How To Implement An Essip

(1)

Years 2014‑2018 – Level 1

(Formally known as LCIP)

Local Single Sky ImPlementation

(LSSIP) UKRAINE

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Ukraine

Infocentre Reference: 14/01/07-41

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2013

LSSIP Year 2013 Ukraine Edition Date: 25/04/14

LSSIP Focal Point - Ruslan Hutsan E-mail: [email protected]

UkSATSE

LSSIP Contact Person – Ana Paula Frangolho E-mail: ana-paula.

[email protected] Unit DSS/EIPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft  General Public 

Draft  Agency Stakeholders 

Proposed Issue  Restricted Audience 

Released Issue 

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: X:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Ukraine (UA)\Year 2013\Released\LSSIP_2013_UA_Released.doc

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1. LSSIP Guidance Material: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

2. ESSIP Plan Edition 2013: www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

3. ESSIP Report 2012: www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

4. STATFOR Forecasts: www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

5. Acronyms and abbreviations: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

6. European ATM Master Plan: https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

7. LSSIP Documents: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Executive Summary

State Context

The State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU) was created in accordance with Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011 - “Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”.

The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft was established under Article 9 of the Air Code of Ukraine and Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine №228 dated 21 March 2012 and became operational from 01 Feb 2013.

Initialing of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between Ukraine and EU and its member states took place in Vilnius on 28 of November 2013.

Joint Statement on cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension to Ukraine was signed in Brussels on 27.11.2013 by Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine and Vice-President and Commissioner of EC.

The implementation of the ESARRs is progressing well, although not yet completed. Complementary rules for ESARR 5 are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready in 2014. In accordance with the statement of Ukraine on the 36th Session of EUROCONTROL Provisional Council the RP1 should be considered as a transitional period for Ukraine, focusing on the monitoring of the Performance Indicators during RP1 with the intention of target setting in RP2.

EUROCONTROL provided official deliverables of the Project Management Plan in the context of the “Agreement for EUROCONTROL support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” (see Chapter 5).

A numbers of national projects are planned and regional international activities are in place (see Chapter 4 and 5).

Ukraine is planning to establish Upper Information Region within Ukrainian airspace with vertical limits from FL 275 (included) to UNL.

ESSIP Objective Implementation

There are plans for completing objectives due for: ●2014 - AOP03, FCM01, SAF10, SRC-SLRD;

● 2015 - AOM19, AOP04.1, AOP04.2, ATC16, COM09, COM10, FCM03, ITY-COTR, ITY-FMTP, ITY-SPI.

(12)

LSSIP 2013 - Ukraine

*

FOC Date

█

Planned implementation date

(see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives

<=2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air _{Traffic (GAT) handling} [IDP] _[E]

*

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] _[E]

*

AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 [E]

*

AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] _[E]

*

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions

*

ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict

Alert (STCA) - level 2 [E]

*

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity

Warning - level 2 [E]

*

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe _{Altitude Warning - level 2} [E]

*

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path _{Monitor - level 2} [E]

*

ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E]

*

ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and _{conformance monitoring} [E]

*

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic

AMAN operations

[IDP]

[E]

*

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

*

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller

during Coordination and Transfer [IDP] [E]

*

COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks _{or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)} [IDP]

*

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS

*

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in _ATM

*

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E]

*

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP]

[E]

*

FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP]

[E]

*

FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP]

[E]

*

INF04 Implement integrated briefing

*

ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical

information [E]

*

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] _[E]

*

ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements _{below FL195}

*

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination _processes [E]

*

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP]

*

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability

*

NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E]

*

NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP]

(13)

LSSIP 2013 - Ukraine

*

FOC Date

█

Planned implementation date

(see legend at the bottom of the table) SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations _{caused by airspace infringements}

*

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

*

SRC-CHNG Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by

National Supervisory Authorities (NSA)

*

SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory

Requirements (ESARRs)

*

SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies

*

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives

<=2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

UKBB-Kiev

AOP01.2

Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency

implementation manual

*

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and

Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 [E]

*

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and

Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2

*

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP]

[E]

*

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) _{techniques for environmental improvements} [IDP]

_*

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management _{(CEM) at Airports}

_*

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Ukraine/Kiev airport does not participate in this obj.)

Late

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.

