101
101
Bach
Bach
’
’
s
s
Inve
Inve
ntion
ntion
s:
s:
Figur
Figur
ation,
ation,
Regis
Regis
ter
ter
,
,
Structur
Structur
e,
e,
and the “Clear Way to Develop Inventions Properly”
and the “Clear Way to Develop Inventions Properly”
olli väisälä
olli väisälä
Bach’
Bach’s 15 two-part Inventions are viewed from the Schenkerian perspes 15 two-part Inventions are viewed from the Schenkerian perspective,ctive,focusing on threefocusing on three
main topics:
main topics:(1) the significance of figuration (design) and register as structural determi(1) the significance of figuration (design) and register as structural determinants,nants,
(2) the enlargement of characteristic surface figures,
(2) the enlargement of characteristic surface figures,and (3) the significance of theand (3) the significance of the UrsatzUrsatzfor ac-for
ac-tual musical events.
tual musical events.It is argued that these three topics pertaiIt is argued that these three topics pertain crucially to the musical organizationn crucially to the musical organization
in the Inventions and also
in the Inventions and also offer significant viewpoints for the justification of offer significant viewpoints for the justification of Schenkerian analysisSchenkerian analysis
in Bach research.
in Bach research.
Keywo
Keywords:rds:BachBach,,InvenInventiontions,s,ScheSchenkerinkerian an analyanalysis,sis,figurafiguration,tion,regiregisterster,,enlaenlargemergementsnts
B
B
ach’s
ach’s
15
15
two-part inventions
two-part inventions
belong to the very
belong to the very
best known repertoire of W
best known repertoire of W
estern art music.
estern art music.
Written
Written
for pedag
for pedag
ogical purp
ogical purp
oses,
oses,
they still hol
they still hol
d a standard
d a standard
position in both keyboard and counterpoint pedagogy.
position in both keyboard and counterpoint pedagogy.
They
They
have
have
also
also
frequently
frequently
serve
serve
d
d
as
as
analyti
analyti
cal
cal
examples
examples
of
of
cont
cont
rap
rap
unta
unta
l dev
l dev
ices
ices
,
,
moti
moti
vic d
vic d
evel
evel
opme
opme
nt,
nt,
and f
and f
orm.
orm.
11Several have doubtless also considered their harmony and
Several have doubtless also considered their harmony and
voice
voice
leading,
leading,
but
but
they
they
have
have
not
not
featured
featured
prominently
prominently
in
in
the most significan
the most significan
t Schenkerian lit
t Schenkerian lit
erature.
erature.
The presen
The presen
t
t
study aims to fill in this gap,
study aims to fill in this gap,
suggesting that the Inventions
suggesting that the Inventions
constitute an instructive corpus also for giving a “strong
constitute an instructive corpus also for giving a “strong
foretaste”
foretaste”
of the clar
of the clar
ity and imag
ity and imag
inativenes
inativenes
s of Bac
s of Bac
h’
h’
s
s
voice-lead
voice-lead
ing str
ing str
uctures.
uctures.
Three
Three
general
general
topics,
topics,
each
each
of
of
which
which
has
has
significance
significance
for
for
Bach’
Bach’
s music and
s music and
its analysis,
its analysis,
will be my focus
will be my focus
.
.
The first deals
The first deals
with the role of figuration and
with the role of figuration and
register as structural determi-
register as structural
determi-nants and as
nants and as
analytical criteria.
analytical criteria.
The second topic
The second topic
is Bach’
is Bach’
s
s
tendency to develop characteristic foreground figures by
tendency to develop characteristic foreground figures by
en-larging them as
larging them as
larger structural fram
larger structural fram
eworks.
eworks.
The third ad-
The third
ad-dresses the r
dresses the r
elationship between the
elationship between the
“axiomatic”
“axiomatic”
background
background
of Schen
of Schen
kerian a
kerian a
nalysis
nalysis
,
,
the
the
Urlinie
Urlinie
,
,
and the
and the
actua
actua
l mus
l mus
ical
ical
events.
events.
The first of these top
The first of these top
ics addresses the
ics addresses the
means
means
by which
by which
the composition expresses the multilevel structures that
the composition expresses the multilevel structures that
Schenkerian analysis seeks to el
Schenkerian analysis seeks to el
ucidate.
ucidate.
