Oscillation Theorems for a Class of Nonlinear Second
Order Differential Equations with Damping
Xiaojing Wang, Guohua Song
School of Science, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China Email: [email protected]
Received November 8, 2012; revised December 7, 2012; accepted December 14,2012
ABSTRACT
The oscillatory behavior of solutions of a class of second order nonlinear differential equations with damping is studied and some new sufficient conditions are obtained by using the refined integral averaging technique. Some well known results in the literature are extended. Moreover, two examples are given to illustrate the theoretical analysis.
Keywords: Nonlinear Differential Equations; Damping Equations; Second Order; Oscillation Solutions
1. Introduction
In this paper, we are concerned with the oscillatory be-havior of solutions of the second-order nonlinear differ-ential equations with damping
r t x t k x t
p t k x t
x t
C
, ,k f g,
,
C R R
1 2 1
, , ,
c c c
q t f x t g
, ,r t p t q t
0
0,t t 0,
t0, ,R
(1.1)
where and
.
In what follows with respect to Equation (1.1), we shall assume that there are positive constants and 2 satisfying
(A1) r t
0 and for all ; 0
x 0 x01
c
xf
t
(A2) c x
for all x; (A3) 1 0 and k
y
for all2
1yk y
yR;
(A4) q t
0 and 0c2g x t
;
(A5) 2
f x
x x0
0r t x t q t f x t
(
0r t x t p t x t q t f x t
0,r t x t k x t p t k x t
q t f x t
0
for all .
We shall consider only nontrivial solutions of Equa-tion (1.1) which are defined for all large t. A solution of Equation (1.1) is said to be oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros, otherwise it is said to be nonoscillatory. Equation (1.1) is called oscillatory if all its solutions are oscillatory.
The oscillation problem for various particular cases of Equation (1.1) such as the nonlinear differential equation
, (1.2)
the nonlinear damped differential equation
(1.3)
and
(1.4)
have been studied extensively in recent years, see e.g. [1-21] and the references quoted therein. Moreover, in 2011, Wang [22] established some oscillation criteria for Equation (1.1) firstly, some new sharper results are ob-tained in the present paper.
An important method in the study of oscillatory be-haviour for Equations (1.1)-(1.4) is the averaging tech-nique which comes from the classical results of Wintner [19] and Hartman [18]. Using the generalized Riccati technique and the refined integral averaging technique introduced by Rogovchenko and Tuncay [20,21], several new oscillation criteria for Equation (1.1) are established in Section 2, we also show some examples to explain the application of our oscillation theorems in Section 2. Our results strengthen and improve the recent results of [1] and [21,22].
2. The Main Results
Following Philos [10], let us introduce now the class of functions which will be extensively used in the se-quel. Let
0 , : 0
D t s t s t and D
t s, :t s t0
.
;
H
The function C D R is said to belong to the class if
, 0H t t for ; on ;
1) 0 0
2)
3) There exists a function h t
,s C D R
,
such that
,
H t s
h t,s H t s,
s
.
In this section, several oscillation criteria for Equation (1.1) are established under the assumptions (A1)-(A5). The first result is the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1. Let assumption (A1)-(A5) be fulfilled and H . If there exists functions R,C t
0,
,R
such that
rR C t1 0, , R
and
0 0
,
0 inf lim inf , ,
s t t
H t s H t t
(2.1)
0
2
lim sup t d ,
t t
s s s r s
0, 1
T t
(2.2)
and for any
,
1 1
21
lim sup , , d .
, 4
t
T t
c
T H t s Q s s r s h t s s
H t T
(2.3)where
Q t t (2.4)
2
2 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
4
2
exp t d ,
p t
t R t r t p t R t r t R t
c c c c r t
R s p s
t s
2 2
c q
1 1 2
c r s
s max
s , 0
(2.5)
and , then Equation (1.1) is
oscil-latory.
