• No results found

18th Century Counterpoint Sylllabus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "18th Century Counterpoint Sylllabus"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Eighteenth-Eighteenth-

Century Counterpoint, Music 406

Century Counterpoint, Music 406

& 506

& 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico

Office Center for the Arts room 2104, 505 277-2419, [email protected]

(2)

Information and Class Policies for

Information and Class Policies for

Music 406/506, 18th-Century Counterpoint

Music 406/506, 18th-Century Counterpoint

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, UNM

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, UNM

Office: Fine Arts Center

Office: Fine Arts Center, room 2104,

, room 2104, [email protected]

[email protected]

Attendance Policy:

Attendance Policy:

Regular attendance is required. An accumulation of 5 or more

Regular attendance is required. An accumulation of 5 or more

absences, excused or not excused, with a grade average of B or lower will result in a student

absences, excused or not excused, with a grade average of B or lower will result in a student

 being withdrawn from the course at my discretion. Otherwise, the grade will be lowered one

 being withdrawn from the course at my discretion. Otherwise, the grade will be lowered one

grade level (e.g. A to

grade level (e.g. A to A- , B+ to B, etc.) p

A- , B+ to B, etc.) per absence after the fifth. If you should

er absence after the fifth. If you should have to miss

have to miss

class, contact a class member and

class, contact a class member and get homework and “pre-homework” assignments from them.

get homework and “pre-homework” assignments from them.

As soon as p

As soon as possible—preferably beforehand—inform me of the

ossible—preferably beforehand—inform me of the reason for your a

reason for your absence. Y

bsence. You

ou

may use e-mail to inform me.

may use e-mail to inform me. This is area policy.

This is area policy.

Class Meetings:

Class Meetings:

Study of Pieces from the “Listening an

Study of Pieces from the “Listening and Study List...” Listen to the

d Study List...” Listen to the

 pieces, make your map, and prepare your questions for class discussion. Bring questions about

 pieces, make your map, and prepare your questions for class discussion. Bring questions about

the readings for the day. (See the “Reading Calendar”.)

the readings for the day. (See the “Reading Calendar”.)

Class Activities:

Class Activities:

(1)

(1)

Discussion of

Discussion

of Assigned

Assigned Readings

Readings from

from Class

Class Calendar

Calendar (all)

(all) and

and Graduate

Graduate

Student Reading Calendar (grad students only)

Student Reading Calendar (grad students only)

(2)

(2)

If t

If the di

he discu

scussi

ssions

ons of c

of clas

lass re

s readin

adings s

gs show

how inad

inadequ

equate i

ate insi

nsight o

ght or pre

r prepara

paratio

tion,

n,

unannounced reading quizzes may be given at the start of class.

unannounced reading quizzes may be given at the start of class.

Class Preparation:

Class Preparation:

(1)

(1)

Read

Read slo

slowly

wly and

and seve

several

ral tim

times w

es whil

hile d

e devel

evelopi

oping

ng que

questi

stions

ons for

for cla

class.

ss.

(2)

(2)

Dev

Develo

elop at l

p at leas

east tw

t two qu

o quest

estion

ions or

s or ins

insigh

ightful

tful obs

observa

ervatio

tions a

ns abou

bout th

t the rea

e reading

dingss

that baffle or intrigue you. You may be asked for them. These questions or observations

that baffle or intrigue you. You may be asked for them. These questions or observations

should be relevant, important, and creative, if at all possible.

should be relevant, important, and creative, if at all possible.

(3)

(3)

Wri

Write t

te thes

hese in

e in penc

pencil

il in y

in your

our text

textboo

book o

k or xe

r xerox

roxed a

ed artic

rticle s

le so th

o that y

at you w

ou will

ill

remember them in class when I ask you.

remember them in class when I ask you.

Course Objectives:

Course Objectives:

This course focuses on composition in the style of and analysis

This course focuses on composition in the style of and analysis

of chamber music of Europe and to a lesser degree America in the late 17th- through

of chamber music of Europe and to a lesser degree America in the late 17th- through

18th-centuries. Historic, aesthetic, educational, performance, compositional, and

18th-centuries. Historic, aesthetic, educational, performance, compositional, and

theoretical concepts and issues are naturally interconnected and find appropriate

theoretical concepts and issues are naturally interconnected and find appropriate

emphases within this course.

(3)

Information and Class Policies for

Music 406/506, 18th-Century Counterpoint

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, UNM

Office: Fine Arts Center, room 2104, [email protected]

Dates, Important:

Registration

ends

Fri.,

30

Aug.

Last day to change grading options

Fri., 30 Aug.

Last day to drop with 100% refund

Fri., 6 Sept.

Midterm

due

Tues.,

15

Oct.

Proposals due (grads)

Tues., 22 Oct.

Last day to withdraw without Dean’s approval

Fri., 8 Nov.

Last day to withdraw with Dean’s approval

Fri., 6 Dec.

“Final Exam”

Tues., 10 Dec. 10:30-12:30

(grad presentations, grad papers due, & Class performances as needed)

Email:

 be sure to check your unm email account before class for any last minute

thoughts, pdf handouts, or scores that you will need.

Email Attachment Labeling:

You may submit homework and papers via email

attachment. I get many anonymous file/attachment names such as “term paper” or

“homework.” This is not very helpful as you might imagine for my associating this with

 you and this particular class. Hence, please use the following attachment/file labeling

convention.

Sender’s Last Name—Class Name—Assignment Name

Here is an example: Hermann–18thCentCpt–Ch3#2HW. (Here this means the

second homework assignment for chapter 3.) Please submit as a pdf for homework; pdf 

or MS-Word for papers. Of course, a traditional hard copy paper is quite acceptable for

homework or papers.

Email Subject Line Labeling 

: I get a lot of email, and it can be difficult to locate

the one of yours I may be looking for if it is labelled without a lot of thought. Here is the

convention for email labeling for you to follow.

Sender’s Last Name–Class Name–Topic.

Here is an example: Hermann–18thCentCpt–Ch3#2HW.

Extra Help/Office Hours:

TBA but on Tues. & Thurs. at my office for your help. If it is

not possible for us to meet at that time, then please make an appointment with me for a mutually

agreeable time. Suggest times you can meet on three different work week days via email. I will

(4)

Information and Class Policies for

Music 406/506, 18th-Century Counterpoint

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, UNM

Office: Fine Arts Center, room 2104, [email protected]

select one and inform you by email. Some times I am a bit late; please wait.

Final Examination:

There is none for this course. The scheduled final examination time

will be used for presentations of graduate student e ssays.

Grading Policy:

Homework = 59% of the course grade for undergraduates and 32% for 

graduates. Class participation (preparation of study pieces & reading as evidenced by questions

asked and observations shared) = 25% (Thus, I

should 

 NOT have much time to talk); Midterm

take home = 16%; Graduates only have a presentation and essay on the same topic = 27%.

Homework Policy:

Most class meetings will have homework due. (There are 25 in

number.) If after study, you do not understand your errors or my markings, see me during the

next office hour or make an appointment with me. Corrected homework will have numbers

written at the locations of errors. See “Tonal Error Key Sheet” for a description of the error so

labeled. All homework assignments for the semester are found in “Homework Schedule”. As

textbooks use differing symbols for analysis, we will standardize on “Notational Conventions for 

Tonal Music.” For a review of dissonance, see “Comments on Dissonance Types.”

INCOMPLETE OR LATE HOMEWORK: I will correct them only if I have time. A substantially

complete paper is will be awarded a D. If the paper is not substantially complete, then a grade of 

F is assigned. If a homework is not turned in, it is assigned a grade of zero for averaging. A

substantially late (but complete homework) with good reason will be assigned a grade of C

otherwise a D or F if nearly complete or substantially incomplete respectively.

