• No results found

BBA FN415 (18) Lect 06 VaR.pptx

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "BBA FN415 (18) Lect 06 VaR.pptx"

Copied!
33
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Introduction to Market Risk Measurement – Value at Risk

Introduction to Market Risk Measurement – Value at Risk

In

tr

od

u

ct

io

n

to

M

ar

ke

t R

is

k

M

ea

su

re

m

e

nt

(2)

1. Overview

Market risk is primarily measured with

value at risk (VaR)

VaR measures the total portfolio risk.

In theory the whole distribution of profit

and loss should be described by the risk managers but in reality using VaR is much more practical.

VaR is summarises the whole distribution

into one number

(3)

1.1 Types of Financial Market Risks

Includes Market Risk, Credit Risk, and Operational

Risk.

Market Risk: Risk of losses due to the movements

in financial market prices or volatilities.

Credit Risk: Risk of losses due to the fact that the

counterparty may be unwilling or unable to fulfil their contractual obligations.

Operational Risk: Risk of loss resulting from failed

or inadequate internal processes, systems and people, or from external events.

Oftentimes, these three categories interact with

(4)

1.1 Example of risk interactions

Suppose trader purchases 1 million worth of GBP

spot from Bank A for settlement in two business days.

The current rate is $1.5 : £1

This simple transaction involves a series of risks

Market RiskCredit Risk

(5)

1.2 Risk Management Tools

In the past, risks were measured with

notional amounts, sensitivity measures and scenario analysis.

Some intuition provided but it failed to

capture the downside risk of the total portfolio.

They failed to capture

Differences in volatilities across marketsCorrelations between risk factors

(6)

1.2 Risk Management Tools; Example

Consider a five year inverse floater, which pays

coupons 16%-2xLIBOR, if positive.

 Notional Principal of $100 million

 Initial market value of note is $100 million

Extremely sensitive to movement in the interest ratesQuestion is how much could the investor lose on this

investment over a specified horizon?

Notional only provides an indication of the potential

loss.

(7)

1.2 Risk Management Tools; Example (ii)

A sensitivity measure such as duration is more helpful

Suppose that this bond has the modified duration of 13.5

years.

This sensitivity measures reveals the extreme sensitivity

of the bond to interest rates movement but it doesn’t tell us anything about the probability of occurrence.

Scenario analysis can help but it still doesn’t associate the

loss with a probability.

The great beauty about VaR is that it provides a neat

answer to all these questions.

VaR gives one number which aggregates the risks across

(8)

1.2 Risk Management Tools; Example (iii)

If the worst increase in yield at the 95% level is 1.65%, we can

compute the VaR as

VaR = Market Value x Modified Duration x Worst Yield Increase.

 This gives VaR = $100million X 13.5 X 0.0165 = $22 million

The investor can now make the following statement:

(9)

1.2 Risk Management Tools; VaR Revolution

This started in 1993 when the Group of Thirty (G30) endorsed VaR as part of best practices for dealing with derivatives.

However, the methodology behind VaR is not new

It came from the merging of financial theory, which focuses on the pricing of financial

instruments, and statistics, which studies the behaviour of risk factors.

The idea of VaR can be traced back to the

(10)

2.1 VaR: Definition

Value at Risk is a summary measure

of downside risk expressed in dollars,

or in the reference currency.

A general definition is

“VaR is the maximum loss over a

target horizon such that there is a

(11)

2.1 VaR: Example (i)

Consider for instance a position of $4

billion short the Yen, Long the dollar.

This position corresponds to a

well-known hedge fund that took a bet

that the yen would fall in value

against the dollar.

How much could this position lose

(12)

2.1 VaR: Example (ii)

To answer this question, we could use historical

data

The simulated daily return in dollars in then

Rt($) = Q0($) [St-St-1]/St-1

where Q0 is the current dollar value of the position and S is the spot rate in Yen per dollar measured over two consecutive days.

