• No results found

Intermodal Transportation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Intermodal Transportation"

Copied!
63
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Intermodal Transportation

Teodor Gabriel Crainic

ESG UQAM &

(2)

Plan

à What are we talking about?

à Container-based intermodal transportation à System design (location)

à Fleet Management (empties) à Perspectives

(3)
(4)

Intermodal Transportation

à Simple and straightforward definition:

à Movement of a person or a load by a sequence of at least

two transportation modes, the transfer from one mode to the next being performed at a (intermodal) terminal

à E.g., Door-to-door transportation of containers ÓOver long distances

ÓOrigin → “land” transport → port → container ship

(5)

A “Strict” Definition

à Movement of goods

à One and the same loading unit or vehicle à A chain of

à Several transportation modes (services) ÓCoordination

ÓInteractions

à Intermodal terminals

ÓNo handling of the goods themselves à Door-to-door service

(6)

A More General Definition

à Movement of goods à A chain (network)

à Several transportation modes (services) ÓCoordination (more or less)

ÓInteractions

à Intermodal terminals à “Door-to-door” service

(7)

Many Things to Many People

à Major instrument for E.U. policy aimed at switching

freight from trucks & highways to more environment-friendly modes (rail, water)

à Dedicated rail services (subdivisions) to move large

volumes of containers/trailers over long distances: the trans-continental “land bridges”

à Container transportation

à Consolidation carriers: local & long-haul operations,

several long-haul types of services, with/without use of external services

(8)

Many Things to Many People

(2) à Uncontainerized cargo

à Courier (express) services à National planning

à City Logistics

(9)

Scope of Presentation

à Container-based intermodal transportation

ÓIllustrative planning/operations management issues

ÓOperations research models and methods

à A very young field à No definite answers

(10)

Plan

à What are we talking about?

à Container-based intermodal transportation

à System design (location)

à Fleet Management (empties) à Perspectives

(11)

Intermodal Transportation – Containers

à Advantages

ÓReduced cargo handling

ÓIncreased security regarding damage and loss ÓIncreased standardization of transportation and

transfer equipment

ÓIncreased automation of terminal operations ⇒Cost reduction, more efficient door-to-door

transportation

(12)

Evolution of Container Traffic

(Koh and Kim 2001) 5.8 254.6 2003 Growth rate (%) Container traffic (M) Year 3.9 240.6 2002 2.8 231.6 2001 10.9 225.3 2000 10.0 203.2 1999 4.2 153.5 1997 9.8 137.2 1995 12.5 113.2 1993

(13)

Intermodal Transportation – Containers

(2) à Lifeline of world-wide trade and economy

à Increasingly larger container ships for inter-continental

transportation (liners)

ÓThese cannot berth at all ports

ÓIt is not economical to stop at many ports à Container mega ports

à New coastal navigation feeder services (“regular” ships):

mega ports and huge liners ↔ regular ports

⇒A new link in the multi-modal chain

(14)

Intermodal Transportation – Containers

(3)

Þ Asia (Hong Kong, Singapore, …) to America or Europe: à Origin → truck → port → large container ship (liner)

→ mega port → “small” container vessel → port → truck/rail/river → destination

à Container port terminal transformations for increased

efficiency in loading/unloading operations and exchanges with land carriers

ÓNew terminals / Enhancement of existing ones ÓAutomation

(15)

Notes

à Container intermodal transportation

(& express courier / post services)

ÓCustomer: Customized service

ÓOperator(s): Hub-and-spoke network with

consolidation

à All long-haul transportation must address the issue of

empty vehicle repositioning

ÓTrade is unbalanced

⇒Vehicle flows as well !!

(16)

Plan

à What are we talking about?

