• No results found

John Naimo, Steven NyBlom and John Krattli

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "John Naimo, Steven NyBlom and John Krattli"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

HOA.736153.1

STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS

FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING

OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CLAIMS BOARD

HELD IN ROOM 648 OF THE KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION,

500 WEST TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012

ON

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2010, AT 1:00 PM

Present:

John Naimo, Steven NyBlom and John Krattli

The following items were presented to the Claims Board for consideration

and the Claims Board took actions as indicated in bold.

1.

Call to Order.

2.

Opportunity for members of the public to address the Claims Board on

items of interest within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Claims Board.

No members of the public addressed the Claims Board.

3.

Closed Session – Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation

(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9).

a.

Savanah Kirifi v. County of Los Angeles, et al. (consolidated with

Elias Aldana, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.)

Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2009 00120599

(Consolidated with Los Angeles Superior Court Case

No. BC 409 969)

This lawsuit arises from injuries sustained in a vehicle accident

involving an employee of the Sheriff's Department.

Action Taken:

The Claims Board approved settlement of this matter in the

amount of $50,000.

Absent: None

Vote:

Unanimously carried

(2)

HOA.736153.1

2

b.

Bryan David Moore, et al. v. County of Los Angeles

Compton Superior Court Case No. TC 022 412

This wrongful death lawsuit concerns allegations of excessive force

by Sheriff's Deputies.

Action Taken:

The Claims Board recommended to the Board of Supervisors

the settlement of this matter in the amount of $350,000 and

that the Auditor-Controller be instructed to draw a warrant to

implement this settlement from the Sheriff's Department's

budget.

Absent: None

Vote:

Unanimously carried

See Supporting Documents

c.

Dolly Leong v. County of Los Angeles

Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 412 381

This lawsuit concerns allegations that an employee of the

Department of Public Social Services was subjected to sexual

harassment and retaliation.

Action Taken:

The Claims Board approved settlement of this matter in the

amount of $50,000.

Absent: None

Vote:

Ayes

: 2 - J

ohn Naimo and John Krattli

Noes

:

1 -

Steven NyBlom

4.

Report of actions taken in Closed Session.

The Claims Board reconvened in open session and reported the

actions taken in closed session as indicated under Agenda

Item No. 3 above.

(3)

CASE SUMMARY

INFORMATION ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION

CASE NAME

Savanah Kirifi v. County of Los

Angeles, et al.

CASE NUMBER

Case No. 30-200900120599

COURT

Orange Superior Court

DATE FILED

March 28, 2009

COUNTY DEPARTMENT

Sheriff's Department

PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AMOUNT

$

50,000

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Tina Locklear, Esq.

COUNTY COUNSEL ATTORNEY

Brian T. Chu

Principal Deputy County Counsel

NATURE OF CASE

On June 29, 2008, at

approximately 5:25 a.m., at the

signalized intersection of Beach

Boulevard and Garden Grove

Bouleyardin theCltyofGardßn

Groy~, aSheriffsd~puty driving

an unmarked Sheriffs vehicle

collided with another vehicle in

which Savanah Kirifi was a

passenger. It is disputed who,

among the drivers, proceeded into

the intersection against a red

traffic signal which resulted in the

collision.

As a result of the collision,

Ms. Kirifi received injuries,

including a concussion, and soft

(4)

PAID ATTORNEY FEES, TO DATE

PAID COSTS, TO DATE

HOA. 706981.

tissue injuries to her neck and

back, and incurred approximately

$34,000 in medical expenses.

Due to the inherent risks and

uncertainties involved in a trial, the

potential

liability and potential

exposure to an adverse verdict,

the County proceeded with

settement negotiations and was

eventually able to develop this

recommended settement with the

plaintiff.

$

110,662

(5)

Summary Corrective Action

Plan

Case Name: Savanah Klrifi v. County of Los Angeles

The Intent of this fonn is to assist departents in wnting a -corrctive action plan summary for attchment to the settement documents developed for the Board of Supervisors and/or the County of Los Angeles Claims Board. The summary should be a specific overview of the claimsflawsuits' identied root causes

and correctlve actons (status, time frme, and responsible part). This summary does not replace the

Correce Acton Plan form. If there is a question related to confidentiality. please consult

County CounseL.

Date of incident/event:

Sunday, June 29; 2008; approximately 5:25 a.m.