Proof. Let x t
x t
be a nonoscillatory solution of Equation (1.1). Then there exists a T0 0 such that
for all . Without loss of generality, we may assume that on interval
. A simi-lar argument holds also for the case whent
0 tT0
0x t T0,
x t is even-tually negative. As in [1], define a generalized Riccati transformation by
r t
x t
k x t
v t t r t R t
x t
(2.6)
for all tT0, then differentiating Equation (2.6) and
using Equation (1.1), we obtain
2
t p t k x t t
v t v t
t x t
t g x t f x t x t
t x t k x t x t
x t
t R t r t
t q
t r
(2.7)
In view of (A1)-(A5), we get
2
2 2 2
1
2 2
1 1
1
2 1
1 1
2 4
4
x t t r t x t k x t
t
v t c t q t t R t r t
t x t
x t k x t
t t p t t r t p t
t r t t v t
t r t x t x t x t r t
x t k x t
t t p t t r t
v t
t cr t c x t
2 2
t p t k
t x
c t q
2 2
t R t r t c t q t
v t
t
R
2 2
1 1 1
2
t R t r t c t q
t R t p
Q t
t c c
2 12 2
1 1
2 2
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
2
4 2
4 2
p t r t
x t k x t
t t p t t r t p t
t R t r t c t q t v t
t cr t c x t r t
t t p t t r t v t p t
t v t R t
t cr t c t r t r t
t r
1 1
2
1 1
21 1
v t v t Q t v t
t c t r t c t r t
for all with
defined as above. Then we ob- tain0
T Q t
t
1 2
v t c1 1 t r t
Q t v t
. (2.8)
On multiplying Equation (2.8) (with t replaced by s) by H t s
,0
t T T
, integrating with respect to s from T to t for , using integration by parts and property 3), we get
2
1 1
2
1 1 2
1
, d , d , d
1
, d , , d
, d .
t t t
T T T
t t
t
T T T
H t s Q s s H t s v s s H t s v s s
c s r s
1 1
, t , ,
T
H t s v s v s H t s H t s v s s
c s r s
v s
H t T v T v s h t s H t s H t s
c s r s s
1
Then, for any
2
1 1 1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
, 1
, d , , d
2
1 ,
, d d ,
4
t t
T T
t t
T T
H t s
H t s Q s s H t T v T v s c s r s h t s s
c s r s
H t s c
s r s h t s s v s s
c s r s
and, for all t T T0,
21 1 1 1
, 1 ,
d d
2
H t s
2 1 1
2
1 1
, , d
4
1
, ,
t
T
t t
T T
c
H t s Q s s r s h t s s
H t s
H t T v T v s c s r s h t s s
v s sc s r s c s r s
(2.9)
Furthermore,
1 1
2
1 1
2 d .1 ,
1 1
, , d
, 4 ,
t t
T T
H t s c
H t s Q s s r s h t s s v T
H t T H t T c s r s
v s sNow, it follows that
1
2
, 4
1 , 1
lim inf d .
,
T t
t
T t
2 1 1
1 1
1
lim sup
tH t s Q s, c s r s h t s, ds
H t T
H t s
v T v s s
H t T c s r s
(2.10)
From (2.3) and (2.10), we have
1 1
21 , 1
lim inf d
,
t T t
H t s
v s s
H t T c s r s
v T T
0
TT 1
for all and
v T T T0
. Obviously,
for all T (2.11)
and
0
2
0
1 1
0 0
, 1
lim inf d
,
1
t
T t
H t s
v s s
H t T s r s
c
v T T
(2.12)
Now, we can claim that
0
2
d
T
v s
s s r s
, (2.13) Otherwise,
0
2
d
T
v s
s s r s
. (2.14)By (2.1), there exists a positive constant such that
0 0
,
inf lim inf 0 ,
s t t
H t s
H t t
2 1
T T
,
, 1
H t T H t,t0 for all tT2.
0
On the other hand, by (2.14) for any 1 0
T T
, there ex-ists a such that
0
2
d
t
T
v s
s s r s
for all tT1.Using integration by parts, we obtain
0
0 0
1
2
0
2
0
0
1
0
, 1
d ,
, 1
,
, 1
d ,
, . ,
t T
t s
T T
t T
H t s
v s s
H t T s r s
H t s v
d ds
H t T s
H t s s
H t T s
H t T H t T
r
This implies that
0
2
0
, 1
d ,
t T
H t s
v s s
H t T
s r s for all tT2. is an arbitrary positive constant, we get Since
0
2
0
, 1
lim inf d
,
t T t
H t s
v s s
H t T s r s
,which contradicts (2.12), so (2.13) holds, and from (2.11)
0 0
2 2
d d
T T
s v s
s s
s r s s r s
1
, n , ,
,
which contradicts (2.2), then Equation (1.1) is oscilla-tory.
