Introduction to Market Risk Measurement – Value at Risk
Introduction to Market Risk Measurement – Value at Risk
In
tr
od
u
ct
io
n
to
M
ar
ke
t R
is
k
M
ea
su
re
m
e
nt
1. Overview
Market risk is primarily measured with
value at risk (VaR)
VaR measures the total portfolio risk.
In theory the whole distribution of profit
and loss should be described by the risk managers but in reality using VaR is much more practical.
VaR is summarises the whole distribution
into one number
1.1 Types of Financial Market Risks
Includes Market Risk, Credit Risk, and Operational
Risk.
Market Risk: Risk of losses due to the movements
in financial market prices or volatilities.
Credit Risk: Risk of losses due to the fact that the
counterparty may be unwilling or unable to fulfil their contractual obligations.
Operational Risk: Risk of loss resulting from failed
or inadequate internal processes, systems and people, or from external events.
Oftentimes, these three categories interact with
1.1 Example of risk interactions
Suppose trader purchases 1 million worth of GBP
spot from Bank A for settlement in two business days.
The current rate is $1.5 : £1
This simple transaction involves a series of risks
– Market Risk – Credit Risk
1.2 Risk Management Tools
In the past, risks were measured with
notional amounts, sensitivity measures and scenario analysis.
Some intuition provided but it failed to
capture the downside risk of the total portfolio.
They failed to capture
– Differences in volatilities across markets – Correlations between risk factors
1.2 Risk Management Tools; Example
Consider a five year inverse floater, which pays
coupons 16%-2xLIBOR, if positive.
Notional Principal of $100 million
Initial market value of note is $100 million
Extremely sensitive to movement in the interest rates Question is how much could the investor lose on this
investment over a specified horizon?
Notional only provides an indication of the potential
loss.
1.2 Risk Management Tools; Example (ii)
A sensitivity measure such as duration is more helpful
Suppose that this bond has the modified duration of 13.5
years.
This sensitivity measures reveals the extreme sensitivity
of the bond to interest rates movement but it doesn’t tell us anything about the probability of occurrence.
Scenario analysis can help but it still doesn’t associate the
loss with a probability.
The great beauty about VaR is that it provides a neat
answer to all these questions.
VaR gives one number which aggregates the risks across
1.2 Risk Management Tools; Example (iii)
If the worst increase in yield at the 95% level is 1.65%, we can
compute the VaR as
VaR = Market Value x Modified Duration x Worst Yield Increase.
This gives VaR = $100million X 13.5 X 0.0165 = $22 million
The investor can now make the following statement:
1.2 Risk Management Tools; VaR Revolution
This started in 1993 when the Group of Thirty (G30) endorsed VaR as part of best practices for dealing with derivatives.
However, the methodology behind VaR is not new
It came from the merging of financial theory, which focuses on the pricing of financial
instruments, and statistics, which studies the behaviour of risk factors.
The idea of VaR can be traced back to the
2.1 VaR: Definition
Value at Risk is a summary measure
of downside risk expressed in dollars,
or in the reference currency.
A general definition is
“VaR is the maximum loss over a
target horizon such that there is a
2.1 VaR: Example (i)
Consider for instance a position of $4
billion short the Yen, Long the dollar.
This position corresponds to a
well-known hedge fund that took a bet
that the yen would fall in value
against the dollar.
How much could this position lose
2.1 VaR: Example (ii)
To answer this question, we could use historical
data
The simulated daily return in dollars in then
Rt($) = Q0($) [St-St-1]/St-1
where Q0 is the current dollar value of the position and S is the spot rate in Yen per dollar measured over two consecutive days.
So if S1=112.0 and S2=111.8. The simulated return is
2.1 VaR: Example (iii)
Repeat this operation over the whole sample
2.1 VaR: Example (iv)
Next we construct a frequency distribution of daily
returns.
This is ordered from the worst return to the best
2.1 VaR: Example (v)
Now we wish to summarize the
distribution by one number.
We could describe the quantile, the level of
loss that will not be exceeded at some high confidence level.
Select for instance the confidence level as c
= 95% which correspond to the right tail probability.
VaR is defined in terms of the left tail
2.1 VaR: Example (vi)
Now we wish to summarize the
distribution by one number.
We could describe the quantile, the level of
loss that will not be exceeded at some high confidence level.
Select for instance the confidence level as c
= 95% which correspond to the right tail probability.
VaR is defined in terms of the left tail
2.1 VaR: Example (vii)
We want to find the cutoff value R* such
that the probability of loss worse than - R*
is p = 1 – c = 5%
With a total of T = 2,527 observations, this
corresponds to a total of pT = 0.05*2527 = 126.
We pick from the ordered distribution the
cutoff value, which is R*=$47.1 million.
Now we can make the following VaR
2.1 VaR: Example (viii)
The maximum loss over one day is about
$47 million at the 95% confidence level.
Note that this describes risk in a way that
notional amounts or exposures cannot convey.
We can also calculate the number of
expected exceedences n over a period of N days:
2.2 VaR: Caveats
VaR does not describe the
worst loss.