While each level de-
While each level
de-pends on the fundamental principles of harmony and voice
pends on the fundamental principles of harmony and voice
leading,
leading,
I will b
I will b
e emphasizing
e emphasizing
that the dete
that the dete
rmination of
rmination of
structural weight—which element belongs to which level—
structural weight—which element belongs to which level—
is largely based
is largely based
on quite
on quite
different factors,
different factors,
such as
such as
figuration
figuration
In this paper,
In this paper,I shall allude to Bach’I shall allude to Bach’s preamble to the Inventions ac-s preamble to the Inventions
ac-cording to the translati
cording to the translation of the Wiener Urtext Edition (ed.on of the Wiener Urtext Edition (ed.Erwin Ratz Erwin Ratz
and Karl He
and Karl Heinz Füssl,inz Füssl,trans.trans.unknownunknown):):“A “A sincere sincere guide,guide,in whicin which loversh lovers
of keyboard mu
of keyboard music,sic,and particuand particularly those desirilarly those desiring to learn,ng to learn,are shown aare shown a
clear way not on
clear way not only (1) how to plly (1) how to play faultleay faultlessly in 2 parts,ssly in 2 parts,but also,but also,uponupon
further progress,
further progress,(2) how to treat three obbligato parts correctly and well;(2) how to treat three obbligato parts correctly and well;
and at the same time not only to be inspired with good inventions but to
and at the same time not only to be inspired with good inventions but to
develop them prope
develop them properly;rly;and most of all to achieve a cantabile manneand most of all to achieve a cantabile manner of r of
playing and to gain a strong foretaste of composition.”
playing and to gain a strong foretaste of composition.”
I am indebted to Lauri Suurpää for his valuable comments on a
I am indebted to Lauri Suurpää for his valuable comments on a
draft of this article.
draft of this article.
1
1 See,See,for example,for example,Derr (1981) for dDerr (1981) for discussion on such iscussion on such aspects.aspects.
and register.
and register.
22The
The
second
second
and
and
third
third
topics
topics
identify
identify
two
two
sources for the musical
sources for the musical
contents
contents
of
of
such
such
structures:
structures:
piece-spe-
piece-spe-cific figur
cific figur
es,
es,
on the one hand,
on the one hand,
and the genera
and the genera
l striving for the
l striving for the
Urlinie
Urlinie
descen
descen
t,
t,
on the other.
on the other.
While
While
none
none
of
of
these
these
topics
topics
is
is
by
by
any
any
means
means
original,
original,
a
a
specia
specia
l attent
l attent
ion to them is
ion to them is
,
,
I believ
I believ
e,
e,
highly be
highly be
neficia
neficia
l for
l for
our understanding both of Bach’s musical organization and
our understanding both of Bach’s musical organization and
of the value of Schenkerian analysis in its illumination.
of the value of Schenkerian analysis in its illumination.
While
While
several
several
analysts—Rothgeb
analysts—Rothgeb
(1971)
(1971)
and
and
Oster
Oster
(1961)
(1961)
being classic examples—have pointed out the impacts of
being classic examples—have pointed out the impacts of
fig-uration (or design) and register for structural clarification,
uration (or design) and register for structural clarification,
the significance of these factors seems not always to be fully
the significance of these factors seems not always to be fully
realized in analytical practice (as I have discussed in Väisälä
realized in analytical practice (as I have discussed in Väisälä
2008
2008
).
).
Motiv
Motiv
e enlargem
e enlargem
ents are
ents are
,
,
of course
of course
,
,
a familia
a familia
r topic in
r topic in
the Schenkerian
the Schenkerian
literature
literature
(see,
(see,
for
for
instance,
instance,
Burkhart 19
Burkhart 19
78),
78),
and my contribution in this respect is confined to
and my contribution in this respect is confined to
illuminat-ing its particular significance for the present repertoire.
ing its particular significance for the present repertoire.
while
while
the
the
examples of
examples of
section
section
1 ser
1 ser
ve pri
ve pri
marily
marily
to i
to i
llustrate
llustrate
the structure-determining significance of figuration and
the structure-determining significance of figuration and
register
register
,
,
I will also pay attention to the structures they help
I will also pay attention to the structures they help
to determin
to determin
e,
e,
including th
including th
e backgroun
e backgroun
d level.
d level.
