• No results found

Interim report Q1 2016

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Interim report Q1 2016"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Interim report

Q1 2016

(2)

CONTENTS

2

Introduction

Financial development

Income

Expenses

Loan impairment charge and loans in default

Deposits, loans and balance sheet

Summary and future prospects

Tables

(3)

The largest bank in the county of Sogn og Fjordane

Total assets of NOK 47,2 billion

Merchant bank oriented towards the retail- and corporate banking

market

22 sales offices in the county of Sogn og Fjordane + one sales

office in Bergen

Co-owner and distributor of products from Frende Forsikring and

SB1 Finans

Eigedomsmekling Sogn og Fjordane AS is a wholly-owned

subsidiary

267 full-time employees

Active contributor to the local communities in the county

(4)

MARKED LEADER

SSF is the largest

bank in the county

with 22 offices

and 23 “bank in

grocery stores”

The biggest

competitor is

Sparebanken Vest

with 7 branches

Three large

national banks and

four small saving

banks are located

in the county

(5)

HIGHLIGHTS 31.03.2016

Pre-tax profit of NOK 72 million (95 million)

Comprehensive income of NOK 63 million (75 million)

Net interest income of NOK 172 million (188 million)

Net gain on financial instruments of NOK -16 million (-19 million)

Operating expenses of NOK 101 million (96 million)

Impairment charge of NOK 9 million (7 million)

Annualized return equity of 7,1% (9,1%)

The whole fee payable to the Norwegian Banks` Guarantee Fund was

expenced in Q1 2016 resulting NOK 15 million in reduced net interest

income. Adjusted numbers are marked in the following slides.

(6)

The figures illustrate the comprehensive result after taxation for the Group in NOK million

FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT

76

94

56

105

75

63

74

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

(7)

FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT

62

134

76

98

95

72

87

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

(8)

CORE BUSINESS (quarterly)

The figure illustrates the result from the core business. Gain/losses from financial instruments and loan impairment charge are excluded.

115

123

135

112

122

120

132

119

97

112

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

(9)

RETURN ON EQUITY

The figure illustrates the return on equity after taxation (comprehensive income)

9,9 %

2,8 %

13,9 %

11,8 %

10,6 %

10,8 %

7,1 %

8,3 %

0,0 %

2,0 %

4,0 %

6,0 %

8,0 %

10,0 %

12,0 %

14,0 %

16,0 %

(10)

NET INTEREST INCOME

The figure illustrates the net interest income in NOK million and as a percent of average total assets.

176

175

185

189

188

183

189

193

172

187

1,

79

1,70

1,

73

1,76

1,76

1,67

1,68

1,

69

1,48

1,61

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1,00

1,10

1,20

1,30

1,40

1,50

1,60

1,70

1,80

1,90

2,00

Mill. NOK

% of avg. total assets

(11)

MARGINS OF LENDING AND DEPOSIT

The figures illustrate the average interest towards the customers less the average of 3 months NIBOR (quarterly).

2,94 2,86

3,223,34

3,14

3,423,51 3,533,43

3,32 3,32 3,19 3,23

3,023,112,99 3,04

1,75

1,921,99

2,15 2,09

2,312,42 2,44 2,41

2,25 2,20 2,21 2,23

1,94 1,97 1,87 1,76 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00

Q

1-12

Q

2-12

Q

3-12

Q

4-12

Q

1-13

Q

2-13

Q

3-13

Q

4-13

Q

1-14

Q

2-14

Q

3-14

Q

4-14

Q

1-15

Q

2-15

Q

3-15

Q

4-15

Q

1-16

Lending margins against 3 months NIBOR

CM/PS/FS

RM

0,02 -0,08 -0,25 -0,48-0,48 -0,60-0,55-0,54-0,56 -0,42-0,35-0,33 -0,31 -0,050,00 0,160,23 -0,21 -0,36-0,38 -0,62 -0,69 -0,78-0,78-0,81-0,82 -0,66 -0,54 -0,60 -0,64 -0,27-0,29 -0,15 0,00 Q 1 -1 2 Q 2 -1 2 Q 3 -1 2 Q 4 -1 2 Q 1 -1 3 Q 2 -1 3 Q 3 -1 3 Q 4 -1 3 Q 1 -1 4 Q 2 -1 4 Q 3 -1 4 Q 4 -1 4 Q 1 -1 5 Q 2 -1 5 Q 3 -1 5 Q 4 -1 5 Q 1 -1 6 -1,00 -0,50 0,00 0,50

