1 17809833
14
THANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
THE LIFE OF AN ACCIDENT AND
HOW TO HANDLE IT:
CASE STUDY
POTENTIAL PARTIES (DEEP POCKETS)
- Eastpointe Airport
- owned airport
- erected temporary barriers around the maintenance facility
- Sky Top Airlines
- owned the airplane - leased the apron
- were paid to secure the area where the maintenance was to be done - had put up signs
- Master Maintenance
- had subleased apron from Sky Top
- performing maintenance on widebody jets - had control of jet
- says Sky Top is responsible for safety
- Famous Fuel
3 17809833
FIRST STEPS AFTER ACCIDENT
- Make sure employees know the importance of intelligent document creation.
TWO APPROACHES TO DEFENSE
- True fault = Who is responsible? - litigation
- contribution actions - Contractual
- duty to defend - indemnity
5 17809833
- There will be negligence claims between parties. - Effect of workers compensation bar.
- Right to cross claim on contract.
EXPRESS OR CONTRACTUAL INDEMNITY
- Getting someone else to pay - liability
- defense
- Disfavored by courts. Must be “clear and unambiguous.” - Dependent on bargaining powers of contracting parties. - you get what you negotiate
7 17809833
CONTRACTUAL DEFENSES
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”. Indemnity provisions in:
Eastpointe Airport – Sky Top Contract
Eastpointe Airport – Famous Fuel Contract
THREE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL INDEMNITY
GENERALLY
- Broad form: Includes indemnitee’s own negligence.
9 17809833
STANDARD INDEMNITY CLAUSE
PROVISIONS IN AIRPORT CONTRACT
- “defend” and “indemnify”
- “any and all liabilities, claims” - “attorneys fees and costs” - “even if groundless”
11 17809833
INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS IN AVIATION
-Contracts for the supply of services or goods to airport
-Contracts for supply of goods and services to airlines
-Lessor – Lessee situations But:
A FEW RULES OF CONTRACT INTERPRETATION
1. Choice of law or “most significant contacts”.
2. Typically, not required to indemnify for own negligence unless contract clearly says so.
“This includes claims where it is asserted or shown that the acts or negligence of the Airport, in whole or in part, caused or contributed to the claimed loss or injury”.
13 17809833
ANTI-INDEMNITY STATUTES
- Agreements to indemnify for other’s intentional conduct are void as a matter of public policy.
- No indemnity for reckless or willful conduct.
DUTY TO DEFEND vs. INDEMNITY
- Governed by terms of agreement and allegations.
- “Party agrees, at its own expense, and upon written request of Airport, to defend any suit, action or demand brought against Airport on any claim covered herein.” - Reimbursement or take over defense?
15 17809833
WHEN PARTY IS ASKED TO INDEMNIFY:
- What is scope of agreement?
- Broad or limited to negligence of the airport?
- Are there defense obligations?
DUTY TO DEFEND
- Broad duty. Broader than duty to indemnify.
17 17809833
DUTY TO PROVIDE INSURANCE PROVISIONS
- “The Airline shall procure and keep in full force, at all times,
insurance covering all operations under this agreement, in such kinds and amounts . . .”
INSURANCE PROVISIONS
- Require Airline to protect airport by insuring that all contractors/subcontractors:
- indemnify and defend airport
- carry insurance
19 17809833
WHOSE POLICY IS PRIMARY?
QUESTIONS TO ASK
(1) Are there indemnity obligations?
(2) Are there defense obligations?
(3) Are there insurance implications? - your policy
21 17809833
ADDITIONAL PROTECTION
- Waiver of subrogation/contribution.
“To the extent that any loss of any kind is covered or paid by any insurer, the contracting parties hereby waive subrogation or contribution rights against each other and their respective officers, agents and employees, and the contracting parties shall notify their respective insurers of this waiver of subrogation agreement and shall cause this waiver of subrogation agreement to be included in the insurance policies secured by each of the contracting parties.”
ADDITIONAL PROTECTION
-Clause for non-liability for damage to Airline property.
23 17809833
DUTY TO TENDER
1. Must be timely. 2. Request indemnity. 3. Request defense.4. Request reimbursement of fees and costs.
TWO CASES HOT OFF THE PRESS
(1) Vumbaca v. Terminal One, U.S.D. Ct. N.Y. (2012) - 2010 incident at JFK Airport. 7 hours stranded.
- TOGA leases, finances and operates Terminal One. - Sole responsibility for gates.
