• No results found

Measured crop performance corn 1956

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Measured crop performance corn 1956"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Research Report No.2

December, 1956

Measured crop performance

CORN

·1956

F. W.

BRITTAIN, Research Instructor

In Charge Variety Testing

Department

of

Field Crops

N.

C. State College

(2)

Areas of Adaptation for Recommended Hybrids

e

LOCATION OF 1956 TRIALS AREA II

SOUTHERN MOUNT AINS

AREA I

NORTHERN MOUNTAINS

AREA III

PIEDMONT

AREA V

NORTHERN COASTAL PLAIN

AREAIV

SOUTHERN COASTAL PLAIN

RECOMMENDED CORN HYBRIDS FOR 1957

(Revis~d Nov. 19, 1956>

AREA I - UPPER MOUNTAIN

(see map for areas)

~llow

W.

ve ,

I t63

!I

N.C. 24

1/-g

Wood V30

U.S. 13

Y

Funk G~91

Funk G-95A

U.S. 282

Y

OeKa I b 837

2.1

None

Ye I low

U6S0 282

U.S. 13

Y

Funk G.:.95A

Funk G-134

N.C. 27

?1

Wood V26Y Wood V30 DeKa

I

b 1024

AREA I I - lO\VER

MOUNTA IN

~

DixIe 17

V

Dixie 29

(3)

U.S. 282

JI

V.P.

I.

'645

11

~

Funk G.:..704

11

Funk G-710A

DeKa I b 850

l!

D\eKa J

b

1050

~EA rI I - PIED~AQt!I

Pfister (PAG)48E

McCurdy

IOOIA

~

N.C. 27

Y

N.C. 42

Y

N.C. I03Z

Y.

Dixie '82

y

Wood V-42

II

AREA IV - SQUT.f-ERN C.oASTAl PLA IN

FULL SEASON

NaCo 31

21

Dixie 17 Coker 911 Dixie 29

Wood V..:.125\V

s/

Funk G-779N

Pf

is ter

(PAG) 653

U.S.

523VI

l/5./

N.Co 27

N.C. 42

VJood 5-2' I

21

McCurdy J002A

iI

Dixie 82

y

Pioneer

30g)\

Dixie 18

?!

Pfister (PAG)486

SHORT SEAS0N

Whi

te

N.C. 29

Y

Coke r 81 I

;.j

Coker 911 Dixie 29

Pfister (PAG)653

u.s,

523W

AREA V -

NORT~ERN C~~STAL

PLAIN

FULL SEASON

N.C. 27

N.C, 42

Dixfe 82

?J

Dixie 18'

y

DeKa I b 1050

Pioneer

309A

McCurdy IGOOA

.~/

ShORT c;EAsoN

N.C. 29 } / Dixie 29 Coker 911

Coker 8: I

Pioneer 510

JI

Pffster

(PAG)653W

N.C. 46

DeKa I b 837

U.S. '282

U.S. 578

Yet

low

~V00d \/.:.5

fA

Funk G..:.134

Funk G-704 N\cCurdy 988

P1

onee r

30' A

~

U.S. 523W

Funk G"5'2\1/ Wood

v:

125W

17

Short

season

corn in

respective areca.

y.

A Iso for si

rage.

.

~

Proposed to be

removed

from Recommended List in 1958.

Y

Should be harvested

early

to

1void

'odging of plants.

210eKalb 837 has moderate resistance to leaf blight (about equai

tv

U.S.

282)

on the bas is

of

one

year

disease readings.

(4)

-RECO/AMENOEO HY8R IDS

.-*

...

The I ists of recommended corn hybrids shown on the previous pages

e r e based on resu Its of records accumul eted from s e ve

ra

I seasons

of

testing.

These

are the

hybrids

that have consistently

excel

fed in

yield

dnd that possess

other

desirable qual

ittes.

New

hybrids are

added

to

the

recommended

I

ists

when

they

have

equa l ed the standard (a qr ouo of hybrids of known performance) in

y

Ie Id

and erect

plants

for

t'JJO

years

at two or more

locations

or three years

~t

one location.

Other agronomic,

pathologic

and

entomologlc

character-ls

t

l

cs must

be

rf'~sonab'y

satisfactory

for

the area.

Hybrids may be removed from the I

ists

when

shown

to

be

inferior

to

the standard or when seed suppl Ies

are

no

longer

of

importance

in the 5eed

trade.

PURPOSE OF CORN

YA~JETY

TESTS

1956

This rerort

presents the

data of

the North Carol

ina Of

f l

c

Ie

l Corn

Variety Tests for the 1956 season.

The objec

r

lve of these tests Is to obtain performance information

o n c o m m er c

l

a l l v e v e l le b l e hybrids a n d v a r i e t i e s a n d t o evaluate n e w e r

ones that may have

pos

s

l

b

l

l ities of equaling

or

excel I ing

those

nOVI

In

gen~ra,

production.

There

are

in

comm~rcia'

channets a large number of

corn hybrids.

These differ l n

yield,

earliness of

maturity,

disease s uscept lb lIl

t

y,

lodging or storm res Is te nce , ease of mechanical harvesting.. gra in qual ity, susceptibil ity to stored gra in insects, and many

other

characteristics.

Tt,cse

st re lns

that

are

outstanding in one or more

characteristic

may be inferior

(5)

in others.

Some entries

may

pos ses ;

many excellent

characteristics and

yet

may

perform

very

poorly due to a

single

inferior

characteristic.

Some hybrids may perform

very

we lt in one or more areas or regions and

perform

very

poorly in others.

In

order

for

the

producer

of corn to

choose

hybrids that

are

most

I

ikely to

produce high

yield and superior qua

lity

in a given area, he needs

a historica

r

record

of

yielding

abi I

ity

and

other attributes

associated

with yield

o

The crop variety

te~ting

program attempts to

obtain such

records

and

to provide a source of unbiased and dependable information which can be

used as a

basis

for deciding which

hybrids

are

most

likely

to

excel

I under

generally prevailing condlt

l

ons ,

More

than 100

hybrids

and varieties

were

tested

during the

1956

growing

season.