Deposit margins against 3 months NIBOR

(12)

OTHER OPERATING INCOME (quarterly)

The figures illustrate other operating income (excl. income from financial instruments) in NOK million and as a percentage of average total assets

29

31

33

29

30

30

30

31

27

0,29 % 0,30 % 0,31 %

0,27 % 0,28 % 0,27 % 0,27 % 0,27 %

0,23 %

0,00 % 0,05 % 0,10 % 0,15 % 0,20 % 0,25 % 0,30 % 0,35 % 0,40 % 0,45 %

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

(13)

TOTAL INCOME (quarterly)

176 175 185 189 188 183 189 193 172 187

29 31 33 29 30 30 30

31

27

27

-10

60

-19

8 5

-56

-16 -16 195

214

278

223 199 221 224 168

183

198

-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

(14)

OPERATING EXPENSES AS A % OF INCOME

56,3 %

38,6 %

47,8 %

44,2 %

48,3 %

55,6 %

51,4 %

0,0 %

10,0 %

20,0 %

30,0 %

40,0 %

50,0 %

60,0 %

70,0 %

80,0 %

(15)

OPERATING EXPENSES AS A % OF INCOME

(excl. income from financial instr.)

54,6 %

50,5 %

50,1 %

44,2 %

44,0 %

51,1 %

47,6 %

0,0 %

10,0 %

20,0 %

30,0 %

40,0 %

50,0 %

60,0 %

(16)

OPERATING EXPENSES (quarterly)

The figure illustrates the operating expenses as a percentage of average total assets

91

84

83

106

96

93

87

105

101

0,91 %

0,81 % 0,79 %

1,00 %

0,89 %

0,85 %

0,78 %

0,93 %

0,87 %

0,00 % 0,20 % 0,40 % 0,60 % 0,80 % 1,00 %

1,20 %

1,40 %

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

(17)

LOAN IMPAIRMENT CHARGE

The figures illustrate the development of impairment charge of loans and guarantees in NOK million

8

6

20

7

7

9

0

5

10

15

20

25

(18)

LOAN IMPAIRMENT CHARGE

The figures illustrates the development in impairment charge of loans and guaranties as a percentage of gross loans.

0,03 %

0,02 %

0,06 %

0,02 %

0,02 %

0,02 %

0,00 %

0,01 %

0,02 %

0,03 %

0,04 %

0,05 %

0,06 %

0,07 %

(19)

LOANS IN DEFAULT

The figure illustrates the quarterly development of loans in default (more than 90 days) as a percentage of gross loans to the respective sectors (RM and CM/PS/FS)

0,23 %0,28 %0,25 %0,19 %0,23 %0,28 %0,24 %0,24 %0,17 %0,19 %0,19 %0,18 %0,16 % 3,14%

3,05% 3,11%

2,90%

3,19%

2,78%

2,96% 2,94%

3,10%

0,81%

2,31%

3,08%

2,14%

1,14 %1,14 %1,11 %

1,02 %1,12 %1,03 %1,04 %1,03 %1,02 %

0,37 %

0,79 %

1,01 %

0,73 %

0,00 %

0,50 %

1,00 %

1,50 %

2,00 %

2,50 %

3,00 %

3,50 %

(20)

TOTAL ASSETS

The figure illustrate the development of total assets in NOK billion

35,2

37,1

39,6

42,6

45,9

47,2

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0

40,0

45,0

50,0

(21)

LOANS - DEPOSITS

The figure illustrates the 12 months development of gross loans and deposits in NOK billion

30,5

32,7

34,8

37,5

40,2

40,8

17,8

19,0

20,6

22,4

23,0

23,4

58,23 %

58,29 %

59,19 %

59,87 %

57,24 %

57,25 %

50,00 % 52,00 % 54,00 % 56,00 % 58,00 % 60,00 % 62,00 % 64,00 %

0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q1.16

(22)

LOANS - DEPOSITS (growth)

The figure illustrates the yearly growth. The percentage for the quarter is the growth for the past12 months.

