• No results found

Buy full version here - for $ 7.00

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Buy full version here - for $ 7.00"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

This is a

Sample

version of the

.

watermark.

‘sample’

without

comes

CQ

I

the

of

version

full

The

The full complete

2

4

page

version includes –

ICQ

Overview

information

ICQ-LF

&

ICQ-SF

Scoring/

Administration instructions

nhaled

I

questionnaire.

item

15

(ICQ-SF)

Form

Short

Questionnaire

Corticosteroid

- Inhaled

questionnaire.

item

57

Form

(ICQ-LF

)

Long

uestionnaire

Q

orticosteroid

C

ICQ

Clinical

Validity

Buy full version

here

- for

$ .00

7

Clicking the above buy now button will take you to the PayPal

payment service website in which you can pay via credit card or your optional PayPal account.

Once you have paid for your item you will receive a direct link to download your full complete e-book instantly. You will also receive an email with a link to download your e-book. Each purchased product you order is available to

download for 24 hours from time of purchase. Should

[email protected]

-contact please

enquiries

or youhaveanyproblems

Toseemoreassessmentstestsandscalesgoto-www.agedcaretests.com

Inhaled

(ICQ)

(2)

Page 1 of 15

(page number not for citation purposes)

A self-rating scale for patient-perceived side effects of inhaled

corticosteroids

Juliet M Foster*

1,2

, Eric van Sonderen

3

, Amanda J Lee

1

, Robbert Sanderman

3

,

Antoon Dijkstra

4

, Dirkje S Postma

4

and Thys van der Molen

1,2

Address: 1Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, UK, 2Department of General Practice, University Medical

Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 3Northern Center for Healthcare Research, University Medical Center Groningen,

University of Groningen, The Netherlands and 4Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of

Groningen, The Netherlands

Email: Juliet M Foster* - [email protected]; Eric van Sonderen - [email protected]; Amanda J Lee - [email protected]; Robbert Sanderman - [email protected]; Antoon Dijkstra - [email protected]; Dirkje S Postma - [email protected]; Thys van der Molen - [email protected]

* Corresponding author

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported side effect questionnaires offer a simple method for the systematic

measurement of drug-related side effects. In order to measure patients' inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) related side effect perceptions the 14-day retrospective Inhaled Corticosteroid Questionnaire (ICQ) was developed. In this research we aim to assess the construct validity and reliability of the ICQ and test its responsiveness to dose changes in adult asthma patients.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, current inhaler users with asthma completed the ICQ (27 with non

ICS inhaler; 61 BDP equivalent daily ICS low dose ≤400 µg; 62 mid dose 401–800 µg; and 105 with high dose >800 µg). We generated 3 construct validity hypotheses: 1) a hierarchical dose-response pattern for scoring of the individual items on the ICQ, and statistically significant differences in the scores of each of the 15 ICQ domains by ICS dose group 2) an association between ICS dose and ICQ scoring after adjusting for appropriate confounders in multiple regression; 3) greater convergence between local side effect domains than between systemic and local domains of the scale. Test-retest reliability was assessed on a randomly selected subgroup of patients (n = 73) who also completed the ICQ a second time after 7 days. In a separate longitudinal study, 61 patients with asthma completed the ICQ at baseline and after changing their daily ICS dose, at 2- and 6- months, in order to test the ICQ's responsiveness.

Results: All three construct validity hypotheses were well supported: 1) a statistically significant difference

existed in scores for 14 domains, the high ICS dose group scoring highest; 2) ICS dose independently predicted ICQ scoring after adjusting for confounders; 3) greater convergence existed between local ICQ domains than between local and systemic domains. The ICQ had good reproducibility: test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients were ≥0.69 for all but the 'Facial Oedema' domain. In the longitudinal study, ICQ scores for 'Voice Problems' changed significantly at 2- and 6-months from baseline and other ICQ domains displayed trends in scoring change accordant with dose modulation at 6-months.

Conclusion: The ICQ has good dose-related discriminative properties, is valid, reliable, and shows

potential responsiveness to ICS dose change.

Published: 24 October 2006

Respiratory Research 2006, 7:131 doi:10.1186/1465-9921-7-131

Received: 20 July 2006 Accepted: 24 October 2006

This

version. complete

(3)

Inhaled Corticos This

te

roid

sion.

r

ve

complete

chase

r

pu

to

1

page

to

n

r

etu

r

Please

ity.

d

vali

clinical

ICQ

Sample

the

of

d

en

the

is

Questionnaire (ICQ)

Scoring & administration

The Inhaled Corticosteroid Questionnaire (ICQ) comes in two forms ie. a 57 item questionnaire long form and a 15 item short form. This ICQ is a useful tool for measuring patients' perceptions of ICS associated side effects. The ICQ shows good reliability and validity in asthma patients and has good discriminative properties. Used for systematic measurement, this simple questionnaire may provide a greater understanding of the side effect perceptions of patients in clinical practice and clinical trials, and will yield useful new perspectives on the relationship between perceived side effect of ICS and adherence.

