14-Feb06

(1)

UNORTHODOX

OPENINGS

NEWSLETTER

UON #

14

14 “

“

D

e

di

ca

te

d to

ga

mb

it

e

rs and

pla

ye

rs of th

e

unorth

odox.

”

Senior Editor

Davide Rozzoni

Associate Editor

Gary K. Gifford

Jan / Feb/

(2)

(3)

Senior Editor:

Davide Rozzoni

Davide Rozzoni [email protected]@libero.it

Associate Editor:

Gary K. Gifford

Gary K. Gifford [email protected]@yahoo.com

Contributors to UON 14

Mike Adams, Acmercury, G. K. Gifford, Orest Vovk,

Mike Adams, Acmercury, G. K. Gifford, Orest Vovk, Davide Rozzoni, Dany Senechaud,Davide Rozzoni, Dany Senechaud, Tim Sawy

Tim Sawyer, Clyde Nakaer, Clyde Nakamura, mura, Tim Sanders; Tim Sanders; Antonio Garcia, Antonio Garcia, Gambit GrunGambit Grundy,dy,

Robert, Colin

Robert, Colin Brockley, GBrockley, Glenn Glenn Giffen, iffen, and Correand Correspondance spondance Master Master Giorgio Giorgio CodazzaCodazza

A Word About the Articles and Graphics in this Issue . . .

Several articles were created from e-mails, but have been edited and, in most cases, graphics Several articles were created from e-mails, but have been edited and, in most cases, graphics and/or diagrams

and/or diagrams have been have been added. added. Permission from Permission from the authors has the authors has been obtained. been obtained. In a In a fewfew cases the authors desired to use pennames and/or e-mail names instead of their birth names. cases the authors desired to use pennames and/or e-mail names instead of their birth names. The Eiffel Tower image was not a part of the original Dany Senechaud article, but was added by The Eiffel Tower image was not a part of the original Dany Senechaud article, but was added by the associate editor.

the associate editor.

The views and opinions expressed in the articles, including book reviews, are of the respective The views and opinions expressed in the articles, including book reviews, are of the respective authors and are not necessarily shared by the editors and other UON members.

authors and are not necessarily shared by the editors and other UON members.

Care has been taken to avoid misspellings and typographical errors, but their presence remains Care has been taken to avoid misspellings and typographical errors, but their presence remains possible.

possible. Significant errors, if prSignificant errors, if present, will be stated in anesent, will be stated in anerrataerrata_{in a subsequent issue of}_{in a subsequent issue of}

UON. UON.

IMPORTANT

IMPORTANT : : UON 15 and futuUON 15 and future UONs will be availabre UONs will be available for upload fromle for upload from [email protected]

[email protected] In order to receive those issues you In order to receive those issues you need to be aneed to be a subscriber to the new list.

subscriber to the new list. If you aren’t already you can be by sending an e-mIf you aren’t already you can be by sending an e-mail message toail message to [email protected]

[email protected] . . The UCO list The UCO list will no longer will no longer host newhost new UONs as there is not e

UONs as there is not enough room at the files’ site. nough room at the files’ site. The new UON list will The new UON list will not generate e-mailnot generate e-mail messages, except for UON-related messages from Gar

messages, except for UON-related messages from Gary Gifford. y Gifford. Subscription to the nSubscription to the new groupew group listing is free.

listing is free.

UON 14

UON 14 © Jan. 2006 by Davide Rozzoni and Gary K. Gifford © Jan. 2006 by Davide Rozzoni and Gary K. Gifford

Cover Art:

Please forward UON comments, games, and article submissions to

(4)

Contents of UON 14

1

1 David David Brine Brine PritchardPritchardby G.K.Giffordby G.K.Gifford

Tribute to David Pritchard

Tribute to David Pritchard by Mike Adamsby Mike Adams

3 3 2

2 A A Letter Letter from from Davide Davide RozzoniRozzoni 44 3

3 A A Note Note from from GKGGKG 44 4

4 Book Review :Book Review : The Hippopotamus Rises – The Hippopotamus Rises –The Re-emergence of a ChessThe Re-emergence of a Chess Opening, by IM Andrew Martin

Opening, by IM Andrew Martin (Review by Davide Rozzoni)(Review by Davide Rozzoni)

5 5 5

5 Hippopotamus Hippopotamus Games,Games,compiled by Davide Rozzonicompiled by Davide Rozzoni 55

White

White Hippo Hippo Games Games ––by Acmercuryby Acmercury 88

6

6 My My Crumbling Crumbling Stonewall Stonewall Attack Attack against against Alex Alex ShabalovShabalov – G. K. Giff – G. K. Giffordord 1111

7

7 GROB GROB 1. 1. g4 g4 ?! ?! Adventures Adventures ––

Part 1. Introduction to the

Part 1. Introduction to the GrobGrobby Vovk (edited by David by Vovk (edited by David Rozzoni)Rozzoni)

Part 2. Grob Games

Part 2. Grob Games, compiled by David Rozzoni, compiled by David Rozzoni

14 14 8

8 Gambits Gambits from from FranceFrance – Dany Senecha – Dany Senechaudud 1818

9

9 Shaviliuk Shaviliuk GambitGambit – Tim Sawyer – Tim Sawyer 2828

10

10 Two Two Games Games ffrom ffrom the the 2005 2005 BDO BDO Chess Chess Tournament,Tournament,by Robertby Robert 3030

11 Nimzo-Larsen

11 Nimzo-Larsen – Tim Sanders – Tim Sanders 3131

12

12 Owen Owen DefenseDefense – Tim Sanders – Tim Sanders 3333

13

13 Kenoi Kenoi Hiva Hiva Gambit Gambit (2 (2 Games)Games)

Game 1 – Antonio Garcia Game 1 – Antonio Garcia Game 2 -

Game 2 - G. K. GG. K. Giffordifford

38 38 14

14 Elephant Elephant GambitGambit – Gambit Grundy & – Gambit Grundy & G. K. GiffordG. K. Gifford 4141

15

15 Halloween Halloween GambitGambit

2

2 games games by by Colin Colin Brockley Brockley …. …. Pg. Pg. 4444 Commentary,

Commentary, by by Glenn Glenn Giffen Giffen … … pg pg 4545

44 44 16

16 Blackmar Blackmar Diemer Diemer Gambit,Gambit, Gambetto Blackmar Diemer;

Gambetto Blackmar Diemer; La scelta;n.10 ottobre 2005;La scelta;n.10 ottobre 2005;

Alla memoria d

Alla memoria di Emil Josef Diemi Emil Josef Diemer er (1908-1990) Variante 1.d4 h6 (1908-1990) Variante 1.d4 h6 2.e4 g5 3.Bc42.e4 g5 3.Bc4 by

by Correspondance Correspondance Master Master Giorgio Giorgio CodazzaCodazza

47 47

17

17 Blackmar Blackmar Diemer Diemer Gambit Gambit Duetschmann Duetschmann vs. vs. PolgarPolgar by Tim Sawyer by Tim Sawyer 5757

18

18 3 3 Blackmar Blackmar Diemer Diemer Gambit Gambit GamesGames by G. Giffordby G. Gifford 5959

19

19 O. DO. Duras vs. uras vs. O. O. Berstein, Berstein, 1. e4-1. e4-f5 Cf5 Clocked Games,locked Games, Analysis by Fr Analysis by Fritzitz Contributed by Davide Rozzoni

Contributed by Davide Rozzoni

65 65

(5)

This Edition of Unorthodox Openings Newsletter

is respectfully dedicated to the memory of

David Brine Pritchard

(6)

David Brine Pritchard –

19 Oct 1919 to 12 Dec 2005

David Pritchard of Gloucestershire, England, who was perhaps best known for his book,

The Encyclo pedia of Chess Variants, passed away in December of 2005. He will be missed by many. His accomplishments include but are not limited to the following (and certainly not in the order listed):

o editor of Games and Puzzles Magazine o Games Director of the Mind Sports Olympiad o won the Malaysian Championship in 1955 o won the Battle of Britain Chess Competition o President of the British Chess Variants Society o Squadron Leader in the RAF

o Life Fellow of The Royal Geographic Society (he visited over 120 countries)

o Authored several books: Begin Chess

Chess for Beginners

The New Mahjong David Pritchard1 The Right Way to Play Chess

The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants

Our condolences to his wife Elaine, daughter Wanda, grandchildren, and numerous friends.

- G. K. Gifford

A Tr ibute

by Mike Adams

David lived a very full life - he was a pilot in the RAF in WW2, flying the French government in exile back to Paris in 1944. After the war he continued a career in military intelligence. David married Elaine, who was three times British Women’s Champion, in 1952; and they had a daughter and five grandchildren. He visited almost every country in the world and was made a Fellow of the British Royal Geographic Society. He was a strong chess player and once won a game against the young British GM Tony Miles. After his 'retirement' he worked as a Games consultant. His first chess primer published 60 years ago is still in print and has sold several hundred thousand copies worldwide. David also wrote books on Mahjong and Go before his two books on CV's. At the time of his death, he had almost completed revising his 1994 Encyclopedia of CV's. John Beasley, Secretary of the British CV society, of which David was President, hopes to complete the revised edition. I attended the Hastings International last week and organised a CV tournament on New Years eve in David's memory. 17 players took part in this event, playing 8 x 5min CV's, won jointly by IM Andrew Greet and Ja ck Rudd. I have just joined this site and look forward to continuing to organize CV OTB events as a fitting tribute to David who was so inspiring

(7)

A Letter from Davide Rozzoni

This is my last UON as Senior Editor . The main reason is that since the last year I felt an internal push to do something else. Of course, I didn’t’ want UON to die without me, so I needed to find someone who would have loved UON at least as I did, and possibly more. At the right time Gary Gifford came along. Since I knew him he started to support me with friendship, ideas and much required counsels. Now Gary has accepted the

challenging task to become UON Editor. I admire and esteem him. Since he started to support UON, many readers have realized the improvements in our newsletter. I know that UON will continue to grow & improve with him. And I count to continue to support Gary with my friendship & UON with games & articles.

At last, I want to express my deep gratitude to all the people who have contributed to UON in the past with games, columns, articles, e-books, proof-reading, not to forget former assistant editors. UON would not have grown so much without your support. Indeed, a labour of love.

UCO (Unorthodox Chess Openings) yahoo’s list will go on.

If you are interested to subscribe to that list, please send an e-mail to [email protected]

At the files section of the above mentioned list

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UnorthodoxChessOpenings/files/ you will find all former UONs plus a lot of UCO files.

Your chess friend always Davide Rozzoni

A Letter from GKG -

Gary K. Gifford

I met Davide via the internet while searching for games with Hippopotamus Openings. We chatted via e-mail, traded Hippopotamus games, and played 2 Hippo games against each other. Davide told me about UON. I looked through a few and thought they were great, but wondered why they didn’t have covers. So Davide stated I could send him an example cover. One thing led to another and it seemed that we were soon synergistically working on UONs.

It came as a surprise to me to be offered Associate Editor, but an even bigger one to try to fill in as Senior Editor while Davide moves on to complete other endeavours. I will miss Davide’s roll as Senior Editor, but am glad to be able to keep his UON project in motion and to know that we will keep in touch.

(8)

A Book Review –

by Davide Rozzoni

“

The Hippopotamus Rises

–

The Re-emergence of a Chess Opening”

by IM Andrew Martin

Editor: Batsford - Paperback – 144 pages (39 annotated games, a few played in 2004 and 2005) – published in Nov. 2005 – Price in Italy (bought at “Le Due Torri” Chess Bookstore): Euro 23,50 Note that the book includes a useful “Index of variations.”

At last, a whole book dealing with the Hippo!

In these days where chess theory needs to be studied in depth in order to survive in tournament play, the Hippo offers a breath of fresh air, while offering you the opportunity to play original chess from the very

first moves.

In my opinion the book is worth its price, although the coverage of the variations might have been more in depth. On the book cover I can read that the book is for “Club players,” a lower level than “Competitive” Batsford chess books. Of course I understand that an in depth coverage book of a relatively little played system might have been more difficult to sell. In fact I doubt it would have been of little interest to the most of chess players…although, most of us UCO addicted, would have preferred it☺

Hippopotamus Games

- compiled by Davide Rozzoni

Here’s a taste of games dealing with lines covered in IM Andrew Martin’s “The

Hippopotamus Rises,” which is the book I just reviewed. Note that games included in the book are not repeated below.

