Ped kiirics
VOLUME 45 MARCH 1970 NUMBER 3, PART I
COMMENTARY
VITAMIN
D DEPENDENCY
A
CONDITION still quite unfamiliar to manyphysicians is discussed in this is-sue of PEDIATRICS.1 The disease, called
“Vi-tamin-D-dependent rickets” in the
accom-panying article, was first segregated from
the array of “Vitamin-D-resistant rickets”
by Fraser and Salter2 (Type III, A, ii, in
their classification), and by Prader and col-leagues (hereditary
pseudo-vitamin-D-de-ficiency rickets, in their terminology). The condition is characterized by signs and symptoms which appear in the first year of life, and which are easily mistaken for those
of severe (Stage III) vitamin D deficiency.
As revealed in typical case reports of the
condition,3’5 manifestations include muscu-lar weakness, convulsions, severe rickets,
growth
failure, hypophosphatemia, low ornormal
total
serum
calcium,
mild renal tu-bular acidosis, and hyperaminoaciduria.Vi-tamin D dependency responds dramatically to vitamin D2 when given in the appropri-ate daily dose, which is about 100 times the
normal requirement. A persistent need for
this large amount of the vitamin has been
observed throughout childhood, and it may
persist for the patient’s life-time; it is this
feature which invokes the term
“depen-dency.”
The incidence of vitamin D dependency,
which is inherited as a simple autosomal re-cessive trait,5’6 is higher than once suspected,
and two groups working in Toronto and
Montreal each now have half a dozen
pa-tients under their care.6 Therefore, it is all
the more important that vitamin D
depen-dency be distinguished from advanced
vi-tamin D deficiency, an acquired condition which is still all too common.4 This can be
done most easily when the family history
reveals other affected siblings with persis-tent rickets, and when there is a history of normal vitamin D intake in infancy (i.e.,
about 400 I.U. daily) prior to the onset of
symptoms. In both conditions there is evi-dence for secondary hyperparathyroidism
with attendant changes in bone and renal
tubular function,’’ which serves to
dis-tinguish them from other forms of
hypo-phosphatemic rickets caused by primary
disorders of phosphate transport in the renal tubule. What then is common to the defi-ciency and dependency states, and yet why are they different; and what is the signifi-cance of the current paper in PEDIATRIcs?
The understanding of these two
condi-tions, and of other forms of vitamin D
re-sponsive rickets, lies in new information on
the metabolism and action of vitamin D.511
The lipid-soluble substances, known to most
physicians as vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol)
and vitamin Dt (cholecalciferol) are formed
from provitamins by the opening of ring B
under the influence of ultraviolet radiation.
The vitamin is then bound to globulin and
carried in plasma to the liver where it tinder-goes hydroxylation, to form the
correspond-ing polar 25-hydroxy derivatives (25-HEC
and 25-HCC), which are the forms of the
vitamin destined to carry out its biological
362
VITAMIN D DEPENDENCYfunctions. After hepatic synthesis of its
ac-tive form, the vitamin is again transported in plasma by 2 globulin, until it is bound to the
nuclear
membrane of intestinal epithelial cells. Thereafter, by mechanisms stillrequir-ing elucidation, it initiates synthesis of a
specific
messenger
RNA, by activating a por-lion of nuclear DNA(
gene or genes)
. Them-RNA in its turn initiates synthesis of a
cytoplasmic protein
(
or proteins)
whosemajor site of action is in the brush border of intestinal epithelial cells. This
protein
whichhas been isolated and some of its properties
characterized from chick intestinal
mu-cosa,12 mediates calcium transport from the
brush border to the antiluminal border,
and hence to the blood. The vitamin also
stimulates a calcium-dependent ATPase in
brush border which is important in
aug-menting initial rates of calcium uptake.9 The
25-hydroxy
derivative of vitamin D has a third important effect. It can act directly onbone
in physiological
doses
to release
cal-cium
and phosphate ions;13 this action isvery
similar
to that of parathyroid
hormone
and it is inhibited by calcitonin.It should be remembered when
interpret-ing the clinical manifestations of the
de-ficiency and dependency states, that
para-thyroid
hormone
can
stimulate
intestinal
transport of calcium and mobilize calcium from bone only in the presence of vitaminD.14 On the other hand, vitamin D, in any
form, is not necessary for the inhibitory ef-fect of parathyroid hormone on renal
tubu-lar conservation of phosphate and amino
acids.4’7’5 These complicated relationships
between vitamin and hormone action on
cal-cium metabolism have one important
objec-tive, namely, to maintain the extracellular
concentration of calcium ion within the
nar-row range wherein it modulates membrane
activity in many tissues of the body
includ-parathyroid response in an attempt to
main-tam calcium levels in body fluids even at
the expense of bone mineralization and of
renal tubular function. Any impairment in
the conversion of vitamin D to the
biologi-cally important 25-hydroxy derivative, or
any inhibition of its binding to the nuclear
membrane
will have an effect on calcium nutrition similar to that of dietary deficiencyof
the vitamin.At the present time, it is useful to consider
vitamin D dependency as a Mendelian trait
affecting the endogenous metabolism of
vita-mm. D. This hypothesis can now be tested.