The ICQ covers a range of patient-perceived side effects including voice, throat, skin and mood problems. The ICQ was scored on an item level from 0 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal) other response options being: 1 (a very little), 2 (a little), 3 (a moderate amount), 4 (quite alot), 5 (a great deal). In order that domain scores with differing numbers of items could be compared, the 15 domain scores were transformed into a score out of 100 The total score of the ICQ (0–100) is the average of the 15 domain scores (sum the scores of 15

domains/15). The highest score represents the greatest side effect.

To calculate a score for a subscale: Add up all the respondents’ answers for each of the questions listed for that subscale (this is the raw score) place it in the subscale equation –

(4)

Inhaled Corticosteroid Questionnaire - Long Form (ICQ-LF) Scoring Table -

Subscales

Question Numbers

Subscale Score Range

Voice Problems (VP) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 21, 22,

23, 24

90 = 100%

% = (𝑉𝑃 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

90 ) × 100

Oropharynx Problems (OP) 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 54 = 100%

% = (𝑂𝑃 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

54 ) × 100

Unpleasant Taste (UT) 28, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39 42 = 100%

% = (𝑈𝑇 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

42 ) × 100

Skin Hair and Nails (SHN) 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 49, 50 42 = 100%

% = (𝑆𝐻𝑁 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

(5)

Inhaled Corticosteroid Questionnaire - Short Form (ICQ-SF) Scoring Table -

Subscales

Question Numbers

Subscale Score Range

Voice Problems (VP) 1, 6 = 100%

% = (𝑉𝑃 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

6 ) × 100

Oropharynx Problems (OP) 2 6 = 100%

% = (𝑂𝑃 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

6 ) × 100

Unpleasant Taste (UT) 5 6 = 100%

% = (𝑈𝑇 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

6 ) × 100

Skin Hair and Nails (SHN) 9 6 = 100%

% = (𝑆𝐻𝑁 𝑟𝑎𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 6 ) × 100

This

sion.

r

ve

complete

chase

r

pu

to

1

page

to

n

r

etu

r

Please

.

instructions

scoring

ICQ

Sample

the

of

d

en

the

is

(6)

Inhaled Corticosteroid

Questionnaire (ICQ-LF)

(ORIGINAL UK ENGLISH VERSION - SEPTEMBER 15, 2003)

©

Patient

Name:__________________________________________________________

Date:___________________________________________________________

(7)

How much have you been affected by the following side-effects related to the use of your inhaler/s during the last 14 days?

(Please circle one number on each line)

Not at all A very

little A little A moderate amount Quite a lot A great deal A very great deal

1. Hoarseness of the voice? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

2. A ‘rough’ voice? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

3. A noticeable change to your voice? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

4. Your voice feeling similar to how your voice feels when recovering from the flu?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Your voice feeling like it had ‘gone to

the back of your throat’? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

6. Not being able to sing? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

7. Loss of speech volume so that you

couldn’t talk as loudly as normal? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

8. A feeling of exhaustion when talking? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

9. A painful throat when talking? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

10. A feeling that other people couldn’t understand your speechbecause you speak too softly or not clearly enough?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

This

version.

complete

purchase

.

Please

return

to

page

1

to

(8)

Inhaled Corticosteroid

Questionnaire

(ICQ-SF)

(ORIGINAL UK ENGLISH VERSION - SEPTEMBER 15, 2003)

Patient ID

Name:________________________________________________________________________ ___ Date:_________________________________________________________________________ __

(9)

During the last 2 weeks how much have you been affected by the following side-effects of your regularly inhaled medication?

(Please circle one number on each line) Not at all A very little A little A moderate amount Quite a lot A great deal A very great deal 1. Hoarseness of the voice?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

2. A need to clear your throat ? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

3. An itchy feeling in the back of

your throat. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

4. Oral thrush (sore throat covered with

pustules, and difficulty swallowing)?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

This

version.

complete

purchase

Please

return

to

page

1

to

References

Related documents

Accordingly, with the help of global standarts that are formed by International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) related to insurance sector public auditing; we aim

However, there are still many shortcomings in our waterway transport such as: There is still a situation where the water transport routes are not uniform; the

Time- course of the changes in mean systemic arterial pressure (MSAP), heart rate (HR) and total power density of vasomotor components (0 – 0.8 Hz) of systemic arterial pressure

ACHAP, Africa Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Partnership; BINAPS, Botswana National HIV/AIDS Prevention Support Project; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DHMT, District

In conclusion, breeding for resistance to scrapie can be implemented in goats, even though the initial condi- tions of some breeds may not be particularly favourable and the rate

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the close association between blood eosinophils and lung function trajectories in subjects with no

Because of the previously described high catheterization usage rate coupled with a subsequent small rate of culture positivity, our overall aim was to reduce urethral

After we adjusted for gender, race, insurance type, year of cohort entry (secular trend), study site, annual visit rate, and baseline SBP percentile, there was no