• No results found

Tank Foundation & Ring Beam Design

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Tank Foundation & Ring Beam Design"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Design of foundation for tank 1301B08, 1301B11, 1303B02, 1803B12

Design Data

1 Dia of tank d = 3.6m

2 Height of tank H = 3.2m

3 Cone height H1 = 0.5m

Calculation of wind velocity as per IS 875 (P3-1987)

4 Basic wind speed Vb = 44m/s

5 Risk Coefficient k1 = 1

6 Terrain, ht, stru. Size Coefficient

as per Class B, terrain category 2 k2 = 0.98

7 Topography Factor k3 = 1

Design Wind Speed Vz = 43.12 m/s

= 156 km/hr

8 Designwind pr 1115.601

9 Inward drag associated with open tank

as per cl. 3.9.7.1(a)- API 650 = 240

10 Total external Pressure P = 1355.601

As per cl. 3.9.7.1(a)- API 650 formula for for max. ht. of unstiffened shell is based on total Equivalent wind velocity corresponding to wind pr. Of 1355.601 N/m2 is calculated by

11 V = 142.0436 km/hr

As a conservative consideration design wind vel. = 156 km/hr 12 wind load on cylindrical shell/m2

of projected area = 83.33716

13 Projected area of shell = D*H = 11.52

14 Wind load on shell = 960.044 Kg

15 Wind moment due to shell MWs = 1536.07 Kgm 16

of projected area = 69.77064

17 Projected area of cone roof = 0.9

18 wind load on cone roof = 62.79358 Kg

19 C.G. of cone roof from bottom = 3.366667 m 20 Wind moment due to cone roof MWr = 211.405 Kgm

21 Total overturning moment due to wind M = 1.748 Tm N/m2 N/m2 N/m2 external pressure of 1720 N/m2 which is result of wind velocity of 160km/hr.

Kg/m2 m2

wind load on cone roof/m2

Kg/m2 m2

(2)

Calculation of seismic force as per IS 1893 (1984)

22 b = 1

23 I = 1.5

24 = 0.04for Zone III

25 Horizontal Coefficient = 0.06

26 Empty wt. of tank = 4.5T

27 Total operating wt. = 37.5T

28 Seismic Lateral force

a) when tank is empty = 0.27 T

b) when tank is full = 2.25 T

29 Overturning moment due to earthquake

a) when tank is empty = 0.432 Tm

b) when tank is full = 3.60 Tm

Design Data for Ring Beam

1 Grade of concrete = M25

2 Grade of steel = Fe500

3 Dia of tank d = 3.6m

4

Coefficient of soil pressure at rest

u = 0.4

5 Density of liquid store = 10

6 Density of earth considered = 18

7 Angle of repose  = 30degree

8 Coefficient of active earth pressure Ka = 0.33 9 Net safe bearing capacity of soil = 50

10 Self weight of tank = 45 kN

11 Self weight of liquid store = 330 kN

12 Inner dia of ring wall = 3.3m

13 Outer dia of ring wall = 3.9m

15 Dia of foundation = 5.7m

16 Horizontal Shear at top of ring beam

a) Due to wind force = 10.228 kN

b) Due to earthquake force = 22.5 kN

17 Overturning Moment at top of ring beam

a) Due to wind = 17.48 kNm b) Due to earthquake = 36.00 kNm ao ah kN/m3 kN/m3 kN/m2

(3)

300mm 3300mm 300mm 96 5m m DP= 15 50 m m DF= 900mm 45 0 5700mm

Design of ring wall

loading Data

Seismic moment when tank empty = 4.32 kNm

No. of basic loading cases = 4

Loads At tank bottom

Load case Description of load vertical Load KN Horizontal load KN Moment KN.m

1 Empty Wt. of tank 45 0 0

2 Operating Wt. of tank 375 0 0

3 Seismic Load when 0 22.5 36

tank full

4 Seismic Load when 0 2.7 4.32

tank empty

Load combination for stability check 101 = Load case 2 102 = Load case 1+4 103 = Load case 2+3 Load combination for design 201 = (Load case 2)*1.5

202 = (Load case 1)*0.9+(4)*1.5 203 = (Load case 2)*0.9+(3)*1.6

(4)

Combation of loads for stability check: Loads At top of Ring Beam

Load case vertical Load KN Horizontal load KN Moment KN.m

101 375 0 0

102 45 2.7 4.32

103 375 22.5 36

Weight of ring wall Wrb = 213.33 kN

Weight of sand mat Ws = 387.1937 kN

Loads At botton of Ring Beam

Load case vertical Load KN Horizontal load KN Overturning Moment KN.m

101 975.52 0 0

102 645.52 2.7 11.1105

103 975.52 22.5 92.5875

Calculation of Resisting Moment at bottom of Ring Beam Loads At botton of Ring Beam

Load case vertical Load KN Resisting Moment KN.m

101 975.52 977.32353

102 645.52 647.32353

103 975.52 977.32353

Check for Stability Check for Overturning

Overturning Safety Factor = Resisting Moment overturning Moment Load case Overturning safety factor Check

101 #DIV/0! >1.5 hence safe

102 58.26 >1.5 hence safe

103 10.56 >1.5 hence safe

Check for sliding

Sliding Safety Factor = u*Vertical Load

(5)

Load case sliding safety factor Check

101 #DIV/0! >1.5 hence safe

102 95.63 >1.5 hence safe

103 17.34 >1.5 hence safe

Check for crushing strength of concrete

Pmax/Pmin = P + M

A Z

where A= Area of Ring beam = 3.39292

where Z= section modulus of Ring beam = 2.295522 Pmax shouldnot be greater than crushing strengh of Concrete = 25 N/mm2 Pmin shouldnot be less than 0

