• No results found

HuiLec001.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "HuiLec001.pdf"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Hyoung-Goo Kang

Abstract

Students will understand preliminary denitions and concepts.

1. Martingales

Preliminary denitions and examples

Denition 1. A stochastic process {Xn|n= 0,1,2, ...} is a martingale if for n = 0,1,2, ...

(i)E[|Xn|] < ∞ (ii)E[Xn+1|X0, ..., Xn] = Xn

Denition 2. Let{Xn|n= 0,1,2, ...}and {Yn|n = 0,1,2, ...}be stochastic process.

We say {Xn} is martingale with respect to{Yn} if, for n= 0,1, ...

(i)E[|Xn|] < ∞ (ii)E[Xn+1|Y0, ..., Yn] = Xn

It is useful to think of (Y0, ..., Yn) as the information or history up to time or

stage n.

The history determines Xnin the sense that Xn is a function of (Y0, ..., Yn), i.e.

knowledge of (Y0, ..., Yn) determine the value ofXn.

E[Xn|Y0, ..., Yn] = Xn.

Using the law of iterative expectations, we have:

E[Xn+1] =E(E(Xn+1|Y0, ..., Yn)) = E(Xn).

To review the law of iterative expection: If G⊂H, thenE(X|G) =E(E(X|G)|H).

(2)

Example 3. Sum of independent random variables.

Let Y0 = 0 and Y1, Y2, ... be independent random variables with E(|Yn|) < ∞

and E(Yn) = 0 for all n. If X0 = 0 and Xn =Y1 +...+Yn for n ≥ 1, then {Xn} is

martingale w.r.t {Yn}. We can check the conditions as

(1)E(|Xn|) =E(|Y1+...+Yn|)≤E(|Y1|+...+|Yn|)<∞ (2)E(Xn+1|Y0, ..., Yn) = E(Xn+Yn+1|Y0, ..., Yn)

=E(Xn|Y0, ..., Yn) +E(Yn+1|Y0, ..., Yn) =Xn+E(Yn+1) =Xn.

Example 4. The variance of a sum as a martingale

Let Y0 = 0 and Y1, Y2, ... be independent and identically distributed random

variables with E(Yk) = 0 and E(Yk2) =σ2, k = 1,2, .... Let X0 = 0 and

Xn= n

X

k=1

Yk

!2

−nσ2.

Check:

(1) E|Xn|=E|(Pnk=1Yk)

2

−nσ2| ≤E(Pn

k=1Yk)

2

+nσ2

=E(Pn

k=1Yk2) +nσ2 = 2nσ2 <∞.

(2) E(Xn+1|Y0, ..., Yn) = E

(Yn+1+Pnk=1Yk)2−(n+ 1)σ2|Y0, ..., Yn

=EYn2+1+ 2Yn+1Pnk=1Yk+ (Pnk=1Yk)

2

−(n+ 1)σ2|Y0, ..., Yn

=EY2

n+1|•

+ 2E(Yn+1|•)Pnk=1Yk+Xn−σ2 =Xn.

Example 5. Doob's martingale process

Let Y1, Y2, ... be an arbitrary sequence of random variables. Suppose X is a

random variable satisying E(|X|) < ∞. Then, Xn ≡ E(X|Y0, Y1, ..., Yn) forms a

martingale w.r.t Yn. Xn is called Doob's process.

(1) E(|Xn|)= E[|E(X|Y0, ..., Yn)|]≤ E[E(|X||Y0, ..., Yn)] =E(|X|) <∞.

(2) E(Xn+1|Y0, ..., Yn) =E[E(X|Y0, ..., Yn+1)|Y0, ..., Yn] =E(X|Y0, ..., Yn) =Xn.

2. Martingales with respect to σ-eld

Denition 6. (Ω,F, P) is called a probability space

(1) The sample space: a set Ω whose elements ω correspond to the possible outcomes of an experiment

(2) The family of events: a collectionF of subsets Aof Ω. We say that the event

A occurs if the outcome ω of the experiment is an element of A

(3) The probability measure: a functionP dened on F and satisfying (a) 0 =P(φ)≤P(A)≤P(Ω)≤1

(b) P(A1∪A1) = P(A1) + P(A2) − P(A1∩A2) for Ai ∈ F, i= 1,2

(c)P(∪∞

(3)

Denition 7. σ-eld: A σ-eld of Ω, denoted byF, satises (i) A∈ F ⇒Ac∈ F where Ac denotes the complements of A

(ii) If A1 and A2 are inF, A1∩A2 is inF. For any sequence A1, A2, ...inF, the

unition A1∪A2∪...is in F

Example 8. Ω ={ω1, ω2, ω3, ω4},

F ={{ω1, ω2},{ω3},{ω4},{ω1, ω2, ω3},{ω1, ω2, ω4},{ω3, ω4},{ω1, ω2, ω3, ω4}, φ},

P({ω1, ω2}) = 0, P({ω3}) = P({(ω4}) = 1/2.