H
Now, we define t s t s t sD
2
n H
, here . Evidently,
and
3 2
, 1 n , ,
h t s n ts t sD .
Thus, by Theorem 2.1, we obtain the following result. Corollary 2.1. Let assumption (A1)-(A5) be fulfilled. Suppose that (2.2) holds. If there exist functions
0
, , ,
RC t R such that
rR C1
t0,
,R
,
1
1 1
1
2 3
1
sup d
4
t n n
n T
c n
t s Q s s r s t s s T
t
1 lim
t
,
where and are defined as in Theorem 2.1, then Equation (1.1) is oscillatory.
Q t
t Example 2.1. Consider the nonlinear dampeddiffer-ential equation
2 3 4 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2 6 6 sin 1 1 0
1 1
x
x t
t t t t t t x t x t x t
x t
,
x t1
1 e
2 2
x t x t
.
where and , 1
2
c , c1c21,
2
1 1
f x
x t 2 1
x
2
.
The assumptions (A1)-(A5) hold. If we take , and , then
3
n R t
t
t 1, and
2 2 22 3 6 sin
Q t t t t
.
A direct computation yields that the conditions of Co- rallary 2.1 are satisfied, Equation (1.1) is oscillatory.
As a direct consequence of Theorem 2.1, we get the following result.
Corollary 2.2. In Theorem 2.1, if condition (2.3) is re- placed by
1 1
2
1 1
, , d ,
, 4
t
T
c H
lim inf
t T t s Q s s r s h t s s T
H t
where and are the same as in Theo-rem 2.1, then Equation (1.1) is oscillatory.
,Q t t
t1
Theorem 2.2. Let assumption (A1)-(A5) be fulfilled. For some , if there exist functions
0
, , ,
R C t R such that
1
0, ,
C t R
rR
and
0
2
1 1 1 2
0 1
1
lim sup , , , d ,
, 2 2
t t t
p s s c
H t s Q s H t s s r s h t s s
H t t c r s
where Q t
is the same as in Theorem 2.1, H and
1 1
d t
R s s
2 exp
t
c
(2.16)
Then Equation (1.1) is oscillatory.
t
tion (1.1
be a nonoscillatory solution of Equa-
). Then there exists a T0t0 such that
0x t for all 0 ithout loss of rality, we may assume that
tT . W gene
0x t on interval
T . A simi-lar argument hol
0,ds also for the case when x t
is even-tuon Proof. Let
ally negative.
Define the functi v t
as in (2.6). Using (A1)-(A5) and (2.7), we havex
2
2 2 2
1
2
1 1 1 1 1
2
1
1
t p t k x t t r t x t k x t
t
v t c t q t t R t r t
t x t x t
t R t p t
Q t v t v t
t c c r t c t r t
p t
Q t v t v t
c r t c t r t
1 1 1
2
v t
(2.17)
here Q t
is the same as in Theorem 2.1. On the nd, sw
other ha ince the inequality
2
m n
2 2
2 2
ml nl l
n
holds for all n0 and ,m lR. Let
1 1 1
1
, ,
t
m n l v t
c r t c r t t
,
we get from (2.17) that
1p2
t
t
2
1 1 1
0
,
2 2
.
v t
Q t v t
c r t c t r t
t T
(2.18)
On multiplying (2.18) (with t replaced by s) by
,H t s , integrating with respect to s from T to t for 0
T and 1
t T , using integration by parts and ), we g
property 3 et
2 1
1
2
1 1 1 1
2 2
1 1
, d
2
, 1
, 2 , d
2 2
1 ,
, d d ,
2 2
t
T
t t
T T
p s s
H t s Q s s
c r s
H t s
1 1 t
T
H t T v T v s c r s s h t s s
c r s s
H t s c
r s s h t s s v s s
c r s s
This implies that
2
1 1 1 2
1
2
1 1
2
1 1 1 1
, , , d
2 2
1 ,
, d
2
, 1
2 , d
2 2
t
T
t
T
p s s c
t
T H t s
H t T
Q s H t s r s s h t s sc r s H t s
v T v s s
c r s s
H t s
v s c r s s h t s s
c r s s
Using the properties of H t s
, , we have
0
2
1 1 1
1
0 0 0 0 0 0
, ,
2 2
, , , .