Homework ID:

UNM student privacy policy indicates that student papers with

their names on them should not be left in places where others can see them: e.g in a sack

on the instructor’s office door. So, please e-mail me three choices for a homework

password that you will put on your homework paper where your name would normally 

go. To ensure that there are no duplicates, I will view them all and tell you which you

should use on your homework paper. Only you, me, and my graders will know whose

(5)

Information and Class Policies for

Music 406/506, 18th-Century Counterpoint

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, UNM

Office: Fine Arts Center, room 2104, [email protected]

paper is whose in order to assure privacy.

Send me this e-mail before the first Thursday.

I will

get back to you Wednesday night. Start using the new homework password for the first 

assignment due on the first Thursday of classes.

Lectures and Reading Assignments:

See the “Reading Calendar”. I tend to lecture on

related information that is not in the required text. After all, what is the book for if I merely

lecture on its contents? I also use class meetings to show other applications of the material. You

are responsible for information and concepts from both the lectures and the text. I will certainly

answer questions you may have about what you read in the textbook. Where I note

disagreements between my opinion and that of the text, remember, I'm giving the grade. Should

you be unsure of a conflict between what I've said and what is in the text, gently bring it up in

class. I note students with good powers of observation in that regard and reward them. If there is

reading involved, for reasons mentioned above, it must be read prior to the class meeting. Should

you not do this, you will be unlikely to follow fully what is going on in class.

Mistakes:

I make mistakes too! Its ok to make them. They only become problems when

we don't examine them carefully and learn from them. If you think you're going to make a

mistake, make a good and big one so that we can all learn! Its ok to tactfully point out one of my

mistakes, if you think I might have made one. If you are having trouble learning from your 

mistakes, get help from me immediately!

Performance of Your Pieces:

Each class member will have one of three compositions

 performed in class (not rehearsed, not sight read, but performed in class). They are the Small

Binary piece, the Two Part Invention, or the Large Binary piece. You will be expected to perform

in your piece and in other class members’s pieces when asked. The quality of your performance

will be a factor in your class participation portion of your grade. I will have sign up times on my

office door. You are responsible for rehearsing your classmates. Should you need to change times

and wish to swap times with a classmate both of you must email me making the request for a

(6)

Information and Class Policies for

Music 406/506, 18th-Century Counterpoint

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, UNM

Office: Fine Arts Center, room 2104, [email protected]

swap. These will be performed first thing in class so get there a bit early to set up. Bring your 

own music stands.

Plagiarism:

Is directly (by not directly citing the source of a quote and location in

source or homework solution) or indirectly (paraphrasing without citation of source)

taking credit for someone else’s work (intellectual theft). Should this occur, the

assignment (given a 0 not an F) or entire course (given an F) will be given at my 

discretion. Further disciplinary action might be assigned by the undergraduate or

graduate committee or student government; this may include a suspension from classes

for a semester or more or even expulsion. If you have any question, specific or general,

about plagiarism, please consult with me for an opinion

beforehand 

.

Problems:

If after reading this syllabus, you have serious cultural, economic, familial,

health, linguistic or religious issues with the demands of this course or in the manner of its

administration, contact me immediately to see what we might be able do to accommodate you.

Questions:

I LOVE THEM! Remember, no matter how “dumb” your question may seem

to you, at least five other people in class are thinking the same thing. (They just don't have the

guts to ask.) Some of the “dumb” questions I've heard in class over the years have forced me to

rethink some basic issues in music. If you're confused, ASK THAT QUESTION! If you don't

understand the reading assignment—you have reread it, right?—ASK QUESTIONS! How else

are you going to get over the rough spots? See my comments on “Class Participation” above.

Recordings: You can get free access to classical music recordings as streaming mp3s by

following the links given here: http://elibrary.unm.edu/zimmerman/ — Databases—C—Classical

Music Library. You will be able to find one or more recordings of any piece used or mentioned in

this class. Some are also available for download purchase. The quality of performances on

YouTube range from ripoffs of commercial recordings to not-always-adequate student recital

performances. It really is important to hear experienced and vetted musicians play this music.

(7)

Information and Class Policies for

Music 406/506, 18th-Century Counterpoint

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, UNM

Office: Fine Arts Center, room 2104, [email protected]

Student input 

has greatly shaped this course over the years. So, please let me know 

how we can improve this for future students in the music department. Those who have

done well in this course have gone on to famous graduate programs and been successful.

 We want to keep a good thing going!

Tests & Quizzes:

There will be no tests in this class. I hope there will be no quizzes.

Text Books, none required but strongly suggeseted:

(1) Robert Gauldin,

 A Practical Approach to Eighteenth-Century Counterpoint. Revised ed.

ProspectHeights, Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc., 2013.

Scores Suggested:

(These are not in the bookstore.)

(1) Johann Sebastian Bach,

Keyboard Music

. New York: Dover, 1970.

(2) Johann Sebastian Bach,

The Well-Tempered Clavier: Books I and II, Complete.

 New

York: Dover, 1983.

(3)

178 Chorale Harmonization of J.S. Bach,

2 vols. (ed. Donald Martino). Only 

 www.dantalian.com<http://www.dantalian.com> sells these.

(4)

371 Harmonized Chorales and 69 Chorale Melodies with Figured Bass,

ed. Albert 

Riemenschneider.

Zzzz ...

Bring blank music paper, your texts,a pencil (NOT a pen), an eraser, and a smile

to class meetings.

(8)

Reading Calendar for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected]

3 Aug. 2013

 Week no.

Date Due

Reading

G or H

Pages

1

Tues.,

Aug.

20

Ch.

1,

Introduction

1-22

1

Thurs., 22 Aug.

Ch. 2, Melody

23-32

Polyphonic Line 

H

2

Tues., 27 Aug.

Ch. 3 Cpt Ped Foundations

33-40

2

Thurs., 29 Aug.

Ch. 4, 2 Voice: 1 to 1

41-56-3

Tues., 3 Sept.

Ch. 5, Simple diminution: 2 to 1

57-68

Counterpoint to Composition 

H

Mann,

The Great Composers 

G

7-39

3

Thurs., 5 Sept.

Todd,

Mendelssohn’s …

G

19-26

4

Tues., 10 Sept.

Ch. 6, 2 Voice Chorale Preludes

69-82

4

Thurs., 12 Sept.

Lester, Compositional Theory...

158-173

5

Tues., 17 Sept.

Ch. 7, Free Cpt Simple 2 Reprise

83-95

5

Thurs., 19 Sept.

Stefan Eckert, “So, you

G

 want to compose a Minuet?”

Music Theory Online,

vol. 11, no. 2

6

Tues., 24 Sept.

Ch. 8, Further Dim. 2 Voice Texture

96-106

6

Thurs., 26 Sept.

C.P.E. Bach,

True Art...

G

430-445

7

Tues., 1 Oct.

Ch. 9, Real Imitation, Dbl Cpt

107-116

7

Thurs., 3 Oct.

Kirnberger,

The Art…

G

266-275

8

Tues., 8 Oct.

Ch. 10, 2-part Canon & Invention

117-130

8

Thurs.,

10

Oct.

FALL

BREAK  

9

Tues., 15 Oct.

Todd,

Mendelssohn’s …

G

27-35

Cherubini,

A Treatise…

G

51-56

9

Thurs., 17 Oct.

Todd,

Mendelssohn’s …

G

47-52

10

Tues., 22 Oct.

Ch. 11, Intro. 3 Voice, 1 to 1 & Dimin.

131-140

10

Thurs., 24 Oct.

Lester,

Compositional Theory 

G

173-192

11

Tues., 29 Oct.