 So if S1=112.0 and S2=111.8. The simulated return is

(13)

2.1 VaR: Example (iii)

Repeat this operation over the whole sample

(14)

2.1 VaR: Example (iv)

Next we construct a frequency distribution of daily

returns.

This is ordered from the worst return to the best

(15)

2.1 VaR: Example (v)

Now we wish to summarize the

distribution by one number.

We could describe the quantile, the level of

loss that will not be exceeded at some high confidence level.

Select for instance the confidence level as c

= 95% which correspond to the right tail probability.

VaR is defined in terms of the left tail

(16)

2.1 VaR: Example (vi)

Now we wish to summarize the

distribution by one number.

We could describe the quantile, the level of

loss that will not be exceeded at some high confidence level.

Select for instance the confidence level as c

= 95% which correspond to the right tail probability.

VaR is defined in terms of the left tail

(17)

2.1 VaR: Example (vii)

We want to find the cutoff value R* such

that the probability of loss worse than - R*

is p = 1 – c = 5%

With a total of T = 2,527 observations, this

corresponds to a total of pT = 0.05*2527 = 126.

We pick from the ordered distribution the

cutoff value, which is R*=$47.1 million.

Now we can make the following VaR

(18)

2.1 VaR: Example (viii)

The maximum loss over one day is about

$47 million at the 95% confidence level.

Note that this describes risk in a way that

notional amounts or exposures cannot convey.

We can also calculate the number of

expected exceedences n over a period of N days:

(19)

2.2 VaR: Caveats

VaR does not describe the

worst loss.

VaR does not describe the

losses in the left tail.

VaR is measured with some

(20)

2.3 Alternative Measures of Risk

The Entire distribution

The Conditional VaR

The Standard Deviation

The Semi-standard Deviation

(21)

The Entire Distribution

In our example VAR is simply one

quantile in the distribution.

The risk manager however has access

to the whole distribution and could

report a range of VAR numbers for

increasing confidence levels

The entire distribution will describe

(22)

Conditional VaR

 A related concept is the expected value of the loss when it exceeds VaR.

This measures the average of the loss conditional

on the fact that it is greater than VAR.

 Formally the conditional VAR (CVAR) is the negative of

 This ratio is also called expected shortfall, tail conditional expectation, conditional loss, or expected tail loss.

(23)

This is similar to the standard deviation but

consider only data points that represent a loss.

Advantage: it takes into account the

(24)

Drawdown

Drawdown is the decline from peak over a fixed

time interval.

Define xMAX as the local maximum over this period

t of [0, T], which occurs at time tMAX of [0, T]

Relative to this value, the drawdown at time t is

The maximum drawdown is the largest such value

(25)
(26)

Maximum Drawdown 1 8 /0 8 /1 99 5 1 3 /1 1/ 1 9 9 5 0 9 /0 2 /1 99 6 1 4 /0 5 /1 99 6 1 3 /0 8 /1 99 6 0 6 /1 1/ 1 9 9 6 0 4 /0 2 /1 9 9 7 0 7 /0 5/ 1 9 9 7 0 4 /0 8 /1 99 7 2 9 /1 0/ 1 9 9 7 2 7 /0 1 /1 9 9 8 2 8 /0 4/ 1 9 9 8 2 8 /0 7 /1 9 9 8 2 1 /1 0 /1 9 9 8 2 0 /0 1 /1 9 9 9 2 1 /0 4/ 1 9 9 9 2 0 /0 7 /1 9 9 9 1 4 /1 0 /1 9 9 9 1 3 /0 1 /2 00 0 1 0 /0 4 /2 0 0 0 1 0 /0 7 /2 0 0 0 0 4 /1 0 /2 0 0 0 0 3 /0 1 /2 00 1 2 9 /0 3 /2 0 0 1 2 9 /0 6 /2 00 1 2 6 /0 9 /2 00 1 2 4 /1 2 /2 00 1 2 1 /0 3 /2 00 2 2 1 /0 6 /2 00 2 1 8 /0 9 /2 00 2 1 6 /1 2 /2 00 2 1 4 /0 3/ 2 0 0 3 1 6 /0 6 /2 00 3 1 1 /0 9 /2 00 3 0 8 /1 2 /2 00 3 0 4 /0 3/ 2 0 0 4 0 8 /0 6 /2 00 4 0 3 /0 9/ 2 0 0 4 2 9 /1 1/ 2 0 0 4 2 8 /0 2/ 2 0 0 5 0 1 /0 6 /2 0 0 5 2 9 /0 8/ 2 0 0 5 2 2 /1 1 /2 0 0 5 2 0 /0 2 /2 0 0 6 2 4 /0 5 /2 0 0 6 2 2 /0 8/ 2 0 0 6 1 6 /1 1 /2 0 0 6 1 4 /0 2 /2 0 0 7 1 7 /0 5 /2 00 7 1 4 /0 8 /2 0 0 7 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

