• No results found

Optimizing Coding in Primary Care, Part 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Optimizing Coding in Primary Care, Part 1"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Optimizing Coding in Primary

Care, Part 1

Bill Dacey, MHA, MBA, CPC The Dacey Group, Inc.

Palm Harbor, FL

2

Learning Objectives

• Understand the financial impact of poor coding • Correct common primary care coding errors

3

Today’s Agenda

• The Role of Coding in Reimbursement • Errors

• Bundling (Light) • Modifiers

• General Considerations

4

Urban Coding Myth #1

• Correct coding equals reimbursement =NOT • Reimbursement is a function of your

understanding and response to third-party payer reimbursement policies

• You are far more likely to get paid based on what

you know rather than simply by what you do

5

Federally Identified Risk Areas

• Per the Final OIG Compliance Guidance the

Specific Risk areas outlined are:

- Coding and Billing

- Reasonable and Necessary Services - Documentation

- Improper Inducements, Kickbacks, and Referrals

Within each category further detail is provided.

6

Coding and Billing

The elements specified in the plan are:

Billing for items or services not rendered

Reasonable and necessary service

Double billing – duplicate payments

Non-covered services

Incorrect provider ID numbers

Unbundling

Modifiers

Clustering

(2)

7

What Are Your Risk Areas?

In the absence of fraud, all of the areas addressed are likely process or education issues with the exception of unbundling, clustering, and upcoding

Many of these can be addressed via data audits and attendant process reviews, typically with good result

Unbundling is a coding error, and the solution depends on who creates it

Clustering and upcoding are E/M issues (next session)

8

Current Risk Areas/Opportunities

• EHR/EMR cloning/over-use (more next session) • The trend towards technological solutions versus

“medical necessity”

• Quality reporting – Category II codes

9

Top 6 Errors (payer perspective)

Duplicate claims

Claims not covered by this payer

Bundled services

Beneficiary eligibility

Medical necessity

Non-covered services

10

You May Get Paid for What Is Payable

• It is your obligation to know how each payer

processes claims and covers services

• It is highly likely that each contract you sign

assigns this responsibility to you

• In Health Care Claims submission and processing

what you don’t know will likely hurt you financially

11

Submitting the Claim

• You may submit a claim for services, but that does not

necessarily mean you will be paid

– (i.e. preventive/cosmetic) – Just plain NOT COVERED

• Professional MD services are reported on the CMS-1500

(some still call it the “HCFA”)

– New CMS-1500 (Went into effect June 2007) – This change is primarily to allow for the 10-digit NPI #s

12

CPT

®

Coding

• YOU NEED TO OWN THIS • You need to KNOW this

• Codes range from head to toe in each coding section of CPT®

(3)

13

Category II Codes

These are tracking codes; they are designed to facilitate data collection for performance measurement.

These codes are released in January and again in July each year.

They are optional BUT now are part of Medicare’s Quality Reporting Initiative – no individual payment – but part of the quality reporting system.

14

Surgical Coding

• When can one report procedures and visits on

the same date?

• When does a coder need to utilize a modifier to

obtain accurate payment?

• What impact does the National Correct Coding

Initiative have on coding?

• What role does the RBRVS play?

15

The Surgical Package

Preop Intraoperative Postop

Global Period determined by payer [Not CMS]

Intra – OP Bundling determined by payer

Minor – day of surgery (Modifier 25 is applicable) Major – day of and day before surgery

(Modifier 57 is applicable)

Minor – 0 or 10 Major – 90 day post-op

+1 day pre-op 91 global days

16

Items NOT Included in the Surgical

Package

• Initial decision for surgery

• Other MD services (diff. spec./diff. group) • Visits unrelated to surgical diagnosis (24) • Treatment for underlying conditions • Complications following surgery (78) • Unrelated surgical procedures (79) • Unrelated critical care services (24/25) • Staged/related/distinct procedures (58/59)

17

National Correct Coding Initiative (CCI)

• Commonly referred to as “bundling”

• Created under CMS contract with Adm. Federal – early in

1996

• Saved $96 million in the 1st 6 months. • Updated quarterly

18

CCI Status Indicators

• 0 – This code is ALWAYS included in the Comprehensive code. Knowing this fact will reduce denial rates and lower aged insurance receivables.