à Container-based intermodal transportation

à System design (location)

à Fleet Management (empties) à Perspectives

(17)

System and Service Design

à Strategic decisions – System Design à Locate (intermodal) terminals

à Direct/indirect customer (zone) service à Port/terminal dimensioning

ÓNumber of berths

ÓSize of storage space

ÓType & number of various equipment types à Facility & service abandon, …

(18)

System and Service Design

(2) à Tactical decisions – Service Design

ÓRoutes served (routes, stops, mode, equipment, …) ÓService frequency & schedule

ÓCargo routing

ÓTerminal workloads

à Container port terminal equipment assignment ÓTo sea-side and land-side operations

(19)

System Design

à Not many contributions

ÓTactical or operational models to evaluate strategic

strategies

ÓPorts: queuing, simulation à Discrete location models

ÓConsolidation / hub terminals à Network design + location

ÓSelect direct services/links

à Aim to capture economies of scale associated to

(20)

System Design

(2)

à Location of facilities (terminals) ÓProduction-distribution

ÓHub location

(21)

Location with Balancing Requirements

à Land part of an intermodal container transportation

system (may be generalized)

à Use in-land container depots for more efficient

(22)

“Traditional” Operations

Importing customer Exporting Loaded Empty

(23)

Operations with In-Land Depots

Importing customer Exporting customer Loaded Empty Empty balancing

(24)

Location with Balancing Requirements

(2) à Loaded movements are “profitable”

à Empty movements are not

ÓCustomer to depot: Return movement

ISupply of empties

ÓDepot to customer: Demand satisfaction

IDemand for empties

ÓDepot to depot: Repositioning of empty containers

(25)

Location with Balancing Requirements Network

customers customers depots demand supply

k

Dip Oip

O

i

s

jkp

c

ijp

i

j

i'

(26)

customers customers depots supply

k

ijp

x

jkp

w

O

i

i

j

i'

j

y

' ki p

x

(27)

Location with Balancing Formulation

Minimise

Subject to

[Demand / Flow conservation] Z f y c x c x s w x O i C p P x D i C p P j j D j

ijp ijp jip jip jkp jkp

k D j D j D i C p P ijp ip j D jip ip j D = + + + = ∈ ∈ = ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈

{ ( ) } , ,

(28)

Location with Balancing Formulation

(2) , , [Linking / Feasibility] [Balancing] , 0 , x O y i C j D p P x D y i C j D p P x w x w j D p P x x i C j D p P w j D k D p P y ijp ip j jip ip j ijp i C kjp k D jip i C jkp k D ijp jip jkp ≤ ∈ ∈ ∈ ≤ ∈ ∈ ∈ + − − = ∈ ∈ ≥ ∈ ∈ ∈ ≥ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈ ∈

, , , , , , 0 0 ∈{ , }0 1 j D

(29)

Plan

à What are we talking about?

à Brief overview of freight transportation à Container-based intermodal transportation à System design (location)

à Fleet Management (empties)

(30)

Operational Planning

à Resource management ÓCrews

ÓVehicles

ÓPower (engines, etc.), and so on à Allocation – dispatching, schedules

ÓMake sure the required resources are where they

need to be when they need to be there

ÓBe efficient !

(31)

Issues

à Trade is unbalanced

à Moving goods results in unbalanced distribution of

resources: crews, vehicles, etc.

à One needs to reposition resources for use in the

following periods

ÓRegular operations (if possible)

ÓBalancing operations (vehicles, power units, …) ÓCrews travelling as passengers

(32)

Other Operational Issues

à Real-time dispatch à Pacing

à Real-time routing adjustment à …

(33)

Consolidation Transportation

à Transportation plan “guides” operations

à It includes guidelines for repositioning (it should …) à “Indicative” schedules: Ad-hoc (real-time) procedures à “Regular” demand planning: Short-term and real-time

adjustment of plans

à Scheduled operations: Repositioning must follow and

“feed” schedules + real-time adjustment

(34)

Customized Transportation

à No plan !!

à Dynamic management and control of resources: routes,

schedules, fleets, personnel, etc.

à Uncertainty plays important role ÓDemand

ÓTravel times

ÓService times at customers and terminals ÓWeather, …

(35)

The Empty Vehicle Repositioning Problem

à Surpluses and deficits of empty vehicles

ÓObserved at terminals “at the end” of the day

ÓComputed with respect to the next period demand

à Need to reposition for the next period

ÓHow many vehicles (of what type) to move from a

surplus location (origin) to a deficit location

(destination)?