5,

8

%

6,

9

%

6,

6

%

7,

6

%

7,

1

%

1,

6

%

6,

2

%

7,

0

%

8,

3

%

8,

9

%

2,

4

%

1,

7

%

0,0 % 1,0 % 2,0 % 3,0 % 4,0 % 5,0 % 6,0 % 7,0 % 8,0 % 9,0 % 10,0 %

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q1.16

(23)

LOANS TO CUSTOMERS

The figure illustrates the mixture and development of gross loans to the respective sectors (RM and CM/PS/FS)

3

5

,3

2

4

,9

1

0

,4

3

8

,1

2

7

,3

1

0

,8

4

0

,8

2

9

,6

1

1

,2

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0

40,0

45,0

Gross loans

RM

CM/PS/FS

At Q1.2014

At Q1.2015

At Q1.2016

(24)

LOANS BY SECTOR

68,5 %

70,3 %

71,6 %

72,6 %

72,5 %

31,5 %

29,7 %

28,4 %

27,4 %

27,5 %

0 %

10 %

20 %

30 %

40 %

50 %

60 %

70 %

80 %

90 %

100 %

2012

2013

2014

2015

Q1.16

(25)

DEPOSITS FROM CUSTOMERS

The figure illustrates the mixture and development of deposits from the respective sectors (RM and CM/PS/FS)

2

1

,0

1

2

,4

8

,6

2

2

,6

1

3

,5

9

,1

2

3

,4

1

4

,7

8

,7

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

Total deposits

RM

CM/PS/FS

(26)

GROSS LOANS - FUNDING

The figure illustrate how gross loans are funded

58,2 %

58,3 %

59,2 %

59,9 %

57,2 %

57,3 %

8,2 %

15,6 %

18,7 %

21,1 %

23,0 %

23,5 %

33,5 %

26,1 %

22,1 %

19,0 %

19,8 %

19,2 %

0 %

10 %

20 %

30 %

40 %

50 %

60 %

70 %

80 %

90 %

100 %

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Q1.16

(27)

CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO

11,2 %

12,2 %

12,4 %

13,2 %

13,7 %

13,5 %

1,4 %

0,0 %

0,0 %

0,0 %

1,0 %

0,6 %

2,2 %

2,0 %

2,0 %

13,8 %

14,6 %

14,4 %

15,5 %

15,7 %

15,4 %

0,0 %

2,0 %

4,0 %

6,0 %

8,0 %

10,0 %

12,0 %

14,0 %

16,0 %

18,0 %

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

At Q1 16

(28)

The figure illustrates the maturity structure for the different sources of funding (NOK million)

(29)

LIQUIDITY BUFFER

(30)

SUMMARY AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

Comprehensive income at Q1 2016, adjusted for the change in the accounting

treatment of the fee to the Norwegian Banks` Guarantee Fund, was at the same

level as Ql 2015

Moderate loan impairment charge

Core business according to expectations

Deposits and loans to customers rose solidly, primarily from RM

Somewhat lower deposits/ gross lending ratio

Operating expenses rose more than in past years due to planned

heavy investment in new IT systems.

Operating expense ratio of 51,1%- adjusted for the Fee: 47,6%

Return on equity 7,1% annualised- adjusted for the Fee: 8,3%

Capital adequacy ratio 15,4%

Satisfactory capital adequacy ratio, solid growth, stable customer margins, low

costs and a strong market position

(31)

KEY FIGURES – PROFIT AND LOSS

INCOME STATEMENT

31/03/2016

31/03/2015

31/12/2015

Net interest income *)

172

188

754

Dividends and gains/losses on financial instruments

-16

-19

-62

Other operating income

27

30

121

Operating expenses

101

96

382

Profit/loss before loan impairment charge (incl. securities)

81

103

430

Profit/loss before loan impairment charge (excl. securities)

97

122

493

Loan impairment charge

9

7

99

Profit/loss before taxation

72

95

331

Taxation

23

28

87

Profit/loss after taxation

49

68

245

Other comprehensive income

15

7

107

Comprehensive income

63

75

352

(32)

KEY FIGURES – BALANCE

31/03/2016

31/03/2015

31/12/2015

Assets

Gross loans and advances to customers

40,808

38,108

40,154

Impairment provisions

289

163

289

Security investments (shares, commercial paper and bonds)