Similar inte
Similar inte
r-
r-twinemen
twinemen
t of topics is evident in all the sections.
t of topics is evident in all the sections.
Figuration
Figuration
and register will retain their significance as analytical
and register will retain their significance as analytical
crite-ria throughout the analyses,
ria throughout the analyses,
including those focus
including those focus
ing on fig-
ing on
fig-ure enlargements (which are not based on the desire to find
ure enlargements (which are not based on the desire to find
such enlargements
such enlargements
).
).
Finally
Finally
,
,
besides illuminatin
besides illuminatin
g Bach’s mu-
g Bach’s
mu-sical language
sical language
,
,
I will suggest that these topics also offer sig-
I will suggest that these topics also offer
sig-nificant arguments for defending the value of the
nificant arguments for defending the value of the
Schenkerian ap
Schenkerian ap
proach in
proach in
Bach r
Bach r
esearch.
esearch.
Such arguments
Such arguments
will be outlined in secti
will be outlined in secti
on 4.
on 4.
abbreviations and analytical symbols
abbreviations and analytical symbols
The article
The article
indentifies each Invention
indentifies each Invention
by key in
by key in
boldface:
boldface:
1
and register.
and register.
22The
The
second
second
and
and
third
third
topics
topics
identify
identify
two
two
sources for the musical
sources for the musical
contents
contents
of
of
such
such
structures:
structures:
piece-spe-
piece-spe-cific figur
cific figur
es,
es,
on the one hand,
on the one hand,
and the genera
and the genera
l striving for the
l striving for the
Urlinie
Urlinie
descen
descen
t,
t,
on the other.
on the other.
While
While
none
none
of
of
these
these
topics
topics
is
is
by
by
any
any
means
means
original,
original,
a
a
specia
specia
l attent
l attent
ion to them is
ion to them is
,
,
I believ
I believ
e,
e,
highly be
highly be
neficia
neficia
l for
l for
our understanding both of Bach’s musical organization and
our understanding both of Bach’s musical organization and
of the value of Schenkerian analysis in its illumination.
of the value of Schenkerian analysis in its illumination.
While
While
several
several
analysts—Rothgeb
analysts—Rothgeb
(1971)
(1971)
and
and
Oster
Oster
(1961)
(1961)
being classic examples—have pointed out the impacts of
being classic examples—have pointed out the impacts of
fig-uration (or design) and register for structural clarification,
uration (or design) and register for structural clarification,
the significance of these factors seems not always to be fully
the significance of these factors seems not always to be fully
realized in analytical practice (as I have discussed in Väisälä
realized in analytical practice (as I have discussed in Väisälä
2008
2008
).
).
Motiv
Motiv
e enlargem
e enlargem
ents are
ents are
,
,
of course
of course
,
,
a familia
a familia
r topic in
r topic in
the Schenkerian
the Schenkerian
literature
literature
(see,
(see,
for
for
instance,
instance,
Burkhart 19
Burkhart 19
78),
78),
and my contribution in this respect is confined to
and my contribution in this respect is confined to
illuminat-ing its particular significance for the present repertoire.
ing its particular significance for the present repertoire.
Finally
Finally
,
,
while Schenkerian
while Schenkerian
analysts are
analysts are
always concerne
always concerne
d
d
with
with
the
the
relationsh
relationsh
ip
ip
between
between
the
the
Urlinie
Urlinie
and the actual
and the actual
music,
music,
the existing literature would
the existing literature would
seem to lack illumination
seem to lack illumination
of this topic based on systematic studies of well-defined but
of this topic based on systematic studies of well-defined but
sufficiently e
sufficiently e
xtensive corpus
xtensive corpus
es of basic re
es of basic re
pertoire.
pertoire.
The 15
The 15
Inventions provide an opportunity for outlining how such a
Inventions provide an opportunity for outlining how such a
study may be conducted.
study may be conducted.
I shall proceed by first discussing selected analytical
I shall proceed by first discussing selected analytical
ex-amples for illuminating the first two topics in sections 1 and
amples for illuminating the first two topics in sections 1 and
2.
2.
In sect
In sect
ion 3,
ion 3,
I shall t
I shall t
ake a mor
ake a mor
e compr
e compr
ehensive
ehensive
look at
look at
the thir
the thir
d topic
d topic
.
.