à Much more decision freedom than in loaded

transportation

(36)

History

à Transportation model – static and deterministic

ÓKnown surpluses and deficits – No uncertainties ÓNo (not important) travel time impact – Static ÓArrival times known (certain prediction)

IAll travel, loaded and empty, occurs during the same period

ÓSingle or fully substituable resources (vehicles) ÓFor certain LTL types, tactical planning, …

(37)

History

(2)

à Deterministic, multi-period transshipment model

ÓDifferent movements require different travel times ÓVehicles become empty at different moments

(customer release times)

ÓDemand varies in time …

ÓThe dynamic characteristic of the system represented

through (dynamic, time-dependent) space-time

(38)

Space-Time Networks

à Nodes: Facilities – terminals, customers, etc. – at given

time periods

ÓA physical point is repeated at each period & activity

à Arcs: Movements in space and time

ÓIndependent, e.g., a truck moving by itself

ÓGrouped, e.g., containers on flat cars (rail) or in a

ship

(39)

Space-Time Network (Simple)

Terminals

Time

(40)

Space-Time Network

Terminals

(41)

Challenges and Limitations

à One may include ÓCapacities

ÓSeveral types of resources ÓInventory costs

IStock out (rent, borrow, …) IEnd of horizon value

ÓSubstitutions (and costs) ÓComplex cost structures

à Linear programming formulations with a few

(42)

Challenges and Limitations

(2)

à Planning horizon length? End-of-horizon? ÓRolling horizon

à Everything is deterministic

ÓTimes (travel, terminal operations, customer, …) ÓFuture demand, etc.

à Utilization

(43)

The Uncertainty Factor

à Times may vary

à Demand estimation is rarely precise à Unexpected demands and events

à Current decisions impact the future state of the system

and future decisions

à Need to explicitly consider / model

ÓUncertainty – the stochastic nature – of the system

and its environment

ÓThe impact of current decisions on future system state

(44)

The Uncertainty Factor

(2)

à Stochastic formulations and solution methods

à A complex field: General approaches and, often,

custom-designed methods

à Active research field à Formulations

ÓGeneral stochastic programming and solution

methods :

(45)

The Uncertainty Factor

(3)

à Formulations

ÓRecourse formulations and rolling horizon methods

INice application to regular-type systems (e.g., consolidation)

ÓStochastic formulation and solution strategies based

on adaptive dynamic (linear) programming and decision/time-based decomposition

ITime-Space multicommodity networks

(46)

The Uncertainty Factor

(4)

à Challenges of stochastic formulations ÓProblem formulation (!!)

ÓResolution (!!) à Plus

ÓRepresentation of resources and attributes ÓForecasts

ÓAvailability and reliability of data ÓValidation of models and strategies

(47)

Container (Empty) Fleet Management

à Major repositioning decisions over large geographical

regions (e.g., inter-continental movements)

ÓSimilar to consolidation transportation à Allocation of empty containers to customers

ÓSimilar to customized transportation à Two applications in this talk

ÓAllocation and management of a heterogeneous fleet

of containers over a land zone

ÓSingle-commodity dynamic container allocation for

(48)

Heterogeneous Fleet

à Given region (continent)

à Loaded containers arrive (e.g., maritime network) to be

delivered to customers

à Empty containers arrive or leave to balance system-wide

operations (demand)

à Customers empty containers that must be moved out à Customers require empty containers for future loaded

shipments

(49)

Heterogeneous Fleet

(2)

à Several types of containers (e.g., 20 or 40 feet, normal

box, thermal, refrigerated, etc.)

à Substitutions allowed: conditions and costs à “Massive” inter-depot balancing movements

à Due-dates at some terminals (e.g., ship schedules) à Time windows at customers

à Demand (at least part of) fluctuates in time and is

forecasted only

à Unloading time at customer: Uncertain

(50)

Heterogeneous Fleet

(3)

à Containers may be damaged partially (repairs) or totally à External sources (buy, rent) of empty containers

à Centralized empty container fleet management à Loaded movements not “managed”

à Associated problem: global management of the empty &

loaded container movements together with vehicle routes

à A single model not computationally feasible ⇒

(51)

Main Movements

(No Time/Container Type Specifics)

Harbour Depot j Depot k Supply customer Demand customer External pool of empty containers

(52)

Formulations

à Crainic, Dejax, Gendreau (93)

à Single and multicommodity deterministic formulations à A two-stage, restricted recourse single commodity,

stochastic model

(53)