SET50 Max. Down

521.71

238.80

-54.23%

433.69

136.97

Maximum Down = -68.42% Avg. Down = -33.29%

-68.42%

(27)

3. VaR Parameters

To measure VAR, we first

need to define two

quantitative parameters the

confidence level and the

(28)

3.1 VaR Parameters; Confidence Level

The higher the confidence level c, the greater

the VAR measure.

Extreme losses. It is not clear, however,

whether one should stop at 99%, 99.9%, 99.99% and so on. Each of these values will create an increasingly larger loss, but with less likelihood.

Another problem is that as c increases the

(29)

3.2 VaR Parameters; Horizon

The longer the horizon T, the greater the VAR

measure

To extrapolate from a one-day horizon to a longer

horizon, we need to assume that returns are

independent and identically distributed. If so, the daily volatility can be transformed into to a

multiple day volatility by multiplication by the square root of time.

We also need to assume that the distribution of

(30)

5. Stress Testing

 VaR does not purport to account for extreme

losses. This is why VAR should be complemented by stress-testing.

Stress testing is a key risk management process

which includes

(1) scenario analysis

(2) stressing models, volatilities, and correlations(3) developing policy response

 Scenario Analysis

Moving key variables one at a timeUsing historical scenario

(31)

6. Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is usually viewed as

a component of market risk.

Lack of liquidity can cause the

failure of an institution even

when it is technically liquid.

Liquidity risk can be separated

into

Asset Liquidity risk

(32)

Desirable Properties of Risk Measures r  Monotonicity:

Translation invariance:

Homogeneity:

(33)

Weekly Brainteaser: First correct answer email get’s ½% added to their final score.

Suppose that I want to find the average

number of times BBA students cheat during quizzes during your academic career.

You want to participate but don’t want to

reveal your number to me or to your friends directly.

Without the use of computers or

References

Related documents

Statistically, students that did receive teaching in AI were more likely to consider radiology ( p = 0.01) and rated more positively to the questions relating to the

The serum level of MDA was done at admission, 42.9% of the studied ischemic stroke patients had MDA level more than 2.65 nmol/L compared to 57.1% had MDA level less than 2.65

In particular, squeezing effects and nonclassical properties of a superposition state composed of two displaced squeezed number states of equal amplitude, but 180° out of phase,

HCS: Healthy control subjects; MDS: Movement disorder society; MM: Motor manifestations; NMM: Nonmotor manifestations; OBV: Olfactory bulb volumetry; OD: Olfactory dysfunction;

Even though the colon was the focus of inflammatory reaction, we did not observe any changes in the mitochondrial function in the colon tissue compared to healthy con- trols or to

In dye analysis, protosappanin B and brazilin as well as brazilein were identified, which implied that sappanwood was used for the organic manufacture of pigments.. In addition,

In our research, we found that a binomial logistic re- gression to ascertain the effects of presence of SVDs on MRI, presence of hypertension, BMI (kg/m2), serum TC (mg/dl),

In this study, we evaluated sCD127 release and corresponding transcripts IL7R3 and IL7R7 expressions in purified T cells from septic shock patients.. After approval by local