Howe
Howe
ver
ver
,
,
sinc
sinc
e a single In
e a single In
ven
ven
tion ma
tion ma
y
y
,
,
of
of
course,
course,
pertain to all th
pertain to all th
ree topics
ree topics
,
,
it would be im
it would be im
practical to
practical to
keep the topics stric
keep the topics stric
tly separate in the dis
tly separate in the dis
cussion.
cussion.
Hence,
Hence,
while
while
the
the
examples of
examples of
section
section
1 ser
1 ser
ve pri
ve pri
marily
marily
to i
to i
llustrate
llustrate
the structure-determining significance of figuration and
the structure-determining significance of figuration and
register
register
,
,
I will also pay attention to the structures they help
I will also pay attention to the structures they help
to determin
to determin
e,
e,
including th
including th
e backgroun
e backgroun
d level.
d level.
Similar inte
Similar inte
r-
r-twinemen
twinemen
t of topics is evident in all the sections.
t of topics is evident in all the sections.
Figuration
Figuration
and register will retain their significance as analytical
and register will retain their significance as analytical
crite-ria throughout the analyses,
ria throughout the analyses,
including those focus
including those focus
ing on fig-
ing on
fig-ure enlargements (which are not based on the desire to find
ure enlargements (which are not based on the desire to find
such enlargements
such enlargements
).
).
Finally
Finally
,
,
besides illuminatin
besides illuminatin
g Bach’s mu-
g Bach’s
mu-sical language
sical language
,
,
I will suggest that these topics also offer sig-
I will suggest that these topics also offer
sig-nificant arguments for defending the value of the
nificant arguments for defending the value of the
Schenkerian ap
Schenkerian ap
proach in
proach in
Bach r
Bach r
esearch.
esearch.
Such arguments
Such arguments
will be outlined in secti
will be outlined in secti
on 4.
on 4.
abbreviations and analytical symbols
abbreviations and analytical symbols
The article
The article
indentifies each Invention
indentifies each Invention
by key in
by key in
boldface:
boldface:
major keys are giv
major keys are giv
en in majuscu
en in majuscu
le;
le;
minor in minus
minor in minus
cule.
cule.
The
The
abbreviations are used both in the text and in the analytical
abbreviations are used both in the text and in the analytical
example
example
s.
s.
There are two symbols used for special purposes
There are two symbols used for special purposes
in the analytical examples:
in the analytical examples:
an asterisk denotes voice-
an asterisk denotes voice-
leading
leading
relations
relations
hips clarified by p
hips clarified by p
arallelism
arallelism
of figuration;
of figuration;
and an
and an
accent sign (
accent sign (
>>) denotes special emphasis pertinent for struc-
) denotes special emphasis pertinent for
struc-tural hierarchy.
tural hierarchy.
contrapuntal design and form
contrapuntal design and form
Although
Although
I shall
I shall
concentrate on
concentrate on
the
the
voice-leading struc-
voice-leading
struc-ture rather than
ture rather than
contrapuntal design or
contrapuntal design or
form,
form,
some notions
some notions
concerning the latter two aspects will be necessary for my
concerning the latter two aspects will be necessary for my
discussion.
discussion.
Most Inventions fall
Most Inventions fall
into two basic types with re-
into two basic types with
re-spect to thematic style and the nature of the opening
spect to thematic style and the nature of the opening
imita-tion.
tion.
Inventions of
Inventions of
Type
Type
1 (
1 (
C
C
,
,
D
D
,
,
d
d
,
,
e
e
,
,
G
G
,
,
an
an
d
d
a
a
) open with a
) open with a
statement of a short theme figure in the right hand alone or
statement of a short theme figure in the right hand alone or
accompanied by a simple left-hand gesture to establish the
accompanied by a simple left-hand gesture to establish the
tonic.
tonic.
This statement is f
This statement is f
ollowed b
ollowed b
y imitation in the le
y imitation in the le
ft
ft
hand.
hand.
