R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Some approximation properties of
(
p
,
q
)-Bernstein operators
Shin Min Kang
1, Arif Rafiq
2, Ana-Maria Acu
3, Faisal Ali
4and Young Chel Kwun
5**Correspondence: yckwun@dau.ac.kr
5Department of Mathematics, Dong-A University, Busan, 49315, Korea
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the (p,q)-analog of Bernstein operators. It is proved that, when the function is convex, the (p,q)-Bernstein operators are monotonic decreasing, as in the classical case. Also, some numerical examples based on Maple algorithms that verify these properties are considered. A global approximation theorem by means of the Ditzian-Totik modulus of smoothness and a Voronovskaja type theorem are proved.
MSC: 41A10; 41A25; 41A35
Keywords: (p,q)-Bernstein operators; (p,q)-calculus; Voronovskaja type theorem; K-functional; Ditzian-Totik first order modulus of smoothness
1 Introduction and preliminaries
During the last decade, the applications ofq-calculus in the field of approximation theory
has led to the discovery of new generalizations of classical operators. Lupaş [] was first to
observe the possibility of usingq-calculus in this context. For more comprehensive details
the reader should consult monograph of Aralet al.[] and the recent references [–].
Nowadays, the generalizations of several operators in post-quantum calculus, namely the (p,q)-calculus have been studied intensively. The (p,q)-calculus has been used in many areas of sciences, such as oscillator algebra, Lie group theory, field theory, differential
equations, hypergeometric series, physical sciences (see [, ]). Recently, Mursaleenet
al.[] defined (p,q)-analog of Bernstein operators. The approximation properties for
these operators based on Korovkin’s theorem and some direct theorems were considered. Also, many well-known approximation operators have been introduced using these tech-niques, such as Bleimann-Butzer-Hahn operators [] and Szász-Mirakyan operators [].
In the present paper, we prove new approximation properties of (p,q)-analog of
Bern-stein operators. First of all, we recall some notations and definitions from the (p,q
)-calculus. Let <q<p≤. For each non-negative integer n≥k≥, the (p,q)-integer [k]p,q, (p,q)-factorial [k]p,q!, and (p,q)-binomial are defined by
[k]p,q:=
pk–qk
p–q ,
[k]p,q! :=
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
[k]p,q[k– ]p,q· · ·[]p,q, k≥,
, k= ,
and
n k
p,q
:= [n]p,q! [n–k]p,q![k]p,q!
.
As a special case whenp= , the above notations reduce toq-analogs.
The (p,q)-power basis is defined as
(xa)np,q= (x–a)(px–qa)px–qa· · ·pn–x–qn–a. The (p,q)-derivative of the functionf is defined as
Dp,qf(x) =
f(px) –f(qx)
(p–q)x , x= .
Letf be an arbitrary function anda∈R. The (p,q)-integral off on [,a] is defined as
a
f(t)dp,qt= (q–p)a
∞
k=
f
pk
qk+a
pk
qk+, if
pq< ,
a
f(t)dp,qt= (p–q)a
∞
k=
f
qk pk+a
qk pk+, if
qp< .
The (p,q)-analog of Bernstein operators forx∈[, ] and <q<p≤ are introduced as follows:
Bpn,q(f;x) =
n
k=
bpn,,qk(x)f
pn–k[k]p,q
[n]p,q
,
where the (p,q)-Bernstein basis is defined as
bpn,,qk(x) =
n k
p,q
p[k(k–)–n(n–)]/xk(x)np–,qk.
Lemma . For x∈[, ], <q<p≤,we have
Bnp,q(e;x) = , Bnp,q(e;x) =x,
Bpn,q(e;x) =
pn–
[n]p,q
x+q[n– ]p,q [n]p,q
x,
where ei(x) =xiand i∈ {, , }.
Lemma . Let n be a given natural number,then
Bpn,q(t–x);x= p
n–
[n]p,q
φ(x)≤ [n]p,q
φ(x),
2 Monotonicity for convex functions
Oru and Phillips [] proved that when the functionf is convex on [, ], itsq-Bernstein
operators are monotonic decreasing. In this section we will study the monotonicity of (p,q)-Bernstein operators.
