• No results found

Head wall

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Head wall"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Reference Description Results 5.5.1 Design for Critical BM

ULS Design Inner face of wall

Design ULS Bending (BM ULS) 38kNm/m

Width of the section (b) 1000mm

Section Height 400mm

Concrete Cover 50mm

Main R.F Bar Diameter 12mm

spacing 150mm

Shear/ Secondary R.F Bar Diameter 10mm

Concrete Strength ( fcu) 30N/mm2

R.F Strength (fy) 460N/mm2

cl .5.8.4.1, Check for Minimm area of R.F

Part 4 , BS Effective Depth (d) 344 mm

5400 Provided R.F (As) 754 mm2

Min. R.F percentage 0.15%

Min. Area of R.F 516 mm2

As> Min. R.F, Hence Satisfactory eq.5, Part Lever Arm (z) calculation

4, BS 5400 The lever Arm of mm

the Section (z) =

cl.5.3.2.2 z = 331.28 mm

0.95 d = 326.8 mm

cl.5.3.2.2 value z is greater than 0.95d

Hence z = 326.80 mm

Ultimate Resistant (Mu ) calculation

eq. 1 Mu = ( 0.87fy) Asz

= 98.61 kNm

eq. 2 Mu= 0.15fcubd2

= 532.51 kNm

cl.5.3.2.3 Mu is taken as the lesser of eqn 1 and eqn2

Hence Mu = 98.61 kNm

Check for ULS bending Moment

Mu > BM ULS , Hence provided R.F adequate SLS DESIGN Servicible Moment = 22 kNm Moment ,Permanent loads, Mg = 19 kNm Moment , Live loads , Mq = 3kNm

{

1-1.1 fy As

}

d fcu bd

(2)

Section Height = 400 mm

Concrete Cover = 50 mm

Dist com. face to crack

point ,a' = 300 mm

Dia of Main Bar = 12 mm

E steel = 200 kNmm2

E concrete,short term = 28 kNmm2

(Table 3, part 4)

A steel,provided = 754 mm2

Max Bar Spacing = 150 mm

f y = 460 Nmm2

f cu = 30 Nmm2

Limitations

Allowable crack width = 0.25 mm Stress Limitation Factor, Concrete = 0.38 Stress Limitation Factor, Steel = 0.75 Effective depth d = 344 mm

cl.4.3.2.1.b, Econcrete,long term = 14 kNmm2

part 4 Modular ratio (α) = 14.29

Taking first moment of area about neutral axis :

x = 75.98 mm x =depth to N/A z = 318.67 mm z=lever arm

cl.4.1.1.3. Max steel stress ,fs = Ms/(As*z)

& Table 2 = 91.56 N/mm2

0.75 fy = 345 N/mm2

fs<Limiting stress of steel ,Hence Satisfactory

cl.4.1.1.3. Max Con. Stress, fcb = 1.82 N/mm2

& Table 2 0.38 fcu = 11.4 N/mm2

fcb<Limiting stress of concrete,Hence Satisfactory Єs=strain at R/F level

Єs = 0.000457813

Cl 5.8.8.2 Є1=strain at notional surface

Є1 = 0.000493684

Allow for stiffening effect of concrete Eqn 25

Hence T 16 @

(3)

provided as

Cl 5.8.8.2

a

cr = 87.60 mm main RF of the

inner face of

Eqn 24 Design crack width wing wall

W

= 0.0971335

Design crack width < Allowable crack width, Hence Satisfactory Inner face of wall secondary r/f

Design ULS Bending (BM ULS) 12kNm/m

Width of the section (b) 1000mm

Section Height 400mm

Concrete Cover 50mm

Main R.F Bar Diameter 12mm

spacing 150mm

Shear/ Secondary R.F Bar Diameter 10mm

Concrete Strength ( fcu) 30N/mm2

R.F Strength (fy) 460N/mm2

cl .5.8.4.1, Check for Minimm area of R.F

Part 4 , BS Effective Depth (d) 333 mm

5400 Provided R.F (As) 754 mm2

Min. R.F percentage 0.15%

Min. Area of R.F 499.5 mm2

As> Min. R.F, Hence Satisfactory eq.5, Part Lever Arm (z) calculation

4, BS 5400 The lever Arm of mm

the Section (z) =

cl.5.3.2.2 z = 320.28 mm

0.95 d = 316.35 mm

cl.5.3.2.2 value z is greater than 0.95d

Hence z = 316.35 mm

Ultimate Resistant (Mu ) calculation

eq. 1 Mu = ( 0.87fy) Asz

= 95.46 kNm

eq. 2 Mu= 0.15fcubd2

= 499.00 kNm

cl.5.3.2.3 Mu is taken as the lesser of eqn 1 and eqn2

Hence Mu = 95.46 kNm

Check for ULS bending Moment

Mu > BM ULS , Hence provided R.F adequate SLS DESIGN

{

1-1.1 fy As

}

d fcu bd

(4)

Servicible Moment = 8kNm Moment ,Permanent loads, Mg = 7kNm Moment , Live loads , Mq = 1kNm Section Height = 400 mm Concrete Cover = 50 mm