Inventions of
Inventions of
Type
Type
2 (
2 (
E
E
,
,
E
E
,
,
f
f
,
,
A
A
,
,
B
B
,
,
an
an
d
d
b
b
) open with
) open with
a longer theme comb
a longer theme comb
ined with a countersubjec
ined with a countersubjec
t,
t,
followed by
followed by
2
2 I discuss this in greater length in Väisälä 2008,I discuss this in greater length in Väisälä 2008,in which I identify fourin which I identify four
significant structural determinants that are logically independent of the
significant structural determinants that are logically independent of the
norms of
norms of harmony and harmony and voice-leading:voice-leading: design (including design (including figuration),figuration),
register
register,,metermeter,,and rhetand rhetorical/gestural orical/gestural devices.devices.All these All these factors pfactors pertainertain
to the present analyses,
to the present analyses,even though the greateeven though the greatest explicit attention isst explicit attention is
paid to the first two.
paid to the first two.
bac
bac
h’
h’
s inve
s inve
ntio
ntio
ns:
ns:
figu
figu
ra
ra
tio
tio
n,
n,
reg
reg
iste
iste
r,
r,
str
str
uct
uct
ur
ur
e,
e,
and th
and th
e “
e “
cle
cle
ar w
ar w
ay t
ay t
o dev
o dev
elo
elo
p inv
p inv
ent
ent
ion
ion
s pro
s pro
per
per
ly”
ly”
103
103
another statement with inverted voices.
another statement with inverted voices.
33A special variant of
A special variant of
Typ
Typ
e
e
2
2
is
is
g
g
,
,
in which two counter
in which two counter
subje
subje
cts alter
cts alter
nate in the-
nate in
the-matic statements.
matic statements.
The rem
The rem
aining Inventions,
aining Inventions,
c
c
and
and
F
F
,
,
op
op
en
en
with
with
canons,
canons,
but,
but,
on
on
the
the
basis
basis
of
of
the
the
right-hand
right-hand
material
material
preceding the left-hand entrance,
preceding the left-hand entrance,
F
F
comes closer to Type 1
comes closer to Type 1
and
and
c
c
to T
to T
ype 2 (despite
ype 2 (despite
its one-voice opening).
its one-voice opening).
A
A
central
central
formal
formal
consideration
consideration
concerns
concerns
recapitulation.
recapitulation.
Most Typ
Most Typ
e 1
e 1
Inventions (
Inventions (
C
C
,
,
d
d
,
,
e
e
,
,
an
an
d
d
a
a
) lack an unequivocal
) lack an unequivocal
recapitulation,
recapitulation,
if we defin
if we defin
e this as
e this as
requiring the concurr
requiring the concurr
ent
ent
return of the structural tonic and of the theme at the original
return of the structural tonic and of the theme at the original
level.
level.
Howeve
Howeve
r
r
,
,
d
d
and
and
a
a
contain salient “recapitulation ges-
contain salient “recapitulation
ges-tures,”
tures,”
theme statements at the
theme statements at the
original level but prior to
original level but prior to
the
the
structural tonic return.
structural tonic return.
44Most Type 2 Inventions (
Most Type 2 Inventions (
E
E
,
,
f
f
,
,
A
A
,
,
B
B
,
,
and
and
b
b
),
),
alo
alo
ng w
ng w
ith
ith
G
G
and
and
c
c
,
,
close wit
close wit
h a short une
h a short une
quivo
quivo
cal
cal
recapi
recapi
tulation
tulation
:
:
a tonic return ma
a tonic return ma
rked by a themati
rked by a themati
c state-
c
state-ment or two in the original key.
ment or two in the original key.
55Such statements often in-
Such statements often
in- volve
volve
adaptations
adaptations
with
with
crucial
crucial
structural
structural
significance;
significance;
hence
hence
Each invention subdivides according to thematic and key
Each invention subdivides according to thematic and key
design.
design.
Sections are usually
Sections are usually
(but not always)
(but not always)
concluded by a
concluded by a
cadence and opened by a thematic statement in a key that
cadence and opened by a thematic statement in a key that
differs from that in the beginning of the preceding section.
differs from that in the beginning of the preceding section.
In middleground readings,
In middleground readings,
measure lines are
measure lines are
employed to in-
employed to
in-dicate sectional
dicate sectional
borders.
borders.
Another significant
Another significant
kind of
kind of
formal
formal
entity is the retransition,
entity is the retransition,
by which I mean
by which I mean
any passage l
any passage l
ead-
ead-ing from the last strongly tonicized
ing from the last strongly tonicized
non-tonic scale degree to
non-tonic scale degree to
the tonic return.
the tonic return.
1.