WHO CAN ENl'ER HYBR iDS AtNJD VARJET IES

Any

individual or firm

may

make application for having

hybrids

tested,

and in addition the Crop Variety Testing

Agency may

add

entries

about which

further

information

is desired.

Early

in

February

each

year

rules governing

the

tests for the

ensuing

year

are distributed to all previous participants and to those who make

Inquiryo

lEST LOCATIONS

Ten

locations

to represent

different

climatic

and

soi

I conditions

were

chosen and

fifteen

separate

tests

were

conduc ted,

ten

that

incl

uded

ful

I

season corns and five that

included

short season,

early

maturing

corns. The locations are shown on a map of the state.

(6)

-The testing agency r.scoqnl zes the coope re

t

lve spirit and civic

minded

service

rendered

by

the

f~rmers

who have

furnished, prepbred,

cult ivated the land and a ided in hervesting these crops.

The County Agents and

oJ-heir

assistants have contributed to the

success of these tests by aiding in locating, observing and holding field meo

r

i nqs as well as utilizing the l n Formet ion ,

The testing agency rocognizes the heir renedered by the Veterans Classes in harvesting these tests , The cont r ibut l on of Scientific Aide~

Edwi n L. Jones, who essisted in p!anting, in har ves

t

lno, cc t l ect l nq of

the data and comp l l ing the records is also recognized.

The tests were conducted on private farms end branch experiment

s ta

t tons

as

f(1I I0\'\'5 :

Area J t·!orthern N\ountain

Upper Mounta in Research stat

ion,

Dana G. Tuqma n,

Assistant Director in Charge, Ashe

County,

Laurel Springs, 1\f.C.

Area II Southern I\t\ounta ins

/v\ountain Research Station, R. R. \'/hisenhunt,

Assistant Director

in Charge.

Haywood

County,

Waynesvi I

le~

N.C.

Area

f

I

f

Piedmont

(I)

Farm

of D. G.

Harward, Stanly

County,

New London Rt. #1

County Aqe nr ,

v.

A.

Huneycutt and assistants cooperating.

(2)

Farm of

Clyde

Elmore,

Lincoln

County,

Lincolnton,

Rt 01

County Agent, George Stoudemire and assistants cooperating.

(3) Farm of Neal Hargrove, Rt. #: I Snow Camp, Alamance County

County Aoent , George Coble and ass istants cooperating.

(7)

Area IV SC1u t he r n Coe s fa J Pia in

Ful I season and short season

tests

on each of the fol lowing:

(I) Farm of VJ. A. Gooden" Bladen

County,

EI ize bot htown, Nee. County Agent" R. 80 Harper and assistants cooperat l nq;

(2) Farm of Luther A. VaiI, VJayne County, Pikevi lie, N.C. County Agent, G. fu\. Goforth and assistants cooperating.

(3) Farm of R. E. Byrdl Harnett County, Bunn Level, N. C.

County Agent, C. R. Ammons and assistants cooperating. Area V Northern Coasta I PIa in

(I) Farm of Horace Cuthrell, Camden County, Be l cr'oss , N.C.

County Agent, Sam Tuten cooperating.

(2) Farm of Henry \Vinslow" Martin Countv, VIJilliamston, N.C" County Agent,

To

8-. Brandon and assistants ccope re t

lnq ,

AGENCIES SPONSORING ENTR!ES

Cokcrs Pedigreed Seed

Company,

Hartsville,

S.C.

Cornel i Seed Coupe

ny,

101 Chouteau Avenue, St., Louis 2, 1.'lissourJ. Del\alb Aqr I c u l

t

ur-a l Association,

l

nc , , 310 No 5th

s-.,

DeKalb~

III.

Funk Brothers Seed Company, Bloomington,

Illinois

McCurdy

Seed Company, Inc., P.O. Box 576, Memphis, Tenn.

North

Carol ina Agricultural Exp ,

Station,

Raleigh, N.C.

Pfister

Associated Gro\rvers, Inc., Box, 56" Hunts vi l Ie" Alabama Pioneer Corn Company, l nc , , 221 North Na in St., Tipton, Indo

Speight Seed

Company,

Winterville, N.C.

T.Wc Wood and SonsJ II South 14th

st.,

Richmond, Va.

MA~~GEMENT O~

TEST FIELDS

Cultural pr-ac

t

lce s , such as soil preparation, date of planting,

ferti l.ization at planting, time of app l ication and amount of nitrogen

were in accord ·with good farm practice and were the same for gil entries. Planting, thinning and harvesting

were

directly supervised

by

personnel of North Carolina Agrieultl!/ral Experiment Station.

(8)

-2.':/\S~~.._~OND tTfONS

The 1956 season" in general, vIas favorable for good corn pro ducr

i

on ,

The yield of the Harnett County test was reduced by hot dry wea

t

he r

during

pol

I

ination.

This caused poor

pollination

for

most

entries

J

but enough

rain

fell

in time for the corn to

make

a fair yield.

The Lincoln and

Alamance

County

tests

were

abandoned due to extreme

dry

weather and poor stands.

Under

these adverse

conditions

it

was the

opinion of the testing agency

that any

data obtained

would

be misleading

for evaluation of

hybrids.

PERFO~~NCE RECO~

Yield for the 1956

corn test

a~e

given

for

thirteen

tests.

The

dry

weather and

poor

stands in Alamance and

Lincoln

Counties rendered

these

two

test~

useless.

A single

year's

record at

a

given location

may

not

portray

the

true

performance

of a hybrid or variety over a wide range of seasonal conditions.

In Area

IV,

Southern Coastal

Plain,

records of three tests have been averaged.

Likewise, in Area

V,

Northern Coastal

Pta in ,

two tests have

been

averaged.

The

yield

records of commercially a ve l lable hybrids that have been tested

in an area for three

consecutive

years

are summarized by area and should be utiiized when ava j

labl e.

Y(ELD.S

Bushels of corn harvested per e cre ;s the most important

considera-tion

in

choosing

a

hybrid

or

variety.