VaR does not describe the
losses in the left tail.
VaR is measured with some
2.3 Alternative Measures of Risk
The Entire distribution
The Conditional VaR
The Standard Deviation
The Semi-standard Deviation
The Entire Distribution
In our example VAR is simply one
quantile in the distribution.
The risk manager however has access
to the whole distribution and could
report a range of VAR numbers for
increasing confidence levels
The entire distribution will describe
Conditional VaR
A related concept is the expected value of the loss when it exceeds VaR.
This measures the average of the loss conditional
on the fact that it is greater than VAR.
Formally the conditional VAR (CVAR) is the negative of
This ratio is also called expected shortfall, tail conditional expectation, conditional loss, or expected tail loss.
This is similar to the standard deviation but
consider only data points that represent a loss.
Advantage: it takes into account the
Drawdown
Drawdown is the decline from peak over a fixed
time interval.
Define xMAX as the local maximum over this period
t of [0, T], which occurs at time tMAX of [0, T]
Relative to this value, the drawdown at time t is
The maximum drawdown is the largest such value
Maximum Drawdown 1 8 /0 8 /1 99 5 1 3 /1 1/ 1 9 9 5 0 9 /0 2 /1 99 6 1 4 /0 5 /1 99 6 1 3 /0 8 /1 99 6 0 6 /1 1/ 1 9 9 6 0 4 /0 2 /1 9 9 7 0 7 /0 5/ 1 9 9 7 0 4 /0 8 /1 99 7 2 9 /1 0/ 1 9 9 7 2 7 /0 1 /1 9 9 8 2 8 /0 4/ 1 9 9 8 2 8 /0 7 /1 9 9 8 2 1 /1 0 /1 9 9 8 2 0 /0 1 /1 9 9 9 2 1 /0 4/ 1 9 9 9 2 0 /0 7 /1 9 9 9 1 4 /1 0 /1 9 9 9 1 3 /0 1 /2 00 0 1 0 /0 4 /2 0 0 0 1 0 /0 7 /2 0 0 0 0 4 /1 0 /2 0 0 0 0 3 /0 1 /2 00 1 2 9 /0 3 /2 0 0 1 2 9 /0 6 /2 00 1 2 6 /0 9 /2 00 1 2 4 /1 2 /2 00 1 2 1 /0 3 /2 00 2 2 1 /0 6 /2 00 2 1 8 /0 9 /2 00 2 1 6 /1 2 /2 00 2 1 4 /0 3/ 2 0 0 3 1 6 /0 6 /2 00 3 1 1 /0 9 /2 00 3 0 8 /1 2 /2 00 3 0 4 /0 3/ 2 0 0 4 0 8 /0 6 /2 00 4 0 3 /0 9/ 2 0 0 4 2 9 /1 1/ 2 0 0 4 2 8 /0 2/ 2 0 0 5 0 1 /0 6 /2 0 0 5 2 9 /0 8/ 2 0 0 5 2 2 /1 1 /2 0 0 5 2 0 /0 2 /2 0 0 6 2 4 /0 5 /2 0 0 6 2 2 /0 8/ 2 0 0 6 1 6 /1 1 /2 0 0 6 1 4 /0 2 /2 0 0 7 1 7 /0 5 /2 00 7 1 4 /0 8 /2 0 0 7 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
SET50 Max. Down
521.71
238.80
-54.23%
433.69
136.97
Maximum Down = -68.42% Avg. Down = -33.29%
-68.42%
3. VaR Parameters
To measure VAR, we first
need to define two
quantitative parameters the
confidence level and the
3.1 VaR Parameters; Confidence Level
The higher the confidence level c, the greater
the VAR measure.
Extreme losses. It is not clear, however,
whether one should stop at 99%, 99.9%, 99.99% and so on. Each of these values will create an increasingly larger loss, but with less likelihood.
Another problem is that as c increases the
3.2 VaR Parameters; Horizon
The longer the horizon T, the greater the VAR
measure
To extrapolate from a one-day horizon to a longer
horizon, we need to assume that returns are
independent and identically distributed. If so, the daily volatility can be transformed into to a
multiple day volatility by multiplication by the square root of time.
We also need to assume that the distribution of
5. Stress Testing
VaR does not purport to account for extreme
losses. This is why VAR should be complemented by stress-testing.
Stress testing is a key risk management process
which includes
– (1) scenario analysis
– (2) stressing models, volatilities, and correlations – (3) developing policy response
Scenario Analysis
– Moving key variables one at a time – Using historical scenario
6. Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is usually viewed as
a component of market risk.
Lack of liquidity can cause the
failure of an institution even
when it is technically liquid.
Liquidity risk can be separated
into
–
Asset Liquidity risk
Desirable Properties of Risk Measures r Monotonicity:
Translation invariance:
Homogeneity:
Weekly Brainteaser: First correct answer email get’s ½% added to their final score.
Suppose that I want to find the average
number of times BBA students cheat during quizzes during your academic career.
You want to participate but don’t want to
reveal your number to me or to your friends directly.
Without the use of computers or