t T
p s s c 2
, d
H t s Q s H t s r s s h
c r s
H t T v T H t T v T H t t v T
fore,
t s s
0
0 0
0
0 0
2
1 1 1 2
1
2
1 1 1
1
2
1 1 1
1
0 0
, ,
2 2
, ,
2 2
, ,
2 2
, d
t
t
T
t
t
T
T
t
p s s c
H t s Q s H t s r s s h
c r s
p s s c 2
2
, d
, d
, d
t s s
H t s Q s H t s r s s
c r s
p s s c
h t s s
H t s Q s H t s r s
c r s
H t t Q s s v T
s h t s s
for all tT0, and so
0
0 0
2
1 1 1
0 1
0 1
lim sup , ,
, 2
d ,
t
t t
T
t
p s s c 2
, d
2
H t s Q s H t s r s
H t t c r s
Q s s v T
s h t s s
which contradicts with the assumption (2.15). This
com-
pletes the proof of Theorem 2.2.
Let H t s
, t s
n1, ,t sD , from Theorem 2.2, lt.Corollary 2.3. Let assumption (A1)-(A5) be fulfilled. If
we obtain the next resu
there exist functions R, C t
0,
,R
such that
1
0, ,
C t R ,
and
rR
1
1 2
1 1 2
31
1
d
2 2
n p s s c n n
t s Q s s r s t s s
c r s
olds for some integer n2 and 1 1
1 lim sup n t
T t t
x
,
h , where Q t , 1
and
t are defined as heorem then Equ (1.1) illatory.Example 2.2. Consi
in T 2.2, ation
is osc
der the nonlinear damped differ-ential equation
2 2
2 2 2
2 2
2
1 1
1 1 1
3 1
2 1 1 0.
8 2
2
2 x t x t x t
t t t
x t x t x t
t x t x t
x t
(2.19)
Evidently, for all and t1,
2 1 x t 2 c1
we
c c
have
,
and
2 12
1
1 1
2
f x
x x t .
Let R t
0,n3, thenand
t 1 1 2
2 4
Q t t .
2 2
1 1 1 1 3
1
2 2
( 1)
d
2 2
4 1 d ,
n p s s c n n
Q s s r s t s s
c r s
t s s s
1
2 1 1 lim sup
1
im sup 2
t
n T
t
t
t
t s t
t
erefo n (2 s os ry by Corallary
2.
ption (A1)-(A5) be fulfilled
and H
Th re, Equatio .19) i cillato . If there exist functions R, C t0, ,Rch that
3.
Theorem 2.3. Let assum
su (2.1) holds and
10, ,
C t R , and
fo for some 1
rR
r all tt0, any T t0, and ,
1 2 1 1
21
1
, , , d ,
, 2 2
t T
p s s c
T H t s Q s H t s s r s h t s s
H t T c r s
(2.20)
Q t and
t are the same as in Theorem 2.2
n (1.1
Proof. The proof of this theorem is similar to that of .
lim sup
t
where
and max
, 0
. If (2.2) is satisfied, thenEqua .
Theorem 2.1 and hence is omitted
s s
) is oscillatory
fulfilled except the condition (2.20) be replaced by
1 2
1 1
1
1
lim inf , ,
, 2
t T t
p s s c
T H t s Q s H t s
H t T c r s
2, d , 2 s r s h t s s
en Equation (1.1) is oscillatory. th
Remark 2.1. If we take f x
x, then the conditionq
Rema
t 0 is not necessary.rk 2.2. If we take g x t
1,
to Theorek x x
Th m 9 and 10 o
, then
eorem 2.3 and 2.4 reduce f [21]
with 1 1, respectively.
Remark 2.3. If replace (A5) and (2.6) by f
x ex-ists, f
x 2 0 for x0 and define
v t t r t R t
f x t
respectively, we can obtain similar oscillation results th
3. Acknowledgements
the National Natural
Sci-REFERENCES
[1] Q. R. Wang, Nonlinear Second
of
x t k x t
at are derived in the present paper.
This work was supported by
ence Foundation of China (11071011), the Funding Pro-ject for Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality (PHR201107123), the Plan Project of Science and Technology of Beijing Municipal Educa-tion Committee (KM201210016007) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing University of Civil Engi-neering and Architecture (10121907).
