ENVIRONMENTAL PORT INDEX

(1)

ENVIRONMENTAL PORT INDEX

Presented on behalf of:

Gun Rudeberg, Port of Stockholm

Ellen Kaasik, Port of Tallinn

Andrej Vatterrott, Port of Rostock

Markku Alahäme, Port of Turku

Ulf Sonesson, Port of Trelleborg

Liselotte Rørup, Port of Kalundborg

Axel Grelland, Port of Oslo

Kaarina Vuorivirta, Port of Helsinki

by

(2)

Introduction

“Environmental shipping and port indexes

are of paramount importance for several

large ports and there will be a unique

opportunity for the Baltic Sea Region to

take the lead and provide an excellent

show case for other maritime regions”

(3)

Port Index and the CBSS project

The Port Index should act as a catalyst and indicator

of good practice in environmental management of

port and shipping interests:

• Reduce ship-borne air pollution at sea, in ports and in

cities

• Reduce nutrient inputs from ships at sea to a zero

level

• Create a joint strategy for differentiated port dues

• Create pilot projects at full scale as best practice

examples

• Create a network for collaboration between

stakeholders to achieve the goals

(4)

Progress to date

• Completion of literature search

• Identification of potential KPIs

• Initial Group evaluation of KPIs

• Compilation of group best practice

• Data base of BPO members’ responses

• Specification for generic index model – in

progress

(5)

What is an index?

• A particular trend or condition

• A scale (of numbers) which show changes

• A numerical quantity, usually lacking units, that indicates

magnitude of….effect

• A number which, by varying around a value of (10 or 100),

enables a straightforward comparison over time in the

average value of a set of items

• CONFIDENTIALITY - COMPETITION - ANONIMITY

• MEANINGFUL - SIGNIFICANT - FEASIBLE -PRACTICABLE -

ACCEPTABLE

(6)

Port of Trelleborg

CURRENT PRACTICES WITH POTENTIAL INPUT FOR PORT

INDEX

* indicates repeated themes reported by several Partners

NOTES AND JUSTIFICATION

1 Is port certificated or registered

for Self Diagnosis Method, PERS or ISO14001?

Scope for rating EMS standard and status. Indicates standard and competence

2 Is Environmental Policy readily

available and comprehensive? Key driver of environmental management activities, programmes and practice

3 Noise*, emissions to air*

including SO_x,NO_x,PM_2.5and PM₁₀

Potential EPIs. Direct link to emissions and air quality

4 CO₂,* Use of energy, Waste

handling*,

Overall air quality*

Links with PPRISM, Waste is a high priority issue

throughout sector. Measures of sustainability.

5 Differentiated port dues* –

Based on emissions to air and waste

Considerations of incentive programmes. Bonus – Malus Systems

6 Storm water/rain water

handling and monitoring Influence on environmental condition and cargo storage

(7)

Scope of Index

Key Performance Indicators – for BALTIC

• Port and Shipping

• Operational

• Conditional

• Managerial

• Monitoring

• Reporting

List of potential KPIs

_{Examples of current good practice}

(8)

Role and status of Index

• Ports set an example

• Demonstrate standards and best practice

• Ports are catalysts for action

• Encourage culture of monitoring and

reporting

• Integration to mutual advantage

(9)

Components of Index

• Input data (Units)

• Standardization/Normalization

• Weighting to be applied?

• Source and reliability of data

• Compilation

• Evaluation

• Reporting

(10)

Specification of Index

• Ship-borne air pollution

• Port reception facilities – sewage

• Harmonization and standardization of

environmentally friendly infrastructure

• Baseline calculations of emissions in

**(Partner ports*)**

• Availability of electricity, gas, LNG*

• Economic instruments such as

(11)

Supporting studies*

(with significance to Port Index)

1. Baseline calculation of emissions

2. Demand for environmentally related

infrastructure

3. Availability of electricity, gas, LNG

4. Developments in bunker, electricity and LNG

markets

5. Analysis of existing economic instruments -

differentiated port dues

6. Scenario analysis of future trends in sustainable

shipping

7. Designs for shore-side electricity

(12)

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

• Compliance with legislation and regulation

• Continuous environmental improvement

• Control of Environmental Aspects

• „Voluntary self-regulation‟ - evidence

• Sustainable development and

environmental protection

• Shipping*

Environmental Indicators

For the Port Authority, Sector and Baltic*

(13)

Environmental condition Indicators

1. Carbon Footprint

2. Amount of waste recycled

3. Total water consumption

Consolidated Environmental Management Indicators

Existence/reference to:

1. Environmental Management Programme

2. Environmental Policy

3. Reference to ESPO Code

4. Inventory of Legislation

5. Inventory of Significant Environmental Aspects

6. Objectives and Targets

7. Training

8. Monitoring Programme

9 . Environmental Report

(14)

Stakeholders assessment

results

EPI Condition Clean Shipping Project (*33) BPA Conference (114) 1st ESPO SD Committee (17) 2nd ESPO SD Committee (11) On-line survey (114) Overall (289) Carbon dioxide emissions 3.9 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.67 3.7

Waste (excl. ships) _3.8 _4.0 _3.5 _3.8 _3.59 _3.7

Water consumption _2.9 _3.6 _3.1 _3.4 _3.43 _3.3 EPI Management Environmental Management Programme 4.6 4.0 4.3 4.6 3.85 4.3 Environmental Policy 4.5 - - 4.3 3.98 4.3 Monitoring programme 4.4 3.9 3.7 4.0 3.98 4.0 Environmental Report 4.3 3.9 - 4.3 3.81 4.1