Ch. 12, Dimin. & 3 Voice Chorale Prelude 141-154

11

Thurs., 31 Oct.

Mozart,

Attwood Studien* 

G

167-179

12

Tues., 5 Nov.

Ch. 13, Chromaticism

155-166

12

Thurs., 7 Nov.

Mozart,

Attwood Studien* 

G

180-221

13

Tues., 12 Nov.

Ch. 14, Free Cpt. 3 Voices Ext 2 Reprise 167-176

13

Thurs., 14 Nov.

NotesInvertCpt16thCent 

H

(9)

Reading Calendar for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected]

3 Aug. 2013

14

Tues., 19 Nov.

Ch. 15, Tonal Imitation, Inv. Cpt

177-193

14

Thurs., 21 Nov.

15

Tues., 26 Nov.

Ch. 16, Add Cpt Devices, Canon

194-208

15

Thurs., 28 Nov.

THANKSGIVING

16

Tues., 3 Dec.

Christensen,

Hist. Mus. Theory 

G

554-602

16

Thurs. 5 Dec.

* * *** * * * * * * * * * * * *

G = required for graduate students, H = a Hermann handout that is supplementary but for all

class members to read.

Supplementary readings are intended to enrich our textbook, help reorient past education to

current thought, or fill holes in backgrounds. These are written by me.

 Please do not distribute them!

Undergraduates are, of course, welcome to read the required graduate readings to enrich their

knowledge; they are just not responsible for them.

The required graduate readings are in an informal & abbreviated form. See this course’s

bibliography for the formal reference.

* = Mozart’s writing is in red ink, and Attwood’s is in black ink. The Basso fondamentale is a

line that has the same rhythm as the bass line but consists of chordal roots. It is an analysis of the

passage and is not to be performed. This is a volume in the Mozart Collected Works.

GRADUATE STUDENTS: For the G readings above, prepare two observations from the reading

that you will tell to the undergraduates in class. These should be understandable to them in the

context of the Gauldin and my handouts. These observations should be of interest or even better

could be put to use in analysis or composition in this style. You will be given five minutes for

each of you to communicate your points. You may provide a well designed and not overburdened

handout to assist you in communicating. You are not to try and cover the whole reading nor

necessarily the most important points. Focus on what can be rather easily communicated and

absorbed that is of some use.

(10)

Studying and Listening Calendar for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

 Week no.

Date Due

Piece

Ch. No. & Topic

1

Tues., 20 Aug.

Christ lag in Todesbanden 

1: Intro

sing, memorize tune!

2

Tues., 27 Aug.

Bach,

Anna Magdelena Bach 

3: Cpt Ped Fndtns

Notebook 

, Minuet in G maj.

2

Thurs., 29 Aug.

Handel, Suite in D min.

4: 2 Voices 1:1

Sarabande G125 (Suite = Lesson)

3

Tues., 3 Sept.

Bach,

 French Suite 

Bm

5: 2 Voice Dimin.

Sarabande 

4

Tues., 10 Sept.

Haydn, String Quartet in G maj.

6:

2 Voice Chorale Prelude

Op. 76, No. 3 II Poco Adagio

5

Tues., 17 Sept.

Bach,

 French Suite 

C min

7: Binary (2 reprise)

Courante 

6

Tues., 24 Sept.

Bach,

WTC 1

, Prelude #2 C min

8:

More 2 Voice Dimin.

7

Tues., 1 Oct.

Bach,

 French Suite 

Dm

9: Imitation Dbl Cpt 

Minuet 1

8

Tues., 8 Oct.

Bach,

2 Part Invention 

in D min

10: 2 part canon, Inv 

10

Tues., 22 Oct.

Handel, Suite in B

Ô

maj.

11: 3 Part 1:1 & Dim

Aria con Variazioni,

HG II/ii/I

11

Tues., 29 Oct.

Pachelbel,

Partita: Christus der 

12:

Dim3PartChoralePrelude

ist mein Leben 

12

Tues., 10 Nov.

Purcell,

 Dido’s Lament 

13: Chromaticism

13

Tues., 12 Nov.

Bach,

Partita No. 2 

C min.

14:

Extended Binary (2 reprise)

Capriccio 

15

Tues., 3 Dec.

Bach,

WTC 1

, Fugue #21 B

Ô

maj.

15: ImitationMoreInvrtCpt 

(11)
(12)

Homework Calendar for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected]

3 Aug. 2013

 Week no.

Date Due

Homework

Pages

1

Tues.,

Aug.

20

Set  

Christ lag in Todesbanden 

in our Anthology 

1

Thurs.,

22

Aug.

#1

&

#2

30,

31 (Ch.

2)

2

Tues.,

27

Aug.

#4a

32 (Ch.

2

2

Thurs., 29 Aug.

Add a middle voice & embellish

40

(Ch. 3)

3

Tues., 3 Sept.

#1, #2 (odd numbered)

50, 50-51 (Ch. 4)

#1 (odd numbered), #2, #3b

55-56 (Ch. 4)

3

Thurs.,

5

Sept.

#2

64-65 (Ch.

5)

4

Tues.,

10

Sept.

#2,

#3

68

(Ch.

5)

4

Thurs.,

12

Sept.

#1,

#3,

#4b

73,

74 (Ch.

6)

5

Tues.,

17

Sept.

#1,

#2

81,

82 (Ch.

6)

5

Thurs., 19 Sept.

#3

start binary, 1

st 

part

91

(Ch. 7)

6

Tues., 24 Sept.

#2

finish binary, 2

nd

part

95

(Ch. 7)

6

Thurs., 26 Sept.

#1

figuration prelude

105

(Ch. 8)

7

Tues.,

1

Oct.

#2

105-106

(Ch.

8)

7

Thurs.,

3

Oct.

#1,

#2a

111,

112

(Ch.

9)

8

Tues., 8 Oct.

#3 do examples in maj. & min.

116

(Ch. 9)

8

Thurs.,

10

Oct.

FALL

BREAK  

9

Tues., 15 Oct.

(take home midterm due)

9

Thurs.,

17

Oct.

#2

122

(Ch.

10)

10

Tues., 22 Oct.

#4 (entire invention, 20-40 bars)

130

(Ch. 10)

10

Thurs., 24 Oct.

#1a, #1

133-134, 140 (Ch. 11)

11

Tues., 29 Oct.

(none)

11

Thurs.,

31

Oct.

#1,

#1,

144,

153

(Ch.

12)

12

Tues.,

5

Nov.

#3b

(Vater unser im Himmelreich) 

153-154 (Ch. 12)

12

Thurs.,

7

Nov.

#1-3

164-165

(Ch.

13)

13

Tues., 12 Nov.

(none)

13

Thurs., 14 Nov.

#1, #1

170, 173-174 (Ch. 14)

14

Tues., 19 Nov.

(start 26 Nov.

Sarabande 

very early as this is long!)

14

Thurs., 21 Nov.

#1 (1

st 

Vol. only), 4 analyses of

185-186 (Ch. 15)

tonal answers, #2 b, d, f, g

15

Tues., 26 Nov.

#2, Entire Sarabande 

176 (Ch. 14)

Length (part 1, 16-20; part 2, 20-32), use

2 different sequences,

(13)

Homework Calendar for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected]

3 Aug. 2013

bars) of invertible cpt in 3 parts (present combinations so that each part 

serves as the bass for the others; use embellishments (diminutions) of 

simpler structural lines that use motives derived from your theme where

reasonable; start off each part (reprise) of the binary with imitation.

Be  sure that each of the three distinct lines of the triple counterpoint occurs in the bass  at some point in the piece.

15

Thurs., 28 Nov.

