• No results found

Alabama Comprehensive Assessment Program (ACAP)Updates

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Alabama Comprehensive Assessment Program (ACAP)Updates"

Copied!
25
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Alabama Comprehensive Assessment Program

(ACAP)Updates

(2)

What is included in the ACAP?

The ACAP covers all Alabama State Mandated Assessments.

Even though there will not be an official report card grade this year, all

Achievement Proficiency Data, based on State Mandated Assessments, will be reported to all stakeholders.

Assessments Include (depending on Grade Levels of School)

● ACT Assessments - Schools with a Grade 12

● ACAP Summative - School with Grades 2-8

● ACAP Alternate - All Schools

● ACCESS - All Schools with an ML population of 20 or more students in the

testing grades

(3)

ACAP Summative Data

(4)

Where we were vs. Where we are

(5)

ACAP Summative Longitudinal Data

Scantron vs. ACAP Summative

(6)

READING/ ELA % OF STUDENTS SCORING AT EACH PROFICIENCY LEVEL

SCANTRON 2018 SCANTRON 2019 ACAP 2021

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

DISTRICT 43.52 36.55 18.02 1.9 DISTRICT 47.17 29.07 16.68 7.07 DISTRICT 34 46 18 2

2 2 2 44 39 16 2

3 55.26 25.21 15.8 3.72 3 46.28 29.98 15,51 8.23 3 32 49 16 3

4 41.64 33.59 21.55 3.22 4 47.1 29.3 17.84 5.76 4 35 46 17 3

5 45.6 35.1 18.08 1.31 5 49.82 25.68 16.57 7.83 5 32 48 18 2

6 31.35 36.33 20.37 1.96 6 45.72 29.11 18.25 6.92 6 39 45 15 1

7 38.78 44.89 16.09 0.24 7 64.68 20.57 9.96 4.79 7 36 43 19 2

8 35.45 48.3 15.92 0.33 8 45.6 33.04 14.92 6.44 8 20 52 25 3

Scantron vs. ACAP Longitudinal Data - Reading/ELA

(7)

Scantron vs. ACAP Longitudinal Data - Math

MATHEMATICS % OF STUDENTS SCORING AT EACH PROFICIENCY LEVEL

SCANTRON 2018 SCANTRON 2019 ACAP 2021

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

DISTRICT 35.87 43.68 18.63 1.82 DISTRICT 40.81 37.78 15.3 6.11 DISTRICT 70 26 3 1

2 2 2 73 20 5 2

3 33.96 33.8 28.25 3.99 3 35.77 33.53 22.91 7.79 3 75 21 3 1

4 24.68 44.18 20.3 0.83 4 36.03 42.82 15.71 5.44 4 77 19 3 1

5 24.18 52.54 22.4 0.89 5 32.12 46.55 15.66 5.67 5 74 22 3 1

6 28.73 53.12 17.05 1.1 6 33.22 45.58 13.71 7.5 6 67 29 4 0

7 39 49.69 10.32 0.98 7 56.39 27.65 10.98 4.98 7 68 30 2 0

8 58.86 28.22 9.84 3.08 8 55.91 27.92 11.12 5.05 8 54 42 3 1

(8)

ACAP Summative Grade Level Data English Language Arts

& Mathematics

(9)

ACAP SUMMATIVE STATE vs. DISTRICT (ALL GRADES)

% of Student in each Proficiency Level

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MATHEMATICS

MATH (all grades) LeveI I Level II Level III Level IV

State 32% 44% 18% 6%

District 70% 26% 3% 1%

ELA (all grades) LeveI I Level II Level III Level IV

State 12% 40% 38% 9%

District 34% 46% 18% 2%

(10)

ACAP Summative Student Report

What our parents will see.

(11)

STUDENT REPORT

ACAP SUMMATIVE

(front page)

Live View

(12)

STUDENT REPORT

ACAP SUMMATIVE

(back page)

(13)

ACAP Summative

Individual Student Report (ISR)

(14)

ACAP Summative

Individual Student Report (ISR)

(15)

ACAP Summative

Individual Student Report (ISR)

(16)

ACAP Alternate Data

● Administered to Students with severe cognitive disabilities

● 1:1 Teacher Student Ratio

● Teacher inputs student responses in the computer

● Aligned to updated Alabama Extended Standards

● Grades 2-8, 10 & 11 Data Views:

● Longitudinal View

(17)

