• No results found

Using Predictive Analytics to Understand Student Loan Defaults

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Using Predictive Analytics to Understand Student Loan Defaults"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

RP Group Conference

April 8, 2016

Using Predictive Analytics to Understand

Student Loan Defaults

(2)

Ø

Background

Ø

Purpose of study

Ø

Methodology

Ø

Results

Ø

Current Approach

Ø

Future Plans

4/17/16 2

(3)

}

Student loans are the primary funding source for many

student expenses

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Tuition

Housing

Books

Food

Entertainment

Apparel

Expenses for Family

Transportation

Two-year public

Four-year private

Four-year public

(4)

}

Financial stress is highest for 2-year public college students

4/17/16 4

National Student Financial Wellness Study (2014), The Ohio State University

(5)

FY 2012 Official National Cohort Default Rates

Fiscal Year 2012 Official

# of Schools

Borrower

Default Rate

(%)

# of Borrowers

Defaulted

# of Borrowers

Entered

Repayment

Public

1,667

11.7%

301,453

2,563,157

Less than 2 yrs

148

12.2%

1,241

10,151

2-3 yrs

854

19.1%

173,628

905,058

(6)
(7)

Ø

Identify common characteristics of defaulted students and

apply a predictive statistical model to foresee student loan

defaulters in advance of their default.

Ø

Plan proactive student support strategies to reduce the

student loan default rate.

Ø

Provide a better understanding of the important connection

between financial aid functions and district-wide services to

better work as a community in this effort.

(8)

4/17/16 8

Discussion

What cross-functional problems are presented by

student loan defaulters? Why would these problems

be relevant to stakeholders beyond the financial aid

department?

(9)

}

Recognize that default is a DISTRICT-WIDE issue

}

Initiated Parker, Pierson and Associates for support

}

The district is highly interested in addressing issues

}

Ways to offer proactive support for students before they enter

default

(10)

4/17/16 10

N

=1,017

(11)

Cohort Year

2013: 21.0%

Cohort Year

2014: 14.3%

Combined

(12)

Ø

Data Collection

1,926 students, two repayment cohorts

Predictor variables

Ø

Correlations and Logistic Regression

4/17/16 12

(13)

Demographics - Ethnicity

Delta College

Cohorts

10%

17%

0%

23%

1%

43%

5%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

African-American

Asian

American Indian/Alaska Native

White Pacific Islander Hispanic Multi-Ethnicity Unknown

36%

7%

1%

25%

0%

24%

5%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

African-American

Asian

American Indian/Alaska Native

White

Pacific Islander

Hispanic

Multi-Ethnicity

(14)

4/17/16 14

Demographics - Age

Delta College

11%

41%

16%

9%

8% 10%

5% 0% 20% 23% 18% 12% 17% 10% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 17 or

Younger 18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-49 50 and over

At First Enrollment At Repayment

Cohorts

32% 34%

13%

7%

4% 6% 4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 19 or

Younger 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-49 50 and over

(15)

Demographics - Gender

Males

N

=717

37%

Females

N

=1,178

61%

Unknown

N

=31

2%

Cohorts

Male

N

=10,328

43.0%

Female

N

=13,435

56.0%

Unknown

N

=241

1.0%

(16)

Initial assessment level Most recent declared major Units attempted

Ever at any term:

• Full-time

• 15+ units

• Withdrew from a course

College Engagement Athlete, MESA, DSPS

4/17/16 16

Gender Ethnicity BOG status

Age at enrollment Veteran status

First-generation status Age at repayment

Units completed Cumulative GPA Completion:

•  Degree

•  Certificate

•  Transfer

Dismissal

Default

(17)

Population(s)

Students

Total

defaulted Default rate

Number

Default rate

Overall

point difference

Percentage

Ethnicity

Asian 134 10 7.5% 17.9% -10.4% Black or African American 691 147 21.3% 17.9% +3.4% Hispanic or Latino 465 78 16.8% 17.9% -1.1% White 481 81 16.8% 17.9% -1.0% More than one race 88 19 21.6% 17.9% +3.7%