(14)

(15)

Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a five-year plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2014-2018 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2013. The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

 Chapters 1 to 5 present the key players in the State, and sets the institutional and geographical scenes to help the reader understand the specifics of the State and interpret the rest of the document correctly. It also presents a short description of the main national and regional projects in which the national Stakeholders are involved.

 Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

(16)

(17)

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical

Scope

1.1.1 International Membership

Ukraine is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC  15.12.1999 EUROCONTROL  01.05.2004 European Union No

European Common Aviation Area No *

EASA No**

ICAO  09.09.1992

NATO No

* Initiation of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between Ukraine and EU and its member states took place in Vilnius on 28 of November 2013.

** 1. Cooperation on the basis of Working Arrangements in the framework of the transition of the Joint Aviation Authorities and on collection and exchange of information on the safety of aircraft using community airports and airports of the relevant country (done at Brussels on 07 March 2007).

2. Working Arrangement between the SAAU and EASA (done at Paris 2009).

1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses Kyiv, Simferopol’, Dnipropetrovs’k, Odesa and L’viv FIRs.

The Ukrainian ATS Airspace is surrounded by 10 FIRs of 9 different States namely, Minsk FIR (Belarus), Moscow FIR and Rostov–na-Donu FIR (Russia), Ankara FIR (Turkey), Varna FIR (Bulgaria), Bucharest FIR (Romania), Chisinau FIR (Moldova), Budapest FIR (Hungary), Bratislava FIR (Slovak Republic) and Warszawa FIR (Poland). Two of the surrounding States, Russia and Belarus, are non-ECAC States. The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 275.

Ukraine is planning to establish Upper Information Region within Ukrainian airspace with vertical limits from FL 275 (included) to UNL.

The lateral boundaries of 5 existing FIRs of Ukraine are retained in the published boundaries in accordance with International Agreements and current edition of ICAO European Air Navigation Plan (ICAO Doc 7754) with vertical limits from ground to FL 275 (not included).

(18)

1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation

(19)

Note: Airspace P, R, D, T – areas, TSA/TRA, CBA, CTR and TMA of military aerodromes of Ukraine is not classified according to ICAO SARPs.

Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the high seas where the air traffic services are delegated to Ukraine by international agreements, consists of the following structural elements:

 5 Flight Information Regions (Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, Kyiv FIR, L’viv FIR, Odesa FIR and Simferopol’ FIR);

 23 CTA Sectors;

 23 TMAs which include 3 military TMAs;

 46 Control Zones (CTRs) which include 20 military CTRs;  5 Aerodrome Flight Information Zones (AFIZs);

 Aerodrome Traffic Zones (ATZs) – usually set up for each touchdown pad;  115 ATS routes and routes set up for crossing the state border of Ukraine.;  33 Prohibited Areas;

 207 Restricted Areas;  76 Danger Areas;

 192 Training Areas, 62of them are stated as temporary airspacereservation;  Special rules zone airspace – set up along the state border.

1.2 National

Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Ukraine are the following: - Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine

- Ministry of Defence of Ukraine

- The Regulator, the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU); - The ATM Service Provider, UkSATSE.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the following diagram:

(20)

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information

The SAAU was created in accordance with Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011 - “Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”. The SAAU is a separate and independent regulatory body. Activity of the SAAU is controlled and directed by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine through the Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine.

The SAAU is institutionally separated from the Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE). The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The SAAU is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation

responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making MoI, SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated 19/05/2011 , Decrees of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” and N581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine", Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine” The aviation related regulatory acts are developed by the SAAU and approved at the level of MoI.

Safety Oversight SAAU Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”,

Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010 Manual of Integrated management System of UkSATSE” approved by UkSATSE and agreed by SAA 25.12.2012.

Establishment of Tolerable

Safety Levels SAAU

Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010 Safety Performance Monitoring SAAU "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic

Management" dated 31/05/2010 № 320 Enforcement actions in case of

non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

SAAU “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification’ approved by Order of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine №42 dated 22/01/2007

Airspace SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated 19/05/2011, Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine”.

Economic MoI Decree of the President of Ukraine № 581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine".