“Oscillation Criteria for
Order Damped Differential Equations,” Acta Mathemati- ca Hungarica, Vol. 102, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 117-139. [2] R. P. Agarwal and S. R. Grace, “On the Oscillation
Certain Second Order Differential Equations,” Georgian Mathematical Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2000, pp. 201-213. [3] B. Ayanlar and A. Tiryaki, “Oscillation Theorems for Non-
linear Second Order Differential Equations with Damp- ing,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, Vol. 89, No. 1-2, 2000, pp. 1-13.doi:10.1023/A:1026716923088
[4] S. R. Grace, “Oscillation Theorems for Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations of Second Order,” Journal of Mathema- tical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 171, No. 1, 1992, pp. 220-241.doi:10.1016/0022-247X(92)90386-R
[5] I. V. Kamenev, “An Integral Criterion for Oscillation of
doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00172-1
Linear Differential Equations of Second Order,” Mate- maticheskie Zametki, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1978, pp. 136-138. [6] M. Kirane and Y. V. Rogovchenko, “On Oscillation of
Nonlinear Second Order Differential Equation with Damp- ing Term,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 117, No. 2-3, 2001, pp. 177-192.
[7] M. Kirane and Y. V. Rogovchenko, “Oscillation Results erential Equation with al of Mathematical for a Second Order Damped Diff
Nonmonotonous Nonlinearity,” Journ
Analysis and Applications, Vol. 250, No. 1, 2000, pp. 118-138.doi:10.1006/jmaa.2000.6975
[8] H. J. Li, “Oscillation Criteria for Second Order Linear Differential Equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analy-sis and Applications, Vol. 194, No. 1, 1995, pp. 217-234.
doi:10.1006/jmaa.1995.1295
[9] W. T. Li, “Oscillation of Certain Second-Order Nonlinear Differential Equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analy-sis and Applications, Vol. 217, No. 1, 1998, pp. 1-14.
doi:10.1006/jmaa.1997.5680
[10] Ch. G. Philos, “Oscillation Theorems for Linear Differen-tial Equations of Second Order,” Archiv der Mathemati Vol. 53, No. 5, 1989, pp.
482-k, 492.
doi:10.1007/BF01324723
[11] Y. V. Rogovchenko, “Oscillation Theorems for Second- Order Equations with Damping,”
Theory, Methods & Applications, Vol. 41
Nonlinear Analysis: , No. 7-8, 2000, pp. 1005-1028.doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00324-1
[12] Y. V. Rogovchenko, “On Oscillation of a Second Order Nonlinear Delay Differential Equation,” Funkcialaj Ek-vacioj, Vol. 43, 2000, pp. 1-29.
[13] Y. V. Rogovchenko, “Oscillation Criteria for Second Order Nonlinear Perturbed Differential Equations,” Jour- nal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 215, No. 2, 1997, pp. 334-357.doi:10.1006/jmaa.1997.5595
[14] Q. R. Wang, “Oscillation and Asymptotics for Second- Order Half-Linear Differential Equations,” Applied Ma- thematics and Computation, Vol. 122, No. 2, 2001, pp. 253-266.doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(00)00056-4
[15] Q. R. Wang, “Oscillation Criteria for Even Order Nonlin-ear Damped Differential Equations,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, Vol. 95, No. 23, 2002, pp. 169-178.
doi:10.1023/A:1015676519998
[16] A. Tiryaki and A. Zafer, “Oscillation Criteria for Second order Nonlinear Differential Equations with Da Turkish Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 24, 2000,
mping,” pp. 185-
erican Mathematical Society, Vol. 98, No. 2, 1986, 196.
[17] J. Yan, “Oscillation Theorems for Second Order Linear Differential Equations with Damping,” Proceedings of the Am
pp. 276-282.doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1986-0854033-4
[18] P. Hartman, “On Non-Oscillatory Linear Differential Equations of Second Order,” American Journal of Mathe- matics, Vol. 74, No. 2, 1952, pp. 389-400.
doi:10.2307/2372004
[19] A. Wintner, “A Criterion of Oscillatory Stability,” Quar-terly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 7, 1949, pp
[20] Y. V. Rogovchenko an
Damping,” Nonlinear Analysis, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2008, pp. 208-221.doi:10.1016/j.na.2007.05.012
[21] Y. V. Rogcvchenko and F. Tuncay, “Oscillation Theo-rems for a Class of Second Order Nonlinear Differential Equations with Damping,” Taiwanese Journal of
Mathe-matics, Vol. 13, No. 6B, 2009, pp. 1909-1928.