THANKSGIVING

16

Tues., 3 Dec.

#1b, #2, #3, #4c, #5 do perms so that 192-193 (Ch. 15)

each distinct line is in the bass one.

16

Thurs. 5 Dec.

(none)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Note bene

(Italian for “note well”)

 As these are nearly as difficult to correct as they are to write, please be sure that you hand in assignments

beautifully copied (or computer generated), on full sheets of paper, including your homework id, chapter

number, and number of assignment from the chapter (e.g. twinkle toes, ch. 27, no. 2). Please do not xerox

from the Gauldin text and try to cram your answer upon it.

Should a homework paper not conform, I will return it  without corrections or grade at m y discretion.

In your assignments, analyze everything such as dissonance-types, formal parts, contrapuntal devices

(canon, invertible cpt,

Vorimitation 

, imitation, etc.), roman numerals, figured bass, cadences, sequences,

motives (show with brackets beneath or above score as is visually clear), etc. This helps me diagnose what 

might be less than well understood.

When Gauldin posses a question in an assignment, answer it! 

This course may expose holes in your past education or memory lapses. At the first sign of such, see me

either via office hours or by appointment if you can not make my office hours.

Homework in bold

are worth 5% course grade each for undergraduates and 3% for graduates. There are

six. The lowest score is dropped from the average. However, you may not have a bold homework score

dropped. Thus, in total they are worth 25% or 15% respectively of the course grade.

Homework in normal roman type are worth 2% course grade each for undergraduates and 1% for

graduates. There are 19 of them, and the grades of the lowest 2 will be dropped. Thus, in total they are

 worth 34% or 17% respectively of the grade.

The value of both sets of homework then total 32% of the course grade for graduate students and 59% for

undergraduate students.

(14)

Select & Categorized Bibliography for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

Fall 2013

Christensen, Thomas. ed. The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 2001.

General Works on the Fugue

Bullivant, Roger. Fugue. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1971. Horsley, Imogene. Fugue: History and Practice. New York: Free Press, 1966.

Kirkendale, Warren. Fugue and Fugato in Rococo and Classical Chamber Music. Rev. 2nd ed. Trans. Bent, Margaret and Warren Kirkendale. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1979.

Mann, Alfred. The Study of the Fugue: The First History of Fugal Theory, Including Texts and Music of the Classical Treatises. New York: Norton, 1965.

Renwick, William. Analyzing Fugue: A Schenkerian Approach. Stuyvesant, New York: Pendragon Press, 1995. Walker, Paul Mark. Theories of Fugue from the Age of Josquin to the Age of Bach. Rochester New York:

University of Rochester Press, 2000.

Historical Works on 18th-Century Counterpoint

Albrechtsberger, Johann Georg. Gründliche Anweising zur Komposition. trans. Sabilla Novello. London: Novello, Ewer, and Co., n.d. (mid to late 19th cent.)

Bridge, J. Frederick. Double Counterpoint and Canon. New York: H.W. Gray Co., 1881.

Cherubini, Luigi. A Treatise on Counterpoint and Fugue. rev. Bennett, Joseph. ed. Halvey, Fromental. intro. Fétis, François-Joseph. trans. Clarke, Mary Cowden. New York: Belwin Mills, n.d. (1835) Fux, Joseph. The Study of Counterpoint from Gradus ad Parnassum. Trans. Alfred Mann. New York:

Norton, 1965.

Gedalge, André. Treatise on the Fugue. trans. Davis, Ferdinand. Foreword Milhaud, D arius. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1965.

Goetschius, Percy.

 Elementary Counterpoint 

. New York: G. Schirmer, 1910.

––––––.

Applied Counterpoint.

New York: G. Schirmer, 1902.

 Jadassohn, S.

A Manual of Single, Double, Triple and Quadruple Counterpoint.

7th ed., trans. Dr. Theodore

Baker. New York: G. Schirmer, 1902 from the 3rd German ed. of 1896.

Krumbholtz, Gerald. Friedrich Wilhelm Marpurg’s Abhandlung von der Fuge. (1753-54). Ph.D. dissertation: Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester, 1995.

Prout, Ebenezer.

 Fugal Analysis.

London: Augener, 1892.

 ––––––. Fugue. London: Augener, 1891.

 ––––––. Double Counterpoint and Canon. London: Augener, 1891.  ––––––. Counterpoint: Strict and Free, London, Augner, 1890.

Schenker, Heinrich. Counterpoint: A Translation of Kontrapunkt. ed. Rothgeb, John. trans. Rothgeb, John and Jürgen Thym. 2 vols. New York: G. Schirmer: 1987.

Schoenberg, Arnold. Preliminary Exercises in Counterpoint. ed. Stein, Leonard.New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1964.

(15)

Select & Categorized Bibliography for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

Fall 2013

Historical Works on Counterpoint, cont.

Taneiev, Serge Ivanovitch. Convertible Counterpoint in the Strict Style. trans. Brower, G. Ackley. intro. Koussevitzky, Serge. Boston: Bruce Humphries, 1962.

Works on Compositional Process & Its Use in Education in the 18th-Century

Eckert, Stefan. “‘So, you want to write a Minuet?’ Historical Perspectives in Teaching Theory.”  Music Theory Online, vol. 11, no. 2 (June 2005).

http://mto.societymusictheory.org/issues/mto.05.11.2/mto.05.11.2.eckert.html

Federhofer, H. “Fux’s Gradus ad Parnassum as Viewed by Heinrich Schenker,” Music Theory Spectrum vol. 4, 1982:66-75.

Gjerdingen, Robert O. Music in the Galant Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Kirnberger, Johann Philipp. The Art of Strict Musical Composition. trans. Beach, David and Jürgen Thym. Intro. and ed. Beach, David. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1982. Lester, Joel. Compositional Theory in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard

University Press, 1992.

Mann, Alfred. The Great Composer as Teacher and Student: Theory and Practice of Composition. New York: Dover, 1994.

 ––––––. “Haydn’s Elementarbuch: A Document of Classic Counterpoint Instruction,”  Music Forum vol. 3, 1970: 197-237.

 ––––––. “Beethoven’s Contrapuntal Studies with Haydn, ” Musical Quarterly vol. 66, 1970: 711-726. [Martino, Donald.] 178 Chorale Harmonizations of J. S. Bach: A Comparative Edition for Study. Newton,

Massachusetts, Dantalian, 1985.

Mattheson, Johann Der vollkommene Capellmeister: A Revised Translation with Critical Commentary, trans. & ed. Ernest C. Harriss, (Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Research Press, 1981.

Mozart, Wolfgang. Thomas Attwoods Theorie und Kompositionsstudien bei Mozart. Neue Ausgabe Sämtlicher Werke, Werkgruppe 30, Band 1. New York: Bärenreiter. 1965.

Sanguinetti, Giorgio. The Art of Partimento: History, Theory, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Todd, R. Larry. Mendelssohnn’s Musical Education: a Study and Edition of His Exercises in Composition.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

18th-Century Aesthetics of Music

Baker, Nancy Kovaleff and Thomas Christensen. Aesthetics and the art of Musical Composition in the German Enlightenment: Selected Writings of Johann Georg Sulzer and Heinrich Christ oph Koch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Bonds, Mark Evan. Wordless Rhetoric: Music Form and the Metaphor of the Oration. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991.

le Hurray, Peter and James Day. Music and Aesthetics in Eighteenth and Early-Nineteenth Centuries. abridged ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

(16)

Select & Categorized Bibliography for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

Fall 2013

18th-Century Aesthetics of Music, cont.

Mirka, Danuta and Kofi Agawu, eds. Communication in Eighteenth-Century Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Ratner, Leonard G. Classic Music: Expression, Form, and Style. New York: G. Schirmer, 1980.