Note that (a) one cannot distinguish between states ω1 and ω2; (b) ω1 and ω2

can only occur with zero probability (Null set: {ω1}, {ω2}). To check, let A1 =

{ω1, ω2} ∈ F. Ac1 ={{ω3},{ω4},{ω3, ω4}, φ} ∈ F. Take A1 ={ω1, ω2}, A2 ={ω3}.

A1∪A2 ={ω1, ω2, ω3} ∈ F.

Denition 9. A random variable is a function X : Ω−→ R with the property: For any a ∈ R, the set {ω ∈ Ω : X(ω) = a} is in F. Intuitively, X is a r.v. if, for any possible outcome a, we will know whether X has this outcome from knowing the outcomes of events in F. If X is a r.v. w.r.t (Ω,F), we also say that X is F-measurable. Theσ-eld generated by a r.v. X is dened to be the smallestσ-eld w.r.t which X is measurable. It is denoted by F(X).

Example 10. If X has only denumerably many possible values a1, a2, ... and if

X(ω) = ω. Ai = {ω|X(ω) =ω =ai} which means that ω can only take on ai.

Dene Ω = ∪∞

i=1Ai. Note that Ai∩Aj = φ. What is the σ-eld generated X(ω)?

F(X) = {φ,Ω, every set that is the unition of some of the A0is}. Much smaller than F(ω).

Denition 11. Filtration. In order to facilitate our analysis of dynamic securities markets, we need to nd a way to model the information structure of the economy. A ltration is a family of sub σ-eld of F, Ft = {Ft : t ∈ [0, T]}, Fs ∈ Ft, ∀s < t.

Ft is interpreted as the information set that contains events observable at or before

time t. In a discrete time and nite space model, a ltration can be representated by an event tree, and the family of sub-F-elds can be generated from the partitions (unions) of the events.

Martingale w.r.t an increasing family of σ-elds

Let{Xn}∞0 be a sequence of real r.v.s on a probability space(Ω,F, P). Let{Fn}

be a sequence of sub σ-elds of F with F0 ⊂ F1... ⊂ Fn...⊂ F. We say that Xn is

adapted toFnif, for everyn,XnisFn-measurable. We think ofFn as containing the

information available at stage n. Fn ⊂ Fn+1 expresses the increases in information

(4)

Example 12. Let Ω = {ω1, ω2, ..., ω6} and P(ωi) > 0,∀i. Let F0 = {Ω, φ}, F1 =

{{ω1, ω2, ω3},{ω4, ω5, ω6},Ω, φ}, F2 = {all subsets ofΩ}. Check F1 is a σ-eld.

A1 ={ω1, ω2, ω3}, Ac1 ={ω4, ω5, ω6} ∈ F1. A1∪A2 = Ω. Done.

(1) Draw decision tree for this process) (2) LetX be a stochastic process dened by X(ωi,0) = 0, i= 1, ...,6

X(ω1,1) =X(ω2,1) = 1, X(ω3,1) =X(ω4,1) = 2,X(ω5,1) =X(ω6,3) = 1

X(ωi,2) =i, i= 1, ...,6

Is X adapted to F?

Note that adaptedness is simply an informational constraint: the value of the process at any time t can only depend on the information revealed on or before time t. In order to check measurability: For anyai ∈ R, the set {ω ∈ Ω|X(ω) = ai is in

F. Here, a1 = 1, a2 = 2, a3 = 3.

When X(ω) = a1 = 1, the set is (ω1, ω2)∈ F/ 1.

When X(ω) = a2 = 2, the set is (ω3, ω4) ∈ F/ 1. Thus, not measurable, not

adapted. Intuitively, at time 1, one cannot distinguish amongω1, ω2, ω3 according to

mathcalF. The value of X1, however, vary across {ω1, ω2}andω3}.

In nance, we always assume this property.

Denition 13. Martingale: A process X is called a martingale adapted toF if (i) Xt is measurable wrtFt

(ii) E(Xs|Ft) =Xt

(iii) E|Xt|<∞

Denition 14. A standard Brownian Motion is a process B dened by the proper-ties:

(a) B0 = 0 a.s.

(b) For times t and s > t, Bs−Bt is normally distributed with mean zero and

variance s−t.