Gender

Males 717 185 25.8% 17.9% +7.9% Females 1,178 153 13.0% 17.9% -4.9%

Special Populations

First Generation 831 165 19.9% 17.9% +2.0% Individuals with disabilities 278 53 19.1% 17.9% +1.2% Veterans 79 12 15.2% 17.9% -2.7%

All Students

1,926

344

17.9%

 

 

(18)

4/17/16 18

Population(s)

Students

Total

defaulted Default rate

Number

Default rate

Overall

point difference

Percentage

Age at First Enrollment

17 and Younger 219 22 6.4% 17.9% -11.5% 18-24 798 122 35.5% 17.9% 17.6% 25-29 304 63 18.3% 17.9% 0.4% 30-34 181 34 9.9% 17.9% -8.0% 35-39 146 26 7.6% 17.9% -10.3% 40-49 184 49 14.2% 17.9% -3.7% 50 and over 94 28 8.1% 17.9% -9.8%

Age at Repayment

18-24 381 57 16.6% 17.9% -1.3% 25-29 446 82 23.8% 17.9% 5.9% 30-34 346 64 18.6% 17.9% 0.7% 35-39 223 20 5.8% 17.9% -12.1% 40-49 336 72 20.9% 17.9% 3.0% 50 and over 194 49 14.2% 17.9% -3.7%

(19)

*List includes programs with more than 10 students in the cohort. Major Highest Default Rate Total Students in Cohort* Agriculture Technology and Sciences 53.8% 13 Physical Education 42.1% 19 Industrial Systems Technology and Maintenance 38.9% 18 Music 36.0% 25 Mass Communications 33.3% 18 Automotive Technology 32.7% 49 Art 27.8% 18 Construction Crafts Technology 26.3% 19 Information Technology 24.6% 61 Child Development/Early Care and Education 23.9% 67 Computer Programming 23.8% 21 General Studies 21.8% 78 Media and Communications 21.4% 14 Undeclared 20.4% 98 Corrections 20.0% 15

Major Lowest Default Rate Total Students in Cohort* Physical Sciences 0.0% 14 Physical Therapist Assistant 0.0% 11 Social Sciences 6.3% 32 Health Education 6.7% 15 Fashion 8.3% 12 Liberal Arts and Sciences 8.3% 24 Registered Nursing 10.4% 96 Administration of Justice 11.5% 61 Accounting 12.3% 57 Health Occupations 12.9% 280 Business and Commerce 14.1% 135 English 14.3% 14 Liberal Studies 15.4% 104 Psychology 15.6% 77 Engineering 16.7% 24

(20)

4/17/16 20

Enrollment Defaulters Defaulters Difference Non
 Avg. Units Attempted 51.8 80.6 -28.8

Avg. Units Completed 29.1 53.3 -24.3

Full-time (any semester) 77.3% 89.3% -11.9%

15+ Units (any semester) 24.7% 41.4% -16.7%

Ever Withdrew from a

Course 82.6% 86.3% -3.8%

Dismissal (Academic or

Progress) 5.2% 1.9% 3.3%

Unduplicated Count 344 1582 College Engagement/

Affinity Groups Default Rate Students Total Athletes 18.7% 75

MESA 0% 8

DSPS 19.1% 278

Unduplicated Count 344 1582

---0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

1 2 3 4 5 6

De fa ul t R ate Assessment Level

Initial Assessment

(21)

7.8%

3.2% 5.8%

12.5% 30.4%

15.4%

23.3%

30.3%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Award Certificate Degree Transfer

Completion

Default Non-Default

Defaulters

Defaulters

Non

Difference

Average Cumulative GPA

1.6

2.3

-0.7

(22)

4/17/16 22

Academic History

Correlation

Initial Math Assessment

-.09*

Initial Reading Assessment

-.09**

Initial Writing Assessment

-.10**

Level 1 Any Assessment

.12**

Units Attempted (over 60)

-.22**

Ever Full-time

-.14**

Ever 15+ units

-.13**

Demographics

Correlation

Gender (Female=1)