• 1 – There may be a chance to unbundle. Only add modifiers on this component code if appropriate. Use caution, reviews are possible – are you certain you should be paid?

(4)

19

Bundling

• Two main types of bundling:

- Incidental: The relationship between one service and another, and

- Integral Component: One of the services is generally considered an integral part of a larger more comprehensive service - This is payer-specific – you need to find out

how each one does it

20

Selecting E/M Codes…

• E/M is far and away the most important group of

codes for regulatory liability concerns

• Depending on specialty – potential high revenue

impact as well

• Coding correctly requires documenting it

correctly – there is no other safe harbor…

21

Chart Audit or Pattern Monitoring

• Scope is all payers – look ahead • Triage by risk – payer mix, profile

• Focus chart intensive reviews on High Risk • Pattern monitor low-risk areas or reduce audit

size or frequency

• Customize reviews to performance 22

Documentation Issues

• Coding By Time:

– Document Counseling and Coordination of care versus Prolonged Services coding

– If 50% or more of an encounter is c/c, time can be used as a driving factor to support a higher level of service of the original code

– Just state the time and the purpose

– For prolonged – just state the nature of the extra time

– Critical Care – requires total time that day

23

Improve Processes…

• Establish Compliance and Correct Coding rates

for providers: CPT and ICD-9

• Develop “thresholds” of compliance geared to

specific educational activities

• Verify all “no bill” determinations

• Establish correct coding/reviewing rates for

coders and reviewers

24

Effective Tools

• One set of rules: Don’t forget about the other 55%

of private payers

• The Template – bridge to electronic record • Real time and the prospective review: The best

opportunity for MD education – use their own work product

(5)

25

Templates and Forms

• CMS allows but is concerned about “cloning” and

repetitive documentation

• They don’t want stamps – but rather that the MDs

will write what they did

• Don’t over-rely on these – they support

documentation – they don’t replace it

• If forms are used – avoid total repetition – mix it

up – they should reflect your patients!

26

The E/M Modifiers

• -21 – Use rarely if ever – prefer prolonged CPT codes • -24 – Unrelated E/M in a global (that you performed) • -25 – Separate, Significant, Identifiable, etc. • -32 (sometimes) – Mandated

• -57 – Initial decision to perform surgery (+10 global)

27

The Surgical Modifier

• For most providers the big issues here are: • Modifier 51 – Same site, same incision • Modifier 59 – separate site, separate incision • Modifier 58, 76, and 78

28

Own the Work, the Codes,

and the Payment Process

• Know your codes

References

Related documents

With the exception of three difficult blocks (first blocks of users nbe and jh , and third block of user nbb ) the posthoc re-analysis obviously outperforms the original

Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Manpower 2005 Annual Report 53.. Management Report on Internal Control Over

reform, Sudan Democracy First Group, Institutional Reform Series (2), 2014.. is an equal duty, and considerable scope for preventive approaches. 162 This includes a focus on

As the initial water contact angle assesses the chemical and/or physical prop- erties of the surface of biomass materials, the data sug- gest that differences in surface properties

Using data collected from questionnaires conducted in 20 urban villages and 1 urban village redevelopment neighbourhood in Guangzhou, this paper exam- ines the impact of urban

The letter contains the response of the CCIR Working Group on Privilege to comments made by stakeholders on its discussion paper entitled Privilege and Whistle-Blower Protection

The large-sample distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (M.L.E.) of the scale parameter for some discrete distributions gen- erated by Cauchy stable law are investigated.

Resumen: El presente artículo analiza las soluciones propuestas por distintos militares españoles para reparar uno de los principales problemas que afectaba a la