Objectives and Targets 4.3 - - 4.2 3.86 4.1

Environmental

Training 4.1 - - 4.0 3.86 4.0

ESPO Code of Practice 3.8 - - 3.9 3.67 3.8

Inventory of Aspects 3.7 - 3.8 4.5 3.88 4.0

Inventory of

(15)

Stakeholders assessment

results

(16)

Environmental Management Indicator

Weighting

Environmental Management System

1 Environmental Monitoring Programme

1.25 Inventory of Significant Environmental Aspects

1.5 Environmental Policy

1.5 ESPO Code of Practice

0.5 Inventory of environmental legislation

1.5 Objectives and Targets

1 Environmental Training

0.75

(17)

Environmental (

pprism.espo.be)

• 125 Initial EPIs

• Operational

• Management

• Condition

• 289 feedback

(18)

Port Sources included Percentages Years Results Comments

A Corunna

(Spain) PA vehicles PA boilers

Electricity port area

4 % 7 % 89 % 2009 2008 2007 2006 1124 t CO2 1357 t CO2 1296.5 t CO2 1301 t CO2

Results reported since 2006 Reduction of 13.6 % (2006 -09)

Published in Sustainability report 2009 Antwerp

(Belgium) Stationary sources Mobile sources PA buildings Electricity Business travel Commuting 19 % 51 % 10 % 13 % 1 % 6 %

2008 34700 t CO2e Calculated from 2000 – 2008

Results presented in the GreenPorts Conference 2011, Venice

Dover

(UK) Gas Oil Refrigerant Gases Owned vehicles Electricity 23 % 2 % 1 % 74 % 2009

2008 13279 t CO2 15340 t CO2 Results reported since 2008 Reduction of 13.4 % (2008 -09) Published in their Environmental Bulletin 2009

Oslo

(Norway) Direct emissions Indirect emissions Other indirect emissions

44 % 34 % 22 %

2008

2007 1346 t CO704 t CO₂2e e Increase in 47.7% (2007 - 08) Published in the port of Oslo report: CO2 emissions for the year 2008. Rotterdam

(The

Netherlands)

Direct emissions Indirect emissions Other indirect emissions

31 % 15 % 54 %

2008

2007 29094 t CO33043 t CO2₂ Results reported since 2007 Reduction of 12 % (2007 - 08)

Published in their Annual Report 2009

Examples of best practice in

Carbon Footprint

(19)

Best Practices in

Waste management

Source Corunna Algeciras Cartagena Castellon Catalan Dover Santander Solid Waste

Organic 1099 t Total solid waste 1.3tonnes 196.64 t 1152 t 4120 kg Paper 344 t 8.82 t 1.4 t 861 kg √ 5540 kg Plastics 57 t 3.9 t 10.1 t 0.095 m3 140 kg Non-hazardous industrial waste Scrap metal 154 t 4873 kg √ Wood 3321 m3 _{165 t} _{1 m3} Electronic waste 460 kg 0.19 t 54 u √ Oil filters 0.14 t 4 u √ Hazardous waste Ink cartridges 152 u 167 u 117 u 149 u Used Oil 2400 l 1 t 10 kg 3 l √ 1.5 t Fluorescents 1201 l 160 kg 24 kg 209 u √ 80 kg Batteries 0.313 t 400 kg 499 kg 31.7 kg √ 43 u

(20)

Environmental Management Components

Average score: 7.4 (out of 10)

(21)

BPO member‟s website survey*

(Context for WP5 and CBSS)

• Presence of Environmental Information on port’s website

• Achievement of PERS/ISO or EMAS Environmental

Management Systems

• Publicly available Environmental Policy Statement

• Publication of Environmental Report

• Evidence of Environmental Monitoring

• Identified EPIs to provide evidence of trends

• Publication of data and science-based reports

• Differentiated fees/dues – Economic Instruments

(22)

Port

Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

33 Yes _{ISO 14001}Yes, Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Solutions for sorting of waste

in the ports and fixed systems for

handling waste water, grey water

and black water from the ships.

- Noise - Diesel consumption per tonne of handled goods - Emissions to air, land and water - Diesel and energy consumption - Waste management - Cooperation projects 34 Yes Yes, ISO 14001 in several terminal operators Yes No N/M N/M N/M No

The port applies an environmentally

differentiated port charge, which means that

vessels that offer good environmental performance receive a discount N/M - Onshore power supply for vessels -Rail shuttles to replace road transport - Gas recycling in conjunction with the loading and discharge of oil - The port

facilitates the use of LNG as ship fuel. - Green Bunkering to reduce the risk of oil spills.

(23)

QUESTIONS Oceania _{% YES} _{% YES}Asia Africa % YES North America % YES Latin America % YES ESPO Environmental Review 2009 (122 ports) % YES Baltic Ports (48 ports) % YES

1 Does the port website show _{Environmental Information?}

56

4

20

16

20

69

2 Does the port have an EMS?

60

20

32

28

20

48

38

3 Does the port have an _{Environmental Policy?}

72

28

36

44

28

72

46

4 Is the Environmental Policy _{made available to the public?}

36

8

12

24

16

62

27

5 Does the port publish an _{Environmental Report / Review?}

56

20

36

16

43

27

6 Is environmental monitoring _{carried out in your port?}

72

32

40

56

24

77

40

7

Has the port identified environmental indicators to monitor trends in environmental performance?

44

16

24

44

8

60

31

8

Does the port publish factual data by which the public can assess the trend of its

environmental performance?

(24)

ISSUES & ASPECTS

INDICATORS

INDEX

NOTES

1. Port Environmental

Management

•

EMS*

•

Policy

•

ESPO Code

•

Inventory of Aspects

•

Inventory of Legislation

•

Objectives* & targets*

•

KPIs* and Monitoring*

•

Training

•

Reporting

•

Infrastructure 1.00* 1.50 0.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.25 0.75 1.00 ?