Luecke,N (2395) - Hickl,J (2570) [B06] Bundesliga 9596 Germany, 1996

1.e4 g6 2.d4 d6 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.c3 Nd7 5.Be2 e6 6.0–0 Ne7 7.a4 0–0 8.Re1 b6 9.Nbd2 Bb7 10.a5 Rb8 11.Bf1 b5 12.Bxb5 Bxe4 13.Ba4 Ba8 14.Nc4 Nf6 15.b4 Nf5 16.Qd3 Nd5 17.Bg5 Qc8 18.Bd2 h6 19.Rab1 Qd8 20.Na3 c5 21.Nc4 cxb4 22.cxb4 Nf6 23.h3 Be4 24.Rxe4 Nxe4 25.Bf4 Rc8 26.b5 e5 27.dxe5 Nc5 28.Qa3 Ne6 29.Be3 Rxc4 30.b6 Nxe3 31.bxa7 Qxa5 32.Qxe3 Rxa4 0–1

Martin,A (2425) - McNab,C (2490) [B07] BCF-ch Dundee (4), 1993

(9)

Holzhaeuer,M (2340) - Martynov,P (2425) [B06] Wuerttemberg-ch Schramberg (9), 1993 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.f4 e6 5.Nf3 Ne7 6.Be3 b6 7.Qd2 Bb7 8.0–0–0 Nd7 9.Be2 0–0 10.h4 Nf6 11.Ng5 h6 12.Bf3 hxg5 13.hxg5 Nd7 14.g4 Re8 15.Rh3 c5 16.dxc5 Nxc5 17.Rdh1 Kf8 18.f5 exf5 19.exf5 gxf5 20.Bxb7 Nxb7 21.Rh8+ Ng8 22.g6 Rxe3 23.gxf7 Kxf7 24.Qxe3 Qf6 25.Qf3 Rb8 26.R8h5 Ne7 27.gxf5 Nc5 28.Rg1 Rg8 29.Kb1 d5 30.Nd1 Ne4 31.Qd3 Qd4 32.Qxd4 Bxd4 33.Rxg8 Kxg8 34.c3 Bc5 35.b4 Bd6 36.Ne3 Nxc3+ 37.Kc2 Ne4 38.b5 Kg7 39.Rh1 Kf6 40.Rh6+ Kg5 41.Rh7 Nf6 42.Rf7 Bc5 43.Kd3 Nd7 44.Kd2 Ne5 45.Rf8 d4 46.Nd1 Nxf5 47.Ra8 Bb4+ 48.Kc1 Ne3 49.Rxa7 Nd3+ 0–1

Charonneau,P - Levtchouk,G (2345) [B06] Montreal op Montreal (1), 1996

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.c3 b6 4.Bd3 Bb7 5.Nf3 d6 6.0–0 Nd7 7.Re1 e6 8.a4 a6 9.Na3 Ne7 10.Nc4 0– 0 11.Ne3 c5 12.h4 cxd4 13.cxd4 Nf6 14.e5 dxe5 15.dxe5 Ne4 16.b4 Nc3 17.Qd2 Bxf3 18.gxf3 Ncd5 19.Ng4 Nc6 20.Bxa6 Ncxb4 21.Bb7 Ra7 22.Bxd5 Nxd5 23.Bb2 Qxh4 24.Kg2 h5 25.Rh1

Qd8 26.Nf6+ Nxf6 27.Qxd8 Rxd8 28.exf6 Bf8 29.Rhd1 Rd5 30.Rxd5 exd5 31.Rd1 Rd7 32.Bc1 Bc5 33.Re1 d4 34.Bh6 Rd8 35.f4 d3 36.f5 d2 37.Rd1 Kh7 38.Bg5 Rd4 39.Be3 Rxa4 40.Rxd2 gxf5 41.Bxc5 bxc5 42.Rd5 Rc4 43.Rxf5 Kg6 44.Rd5 Rc3 45.Rd6 h4 46.Rc6 Kf5 47.f3 Ke5 48.Kh3 Kd5 49.Ra6 Rxf3+ 50.Kxh4 c4 51.Kg5 c3 52.Ra7 Kd6 53.Ra8 c2 54.Rc8 Rf2 55.Kg4 Ke5 56.Kg3 Rd2 57.Rc6 Kd4 58.Kf3 Rd3+ 59.Ke2 Rc3 0–1

Souleidis,G (2345) - Haub,T (2410) [B06] NRW-Liga I 9899 GER (3), 03.12.1998

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be3 a6 5.Qd2 Nd7 6.a4 b6 7.Nf3 h6 8.Be2 e6 9.0–0 Ne7 10.d5 e5 11.Ne1 g5 12.g3 Nf6 13.f3 Ng6 14.Nd3 Nh7 15.Na2 a5 16.b4 h5 17.bxa5 bxa5 18.c4 h4 19.g4 Nf4 20.Nc3 0–0 21.Rab1 Bd7 22.Rfc1 c5 23.Nb5 Bc8 24.Bf1 Nf6 25.Rc2 Qd7 26.h3 Re8 27.Nc1

Bf8 28.Nb3 Qd8 29.Qe1 Bd7 30.Bd2 Bxb5 31.cxb5 Nd7 32.Nxa5 c4 33.Nc6 Qf6 34.a5 Nc5 35.Rxc4 Bg7 36.b6 Nxh3+ 37.Bxh3 Qxf3 38.Qe3 1–0

One of my own favorite games follows. I could not resist to play Nh6 at the 8th

move☺ :

Marini,M (1604)

−

Rozzoni,D (1600) [B10]

Festival Week End SSM III Turno, 13.02.2005

1.e4 c6 2.Nc3 g6 3.d4 d6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 Bg4 6.Be2 Qb6 7.e5 d5

[7...Nh6 8.Ne4 Nf5 9.c3 Nd7 10.Nfg5 Bxe2 11.Qxe2 d5 12.e6 dxe4 13.exd7+ Kf8 14.Nxe4 h5 15.0-0 Rd8 16.Be3 Rxd7 17.Bf2 Qc7 18.g3 b6 19.a4 Nd6 20.a5 Nxe4 21.Qxe4 Bf6 22.axb6 Matulovic,M−Andersson,U/Helsinki FIN 1972/DB2003−4/0-1 (40);

7...Na6 8.Ng5 Bxe2 9.Nxe2 Nh6 10.c3 Nc7 11.Qb3 d5 12.0-0 e6 13.Qxb6 axb6 14.h3 Nf5 15.g4 Ne7 16.Be3 h6 17.Nf3 Kd7 18.Kg2 Bf8 19.Ng3 Na6 20.a3 c5 21.f5 Rg8 22.fxe6+ Ujhazi,D−

Petrovic,M/Herceg Novi YUG 2001/DB2003−4/1-0 (91)]

8.Bd2N [8.0-0 Nh6²; 8.h3 Bxf3 9.Bxf3 e6 10.Na4 (10.g4 Ne7 11.a4 Nd7 12.a5 Qd8 13.Be3 Bf8 14.Bf2 Nc8 15.a6 b5 16.h4 Bb4 17.Kf1 Bxc3 18.bxc3 Ncb6 19.h5 Rg8 20.hxg6 hxg6 21.Bh4 Qc7 22.Qe2 Nf8 23.Bg5 Kd7 24.Kf2 Re8 25.Rh2 Kc8 ½-½ Pacey,K−Morrell,G/North Bay CAN

1996/DB2003−4 (25) ) 10...Qa5+ 11.c3 Nd7 12.b4 Qc7 13.Qb3 ½-½ Hansen,L−Vissing

Andersen,K/Kopenhagen Politiken 1990/DB2003−4 (13)] 8...Nh6 [8...Qxb2 9.Rb1 Qa3

10.Rxb7±;] 9.Na4 Qd8 10.Nc5 b6 [10...Nd7 11.Nxb7 Qb6 12.Na5 Nf5 13.Nb3 Bxf3 14.gxf3 a5÷] 11.Nd3 Nf5 12.c3 e6 13.Nf2 Bxf3 14.Bxf3 Nh4 15.g4= [15.0-0!?² ] 15...h5 16.f5³ [¹16.g5!?= c5 17.Be3 Nf5] 16...hxg4 17.Bxg4 exf5 18.Bh3∓ [18.Be2 f6 19.exf6 Bxf6³] 18...g5³ [18...f6 19.e6∓]

19.Qe2∓ [19.Rg1!? g4 20.Nxg4 fxg4 21.Qxg4=] 19...g4 20.Nxg4 fxg4 21.Bxg4 Qe7 22.0-0-0

22...Nd7 23.e6-+ [RR23.Rhg1 Bh6 24.Bxh6 Rxh6 25.Bxd7+ Kxd7∓] 23...fxe6 24.Bh5+? [24.Rhf1

Bh6 25.Bxe6∓] 24...Kd8 25.Rhg1 Kc7 26.Kb1 [26.Rde1 Raf8-+] 26...Rag8 [26...Bxd4!? 27.cxd4

Qh7+ 28.Ka1 Qxh5 29.Qxe6-+] 27.c4 [27.Rdf1 Rf8 28.Bg4-+] 27...Nf5 [¹27...Bxd4!? 28.Rxg8 Rxg8 29.cxd5 Qh7+ 30.Ka1-+] 28.cxd5 exd5 [28...cxd5 29.Bc3-+] 29.Qa6 [29.Qxe7 Nxe7 30.Bf7 Bxd4 31.Bf4+ Be5 32.Bxe5+ Nxe5 33.Bxg8 Rxg8 34.Rxg8 Nxg8 35.Rf1-+]

(10)

29...Kb8 [¹29...Qe4+!? 30.Ka1 Rxh5 31.Rde1 (31.Qxa7+ Kc8 32.Rc1) 31...Qxd4 32.Qxa7+ Kc8 33.Bc3-+] 30.Bf4+ [30.Rde1 Qf6 (30...Rxh5? 31.Bf4+ (31.Rxe7?! Nxe7 32.Qe2 Bxd4 33.Rxg8+ Nxg8 34.Qxh5 Ngf6 35.Bf4+ Kb7+− ) 31...Ka8 32.Rxe7 Nxe7 33.Qe2+−) 31.Bf4+ Ka8-+] 30...Ka8

31.Rde1 [31.Bf3 Nxd4 32.Qa4-+] 31...Qd8 [¹31...Qh4 32.Bf7 Qxf4 33.Bxg8 Rxg8 34.Qd3 Nxd4 35.Re7 Qxh2 36.Qg6-+] 32.Bg4 [32.Bf7 Rf8 (32...Nxd4?! 33.Qd3-+; 32...Bxd4?! 33.Rxg8 Rxg8 34.Qd3-+) 33.Qa4 Nb8-+] 32...Bxd4 33.Bxf5 [33.Rg2 Nc5 34.Qe2 Re8-+] 33...Rxg1 34.Rxg1 Bxg1 35.Qa4 Kb7 [35...Kb7 36.Qc2 Nc5-+] 0-1

The upcoming Gifford & Wall book dealing with 1.Nh3 and 1...Nh6 is surely welcome as Martin deals with very few games involving an early …Nh6.

- Davide Rozzoni

---1. . . . Nh6 related note from the Associate Editor_:

I had written Nh6 material for UONs 10 and 11 in which I used the nomenclature, “1. … Nh6 Hippopotamus.” I had seen that name applied in a few places on the

internet and in a work by John C. Thompson who wrote a little booklet on the “Hippopotamus” back in the 1950’s. Since then I have come to find that when the

Bishop goes to g7 we actually have a Krazy Kat Defense as named by E. B. Adams (since he played and named it before Thompson did). When the Bishop avoids g7 and, for example, goes to e7 we can refer to the defense as a Hippopotamus.

Thompson played both systems. White can play these systems too, and thus we can have White Krazy Kats, White Hippos, or the White Paris Opening (Amar Opening) or Paris Gambit. These systems are all closely related.