However ,

other characteristics

that contribute

to

yield and quality may be almost as important as yield

itself.

Such

characteristics as disease resistance, lodging

resistance,

height of ears" husk cover" grain

quality,

stored grain

insect

sU5cepti-bit

ity

should

always be kept ciearly-io

mind.

(9)

-GRP,IN QUA1.

f:ex

Gra in qua I ity is an indicator of market grade and takes into con-s ideration the percentage of kernelcon-s damaged

by

inseots and

decay

organ-isms and general appae rencs of the ears. Since the percentage of damaged kernels is one of the factors that determines market grade, all entries

are scored for decay or rot damage when these factors are present.

INS EeT DANAGE

V~eevi Is and other stored grain insects often cause damage to the

kernels

on-the

ears of corn

in

the

fields before it isharvested.

Some

hvbrldsie re damaged more than others depending on how well the ears are

covered

-wl

th shuck.. earl iness of

maturity

and hardiness or starchiness of the ke rric l s ,

The tests

v/ere

atl harvested relatively early, therefore the stored

grain insect damage \A/aS so small that differences could not be

distln-guished.

&,0JSTURE fN GRA

J1i

Moisture in the gra in is a nother factor that determines market

grade.

15~5%

mOlstur8

is the maximum permissabte in grade

No.2

corn, therefore,

samples from

all

entries of each test are tested for moisture and artjusted

in or co r that yield com.rs r lsons are made at the same mo!sture con te...'. 15A~'%. Moisture conte~t is sometimes used to indicate

earl

iness or ~aturity

de

te , Usually

the

earl ier the

maturity

of

the corn the lower

the

moisture content. A hl qh pe

rcenre

qe of moisture maya Iso indicate a larger number of

the ears have fa lien to the ground and have absorbed moisture" EARS PER 100 S_TALKS

The number of ears per 100 stalks is a measure of prof

ificacy

and indicates whether an

entry

tends to be a single ear

0r

a prol ific

type.

EAR HEIGHT

-""--~--The height of ears from the ground may influence ease or difficulty of mechen

lee

I harvesting as well as hand picking. The percentage of plants

lodged may be increased by high ear. placement.

(10)

-1.008tN,(;'

Lodging is a term used to describe s fo l ks that are broken, leaning

or fa' len to the

groundt

All plants broken be I ow the ear or leaning more than

45°5

from the

perpendicular

are

considered lodged •

.§J:iORT SEASON Vs. FULL SEASON CORNS

Short season

corns

are

early

maturing and are

usually

sufficiently

dry to be harvested and marketed in le re Aucus r and September. These supply an early (Aug. and Sep

r

s ) market demand and the production of

this

type

of corn has been

limited

primari Iy

to

the

Northeastern Counties,

however , some ;s be ;ng gro\vn in other Cca staI ?Ia in Areas. These short season corns are grown for two specific purposes , (I) earl

y

market and

(2) hogging off.

The keeping quat itI8s of these short season

hybrids

are

usually inferior, and unless the grower exercises extra precautions the

quality and feed value is I ikefy to deteriorate rapidly from insect damage.

Short season corns are usually less suitable for storing on the farm because of this rapid deter:oration.

For general farm storing and feeding full season corns are more like I y to prese rye the; r qua I

i

ty and usua I I

yare

damaged I ess by

insects.

Fu I

I

season corns requ! re from three weeks to one month longer to reach maturity and to become sufficiently

dry

to

harvest

and store but in most of the state are usually

dry

enough to be harvested in early October.

Corns considered ful I season

In

the Coastal Pia in

may

not

mature

in Area I, Northern Mountains, therefore" only hybrids adapted for the higher

(11)

PERFQPJAANCE OF COF~N

-

-[i«ft1f~~~N /:'t~~~,li~

...

,J:rE&.~_

YEAR, A

VSB.6..~

1953-1955-1956

Yield 1\'0

t

sture

Lodged

Bus/A

%

%

Qua

fj

ty

Slltries

3

Jests

:5

...,.!T(;;tsts111m

---

2 Test~ 3 Test~

Funk G.:.95A 107.0 26r»5

4.0

2

Funk G..91 98\l9

24.7

, ;0

2

DeKaIb 837

96.5

25.3

1.0

2

U.S. 2(32

95.7

30.3

9.5

2

Wood

V-30

94.0

27.6

2.5

,

N.C.

24

91.7

24.7

6;,5 2

U.S.

13 91.0

26.3

5.5

3

VJest

Virginia

, 163

88.9

22.4

1.0

2

MJI fer Spe ciaI 75.1

25.2

9.0

2

Mean of Standards ,

85.7

24.7

5.5

Standards are:

U.S.

13,

WeVa

Q I f63,

N.C. 24,

Mi tier Special.

PERFCR~AANeE OF COR!'J

...

~

-SOUTHERNl A~OUNTA fNS TJ-REE YEAR AVERAGE

1954-1955-1956

Yield

Bus/A Motstutie Lodged

~ntri~~ :3 Te..

ili

%

_..JL

~lli

DeKa

I

b 1024

84.3

23.6

1,;)0 2

Lance

82.

f

23:)0 15.0 I

Dixie

17

80.9

24.4

12.5

2

Dixfe29

80.4

26:4

1.5

2

Funk G-95A 79c6

21.7

5~O

2

U.S. 282

79.3

24.3

60 0 2

*N.C. 27

78.6

28.

I

6.0

J

Funk G.:.134

77.8

22.2

3.5

2

Wood V-26Y

77.2

22.1

Z~5 2

DeKa

I

b 1050 760 6

26.2

7.0

Vloods V-30

72.8

22~5

2.5

2"'

Holcombe

66.8

23,0

10.0

2

U.S.

13

65.0

24.4

3.0

2

Mean of

S

ta nda rds 74. I

23.8

5.3

S

ta

ndards a re : r954 .. 1955-N.C'.

36"

U.S~

13,

u.s.

282,

DixIe

17~

&

Ho I combe ,

1056-Dixie 29,

U.S.