5,561

4,443

5,467

Debt and equity

Deposits from and debt to customers

23,365

22,632

22,984

Debt securities and debt to credit institutions

19,149

16,249

18,179

Equity

3,574

3,331

3,571

Total assets

47,200

43,524

45,936

(33)

KEY FIGURES

Profitability

Net interest income as a % of average total assets (1) 1.48% 1.76% 1.70%

Dividends and gains/losses on financial instruments -0.14% -0.18% -0.14%

Other operating income (excl. inc. from fin. instr.) as a % of average total assets 0.23% 0.28% 0.27%

Operating expenses as a % of average total assets 0.87% 0.89% 0.86%

Profit/loss before impairment charge as a % of average total assets 0.69% 0.95% 0.97%

Profit/loss before tax as a % of average total assets 0.62% 0.88% 0.75%

Comprehensive income as a % of average total assets 0.54% 0.69% 0.79%

Oper. exp. as a % of oper. income excl. inc. from fin. instr. 51.10% 44.01% 43.66%

Oper. exp. as a % of oper. income incl. inc. from fin. instr. 55.62% 48.33% 47.00%

Impairment charge as a % of gross loans 0.02% 0.02% 0.25%

Return on equity before tax 8.07% 11.64% 10.13%

Return on equity (comprehensive income) 7.09% 9.13% 10.77%

Financial strength

Capital adequacy ratio 15.42% 15.65% 15.71%

Core capital adequacy ratio 13.47% 13.53% 13.73%

Core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio 13.47% 13.53% 13.73%

Equity ratio 7.57% 7.65% 7.77%

Balance sheet history

Growth in total assets (year-on-year) 8.45% 7.58% 7.81%

Growth in gross customer lending (year-on-year) 7.09% 8.07% 7.12%

Growth in customer deposits (year-on-year) 3.24% 7.72% 2.41%

Deposits as a % of consolidated gross lending 57.25% 59.39% 57.24%

Deposits as a % of parent company’s gross lending 81.17% 80.27% 81.75%

Employees

Full-time equivalent administrative staff 265 266 271

Full-time equivalent cleaning, canteen staff, etc. 2 3 2

31/03/2016 31/03/2015 31/12/2015

The whole fee payable to the Norwegian Banks’ Guarantee Fund was expensed in Q1 2016, whereas previously it was expensed over the course of the whole year. This reduced the net interest margin in Q1 2016 by NOK 15 million, or 0.13 percentage points, in comparison with the past accounting practice.

(34)

CORE BUSINESS

Excl. dividends and changes in values of financial instruments

CORE BUSINESS BEFORE AND AFTER IMPAIRMENT CHARGE

Adjusted

MNOK

Q2.14 Q3.14 Q4.14 Q1.15 Q2.15 Q3.15 Q4.15

Q1.16

Q1.16

Net interest income

175 185 189 188 183 189 193

172

187

Net commision income

22

23

22

23

20

22

21

20

20

Other income

9

10

7

7

10

8

9

7

7

Operating expenses

84

83 106

96

93

87 105

101

101

Basic operations before imp. charge 122 135 112 122 120 132 119

97

112

Loan impairment charge

8

9

50

7

5

87

0

9

9

References

Related documents

The general objective of this study is to determine the relationship between socio-demographic and other related factors with depressive, anxiety and

Of course, as you know, the rise of credit rating agencies as financial gatekeepers began when the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1975 in what probably seemed like a

Our longitudinal study did not show any measurable differences between groups of alcohol users with respect to maturation of executive functioning, contrary to the hypothesis that

Rezultate primjene konfuzije jabu č noga savija č a na manjim površinama, bez dovoljne prostorne izolacije od travnja č kih nasada ili mješovitih vo ć njaka uz oku ć nice

If the roll is equal to or higher then the model's shooting skill then it hits and wounds as described in close combat.. If the roll was lower then the model's shooting skill then

HC-PAA is also shown to provide improved performance compared to APCA (an improved and commonly used method) by demonstrating greater cluster separation measures and

To sum up the empirical section, we have investigated the extent to which specific skills (as opposed to general skills) in the labor market represent an obstacle to the reallocation

(2010) Effect of Fly Ash Content on Friction and Dry Sliding Wear Behaviour of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites - A Taguchi Approach. P HKTRSR and