Well-known chess author Bill Wall and I are presently collaborating on a book devoted to winning with these systems. If you have had some impressive wins starting with: 1. Nh3 or 1. ... Nh6 [or shortly after move 1] …. There is still time to submit them for possible inclusion in the book:

WINNINGWITHTHE KRAZYKAT

HIPPOPOTAMUS

ANDPARIS SYSTEMS

by Bill WallandGary K. Gifford

Please send a copy [pgn format preferred] to me at [email protected].

Please enter, in the subject line "Game Submission for Book." Your own comments regarding the game(s) are welcome, but not required.

(11)

White Hippo Games

– by Acmercury

acmer cur y@yahoo. com

Both of the following games were lost on time; However, the opening moves

and middlegame may be of use to those interested in this opening.

After having read a few of the UON, I found that the Hippo was playable

and saw that the key was using the knight to support advancing pawns (which

I admit I am no good at). Most examples in the UON were for Black so I

decided to test it with pure unorthodoxy. Both my games were lost on time

as there were no feasible plans at the beginning, looking for counterplay as

the game went on. But if you were to look at the final position, I doubt that

I stood the lesser. I hope these examples would help others improvise the

opening.

GAME 1 - Event "Rated Game, 10m+0" at "Yahoo! Chess" 2005.10.23

White: acmercury (1966)

Black: email tarsam (1760)

0-1 (Time)

Don't be fooled by my opponent’s ELO...

(12)

(Preceding Diagram) In Game 1, I chose the same setup often used by 1.f3

2.Kf2 players, intending 3.e3 before hitting the centre with 4.d4. I deviated

a little bit.

4 . . .Nc6 5. Nc3 d4 6. exd4 exd4 7. Nce4 Nxe4 8. Nxe4 Qh4+ 9. g3 Qe7 10.

Be2 Bh3 11. d3 O-O-O 12. Ng5 Bd7 13. O-O Nb4 14. Ne4 Nd5 15. Kh1 Ne3

16. Bxe3 dxe3 17. Rg1 f5 18. Nc3 Qb4 19. Qc1 Bc5 20. a3 Qd4 21. Nd1 Bc6

22. b4 Bd6 23. Nxe3 Rhe8 (Diagram)

(Preceding Diagram) At this point I felt like passivity was all there was, and

until my 24.Nxf5, I thought Black was ready to deliver the killer blow.

Funny how, as the game went on, my position got better...

24. Nxf5 Qf6 25. Nxd6+ Rxd6 26. Bf1 Bxf3+ 27. Bg2 g5 28. Qf1 g4

29. Re1 Rxe1 30. Qxe1 Re6 31. Qf1 Kb8 32. Bxf3 gxf3 33. Qf2 Re2 34. Re1

Qe7 35. Rxe2 fxe2 36. Qe1 Kc8 37. Kg2 0-1 (Time)

In Game 2, instead of letting the enemy pawn-raid straight in, I decided to

set-up a nice blockade... the only weakness is the cramping effect on the

Queenside.

(13)

GAME 2 - Event "Rated Game 20/0 at Yahoo! Chess; 2005.10.24

White: acmercury (1940)

Black: semihakarx (1867)

0-1 (Time)

Again, I think I played well to more than equalize but lost on time.

I think people will flame me when they look at the final position...

1. Nh3 e5 2. f3 Bc5 3. e3 d5 4. Nf2 Qe7 5. c4 d4 6. Ne4 Bb6 7. Bd3 Nc6

(Diagram)

8. O-O Be6 9. Na3 O-O-O 10. Qb3 Qh4 11. Ng3 dxe3 12. dxe3 Nge7

13. Rd1 Rd7 14. Bf1 Rxd1 15. Qxd1 f5 16. Qc2 f4 17. Ne4 Bxe3+

18. Bxe3 fxe3 19. Qc3 Bf5 20. Qxe3 Bxe4 21. Qxe4 Qxe4 22. fxe4 Rd8

23. Re1 Ng8 24. Nb5 Nf6 25. Nc3 Rd2 26. Re2 Rd4 27.b3 h5 28. g3 Kd8

29. Re1 a6 30. Bg2 Nb4 31. Rf1 c6 32. Rf5 Rd3 33. Rf3 Rd6 34. Bf1 Rd4 35.

Rf5 Rd2 36. Rxe5 Nxa2 37. Nxa2 Rxa2 38. Rg5 Nxe4 39. Rxg7 Nd2 40. Be2

Nxb3 41. Bxh5 Nc5 42. h4 b5 43. cxb5 cxb5 44. Bg6 Ne6 45. Rg8+ Ke7 46.

h5 Nf8 47. h6 Ra1+ 48. Kg2 Ra2+ 49. Kh3 a5 50. h7 Nxh7 51. Bxh7 a4 52.

Rb8 Rb2 53. Ra8 Ra2 54. Bb1 Rb2 55. Be4 Rb3 56. Bd5 Rc3 57. Ra5 Rc5

58. Bg2 0-1 (Time)

(14)

MY CRUMBLING

STONEWALL ATTACK

AGAINST

ALEX SHABALOV _{by G. K. Gifford}

It was a dismal gray rainy October day and I drove for about an hour to play against International Grandmaster Alex Shabalov in a simultaneous exhibition. Motivated by a chance to meet the man and a chance to win a $1000 gift certificate (or $500 in cash) at the “HOUSE of CHESS” in North Olmstead, Ohio.

When I arrived (about 3:30 p.m) there were about 5 players with games in progress. Mr. Shabalov had started the event at 1:00 and was playing up to 15 players at a time. When a game completed, that player left his seat and another could begin a game.

I felt that I had great chances to win, and Fritz analysis supports this view. However, I could not calculate at near the speed of Shabalov. I would look up to see him standing at the board. It seemed he was returning to our board rather quick. Once I looked up and said, “Oh my… back so soon?” He smiled and said, “Go on and think some more, I’ll come back.”

Note: At the time this game was played, Mr. Shabalov was ranked 8th in the United States and 180 in the world.

(1) Gifford,G

−

Shabalov,A (2570) [D00]

House of Chess Simul, 08.10.2005 Comments by Fritz 6.0, unless otherwise noted or implied.

1.d4 d5 2.e3 ¤f6 3.¤d2 ¥f5 4.¤gf3 e6 5.¥e2 ¥d6 6.¤e5 ¤bd7 7.f4 [c5 8.c3 0-0 9.0-0

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-w

q t

rk+(

7z

pp+n+pz

pp'

6-+-v

lps

n +&

5+ z

pps

Nl+-%

4-+-z

P z

P +$

3+ z

P z

P-+-#

(15)

9...¦c8 [¹9...¤e4!?³ must definitely be considered] 10.g4² ¥e4 11.¥f3 [¹11.g5!? is worth looking at 11...¤e8 12.¤xe4 dxe4 13.£a4±] 11...cxd4 12.exd4 [12.¤xe4 dxe4 13.¥g2 ¥xe5 14.fxe5 ¤xe5 15.exd4 ¤exg4=] 12...b5 [12...¥xf3 13.£xf3 £b6 14.¦f2³] 13.a3 a5 14.g5

XABCDEFGHY

8-+rw

q t

rk+(

7+-+n+pz

pp'

6-+-v

lps

n +&

5z

pp+ps

N-z

P-%

4-+-z

Plz

P +$

3z

P z

P +L+ #

2-z

P-s

N-+-z

P"

1t

R v

LQ+Rm

K-!

xabcdefghy

This push gains space [14.¤xe4!? is interesting 14...¤xe4 15.£e2=] 14...¥xf3³ 15.¦xf3 ¤e4 16.¤xe4= dxe4 17.¦h3 g6 18.£e1² ¤xe5 19.dxe5 ¥c5+ [20.¥e3 £b6 21.¥xc5 White gets strong initiative 21...£xc5+ 22.¢h1 h5 [22...¦fd8 23.£h4 h5 24.gxh6²] 23.gxh6± ¢h7 24.£xe4 ¦cd8 [24...£f2 25.b3±] 25.¦g1 ¦d2?

XABCDEFGHY

8 + + t

r +(

7+-+-+p+k'

6-+-+p+pz

P&

5z

ppw

q z

P-+-%

4 + +Qz

P +$

3z

P z

P + +R#

2-z

P-t

r-+-z

P"

1+-+-+-t

RK!

xabcdefghy

[25...¦d7 26.b4 axb4 27.cxb4± (27.£xb4?? £c6+ 28.£e4 £xe4+ 29.¦f3 £xf3+ 30.¦g2 ¦d1#) ] 26.¦hg3

Here I missed the clever Rxg6! But Shabalov was returning to the board in amazing time and I was obligated to move. [¹26.¦xg6! ¢h8 27.¦g1+−]

Fritz had a lot to say about this game and I actually deleted a lot of it because it was a bit overwhelming and clouded the actual game. However, for the remainder of the game I leave

(16)

26...¦g8 27.b4 £c7 28.h4 £d8 Threatening mate... 29.¦g5 ¦d3 [29...¦f2 30.¦1g2 ¦xg2 31.£xg2 £d1+ 32.¢h2 axb4 33.axb4²]

30.¢h2 [30.£b7!? ¦f8 31.£g2±] 30...¦xc3² 31.h5 [31.¦1g2 axb4 32.axb4 ¦c4= (‹32...¢xh6 33.h5 ¦c4 34.£f3=) ]

31...¦xa3 32.bxa5 ¦xa5 33.hxg6+ [33.£c2!? ¦a3 34.¦1g2=] 33...¦xg6³ 34.¢h3 [34.¦1g2 ¦a4 35.£f3 £d5 (35...¦xh6+? doesn't solve anything 36.¦h5 £f8 37.£d3+ ¢h8 38.¦gg5+− ) 36.£xd5

exd5 (36...¦xh6+ 37.¢g1 ¦a1+ 38.¢f2 ¦f1+ 39.¢e2 ¦e1+ 40.¢d2 ¦d1+ 41.¢c2 ¦g6 42.¦h5+ ¢g7 43.¦xg6+ fxg6 44.£b7+ ¦d7 45.£xd7+ ¢g8 46.¦h7 g5 47.£f7#) 37.¦xg6 fxg6=]

34...¦a3+ [34...¦a4 35.£b1 ¦xf4-+] 35.¦5g3?? [35.¦1g3 ¦xg3+ 36.¢xg3 £d7³ (36...¢xh6?! 37.¦xg6+ fxg6 38.£h1+ ¢g7 39.£b7+ ¢h6 40.£xb5²) ]

35...¦axg3+ [¹35...£f8 and Black has triumphed 36.£xg6+ fxg6 37.¦xa3 £xa3+ 38.¢g4 £d3-+] 36.¦xg3∓ ¢xh6 [36...£d5 37.£b1∓]

37.£e3 [37.¦xg6+ fxg6 38.¢g3 £d5∓] 37...¢g7 [37...¦xg3+ 38.¢xg3 b4 39.¢f2∓] 38.¦xg6+

¢xg6

“

Black begins to deal mighty blows

”

−Fritz

39.£g3+? [39.£e4+ ¢g7∓] 39...¢h7 [¹39...¢f5!? 40.£f3 £g8-+] 40.£f3 £d5 Do you see the

mate threat? 41.£h5+ ¢g7 42.£g5+ ¢f8 43.£h6+ ¢e8 44.£h8+ ¢d7 45.£f6? [¹45.¢g3!?∓]

45...£d3+ [45...£h1+ 46.¢g4 ¢e8 47.f5-+] 46.¢h2 [46.¢g2 £h7-+] 46...£h7+ 47.¢g3 [47.¢g2 b4 48.f5 £xf5-+] 47...£g6+ 0-1

XABCDEFGHY

8-+-+-+-+(

7+-+k+p+-'

6 + +pw

Qq+&

5+p+-z

P-+-%

4 + + z

P +$

3+-+-+-m

K-#

2-+-+-+-+"

1+-+-+-+-!

(17)

GROB 1. g4 !? Adventures

Part 1 – Why the Grob?

by Orest Vovk {edited by Davide Rozzoni} The move 1.g4 is named Grob Attack after the name of the Swiss Master Henry Grob, who played it regularly in on the board as well in correspondence games.

