME/DA!.O/

.f we were to repeat this e#periment, there woul% be a couple of thin$s that we woul% %o

%ifferentl& to mae sure our e#periment ha% smaller error' !he first thin$ we woul% %o is to fi# all the pipin$3 the pipe that the orifice plate was attache% to ha% a lea in it' !his lea coul% throw off our measurements for flow an% increase our percent error' Another a%-ustment we woul% mae to this lab woul% be to use a more precise collection metho%' Althou$h the metho% we use% was ver& accurate, usin$ an automate% collection tool woul% allow us to collect output water for e#actl& five secon%s' 7ith our manual collection, there is alwa&s room for some error when timin$ an% hol%in$ the bucet' A thir% chan$e we woul% mae to this lab woul% be to increase the flow rate b& smaller increments' !his woul% allow us to tae more %ata points, which woul% &iel% a more reliable %ata tren%'

(17)

"EFE"E/CE

Di-stelber$en, ' 1+*96' "otameter %&namics' Chemical Engineering Science, 19, 5G?*5'

Ma$netic Flow Meters' 20156' Omega Engineering."etrieve% October 20, 2015, from

http(www'ome$a'compro%infoma$meter'html

Mechanical Flow Meters vs Ma$netic Flow Meters' 201G, Februar& 96' "etrieve% October 20, 2015, from http(ca%illacmeter'com201G0209mechanical?flow?meters?vs?ma$netic?flow? meters

prin$stea%, J' 20156' Data Ac4uisition an% an%lin$ aborator& Manual' !he Basics of "otameters' 2002, October 16' "etrieve% October 1*, 2015, from http(www'sensorsma$'comsensorsflowthe?basics?rotameters?10*

McCabe, 7arren ', Julian C' mith, an% @eter arriott' 20056' nit of Operations of Chemical En$ineerin$' th' /ew Kor( Mcraw?ill, p$ 22

@err&, "obert ' an% reen, Don 7' 1++6' @err&8s Chemical En$ineers8 an%boo' th' /ew Kor( Mcraw?ill' p$ ?9, 10?1*

(18)

A@@E/D.CE

 Appendix A: ata c!llecti!n !" r!tameter.

ei$ht of  "otameter cm6 Mass of 7ater  Output $6 !emperature of  7ater Output ⁰C6 !ime of collecte% 7ater Output s6 Densit& of 7ater  $mG6 1'G 0'2 1 5 ++'* G'2 1'5* 1 5 ++'* 9'1 2'09 1 5 ++'* 5'G 2'59 1 5 ++'* *'9 G'12 1 5 ++'* ' G'* 1 5 ++'* '+ 9'92 1 5 ++'*

 Appendix #: Calc$lati!n% "!r the!retical r!tameter data

<olume of 7ater Output mG6

<olumetric Flow "ate of  7ater Output mGs6 0.72kg 998.6 kg m3 =0.000721   0.000721m 3 5s =0.000144 1.56kg 998.6 kg m3 =0.001562   0.001562m 3 5s =0.000312 2.04kg 998.6 kg m3 =0.002043   0.002043m 3 5s =0.000409 2.54kg 998.6 kg m3 =0.002544   0.002544m 3 5s =0.000509 3.12kg 998.6 kg m3 =0.003124   0.003124m 3 5s =0.000625 3.86kg 998.6 kg m3 =0.003865   0.003865m 3 5s =0.000773 4.42kg 998.6 kg m3 =0.004426   0.004426m 3 5s =0.000885

(19)

 Appendix C: Calc$lati!n !" experimental "l!& rate !" r!tameter c!mpared t! act$al "l!& rate !" r!tameter 

7hen plottin$ the e#perimental volumetric flow rate in respect to the measure% hei$ht of the bobber, we can use a linear re$ression tren% line to fin% an e4uation that calculates the volumetric flow rate from the hei$ht' !his e4uation is

Q=9.84110−5∗h+3.69810−6

7here,

• > ? <olumetric Flow "ate mGs6

•  ? Chan$e in vertical hei$ht of bob from reference point cm6

An e#ample calculation for 9'1 cm woul% be

Q=9.84110−5∗(4.1)+3.69810−6=0.000407m

3

s

!he percent error is calculate% usin$

 P#"c#$t E"""=

|

 Exp#"'m#$tal−(h#"#t'cal

(h#"#t'cal

|

∗100 Measure% Flow "ate mGs6 @ercent Error  0'0001G2

|

0.0001320.000144 0.000144

|

∗100=9.6 0'000G1+

|

0.000319−0.000312 0.000312

|

∗100=1.9

(20)