The paper by the Toronto group1 tells us
that
invitamin
D dependency there is a spe-cific intestinal transport defect affectingcal-cium ion alone. Whereas this might be
con-sidered another “inborn error of membrane
transport,” we are now in a position to con-sider the trait as a potential inborn error of vitamin D metabolism. Two
clinical
features
of the trait inform us further on the
possi-bilities for productive research on this di-sease in the future. First, when sufficient
vitamin D1 or D3 is given to
vitamin-D-dependent patients, an immediate regression of the fully expressed phenotype occurs; this indicates that normal calcium transport pro-tein( s) can be synthesized endogenously
under suitable conditions. Secondly, the
vitamin D requirement is permanently 100
times greater than normal. This suggests
that vitamin D dependency is either a
“leaky” mutant in which high concentrations of vitamin precursor are necessary to initiate
synthesis of a small amount of the
25-hydroxy derivative; or the trait represents a
change in Km of the binding site for
25-hydroxy
derivative on the nuclearmem-brane which high concentrations of the
25-hydroxy derivative can offset.
formation on the treatable hereditary
vita-min dependencies of man,’6’17 and to
pre-scribe for such patients effectively and
rationally.
CHARLES R. SciuvER, M.D.
The deBelle Laboratory for
Biochemical Genetics The McGill University-Montreal
Children’s Hospital Research
Institute
2300 Tupper Street
Montreal 25, Quebec
REFERENCES
1. Hamilton,
J.
R., Harrison,J.,
Fraser, D., Radde, I., Morecki, R., and Paunier, L.: The small intestine in vitamin D dependent rickets. PEDIATRICS, 45:364, 1970.2. Fraser, D., and Salter, R. B.: The diagnosis and management of the various types of rickets. Pediat. Clin. N. Amer., 417, May, 1958. 3. Prader, Von A., hug, R., and Heierli, E.: Eine
besondere form der prim#{228}ren vitamin-D re-sistenten rachitis mit hypocalcamie und au-tosomal-dominantem erbgang: die heredi-tare pseudo-mangelrachitis. Helv. Paediat. Acta, 16:452, 1961.
4. Fraser, D., Kooh, S. W., and Scriver, C. R.: Hyperparathyroidism as the cause of
hy-peraminoaciduria and phosphaturia in human
vitamin D deficiency. Pediat. Res., 1:425,
1967.
5. Stoop,
J.
W., Schraagen, M. J. C., and Tiddens, H. A. W. M.: Pseudo vitamin D deficiencyrickets. Acta Paediat. Scand., 56:607, 1967. 6. Fraser, D., and Scriver, C. H.: Unpublished
ob-servations.
7. Crose,
J.,
and Scriver, C. H.: Parathyroid de-pendent phosphaturia and aminoaciduria in the vitamin D deficient rat. Amer. J. Physiol.,214:370, 1968.
8. Norman, A. \V.: The mode of action of vitamin D. Biol. Rev., 43:97, 1968.
9. DeLuca, H. F.: Recent advances in the me-tabolism and function of vitamin D. Fed. Proc., 28:1678, 1969.
10. DeLuca, H. F.: Current concepts: Vitamin D. New Eng. J. Med., 281:1103, 1969.
11. Kimberg, D. V.: Effects of vitamin D and
steroid hormones on the active transport of
calcium by the intestine. New Eng.
J.
Med., 280: 1396, 1969.12. Wasserman, R. H.: Calcium transport by the intestine: A model and comment on vitamin D action. CaIc. Tiss. Res., 2:301, 1968. 13. Trummel, C. L., Raisz, L. C., Blunt,
J.
W., andDeLuca, H. F.: 25-hydroxycholecalciferol: Stimulation of bone resorption in tissue cul-tare. Science, 163:1450, 1969.
14. Rasmussen, H., and DeLuca, H. F.: Calcium homeostasis. Ergehn. Physiol., 53:108, 1963. 15. Amaud, C., Rasmussen, H., and Anast, C.:
Further studies on the interrelationship be-tween parathyroid hormone and vitamin D.
J. Clin. Invest., 45:1955, 1966.
16. Rosenberg, L. E.: Inherited amino acidopathies demonstrating vitamin dependencies. New Eng. J. Med., 281:146, 1969.