- TOGA subcontracted with ASIG over ground handling. - Question: Is TOGA an “agent” of a carrier? If so, claims limited by Montreal Convention.
25 17809833
HOT OFF THE PRESS (2)
(2) Alicea v. JetBlue, N.Y.S. Ct., 2012 - Plaintiff lost balance on jet bridge - JetBlue
- Port Authority
- Oxford = Safety checks
- Defendants sue Oxford for indemnity and contribution - Oxford = “we were not negligent.”
IN THIS CASE
- Eastpointe Airport should tender to: - Its insurer
- Sky Top Airlines - Famous Fuel
27 17809833
LITIGATION ISSUES
- Right to sue other parties. - Right to cross claim
THE LAWSUIT
- State or federal court?
- Need to promptly secure counsel and respond. - Tender of claims.
29 17809833
INITIAL CHALLENGES
- Motions to dismiss - Affirmative defenses - Answer to complaintTHE MUNICIPAL IMMUNITY DEFENSE
- Most airports owned by government entity.
- Government not liable for torts that result from the performance of a governmental function.
DOCUMENTS
- Intelligent creation. - Early document hold. - Organized production.
33 17809833
COMPANY DEPOSITIONS
- Identify correct people to represent company. - Preparation.
EARLY MEDIATION PROCESS
- Court process.
35 17809833
EXPERTS
- Role in case
- aid lawyers - sell the case - Credentials
DEFENSE GOALS
- Narrow the case
- summary judgment
37 17809833
TRIAL OR SETTLEMENT
Key Factors:
- Implications of settlement on other matters. - Costs of defense vs. risk.
39 17809833
The House
COVERAGE Entrance: Insuring Agreement Side Door:Conditions through which coverage can also leave
if not satisfied
Is It Covered?
♦ Declarations (identity of insured, effective dates of policy, limits, retentions, etc.)
♦ Insuring agreements (insurer’s coverage obligations) ♦ Definitions
♦ Exclusions
♦ Terms and Conditions (reporting, cooperation, dispute resolution, etc.)
41 17809833
Declarations – Named Insured
♦ Is there a minimum ownership requirement? ♦ Limits and applicable deductibles
♦ Per Occurrence
♦ will vary between coverages ♦ Geographical limits
♦ Named premises
Insuring Agreements
♦ Bodily Injury or Property Damage
“We the Insurers agree, to the extent and in the manner hereinafter provided, and in consideration of the payment of Premium, to pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages in respect of bodily injury and/or property damage caused by an Occurrence during the Policy Period and arising out of the Hazards Covered set forth in the Policy Schedule”
43 17809833
Defense Costs
♦ Insurer will usually agree to defend any suit against the Named Insured in respect of liability for which coverage is provided under the policy.
♦ Is the coverage excess of primary (pro rata of expense against exposure)?
Premises Legal Liability
♦ PD or BI caused by an occurrence
45 17809833
Hangarkeepers’ Liability
♦ property damage to aircraft or aircraft equipment ♦ not owned, rented or leased by Named Insured ♦ caused by an occurrence
♦ whilst on the ground
Excess Legal Liability
♦ Liability attaches only after primary insurers have paid or been held liable to pay
♦ limits not increased by virtue of there being more than one insured
47 17809833
Contractual Agreements
♦ Waivers of subrogation, hold harmless agreements, indemnity agreements and contractual agreements are usually automatically included within the coverage, subject to the policy terms, conditions and exclusions of cover.
Exclusions
49 17809833
Definitions
♦ Named Insured – does the holder of an Insurance Certificate fall within the definition?
♦ relevant for exclusions eg employee of the Named Insured
♦ Occurrence – an accident, or a continued or repeated exposure to conditions occurring during the Policy Period, which results in
injury during the Policy Period provided the injury is accidentally caused
General Conditions
♦ The Named Insured shall not act in any way to the detriment or prejudice of the interest of the Insurers
• is separate representation necessary for defence of claim and the defence of a Third Party Action?
♦ Subrogation
• waiver of subrogation without insurers’ knowledge (Liberty Mutual v Altfillisch Construction Co, 70 Cal App. 3d 789 ♦ Cross Liability
51 17809833
Mark D. Meyer
Partner, Head of Aviation & Space Group Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP
Dashwood, 69 Old Broad Street London, EC2M 1QS +44 (0) 20 7556 4527 [email protected] Cal R. Burnton Partner
Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606
+1 312.201.2646