0'00090

|

0.0004070.000409 0.000409

|

∗100=0.3 0'000525

|

0.000525−0.000509 0.000509

|

∗100=3.1 0'000*G9

|

0.000634−0.000625 0.000625

|

∗100=1.4 0'000*1

|

0.0007610.000773 0.000773

|

∗100=1.5 0'0000

|

0.000880−0.000885 0.000885

|

∗100=0.6

(21)

 Appendix :

 Appendix G: ata C!llecti!n !" 'agnetic (l!& 'eter 

@ercent Ma#imum Flow Mass of 7ater  Output $6 !emperature of  7ater Output C6 !ime of Collecte% 7ater Output s6 Densit& of 7ater  $mIG6 *' 0'*9 1+ 5 ++'9 *'+ 0' 1+ 5 ++'9 2G' 2'21 1+ 5 ++'9 2'9 2'9 1+ 5 ++'9 G2'5 G'0 1+ 5 ++'9 92' 9'1 1+ 5 ++'9

 Appendix H: Calc$lati!n% "!r )he!retical 'agnetic (l!& 'eter ata

<olume of 7ater Output mG6

<olumetric Flow "ate of  7ater Output mGs6 0.64kg 998.4 kg m3 =0.000641   0.000641m 3 5s =0.0001282 0.70kg 998.4 kg m3 =0.0007011   0.0007011m 3 5s =0.000140 2.21kg 998.4 kg m3 =0.002214   0.002214m 3 5s =0.0004427 2.74kg 998.4 kg m3 =0.002744   0.002744m 3 5s =0.0005489 3.07kg 998.4 kg m3 =0.003075   0.003075m 3 5s =0.000615 4.17kg 998.4 kg m3 =0.004177   0.004177m 3 5s =0.0008353

(22)

 Appendix *: Calc$lati!n% "!r c!mparing experimental "l!& rate !" the magnetic "l!& meter t! the!retical  "l!& rate !" the magnetic "l!& meter.

!he percent error is calculate% usin$ the same e4uation use% previousl& in this lab'

 P#"c#$t E"""=

|

 Exp#"'m#$tal−(h#"#t'cal

(h#"#t'cal

|

∗100 Measure% Flow "ate mGs6 @ercent Error  0'00012+G*

|

0.000129−0.000128 0.000128

|

∗100=¿ 0'0001G29

|

0.0001330.000140−0.000140

|

∗100=1.9 0'00095*0*

|

0.0004560.000443−0.000443

|

∗100=0.3 0'00059*5GG

|

0.0005460.000549−0.000549

|

∗100=3.1 0'000*259G9

|

0.0006250.000615−0.000615

|

∗100=1.4 0'0002129

|

0.0008220.000835−0.000835

|

∗100=1.5

 Appendix +: Ori"ice ata "r!m experimentati!n

@ressure mm$6 Mass of 7ater $6 !emperature of 7ater  C6 !ime s6 5'1 2'2* 1+ 5 9' 2'1 1+ 5 'G 2' 1+ 5 '9 2'2 1+ 5

(23)

11'G G'G* 1+ 5

 Appendix : Calc$lated Ori"ice ata @ressure6 Hmm$66 Denist& of 7ater  <olume of 7ater mG6 <olumetric Flow "ate mGs6 Measure% Flow "ate ms6 @ercent Error  2'+5 ++'9 0'0022*G*22 0'00095G 0'00099912 * G'90* ++'9 0'0021G9+9 0'0009G 0'0005*0+ 15'+ G'21 ++'9 0'0029*15 0'0005 0'000*+10G 1'+ 9'G2 ++'9 0'00229G5+ 0'000595 0'00051202 25'* 9'01 ++'9 0'00GG*5G5 0'000*G 0'000299 1'+

References

Related documents

Following a scoping review of self-management programmes and self- management experiences of PwMS reported in the literature, a field study involving focus group interviews with

 Health care institutions must collect information about their recognition and response systems for deteriorating patients and resuscitation processes, provide feedback

Given that non-adoption is occurring, and older adults are increasing, and the role of internet- based products and services is growing, for this research study, comparisons in terms

The method utilises a combination of case based reasoning and probability theory to identify similarities between historical data records and the product under assessment, to

Knowledge Management is used here as an umbrella term, including subsets of appl ications useful to the supply chain firm (process management, etc.), the information systems needed

Villajoyosa, Benidorm,  Altea, Calpe, Xàbia o Dénia nacieron como “poblas novas”, funda- das por los monarcas cristianos para aglutinar la vida, colonizar un territorio semivirgen

AG ¶ 19(g): failure to file annual Federal, state, or local income tax returns as required or the fraudulent filing of the same. The evidence reflects that Applicant has

Figure 12 shows the previous microfluidic device and trapping structures that were previously tested to study the myelination of neuronal aggregates.. The goal of this thesis is