Tuning and Temperament, Key Characteristics, and Cons. and Diss.

Barbour, J. Murray. Tuning and Temperament: A Historical Survey. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State College Press, 1951.

Steblin, Rita. A History of Key Characteristics in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press, 1996.

Tenney, James. A History of ‘Consonance’ and ‘Dissonance’. New York: Excelsior, 1988. n.a. Tuning & temperament bibliography.

ftp://ella.mills.edu/ccm/tuning/papers/bib.html

18th–Century Performance Practice

Arnold, F.T. The Art of Accompaniment from a Thorough-Bass: As practised in the XVIIth & XVIII Centuries. vol. 1. New York: Dover, 1965.

Bach, C.P.E. Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments. trans. & ed. Mitchell, William J. New York: Norton, 1949.

Bach, Johann Sebastian. Precepts and Principles for Playing the Thorough-Bass or Accompanying in Four  parts… for His Students in Music. facisimile ed.. ed. Pamela Poulin. New York: Oxford University

Press, 1994.

Buelow, George J. Thorough-Bass Accompaniment according to Johann David Heinichen. rev. ed. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1986.

Cook, Nicholas. “At the Borders of Musical Identity: Schenker, Corelli and the Graces.”  Music Analysis vol. 18, no. 2 (1999): 179-233.

Couperin, François. The Art of Playing the Harpsichord. ed. and trans. Halford, Margery. New York: Alfred, 1974.

Dreyfus, Laurence. Bach and the Patterns of Invention. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1996.

 ––––––. Bach’s Continuo Group: Players and Practices in His Vocal Works. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1987.

Espinosa, Damian. C.P.E. Bach’s Fantasias: The Rhetorical Argument. Albuquerque: Masters Thesis, University of New Mexico, 2000.

Gjerdingen, Robert O. issue ed. Journal of Music Theory vol. 51, no. 1 on the Italian Thoroughbass Tradition, “Partimenti.”

(17)

Select & Categorized Bibliography for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

Fall 2013

18th–Century Performance Practice, cont.

Hefling, Stephen E. Rhythmic Alteration in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Music: Notes Inegales and  Overdotting. New York: Schirmer, 1993.

Hudson, Richard. Stolen Time: the History of Tempo Rubato. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.

le Hurray, Peter. Authenticity in Performance: Eighteeth-Century Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Lester, Joel. Bach’s Works for Solo Violin: Style, Structure, Performance. Oxford University Press, 1999. Little, Meredith & Natalie Jenne. Dance and the Music of J. S. Bach. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana Univ.

Press, 1991.

Mather, Betty Bang and David Lasocki. Free Ornamentation in Woodwind Music: 1700-1775. New York: McGinnis & Marx, 1976.

Mozart, Leopold. A Treatise on the Fundamental Principles of Violin Playing. trans. Knocker, Editha. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948.

Muffat, Georg. Georg Muffat on Performance Practice: The texts from Florilegium Primum, Florilegium Secundum, and Auserlesene Instrumentalmusik. a new trans. with commentary David K. Wilson et alia. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2001.

Neumann, Frederick. Performance Practices of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. New York: G. Schirmer, 1993.

Quantz, Johann Joachim. On Playing the Flute. trans. and intro. Reilly, Edward R. New York: The Free Press, 1966.

Schulenberg, David. The Keyboard Music of J. S. Bach. New York: G. Schirmer, 1992.

Whitmore, Philip. Unpremeditated Art: The Cadenza in the Classical Keyboard Concerto. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

Williams, Peter. The Organ Music of J.S. Bach. 3 vols. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.  ––––––. Figured Bass Accompaniment. 2 vols. Edinburgh, 1970.

20

th

- and 21

st

-Century Textbooks on 18th-Century Counterpoint

Gauldin, Robert. A Practical Approach to Eighteenth-Century Counterpoint. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall: 1988.

Kennan, Kent Wheeler.

Counterpoint Based on Eighteenth-Century Practice,

2nd ed. Englewood

Cliffs, New Jersey, 1972. 1st ed, 1959.

Kitson, C. H. Invertible Counterpoint and Canon. New York: Oxford University press, 1928.

Krenek, Ernst. An Outline of Tonal Counterpoint in the Style of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Boosey and Hawkes, 1958.

Morris, R. O.

 Foundations of Practical Harmony and Counterpoint.

2nd ed. New York: St.Martin’s Press, 1931.

(18)

Select & Categorized Bibliography for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

Fall 2013

20

th

- and 21

st

-Century Textbooks on 18th-Century Counterpoint, cont.

Parks, Richard S. Eighteenth-Century Counterpoint and Tonal Structure. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984.

Piston, Walter. Counterpoint . New York: Norton, 1947.

Richardson, A. Madeley. Helps to Fugue Writing: Based on Bach’s “Das Wohltemperierte Klavier.” forward Rubin Goldmark. New York: H.W. Gray Co., 1930.

Salzer, Felix and Carl Schachter. Counterpoint in Composition: The Study of Voice Leading. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.

Schubert, Peter and Christopher Neidhofer.

Baroque Counterpoint.

Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson

Prentice-Hall, 2006.

 Verrall, John W.

 Fugue and Invention in Theory and Practice.

Palo Alto, California: Pacific Books, 1966.

Some Analytical Monographs on 18th- (+ one 17th-) Century Counterpoint or Its Use

Anson-Cartwright, Mark. “Elision and the Embellished Final Cadence in J. S. Bach’s Preludes.” Music Analysis vol. 26, no. 3 (2007): 267-288.

Badura-Skoda, Eva & Paul. Interpreting Mozart: The Performance of His Piano Pieces and Other Compositions, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2008

Beach, David. Aspects of Unity in J. S. Bach’s Partitas and Suites: An Analytical Study. Rochester, New York: Rochester University Press, 2005.

Berry, Wallace. “J.S. Bach’s Fugue in Dƒ minor (WTC I No. 8): A naïve approach to linear analysis,”  In

Theory Only, Vol. 2/10 (Jan. 1977), pp. 4-7.

Brinkman, Alexander. “The Melodic Process in Johann Sebastian Bach’s Orgelbüchlein,” Music Theory Spectrum, Vol. 2 (1980), pp. 46-73.

Bruhn, Siglind. J.S. Bach's Well-Tempered Clavier: Analysis and In-depth Interpretation. Hong Kong: Mainer International Ltd., 1993, four volumes.

Cinnamon, Howard, “Durational Reduction and Bach’s C Major Invention.” In Theory Only, vol. 7/1 (May 1983), pp. 25-36.

Harrison, Daniel. “Heads and Tails: Subject Play in Bach’s Fugues.”

Music Theory Spectrum 

vol. 30, no. 1

(Spring 2008): 152-163.

 ––––––. “Rhetoric and Fugue: An Analytical Application,” Music Theory Spectrum 7/1 (Spring 1990), 1-42.

Hermann, Richard. “Charlie Parker’s Solo to Ornithology: Facets of Counterpoint, Analysis, and Pedagogy” Perspectives of New Music vol. 42, no. 2 (Summer 2004): 222-262.

 ––––––. “Boundaries Transgressed: Text-Painting in Dido’s Lament.” unpub. paper delivered before the joint annual meetings of the Rocky Mountain Society for Music Theory and the Rocky Mountain Chapter of the  American Musicological Society, hosted by Arizona State Univ., 31 March 2007.

(19)

Select & Categorized Bibliography for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

Fall 2013

Some Analytical Monographs on 18th-Century Counterpoint or Its Use, cont.

Keller, Hermann. The Well-Tempered Clavier by Johann Sebastian Bach. trans. Leigh Gerdine. New York: Norton, 1976.