READING/ ELA % OF STUDENTS SCORING AT EACH PROFICIENCY LEVEL

AAA 2018 AAA 2019 ACAP ALTERNATE 2021

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

DISTRICT 33.81 34.53 27.34 4.32 DISTRICT 28.95 38.6 27.19 5.26 DISTRICT 24 48 27 1

2 2 2 0 50 50 0

3 35 55 10 0 3 40 30 25 5 3 0 50 50 0

4 15.79 42.11 42.11 0 4 25 31.25 37.5 0 4 15 70 15 0

5 25 62.5 12.5 0 5 27.78 50 22.22 0 5 35 41 24 0

6 40 24 28 8 6 0 57.14 42.86 0 6 0 11 89 0

7 33.33 25 25 16.67 7 30.77 30.77 26.92 11.54 7 0 43 43 14

8 22.73 22.73 45.45 9.09 8 15.38 53.85 23.08 7.69 8 17 67 17 0

10 56 20 24 0 10 85.71 14.29 0 0 10 38 38 25 0

11 11 11 36 45 18 0

AAA vs. ACAP Longitudinal Data - Reading/ELA

(18)

AAA vs. ACAP Longitudinal Data - Math

MATHEMATICS % OF STUDENTS SCORING AT EACH PROFICIENCY LEVEL

AAA 2018 AAA 2019 ACAP ALTERNATE 2021

I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV

DISTRICT 33.57 30 27.14 9.29 DISTRICT 28.07 35.96 29.82 6.14 DISTRICT 16 66 18 0

2 2 2 50 50 0 0

3 40 25 25 10 3 35 30 20 15 3 60 40 0 0

4 26.32 31.58 31.58 10.53 4 25 37.5 37.5 0 4 16 68 16 0

5 35.29 29.41 23.53 11.76 5 27.78 55.56 11.11 5.567 5 12 76 12 0

6 52 20 24 4 6 7.14 64.29 28.57 0 6 0 33 67 0

7 16.67 8.33 75 0 7 38.46 11.54 46.15 3.85 7 0 43 57 0

8 22.73 22.73 27.27 27.27 8 15.38 23.08 46.15 15.38 8 0 100 0 0

10 32 60 8 0 10 42.86 57.14 0 0 10 13 88 0 0

11 11 11 10 80 10 0

(19)

ACAP ALTERNATE STATE vs. DISTRICT (ALL GRADES)

% of Student in each Proficiency Level

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MATHEMATICS

ELA (All Grades) LeveI I Level II Level III Level IV

State 23% 46% 28% 2%

District 24% 48% 27% 1%

Math (All Grades) LeveI I Level II Level III Level IV

State 15% 64% 20% 1%

District 16% 66% 18% 0%

(20)

ACT Assesments

(21)

Benchmarks: English -18 Reading - 22 Science -23 Math-22

(22)

Graduation Rate - Longitudinal

Alabama High School Federal Graduation Rate

2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 *2020-2021

Birmingham City 77% 82% 82% 84%

*2020-2021 is preliminary data that has been accepted by the ALSDE.

(23)

ACCESS Data

● Assessment given to all Multi-Lingual (ML) students to measure English Language Acquisition.

● Students are screened and Tested.

● Once student receives a score of 4.8 or higher, they no longer have to test but are still monitored by Teachers.

Data View:

● Grade Level Proficiency

(24)

2020-2021 Data - ACCESS

(25)

Thank you & Questions

Don’t let data sit idly in the platform.

Bring your data to life by identifying and using the right data to solve problems.

References

Related documents

A comprehensive assessment program at the classroom level balances formative and summative student learning information [5].. The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for

 For each question, darken the bubble corresponding to the correct option in the ORS  Marking scheme :.. +4 If only the bubble corresponding to the correct option is darkened 0

The augmented CST tests used in this study included the Algebra II and Summative High School Math test in mathematics, and the Grade 11 test in English language arts, which are

The same set of ordering points and clusters are generated by Privacy preserving Secure OPTICS algorithm for vertically partitioned data as its OPTICS algorithm does with input

We also make some progress in explaining an economic puzzle about the compensation of law enforcement agents: society relies on low powered incentives (wages and salary)

Moldflow simulation software can be used to determine the best feed system design, predict possible molding defects and suggest optimum injection molding

Butanediol expansion Crop protection products Ammonia MDI Polyamides Butanediol / PolyTHF ® Neopentylglycol Specialty amines Ethylene oxide Isononanol Coating resins

Teresa McNeil asked about the status of the model For the next meeting, Marvelyn Bucky would like members to bring in 2-3 ideas on ways to increase student success, some tangible