Briefly pr:vide a description

Savanah Kiri v. County of Los Anaeles

of the incident/event:

(Summary Corrive Action Plan No. 2010-017)

On Sunday, June 29,2008, at approximately 5:25 a.m., an on duty Los

Angeles

County

Sheriffs

Department employee was

driving

an

unmarked Los Angeles

County-owned

vehicle south on Beach Boulevard (State Route 39), when the vehicle he was driving collded

with a vehicle traveling east on Garden Grove Boulevard, Stanton

(County of Orange).

1. Briefly describe the root cause(s) of the claimllawsuit

A public entity is reponsible for the negligent act of it employees when the acts are committed in the

course and scope of employment.

As a result of this traffc collsion, the plaintiff was transported to a local hospital for treatment of her

(njurles. .

The vehicle in which the plaintiff was trveling (righ~ front seat passenger), a 1999 Mazda Protégé,

Califrnia License Number 5PHP453, sustained major dàmage.

The Los Ang~les Countyemplgyee was transported to a local hospital for tratment of his injurias.

The vehicle the Los Angeles Count employee was driving, a 2005 Chevrolet Trailblazer, CalifornIa

License Number 5KUG920, sustained major damage.

2. Briefly describe recmmended corrctive actions:

(Incude each corrective action, due date, responsIble part, and any disciplinary actions If appropriate)

The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Departent had relevant policies and procedure/protocols in effect at

the tirre of this incident.

The

Los Angeles County Sheriffs Departments training curriculum addresses the circumstances which

occurred in this incident.
(6)

County of Los Angeles

Summary Corrective Action Plan

This trffc collsion was thoroughly investigated by representatives of the Orange County Sherifs

Departenfs Major Accident Reconstruction Team (MA~T). Their investigation concluded that the Los

Angeles County employee caused the collsion by violating California Vehicle Code section 23152(a),

Driving Under Influence of Alcohol or Drugs, and Califomia Vehicle Code secion 21453(a), Circular red or Red Arrow.

The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Deparenfs administrtie review revealed employee misconduct.

Appropriate administrative action was taken.

This summary corrective action plan has the potential to afct all Los Angeles County departments

(see #2 below).

3. State if the correctve actions are applicable to only your deparment or other County departments: (If unsure, please contact the Chief Exective Offce Risk Management Branch for assistnce)

CJ

lQ

Potentially has Countyde implictions.

Potentially has an implicaion to other departments (i.e., all human services, all safety

departents, or one or more other departents).

CJ Does not appear to have Countyide or other departent(s) implications.

Los Angeles County Sheriffs Departent Name: (RIsk Management Coordinator)

flC71JJ6 (! Trl ,.J

Date:

~ C) ~ 7(-r!)()

Name: (Dèpartent Head)

~

~AiG-Ç! ct

(l Gf

Date:

o~~ Il D

This section intentionally left blank.

(7)

County of Los Angeles

Summary Correctve Acton Plan

Chief Executive Offce Risk Management Branch

I Name:~O'o C",a. ve 'L

.sign~ Irq¡1/,o

. tRlsk Mgllnspecr GeneiAP~CA-RECAPfSUmmary Corrcte Acn Pla Fonn 2-01-1 0 (Fal).doc

*i.t.~ a.f('~'JD.\ \ s 'ø4.)~ti 0/\ ifltoMo."CW CWa;\~\~ -\ l!~ st-f

th.tf'\l"j rLV~ 4V .

(8)

CASE SUMMARY

INFORMATION ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION

CASE NAME

Bryan D. Moore, et al. v. County

of

Los Angeles, et al.

CASE NUMBER

TC 022412

COURT

Los Angeles Superior Court-South

Central

DATE FILED

June, 26, 2008

COUNTY DEPARTMENT

Sheriff's Department

PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AMOUNT

$

350,000

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

The Cochran Firm

COUNTY COUNSEL ATTORNEY

Gordon W. Trask, Principal

Deputy County Counsel,

(213) 974-1921

NATURE OF CASE

Plaintiffs Bryan David Moore, and

Alice Smith the surviving father

and mother of Bryan David Lee

Moore, allege that on 06/26/2008,

their civil rights and their son's civil

rights were violated when the

son

was shot and kiled by Sheriff

Deputies. They claim that the

Deputies use of deadly force was

not warranted.

The Deputy who shot Mr. Moore

contends that he fired in

self-defense.

Due to the risks and uncertainties

of litigation, and in light of the fact

that a prevailing plaintiff in a

federal civil rights lawsuit is

(9)

PAID ATTORNEY FEES, TO DATE

PAID COSTS, TO DATE

HOA.7161771

entitled to an award of reasonable

attorneys' fees, a full and final

settlement of the case in the

amount of $350,000 is

recommended.