13, U.S. 282, D

i

xi

e

17

J

&

Holcombe.

*These

data are

based on J954 and 1955

performance

and

haVG

been computed

to be

re Ia tive to

other

entries here

shown.

(12)

--PERFORN~f\l.~E OF CORN ENTR

I

ES

P JEDtAONT - THREE YEAR AVERAGE

...

- . . - . - . . . .

Yield %

Bus/A

lodged

Quality

Entries 5 Tests .5 Tests

.2..Ies

ts

-Dixie 82

85.4

23.0

2

Coker 9'

I

85.0

25.0

2

N.C~

42

84.0

30.0

2

Dixie

17

83.7

43.0

2

Funk 77(}N

80.2

18.0

2

V.P.

r.

gOaW

78.3

25.0

3

U.S.

523VJ 77(.9 30.10

2

Dixie

29

75.2

14.0

2

Pf

ister(

PAG)486

74.1

19.0

2

Funk 710A

73.7

16.0

2

*NC 27' 73~7 23.0

2

Vvood S.:.210

73.2

28,0

2

Woed V-5IA

72.9

33.0 2

DeKarb 1024

72.0

49.0 2

DeKa I b 1050

69

0 4

7.0

2

Wood

v:

J25VJ

67

0 6 22.0

3

N,C.

31

67.5

260 0

2

-...N·.-G-. 1032'

66.6

16.0 2

Funk G-704

66

G 2 11.0 3

McCurdy

IOOrA

64.7

14.0

I

V.P.I. 645 63.9

9

0 0

3

We.ek ley

56.4

40<10 Z'

Mea n of S ta nda rds

74.9

24

Q 3

Standards are: 1954

N.C.

27, N

eC8

31; N.C.

I032~

Dixie 17,

&

Weekley_

1955

N.C, 27,-N.C3

31,

N~C.

1032, N.C. 42

t

&

Dixie

17.

1956 Dixie 29, N.C. 1032,

N.C. 42,

&

Dixie

82

Q

*

These data are besed on the 1954 and 1955 perforrmance and have been computed

to be relative to other

entries here shown,

(13)

-.E1.8.FORNANCE

OF CORN Er··ITR.

__

...

-

I

ES

I

SOUTHEBN COASTAL PlA IN - THREE YEAR AVERAGES

.

-FULL SEASON TEST

.-.

...

~

Entries

Coker 91

I

Dixie 82 Dixie 29

D~Ka fb 1024

*NC 27

N.C. 42

DeKa

l

b 1002

Pfister

(PAG)486

Funk G-710 Dixie 18 Tenn 90 DeKalb 1050

McCurdy 1003

VJood S -2 I

I

Coker 811

McCurdy

JOO2A

N.C. 29

::=*Jar-vis x Indian Chief

La them Doub Ie

Mean of S tanda rds

Yfeid Lodged'

Bus/A % QuaI

rty

7 Test.§.:

---

7 Tes ts 7 T~~~

65.0

3~O I

6041 7,,0 2

60~O

6.0

2

59.8

26.0

3

59.8

9,,0 2

59,5 1(.0 2

57n9 21

.o

3

56e 6 10.3

2

55.6

If .0

2

55.4

6&0 2

54.4

12~O 3

5~.2 t1.0 3

53,,9

8.0

I

53 Q 3

8.0

2

52 .. 5 3,,0 2

52.3

5~O

52. I 12~O i"')L.

4' .3 15~O 2

38.5

16.0 2

56.6

9~O

Standards are: 1954 Dixie 18, Dixie 82, N.C. 29, N.C. 27 & Latham Double

1955

N~C.

27, N.C. 42, N.C. 29;

Dixie

18,

&

Dixie 82

1956 Dixia 29, NC 42, Dixie 18, & Dixie 82

*These data are based on 1954 and 1955 performance and have been computed

to be relative to other entries here

shown.

··:Experimenta

I

(14)

EERFORMANCE.. CJF CORN EJ'~TRI ES

NORTHER~ COAS.TA L PLAIN - THESE YEARwBY~RA'f7E FULL SEASON TEST

1954-1955-19.56

Yield Lodged

gnt ri e

s

8u~/A

%

Qua

I it~

Dixie 82

93.5

29.,0

I

Dixie 29 88.7 214tO 2

N,C.

42

860 9 3 J.O

I

Coker 91 I 86e9 29,0 I

*N

.e.

27

85.9

30.,3 I

Pioneer 309-A Sf .6 Iq.O

2

DeKa I b 1050

81.6

21.0

2

N.C. 29

80,,7

24

eO

2

Coker 81J 80.4 2

roo

r

McCurdy JOOO~

79.6

35.0 J

Pioneer 312-A

78.7

28.0

2

Pioneer 510

78.1 28.0 2

Pf

is

te-r t

PAG) 486

77.8

32f>O 2

Wood'

5-210

75

9 7

37.0

I

LathW:' Doubl e 67~3 340 0

2

Mea n

of

5

tanda

rds

83.2

25.9

standards

ares

1954 N.C. 27, N.C.

29,

& Latham's D\..···~le

1955

N.C. 27 N.C.

29,

&

N.C. 42

1956

Dixi~

29, N.C. 42

~-These de te are based on 1954 and' 1955·pe~formance and have been computed

to be relative

to other

entries

here-shown •

(15)

-PfRFORNANCE

- OF CORNI ENTRIES_

NOF\THERN COAST/~1 PLAfN_=-JJ:!EEE YEAR AVERAGE

SHORT SEASON TEST

125~1955-1956

Yield

Per cent

futr]l!.S.

--...-Bu~/A Lodge d ~_ill

U. S. 578 970 8 33.0 2

Woods V-5IA ~7.8

27.0

2

u.

S.

