• No results found

The Making Choices Program: Social Problem- Solving Skills for Children

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The Making Choices Program: Social Problem- Solving Skills for Children"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The Making Choices Program: Social Problem- Solving Skills for Children

Mark W. Fraser James K. Nash

Maeda J. Galinsky Kathleen M. Darwin

University of North Carolina School of Social Work

Chapel Hill, NC 27599

The development of the Making Choices program was funded, in part, by grants and contracts from the North Carolina State Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services, the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, the Injury Prevention Research Center of the UNC at Chapel Hill, the Governor’s Crime Commission, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse

(2)

What Is Aggressive Behavior?

A persistent pattern of behavior that causes or threatens harm to other people.

¯Violates the basic rights of others;

¯Violates major age-appropriate societal norms or rules; or

¯Causes impairment in social or academic functioning.

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(3)

Elements of Aggressive Behavior

• Verbal – taunts, threats

• Physical – tantrums, throwing, fights

• Instrumental – goal directed

• Reactive – unplanned retaliation

• Proactive – bullying, provocation

• Overt – externalized

• Covert – lying, stealing, cheating, drug use

• Indirect or Relational – social manipulation

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(4)

Why Focus on Aggressive Behavior?

Aggressive behavior in childhood:

± Often has lasting effects on social development;

± Is relatively stable for children who become aggressive at an early age;

± Is relatively stable across generations;

± Consumes a disproportionate share of resources; and

± (If untreated,) Has a poor prognosis. It is a major precursor of violent behavior.

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(5)

Where to Start? Ecological Perspective

Family Factors

School Factors Peer Factors

Neighborhood and Societal Factors Individual

Factors

Conduct Problems

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(6)

Biological Risks Parenting

Family-School

Pre-School Climate Neighborhood

School Readiness Processing Skills Parenting

Family-School School Climate Neighborhood

Peer Rejection Academic Failure Parenting

Family-School School Climate Neighborhood

Increasingly Broad Repertoire of Potentially Damaging and

Aggressive Behaviors

Cascades of Risk: No Single Pathway

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(7)

Intervention Model for Working with Conduct Problems in Childhood

Fraser, M., Nash, J., Galinsky, M., Darwin, K. (2001). Making choices: Social problem-solving skills for children.

Washington, D.C.: NASW Press.

“The guide is reader friendly…[and]…

use of contemporary references--

including entertainers, sports figures, video games--helps this text achieve its basic purpose: to get kids to stop and think before acting”

Social Work Today, February 18, 2002

(8)

Making Choices:

A Social Development Program

Developing culturally relevant resources for practitioners, teachers, and others

ƒ Focus on proximal outcomes as indicators of distal outcomes

ƒ Constant re-invention and refinement

ƒ Fidelity-focused delivery

· Community involvement

· Research-based, highly specified manuals

· Clinical support

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(9)

Focus on Relational Factors:

Interrupt Early Start Risk Process

• Rejection by prosocial peers

.

• Poor relationships with teachers

• Few opportunities for prosocial

involvement

• Association with rejected peers

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(10)

How to Strengthen Prosocial Relationships?

It wasn’t me…

Copyright 2000 JP Getty Trust, All rights reserved

With teachers….

With peers…

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(11)

The Relational Risk Chain

n Coupled – perhaps – with high biological risk (e.g.

low social conditionability and low behavioral

inhibition), child has early exposure to violence, abuse, neglect, and coercion

o Child imitates aversive behavior and earns attention with aversive behavior

Stressed, busy parents (or parents impaired by drug use) acquiesce and the child’s aversive behaviors are rewarded/accelerated

Peers and teachers begin to reject child

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(12)

The Relational Risk Chain (cont.)

Child outcomes include: lower

cooperative participation, school liking, and achievement; higher inattention,

hostile attribution, and misconduct

Rejection and withdrawal lead to limited prosocial opportunities; increased

opportunities for drug use, exposure to alternative values and beliefs

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(13)

Making Choices:

Solving Social Problems

ƒ Social information processing skills

ƒ Emotion regulation (understanding feelings,

arousal; self-talk and other techniques to control impulsive behavior)

ƒ Opportunities for involvement with prosocial peers

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(14)

The Problem-Solving Sequence:

Integrating SIP with Emotion Regulation

State the

problem

Generate potential solutions Evaluate

potential solutions Select &

enact the best solution(s) Assess

outcomes Encode

social cues

Interpret social cues

Arousal, Emotions, Social Knowledge

Set goal(s)

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(15)

Making Choices Program Skills for Solving Social Problems

ENACTMENT RESPONSE DECISION RESPONSE SEARCH

GOAL FORMULATION

INTERPRETATION ENCODING

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(16)