(c) For timest0, ..., tnsuch that 0≤t0 < t1 < ... < tn <∞, the random variables

B(t0), B(t1)−B(t0), ..., B(tn)−B(tn−1) are independently distributed; and

(d) For each ω∈Ω, the sample patht →B(ω, t)is continuous

The following property regarding a BM will be useful (Homework).

• {Bt} is a martingale

• {B2

t −t}is a martingale, and E[(Bt−Bs)2|Fs] =t−s, t≥s

(5)

3. Ito Integrals

´T

0 f(t)dBt: If E

´T

0 |f(ω, t)|

2dt < , it is a martingale (H2 space). If

P ´ |f(ω, t)|2dt < = 1, the integral is also well-dened, but it's no longer a

martingale. It's called a local martingale (L2 space). L2 space is larger. For

example, if E´0T |f(ω, t)|2dt<, then´ |f(ω, t)|2dt < where p(ω)<.

An Ito process is an Ito integral plus an adapted process X(t) = X(0) + ´0ta(s)ds +´0tf(s)dBs, t ∈ [0, T], where

´T

0 |a(s)|ds < ∞ a.s.

´T

0 |f(s)|

2ds < a.s. Very often, we rewrite an Ito process in terms of a stochastic

dierential equation: dX(t) =a(t)dt+f(t)dBt.

Example 15. Ito's Lemma

Letf be twice continously dierntiable w.r.t the rst argument, and continuously dierentialble w.r.t the second argument. Let X be an Ito process: X(t) =X(0) +

´t

0a(s)ds+

´t

0 σ(s)dBs. Then,

f(X(t), t) =f(X(0),0) +

ˆ t

0

1 2fxxσ

2

(s)ds+

ˆ t

0

fxa(s)ds+

ˆ t

0

ftds+

ˆ t

0

fXdBs

In dierential form, we have

df(X(t), t) =

1

2fXXσ

2

+fXa(t) +ft

dt+fXσdBt

To illustrate,

• d[Bm

t ] =mB m−1

t dBt+ m(m

−1)

2 B

m−1

t dt

• Geometric BM: dS = µSdt+σSdBt. Let X = log(S), then dX/dS = S−1,

d2X/dS2 =−S−2,dX = (1 2S

−2σ2S2+S−1µS)dt+S−1σSdB

t=(µ−12σ2)dt+

σdBt. Let X0 ≡X(0) =logS0 then Xt=X0+ (µ− 12σ2)t+σ(Bt−B0).

• Let Z(t)≡exp´0tf(s)dBs− 12

´t

0 f

2(s)ds. Homework: dZ(t)=?

• ´0tBn(s)dB

s: Tryd[Btn+1] = (n+ 1)BntdBt+12n(n+ 1)Btn−1dt. Thus, BtndBt=

1

n+1dB

n+1

t −12nB

n−1

t dt

Homeworks

1. dWt = (a(t)Wt+b(t))dt+c(t)dBt. (1)

´T

0 e

´T

t a(u)du(dWt−a(t)Wtdt) =? (2)

F ≡exp−´0tβ1(u, Wu)du−

´t

0β2(u, Wu)dWu

V(t, W) where V(t, W)is well

(6)

2. dYt/Yt=µdt+σdBt;u(x, t) = e−δt x

1−b

1−b,δ > 0and b <0.

P(Y, t) =Et

ˆ ∞

t

ux(Ys, s)

ux(Yt, t)

Ysds

!

=?

References

Related documents

Keywords Dividend yield, European equity markets, Factor analysis, Liquidity, Liquidity determinants, Market capitalisation, Newly established firms, Securities markets, Trading

The dynamic time history analysis using a model which represents the whole system (structure and soil structure interaction) and a force and failure criteria in order to determine

Since the liquid-cooled ECR with a structure of two salient poles has a symmetrical structure, and a rotation period, in order to facilitate the analysis and calculation,

Gatekeepers facilitate issuer access to the securities markets by their partici- pation and can provide a necessary check on contemplated perpetration of im-

Gatekeepers facilitate issuer access to the securities markets by their partici- pation and can provide a necessary check on contemplated perpetration of im-

Keywords Dividend yield, European equity markets, Factor analysis, Liquidity, Liquidity determinants, Market capitalisation, Newly established firms, Securities markets, Trading

The basic idea of the domain analysis is to decompose the ITG environment into features in order to provide dynamic service composition and to facilitate the

Foerster, Bruce, 2000, Securities industry association’s Capital Markets Handbook (2 nd edition) Aspen, CO: Aspen Publishers. Gompers, Paul, and Josh Lerner, 2001, The