523'1J

95.6

32.0

2

Woods V-125W

93.4

26.0

2

McCurdy 988 92~6 20.0 3

Funks G-5 r2.V~

90. I

3100 2

u,

S. 282

86.2

41.0 J

Pioneer

30lA 85.3

22.0

3

McCurdy~9lON

84.6

30.0

2

Funks G-704

83.8

24.0

3

Funks G-134 83e I

26.0

2

Deka

lOb

837 80.9 15.0 3

N. C~

46

80.3

20.0

2

Pf ister (PAG) 403

79.2

24

eO

2

Woods V-26Y

76.4

18\10 3

Pioneer 342A

72e9 29~O 3

Ohio C-54

71.1

9.0

2

Mean of S ta nda rds

86.4

33.5

standards are: . 1954-NC 36, U.S. 282,

&

Ky

203

1955-1956 N.C. 46, U.S. 282,

&

U.S. 523W

(16)

-S'J,'~Vv\ARY OF .Elli.E0R/·~\A. ~g

1256 -

NCRTHERN r,'\9UNT~ INS

%

Yellow Yield ~Aois ture

Ea r

Hr ,

Ears/IOO

Exposed

Entries

Bus/6.

%

f':'Inches

Sta' ks_

Ear Ti

r;~ Q,ua~

Funk G-95A

107.2

30.6

46

107

73

2

VleP.I. '648 10

1.8

31.4

47

93

35

J

Funk G-91

99.2

28.0

51

roo

64

3

Pf

ister

(PAG) 401

95.9

29.8

49

100

68

3

Deka 1b 837

95.2

31.4

48

108

27

3

V"e

Va.

1163

94.7

26.6

38

107

60

2

*'~JeC. 1047

94.3

27.7

54

104

48

I

~·J..

C. 24

93.7

28.3

46

93

46

2

Pioneer 30lA

93.4

30.3

47

118

52

3

VJcod V. 30

92.7

31.9

44

100 55 I

N.C. 46

89.4

29.9

44

104 II I

U.S. 282

88.8

32.9

55

100

3'

I

Dekalb 609

880 t

25.9

39

100

45

3

De!<alb 850 87~6

29.9

52

1 I r 27

2

Mea n of

S

ta nda rds

87.4

Pf

is ter

(PAG)

403

85.0

30.2

42

100

64

3

*

N.C. 3068

84

CJ7

30.2

47

104 14

2

\~ood V-26Y

84.2

310 4

42

r'6

32

I

UoS.

13

83.6

30.2

52

IC5 43 4

Pioneer 309A

8200

35.5

56

1'1

13 2

DekaJb 62eA

82.0

29.6

47

116

68

2

Vlhite

Entries

---Pfister (PAG) 633W

94.9

31 Cl4

49

roo

4 2

*

Tenn. 3742 930 4

3009

48

104 10

I

Mean of S ta ndards

87.4

V•

p.

I.

730V

I

85.

f

31.9

50

93 19

2

Mil I

e

r

S

pecia

I

77.7

28.3

49

104 19 2

DekaJb 707

72.2

29.2

47

86

28

I

L.S.D.

.05

21.8

S tanda rds

are

U.S.

13J ~V. VA. 1163,) N.C. 24,

;.\i

II

er

Spec ia I.

*

Adv~nced Experi menta Is

(17)

-SU/vVv~RY OF PERFORjlJ'ANcg

SOUTHERN MOUNTAINS

-

-1222

Ye I l ow

%

Yield Moisture Car Ht.

Ear/IOO

Exposed

Entries

Bus/6.

ld ..

!t&'h~!.._

s

ta I ks Ea r Ti os

Q.1&Lu

U.S. 282

95.0

290 5

55

117 II 2

Dekalb 893

93.1

27.4

61 102 8 2

V. P.

I ..

646

92.0

30.9

49

104

24

I

Pf

is ter

(PAG) 444 89~6

28.3

48 91 31 I

P f

is te r

(PAG) 401

89.3

24.9

52

124 ~I

I

Pioneer 309A

88.2

3 r"9

57

104 14

I

Dekalb In24 86~8

24.9

57 123 12 I

::~P

i

oneer x

2990 38.9

25.2

47 108 32 2

Funk G-134

82ol4

26.9

45

88

17

I

,Pfister <PAG) 403 82Cl3

28.9

44

113 41 2

V. P. I. 648 81.9

2902

46

98

36 2

Funk's'G 706

81.0

27.2

50 96 12

2

Funk G-95A

80.2

25.9

49 102 16 J

Deka I b 896 80.0

25.9

58 110

17

2

Dekalb 1050

79.5

31.9

66

96 19 2

N.C.

46

78.8

28.3

51 107

2

2

*N.C. 4057'

7SG I 24.9 47

98

17 I

Wood V-26-Y

77.7

27.2

43 100 31 I

*N.C. 1047

77.2

26.3

44

79

19 2

Mean of

St~ndards

76.5

Wood V-30 76.1

26.9

43 96 45 J

Dekalb 898

74.6

27.7

48

92 30 2

Pioneer 30lA

73 .. 6

28.3

42

103 33 2

Wood's V-44

73.3

28.6

43 95

23

I

V• P.

I.

426

63.3

24.9

34 100 18 I

U.S. 13

54.5

26.2

52 122 31 2

White Entrie,S"

U.S. 523-V!

91.2

25.9

59 109 12 2

DIxie

17

85.6

30.2

63 146

5

I

Lance

84.6

25.8

58 156 12

2

V.P. I.

730Vl

84.0

26.2

48

96 15

2

Pfister (PAG)

636W

79.3

29.2

51 110 15

2

Pf

ister

(PAG) 633W.

79.0

30.3

49

145 12 1

Dixie 29

77.9

27.7

55 135 3 2

*Tenn. 3742

77.5

27.5

46

121 21 1

,Mean of S tanda rds

76.5

Hot·combe

69.3

24.9

34

100 18

~J'as~n

67.5

29.7

63

11O 16

L.S.D.

.05

18.7

Standards are U,S. 282,

U.S.

13,

Dixie

29, Dixie

17

and

Holcombe.

~dvanced

Experlmentals

(18)

-1956 - STANLY COUNrf

- -

..

_

.. .

-%

Yel 10" Yield Mo; sture

lodged

Ea

r Ht.

Ea

rS/1

00 Exposed

Entries

8_us/A

%

%

Inche~ S

ta

'ls2.._

Ear Til?§.