My first acquaintance with 1.g4 took place on the Crimean peninsula in the city of Yalta in the summer of 1995. At that time I saw IM Vlassov playing it against future world champion Ruslan Ponomariov:

Vlassov, N. - Ponomariov, R., Yalta 1995

1.g4 d5 2. Bg2 Bxg4 3.c4 c6 4. Qb3 Qb6 5.cxd5 Nf6 6. Nc3 Qxb3 7.axb3 cxd5 8. Nxd5 Nxd5 9. Bxd5 Nc6 10. Nf3 f6 11.d3 e6 12. Rg1 exd5 13. Rxg4 f5 1/2

The game ended in a draw, but the move 1.g4 impressed me a lot. Since then I started to play it sometimes against weaker opponents, in order to be ready to play it against strong players.

The first real fight took place in 1998 in a game with IM Shishkin Vadim. With general surprise the game finished with my win.

1.g2-g4

some advantages

:

* It is rarely played and produces interesting play.

* It forces your opponent to think from the first move.

* Playing a rare opening from White point of view, his/her knowledge of the

opening should be superior to the opponent’s. This also offers white the

opportunity to save additional time for use in the middle-game.

* It is possible to win a game quickly.

1. g2-g4

some disadvantages:

* There are more reliable openings.

* Statistics confirm that white only scores about 40% with 1.g4.

* It is possible to lose a game quickly.

The most common Black answer is the aggressive 1.... d5. Black takes the center with a pawn, and simultaneously attacks the proud g4 pawn.

(18)

Under a psychological perspective it is difficult to play this position as Black: 1st thought might be “My opponent plays so badly that he/she has already lost a pawn! And/or 2nd thought “Now how do I defend this advantage?”

Many players do not maintain this pressure and start thinking for a long time. In my experience, there were cases when my opponents spent up to 90 minutes for the first 7 or 8 moves. I realized that surprise is an important tool.

For instance 3 … .dxc4? 4. Bxb7 +--and 3 … .c6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5. Qb3 e6? 6. Qa4 +-.

If black doesn’t take on g4, his difficulties to protect the centre do not come to an end. In blitz games even grandmasters do not wish to waste time. So they play simple moves like 2 … .c6 3.h3 e5 4.d4 e4 5.c4-and white simply plays Qb3, Nc3 and so on

It is necessary that Black tries not to lose the center (in comparison with the French Defence with inverted colors, here white has no blocked Bishop and the “g” pawn ready to attack the Knight if it were placed on f6. These things make it difficult for Black to protect adequately the d5 square.

For example:

5 … .Bd6 6. Nc3 Ne7 7. Qb3 0-0 8. Bg5 f6 9. Bd2 Be6? 10.cxd5 cxd5 11. Ne4!

A Queen exchange will not help also: 5 … .Be6 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. Qb3 Qb6 8.c5! Qxb3 (if 8…Qc7 it follows 9.Bf4!) 9.axb3 Nbd7 10.b4! a6 11.b5 with advantage.

Or 5 … .Bd6 6. Nc3 Ne7 7. Qb3 Qb6 8.c5! Qxb3 9.axb3 Bc7 10.b4 a6 11.b5 Nbd7 12.b4 0-0 13.b6! Bb8 14.b5 +/-.

If black tries dxc4-then after Be4 and Nf3, whites solve the main task (development of the Nf1) with advantage.

Learned by bitter experience 4 … .exd4 5. Qxd4 (with small advantage in development) or 4 … .Nd7 5.c4! dxc4 6. Nf3!

Personally, when I started to play 1.g4 I wanted to eat the Ra8, but then I started to taste some strategic victories and the I started feel pleasure from playing complex struggles

(19)

Lets look at 1.g4 e5 2. Bg2 h5 3.d4!

Now, if 3 … .ed 4.g5! White sacrifices a pawn with compensation. The position after white’s 3rd move has not been studied extensively, but my results with it encourage me to play it again, so it is interesting! For example, 4 … .Nc6 5. Nf3 Bc5 6.c3 dxc3 7. Nc3 d6 8.0-0 Nge7 9. Na4! At a price of a pawn, white has two magnificent Bishops pressing on both diagonals.

In conclusion, I hope that the number of players who will try 1.g4 will increase; and that we will be able to improve the statistics, from White’s perspective.

Part 2 - Grob Games,

Compiled by Davide Rozzoni

Vovk,O - Dolzhikova,K Cup Independence - 2005 (A) Kyiv (3), 14.08.2005

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.d4 e4 5.c4 h5!? More common is 5...Bd6 and after 6.Nc3 Ne7 7.Qb3 play may follow:

Basman,M (2385) - Singh,S (2225) Lloyds Bank op London ENG, 1989

7. ..0-0 8.Bd2 Na6 9.Rc1 Bb4 10.Nxe4 dxe4 11.Bxb4 c5 12.Bxc5 Nxc5 13.dxc5 f5 14.gxf5 Bxf5 15.h4 Ng6 16.Qc3 Nf4 17.Bf1 Qc7 18.h5 Rad8 19.h6 Nd3+ 20.exd3 exd3 21.Nf3 Rde8+ 22.Kd1 Bg4 23.Bxd3 Rxf3 24.Kc2 Bf5 25.Rcd1 Rd8 26.Rhg1 g6 27.Bxf5 Rxc3+ 28.bxc3 Rxd1 29.Be6+ Kf8 30.Rxd1 Qxc5 31.Rd4 Qe5 32.Bg4 Qg5 33.f3 Qxh6 34.Rd8+ Ke7 35.Rd7+ Kf6 36.Rxb7 Qh2+ 37.Kb3 h5 38.Bd7 Qf2 39.Rb5 Qxf3 40.Kb4 Qd1 41.Rd5 Qb1+ 42.Kc5 0-1

Narciso Dublan,M (2235) - Cramling,P (2470) ESP-chT Linares (1), 1991

7. ..Na6 8.Bg5 f6 9.Bd2 Qb6 10.e3 Qxb3 11.axb3 h5 12.gxh5 Be6 13.Bf1 Nb4 14.Ra4 a5 15.c5 Bc7 16.Na2 Nxa2 17.Rxa2 Kd7 18.Be2 Bf7 19.Kf1 Bxh5 20.Bxh5 Rxh5 21.b4 a4 22.Ne2 g5 23.Ng3 Rh7 24.Ke2 f5 25.Nxf5 Ng6 26.f3 exf3+ 27.Kxf3 g4+ 28.Kg2 Nh4+ 29.Kf2 Ng6 30.Ng3 Bxg3+ 31.Kxg3 Rah8 32.h4 0-1

Tuturin,S (2248) - Nikitin,A (2418) RUS-Cup03

(Geller mem) Moscow (7), 08.02.1999

7. ..h6 8.Bd2 Bc7 9.0-0-0 0-0 10.g5 hxg5 11.Bxg5 dxc4 12.Qc2 f6 13.Be3 Nd5 14.Nxe4 Be6 15.Nc5 Bf7 16.Qe4 Re8 17.Qh4 b6 18.Ne4 Qe7 19.Bd2 Na6 20.Nc3 Nab4 21.Bxd5 Nxd5 22.Nf3 Nxc3 23.bxc3 Qxe2 24.Rdg1 Qxf3 25.Rxg7+ Kf8 26.Qh6 Bf4 27.Bxf4 ½-½

In the position arising from 1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.d4 e4 5.c4 h5 in 2 occasions Basman preferred the following continuation:

Basman,M - Granat,R Borehamwood, 1981

6.g5 f5 7.cxd5 cxd5 8.Nc3 Nc6 9.h4 Be6 10.Nh3 Bd6 11.Nf4 Bxf4 12.Bxf4 Nge7 13.e3 a6 14.0-0 Ng6 15.Bg3 b5 16.a4 b4 17.Ne2 a5 18.Rc1 Na7 19.Rc7 Nxh4 20.Rxa7 Nf3+ 21.Bxf3 Rxa7 22.Nf4 exf3 23.Nxe6 Qe7 24.Nf4 Qxg5 25.Qxf3 h4 26.Rc1 Qd8 27.Ng6 Rh6 28.Qxf5 1-0

(20)

Basman,M - Large,P (2330) BCF-ch Torquay ENG (8), 1982

6.g5 Ne7 7.Nc3 Na6 8.h4 Ng6 9.Be3 Be6 10.Qa4 Qd7 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Qxd7+ Kxd7 13.f3 exf3 14.Bxf3 Nc7 15.Bf2 Bd6 16.e3 Raf8 17.e4 dxe4 18.Bxe4 Nf4 19.Nf3 Ncd5 20.Ne5+ Bxe5 21.dxe5 Nxc3 22.bxc3 Bd5 23.Bxd5 Nxd5 24.c4 Ne7 25.Rd1+ Ke6 26.Rd6+ Kxe5 27.Bg3+ Ke4 28.0-0 Rd8 29.Rf4+ Ke3 30.Rxf7 Rxd6 31.Rxe7+ Kf3 32.Bxd6 Rd8 33.c5 b6 34.Rf7+ Kg4 35.Kg2 Kxh4 36.g6 Kg5 37.Rxg7 bxc5 38.Bxc5 Rc8 39.Be3+ Kf6 40.Bd4+ Kg5 41.Bxa7 Rc2+ 42.Kf3 Rxa2 43.Be3+ Kf6 44.Bd4+ Kf5 45.Rg8 Ra3+ 46.Ke2 Ke4 47.g7 1-0

However, Orest Vovk, currently the leading 1.g4 player in the world, together with S. Belezky, chose6. Nc3 (diagram):

6. ..hxg4 7.cxd5 cxd5 8.Qb3 Nc6?! (9. ..Ne7!? may be an improvement 10. Bf4 a6 11.Rc1 Nbc6) 9.Qxd5 Qxd5 10.Nxd5 Nxd4 11.Bxe4 Bd6 12.Be3 Bf5 13.Bxf5 Nxf5 14.Rd1 Nge7 15.Bf4 Rd8 16.Nc7+ Bxc7 17.Bxc7 Rxd1+ 18.Kxd1 Kd7 19.Bf4 Ng6 20.Bd2 Ke6 21.Rh2 Kd5 22.Rg2 gxh3 23.Rh2 Nd6 24.Rxh3 Rxh3 25.Nxh3 Ne4 26.Be1 f6 27.f3 Nd6 28.Bg3 Nc4 29.Kc1 Nce5 30.b3 Ne7 31.Nf4+ Kd6 32.Nd3 N7c6 33.Kd2 b6 34.Ke3 Ke6 35.Nf4+ Kf7 36.Nd5 Ke6 37.Nc7+ Kd7 38.Nb5 a6 39.Nc3 Ke6 40.Ne4 Nd7 41.Nc3 Nde5 42.Na4 Nd7 43.Be1 g5 44.Nc3 ½-½

(21)

GAMBITS FROM FRANCE (V)

by

Dany Sénéchaud

([email protected] )

I. The Diemermania :

Cult openings Emil Diemer played were Latvian, Englund or Elephant Gambits, etc. Here some ordinary players try to become strong gambiteers!

J. JEAU – S. SCHMITT, corr. Cojeli

2002 ;

Oberndorfer Gambit

1.Nf3 g5 !!?

played four times by Diemer in 1984.

2.Nxg5 e5, 3.d4 h6,

(see Diagram)

4.Nxf7

[ 4.Nf3 e4, 5.Ng1 ]

4…Kxf7, 5.dxe5

Nc6, 6.Qd5+ Ke8, 7.e4 Qe7, 8.f4d6,

9.Bb5 Bd7, 10.b3 dxe5, 11.Ba3 Qe6,

12.Qxe6+

Bxe6,

13.Bxc6+

bxc6,

14.Bxf8 Kxf8, 15.f5 Bf7, 16.c4 Nf6,

17.Nc3 Rd8, 18.Ke2 Rg8, 19.g3 Rg4,

20.Rad1 Rxd1, 21.Rxd1 Nxe4, 22.Nxe4

Rxe4+, 23.Kf3 Rd4, 24.Rxd4 exd4,

(22)

25.c5 Bd5+, 26.Ke2 Be4, 27.g4 Kf7, 28.b4 Kf6,29.Kf2 Kg5, 30.h3 Kf4,

31.a3 Bd5, 32.a4 Ke4, 0-1.