Theorem . If f is convex function on[, ],then
Bpn,q(f;x)≥f(x), ≤x≤,
for all n≥and <q<p≤.
Proof We consider the knotsxk=p
n–k[k] p,q
[n]p,q ,λk=
n k
p,qp
[k(k–)–n(n–)]/xk(x)n–k
p,q, ≤k≤n.
Using Lemma ., it follows that
λ+λ+· · ·+λn= ,
xλ+x+λ+· · ·+xnλn=x.
From the convexity of the functionf, we get
Bpn,q(f;x) =
n
k=
λkf(xk)≥f
n
k=
λkxk
=f(x).
Example . Letf :R→R,f(x) =xex+. Figure illustrates thatBp,q
n (f;x)≥f(x) for the
convex functionf andx∈[, ].
Theorem . Let f be convex on[, ].Then Bpn,–q(f;x)≥Bnp,q(f;x)for <q<p≤, ≤
x≤,and n≥.If f ∈C[, ]the inequality holds strictly for <x< unless f is linear in each of the intervals between consecutive knots pn[––n–]k[k]p,q
p,q , ≤k≤n– ,in which case we
[image:3.595.118.478.547.734.2]have the equality.
Proof For <q<p≤ we begin by writing
n–
s=
ps–qsx–Bpn,–q(f;x) –Bpn,q(f;x)
=
n–
s=
ps–qsx–
n–
k=
n–
k
p,q
p[k(k–)–(n–)(n–)]/xk(x)np–,qk–f
pn––k[k]
[n– ]
– n– k= n k
p,q
p[k(k–)–n(n–)]/xk(x)np–,qkf
pn–k[k] [n]
= n– k=
n–
k
p,q
p[k(k–)–(n–)(n–)]/xk
n–
s=n–k–
ps–qsx–f
pn––k[k]
[n– ]
– n k= n k
p,q
p[k(k–)–n(n–)]/xk
n–
s=n–k
ps–qsx–f
pn–k[k]
[n]
.
Denote
k(x) =p
k(k–) xk
n–
s=n–k
ps–qsx–, (.)
and using the following relation:
pn–pk(k–)xk
n–
s=n–k–
ps–qsx–=pkk(x) +qn–k–k+(x),
we find
n–
s=
ps–qsx–Bpn,–q(f;x) –Bpn,q(f;x)
=
n–
k=
n–
k
p,q
p–(n–)(n–)p–(n–)pkk(x) +qn–k–k+(x)f
pn––k[k]p,q
[n– ]p,q
– n k= n k
p,q
p–n(n–)
k(x)f
pn–k[k] p,q
[n]p,q
=p–n(n–)
n–
k=
n–
k
p,q
pkk(x)f
pn––k[k] p,q
[n– ]p,q
+ n k=
n–
k–
p,q
qn–kk(x)f
pn–k[k– ] p,q
[n– ]p,q
– n k= n k k(x)f
pn–k[k] p,q
[n]p,q
=p–n(n–)
n–
k=
n–
k
p,q
pkf
pn––k[k] p,q
[n– ]p,q
+
n–
k–
p,q
qn–kf
pn–k[k– ] p,q
[n– ]p,q
– n k
p,q
f
pn–k[k]p,q
[n]p,q
=p–n(n–)
n–
k=
n k
p,q
[n–k]p,q
[n]p,q
pkf
pn––k[k] p,q
[n– ]p,q
+[k]p,q [n]p,q
qn–kf
pn–k[k– ]p,q
[n– ]p,q
–f
pn–k[k]p,q
[n]p,q
k(x)
=p–n(n–)
n–
k=
n k
p,q
akk(x),
where
ak=
[n–k]p,q
[n]p,q
pkf
pn––k[k]p,q
[n– ]p,q
+[k]p,q [n]p,q
qn–kf
pn–k[k– ]p,q
[n– ]p,q
–f
pn–k[k]p,q
[n]p,q
.
From (.) it is clear that eachk(x) is non-negative on [, ] for <q<p≤ and, thus, it
suffices to show that eachakis non-negative.
Sincef is convex on [, ], then for anyt,t∈[, ] andλ∈[, ], it follows that
fλt+ ( –λ)t
≤λf(t) + ( –λ)f(t).