-.16**

Asian

-.06*

Black/ African American

.07**

Age at Enrollment

.08**

First-Gen

.05*

Outcomes

Award

-.20**

Degree

-.17**

Certificate

-.14**

Units completed

-.24**

Cumulative GPA

-.28**

GPA >2.0

-.25**

Transfer

-.15**

Completed

-.22**

Dismissed

.08**

Note: *p<.05, **p<.001;

Effect Size: <.10=small, .11-.24= medium, >.25= large

Default Default

Pr ed ic to r Variab le Pr ed ic to r Variab le

(23)

Indicator

Coefficient

Std. Error

Odds when

X is low

Odds when

X is High

Odds Ratio

Change in

Female

-0.793 *** .128

.268

.121

-10.3%

Assessment Level 1

.344 * .141

.148

.185

4.1%

Cumulative GPA >2.0

0.699 *** .161

.251

.125

-10.0%

Units Attempted >60

-.377 * .161

.202

.139

-4.6%

Did not complete

.808 *** .166

.101

.227

9.3%

Constant

-1.360

Chi-Square Log

Likelihood

216.57

Pseudo R Square

.177

(24)

4/17/16 24

are male (10.3%)

assess at level 1 in any subject (4.1%)

attempt fewer than 60 units (4.6%)

earn below a 2.0 cumulative GPA (10.0%)

(25)

Reactively we offer:

Ø

Monthly Mailers

ü

Repayment Info

ü

Deferment Forms

ü

Forbearance Forms

Ø

I-3

ü

Ion Tuition Dashboard

ü

Monthly Emails

ü

Phone Calls

Proactively we can offer:

Ø

E-Course

Ø

Loan Entrance

Counseling

Ø

Exit Counseling

Ø

Targeted Populations

Ø

Monthly Enrollment

Management

Committee Discussions

Ø

Financial Literacy

Program

(26)

4/17/16 26

Ø

Partnering with programs and faculty throughout the district

Ø

Financial Literacy Workshops

Simple Budgeting

Banking Basics

Understanding Credit History

Borrowing with Credit Cards & Loans

Financial Aid 101

Ø

Align Financial Aid Workshops with New Student Group

Advising/Orientation

Ø

Financial Literacy Website

(27)

Ø

Student success and retention are predictive of default

Ø

Future additional variables – Parental Education, High School,

Debt Burden, Educational Attainment, Family Structure

Ø

Dissemination of results to campus constituents

Ø

Utilize results to inform College action plans

(Student Equity Plan, Student Success and Support Plan, etc.)

Ø

Institutions have a shared responsibility to educate, empower,

(28)

Ø

What additional variables could contribute to student loan

default?

Ø

What are your colleges’ reactive and proactive default

prevention strategies, and how can you use this type of data

to better inform your efforts?

(29)

Tina Merlino

Research Analyst

Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness

[email protected]

Lindsay Brown

Research Analyst

Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness

[email protected]

Tina Lent

Director of Financial Aid, Scholarships & Veteran’s Services

[email protected]

San Joaquin Delta College

5151 Pacific Avenue

References

Related documents

• Assume k is a diagonal number, start index is an index of the first element of a diagonal array, and the end index is an index of last element of a diagonal array.. Therefore, it

• If you have not repaid your loan in full after you made the equivalent of 20 years (undergraduate/ 25 for graduate) of qualifying monthly payments, any outstanding balance on

Partial Cancellation Benefits 

Despite common rationales, juryless trials are implemented differently in the UK and Ireland: in England, Wales and Northern Ireland “ordinary” legislation was introduced

The first part of the article will outline briefly the key legislative provisions of asset recovery in the UK — the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) 2002 and the recent legislative

In the European Union, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the European Food Safety Authority collaborate to collect and analyse molecular typing data in

Based on several recent discoveries that have been described above, it is time for researchers to look west. Quaternary prehistoric research includes Pleistocene sites

enseñanza/aprendizaje. • Desarrollo de materiales digitales.. • Planificación y diseño de cursos apoyados en la tecnología. Todas estas nuevas posibilidades abren el horizonte