M. POUYDESSEAU – S. SCHMITT, corr. Cojeli 2003

Bogart Gambit [ A 45 ]

1.d4 Nf6, 2.g4 e5 !? 3.dxe5 Nxg4, 4.Nf3 Nc6, 5.Bg5 Be7, 6.Bf4 Bc5, 7.e3

Qe7, 8.Nc3 Ngxe5, 9.Nd5 Qd6, 10.Bg2

(see diagram)

10…f6 ?

[ 10…a6 ! 11.Nd4 Ne7 ] 11.Nd4 ! Ne7, 12.Nb5 ! 1-0.

M. POUYDESSEAU – S. SCHMITT, corr. Cojeli 2003

Bogart Gambit

1.d4 Nf6, 2.g4 e5 !? 3.g5 Ne4, 4.dxe5 Qe7, 5.f4 Qb4+, 6.c3 Qb6, 7.e3 Bc5,

8.Qd3 d5, 9.exd5 ??

[ - 9.b4 ! ; - 9.Bh3 ! Nc6 10.Ke2 ]

9…Nxd6, 10.b4 Bf5 !

11.Qd2 Qc6, 12.bxc5 Qxh1, 13.cxd6 Qxg1, 14.dxc7 Nc6, 15.Ba3 Bh3,

16.Qd3 Qxf1+, 17.Qxf1 Bxf1, 18.Kxf1 Kd7, 19.Nd2 Rhe8, 20.Kf2 ?

[

20.Ke2 ] 20…Kxc7, 21.Nc4 Rad8, 22.Ke2 b5, 23.Nd2 Na5, 24.Rb1

Rxd2+, 25.Kxd2 Nc4+, 26.Kd3 Rxe3+, 27.Kd4 Nxa3, 28.Rb3 Nc2+,

29.Kc5 a6, 30.a4 bxa4, 0-1.

(23)

D. SENECHAUD – GARRAUD,

Mont de Marsan 1997

Bogart Gambit

1.d4 Nf6, 2.g4 d5, 3.g5 Ne4 4.Bg2!? Bf5, 5.c4! e6, 6.f3 Nd6,

(6...Bb4+, 7.Kf1)

7.c5 Nc8, 8.e4 dxe4, 9.fxe4 Bg6, 10.Be3 c6, 11.h4 h6, 12.h5 Bh7, 13.Nh3

Be7, 14.g6 fxg6, 15.hxg6 Bxg6, 16.Qg4 Bh4+, 17.Ke2 Bf7, 18.Nf4 g5,

19.Nxe6 Bxe6, 20.Qxe6+ Ne7, 21.Bf3 Qd7, 22.Qf6 Rf8, 23.Bh5+, 1-0.

S. SCHMITT – M. POUYDESSEAU

, corr. Cojeli 2003

Bogart Gambit

1.d4 Nf6, 2.g4 Nxg4, 3.e4 d5,

[ 3…d6 4.Nc3 c6 ! 5.Be2 Nf6 6.Be3 (Bf4 ?!) Qa5 7.Qd2 e5 (7…Ng4 8.f4 !?) 8.f4 (8.0-0-0 ? b5 -+) 8…Nbd7 (8…Ng4 9.0-0-0, unclear) 9.a4 ! (9.0-0-0 b5 10.a3 exd4 11.Bxd4 b4) 9.Qc7 ! (- 9…b5 ?? 10.b4 ! ; - 9…g6, 10.Nh3 ! with Nf2-Nd3-h4) 10.Nh3 ! (with Nf2-Nd3) 10…b6 !?, unclear ]

4.Be2 h5, 5.e5 g6, 6.Bf4 Nc6, 7.Nc3 e6,

8.Qd2 Bd7, 9.Nf3 Bg7, 10.Bg5 f6, 11.Bh4 Qe7, 12.h3 g5, 13.Nxg5 ! fxe5,

14.hxg4 hxg4, 15.Nxe6 Rxh4, 16.Nxc7+ Kf7, 17.Rxh4 Qxh4, 18.dxe5

Qh1+, 19.Bf1 d4, 20.O-O-O ! Kf8, 21.Qf4+ Ke7, 22.N3d5+ Kd8, 23.Qg5+

Kc8, 24.Qxg7, 1-0.

O. LEQUEUX – S. MORIN (ICCF 2400), corr. Cojeli 2003

Elephant Gambit [ C40 ]

1.e4 e5, 2.Nf3 d5, 3.exd5 Bd6, 4.Nc3 Nf6, 5.d4 e4, 6.Ne5 O-O, 7.Bg5

Nbd7, 8.Nxe4 Qe8 (see diagram)

(24)

9.Nxf6+

[ 9.Bxf6+ ! gxf6, 10.f4 fxe5, 11.dxe5 Be7, 12.h4 !? (with Rh3) 12…f6 (12…f5, 13.Ng5) 13.Qd4 ]

9…Nxf6, 10.Bxf6 gxf6, 11.f4 fxe5, 12.dxe5 Qa4, 13.Qf3

Qb4+, 14.c3 Qxb2, 15.Rd1 Bf5, 16.exd6 Bc2, 17.Bd3 Rfe8+, 18.Kf1

Bxd1, 19.Qxd1 cxd6, 20.h4 Re3, 21.Kg1 Qxc3, 22.Be2 Rae8, 23.Kf2

R3xe2+, 24.Qxe2 Rxe2+, 25.Kxe2 Qc4+, 0-1.

*

Of course, the major entry in thesecult openings is the

Blackmar-Diemer Gambit

:

C. MANIA – M. LAPATIE,

Nîmes 2003

B.-D. G.

1.d4 d5, 2. e4 dxe4, 3. Nc3 Nf6, 4. f3 exf3, 5. Nxf3 a6 ?! 6. Bg5 e6, 7. Bd3

h6, 8. Bxf6 Qxf6, 9. O-O Bd6, 10. Ne4 Qd8, 11. g4 O-O, 12. g5 Bf4, 13.

h4 Be3+, 14. Kh1 Bxd4, 15. gxh6 gxh6, 16. Nxd4 Qxd4, 17. Rg1+ Kh8,

18. Qh5 Qe3, 19. Rg3 Qf4, 20. Rf3, 1-0.

C. MANIA – BALLIER, Nîmes 2003

B.-D. G.

1. d4 d5, 2. e4 dxe4, 3. Nc3 Nf6, 4. f3 exf3, 5. Nxf3 Bg4, 6. h3 Bh5, 7. g4

Bg6, 8. Ne5 e6, 9. Qf3 c6, 10. g5 Bh5, 11. Qf2 Nd5, 12. Be2 Bg6, 13. O-O

Nxc3, 14. Nxg6 Nxe2+, 15. Kh2 Bd6+, 16. Ne5 f6, 17. gxf6 gxf6, 18. Qxe2

fxe5, 19. dxe5 Rf8, 20. Rxf8+ Bxf8, 21. Qh5+ Kd7, 22. Bg5 Qc7, 23. Qf7+

Kc8, 24. Qe8+, 1-0.

C. MANIA – LEFEBVRE,

Montpellier 2003

B.-D. G.

1. d4 d5, 2. e4 dxe4, 3. Nc3 Nf6, 4. f3 exf3, 5. Nxf3 e6, 6. Bg5 Be7, 7. Bd3

Nbd7, 8.O-O c5, 9. dxc5 Nxc5, 10. Bb5+ Bd7, 11. Bc4 Qb6, 12. Kh1

Qxb2, 13. Qd4 Na4, 14. Bd2 Qb6, 15. Qh4 Rc8, 16. Nxa4 ! Bxa4, 17.

Bxe6 Bd7, 18. Bxd7+ Nxd7, 19. Rae1 Nf6, 20. Qa4+ Kf8, 21. Rxe7 !!

Kxe7, 22. Bb4+ Rc5, 23. Re1+ Kd8, 24. Bxc5 Qxc5, 25. Ne5 Rf8, 26. Qb3

Kc8, 27. Qh3+ Kd8, 28. Rd1+ Ke7, 29. Nd7 Qxc2, 30. Qa3+ Ke6, 31.

Nxf8+ Kf5, 32. Qd3+, 1-0.

(25)

C. MANIA – B. CANTERINI, Montpellier 2002

B.-D. G.

1.d4 d5, 2.Nc3 Nf6, 3.e4 dxe4, 4.f3 exf3, 5.Nxf3 Bg4, 6.h3 Bh5, 7.g4 Bg6,

8.Ne5 Nbd7, 9.Qf3 !

[ 9.Nxg6 hxg6, 10.g5 ! Nh5 ? 11.Qf3 c6, 12.Bc4 e6, 13.0-0 Qe7, 14.Be3 0-0-0, 15.Qxf7 Ng3, 16.Qxe7 Bxe7, 17.Rf7 Nf5, 18.Bxe6 Nxe3, 19.Rxe7 Nxc2, 20.Rd1 ! See : C. MANIA – S. CORE, Montpellier, 2003 ]

9…c6, 10.Nxg6 hxg6, 11.Bc4 ?!

[

11.g5 ! ] 11…e6, 12.0-0 ?! [ 12.g5 ! ] 12…Nb6 ! 13.Bb3 Qd7, [

13…Qxd4+ ! ] 14.g5 ! Nh5 ? 15.Be3 Bd6, 16.Ne4 Rf8, 17.c4 ! Be7,

18.Rfd1 0-0-0 ?! 19.d5 ! exd5, 20.cxd5 cxd5 ?!

[ 20…Qf5 ] 21.Bxb6 !

axb6, 22.Rac1+ Kb8, 23.Rxd5 Qe8,

(Qxd5) 24.Qc3 Rxd5, 25.Qc7+ Ka7,

26.Bxd5 Bc5+ ?

(Zeitnot) 27.Rxc5 ! Qa8, 28.Rc3, 1-0.

C. MANIA – MURETTI

, Nîmes 2003

B.-D. G.

1.d4 d5, 2.Nc3

[ 2.e4 dxe4, 3.Nc3 Bf5, 4.f3 exf3 ?! (4…e5 ! 5.Be3 !) 5.Nxf3 e6, 6.Bc4 c6 ?! 7.0-0 Be7 ?! 8.Ne5 ! Nf6 ? 9.Nxf7 ! (Rxf5 !) 9…Kxf7, 10.Rxf5 Qd7, 11.Qe2 Qxd4+, 12.Be3 Qd7, 13.Rd1 Qc8, 14.Bg5 Re8, 15.Ne4 Rd8, 16.Rxd8 Qxd8, 17.Nf6 Bxf6, 18.Qe6+ Kg6, 19.Bd3 Nd7, 20.Rf6+ Kg5, 21.Qf5+ Kh4, 22.g3+, mat. C. MANIA – SEVRA, Albi 2003 ]

2…Nf6, 3.e4 dxe4, 4.f3 exf3, 5.Nxf3 Bf5, 6.Ne5 e6, 7.g4 Bg6, 8.Qf3

Qxd4 ?! 9.Nxg6 ! hxg6, 10.Qxb7 !? Bb4, 11.Qxa8 ?

[ 11.Bd2 Bxc3, 12.bxc3 ! Qe4, 13.Qxe4 Nxe4, 14.Bg2 ! ]

11…Bxc3+ ! 12.bxc3 Qxc3+, 13.Kd1 0-0, 14.Rb1

Rd8+, 15.Bd3 Nc6, 16.Qb7 Rb8, etc. 0-1.

(32

nd

)

C. MANIA – TABARONIS

, Bordeaux 2003

Clement Mania’s fighting Opening

1.d4 Nf6, 2.Nc3(!) g6, 3.e4 d6, 4.f4 Bg7, 5.Nf3 c5 !

[ 5…0-0, 6.e5 Nfd7, 7.h4 ]

6.e5 ! dxe5 !? [ 6…Nfd7 ! 7.Bc4 cxd ! (7…0-0 8.e6 ! Nb6 9.exf+ Kh8, 10.h4 !) 8.Bxf7 !?! ]

7.fxe5 Nfd7, 8.Bc4 cxd !? 9.Bxf7+ !?! Kxf7, 10.Ng5+ Kg8, 11.Qd4 Qe8,

12.Nd5 Na6, 13.Nxe7+ Qxe7, 14.Qd5+ Kf8, 15.Ne6+ Ke8, 16.Bg5 Nf6 ?