•Learning with and from peers -- FUN

•Having students generate examples and ideas for role play activities

•Learning entire sequence of skills

•Reviewing material and practicing skills from earlier lessons

•Tailoring content

Making Choices

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(17)

Making Choices Program:

Basic Elements

ƒ Mixed group or classroom format

ƒ Guided group or classroom process

ƒ Social learning model

• Teaching skills

• Supervised practice

• In vivo replication

ƒ 7 Units, 29 lessons (approx.. 1 hr/week for academic year)

Making Choices

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(18)

Unit 3:

INTERPRETATION

Lesson 1: Recognizing Others’ Intentions Lesson 2: Distinguishing Friendly versus

Hostile Intentions

Lesson 3: Distinguishing Intentional versus Unintentional Behavior

Lesson 4: Situations, Meanings, and Problems

Making Choices

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(19)

19

Sample Lesson 3: Distinguishing Intentional versus Unintentional Behavior

13th lesson of series

Content already covered includes

recognizing and identifying emotions and feelings

managing feelingsself talk

identifying social cues

distinguishing friendly vs hostile intentions

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(20)

20

Distinguishing Intentional versus Unintentional Behavior

Goals: improve ability to use situational cues to distinguish intentional from

unintentional behavior, and improve ability to encode a larger number of situational cues

First step: review and remind of content covered in prior lessons, with emphasis on ways to distinguish friendly from

hostile intention

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(21)

21

Distinguishing Intentional versus Unintentional Behavior

Activities: 1. Discussion

“Why is it important to be able to identify intentional or unintentional behavior?”

Ensure that students discuss

helps one understand the situation better

helps one decide what to do next

Emphasize that unintentional actions are usually not hostile

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(22)

22

Distinguishing Intentional versus Unintentional Behavior

Activities: 2. Detective Game

Purpose: to help students learn how to pay attention to all the clues in a situation and consider them before making a decisionTasks:

Leader reads a simple story where character has unclear motivation(e.g. John is standing next to Tom’s broken bike)

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(23)

23

Distinguishing Intentional versus Unintentional Behavior

• Tasks (continued)

Leader reads follow up facts one by one (e.g.

John’s bike is on the ground, broken; John has a scraped knee and elbow). Facts can be relevant or irrelevant.

Students each place a card face down that says

“By Accident”, “On Purpose to be Mean”, “On Purpose to be Friendly”, or “Can’t Tell” when they have made a decision.

Students cannot change their card once they have made their decision.

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(24)

24

Distinguishing Intentional versus Unintentional Behavior

Activities: 3. Discussion

After game is over, points to emphasize include

it’s important to pay attention to lots/all the clues

some clues are more important than others

there are different kinds of clues

deciding too quickly can lead to mistakes

figuring out others intentions can help us decide what to do next

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(25)

25

Final Activity

Using the theory and principles behind Making Choices, develop another lesson activity to teach the skill of distinguishing intentional versus unintentional behavior.

How might you need to vary this for children of different ages or with cultural differences?

Demonstrate/role play the lesson

Feedback

Copyright 2002 Research to Teaching UNC SSW Fraser, Nash, Galinsky, Darwin

(26)

Selected References

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101.

Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1998).

Multiple risk factors in the development of externalizing behavior problems: Group and individual differences. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 469-493.

Fraser, M. W. (Ed.) (2002). Risk and resilience in childhood.

Washington, DC: NASW Press.

Greenwood, P. W., Model. K. E., Rydell, C. P., & Chiesa, J. (1996).

Diverting children from a life of crime. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

Kelley, B. T., Loeber, R., Keenan, K., & DeLamatre, M. (1998).

Developmental pathways in boys’ disruptive and delinquent behavior.

Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs. Available at:

http://www.ncjrs.org/jjgen.htm#165692

References

Related documents

Competencies and Attributes: Financial management, problem solving and decision making skills.. Plan, organize, lead

Figure 2 demonstrates how iNSITE provides orders of magnitude more visibility, situational awareness, and capability to defend a computer network of any size or complexity,

generally and unconditionally authorised, (in substitution of any authorities previously granted to the Directors), pursuant to and in accordance with Section 551 of the Companies

Semantic digital libraries cannot stand without technologies and combine many semantic tools solutions, such as semantic integration of information based on different

When the door synchronization switch of a reception desk personal light is a door position, it will turn it off automatically in about 20 minutes in the state of reception desk

Management skills overlap with leadership skills, as both involve problem-solving, decision-making, planning, delegation, communication, and time management.. Good

Fine motor skills Social skills Language skills Collaborative skills Investigative/exploration Making choices/decisions Experimenting?.