If we chooset=p
n–k[k–] p,q
[n–]p,q ,t=
pn––k[k]p,q
[n–]p,q , andλ=
[k]p,q
[n]p,qq
n–k, thent
,t∈[, ] andλ∈
(, ) for ≤k≤n– , and we deduce that
ak=λf(t) + ( –λ)f(t) –f
λt+ ( –λ)t
≥.
ThusBpn,–q(f;x)≥B
p,q n (f;x).
We have equality forx= andx= , since the Bernstein polynomials interpolatef on
these end-points. The inequality will be strict for <x< unless whenf is linear in each of the intervals between consecutive knots pn––k[k]p,q
[n–]p,q , ≤k≤n– , then we haveB
p,q n–(f;x) =
Bpn,q(f;x) for ≤x≤.
Example . Letf(x) =sin(πx),x∈[, ]. Figure illustrates the monotonicity of (p,q
)-Bernstein operators forp= . andq= .. We note that iff is increasing (decreasing)
[image:5.595.118.478.547.733.2]on [, ], then the operators is also increasing (decreasing) on [, ].
3 A global approximation theorem
In the following we establish a global approximation theorem by means of Ditzian-Totik modulus of smoothness. In order to prove our next result, we recall the definitions of the
Ditzian-Totik first order modulus of smoothness and theK-functional []. Letφ(x) =
√
x( –x) andf ∈C[, ]. The first order modulus of smoothness is given by
ωφ(f;t) = sup
<h≤t
f
x+hφ(x)
–f
x–hφ(x)
,x±hφ(x)
∈[, ]
. (.)
The correspondingK-functional to (.) is defined by
Kφ(f;t) = inf g∈Wφ[,]
f –g+tφg (t> ),
whereWφ[, ] ={g:g∈ACloc[, ],φg<∞}andg∈ACloc[, ] means thatgis
abso-lutely continuous on every interval [a,b]⊂[, ]. It is well known ([], p.) that there exists a constantC> such that
Kφ(f;t)≤Cωφ(f;t). (.)
Theorem . Let f ∈C[, ]andφ(x) =√x( –x),then for every x∈[, ],we have
Bpn,q(f;x) –f(x)≤Cωφ
f; [n]p,q
,
where C is a constant independent of n and x.
Proof Using the representation
g(t) =g(x) +
t x
g(u)du,
we get
Bpn,q(g;x) –g(x)=Bpn,q
t x
g(u)du;x. (.)
For anyx∈(, ) andt∈[, ] we find that
xtg(u)du≤φg
t x
φ(u)du
. (.)
Further,
xt φ(u)du=
t x
√
u( –u)du
≤ t
x
√
u+
√
–u
du
= |t–x|
√
t+√x+
√
–t+√ –x
< |t–x|
√
x+
√
–x
≤ √
|t–x|
φ(x) . (.)
From (.)-(.) and using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain
Bpn,q(g;x) –g(x)< √φgφ–(x)Bnp,q|t–x|;x
≤√φgφ–(x)Bnp,q(t–x);x/.
Using Lemma ., we get
Bp,q
n (g;x) –g(x)≤
√
[n]p,q
φg.
Now, using the above inequality we can write
Bpn,q(f;x) –f(x)≤Bpn,q(f –g;x)+f(x) –g(x)+Bpn,q(g;x) –g(x)
≤√
f–g+ [n]p,q
φg
.
Taking the infimum on the right-hand side of the above inequality over allg∈Wφ[, ],
we get
Bpn,q(f;x) –f(x)≤CKφ
f; [n]p,q
.
Using equation (.) this theorem is proven.
4 Voronovskaja type theorem
Using the first order Ditzian-Totik modulus of smoothness, we prove a quantitative
Voronovskaja type theorem for the (p,q)-Bernstein operators.
Theorem . For any f ∈C[, ]the following inequalities hold:
(i) |[n]p,q[Bnp,q(f;x) –f(x)] –p
n–φ(x)
f(x)| ≤Cωφ(f,φ(x)n–/),
(ii) |[n]p,q[Bnp,q(f;x) –f(x)] –p
n–φ(x)
f(x)| ≤Cφ(x)ωφ(f,n–/),
where C is a positive constant.