$

63,229

(10)

Summary Corrective Action Plan

Case Name: Brvan David Moore. et al. v. County of Los Anaeles

The Intent of this fomi Is to assist departments In wrting a corrective action plan summary for attchment to the settlement documents developed for the Board of Supervisors and/or the County of Los Angeles Claims Board. The summary should be a specific overiew of the claims/lawsuits' identified root causes

and corrective actions (status, time frme, and responsible part). This summary does not replace the

Corrective Action Plan form. If there Is a queson related to confidentialit. please consult

County Counsel.

Date of incident'event:

Thursday, June 26, 2008; approximately 5-:55 p.m.

Briefly provde a descriptin

of the incident/event:

Brvan David Moore. et al. V. Count of Los Anaeles (Summary Corrective Action Plan No. 2010-018)

On Thursday, June 26, 2008, at approximately 5:55 p.m., Bryan David

Lee Moore was walking in the vicinity of 1009 East 150th Stree,

Compton, when two Los Angeles County

deputy sheriffs approached

him to Investigate his involvement in possible criminal activity. Mr.

Moore fled on foot, and both deputies observed Mr. Moore to be holding a firearm as he fled.

The deputies Immediately established a perimeter around the area and

located Mr. Moore. One deputy ordered Mr. Moore to stop and show

his hands.' Mr. Moore, who had one hand in his waistband area,

suddenly began to turn toward the deputy. The deputy believed he was

about to be shot and fired three rounds at Mr. Moore. Mr. Moore was

transported to a local hospilal where he was pronounced dead.

1. Briefly describe the roo cause(s) of the claimllawsuit

The County is responsible for the negligent and Intentional act of its employees when the acts are

committed in the cours and scope of employment

The p1iaintis $On, BTYélnPavid Lee Moore, was shot and kiled by an on duty member of the Los

Angeles County Sheriffs Deparment.

The plaintiff, Bryan David Moore, is the surviving father of the decedent, Brn David Lee Moore.

Potential damages Include loss of care, comfort, and society, and an award of reasonable attorneys'

fees.

This section intentionally left blank.

\,

(11)

County of Los Angeles

Summary Corrective Acion Plan

2. Briefly describe recommended corrctive actions:

(Include each corrctve action, due date, responsible part, and any disciplinary actIons If appropriate)

The Los Angeles County Shenfs Departent had relevant policies and procedure/protocols in effec at

the time of this incident

The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department's trining curriculum addresss the circumstance which occurrd in this Incident

The Los Angeles County Shenffs Department's admInistrative review revealed employee misconduct

Appropriate administrative action was taken.

This summar correcve acton plan does not appear to have Countyide or other departent(s)

implications (see #3 below).

3. State if the correcte actions ate applicable to only your department or other County deparents: (If unsure, please contact the Chief Executive Ofce Risk Management Branch for assistace)

o Potentially has Countyide implications.

o Potentially has an implication to other departents (i.e., all human service. all safety

departents, or one or more other departents).

p" Does not appear to have Countyide or other department(s) implications.

Los Angeles County Sherifs Departent

Name: (Risk Management Coordiritor) Shaun J. Mathers, Acting Captain

Signature: Date:

~

c;

~

7 /~?!!IO

Name: (Departent Risk Manager) .

Date:

(l~

1(;u (i 0

This section intentionally .left blank.

(12)

Couiity of Los Angeles

Summary Corrtive Acton Plan

Chief Executive Offce Risk Management Branch

eL

Date:

q G1 /'0

tRfsk Mgllns -SCAP.RECAP/Summary core Aclon Plan Form 2..1-10 (FlnaJ.doc

*R~ 4l~c.\ ì s Io;)ed Dt\ i "~IY ~lfd;'a-\c -h ~) ~1-.t

d.U.f\ l' f Lv\~. .

References

Related documents

The authors developed a BIM plug-in application, shown in Figure 6, to assist HVAC facility inspectors in determining their plan of action. Upon querying, the

Therefore, the IDI team developed 3 tools; an action plan for staff and management, a screening tool for symptomatic patients, and a laboratory information leaflet to assist guide

A summary of two Scottish Government documents; New Horizons: responding to the challenges of the 21st century (2008) and Learning for Change: Scotland’s Action Plan for the Second

Board Action Required: Motion to grant conditional approval of a site plan for parking lot upgrades and associated site improvements, 33 Londonderry Road, Map 10 Lot 87

The frameworks developed at the Summit will assist in the development a regional Action Plan to eliminate racial disparities in birth outcomes, which in turn will inform the

There are four key documents that form the core of IT strategy: a one- to two-page board summary, a 15- to 20-page strategy document, an IT strategic plan and an IT operating plan.