1.
figuration and
figuration and
register as structur
register as structur
al
al
determinants
determinants
a
a
:
:
retransitional v
retransitional v
–
–
prolongation clarified
prolongation clarified
by uniform figura
by uniform figura
tion,
tion,
with a “f
with a “f
ailed”
ailed”
recapitulation gesture as a digression
recapitulation gesture as a digression
and register.
and register.
22The
The
second
second
and
and
third
third
topics
topics
identify
identify
two
two
sources for the musical
sources for the musical
contents
contents
of
of
such
such
structures:
structures:
piece-spe-
piece-spe-cific figur
cific figur
es,
es,
on the one hand,
on the one hand,
and the genera
and the genera
l striving for the
l striving for the
Urlinie
Urlinie
descen
descen
t,
t,
on the other.
on the other.
While
While
none
none
of
of
these
these
topics
topics
is
is
by
by
any
any
means
means
original,
original,
a
a
specia
specia
l attent
l attent
ion to them is
ion to them is
,
,
I believ
I believ
e,
e,
highly be
highly be
neficia
neficia
l for
l for
our understanding both of Bach’s musical organization and
our understanding both of Bach’s musical organization and
of the value of Schenkerian analysis in its illumination.
of the value of Schenkerian analysis in its illumination.
While
While
several
several
analysts—Rothgeb
analysts—Rothgeb
(1971)
(1971)
and
and
Oster
Oster
(1961)
(1961)
being classic examples—have pointed out the impacts of
being classic examples—have pointed out the impacts of
fig-uration (or design) and register for structural clarification,
uration (or design) and register for structural clarification,
the significance of these factors seems not always to be fully
the significance of these factors seems not always to be fully
realized in analytical practice (as I have discussed in Väisälä
realized in analytical practice (as I have discussed in Väisälä
2008
2008
).
).
Motiv
Motiv
e enlargem
e enlargem
ents are
ents are
,
,
of course
of course
,
,
a familia
a familia
r topic in
r topic in
the Schenkerian
the Schenkerian
literature
literature
(see,
(see,
for
for
instance,
instance,
Burkhart 19
Burkhart 19
78),
78),
and my contribution in this respect is confined to
and my contribution in this respect is confined to
illuminat-ing its particular significance for the present repertoire.
ing its particular significance for the present repertoire.
Finally
Finally
,
,
while Schenkerian
while Schenkerian
analysts are
analysts are
always concerne
always concerne
d
d
with
with
the
the
relationsh
relationsh
ip
ip
between
between
the
the
Urlinie
Urlinie
and the actual
and the actual
music,
music,
the existing literature would
the existing literature would
seem to lack illumination
seem to lack illumination
of this topic based on systematic studies of well-defined but
of this topic based on systematic studies of well-defined but
sufficiently e
sufficiently e
xtensive corpus
xtensive corpus
es of basic re
es of basic re
pertoire.
pertoire.
The 15
The 15
Inventions provide an opportunity for outlining how such a
Inventions provide an opportunity for outlining how such a
study may be conducted.
study may be conducted.
I shall proceed by first discussing selected analytical
I shall proceed by first discussing selected analytical
ex-amples for illuminating the first two topics in sections 1 and
amples for illuminating the first two topics in sections 1 and
2.
2.
In sect
In sect
ion 3,
ion 3,
I shall t
I shall t
ake a mor
ake a mor
e compr
e compr
ehensive
ehensive
look at
look at
the thir
the thir
d topic
d topic
.
.
Howe
Howe
ver
ver
,
,
sinc
sinc
e a single In
e a single In
ven
ven
tion ma
tion ma
y
y
,
,
of
of
course,
course,
pertain to all th
pertain to all th
ree topics
ree topics
,
,
it would be im
it would be im
practical to
practical to
keep the topics stric
keep the topics stric
tly separate in the dis
tly separate in the dis
cussion.
cussion.
Hence,
Hence,
while
while
the
the
examples of
examples of
section
section
1 ser
1 ser
ve pri
ve pri
marily
marily
to i
to i
llustrate
llustrate
the structure-determining significance of figuration and
the structure-determining significance of figuration and
register
register
,
,
I will also pay attention to the structures they help
I will also pay attention to the structures they help
to determin
to determin
e,
e,
including th
including th
e backgroun
e backgroun
d level.
d level.