Load case Pmax (N/mm2) Check Pmin (N/mm2) Check 101 0.29 <25N/mm2 hence safe 0.29 >0 hence safe 102 0.20 <25N/mm2 hence safe 0.19 >0 hence safe 103 0.33 <25N/mm2 hence safe 0.25 >0 hence safe Calculation of Reinforcement of Ring beam

Ring beam should be design for case for which factored load at top of ring beam is maximum. Loads At top of Ring Beam

Load case vertical Load KN 201 562.5 202 40.5 203 337.5 Pu Pu Tu qu1 qu2 m2 m3

(6)

Hoop tension on ring beam due to vertical load qu1 = 21.92217 Hoop tension at ring beam botton due to sand qu2 = 22.635 Avg Hoop tension on ring beam /m

Pu=(qu1+(qu1+qu2))*Dp+Df/2 Pu = 83.59777 kN/m Direct tension on ring beam /m Tu = 137.9363 kN Ast req. for ring beam = Tu/0.87*fy Ast = 317.095

ptmin = 0.2%

Astmin = 1509

use 12dia. Bar

cover = 40mm

d1 = 2423 mm

spacing of bar = 181.6003 mm

Provide 12 mm dia. @ 150 mm C/C as a main reinforcement

Calculation of shear reinforcement

use 8dia. Bar

spacing = 364.4247 mm

Provide 2 legged 8 mm dia. @ 200 mm C/C as a shear reinforcement

Load calculations for Base Slab

Total load coming on the top of foundation = 375 kN

Weight of ring wall = 213.33 kN

Weight of soil = 387.19 kN

Self weight of foundation = 287.07 kN

Total weight of foundation = 1262.60 kN

A Total weight coming on the foundation P = 1262.60 kN B Moment at base of ring beam M = 102.7125 kNm

c Gross pressure at base G = 50

Checking of base pressure A Check for max. Gross Pressure

Maximum pressure coming = P

A = 1262.60

25.51759

= 49.48 <Gross pr. of soil so safe

Calculation of Ast at top

Base slab is designed for max. pressure of 50KN/m2 for simlicity

Maximum Factored B.M. at face of ring beam = 30.375 kNm kN/m2 kN/m2 mm2 mm2 kN/m2 kN/m2

(7)

Depth required d = 93.83 mm

Depth provided = 394 mm O.K.

Area of steel required Ast = 788.00

Provide 16 mm dia bar @ spacing = 255.1547 mm C/C Provide 16 mm dia @200 mmC/C

Calculation of Ast at bottom

Pr. From bottom = 49.48

Pr. From top due to tank wt. & internal soil wt. = 100.36

Balance pr. = 50.88

Maximum Factored B.M. at centre of raft = 103.9006 kNm

Area of steel required Ast = 788.00

Provide 16 mm dia bar @ spacing = 255.1547 mm C/C Provide 16 mm dia @200 mmC/C

Check for punching shear

Perimeter = 13.49 m

Area of resisting shear = 25.13931

Shear force = 3784.635 KN Tv = 0.712059 Bc = 1 Ks = 1 Tc = 1.25 O.K. mm2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 mm2 m2 N/mm2 N/mm2

(8)

Concrete Grade

pt

M15

M20

M25

M30

M35

M40 & above

0.15

0.28

0.28

0.29

0.29

0.29

0.3

0.25

0.35

0.36

0.36

0.37

0.37

0.38

0.5

0.46

0.48

0.49

0.5

0.5

0.51

0.75

0.54

0.56

0.57

0.59

0.59

0.6

1

0.6

0.62

0.64

0.66

0.67

0.68

1.25

0.64

0.67

0.7

0.71

0.73

0.74

1.5

0.68

0.72

0.74

0.76

0.78

0.79

1.75

0.71

0.75

0.78

0.8

0.82

0.84

2

0.71

0.79

0.82

0.84

0.86

0.88

2.25

0.71

0.81

0.85

0.88

0.9

0.92

2.5

0.71

0.82

0.88

0.91

0.93

0.95

2.75

0.71

0.82

0.9

0.94

0.96

0.98

3

0.71

0.82

0.92

0.96

0.99

1.01

0.15

0.29

0.25

0.36

0.1

0.07

#VALUE!

References

Related documents

credentialing exams, including the Praxis II: School Guidance and Counseling exam, the National Certified School Counselor Examination (NCSCE), the National Certified Counselor

completion of the full proposal, posted dates of CSCU-AC, BOR-ASA, and BOR meetings, desired initiation date for the program, and any necessary lead time required by federal or

In reference to this turn of events, the inter- viewee noted that the 3D digital woolly mam- moth skeleton had become a source that “maybe takes on this new kind of, for lack of

A lot of recent research had been focussed on the control of Onion Smut in the region, where losses of onions to smut can be in excess of 70% if chemical controls (seed treatment or

Gathered within the dominant narrative, moreover, some evidence has helped to substantiate policy commit- ments to expand bioenergy, alongside specific priorities for

Knowledge, understanding and reasoning ability and application, particularly in the field of construction and infrastructures, models for sustainability assessment based on

As shown in Figure 7 A, Ck2-ASO treatment at 17  C led to a 23% reduction of diet- induced body weight gain as compared to control mice at 22  C, whereas CK2-ASO or mild cold

• Network 1 &amp; 2 are IntServ capable and core network supports DiffServ • End-to-end RSVP messages flow between network 1 &amp; 2. • Aggregate RSVP messages flow between edge