Larson, Steve. “J.S. Bach’s To-Part Invention in C Major.” In Theory Only, vol 7/1 (May 1983), pp. 31-45.

McKee, Eric. “Influences of the Early Eighteenth-Century Social Minuet on the Minuets from J. S. Bach’s French Suites, BWV 812-17.” Music Analysis vol. 18, no. 2 (1999): 235-260.

Neumeyer, David. “The Two Versions of J.S. Bach’s A-minor Invention [BWV 784].” Indiana Theory  Review, Vol. 4/2 (1981), pp. 1-22.

Petty, Wayne. “C.P.E. Bach and the fine art of transposition.” in Schenker Studies 2. ed. Hedi Siegel. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press, 1999, pp. 49-66.

Riemann, Hugo. Analysis of J.S. Bach’s Wohltemperirtes Clavier (48 Preludes and fugues). 2 vols. trans. Shedlock, John South. London: Augener, n.d.

Schachter, Carl. “Bach’s Fugue in Bß Major, Well-Tempered Clavier Book I, No. XXI.” Music Forum,

Vol. 3 (1973), pp. 239-67.

Siegel, Hedi. “A source for Schenker’s study of thorough bass: his annotated copy of J.S. Bach’s

Generalbassbüchlein.” in Schenker Studies, ed. Hedi Siegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 15-28.

Schenker, Heinrich. J.S. Bach’s Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue: Critical Edition with Commentary. trans. and ed. Siegel, Hedi. New York: Longman, 1984.

 ––––––. “A Contribution to the Study of Ornamentation” trans. Hedi Siegel in The Music Forum. vol. 4 eds. Felix Salzer and Carl Schachter. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976.

 ––––––. “The Largo of Bach’s Sonata No. 3 for solo violin” [BWV 1005]. The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, Vol. 1. (1925), ed. William Drabkin, trans. John Rothgeb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp. 31-8.

 ––––––. “The Prelude of Bach’s partita No. 3 for solo violin.” [BWV 1006] The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, Vol. 1. (1925), ed. William Drabkin, trans. John Rothgeb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp.39-53.

 ––––––. “Bach: Twelve Short Preludes, No. 6” [BWV 940] ), The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, ed. William Drabkin, trans. Hedi Siegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp. 54-7.  ––––––. “Bach: Twelve Short Preludes, No. 7” [BWV 941] ), The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, Vol.

1. (1925), ed. William Drabkin, trans. Hedi Siegel.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp. 58-61.

 ––––––. “Bach: Twelve Short Preludes, No. 12” [BWV 942], The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, Vol. 1. (1925), ed. William Drabkin, trans. Hedi Siegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp. 62-66.

 ––––––. “Domenico Scarlatti: Keyboard Sonata in D minor.” The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, Vol. 1. (1925), ed. William Drabkin, trans. Ian B ent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp. 67-74.

(20)

Select & Categorized Bibliography for 18th-Century Counterpoint, Music 406 and 506

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico,

Center for the Arts, room 2104, [email protected], 505 277-2419

Fall 2013

Some Analytical Monographs on 18th-Century Counterpoint or Its Use, cont.

 ––––––. Domenico Scarlatti: Keyboard Sonata in G Major.” ), The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, Vol. 1. (1925), ed. William Drabkin, trans. Ian B ent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. pp. 75-80.

 ––––––. “The Organic nature of Fugue, as Demonstrated in the C minor Fugue from Bach’s

Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1” in The Masterwork in Music: A Yearbook, vol. 2, ed. Drabin, William. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. pp. 31-54.

 ––––––. “The Sarabande of Bach’s Suite No. 3 for solo violon cello.” [BWV 1009] in The Masterwork in  Music: A Yearbook, vol. 2, ed. Drabin, William. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

pp. 55-58.

Travis, Roy. “J.S. Bach, Invention No. 1 in C Major: Reduction and Graph.” In Theory Only, Vol. 2/7 (Oct. 1976), pp. 29-33.

Tovey, Donald Francis. A Preface: Forty-Eight Preludes and Fugues by J.S. Bach: Critical Explanatory  Notes to each Prelude and Fugue. New York: Oxford University Press, 1924.

 ––––––. A Companion to “The Art of Fugue” J.S. Bach. London: Oxford University Press, 1931. Tussler, Robert. The Style of J.S. Bach’s Chorale Preludes. New York: Da Capo Press,

1968.

 Väisälä, Olli. “Bach’s Inventions: Figuration, Register, Structure, and the ‘Clear Way to Develop Inventions

Properly’”.

Music Theory Spectrum 

vol. 31, no. 1 (Spring 2009): 101-152.

Willner, Channan. “Handel’s Borrowings from Telemann: An Analytical View.” in Trends in Schenkerian Research. ed. Allen Cadwallader. New York: Schirmer Books, 1990.

 ––––––. “Sequential expansion and Handelian phrase rhythm.” in Schenker Studies 2. ed. Hedi Siegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 192-221.

Winold, Allen. Bach’s Cello Suites: Analyses & Explorations, 2 vols. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2007.

(21)

Tonal Music Error Key Sheet

Richard Hermann, Assoc. Prof. of Music, UNM

1

ALWAYS REFER TO THE MOST CURRENT VERSION OF THIS ERROR KEY  revised Aug. 15, 1997

Error Number Error Name and Commentary Page Description in Text Aldwell & Schachter, 2nd ed. VOICE-LEADING

Perfect Consonance Treatment 

1. Parallel 8ves, 5ths or unisons pp. 72-3

2. Contrary 8ves or 5ths (also called antiparallel) between outer voices; weak otherwise pp. 74-5 but 8 to 5 or 5 to 8 are ok if in contrary or oblique motion

3. Hidden (also called implied or beaten) 8ves or 5ths between outer voices; pp. 75-6 approach or leave perfect consonances in outer voices by contrary or oblique motion

 Dissonance Treatment 

4. Chordal 7th not properly resolved (down by step to a cons.)

5. Chordal 7th not properly prepared by cons. (in Chorale/Hymn style only) 6. Dissonance not properly prepared by cons. (in Chorale/Hymn style only) 7. Dissonance not properly resolved by step to a cons.

8. Suspension-types 7-6 and 4-3 should not have their notes of resolution (6 or 3) sound simultaneously (in another voice) against the suspension’s diss. (7 or 4).

9. Mislabelled dissonance-type

10. Omitted dissonance-type in analysis, e.g. pt, N, IN, appog., sus., etc. 11. Dissonance-type not used in Hymn/Chorale style

 Doubling Problems

12. Needlessly incomplete chord p. 65-6.

13. Incorrect: doubled scale degree 7 (leading-tone) in V, viiø , or vii° and their 7th chord versions; the same for applied leading-tones in applied V, viiø or vii°

harmonies and their 7th chord versions but ok within an expansion (except last chord of expansion) 14. Doubled altered, that is not in the key, tone (incorrect only in four or fewer voices)

15. V harmony in minor key needs a raised chordal 3rd; it is a major chord but for pp. 86-7 exceptions, see pp. 241-3, 260, 274-6, 427-9. (Also for raised root for vii˚ in minor)

16. Do not double dissonances in four or fewer parts

17. Do not double chordal 7ths in four parts or less; in more parts the less prominent chordal 7th

resolves up by step while the more prominent chordal 7th resolves normally, down by step to a cons.