Quality

Dixie 82 140.7

27.2

26 65 118 0

N.C.

42

131.8

24.9

28

58 107 0

*Coker 5005 123.8

26.9

4

60

126 3

Mean of S ta nda r ds 117.6

24.3

Deka I b 1023 I I f.8 .

22.2

48

54 100 18 2

*N. C. 4'062 114,3

27.4

10

53

96 3 I

*Coker 5008 I 14.2

25.3

10 59 125 0 I

Pfister (PAG)

488

112. I 23. I 41 50 93 4 2

~~peight 0-4 1I1.8

27.7

7 50 100 0 I

Pf ls te r

(PAG) 486 II 1.5

29C'9

17

52

f07 0 (

Dekafb 1022 IIOs3

22.5

40

56 96 59 2

Wood $-210 109\02

26.6

16

54

92 8

,

pioneer 309A 108.4

25.8

8

47

104 7 2

*N.C.

1004 107.7

23.4

24

58

96

3

I

Wood V-5 tA 107.1

223.5

26

45

86

25

Funk G-710A

106.5

2404

16 55 100 4

Dekalb 1024

102.4

22.8

51 56 104 10

Deka I b 1050 10 1.7

23.4

3 60 93 12

U.S.

282

97.5

22.4

37 48 100 II

Pioneer 302 97.2

22.2

15 42

96

19 I

McCurdy IOOIA

96.2

24.5

'0

60

104 3 t

Pioneer 30lA

95.7

20.2

17

40

96

30 3

N. C. 1032

93.2

200 7 13 56 108 4 J

Pioneer

318 92.4 18.1

10

45 II J 32 2

Wood V~44 89~2

22.0

0 42 82

22

J

Funk G-704

87.2

26

0 6 10

44

86

17 2

V.P.I.645

86.9

25.5

4

44

86 25

2

Pi oneer 3)2A

85.5

21.0 21

41

93 8 3

V.P.

1.646 84.5 21.7 5 50

93

27 2

N.C. 46 84.5 21.7 , t 42

96

4 I

Funk G-rJ·06 82.8

22.2

26 44 93 19

:2

V.Pet.426 75.1 21.4 ,,~

32

86

17

3

(19)

-(Continued)

~~L9£J~~CB!\!~..-:.. Plf~;~CliI AREA

Jill

J._£1f~~l~!Jb.ll°1J1in.:

White

%

Yield Mo isture Lodqe d Ear Hf. 1;ars/IOO Exposed

~tr!eA Bys/!\ C'1 %

.l.nche

S ~taJ ~_ ~...ll~

Q!!W1}!.

/0

DixIe

17

139.8

24.6

69

59 129 4 2

Dixie

!::l5 138.3

25.2

32 63 119 0

I

Coker 91

I

135.5

27.7

44

53 114 3 I

Pf ister- ( PAG) 653w 131.8

25.3

43

55 144 0 2

Funk G-779w 123.5

26.6

10

51

100 21 2

Wood

5--352

121.4

24.0

37 57 107 10

U.S~

523w

120.8 2 J.4

15

51 100 fI

Mean of Sta nda rds 117.6 24.3

V.

Pel. 900w

I 17.3 24~5

17

57

100 (4 2

Pfister <PAG) 633w ~O5.5

23.9

17 48 100 II 3

Dixie 29 104.7 24~5

14

55

107 3 I

Deka I b , CO2 IOO~6

22.7

27

61

104 0 I

Wood V-125v/ 99,~3

22.3

12

50

93 8 I

i

N.C.

31

97.8

25.7

28 59 100

4:4

Weekley

90.0

2'3.3 26 55 93

)0

Cocke

Pro

Iifie 82413

23.6

19

64

107 3

Standards are: N.C~ 42, N.C. I032!l 0 ixie 82" Dixie 29 & Nee. 27..

*

*Experimental Entries

**

The

entry

which was

intended to

be

N.C.

27

rroved to

be

at harvest time some

unknown stra in as evidenced from ear size shape,and color

v

Therefore the

data

have

not

been used as a standard

or

prese'nted

in

the tables.

(20)

-SU,:N~i\RY OF PERFOr~MNCE - SO~HERN C(;ASTA L PLA IN

BLADENj VI./AYNE AND HARNETT rOUNT I ES

1956 - FULL SEASON TEST

o:

Ears/IOO

loJ

Yellow Yield

Moisture

Lodged Ear Ht. Exposed

Entrie~ Bu/A

..

% %

I

nche~ Stal~

Ear Ti ps

'-;uol i t~

Dlx ie 82

96.2

20.8

9,,0

58

122 I 2

*Coker 5004 92.2

21.8

3.0

58 153 0 2

~:Flor ida 5002A

88.2

'21 .2

10.0

60 99

5

I

Mea n of S tandards 86.9

9.5

I~. C.

42

86.6

19.3

9.0

58

104 2 2

Dixie 18 86~0

21.2

12.0 62

117

0 2

:~N. C. 4062 85.9

20

0 4

4.0

48 108 I 2

McCurdy 1003

84.5

20.,5 11.0

58

119 0 i

Pfister (PAG)

488

82~4 200 6

8.0

54

rII 7 2

*Coker ·5020 80.4 19~9

5.0

49

101 13 2

Funk G-710

78.8 19.r

14.0

50 103 16 2

*Spe

i

ght

D-4 78~6 1ge4 5 .. 0

49

131

7

2

Tennes!le~ 90

78.6

i9.2

8.0

49 102 7 3

Keys

tone

256 78.