Environment SAAU Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”

Security SAAU Low of Ukraine N545-IV dated 20/02/2003 "The State Security Programme in areas of Civil Aviation",

Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”

(21)

Although Single European Sky (SES) is not applicable to Ukraine (see also Chapter 2), ANSP certification is carried out in accordance with “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification” approved by the order of the MoT № 42 dated 22/01/2007 (with amendments for requirements to ANSPs that provide MET services (order of MoI N575 dated on 28.11.2011) that was developed in line with the EC Regulation 1035/2011.

Website of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (MoTC): http://www.mtu.gov.ua (in Ukrainian language).

Website of State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU): www.avia.gov.ua (in Ukrainian, Russian languages).

Website of Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE): http://www.uksatse.ua/

(in Ukrainian, Russian and English languages).

1.2.1.2 State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU)

The Regulatory Body in the field of Civil Aviation in Ukraine is the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU), established by the Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011

It is a separate and independent regulatory body. It is institutionally separated from the ANSP.

The SAAU is composed of civil representatives only, but appropriate Military Authorities (MoD) are involved in the airspace planning process in accordance with the "Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine". The SAAU is responsible for the provision of effective functioning of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.

The structure of the SAAU and UkSATSE are shown in Annex B.

Annual Report published: The Annual Safety Report for 2011 was published in Feb 2012 (N 19.2.11-2a).

The Safety Report for 9 months of 2012 was published on 20.10.201 19.2.11-11A

The Annual Safety Report for 2012 was drafted and will be published not later than 20/02/2012.

1.2.2 UkSATSE

Name of the ANSP: Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE)

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y See section 2.3.

SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 27.12.2011 according to national legislation.

ATC approach Y See comment above. ATC Airport(s) Y See comments above.

AIS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 27.12.2011 according to national legislation.

AFIS Y See comments above.

CNS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 27.12.2011 according to national legislation.

MET Y Certified by SAAU for en-route meteorological service. SAAU certified UkSATSE in June 2012 for en-route meteorological service.

Meteorological service at airports is provided by the State Hydro - meteorological Service of Ministry of Emergency Situations.

(22)

ATCO training Y Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE provides:initial training; unit training; continuation training (conversion training, training for unusual circumstances and emergencies, refresher training, language training); development training.

Others Y Flight Calibration Service. Additional information:

Provision of services in

other State(s): Y 1. Part of the airspace of the Black Sea for which the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine according to international agreements. 2. In order to facilitate Approach Control Services for Uzhhorod Airport located close to the State Border, Air traffic services are delegated to Uzhhorod APP within part of airspace (Prohibited Area) of the Slovak Republic.

1.2.2.1 ATC system in use

Location Supplier and

Product Scope Type Put in Ops

Simferopol’ Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Victoriya” APP, TWR Systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing systems, surveillance data processing systems and human-machine interface systems 2007 Simferopol’ INDRA, Spain,

AIRCON 2100 APP, TWR (Back-Up) SEP2014

Lviv Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Kseniya” ACC, APP, TWR 2001 Lviv, (replacement) Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Roksolana”

ACC, APP, TWR SEP2014

Odesa Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine, “Anastasiya-II” ACC, APP, TWR 2003 Odesa, (replacement) INDRA, Spain,

“AIRCON 2100” ACC, APP, TWR DEC2015

Kiev SELEX, Italy,

“Strela – Alenia” ACC, APP & TWR FEB2012

Kiev

ALES,

Chez Republic, “Letvis”

ACC, APP (Back-Up) OCT2012

Dnipropetrovs’k INDRA, Spain, _{“AIRCON 2000”} ACC, APP, TWR 2008 Dnipropetrovs’k,

(upgrading to provide back-up facilities)

INDRA, Spain,

“AIRCON 2100” ACC, APP, TWR FEB 2014

Donets’k INDRA, Spain,

“AIRCON 2100” APP, TWR MAY 2012

Kharkiv INDRA, Spain,

“AIRCON 2100” APP, TWR AUG 2013

Zaporizhzhya

Aerotechnica Ltd, Ukraine,

“Irina”

(23)

1.2.2.2. ATC units of UkSATSE

The following table lists the ACCs and APPs (with associated FIRs) in the Ukrainian ATS airspace, including the airspace where the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine.