Proof Letf ∈C[, ] be given andt,x∈[, ]. Using Taylor’s expansion, we have
f(t) –f(x) = (t–x)f(x) +
t x
(t–u)f(u)du.
Therefore,
f(t) –f(x) – (t–x)f(x) – (t–x)
f(x) = t
x
(t–u)f(u)du–
t x
(t–u)f(x)du
=
t x
In view of Lemma . and Lemma ., we get
Bpn,q(f;x) –f(x) – p
n–
[n]p,q
φ(x)f(x)≤Bpn,q
t x
|t–u|f(u) –f(x)du;x
. (.)
The quantity|xt|f(u) –f(x)||t–u|du|was estimated in [], p., as follows:
t
x
f(u) –f(x)|t–u|du≤f–g(t–x)+ φgφ–(x)|t–x|, (.)
whereg∈Wφ[, ]. On the other hand, for anym= , , . . . and <q<p≤, there exists a
constantCm> such that
Bpn,q(t–x)mp,q;x≤Cm
φ(x)
[n] m+
p,q
, (.)
wherex∈[, ] andais the integer part ofa≥.
Throughout this proof,Cdenotes a constant not necessarily the same at each
occur-rence.
Now, combining (.)-(.) and applying Lemma ., the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we get
Bpn,q(f;x) –f(x) –p
n–φ(x)
[n]p,q
f(x)
≤f–gBnp,q(t–x);x+ φgφ–(x)Bnp,q|t–x|;x
≤f–gφ
(x)
[n]p,q
+ φgφ–(x)Bpn,q(t–x);x/Bpn,q(t–x);x/
≤f–gφ
(x)
[n]p,q
+ C
[n]p,q
φgφ(x)
[n]p,q
≤ C
[n]p,q
φ(x)f–g+ [n]–/p,q φ(x)φg.
Sinceφ(x)≤φ(x)≤,x∈[, ], we obtain
[n]p,q
Bp,q
n (f;x) –f(x)
–p
n–φ(x)
f
(x)≤Cf–g+ [n]–/
p,q φ(x)φg.
Also, the following inequality can be obtained:
[n]p,q
Bpn,q(f;x) –f(x)–p
n–φ(x)
f
(x)≤Cφ(x)f–g+ [n]–/
p,q φg.
Taking the infimum on the right-hand side of the above relations overg∈Wφ[, ], we get
[n]p,q
Bpn,q(f;x) –f(x)–p
n–φ(x)
f
(x)≤
CKφ(f;φ(x)[n]–/p,q ),
Cφ(x)Kφ(f; [n]–/p,q ).
(.)
5 Better approximation
In , King [] proposed a technique to obtain a better approximation for the well-known Bernstein operators as follows:
(Bnf)◦rn
(x) =
n
k=
f
k n
n k
rn(x)
k
–rn(x)
n–k
, (.)
where rnis a sequence of continuous functions defined on [, ] with ≤rn(x)≤ for
eachx∈[, ] andn∈ {, , . . .}. The modified Bernstein operators (.) preserveeand
e and present a degree of approximation at least as good. In [], the authors consider
the sequence of linear Bernstein-type operators defined forf ∈C[, ] byBn(f◦τ–)◦τ,τ
being any function that is continuously differentiable∞times on [, ], such thatτ() = ,
τ() = , andτ(x) > forx∈[, ].
So, using the technique proposed in [], we modify the (p,q)-Bernstein operators as
follows:
Bpn,q(f;x) =
n
k=
bpn,,qk(x)f◦τ–p
n–k[k] p,q
[n]p,q
,
where
bpn,q(x) =
n k
p,q
p[k(k–)–n(n–)]/τ(x)kτ(x)np–,qk.
Then we have
Bpn,q(e;x) = , B
p,q n
τ(t);x=τ(x),
Bpn,qτ(t);x= p
n–
[n]p,q
τ(x) +q[n– ]p,q [n]p,q
τ(x),
Bpn,qτ(t) –τ(x);x= p
n–
[n]p,q
φτ(x),
[image:9.595.112.485.286.738.2]whereφτ(x) :=τ(x)( –τ(x)).
