• No results found

Cement Calculation Sheet

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cement Calculation Sheet"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 1

Sr. No. Parameters 1 1.0 35.5958 35.6076 Silica 0.5 30.9305 31.0319 Cao 0.5 35.5958 35.9068 Mgo 0.5 35.5958 35.6136 1.0 30.9305 30.9488 1.0 32.4032 32.4586

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sr. No. Parameters Formula

1 Ferric Oxide 0.5 2.3 (0.7985*V)/W 0.5 7.2 Chloride 2 1.4

Tested Checked

By:-MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 2

Test Start Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Initial Weight(W1) of Crucible (g) Final Weight(W2) of Crucible After Ignition (g) Loss on Ignition Insoluble Residue Sulphuric Anhydride Test Start

Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Titrant(V) (ml) Aluminium Oxide (V3*E)]; V1= Total EDTA (Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass of Sample;

(2)

Sr. No. Parameters 1 1.0 30.9305 30.9416 Silica 0.5 32.4066 32.5063 Cao 0.5 30.9305 31.2413 Mgo 0.5 30.9305 30.9522 1.0 32.4076 32.4262 1.0 30.9115 30.9675

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sr. No. Parameters Formula

1 Ferric Oxide 0.5 2.35 (0.7985*V)/W 0.5 7.28 Chloride 2 1.4

Tested Checked

By:-MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 3

Sr. No. Parameters 1 1.0 32.4076 35.6076 Test Start

Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Initial Weight(W1) of Crucible (g) Final Weight(W2) of Crucible After Ignition (g) Loss on Ignition Insoluble Residue Sulphuric Anhydride Test Start Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Titrant(V) (ml) Aluminium Oxide (V3*E)]; V1= Total EDTA (Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass of Sample; Test Start Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Initial Weight(W1) of Crucible (g) Final Weight(W2) of Crucible After Ignition (g) Loss on Ignition

(3)

1 Silica 0.5 30.9115 31.0129 Cao 0.5 32.4076 32.7182 Mgo 0.5 32.4076 32.4292 1.0 32.4032 32.4216 1.0 32.4032 32.4563

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sr. No. Parameters Formula

1 Ferric Oxide 0.5 2.35 (0.7985*V)/W 0.5 7.08 Chloride 2 1.4

Tested Checked

By:-MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 4

Sr. No. Parameters 1 1.0 30.9374 30.9041 Silica 0.5 32.3935 32.4922 R2o3 0.5 30.9358 30.9816 Cao 0.5 32.3969 32.698 Mgo 0.5 30.9399 30.9841 Insoluble Residue Sulphuric Anhydride Test Start Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Titrant(V) (ml) Aluminium Oxide (V3*E)]; V1= Total EDTA (Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass of Sample; Test Start

Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Initial Weight(W1) of Crucible (g) Final Weight(W2) of Crucible After Ignition (g) Loss on Ignition

(4)

1

1.0

32.3985 32.4035 1.0

33.4073 33.4811

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sr. No. Parameters Formula

1 Ferric Oxide 0.5 2.60 (0.7985*V)/W 0.5 Chloride 2 0.4 na k

Tested Checked By:-Insoluble

Residue

Sulphuric Anhydride

Test Start

Date Test End Date Weight(W) of Sample (g) Titrant(V) (ml) Aluminium Oxide (0.5098*V)/W [V=V1-V2 -(V3*E)]; V1= Total EDTA volume;V2= EDTA used for iron;V3= Volume of

bismuth nitrate;e= equivalence of 1 ml bismuth nitrate solution (0.08)

(Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass of Sample;

(5)

MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 1

Formula Calculation 1.18 Weight of Residue*200 20.29 Weight of Residue*200 62.20 Weight of Residue*72.4 1.29 1.83 Weight of Residue*34.3 1.90

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Formula Calculation Result

(0.7985*V)/W

3.67 7.34 0.06 Tested Checked

By:-MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 2

Result (%) Loss in Weight*100 Weight of residue*100/W eight of sample [V=V1-V2 -*E)]; V1= Total EDTA (Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass of Sample;