ATC Unit Number of

sectors

Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route

TMA

Kyiv ACC 7 5 UKBV Kyiv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Kyiv FIR

Odesa ACC 5 2 UKOV Odesa FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Odesa FIR

L’viv ACC 4 1 UKLV L’viv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within L’viv FIR

Dnipropetrovs’k ACC 6 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within south-west of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, from FL265 to UNL north and south-east part of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR from FL265 to UNL

Kharkiv APP 3 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR _{ATC + FIS service: GND-FL}₂₆₅ within TMA

Donets’k APP 2 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR _{ATC + FIS service: GND-FL}₂₆₅ within TMA

Luhans’k APP+TWR ₁ UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service Ivano-Frankivs’k

APP+TWR 1

UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service Uzhhorod APP+TWR ₁ UKLV L’viv FIR APP+PAR+TWR service Zaporizhzhia

APP+TWR 1

UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service Chernivtsi TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service Dnipropetrovs’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service Donets’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service Kharkiv TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service Kryvyi Rih TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service Kyiv/Boryspil’ TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service Kyiv/Zhuliany TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service L’viv TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR TWR service Mariupol’ TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service Mykolaiv TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR APP+TWR service Odesa TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR TWR service Rivne TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service Simferopol’ TWR 2 UKFV Simferopol’ FIR TWR service Vinnytsia/Gavrishivka

TWR

X UKBV Kyiv FIR APP+TWR service Kirovohrad TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service Poltava TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service Sumy TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

(24)

1.2.2.3. Air traffic control service

4 ACCs (Kyiv, L’viv, Odesa and Dnipropetrovs’k) provide area and approach control services, flight information and alerting services within CTAs.

6 APPs (Donetsk, Kharkiv, Luhans’k, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Zaporizhzhia and Uzhhorod) provide approach control service within TMAs.

21 TWRs provide aerodrome control service in civil aerodromes Chernivtsi, Dnipropetrovs’k, Donets’k, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kharkiv, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv (Zhuliany), L’viv, Luhans’k, Mariupol’, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Rivne, Simferopol’, Sumy, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia and within its CTRs.

1.2.2.4. Flight information service

Flight information sectors of ACCs/APPs provide flight information service within FIRs. Flight information service (FIS) is provided:

 within controlled airspace (class C, D) – by ATC units (ACCs/APPs/TWRs);

 outside controlled airspace (class G, GND-1500 AMSL) - by 7 flight information sectors which are in 4 ACCs (Kyiv – 2 sectors, L’viv – 2 sectors, 1 sector, Odesa – 1 sector, Dnipropetrovs’k – 1 sector) and by 2 flight information sectors are situated in APP units (Donets’k – 1 sector, Kharkiv - 1 sector).

1.2.2.5. Aerodrome flight information service

5 AFIS units provide flight information service in AFIS aerodromes: Zhytomyr (Ozerne), Ternopil’, Kherson, Kaniv (Pekari) and Cherkasy.

1.2.2.6. Alerting Service

All ATS units are responsible to provide alerting service within its area of responsibility according to Ukrainian legislation.

ACCs serve as the central point for collecting all information relevant to a state of emergency of an aircraft operating within the flight information region or control area concerned and for forwarding such information to appropriate regional Search and Rescue Co-ordination Centers of the Ministry of Emergencies of Ukraine that are situated in each ACCs.

In case of emergency in civil aerodromes concerned TWR informs appropriate service set up within the framework of the search and rescue units and other services and units specified in the related coordination instructions.

To collect and share ATS messages, there are:

 13 Air Traffic Service Reporting Offices (AROs) at airports: Chernivtsi, Ivano-Frankivs’k,

Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Luhans’k, Mariupol’, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Rivne, Sumy, Uzhhorod, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia;

 8 AROs, which belong to briefing offices: Dnipropetrovs’k, Donets’k, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv(Zhuliany), L’viv, Odesa, Simferopol’ and Kharkiv.

(25)

1.2.3. Airports

1.2.3.1. General information

The airport network in Ukraine comprises 35 certified aerodromes of which 25 have international checkpoints.

Kyiv Boryspil International Airport, the only airport covered in this LSSIP edition, is the main international airport in Ukraine and accounts for over 45% of all IFR operations at Ukrainian airports/aerodromes. Aerodromes Simferopol’, Odesa, Kyiv Zhuliany, Donetsk, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs’k, and L’viv are strategic. Other aerodromes are domestic. In accordance with international standards, the service zone of strategic aerodromes is within 200-250km.

The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.

1.2.3.2. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.

1.2.4. Military Authorities

The Military Authorities (the Ministry of Defence) in Ukraine are composed of:

- The General Staff;

- The Armed Forces (Air Force, Ground Force and Naval).