Figure 3 Approximation process byBpn,q
Example . We compare the convergence of (p,q)-analog of Bernstein operatorsBpn,qf
with the modified operators Bpn,qf. We have considered the functionf(x) =sin(x) and
τ(x) =x+x. Forx∈[, ],p= .,q= .,n= , the convergence of the operatorsBpn,q
andBpn,qto the functionf is illustrated in Figure . Note that the approximation byBpn,qf
is better than using (p,q)-Bernstein operatorsBpn,qf.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Mathematics and RINS, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Korea.2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.3Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Str. Dr. I. Ratiu, No. 5-7, Sibiu, 550012, Romania.4Center for Advanced Studies in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan. 5Department of Mathematics, Dong-A University, Busan, 49315, Korea.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the editor and the referees for useful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the Dong-A University research fund.
Received: 26 February 2016 Accepted: 19 June 2016
References
1. Lupa¸s, A: Aq-analogue of the Bernstein operator. In: Seminar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus, vol. 9, pp. 85-92. University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca (1987)
2. Aral, A, Gupta, V, Agarwal, RP: Applications ofq-Calculus in Operator Theory. Springer, New York (2013) 3. Acu, AM: Stancu-Schurer-Kantorovich operators based onq-integers. Appl. Math. Comput.259, 896-907 (2015).
doi:10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.032
4. Acar, T, Aral, A: On pointwise convergence ofq-Bernstein operators and theirq-derivatives. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim.36(3), 287-304 (2015). doi:10.1080/01630563.2014.970646
5. Acu, AM, Muraru, CV: Approximation properties of bivariate extension ofq-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich operators. Results Math.67(3-4), 265-279 (2015). doi:10.1007/s00025-015-0441-7
6. Agratini, O: On aq-analogue of Stancu operators. Cent. Eur. J. Math.8(1), 191-198 (2010). doi:10.2478/s11533-009-0057-9
7. Kang, SM, Acu, AM, Rafiq, A, Kwun, YC: Approximation properties ofq-Kantorovich-Stancu operator. J. Inequal. Appl.
2015, 211 (2015). doi:10.1186/s13660-015-0729-x
8. Kang, SM, Acu, AM, Rafiq, A, Kwun, YC: Onq-analogue of Stancu-Schurer-Kantorovich operators based onq-Riemann integral. J. Comput. Anal. Appl.21(3), 564-577 (2016)
9. Ulusoy, G, Acar, T:q-Voronovskaya type theorems forq-Baskakov operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (2015). doi:10.1002/mma.3784
10. Burban, I: Two-parameter deformation of the oscillator algebra and (p,q)-analog of two-dimensional conformal field theory. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.2(3-4), 384-391 (1995). doi:10.2991/jnmp.1995.2.3-4.18
11. Sahai, V, Yadav, S: Representations of two parameter quantum algebras andp,q-special functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl.
335, 268-279 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.072
12. Mursaleen, M, Ansari, KJ, Khan, A: Erratum to ‘On (p,q)-analogue of Bernstein operators’ [Appl. Math. Comput. 266 (2015) 874-882]. Appl. Math. Comput.278, 70-71 (2016). doi:10.1016/j/amc.2015.04.090
13. Mursaleen, M, Nasiruzzaman, M, Khan, A, Ansari, KJ: Some approximation results on Bleimann-Butzer-Hahn operators defined by (p,q)-integers. Filomat30(3), 639-648 (2016). doi:10.2298/FIL1603639M
14. Acar, T: (p,q)-Generalization of Szász-Mirakyan operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (2015). doi:10.1002/mma.3721 15. Oru, H, Phillips, GM: A generalization of the Bernstein polynomials. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc.42, 403-413 (1999).
doi:10.1017/S0013091500020332
16. Ditzian, Z, Totik, V: Moduli of Smoothness. Springer, New York (1987)
17. Finta, Z: Remark on Voronovskaja theorem forq-Bernstein operators. Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai, Math.56(2), 335-339 (2011)
18. King, JP: Positive linear operators which preservex2. Acta Math. Hung.99, 203-208 (2003). doi:10.1023/A:1024571126455