17.Ng7+ ! Qxg7, 18.Bf6 Qf8, 19.Bxh8 Qxh8, 20.0-0 Bf5 ? 21.Qb7 !, etc.

1-0. (35

th

)

LAFFONT – C. MANIA, Toulouse 2003

Soller Gambit

1.d4 e5, 2.dxe5 Nc6, 3.Nf3 f6 4.exf6 Nxf6, 5.e3 d5, 6.Bd3 Bd6 ! 7.0-0 0-0,

8.h3 Qe8 ! 9.Re1 Qh5, 10.Be2 Bxh3 !11.Nh2 Qg5, 12.g3 Bxg3, 0-1.

(26)

*

The German Chesshistorian Michael Negele recently sent me a strange

unpublished Diemer game, which was played against him :

Michael NEGELE – Emil DIEMER

, Strasbourg 1978

Irregular Diemer’s Opening

1.Nf3 Nc6, 2.d4 d5, 3.Bf4 f6 !!?? 4.Nc3 g5, 5.Bg3 g4,

[ 5…a6! 6.e3 e6, 7.a3 (7.Bd3 Nb4) (7.Nxg5 fxg5, 8.Qh5+ Kd7) 7…Nge7, 8.Bd3 Nf5 ]

6.Nh4 a6, 7.e3 f5, 8.h3

Bg7, 9.hxg4 fxg4, 10.Bd3 Nb4,

[ 10…Nh6, 11.Bf4 0-0, 12.Bxh6 Bxh6, 13.Ng6! ]

11.Bf5 Nh6, 12.Bxc8 Rxc8, 13.a3 Nc6, 14.Bf4 Qd7, 15.Qd3 e6, 16.0-0-0

[ 16.Qe2 e5, 17.dxe5 Nxe5, 18.0-0-0 c6, 19.e4! ]

16…Qf7, 17.Qe2 Nxd4, 18.Rxd4

Bxd4, 19.Bxh6 Bxc3,

[ 19…Bg7 ]

20.bxc3 Rg8, 21.e4 c6, 22.Be3 Kd7, 23.g3

Qe7, 24.Kb2 Kc7, [ 24…b5 ]

25.Bf4+ Kd7, 26.Rd1 Rcf8, 27.Ng2 Qc5,

28.Ne3 Qb5+, 29.Qxb5 axb5, 30.exd5 exd5, 31.Rh1 Rf7, 32.Rh4 Rfg7,

33.Nf5 Ke6, 34.Nxg7+ Rxg7, 35.Rh5 Kd7, 36.Kb3 Kc8, 37.Rh6 Rd7,

38.Rf6 Rg7, 39.Rf8+ Kd7, 40.Kb4 Ke7, 41.Rh8 Ke6, 42.Kc5 Kf5, 43.Re8

Rd7, 44.Re5+ Kf6, 45.Rg5 Ke6, 46.Be3 Re7 47.Rxg4, 1-0.

II. Very Old Gambits :

The Captain Evans’ Gambit and the King’s Gambit are two great openings

still playable at top levels. Now, 4 examples played by French gambiteers :

S. MORIN (ICCF 2400) – “ Dr ZEN ”,

corres. 2003

Evans Gambit [ C52 ]

1.e4 e5, 2.Nf3 Nc6, 3.Bc4 Bc5, 4.b4 Bxb4, 5.c3 Ba5, 6.d4 d6, 7.Qb3 Qd7,

8.dxe5 [ 8.a4 ; 8.0-0 ; 8.Nbd2, GMI Larry Christiansen, Inside Chess, 25-26/1996 and page 86

of Play The Evans Gambit by Tim Harding & Bernard Cafferty (1997).]

8. . . . Bb6

(27)

0-0 ! ? (Jozsef Palkovi) Qe6, 13.Nc4 Nf7, 14.Nh4 g6, 15.Rd2 Bd7, 16.Rxd7 ! Qxd7, 17.Rd1 Qg4, 18.Nf5 gxf5, 19.Nxb6 +-, Kuzanov - Slodinsky, corres. 1992-94. ]

11.Nxe5

[ 11.Qb4 ; 11.Qc2 ]Play The Evans Gambit (Harding & Cafferty, 1997) : " 11.Nxe5 ! An ingenious pseudo-sacrifice of the queen, apparently first proposed by Levenfish ". Italienische Partie und Evans Gambit of J. Palkovi, 2001 : " 11.Nxe5 ! Dieser Zug bietet die besten Chancen fur den Anziehenden. "

11…Bxf2+, 12.Ke2 Nxb3, 13.axb3 Bh4,

[ 13…Bb6 ! ? N ]

14.Ndf3 Bf6,

[ 14…Bd8, 15.Nxd7 Bxd7, 16.Ne5 ]

15.Nxd7 Bxd7, 16.e5 Be7,

See Diagram.

17.Bc1 !?

N [ Estrin - Skrovina, corres. 1959-60 : 17.Nd4 Bxa3, 18.Rxa3 Ke7, 19.b4 Nh6, 20.Rha1 Ng4, 21.Nf3 Bc6, 22.Rxa7 Rxa7, 23.Rxa7 Rb8, 24.Ra5 b6, 25.Ra7 Rb7, 26.Nd4 Bxg2, 27.Nf5+ Kd7, 28.e6 fxe6, 29.Bb5+ Kc8, 30.Ra8+ Rb8, 31.Ba6+ Bb7, 32.Ne7+ Kd7, 33.Bb5+ Kxe7, 34.Rxb8 Bd5, 35.Rg8 Nxh2, 36.Rxg7+ Kd8, 37.Rd7+ Kc8, 38.Rxh7 Ng4, 39.c4 Be4, 40.Re7 e5, 41.Re8+ Kb7, 42.Bd7 Nf6, 43.Rxe5 Nxd7,44.Rxe4 Nb8, 45.Kd3 Kc6, 46.Kd4, 1-0. ]

17…a6, 18.Rd1

[ 18.Be3 ! ? Nh6, (18…f6, 19.Rhd1 Bg4, 20.e6 ! ? Bd6, 21.h3 Bf5, 22.g4 Bg6, etc.) 19.Rhd1 Rd8, 20.Bxh6 gxh6 ]18…Rd8, 19.Be3 Bf5, 20.Rxd8+

[ a) 20.b4 Rxd1, 21.Rxd1 h5, 22.b5 axb5, 23.Bxb5+ c6, 24.Bd3 ; b) 20.Rac1 c6, 21.b4 f6, 22.e6 Rd6, 23.Bb3 g5, 24.Rxd6 Bxd6, 25.Nxg5 fxg5, 26. Bd4 Bg4+, 27.Kd3 Bf5+, 28.Ke2 = ; c) 20.Rd4 Rxd4, 21.Nxd4 Be4, 22.Rf1 f6, 23.Rf4 Bxg2, 24.Rg4 fxe5, 25.Rxg2 exd4, 26.Bxd4 Bf6, 27.Rxg7 Bxd4, 28.cxd4 Ne7, 29.Be6 ; d) 20.Rd2 Rxd2+, 21.Kxd2 c6, 22.Bd3 Bxd3, 23.Kxd3 f6, 24.e6 Bd6 ]

20…Bxd8, 21.Nd4 Bg6 ?

[ 21…Bg4+ ]

22.Bd5 ! c6,

[ 22…c5, 23.Nf3 ! c4, (23…b6, 24.Rxa6 Ne7, 25.Bc4) 24.bxc4 Ne7, 25.Bxb7 a5, 26.Ba6 f6, 27.Bd4 ]

23.Nxc6 !

bxc6, 24.Bxc6+ Ke7,

(24…Kf8, 25.Bc5+ Ne7, 26.Rxa6)

25.Rxa6 f6, 26.Bc5+ Ke6,

(26…Kf7, 27.Bd5+ Ke8, 28.e6 ! +-)

27.Bb5+ Kxe5, 28.Bd7 f5, 29.Bd4+, 1-0.

(28)

M. SCHAUB (2060) – P. KUNTZ (2050), France 2002

King’s gambit [ C36 ]

1.e4 e5, 2.f4 exf4, 3.Nf3 d5, 4.exd5 Nf6, 5.Bb5+ c6, 6.Qe2+ Qe7, 7.dxc6

Qxe2+, 8.Kxe2 bxc6, 9.Ba4 Bd6, 10.Re1 0-0, 11.Kf1 Bg4, 12.Ne5 Bxe5,

13.Rxe5 Nbd7, 14.Re1 c5,

[ 14...Rae8, 15.Bxc6 Rxe1+, 16.Kxe1 Re8+, 17.Kf2 ]

15.d3 g5?! 16.Nc3 h6, 17.h4 Rfe8, 18.Bd2 Kg7, 19.hxg5 hxg5, 20.g3 !?

20…Bh3+, 21.Kg1

[ 21.Kf2? Ng4+, 22.Kg1 Rxe1+, 23.Rxe1 Nde5-+ ]

21...f3,

[ 21...fxg3, 22.Bxg5± ]22.Bc6 Bg2, [ 22...Rab8, 23.Rxe8 Nxe8, 24.Ne4 ]

23.Bxa8 Rxa8,

[ 23...Rh8? 24.Bxf3 Bxf3, 25.Bxg5+- ]24.Bxg5 Ng4, 25.Ne4 Rh8,

26.Bh4 Nde5, 27.Nf2 Nxf2, 28.Rxe5

[ 28.Kxf2 Ng4+, 29.Kg1 Bh3, 30.Rf1 Bxf1, 31.Rxf1 f2+, 32.Rxf2 Nxf2, 33.Kxf2 ]28...Ng4?? [ 28...Nh3+, 29.Kh2 Nf2, 30.Rg5+ Kf8, 31.Rxc5 Ng4+, 32.Kg1 Rh6, 33.Rc4 Bh3, 34.Rxg4 Bxg4, 35.Re1+- ]

29.Rg5+, 1-0.

M. SCHAUB – S. MILUTINIVIC (2000),

France

King’s Gambit [ C34 ]

1.e4 e5, 2.f4 exf4, 3.Nf3 Nf6, 4.e5 Nh5, 5.Qe2 Be7, 6.d4 0-0, 7.g4 fxg3,

8.hxg3 Nxg3, 9.Qh2 Nxh1, (See Diagram)

(29)

M. SCHAUB – P. HERB (2345), France

King’s Gambit [ C34 ]

1.e4 e5, 2.f4 exf4, 3.Nf3 d6, 4.Bc4 b6 !? 5.d4 g5, 6.h4 g4, 7.Ng5 Nh6,

8.Bxf4 Bg7, 9.0-0 0-0, 10.Qd3 Nc6, 11.c3 Ne7, 12.Bd5 ?

[ 12Nd2/Na3,

with Rf2 and Raf1 ] 12…Nxd5, 13.exd5 Nf5, 14.Bg3 Qf6, 15.Na3 Qg6,

16.Rae1 a6, 17.Ne4 Qh5, 18.Nc2 Nxh4, 19.Bxh4 Qxh4, 20.Ng3 f5 !

21.Ne2 Bh6, 22.g3 Qh3 ! 23.Rf2 f4 ! 24.Rh2 f3, 25.Rxh3 f2+, 26.Kf1

fxe1=Q+, 27.Kxe1 gxh3, 0-1.

Now, a fine idea by Shirazi versus the same gambit :

C. KENNAUGH (2290) - IM K. SHIRAZI (2440),

Cappelle-la-Grande,

2003

King’s Gambit

1.e4 e5, 2.f4!? f5!!? 3.exf5 e4, 4.Qh5+ Ke7, 5.d3 Nf6, 6.Qg5 h6, 7.Qh4

d5, 8.g4 Kf7, 9.dxe4 h5! 10.e5 hxg4, 11.Qg5 Nbd7, 12.Be2 Rh5, 13.Qg6+

Kg8, 14.exf6 Nxf6, 15.Bxg4 Rh6, 16.Qg5 Be7, 17.Bf3 Ne4, 18.Qg2 Bh4+,

19.Kf1 Bxf5, 20.Be3 Qf6, 21.c3 Re8, 22.Nd2 Nxc3, 23.bxc3 Rxe3, 24.Ne2

Rg6, 25.Ng3 Bd3+, 26.Kg1 Qb6, 27.Qf2 Bxg3, 28.hxg3 Rxg3+, 29.Kh2

Rexf3, 30.Qxb6 Rh3+, 31.Kg2 Rfg3+, 32.Kf2 cxb6, 33.Rxh3 Rxh3,

34.Re1 Rh2+, 35.Ke3 Bf5, 36.a3 Rh3+, 37.Kd4 Kf7, 38.Kxd5 Rxc3,

39.Nc4 Be6+, 40.Rxe6 Rxc4, 41.f5 Rc5+, 42.Ke4 Ra5, 0-1.