Motion and Spacing Problems 

18. Voice-crossing (avoid in Chorale/Hymn style & simple fig. bass only) p. 76 19. Voice overlap or underlap (avoid in Chorale/Hymn style & simple fig. bass only) p. 76 20. Incorrect use of melodic leap in Chorale/Hymn style or in simple fig. bass pp. 70-1 21. All voices in similar motion (but ok in arpeggio or within an expansion)

22. Scale degree 7 in outer voice of V, viiø or vii° harmonies and their 7th chord versions is not lead up by step to scale degree 1; the same for applied leading-tones in applied V, viiø or vii° harmonies and their 7th chord versions

23. Poor spacing of voices; adjacent voices too far apart, keep in P8ve or less pp. 67-8 (except tenor & bass which can be even a 12th apart)

24. Cross-relations (e.g. C then C#) are best in the same voice; not between outer voices p. 217 25. No melodic augmented or diminished intervals in Chorale/Hymn style except descending dim.

5th which is then lead up by semitone.

26. Aug. intervals are voice-lead outwards and dimin. intervals are lead inwards 27. Omitted voice (usually an inner voice) in your voice-leading

28. Transfer of preparation of diss. should occur in the same octave; it’s just in a different voice 29. Transfer of resolution of diss. or leading-tone in V or vii° or applied V or vii° should occur in

the same octave; it’s just in a different voice

30. Transfer of chordal 7ths into a different register can occur within an expansion but when the expansion ends, the chordal 7th must resolve (down by step to a cons. in the next chord) in the same (new) register.

31. Transfers should be indicated by connecting the pitches with dotted lines. 32. Voice out of range p. 64

33. Needs variety of types of motion between outer voices; use a variety of oblique, merging or diverging contrary, and similar motions

34. Needs rhythmic variety 35. Needs variety in range

(22)

Tonal Music Error Key Sheet

Richard Hermann, Assoc. Prof. of Music, UNM

2

ALWAYS REFER TO THE MOST CURRENT VERSION OF THIS ERROR KEY  revised Aug. 15, 1997

FIGURED BASS 37. A figure not called for by the figured bass is in your voice-leading

38. A number from the figured bass that is either literally specified or understood (implied) is not present in the voice-leading

39. Horizontally aligned figured bass numbers must be reflected in the voice-leading by placing them in the same voice

40. Omitted figured bass in analysis 41. Mislabelled figured bass

42. Improper rhythmic alignment of horizontal figures in the figured bass; a figure further to the right occurs later in time

43. Do not double 4th (diss.) measured from bass in six-four chords; usually bass note is doubled

44. Six-four chord improperly used. pp. 284-304.

HARMONY

Progression Problems

45. Chord not studied yet: used incorrectly or avoid until studied

46. Poor harmonic progression (chords enclosed within a box-like figure) 47. Change harmony across barline unless part of a multi-measure expansion 48. Maintain harmonic rhythm here

49. End in the home key but there are a few exceptions in the literature that frequently have to do with text painting in vocal music

Chord Structure Problems

50. Diminished triads in six-three except in circle-of-5ths sequences on weak time units and as the back end of a supertonic voice-exchange in minor keys, that is 6-10 never 10-6; but voice-exchanges starting with ø 7& ˚ 7 are ok.

51. Applied (also called secondary) V or vii° chords and their 7th chord versions used incorrectly; applied V has root motion up a 4th or down a fifth to the next chord and must have a major t riad and may have a m7th; applied vii° has a root motion up a semitone to the next chord and must have a diminished triad and either a m7th or ° 7th. The next chord may not be based on a diminished triad; however, see pp. 530-34

52. Augmented triads not part of 18th and early 19th century style; no augmented III chord in minor keys 53. Chord can’t simultaneously have two different qualities: e.g. majorand minor or minorand 

diminished etc.; check the chord and your analytical symbols and correct. 54. Chord structure is incorrect; no such chord in traditional tonality

Chord Labeling Problems 

55. Mislabelled chord quality (maj., min., dimin., half-dimin., etc.): I = major, i = minor, ii° = dimin., iiø = half dimin. seventh chord

56. Omitted harmonic roman numeral in analysis

57. Mislabelled root of harmony (wrong roman numeral) in analysis or function (e.g. not an applied V, etc.) 58. Enharmonic equivalent harmony, tonal region, or key is the better understanding here

 Expansion Problems

59. Expansion not labelled in analysis 60. Incorrect expansion in analysis

61. Incorrect non-structural chord within expansion 62. Omitted voice-exchange in analysis

63. Voice-exchange incorrect; must be 10-6 or 6-10 between the same pair of voices (e.g. sop. & bass or alto & tenor, etc.) and both chords must have same harmonic function; six-four chords do not

participate in voice-exchanges because they are usually dissonant chords

64. Expansion does not extend over into the next phrase. This next phrase is a “new beginning” in character. 65. Include the non-structural chords of an expansion within ( )s.

66. Durational emphasis (agogic accent) of a chord or expansion of a chord should emphasize the meter but ok if another meter is temporarily in action (e.g. a hemiola)

(23)

Tonal Music Error Key Sheet

Richard Hermann, Assoc. Prof. of Music, UNM

3

ALWAYS REFER TO THE MOST CURRENT VERSION OF THIS ERROR KEY  revised Aug. 15, 1997 Modulation & Tonicization Problems 

68. Omitted Pivot chord in analysis

69. Mislabelled pivot chord in analysis (wrong location)

70. Not a pivot chord because this chord does not occur in both tonal regions or “keys” 71. Mislabelled modulation-type in analysis; types are pivot, chrom., sequence, & enharm. 72. Omitted modulation-type in analysis

73. Needs variety of tonal regions (“modulation”) or harmonic variety 74. Mislabelled key or tonal region

75. Omitted key or tonal region in analysis

 Mode Mixture and Sequence Problems

76. Mislabelled mode mixture-type 77. Omitted mode mixture-type in analysis

78. Altered root of chord not indicated in the analysis. Sharp, flat, or natural sign is missing from in front of the roman numeral

79. Mislabelled sequence-type

80. Omitted Sequence-type in analysis

81. Sequence-type not studied: used incorrectly or avoid until studied

82. VII (subtonic) is used for the circle-of-5ths sequences in minor keys and not vii° (leading-tone); recall VII’s root is the key signature’s 7th scale-degree and vii° ’s root is the raised 7th scale degree

CADENCES

83. Bass motion in authentic cadences must be scale degree 5 to scale degree 1. (root position chords); this is not a cadence because the bass line is incorrect

84. Bass note of V harmony in half (also called semicadence) must be scale degree 5 (root position chord) 85. Harmony of V in half cadence is a pure major triad in 18th century music; sometimes a V7 in

19th cent. music; half cadence also called semicadence 86. Cadential six-four chords start on strong time units

87. Deceptive cadences are followed immediately by authentic cadences

88. Deceptive cadences do not end pieces, and they usually are not the first cadence in a piece 89. This is not a cadence because the harmonic progression is incorrect

90. Label of AC for authentic cadence is not enough: PAC or IAC here: PAC has soprano on chordal root; IAC has either chordal 3rd or 5th in soprano.

91. Mislabelled cadence-type 92. Omitted cadence-type in analysis

93. Plagal cadences (“amen” cadences) are usually embellishments of the final tonic chord of an authentic cadence. It is typically more of a type of cadential e xtension than an independent cadence. 94. Cadence missing in your writing assignment

95. Fermata usually indicates cadence location in J. S. Bach chorales; it does not mean hold the chord.

MISCELLANEOUS

96. Incomplete paper, complete and turn in again for a grade within one week. I will correct and return incomplete homework only if I have the time.

