Renewable Energy
Study and Research Programme
Since 1st Jan 2003
University of Jyväskylä
-International Science University
•
Seven faculties (Natural Science, Social Sciences,
Economics,…) & nine institutes
•
2500 employers,16 000 students
Faculty of Mathematics and Science
•
Departments of Biology, Chemistry and Physics
•
47 professors, 440 staff, c.a. 2000 students
•
Nanoscience Center, 13 professors, >100 senior researchers and
Ph.D students
•
Renewable Energy Program, 1+4 professors, 5 staff
•
Jyväskylä Summer School, all science disciplines + information
technology, since 1991, 300-400 Ph.D. students and 30-40 teachers
from all over the world attend annually
•Focus on renewable energy areas that have received
little attention in Finland and on promotion of use of
renewables on regional and national level
•Multidisciplinary approach combining scientific, technical,
economical, environmental and social aspects in teaching
and research
1. Technology
Physics, chemistry and
simulation of RE production
Renewable Energy
Study and Research Programme
M.Sc. Programmes
2. Environment
Bioenergy production technology,
environmental impacts and energy
RE-laboratory at Vaajakoski
Biogas technology
Sustainable production
and utilisation of
bioenergy
Hydrogen technology
Solar energy
•
Staff
: 1+4 professors, research director, 2 researchers,
coordinator, laboratory engineer
•
61 M.Sc. students: master thesis topics from industries &
companies, regional development organization
•
10 PhD students, including 2 (out of 5) of Graduate
School of Energy Science and Technology (funded by
Academy of Finland)
-Biogas production and upgrading technology
Prof. Jukka Rintala
-Biomass combustion and gasification
Prof. Jukka Konttinen
Research Director Martti Aho
-Hydrogen technology
Lab.eng. Arjo Heinsola
-
Solar energyProf. Jouko Korppi-Tommola Dr. Jussi Maunuksela
Professors and their research
interests
•
Bioenergy:
- Small scale combustion
- Gasification
- Particle emissions
- Biomethane and biohydrogen
•
Solar energy
-
DSSC, silicon PV
- Heat collectros
•
Integrated systems
- ABC service station
- Solar and wind based H
2production, storage and use
•
Economics
-LCA, evaluation of the energy chains
•
Social aspects
local social effects, developing countries
•
Environmental issues
- Disposal of by-products - Emission control
- Sustainability of biomass production - GHG impacts
Other related projects on campus
•
Black liquor combustion
Biogas research
Study of source materials
--sewage sludgesewage sludge --manuremanure
--wastewaterswastewaters --biowastebiowaste --energy cropsenergy crops
Purification
-CO2 -water -H2S
•
For heat and electricity
production (CHP), raw gas
•
Upgraded biogas
- powering vehicles
- fuel cells
•
Storage & distribution
- local fill up stations
- injection to natural gas nets
POST-STORAGE
TANK PRE-STORAGE DIGESTER TANK ANIMAL HOUSING CHP MIX/PRE-TRT ROOM BIOGAS UPGRADING
Micro-CHP-burner at Vaajakosken laboratory
(under construction)
Fuel pellets
Stirling engine 10kWe Heat exchanger
’Aurinkoenergia Suomessa’
YmpäristötekniikkamessutVaajakoski Research laboratory
Solar collector research
-TiNOx flat plate -vacuum collector
-absorbing liquid collector -pressed collectors
Energy solution of ABC Viitasaari gas station
•
Target:
97 % of the heat and electricity from renewable sources. Also
demonstration of renewable energy technology to public.
•
Means of realization:
Distributed heat and power production using
biomass, solar and wind energy, and heat from Lake Keitele.
•
Funding:
Ministry of Trade and Industry, Keskimaa Osk., City of
Viitasaari, the European Social Fund and the European Regional
Development Fund, State Provincial Office of Western Finland
63.07
°
N
25.86°E
Flat plate collectors TiNOxcoating Area 38 m2 32 kWp, Tilat 35° Facing south
Lake heat (blue) 133 MWh/y, ca. 60% of total heat need, payback time 10 - 15y, rest from biomass
Combined lake and Solar heat
ABC Viitasaari 2005-2007 0 2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000 14 000 16 000 18 000 20 000 22 000 24 000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kuukausi JŠrvilŠmpš AurinkolŠmpš k W h (heat/month)
ABC-liikennemyymälä, Viitasaari Sähköntuotantolukuja
92 m2amorfinen pii
Kallistus 5°, suuntaus etelään Huipputeho 4,2 kWp ABC Viitasaari 2005-2007 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kuukausi TuulisŠhkš AurinkosŠhkš
Saarijärvi School photovoltaics (PV) system
HIT (Heterojunction with Intrinsic Thin
layer) PV technology
Cell and module efficiencies 18,4 % and
16,5 %, respectively.