For a little-known gambit game with a hypermodern idea

of Qf3 in the King´s gambit... see my [Dany Sénéchaud] article

“Les échecs hypermodernes selon le MI G. Welling”

(30)

R. RETI - J. Le GRIX De La SALLE

Bordeaux, 1924, February, the 15th, Simultaneous

1.e4 e5, 2.f4 exf4, 3.Qf3!?

[Breyer and Reti]

3...Bc5,

(3...d5!)

4.Ne2

d6, 5.d4 Bb6, 6.Bxf4 Ne7, 7.Nbc3 Nbc6, 8.0-0-0 0-0, 9.Be3 f5, 10.Nf4

fxe4, 11.Nxe4 Nf5, 12.Bc4+ Kh8, 13.Qh5 Qe8, 14.Rhe1 Qxh5, 15.Nxh5

Nxe3, 16.Rxe3 Bf5, 17.c3 Ne5, 18.Be2 Ng4, 19.Rg3 Bxe4, 20.Rxg4 Bg6,

21.Nf4 Bf5, 22.Rg3 c6, 23.Bd3 d5, 24.Bxf5 Rxf5, 25.Ne6 g6, 26.Rf3 Rxf3,

27.gxf3 Bd8, 28.Re1 Bh4, ½-½.

[ from an old issue of French chessmag´ : "Bulletin d´Aquitaine" ]

*

More informations on gambits : Mieux Jouer Aux Echecs,

http://www.mjae.com. My book on Emil Diemer and B.-D.G.,

Diemer-Duhm gambit, Latvian gambit, Bogart gambit,

Fajarovicz gambit, Boden gambit, etc. [ and Chess history, Chessbooks... ]

(31)

The Shaviliuk Gambit

by Tim Sawyer

A reader asked, “Can anyone tell me anything about the Shaviliuk Gambit?”

1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 e5?!

The gambit 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 e5?! is named after Shaviliuk in Schiller's book

Gambit Chess Openings

on page 199. He does not give any further analysis,

though. This is given as a variation of the Veresov Opening. The name

is spelled also Shavliuk, Shavilyuk, etc.

Two of Chess Digest's books on the Veresov Opening mention it. The earlier

one by Mike Richards/Ken Smith 1984 cites it on page 7 giving the entire

game from Moscow 1960 of Hachaturov-Shavlyuk where Black won in

34. The main line follows this: 3.dxe5 d4 4.Nb5 c5 5.e3 a6!

This is the earliest game that I have seen with this opening, so the name is

appropriate. There have been no more known examples of this opening by

the same player. So if a significant player popularized this gambit, the name

might change.

The revision version on this book 1994 (by Ken Smith and John Hall) gives

just the first 16 moves of that game. But the authors also find an

(32)

Actually the gambit goes back long before Shavilyuk or Veresov. MCO-2

(1913) covers it under "Queen's Knight Opening" on page 107, columns 7

and 8. Some lines are given, but no games are cited. The very fact that it

is mentioned means that it is likely that it actually occurred in some games

by J.H. White, one of the original MCO founders. He was a lover of 1.Nc3

and apparently regularly played 2.d4.

In my database, I have 48 games with this gambit. My own analysis on this

opening indicates that it is almost playable. The main line is sound, but some

of the early variations look to slightly favor White.

Enjoy!

Tim Sawyer

Shaviliuk Gambit Games

a note from Clyde Nakamura

I post ed 80 Shavi l i uk Gambi t ( 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e5) games i n t he f i l es sect i on under t he f i l e name shavl i uk. cbv a compr essed chessbase f i l e. Best Regar ds

(33)

Two games from the 2005 BDO Chess Tournament

Submi t t ed by Rober t

BDO Meestertoernooi; Haarlem; 2005;

Round 3

White:

Jonkman, Harmen

Black:

Gaprindashvili, Nona; 1/2-1/2

1.e4 b6 2.d4 Bb7 3.Nd2 e6 4.Ngf3 g6 5.Bd3

Bg7 6.c3 d6 7.Nf1 Nd7 8.Ng3 Ne7 9.h4 h6

10.Bd2 a6 11.b4 c5 12.Rb1 Qc7 13.a4 e5

14.bxc5 bxc5 15.h5 g5 16.d5 c4 17.Bc2 a5

18.Be3 Ba6 19.O-O Nc5 20.Nh2 O-O 21.Ng4

Rfb8 22.Qf3 Bc8 23.Nf6+ Kf8 24.Nh7+ Kg8

25.Nf6+ Kf8 26.Nh7+ Kg8

1/2-1/2

Diagram xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAfter 8. Ng3

BDO Meestertoernooi; Haarlem; 2005; Round 5

White:

Ris, Robert

Black:

Gaprindashvili, Nona; 0-1

1.e4 b6 2.d4 Bb7 3.Nc3 e6 4.Bd3 g6 5.Nf3 Bg7

6.Bg5 Ne7 7.Qd2 h6 8.Be3

d6 9.O-O Nd7 10.a4 a6 11.Ne2 Nf6 12.Ng3

(Diagram)

12. . . . Ng4 13.Bf4 e5 14.dxe5 dxe5

15.Be3 O-O 16.Rfd1 Qe8 17.h3 Nxe3 18.Qxe3

Nc8 19.Bc4 Nd6 20.Bd5 Rd8 21.Bxb7 Nxb7

22.Qc3 Qe7 23.b4 Rd6 24.Qc4 Ra8 25.Rxd6

Qxd6 26.Ra3 Na5 27.Qc3 Nc6 28.Rb3 Bf8

29.b5 axb5 30.axb5 Nd4

31.Nxd4 exd4 32.Qd2 Ra2 33.Rf3 Bg7

After 12. Ng3

34.Nf1 Qe5 35.Qd3 Qe6 36.h4 h5 37.g3 Rb2

38.c4 dxc3 39.Qd8+ Kh7 40.Qxc7 c2

41.Rxf7 Qxf7

0-1

(34)

Nimzo-Larsen Attack

By Tim Sanders tsanders12" <[email protected]

I have been studying the

Nimzo-Larsen attack (1.b3)

and I thought I would try it

in a non-rated, casual over-the-board game, before trying it in a rated internet

game. My opponent was visiting, and we had never played against each other before.

Dunnington calls the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack, "more conservative than 1.b4" (

but what isn't!

TS

), and gives several examples in his book,

Winning Unorthodox Openings. Schiller is less kind, saying it is "not

fully respectable" (in his book, Unorthodox Chess Openings.)

Unlike many Nimzo-Larsen games, in the following I never get to fully utilize my

Bishop at b2, but it is certainly a factor. One cannot deny the power of the b2

bishop combined with the Queen at c3 (move 21). Certainly, this causes Black to be

very careful, and perhaps to use a bit too much time, though, at that point, Black is

probably already beat.

As always, comments on the opening, or game, are appreciated.

Sanders,T (1987) - Fuqua,A (1899) [A01]

Casual Game, 2005, G30

1.b3 e5

Black replies quickly. He has either seen the opening before (1..e5 is probably the 'best' reply), or is just ignoring it..

2.Bb2

The next natural move in the Nimzo-Larsen Attack

2...Nc6

3.e4

(e3 is the usual move here, but e4 is more aggressive in my opinion )

3..Nf6 4.d3

(Not perhaps the best move, but it seems to puzzle Black, as he burns quite a bit of time before replying.)

4...d5 5.exd5 Qxd5

(35)

Ozveren played 5..Nxd5..Tunali-Ozveren. Kudasi: Turquie, Round 8, 2004.03.04. At move 5, We are out of the book, and out of the database (my database has no games like this!) This is the beauty of playing UCO!

6.Nc3 Bb4

(pins my Knight, a basic move. We are still feeling each other out. )

7.Nge2

(ala' Alapin?)

7...Bxc3+ 8. Nxc3 Qa5 9.Be2 Bd7 10. 0-0 Nd4 11.Bf3

(a wasted move? No, it should encourage Black to castle long, part of my strategy, i.e., that he never develops)

11...c6 12.Ne4 Nxe4 13.Bxe4 Qb4? 14.c3 Qf8 15.cxd4 f5 16.Qh5+

Time to get aggressive!

16...g6 17.Qg5 Rg8 if 17..fxe4 then Qxe5+

18.Bf3 h6 19.Qe3 e4 20.dxe4 f4 21.Qc3

Lets line up the Queen in front of my bishop, that should put some pressure on Black!

21. . . . Qd6 22.Rad1 Qe7 23.Rfe1

Bh3?

A blunder! Black must be getting desperate. . . time pressure?

24.gxh3 Rc8 25.d5 Qg5+ 26.Kh1 Rf8 27.d6 Rd8

(setting a trap! )

28.Rd5 Rd7

Though short on time, Black still realizes that 28..cxRook is a mate in 3! And thus avoids my trap.

(36)

Owen’s Defence

By Tim Sanders tsanders12" <[email protected]

In this game, I encounter another UCO player! For some reason, I played a

standard 1.e4 opening. My higher-rated opponent surprises me with the

Owen

Defence

(1.e4 b6), about which Schiller comments in his UCO book, "..White comes

out on top with accurate play." I know the Owen has a lot of proponents here in the

group and hope some members will reply with comments, as I am not that familiar

with it. I think, in looking back, it was not the opening that beat me, but my

failure to take advantage of it and control the center. I also made a few

questionable moves, most under time pressure. In particular, my 65.g4 attempt to

open up a little, and 66.hxg4.. these were 2 “not very good moves” I think. But, I

feel I played a good game against an opponent who is rated over 200 pts higher

than I am.

Comments on the Owen Defence, or my game are always appreciated.

Tim (1923) - Jessie (2187)

2005 G15

0-1

1.e4 b6

The Owen Defence! My opponent is playing Unorthdox!

2.Nf3

I'm not real

familiar with the Owen Defence, but I think 2.d4 or e5 would be better..

2...Bb7 3.Nc3

3. . . . e6 4.Bd3 Bc5

Szilagyi-Aloni, Tel Aviv 1966 (1/2-1/2) is the only matching game in my database. But it continued with 4..Ne7

5.0-0 Nf6 6.Qe2 Nc6

(Diagram)

(37)

(I'm not sure, but I think I may be slightly ahead of my higher-rated opponent

)

17...Bd6 18.Nxd6 cxd6 19.Qc4 Rf8 20.d5 Ne7 21.Rd1

(Qd3 would have been better)

21...a6 22.Qb4

(Qd3 would still be better! )

22...b5 23.a4 Rb8 24.Rd2 a5

25.Qb3 b4 26.cxb4 Rxb4 27.Qd3

(Now my slight lead, if it was ever there, is gone.. and the game seems to be about even. )

27...Rxa4 28.Rc1 Qb6 29.b3? Rb4 30.Rc3

(Two questionably weak moves in a row on my part.

30...a4

A small mistake by my foe? 30..f5 is much better

31.bxa4 Rxa4 32.Rb3 Qa7 33.Rdb2 Qc7 34.Rb7 Qc1+ 35.Kh2 Ra1 36.Rb1

Rxb1 37.Rxb1 Qc7 38.Qb5 Rc8 39.Nd2 Kg7 40.Rb2 h5 41.f3 f5 42.Bf2 f4

43.Ra2 Rb8 44.Qd3 Rb4 45.Rc2 Qa5 46.Qc3 Qb5 47.Kg1 Ra4 48.Nc4

(See Diagram: Is black’s next move justifiable? – Associate Editor)

(38)

48 . . . Nxd5?!