97. Two different pitches that share the same letter-name are simultaneously present (in Choral/Hymn style only). e.g. C and C#

98. Incorrect stem direction: notes on staff above midline have descending stems; notes beneath midline have ascending stems; notes on midline may have stems in either direction; when two voices share the same staff, the usually higher voice has all of its notes stemmed upwards and

the usually lower voice has all of its notes stemmed downwards even if they cross. 99. Voices are not in proper vertical (harmonic) rhythmic alignment

100. Needs articulation or variety of  101. Needs dynamics variety of 

102. Label how phrases relate to one another; e.g. parallel period, contrasting period, etc. 103. Do not change or omit given material.

104. Do not add to given material.

(24)

a e ome

term xam or us c

,

t - entury ounterpo nt 

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico Room 2104, Center for the Arts, [email protected], 277-2419

Topic:

Choose one of the following. The midterm exam will employ standard academic

formating. If you are unsure of what that entails, see me during my office hours. The

Oxford Music Online and Grove Music Online (available free online courtesy of UNM

libraries) are the only reliable online sources. If you do not know how to access these

sites, see me during my office hours or see a librarian. Be sure to cite not just literal

quotations from other authors but also when you borrow or adapt their ideas.

Biographical, historical, and other non-theoretical information are unwelcome for this

midterm.

(1)

Compare and contrast 5

th

Species Counterpoint (either J. J. Fux or Salzer

and Schacter) with the ideas in Gauldin’s chapters 4 through 6.

(2)

Compare and contrast a Minuet by J. S. Bach from his

 French Suites 

with

one from a piano sonata by Joseph Haydn. Present a map/analysis of both

pieces as appendices as well as copies of the scores. Use them to support 

 your ideas. Be specific (measure and beat) in locating your observations.

Length:

Undergraduates: Four to Six Pages.; Graduates: Six to Ten Pages.

Due:

The first class meeting after fall break.

Complete Analysis:

In the map for each piece label keys, cadence types, modulation types

(how done), sequence types, contrapuntal devices (e.g. invertible counterpoint type,

canons, points of imitation, stretto, tonal or real answers, etc.), prolongations (aka

expansions or second level analysis), important or unusual motivic work, and so forth.

Types of counterpoint contrast and compare:

how dissonance is used, ideas in the

temporal realm such as meter, design (layout of technical devices), ideas on range,

register, articulations, etc. What is similar and what is different?

Minuet Contrast and compare:

design (layout of all technical devices), tonal structure

(modulations and tonicizations), motivic work, nature of themes, complexity of voice

leading and harmony, use of range, density, articulation, dynamics, phrase organization

(both within and between), etc. What is similar and what is different?

(25)

ra uate tu ent ssay an

resentat on or us c

, t - entury ounterpo nt 

Richard Hermann, Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico

Room 2104, Center for the Arts, [email protected], 277-2419

Select from one of the following options. The essay should range between ten and fifteen

pages in length and employ standard academic formating. If you are unsure of what that 

entails, see me during my office hours. With the exception of Oxford Music Online and

Grove Music Online (available free online courtesy of UNM libraries) are the only 

reliable online sources. If you do not know how to access these sites, see me during my 

office hours or see a librarian. Be sure to cite not just literal quotations from other

authors but also when you borrow or adapt their ideas. Biographical, historical, and other

non-theoretical information should be restricted to a page or preferably less in length.

NB: a well thought out, argued, and written short essay is superior 

to a poorly thought out, argued, or written long essay.

(1)

Compare and contrast Handel’s instruction of Princess Anne and Zelter’s

instruction of Mendelssohn in counterpoint. See Mann and Todd entries from the bib.

(2)

Compare and contrast a harpsichord fugue by Handel or Telemann with

one from Bach’s

Well Tempered Keyboard 

that uses the same contrapuntal devices. Do a

complete analysis of each including maps. Be sure to read Gauldin’s 17

th

and 18

th

chaps.

(3)

Compare and contrast a choral fugue from Handel’s

Messiah 

and one from

Mozart’s

Requiem 

or one of Mendelssohn or Haydn’s oratorios that have similar devices.

See the directions for (2) above. Also read the 21

st 

chapter in the Gauldin text.

(4)

Compare and contrast a fugue for organ by Dietrich Buxthehude or

 Johann Pachelbel and J. S. Bach that uses the same technical devices. See the directions

for (2) above.

(5)

Propose a topic of your choice. Submit a proposal to me in writing before

November. See the handout entitled “Writing Proposals.“ I will respond on the class

meeting before the Thanksgiving break or earlier.

Due:

On the day of the scheduled final examination for this course before 12

noon. Hand it in at the music department office and have the secretary put their own

initials, day, and time of day received. Ask them to put it in my faculty mailbox. There will

be a penalty, at my discretion, for late papers.

Complete Analysis:

In the map for each piece label keys, cadence types, sequence

types, contrapuntal devices (e.g. invertible counterpoint type, canons, points of imitation,

stretto, tonal or real answers, etc.), prolongations (aka expansions or second level

analysis), and so forth.

Proposal Due:

On or before 29 Oct. Consult with me well beforehand. See

handout on writing proposals. All must have the proposal approved before writing.

UNDERGRADUATES may do one of these essays for up to 10% extra credit as desired.

(26)

Some Ideas About Writing Scholarly Proposals in Music Theory

Richard Hermann, Assoc. Prof. of Music, Univ. of New Mexico

The Proposal 

Scholarly courses require term papers or some other kinds of projects with scholarly

components. These are typically due near the end of the semester. The mechanics of writing a

 paper, master’s thesis, or doctoral dissertation are covered in various books found in this

document’s bibliography. Naturally, all writings, including the proposal, shou ld adhere to the

 procedures found within them. Questions will arise about scholarly mechanisms, and your 

 professor can clarify them for the purpose at hand.

The proposal is a document of varying length depending upon its specific use. It can

range from three to even twenty pages in the case of a doctoral dissertation. The purpose of a

 proposal is to convince a faculty advisor, faculty advisory committee, editor, or program

committee for a professional conference that you have a well developed idea, a reasonable plan,

and a command of relevant scholarly literature to proceed with writing the talk, term paper,

thesis, dissertation, or book. Proposals for graduate theory class projects/term papers are usually

due before midterms. Start early as there is much to do!

Here is a list of some items that should appear in most proposals. Some adjustments to

this may be necessary given the nature of the project. These adjustments will either be dictated o r 

negotiated depending upon the circumstances. These should occur roughly in the order presented

here. Item five commonly is not found in proposals but rather in the “finished product.”

(1) The proposal provides the specifics of an hypothesis of some sort (in short, what is the

problem to be addressed;

(2) it outlines a method of some sort that shows the mechanism for testing the hypothesis and

how the results of applying that method will be evaluated;

(3) it lists the works to be examined with the method with some explanation of why they might

References

Related documents

However they have expressed the unavailability of formal decision or policy within the framework of higher educational system to introduce the e-learning method and informed that the

The proposed used of it became increasingly attractive as its activity can be detected using a commercialized personal glucose meter (PGM) as reported by several groups. PGM

Various influential measures, based on different motivational arguments have been designed to measure the influence of observations for unbiased estimators

1VG38 Management of external appliance, knee joint 1GE38 Management of external appliance, larynx NEC 1EE38 Management of external appliance, mandible 1ED38 Management

Se mi -s tr u ct u red int er vi ew s (su bs et -1 1 ) TSD = pre-fi rst treatment Nature, severity and intensit y of fati gue and p er ce ived ef fec tive n es s o f se lf-c

Grilo : Easy Access to Online Multimedia Content LinuxCon Europe 2012, Barcelona.. Plugins

Having examined these concepts the article applies them sequentially to three cases of state/civil society relations, through (a) the February 2011 People of Australia

I wanted to create an inspiring magazine that didn’t feed the mental loop of body image, fashion, beauty, and “health.” After relaying this concept to my reader, Professor