Source: SANYO/HIT Photovoltaic Module
Installed on roof
facing south, tilt
30 degrees
SaarijŠrven aurinkosŠhkšpaneelisto (A = 37,95 m2) 21. maaliskuuta, 2008 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Paikallinen standardiaika
Sunny day
Fri 21st March 2008
PV_HIT_6kW_Saarijärvi 2006 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month
Production by month in 2006
Max. output 6,2 kW
Total output 5220 kWh
Total area 38 m
2Investment 29,8 k€
Price/kWh 22 cn
25 years, 6% interest rate,
7% annual increase in electricity price
http://80.246.169.132/ya/keli/valikko/default.asp
Observe beneficial production in the spring time, no leafs, reflection from snow, cold temperatures additional bonuses
850 kWh/y in Berlin for 1 kWp panel 870 kWh/y in Saarijärvi for 1 kWppanel 1600 -1800 kWh/y in sunny regions of the planet
Hyrdrogen production
and storage
combined solar (3kW)
and wind (3kW) power
Dye sensitized nanocrystalline
semiconductor films
TiO
2ZnO
Doctor blading spread of TiO
2Static press
• 5.1 % efficiency
Calendered
• 4.7 % efficiency
under 1/10 sun illumination
ITO coated plastic substrate
Two pressed cells in series
Rate of forward electron injection
e
-e
-+
electrolyte
h
Model for electron in RuN3 sensitized TiO
2film
Electron injection:
a) from excited
nonthermalized
singlet
state, 60% (A)
Time constant ~50 fs
b) from excited
relaxed triplet
state, 40% (D)
Nonexponential
Time constants 1ps – 60 ps
Competing reaction to singlet injection
Probing RuN3
+formation at 860 nm at 535 nm
and 675 nm excitations
Signals normalized to the number of absorbed photons
Early parts up to one ps of RuN3 in solution and on TiO2 identical at 675 nm excitation => rise due to triplet population. At later time ps injection becomes visible for RuN3 on TiO2
From relative amplitudes of the cation signals it is estimated that triplet injection at 675 nm excitation is about 50% less efficient than at 535 nm excitation.
NK1
NK7
dyes from Nippon Kayaku Inc.
NK1 and NK2 4.7%
Electron transfer from oranic aminophenyl dyes
to nanocrystalline TiO
2films
NK7
Transient absorption results,
450 nm exc
.
(15 fs), broad band probe ( 7 fs)No stimulated emission observed
In Al2O3 long lived ESA at 530 nm
In TiO2 ESA decays at 530 nm 270 fs matching the
absorption rise at 550 nm and 580 nm where cation was predicted to absorb (tri-aryl cation is a strong
NK7
Transient absorption results,
450 nm exc
.
(15 fs), broad band probe (< 10 fs)Extremely short lived transient observed at 580 nm after excitation both in Al2O3and in TiO2with amplitude
about one quater in the latter and decay about 40 fs
Lowering the series resistance in DSSC’s
TiO2 covered metal rod arrays electrochemistry + ALD
Problems of transferring the rods on the conductig substrate. So far too crowded for dye
and electrolyte loading.
Single crystalline ZnO nanorods
TiO2
Al2O3/TiO2 Al2O3
N3 cation formation probed with
800 nm fs pulse after 530 nm excitation
spe0247ts.AS1 Simulated O Al Si Ti In Sn Counts 6,400 6,200 6,000 5,800 5,600 5,400 5,200 5,000 4,800 4,600 4,400 4,200 4,000 3,800 3,600 3,400 3,200 3,000 2,800 2,600 2,400 2,200 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 Energy [keV] O Al Ti RBS-results T. Sajavaara, JU phys
barrier coating (ALD) on nanocrystalline TiO
2films
3D image of a TiO2 pad
Photoactive electrode:
Ruthenium dye-sensitized TiO
2film
Spread TiO
2Press
Cut & Clean
substrates
Other components
Hotmelt frame
Sensitization
Assembly
Counter electrode
Platinized conductive nanoparticles (Pt-SnO
2:Sb)
Spread
Pt-SnO
2:Sb
Press
Cut & Clean
Dynamic press
TiO
2Cond. substrate
Pressure
Metal plate
Cond. substrate
TiO
2Press plate
Static press
Examples of studied issues:
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.00 -0.05 -0.10 -0.15 -0.20 -0.25 -0.30 -0.35 C urrent [mA cm -2 ] Voltage [V]Spreading methods
• Control coater
• Film applicator
• Gravure printing
Composition of the pastes
• Viscosity (solid content, solvent)
• Additives (cellulose)
Film thicknesses
• TiO
2• Pt-ATO
Electrolyte
-0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1.0 -1.2 Current [ mA cm -2 ]Hannu Häkkinen Michael Walter Ville Mäkinen Cristian Manzoni Dario Polli Giulio Cerullo Hisateru Inoue University of Jyväskylä Physics Politecnico di Milano Physics
Nippon Kayaku Inc.
The Academy of Finland (FinNano program) and
Ministry of Education (JA and PM) are acknowledged for Graduate School sholarships
ESF-DYNA program and LASERLAB Europe for
supporting visits to Milano and Lund
Jani Kallioinen Pasi Myllyperkiö Viivi Lehtovuori Liisa Antila Juha Linnanto Gabor Benkö Mathias Pellnor Arkadi Yartsev Villy Sundström University of Jyväskylä Physcal Chemistry University of Lund Chemical Physics