Dist com. face to crack

point ,a' = 300 mm

Dia of Main Bar = 12 mm

E steel = 200 kNmm2

E concrete,short term = 28 kNmm2

(Table 3, part 4)

A steel,provided = 754 mm2

Max Bar Spacing = 150 mm

f y = 460 Nmm2

f cu = 30 Nmm2

Limitations

Allowable crack width = 0.25 mm Stress Limitation Factor, Concrete = 0.38 Stress Limitation Factor, Steel = 0.75 Effective depth d = 333 mm

cl.4.3.2.1.b, Econcrete,long term = 14 kNmm2

part 4 Modular ratio (α) = 14.29

Taking first moment of area about neutral axis :

x = 74.61 mm x =depth to N/A z = 308.13 mm z=lever arm

cl.4.1.1.3. Max steel stress ,fs = Ms/(As*z)

& Table 2 = 34.43 N/mm2

0.75 fy = 345 N/mm2

fs<Limiting stress of steel ,Hence Satisfactory

cl.4.1.1.3. Max Con. Stress, fcb = 0.70 N/mm2

& Table 2 0.38 fcu = 11.4 N/mm2

fcb<Limiting stress of concrete,Hence Satisfactory Єs=strain at R/F level

Єs = 0.000172173

(5)

Є1 = 0.000193495 Allow for stiffening effect of concrete

Eqn 25 Hence T 12 @ Єm = 0.000193495 150 mm c/c provided as Cl 5.8.8.2

a

cr = 87.60 mm main RF of the inner face of

Eqn 24 Design crack width wing wall

W

= 0.0381291 Hence T 10 @

Design crack width < Allowable crack width, Hence Satisfactory 150 mm c/c provided as distribution rf of the wall

Hence T 10 @

Cl 5.8.4.2 Min area of main reinforcement in compression face = 0.12% of Area 150mm c/c

Minimum reinforcement area = 412.8 mm2/m provided as

Distribution reinforcement = 10 mm bars @ main RF of the

Cl 7.5.9 150 c/c ( 471.2 mm2) outer face of

wing wall

Cl 5.8.4.2 Minimum area of secondary reinforcement = 0.12% of Area Minimum reinforcement area = 412.8 mm2/m

Cl 7.5.9 Distribution reinforcement = 10 mm bars @ Hence T 10 @

150 c/c ( 471.2 mm2) 150 mm c/c provided as distribution rf of the wall

5.2.3 Check for ULS Shear

ULS Shear Force = 54 KN/m Methodology

cl 5.4.1 The shear forces in a slab may be obtained from general elastic Cl

5.3.3.1,Part Shear Stress is checked against the maximum allowable stress of 0.75√fcu or 4, BS 54000 analysis 4.75N/mm2 , whichever is lesser

cl.5.4..4.1 If the Shear stress is less than ξsvc as per cl.5.3.3, then it is considered as no addditonal r.f is required

cl.5.3.3.3 shear enhancement is allowed for section within distance av<2d

ULS Shear Force = 54 KN/m

ULS Shear Stress = 0.135N/mm2

Section Height = 400 mm

(6)

Concrete Strength

(f cu ) = 30 N/mm2

Main Bar Dia. = 12 mm

R.F Area (As ) = 754 mm2

Disribution Bar Dia. ( if

out side of Main Bar) = 10 mm

Shear Enhancement = No

av = 2.5 mm

Effective Depth (d) = 344

Shear Stress (v) = V/bd

= 0.157 N/mm2

cl. 5.3.3.1 Limiting Shear stress = 4.75 N/mm2 v< Limiting shear stress, Hence Satisfactory

Table 9 Depth Facotor (ξs) = 1.10

Table 8 vc = 0.405 N/mm2

ξsvc = 0.444 N/mm2

shear enhancement Checking

(2d/av ) = 1 against Shear

Resisisting S.S = 0.444 N/mm2 Satisfied,

ResisistingS.S< LimitingS.S. Yes Section is O.K

Hence resisting S.S 0.444 N/mm2

Is resisiting S.S> v Yes Satisfactory Against Shear

References

Related documents

Here we report the results of a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial (IUNO) that was conducted as a postapproval commitment study, to prospectively determine the relative

In our paper, due to the assumption of local stationarity and a parameterization of the drift term, we can generalize the estimation method used in Aït-Sahalia to the

Taking into account the costs of deploym ent, hardw are, softw are, installation, m aintenance and ongoing support, they projected that for otherw ise-identical

Because of increasing call volumes in the Client Services call center, CI Investments decided in 2000 to integrate their existing Nortel phone environment with a

• Retirement benefits are not to exceed 80% coverage of the final gross annual salary, reckoning on 40 years of service; social security pension is integrated at an estimated 50%

SUMMARY: This notice solicits additional comment on a new system of records for the Office of General Counsel (OGC) E- Discovery Management System (EDMS).. EDMS

Abstract — This paper presents a new application of the Integrated Services Digital Broadcasting - Terrestrial version B (ISDB-T B ) digital television system to

Policy discussions about the potential of advanced ICTs often presume that access to digital technologies will provide a foundation for electronic commerce and that this will