(6)

Z=[10-Formula Calculation 1.11 Weight of Residue*200 19.94 Weight of Residue*200 62.16 Weight of Residue*72.4 1.57 1.86 Weight of Residue*34.3 1.92

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Formula Calculation Result

(0.7985*V)/W

3.75 7.42 0.06 Tested Checked

By:-MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 3

Formula Calculation 1.11 Result (%) Loss in Weight*100 Weight of residue*100/W eight of sample [V=V1-V2 -*E)]; V1= Total EDTA (Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass of Sample; Z=[10-Result (%) Loss in Weight*100

(7)

Weight of Residue*200 19.94 Weight of Residue*200 62.12 Weight of Residue*72.4 1.56

1.84

Weight of Residue*34.3 1.82

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Formula Calculation Result

(0.7985*V)/W

3.75 7.22 0.06 Tested Checked

By:-MaRS Enviro Research & Engineering Services Private Limited

F/CEMCHEM/01,Issue No.1

GRAVEMETRIC METHOD (IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Sample ID :- 4

Formula Calculation 3.33 Weight of Residue*200 19.74 9.16 Weight of Residue*200 60.22 Weight of Residue*72.4 3.20 Weight of residue*100/W eight of sample [V=V1-V2 -*E)]; V1= Total EDTA (Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass of Sample; Z=[10-Result (%) Loss in Weight*100

(8)

0.50

Weight of Residue*34.3 2.53

TITRIMETRIC METHOD(IS :4032-1985, Reaffirmed 2009)

Formula Calculation Result

(0.7985*V)/W 4.15 5.01 0.017 0.22 0.46 Tested Checked

By:-Na2O result Weight of residue*100/W eight of sample (0.5098*V)/W [V=V1-V2 -*E)]; V1= Total EDTA volume;V2= EDTA used for iron;V3= Volume of

bismuth nitrate;e= equivalence of 1 ml bismuth nitrate solution (0.08)

subtractionof fe2o3 from r2o3 (Z*0.03546*0.025*100)/Mass

(9)
(10)
(11)

Z=[10-total sum wt difference 3.33 0.0333 100 19.74 0.0987 200 9.16 0.0458 200 60.22 0.3011 200 3.20 0.0442 72.4 multiplying factor

(12)

0.50 0.0050 100 2.53 0.0738 34.3 0.02 0.22 0.46 99.38 A/F RATIO 1.2072289157 LSF CaO - 0.7*so3 58.449 2.8*sio2+1.2al2o3+0.65fe2o3 63.9815 na meter reading* 100*100/10^6*wt. of sample result *10^6*wt of sample/10^4

(13)
(14)
(15)

Result 3.33 19.74 9.16 60.22 3.20

(16)

0.5 2.53

Result of lsf

References

Related documents

21.00 MTC-25SSG-BK C25-STAINLESS STEEL GRILLE-BLK Stainless Steel Replacement Grille for Control 25 Models, Black 21.00 MTC-25SSG-WH C25-STAINLESS STEEL GRILLE-WHITE Stainless

The need for a solution that is both able to process large amounts of data-in- motion with minimal impact on the network’s throughput and that still has a high detection rate was

In vitro studies reported that ellagic acid induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human cervical cancer CaSki cells, colon carcinoma, and bladder

With the help of modal circuits, where the DM-to-CM conversion is modeled by induced volt- age and current sources, it is proven that the CM generated by the presence of a bend can

Your contents which are away from your home, anywhere in Australia and New Zealand for up to 120 consecutive days, if the loss or damage occurs as a result of an event that we have

Therefore, qualitative research such as this aims to emphasise the intricacies of the males experiences and to phenomenologically explore the male experience of

This is important as if you add another prop for the effect there is a chance of extending the trick and developing it into something totally different (hopefully for the

Considering the advantages and limitations of the Heronian mean (HM) operator, four Heronian mean operators for bipolar neutrosophic number (BNN) are proposed: the BNN