• No results found

Blast Proof Occupied Buildings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Blast Proof Occupied Buildings"

Copied!
25
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Contents Presentation

References

Functional Specification Blast Resistant Building

Basis for design

Blast & impact loading

Design modeling & analyses

Preliminary design

(3)

Explosion Analyses & Blast Resistant Design ) Q Vstoichiometric gas ges/hr V Q

(4)

References Blast Resistant Onshore Modular Buildings

BASF Seal Sands Workshop Blast resistance check 0,9 Psi

Shell Pernis for Hertel CKT

Blast Resistant Modular Building 8 Psi

BP Refineries for Hertel

(5)
(6)

Functional Specification Blast Resistant Building Shell Pernis

Frame work structural steel; external walls

corrugated plating

Blast overpressure resistance: 970 mbar; 92,3

millisecond

Explosion driven 6 inch, 300 lbs blind flange

impact resistance

(7)
(8)

Basis for design specifications;codes & standards

Specifications: – GP 04-30

Guidance on practice for design and location of occupied permanent buildings subject to blast, fire and gas hazards on onshore facilities

– GP 04-20

Guidance on Practice for Civil Engineering

– DEP 34.17.10.30-Gen (optional)

Technical specification blast resilient and blast resistant control buildings/field auxiliary rooms

Codes and Standards – ARMY TM 5-1300

Structures to resist the effect of accidental explosions

(9)

Basis for design material properties

Material strength

Applied yield strength Fy = 355 N/mm² (St. 52 or equivalent)

Ultimate strength Fu = 510 N/mm²

Dynamic yield stress

Fdy = Fy x SIF x DIF

SIF = Strength increase factor

SIF = 1,1 for structural steel

SIF = 1,2 for cold formed steel cladding panels

DIF = Dynamic increase factor:

DIF = 1.29 for bending/ shear

DIF = 1.19 for tension/ compression

Applied material properties

Structural steel Fdy = 504/465 N/mm² (Bending-Shear/tension-compression) Sheeting Fdy = 550/507 N/mm²(Bending-Shear/tension-compression)

(10)

Basis for design criteria

Deformation limits

Ductility µ =Total (plastic) deformation/elastic deformation H = Frame height in mm 12 1.5 Plates 2 2

Open web joints

4 6

Metal sheet panels

δ < H/25 mm 3 3 Frame members 12 20 Beams/girths Ө º µ Deflection Rotation Ductility Element

(11)

Load combinations

Overall strength analysis blast resistant building – Dead weight + frame blast loading

• Longitudinal direction

• Transverse direction

Local strength analysis wall and roof panels

• Reflected over pressure

• Impact loading walls

Floor

– Dead weight + live load (3kN/m² • Stability

(12)

Design modeling & analyses

Computer programs & analyses

Local wall and roof analyses

The structural impact and response to the blast pressures to the external walls and roof are analysed by means of a time domain

non-linear physical excel software.

Overall frame design

The overall structural blast response calculation is performed with the software STAAD.PRO.

The peak dynamic reactions from the walls and roof are applied to the frame members.

(13)

Design model & analysis outside wall panels

(14)

Design model & analysis outside wall panels

Response corrugated sheet

-0.020 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 t [sec] x [ m ]

Non linear response In-elastic response Elastic response

(15)

Design model & analysis outside wall panels

Non linear spring corrugated sheet

-200000 -100000 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 -0.020 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 x [m] Fs [ N ]

Non linear spring

(16)

Design model & analysis outside wall panels

Reaction force corrugated sheet

-100000 -50000 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 t [sec] V [ N ] Reaction force

(17)
(18)

Design model and analysis roof panels Response 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.160 0.180 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.160 0.180 0.200 t [sec] x [ m ]

Non linear response In-elastic response Elastic response

(19)
(20)

Fragment impact analysis

Fragment impact resistance external walls

0 20 40 60 80 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Weight (kg) velocity (m/s) 6 inch #300 blind flange

(21)
(22)
(23)

Blast resistant frame model & analysis

Roof

(24)
(25)

Design details

•Doors •Windows •Ducts •Piping

HVAC 250 mm pipe mounted in corrugated wall

3658 b detail c 525 800 window 1800 500 2905 3100 1800 supporting width 1140

References

Related documents

(Clever PCs may note that he’s not as freaked out about the idea of demons existing as most people would be.) When he says this, you can roll his Acting 8- against the PCs’ PER

Bolt the floating pulley into the 190 lb cable crossover weight stack (NOT intended for the tricep pushdown weight stack- the one with the tricep back rest mounted to the frame as

Finally, in Study 5, participants completed one-time measures of normal narcissism and psychological health (i.e., depression, loneliness, subjective well-being,

In the case study, bandwidths used for the PSDM GWR model are always optimized via the AICc approach within every iteration step. Figure 5 shows all of the bandwidths used in the

Meanwhile this management and Environmental Protection policy is more focused on Responsibilities and Authority related to Recognition of Customary Law Communities specifically

He was named the 2001 consensus National Player of the Year, NABC National Defensive Player of the Year, first team All-America, Verizon Academic All-America, Final Four Most

It does not require direct human force as in normal methods because in this hydraulic pump and cylinder is used to enhance the force at the head of the coconut to put pressure

Linking all constraints (timelines, team management, work format) and the academic work required (literature search, synthesising information, scientific writing) with the peer-