Similar inte
Similar inte
r-
r-twinemen
twinemen
t of topics is evident in all the sections.
t of topics is evident in all the sections.
Figuration
Figuration
and register will retain their significance as analytical
and register will retain their significance as analytical
crite-ria throughout the analyses,
ria throughout the analyses,
including those focus
including those focus
ing on fig-
ing on
fig-ure enlargements (which are not based on the desire to find
ure enlargements (which are not based on the desire to find
such enlargements
such enlargements
).
).
Finally
Finally
,
,
besides illuminatin
besides illuminatin
g Bach’s mu-
g Bach’s
mu-sical language
sical language
,
,
I will suggest that these topics also offer sig-
I will suggest that these topics also offer
sig-nificant arguments for defending the value of the
nificant arguments for defending the value of the
Schenkerian ap
Schenkerian ap
proach in
proach in
Bach r
Bach r
esearch.
esearch.
Such arguments
Such arguments
will be outlined in secti
will be outlined in secti
on 4.
on 4.
abbreviations and analytical symbols
abbreviations and analytical symbols
The article
The article
indentifies each Invention
indentifies each Invention
by key in
by key in
boldface:
boldface:
major keys are giv
major keys are giv
en in majuscu
en in majuscu
le;
le;
minor in minus
minor in minus
cule.
cule.
The
The
abbreviations are used both in the text and in the analytical
abbreviations are used both in the text and in the analytical
example
example
s.
s.
There are two symbols used for special purposes
There are two symbols used for special purposes
in the analytical examples:
in the analytical examples:
an asterisk denotes voice-
an asterisk denotes voice-
leading
leading
relations
relations
hips clarified by p
hips clarified by p
arallelism
arallelism
of figuration;
of figuration;
and an
and an
accent sign (
accent sign (
>>) denotes special emphasis pertinent for struc-
) denotes special emphasis pertinent for
struc-tural hierarchy.
tural hierarchy.
contrapuntal design and form
contrapuntal design and form
Although
Although
I shall
I shall
concentrate on
concentrate on
the
the
voice-leading struc-
voice-leading
struc-ture rather than
ture rather than
contrapuntal design or
contrapuntal design or
form,
form,
some notions
some notions
concerning the latter two aspects will be necessary for my
concerning the latter two aspects will be necessary for my
discussion.
discussion.
Most Inventions fall
Most Inventions fall
into two basic types with re-
into two basic types with
re-spect to thematic style and the nature of the opening
spect to thematic style and the nature of the opening
imita-tion.
tion.
Inventions of
Inventions of
Type
Type
1 (
1 (
C
C
,
,
D
D
,
,
d
d
,
,
e
e
,
,
G
G
,
,
an
an
d
d
a
a
) open with a
) open with a
statement of a short theme figure in the right hand alone or
statement of a short theme figure in the right hand alone or
accompanied by a simple left-hand gesture to establish the
accompanied by a simple left-hand gesture to establish the
tonic.
tonic.
This statement is f
This statement is f
ollowed b
ollowed b
y imitation in the le
y imitation in the le
ft
ft
hand.
hand.
Inventions of
Inventions of
Type
Type
2 (
2 (
E
E
,
,
E
E
,
,
f
f
,
,
A
A
,
,
B
B
,
,
an
an
d
d
b
b
) open with
) open with
a longer theme comb
a longer theme comb
ined with a countersubjec
ined with a countersubjec
t,
t,
followed by
followed by
1
1
0
0
2
2
m
m
u
u
s
s
i
i
c
c
t
t
h
h
e
e
o
o
r
r
y
y
s
s
p
p
e
e
c
c
t
t
r
r
u
u
m
m
3
3
1
1
(
(
2009
2009
)
)
2
2 I discuss this in greater length in Väisälä 2008,I discuss this in greater length in Väisälä 2008,in which I identify fourin which I identify four
significant structural determinants that are logically independent of the
significant structural determinants that are logically independent of the
norms of
norms of harmony and harmony and voice-leading:voice-leading: design (including design (including figuration),figuration),
register
register,,metermeter,,and rhetand rhetorical/gestural orical/gestural devices.devices.All these All these factors pfactors pertainertain
to the present analyses,
to the present analyses,even though the greateeven though the greatest explicit attention isst explicit attention is
paid to the first two.
paid to the first two.