Formulations

(2)

à Space-time diagram

ÓGeneralized network (substitutions) ÓMultiple-period transportation arcs ÓHolding arcs (depots)

ÓInter-depot balancing arcs à Stochastic elements

ÓDemand (of known and possible customers) ÓRelease time from supply customers

⇒Inventory levels

(54)

Formulations

(3)

à Minimize total cost over the time horizon

à Flow conservation (over time and space, including

access to external pool)

ÓSupply at supply customers ÓDemand

ÓContainer substitution

à Depot (and port) inventories (each container type) à Bounds on inter-depot balancing flows

(55)

Single Commodity Liner

à Cheung and Chen 1998

à A container liner company offers regular service among

a number of ports

à Carries loaded and, space permitting, empty containers à Ship schedules known and fixed

à 1 ship / period between 2 ports à Demand less than ship capacity à 1 container type

(56)

Formulation

à Two-stage stochastic model

ÓTime-space network with random arc capacities ÓMinimize the (expected) total cost

ÓRolling-horizon mode à Sources of randomness

ÓShip residual capacity for taking empty containers

(given port and time period)

ÓDemand for containers at each port/time

(57)

Formulation

(2)

à Minimize total expected (cost – revenue from demand) à Ship container conservation: containers unloaded

à Ship container conservation: containers loaded for

repositioning

à Port container conservation / demand satisfaction à Ship residual capacity for repositioning

(58)

Plan

à What are we talking about?

à Brief overview of freight transportation à Container-based intermodal transportation à System design (location)

à Fleet Management (empties)

(59)

Perspectives

à Intermodal transportation

ÓGrowing steadily & should continue to grow ÓContainers and other modes

à Profound modifications to the economic, regulatory,

technological, social and political environment of industry

à Globalization, automation, ITS, e-logistics, security, … à Need for innovative and enhanced planning and

management procedures

à Opportunities for Operations Research and

(60)

Perspectives

(2)

à A number of research efforts and important results

à Much more work is needed!

à Many issues application areas not/little addressed à Industry evolution ⇒ New problems

à Ports & terminals

ÓPlanning (all levels)

ÓIntegration of operations & equipment types ÓAutomation

(61)

Perspectives

(3)

à Carrier strategic & tactical planning ÓMore studied than terminals, but

ÓBetter representation/integration of “local” operations

and characteristics

ÓIntegration of employee scheduling impacts/relations ÓBetter representation of time dependencies

ÓBetter integration of stochastic aspects into long-term

planning models

(62)

Perspectives

(4)

à Short-term planning

ÓTime-dependent, stochastic formulations and

algorithms

ÓIntegrated models, e.g.,

IContainer fleet management over land and sea IVehicles, power, crews, …

à Modelling of ITS and e-logistics and integration to

planning and management models; e.g.,

ÓFlow of information

(63)

Perspectives

(5)

à Modelling the impact of security measures and

addressing the new issues

à Logistic networks

ÓCoordination & synchronization

ÓInformation flows and uncertainties à Methodology

ÓModels

ÓMethods exact and (meta) heuristic ÓParallel computation

References

Related documents

This was the overarching political strategy which defined the media contest between Iran, the media authority, and Iraq, the media challenger, and initiated

Imbalance of usable bikes in the system can be addressed by maintaining an (sub-)optimal quantity of bikes in each station in case of station-based systems or each zone in case

American pool table top rail is possible, home depot distribution centers in such that normal stroke and costs more?. The pool tables so, an instance of pool table costs more

It has come to the conclusion that on the employees engagement affects their sense of belonging to the company, evaluation of their efforts, clear guidelines within which the

Craftsman professional customer service calls, replacement appliances for a home warranty policy that protects your.. Is law Depot owned

DELIVER TO TRANSPORT DEPOT MINIMUM ORDER OF 6 CARTONS $10 DELIVERY CHARGE.. ORDERS UNDER MINIMUM - $25 DELIVERY FEE WILL BE CHARGED CUSTOMER TO PAY FREIGHT

The modern benefits that result from the introduction of the latest technological advances in the management process in the state are certainly associated with

Recommended Policy: Target an annual rate funded system investment amount that is sufficient to fund repair and replacement capital programs with same-year rate revenues