I

19G5

17.0

57 104 7 2

Pf ister

(PAG)

486

78.1

20.7

10.0 52 127 7 2

Deksib 1002 76.3 18~6 5.0 53 130 7 3

Wood S~211 76,,0 19.9

8.0

51

114

3

2

Funk G-730

77.2

190 8 12.0 53

99

4 2

Deka

ie

1024 77a

I

18~6 140 0

49

71

20

3

funk G-710B

76.7

19.5

14.0 49 116 1

r

2

Pioneer r097

75.3

19.5

10.0

51 105

'9

3

McCurdy JOO2A

75.2

18.6

5.0

53 130 7

Deka I b 105f

75.0

18.8

9.0

52

95 II 3·

Deka I b 1050

73.6

180 8

12.0

54

105 14 3

~arviSXlndian

Chief

70~4 19,,,0

15.0

52

92

18 3

Latham Ye II ow 66.1 10.3 18.0 53

98

a

3

High

56.3

::?0.3 14.0 56 82 5 3

(21)

-<Continued)

SUN./v'ARY CF PE~FORNANCE - SCUTI;E:-=<~: CQ6...STAL P.1A1N

~LADENI

VJAYN..E

.AND H~RNErr COUNT I ES

1~56

-

FULL

~~SON

TEST

\Vhi

te

~rl~

Yiefd h\oistur~

!3

u/A

%

tLodged Ea r Ht. % . ~tnches"..,

Ears/IOO

S

ta

I ks

%

Exposed

Ear Ti os

yua

I jt~

*NC 2155 Coker 91 J

Pf

is ter

(PAG) 653W'

Coker 811

Mean of §ta nda rds

950 5

93C15

90.3

87~8

86.9

20.6

19.2

r9.3

22.2

50

48

53

51

118 128 129 138 10 7

..,

I 2 2 2 2

N.C.

29

86.4

20e5

24.0

60

108 4 2

Dixie 55

Dixie 29

Deka I b I 10I

La them Daub Ie

84.

J

78(17

750

I

63.2

19.5

20,,7

17.6

23.1 17.0

8.0

30.0 18eO

55

52

48

57 t 15 123

98

104 1 9 29 3 3 3 3 3

standards are: N. C. 42" N.C. 27::~*, Dixie 82" Dixie 18 and Dixie 29

*Experimental

Entries.

**

The

entry

which was intended to be N.C. 27, proved to be

at

harvest time some

unknovn stra in as evidence from ear size, shape, and color. Therefore the data have not been us ed as a stendard or presented in the tables.

(22)

-§.U/v'NARY OF FERf0RNANCE - SOUTHEBN...fOl\STAL

J PtA IN - AREA IV

BLADE N. "'fA YNE A NO w\((NETT COUNT I ES

195~.SHORT SEASON TEST

%

Yel Jow Yield

N,o

isture

lodged

Ear Ht. Ea rs/iOO Exposed

Entr-l~~_ F Bus/A

%

.

% Inches

s

ta.l

ks Ear

r:

c~

Q.ua

I jtv

McCurdy 988

79.4

21.1 2·'

47

89

29 2

Pioneer 309A 78.6

22.7

I

49

103 5 I

Wood

V-5IA

75.8

22.3

12 50 85 30 I

U.S. 282

73.3

23.2

5

52

105

35

I

V. P. I • 646

72.0

20.7

2 50 95 65 2

Mean of Standards· 70. I 3

I

Pf

is ter

(PAG)

444

67.3

21.J

I

44

90 63 2

*NC

5004

67.

J 21.3

5

44

88

71

3

Pfister (PAG)

403

66.6

20.6

2

41

92 37 3

Deka

I

b 801 66192

22.4

3

44

84 15 2

V,

P.

I •

426

65.4

20.9

J

35

89

27 2

DekaI b

873

65.1

21.2

3

47

89 31 3

Wood

V-26Y

62.4

23.7

I 42

81

23 2

N.C.

46

62.1

22.0

I

44

85 5 2

Ohio

C-54

59.

I

19.5

2

39 95

44

2

~ .

Whl

te

Entries

*Tennessee 3742

87.1

20.7

3

47

119 9 I

*NC

5103

76.7

22.6

4 43 87

16

I

U.S.

523w

75.0

21.6 3 49

96

14

I

Pfister (PA~) 633

74.7

22.5

3

46

96 14

I

Oekalb

925

73.3

2' .6

5

46

94 12 I

Mean of Sta ride

rcs

70.1

3

'flood V-125w

68.3

21.8

5

49 90 15 2

Standards are: N. C. 46, U. S. 282 and U. S. 523w

*

Experimenta I Entr

iese

(23)

-sUI\~rARY O~ PERFORNANCE ., NORTHERN COASTAL PLAJN AREA ~i.

MARTrN ArM) CA/ADEN COUNT 1ES

1956 - FULL SEASON~.E.ll

%

Yel

low

Yield

Moisture

Ear Ht.

Ears/IOO Exposed

Q'Jality

Entries

8us/~ %

lr

ches S

ta

Iks Ea r T; r.s

---Dixie

82 119.4

24.6

65 127 2

NC 42 t 13.9

23.4

63

104

2

.~unk G-710A\ 112.3 21.7 57 I II

10

• NsC.

4062 I I' .8

24.3

56

108 4

Mean

of

S

ta nda rds

I JO.7

Pioneer 309A 109.5

22.0

48

97 9 2

*FIorida 5002A 109.0

26.3

63 123 3

I

Dixie

18

105.3

25.5

72

130 2 I

Pl

onoar

312A

104.9

20.4

45 100 15 2

Deka 1b 1023 103.9 21.3

58

97 20 2

McCurdy (OOOA

101.0

20.8

58

102 6

1

*Coker 5008

IOC

06

23.8

59 110 0

1

*Coker 5005

99.9

26.4

59 JII 2 I

"Ala rvl

5

x

Ind ian Chief

99.7

22.4

60 J

17

8 1

Deka Ib 1002

99.4

19.6

51

90 30 3

Pfister(PAG) 488

98.9

25.4

53

97 6

I

Pioneer x 1097 98.8

24.2

54

95

4 I

Pfister (PAG)

486

97.2

22.6

58 I II 10 I

Dekafb 1050 94.8 21.0 59 96 12

2

Pioneer 302A

94.2

20.3

48

104 9 4

Deka

I

b

8.52

93.4

20.0

45

98

14

3

..