49.exd5 Qxd5 50.Nb6 Qd1+ 51.Be1 Ra1 52.Kf1 Nh6 53.Nxd7

At this point I have slight time advantage of 5.5 m v. 3.5m At this point I have slight time advantage of 5.5 m v. 3.5m

53...Nf5 54.Kf2

53...Nf5 54.Kf2 Ne3 55.R

Ne3 55.Re2 Qd4

e2 Qd4 56.Qxd4

56.Qxd4

Trading Queens seemed like the thing to do, but I don't like the idea of

Trading Queens seemed like the thing to do, but I don't like the idea of his pawn advancinghis pawn advancing so far.

so far.

56...exd4 57.Nb6 Rb1 58.Nc8 d5

56...exd4 57.Nb6 Rb1 58.Nc8 d5 59.Ne7?

59.Ne7?

(Rd2 is much, much (Rd2 is much, much better)better)

59...Kf6

60.Nc6 Nd1+ 61.Kf1 d3 62.Rd2 Ne3+ 63.Kf2

Though running short on time, I seeThough running short on time, I see that Kg1 would probably mate me in 4 (or

(39)

65.g4

(time to get (time to get aggressive?)aggressive?)

65...hxg4 66.hxg4

(I think fxg4 would(I think fxg4 would have been better? But does anyone

have been better? But does anyone agree?)agree?)

66...Ra3 67.Nb5 Rb3 68.Nc7 Rc3

69.Na6 Ke5 70.Nb4 Kd4

69.Na6 Ke5 70.Nb4 Kd4 71.Kg1 Kc4 72.Nc6 Kc5 7

71.Kg1 Kc4 72.Nc6 Kc5 73.Na5 Kd6 74.Nb7+ Ke7

3.Na5 Kd6 74.Nb7+ Ke7

75.Rh2

(Kf2 is better in hindsight, but we are both moving pretty quickly.)(Kf2 is better in hindsight, but we are both moving pretty quickly.)

75...Rc1 76.Kf2 d4 77.Rh7+ Kf8 78.Rh8+

75...Rc1 76.Kf2 d4 77.Rh7+ Kf8 78.Rh8+ Kg7 79.Rh5 Kg6 80.Nd6 Rc2+ 81.Kg1

Kg7 79.Rh5 Kg6 80.Nd6 Rc2+ 81.Kg1

Re2 82.Bb4 Rg2+ 83.Kh1

(the only move here) (the only move here)

83...Rb2 84.Ne4 Rxb4 ouch!

85.Rxg5+ Kf7 86.Rc5 Rb6 87.Rc7+ Ke8 88.Rc8+ Ke7 89.Rc7+ Kf8 90.Rc8+

Kg7 91.Rc7+ Kg6 92.Rd7 Nc2 93.Kg2 Rb1 94.Rd6+

Kg7 91.Rc7+ Kg6 92.Rd7 Nc2 93.Kg2 Rb1 94.Rd6+ Kf7 95.Rf6+ Kg7 96.Rxf4

Kf7 95.Rf6+ Kg7 96.Rxf4

My time advantage is gone, we both have less

My time advantage is gone, we both have less than 2 minutes at this point.than 2 minutes at this point.

96...Ra1 97.Kg3 Rg1+ 98.Kf2 Rh1 99.Kg2 Rc1 100.Nd2

96...Ra1 97.Kg3 Rg1+ 98.Kf2 Rh1 99.Kg2 Rc1 100.Nd2 Rd1 101.Ne4

Rd1 101.Ne4

Ne3+ 102.Kh2 d2

(40)

(Drats! I knew that pawn would be trouble, oh well, got

(Drats! I knew that pawn would be trouble, oh well, got to take it now.)to take it now.)

103. Nxd2 Rxd2+

104.Kg3 Nf1+ 105.Kh4

(Kh3 allows mate! )(Kh3 allows mate! )

105...Kg6 106.g5 Rh2+ 107.Kg4

(my only(my only move)

move)

107...Ne3+ 108

107...Ne3+ 108.Kg3 Kxg5

.Kg3 Kxg5 109.Rf5+ Nx

109.Rf5+ Nxf5+

f5+ 110.Kxh2

110.Kxh2

(I know I'm beat, but(I know I'm beat, but I would rather lose on time than get checkmate

I would rather lose on time than get checkmated. d. I know, a loss is a loss, but that's how II know, a loss is a loss, but that's how I felt at the time.)

felt at the time.)

110...d3 111.f4+ Kg4 112.Kg1 Kf3 113.Kh2

110...d3 111.f4+ Kg4 112.Kg1 Kf3 113.Kh2 d2 114.Kh3 d1Q 115.Kh2 Qe2+

d2 114.Kh3 d1Q 115.Kh2 Qe2+

116.Kh3

116.Kh3 Qg2#

Qg2# 0-1

0-1

Well, so much for losing on time.

Well, so much for losing on time. My highly-rated opponent pays me the ultimateMy highly-rated opponent pays me the ultimate compliment, she declines to play again. Overall, I think this was one of

compliment, she declines to play again. Overall, I think this was one of the best games Ithe best games I have ever played in my life, even though I lost.

have ever played in my life, even though I lost. - T.S. - T.S.

(41)

Keoni-Hiva with and without the Gambit

By Antonio Garcia and G. K. Gifford

Here is a game using the

Keoni-Hiva gambit

, I blundered at move 22, but

was comforted by the fact that my opponent made a more terrible

blunder...comments are welcome. –

Antonio [email protected]

Associate Editor Comment: The Gambit-declined (or avoided) method appears in the following game. Seems to me that we end up with one-move delayed Bird’s Opening. In the second game we have quite a different situation with the white f, e, and d-pawns getting quickly ripped off the board…. But not to worry, it is all part of the plan. - gkg

Event : " uChess r at ed" www. uchess. com 2005. 10. 21

White

antonius (1520)

Black

_{jay36 (1744)}

1-0 3 minute game

Keoni-Hiva Formation, without the Gambit

1. e2-e3 d7-d5

2. f2-f4 c7-c5

3. Ng1-f3 Nb8-c6

4. Bf1-d3 Bc8-e6

5. O-O Qd8-b6

6. Kg1-h1 Ng8-f6

7. f4-f5 Be6-d7

8. Qd1-e1 e7-e6

9. f5xe6 Bd7xe6

10. c2-c3 Bf8-d6

11. Bd3-c2 O-O

12. d2-d4 Be6-g4

13. Nb1-d2 Bg4xf3

14. Nd2xf3 Ra8-e8

15. Qe1-h4 c5xd4

16. e3xd4 Bd6-e7

17. Bc1-g5 g7-g6

18. Bg5xf6 Be7xf6

19. Qh4xf6 Re8-e6

20. Qf6-g5 Nc6-e7

21. Nf3-e5 f7-f6

22. Rf1xf6 Rf8xf6

23. Qg5-h6 Ne7-f5

24. Ne5-d7 Qb6xb2

25. Nd7xf6 Re6xf6

26. Ra1-c1 Qb2xc3

27. Bc2xf5 Qc3xd4

28. Rc1-c8 Kg8-f7

After 9. . . . Bxe6

29. Qh6xh7 1-0

(42)

(5) Gifford,G

−

Astur,J [A00]

Keoni-Hiva Gambit Accepted

I played my first Keoni-Hiva Gambit (the following game) on the same day I had first read about (August 30th, 2005). I read about the aggressive gambit in an article by Clyde Nakamura. Very dynamic… I could not resist giving it a try.

Internet, Yahoo, 30.08.2005 [Keoni

−

Hiva Gambit] A 15

−

minute game.

1.e3 e5 2.¤c3 ¤f6 3.f4

XABCDEFGHY

8rs

nlw

qkv

l t

r(

7z

ppz

pp+pz

pp'

6 + + s

n +&

5+-+-z

p-+-%

4 + + z

P +$

3+ s

N z

P-+-#

2Pz

PPz

P-+Pz

P"

1t

R v

LQm

KLs

NR!

xabcdefghy

3...exf4 4.¤f3 fxe3 5.¥d3 exd2+ 6.¥xd2 ¤c6 7.0-0 ¥c5+ 8.¢h1 0-0

XABCDEFGHY

8r+lw

q t

rk+(

7z

ppz

pp+pz

pp'

6 +n+ s

n +&

5+ v

l + + %

4-+-+-+-+$

3+ s

NL+N+ #

2Pz

PPv

L-+Pz

P"

1t

R-+Q+R+K!

xabcdefghy

(43)

9.¤g5 h6 10.¤ge4 ¥b6 11.¦xf6 gxf6 12.£h5 f5 (diagram)

XABCDEFGHY

8r+lw

q t

rk+(

7z

ppz

pp+p+ '

6-v

ln+-+-z

p&

5+-+-+p+Q%

4-+-+N+-+$

3+ s

NL+ + #

2Pz

PPv

L-+Pz

P"

1t

R-+-+-+K!

xabcdefghy

Black tells the hostile Knight to vacate the premise; but the stubborn stallion does not budge. Instead I bring my remaining Rook over to the critical f-file. My

Knight is captured, but immediately replaced by the other. F6 is a key square in this fight.

13.¦f1 fxe4 14.¤xe4 d5 15.¤f6+

XABCDEFGHY

8r+lw

q t

rk+(

7z

ppz

p +p+ '

6-v

ln+ s

N z

p&

5+-+p+-+Q%

4-+-+-+-+$

3+-+L+-+-#

2Pz

PPv

L-+Pz

P"

1+-+-+R+K!

xabcdefghy

15...¢g7 16.£xh6# 1-0

(44)

The

By Gambit Grundy and G.K. Gifford

Gambit Grundy supplied the following moves:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d5 3.exd5 Bd6 4.Nc3 Nf6 5. Bc4?

(Bb5+ and d4 both appear to be logical continuations – g.k.g)

5. . . . 0-0 6. 0-0 e4 7. Nd4 Bxh2+

(Diagram)

“If the game continues as follows:

8.Kxh2 Ng4+ 9.Kg3,

how should black best proceed? Note: If 9. Kg1 Qh4 with mate or heavy material loss to follow.”

– Gambit Grundy

Some analysis indicates that

9. . . . Qd6+ 10. f4

(forced)

exf3+ 11. Kxf3

Qf6+

(following figure) is a forcing line that wins for black – g.k.g

(45)

In looking further into this Elephant issue I also found an " Elephant Trap" in the Queen’s Gambit (so we won’t discuss it in this article… I was aware of it but never knew it by that name. And I found an Elephant's Gambit knight trap which was used by Bill Wall on at least one occasion (following moves and diagram).

In the following game Bill Wall, as black, trapped a Knight.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d5 3. Nc3 d4 4. Nd5 c6

and the white horse has nowhere to go.

We will conclude with two more games.

The Bank Pocztowy SA Open; Bydgoszcz, Poland, 1999

ECO C40

Round 5

0-1

White

Ziolkowski, D

(2123) Black

Pavlenko, O

(2295)

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d5 3. d4 dxe4 4. Nxe5 Bd6 5. Nc4 Nf6 6. Be2 Nc6 7. Be3

O-O 8. O-O Nd5 9. Nc3 Nxe3 10. fxe3 Qg5 11. Nxe4 Bxh2+ 12. Kxh2 Qh4+

13. Kg1 Qxe4 14. Bd3 Qg4 15. Rf4 Qxd1+ 16. Rxd1 Be6 17. c3 f5 18. Rdf1 g6

19. b3 Kg7 20. e4 fxe4 21. Rxf8 Rxf8 22. Rxf8 Kxf8 23. Bxe4 Bxc4 24.

bxc4 Nd8 25. Kf2 b6 26. Ke3 Ke7 27. Bd5 Ne6 28. Ke4 Kd6 29. Bxe6 Kxe6

30. g4 h5 31. g5 h4 32. Kf4 h3 33. d5+ Kd6 34. Kg3 Kc5 35. Kxh3 Kxc4 36.

Kg4 Kxc3 37. Kf4 Kd4 0-1

(46)

We have looked at a few situations in which black has won. Here is a case-in-point, from a British Championship, where white wins.

Paul Motwani vs. John Rogers

1989 British Championship

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d5 3 exd5 Bd6 4 d4 e4 5 Ne5 Nf6 6 Nc3 0-0 7 Bc4!? 7...Nbd7

8 Nxd7 Bxd7 9 Bg5 h6 10 Bh4 g5 11 Bg3 Bxg3 12 hxg3 Ng4?

(diagram)