• No results found

Loadout Analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Loadout Analysis"

Copied!
30
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

LOADOUT ANALYSIS

AN OVERVIEW OF LOADOUT OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS.

PRESENTED BY

(2)

Topics for Discussion

What is Loadout and Loadout Analysis?

Why Loadout?

Type of Loadout

Importance of Loadout analysis.

Components used for Loadout

Loads

Loadout Procedure

Analysis.

Post processing

Practical

(3)

Objectives

To highlight the purpose of Loadout and

component used for Loadout.

To give an overview into the various criteria

considered in Loadout Analysis and to

interprete results.

(4)

What is Loadout and Loadout Analysis?

By loadout, we mean the process of moving a

structure from a set of skidways, crane on the land to a cargo barge.

Loadout Analysis is the analysis performed to determine the state of stress in the structural

member when loading out as a result of loss of one or more support and also to determine the best

approach to loadout considering safety

Normally, the barge is placed some fixed distance

(5)

 away from the land skidway and the structure is

skidded along the land skid. At some point, part of the structure will cantilever over the gap between the barge and the land. The structure is moved further until part of it is over the barge.

 At this time, the barge ballast is changed so that

the barge partially supports the structure. Now, the structure is skidded further off of the land and onto the barge. Throughout this process two things are important:

(6)

 The ballast in the barge, and  The stresses in the structure.

These two things are intimately related . Even if

the structure is completely on the barge, it is possible to ballast the barge so that the

structure becomes overstressed .

 Loadout Analysis is the analysis performed to

determine the state of stress in the structural member when loading out as a result of loss of one or more support and also to determine the best approach to Loadout considering safety.

(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)

Why Loadout?

Aid installation of offshore structures such as

jackets, topsides, decks, modules, etc.

Convenience in installation, cost–effective and

clean.

The structure of the vessel has to be investigated

to find out constraints affecting the integration of

the structure during such load-outs and explore

ways to improve and optimize it.

(14)

Loadout Methods

Loadout by Skidding

- Where the structure is

lifted onto the barge by means of skid beams

from the fabrication yard onto the barge.

Loadout by Trailer

-Where the structure is lifted

onto the barge by means of Self Propelled

Modular Trailers(SPMT)

Lifted Loadout

-Where the structure is lifted onto

(15)

Importance of Loadout Analysis

To assess and design the structure for

installation stresses.

Provides a better idea of structural layout in

terms of weight distribution and overall weight

control.

Loadout—on many occasions—is known to be

one of the critical pre–service conditions in

terms of member and joint stresses.

(16)

Importance of Loadout Analysis Contd?

To capture changes in layout post-design stage

tolerances.

To capture fabrication tolerances in terms of

(17)

Some of the Component for Loadout;

Skid rail or Skid beam

Padears/ Padeyes

Slings

Shackles

Spreader Bars

Cranes

Winches

Jack.

Pulling Cable

(18)

Loads

All dry weights are considered with proper

contingencies (Contingencies are those multiplying

factors that capture the non-modeled items in a

(19)

Dry Loads considered are:

Self weight

Non modeled dead loads

Architectural dry loads ( if any) .

Equipment dry loads.

Piping dry loads

Electrical and instrument dry loads

etc

(20)

Loadout Procedure

Procedures:

The load-out procedure shall also be submitted to COMPANY's approval at least one month prior to load-out. In particular, this procedure shall define:

• The method selected for loading • The mooring system of the barge

• The draft of barge when fully loaded

• The water depth and the pier configuration • The current and wind conditions

• The material and equipment planned to be used

• The loading scenario, back up equipment and contingency plan • The calculation note to demonstrate the acceptability of loads generated in the barge structure, and any corresponding

(21)

Loadout Procedure-Cont’d

• The behaviour of the cargo barge shall be considered for one (or more) sudden mistake during loading (mechanical break down of ballast pump, free surface effect during

ballasting, etc.)

• The procedure shall show any additional reinforcement or modification of the barge (surelevation of manholes,

(22)

Analysis

There are different known methods of loadout analysis that are actively performed by design engineers. These are based on individual company’s specification. An

example is the one given below:

 The variation of the calculated location of the centre of

gravity within a rectangle whose sides are equal to 5 % of the overall width and length for the jacket and 10 % of the overall width and length, but not less than within a 2 m x 2 m square area, for a deck.

 The weight contingencies to be applied to derive the

loaded weights shall be as follows:

(23)

Analysis Cont’d

report is the reference for the load cases (maximum expected weight)

• A contingency equal to the weighing precision with a minimum of 3 % if a weighed weight is the reference for the load-cases.

Whenever the results of a weighing (if any) would show a weighed weight greater than the maximum expected weight and/or an excessive COG shift, the loading-out calculations shall be revised to consider the weighed weight and COG, and the structures

(24)

Analysis Cont’d (TOTAL)

 Normal case: a vertical displacement equal to ±

30 mm shall be imposed to each structure support points. These elementary support point

deflections shall then be combined to cover any situation that can be met during load-out. The

member stresses resulting from this analysis shall be compared to basic allowable stresses without 1/3 increase.

 • Extreme case: each structure support shall be

successively released (no support) or a maximum displacement of ± 60 mm shall be applied (three

(25)

Analysis Cont’d

 ANOTHER EXAMPLE: (CHEVRON)

 Normal case: a vertical displacement e.g equal

to ± 30 mm shall be imposed to each structure support points. These elementary support point deflections shall then be combined to cover any situation that can be met during load-out. The member stresses resulting from this analysis shall be compared to basic allowable stresses without 1/3 increase.

 • Extreme case: each structure support shall be

(26)

Analysis Cont’d

 maximum displacement e.g of ± 60 mm shall be

applied (two adjacent supports for a four point

Loadout arrangement and one row unsupported for a multipoint load-out arrangement); the member

stresses resulting from this analysis shall be

compared to the basic allowable stresses with 1/3 increase.

(27)

Analysis Cont’d-Skew Method(Pulling)

 Another Method is the Skew Method where it is

assumed that 75% of the Pulling load is rested on one leg and the remaining 25% on the other leg.

 The pulling load is load = vertical load or gravity

load x 0.75(or 0.25) x 0.3

 *Steel to Steel 0.3(max. typical friction factor -

(28)

Post Processing

Check and ensure that displacement forces

are applied as defined by the specification

being used.

Perform code check for primary and

secondary members appropriately as stated in

API RP-2A

(29)
(30)

References

Related documents

Allowable Stresses for Master Plank ® LVL 2,3,4, 5 (Allowable Stress Design).. Limit States Design using Master Plank ® LVL shall be in accordance with CAN/CSA-O86-01. The

Analysis carried out on the initial layout showed that the stresses due to sustained loads were well within the allowable limit (i.e. The stresses for thermal loading conditions

As we can see from the comparison graph of different materials (allowable stresses v/s thickness of the pipe), as the allowable stress value increases the thickness value

For Trapezoidal cross section, Maximum moment is in top horizontal member as 131 kN.m (Sagging) and support moment as 133 kN.m ( negative). In case of Bending stresses due to

In theoretical analysis to calculated stresses in the frame member, the frame is treated as truss like structure and the stresses in various members of frame like top tube,

encountered in pipelines are predictable and can therefore be associated with higher allowable stress limits. To achieve higher allowable stresses and prevent

Using Sustained stress cases is preferable to Operating stress cases as CAESAR will highlight any stresses in excess of the allowable stresses.. Occasional load cases should be

The sum of longitudinal stresses due to pressure, weight and those produced by occasional loads (such as wind, earthquake) may exceed the basic material