VJood

S-210

89~9

23.3

56

94

5

I

*pj

oneer

X2468 88.8 17.5

45

102 34

4

(24)

-<C0ntinued)

~ldid!ARY OF PERFOR/AANeE - .NORTHEEN COAS~TALPL~ II~ AREA V

MART

IN AND C~D.E!t~ COUNTIES ~6

-

FWL~~~SON

TEST

%

Whi

te

Yield MoIsture

Ear Ht.

Ears/IOO Exposed

Entr7es

8usL~

% Inches

§.!ll.kL-

~Tjps

Qua

Ii

tv

---

-

...

*NC ~155 J18.5

21

~7

58

126 3 J

Coker 911 118.3

23.6

57

116

6

1

Pfister (PAG)653w 114.7 2 f.5

55

I I J

2

2

Mean of Standards r1O.7

Dixie

55

109.3

23.1

55

92

0

Coker

811 108.1

27.9

62 144 0

N. C.

29

107.6

26.0

57

117 0

2

Dixie

29

107.4

22.6

61 119

2

2

Pioneer 510

106.8 20.0

53

100 30 2

Funk G-779w

104.5

23.8

54 100

17

2

Deka Ib 1103 I03~5 20.8

53

96

23

2

Pioneer·

.503 £}9.7 20.6

54

98

15

2

La tham Doub Ie 89.9

28.3

68

120 2

2

Standards are: N. C.

42,

N.

c.

27*~

end Dixie

29

*

Ex perimenta I Entries

**

The

entry

which was

intended to be N. C. 27 proved-to be at harvest time

some unknown stra in as

evidenced from ear size, shape, and color.

Therefore

the

data have not been

used as a standard or presented in

the

ta b Ie

s.

(25)

-SUl;V..\A,k'f OF PERFORNAN~E .. ~.Q8.THEt~N CCASTA.U~6.1~

t:ART I N AID C/\/v'DEN COUNT JES

-

,

.

...._ - . - . - . . - - - - .

J.9

5

6

,wP.

itl9BI.

~ft:SON

TEST

%

Yel low Yield

Mois-tu,.-o"

Ear Ht.

Ears/IOO Exposed

En.tri~ Bus/A•. %

J

nche.s ~J21ks

-

-S.a,r,.

Ti.£~ Q~.LLtx

Ur;58

578

1190 4

25.7

49

JOO 32 2

Wood V-5JA

I' 8.2

26.4

55

100 43

2

McCurdy 988

J10,,6

25.3

50 104 34 2

U.S.

282 109.8 260 6

46

97

26

1

Mean of S

ta

ndards

109.1

V.P.I.

648 107.4

23.6

44

99

61

3

Pioneer 30lA

105.7

22.7

42

95 43 3

Deka

Ib

I 876 I03e3

23.5

48

98

38

2

Funk G-134

102.5

22.9

42

97

14

2

Pfi

ster

(PAG) 444

10202

24.9

46

102 72 3

Deka

I b

837

99.3

23.4 39 98

25

2

N.C.

46

98~6

27.8

46

100

8

I

Pf

ister

(PAG) 403 98.1

22.0

42

104 37 3

Funk G-704

96.5

25.7

43

98

15 2

Pioneer

34.5 96.1 2J.5

38

95

48

3

Pioneer 305

93.4

22.4

40

98

13 3

*NC

50

re

92.5

24.9 38 102 12 2

Wood" V-26Y

92.0

24.8

44

97

'8

3

Pi oneer' 342A·

89.9

fa.8 39 102 36

2

V0

P.', .

426

84.5

23.6

33

102 30 3

Ohio

C-54

84.3

21.0

38

95

46

3

(26)

-(Con

t

i.nued)

~Uf'.~F·~r CF PERFCRf,~NCE _-

NORTf

IERi·~•.CO~STALP.LAlli HARTIN AN) CAN08HJ CO~~TIES

1956 - SHORT SEASON

TESl

%

V/h

i

te

Yield Mo isture Ear Ht0

Ea

rs/IIOO Exposed

Entries Bus/A % Inches ?ta I ks Ear Tios Qua

Ii

ty

U.SG

523w

I 19~O

26.6

50

98

I I

2

V

tt

P• I.

730VtJ 118.7

23.4

48

97

44

2

Pfister(PAG)633w

115,7

25.9

46

106 18

2

Funk

G..

512\f1 111,,7

25.4

52

100

8

2

Mean of Standards 109.1

*Tennessee 3742

108.1

26.5

45 100

20

2

~Vood V-125w 104.,8

26.4

50

109

21

2

*NC

5108 103.8

27.9

43

100 5 I

Deka I b 923

102.0

24.1

46

97

17

2

Mccurdy

glOw

94.9

26.5

45

98

34

2

Keystone i07w

93

0 6

26.2

44

88

27

2

Mean of Standards

'09~

1

Standards are:

U.S. 282, U.S. 523w, N.C. 46

*E.xper imenta I

Entries.

References

Related documents

spanning tree from RAPD data. RAPD profiles of some Portuguese L. RAPD band patterns within L.. Phylogenetic trees of the L. donovani complex based on RAPD data. donovani

 Second phase: system analysis using DEMATEL method;  Third phase: selection of key environmental factors figure 1.. 3.1 First Phase:

Oriented psychotherapy (SBOP) 128 Rajah 3.11 Kandungan modul Spiritual Body Oriented psychotherapy (SBOP) 129 Rajah 3.12 Hasil Kajian Rintis Pertama Menggunakan Modul BOP dan SBOP

Specifically, we study the effect of the engineering college capacity for undergraduate engineering studies in different Indian states on the regional growth of the software

● Fields, bar and column charts showing the total number of students leaving and entering each school per grade in a given year (overview panel) and students migrating to and from

This paper explores the analysis regarding the installation and application of geothermal systems on college campuses, specifically at the University of Richmond.. Using the research

This extends the results by Greuel and Pfister [35] for fields based on the MGPS- algorithm and by Adams and Loustaunau [1] for rings with global orderings based on

HPC International Desks Director Leads One Day Workshop - Michel Davison, HPC International Desk Director, was the primary speaker at a one day NOAA sponsored numerical