The main responsibilities of the Air Force are:

- Air defence of airspace of Ukraine; - Monitoring of airspace usage;

- Air Traffic Control within unclassified airspace (TSA, TRA, R, D-zone, CTR and TMA of

military aerodromes).

Air traffic control to OAT is ensured by a network of controlling military units that are responsible for providing services to OAT, planning and co-ordination the use of airspace with respective bodies of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.

The controlling military units are a part of a common combat system of operation of the Armed Forces. The controlling military units are provided OAT services in accordance with specific rules and procedures. They report to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

1.2.4.1. Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed

by national legal provisions? Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? N/A Level of such legal provision: State Law, Ministerial

Decree, Air Force Regulation Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister,

Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force

Authority signing such legal provision: N/A These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A

OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N/A ATCO Training Y ATCO Training _N/A ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing _N/A ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification _N/A

(26)

Oversight

1.2.4.2. Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT

services SES certified? N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate: N/A Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in

accordance with SES regulations? N/A Additional Information:

ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision _N/A Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability _N/A

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: OAT provided by Military ATC units

Additional Information: Military ATC units do not provide services to GAT

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP N/A National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A

Other: N/A Other: N/A

OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: General Staff NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services

provided by the military: N/A

Additional information: Additional information: GAT is provided by respective ATS units (ACCs) of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System.

OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route N En-Route N Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND _Y Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS _Y AIS N MET _Y MET N SAR _Y SAR N

TSA/TRA monitoring _Y FIS N

Other: Other: Additional Information: Additional Information:

(27)

1.2.4.3. User role

1.2.4.4. Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Remark: FUA requirements at the Levels 2 and 3 are implemented by the military in the framework of the Integrated civil-military ATM system of Ukraine.

1.2.5. Accident/incident Investigation Body

1.2.5.1. Technical investigations

The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft was established under Article 9 of the Air Code of Ukraine and of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Regulation №228 dated 21 March 2012. The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft and became operational from 01 Feb 2013.

1.2.5.2. Collection, Evaluation & Processing of Data

In order to carry out this function, appropriate software tools are under development by the SAAU. 1.2.5.3. Civil-Military Accidents/Incidents

The investigations of accidents/incidents with civil aircrafts are provided by the State Independent Investigation Board.

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft

can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Within specific corridors only Y Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Mode S ACAS Y

Others: Some transport state aircraft are approved for flight in RVSM airspace.

Military in <State> applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y FUA Level 1 implemented: Y

FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y

(28)

Chapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine

Ukraine - Annual IFR Movements

0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F IF R fl ig h ts

IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast IFR movements - High forecast IFR movements - Low forecast

Ukraine - Distribution (Ref. year 2012)

International Dep/Arr 31% Domestic flights 8% Overflights 62% A = Actual F = Forecast 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F H 8,0% 8,3% 6,2% 6,1% 5,6% 5,9% 5,7% B 13,7% 5,5% 2,9% 7,6% 6,4% 4,3% 4,6% 4,0% 4,3% 4,2% L 7,1% 4,6% 2,6% 3,2% 2,7% 2,8% 2,7% ESRA B 0,8% 3,1% -2,4% -0,9% 1,4% 2,6% 2,7% 2,2% 2,5% 2,5%

STATFOR Medium-Term Forecast (September 2013)

IFR flights yearly growth

Ukraine

2013

Traffic in the Ukraine increased by 7.0% during summer 2013 (May to October inclusive), when compared to summer 2012.

2014-2018/19

The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 3.1% and 6.3% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.6%.

(29)

2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK

ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2009-2018/19

UKDVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 IF R f light s ( D aily A ver a ge) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 E n rout e D e lay ( m in ut es pe r f light )

Peak Day Traffic 533 527 577 703 645 Summer Traffic 382 443 488 522 540 Yearly Traffic 337 382 422 446 465

Summer Traffic Forecast 557 584 613 638 668 698 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 567 602 640 681 718 757 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 552 565 585 604 622 640 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2.2.2 Summer 2013 performance

Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baseline

En-route Delay (min/flight)

Capacity gap

Optimum All reasons Without weather

+3.5% 49 (+0%) 0.1-0.2 0.0 0.0 No

Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2012.

Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP FCM01

and FCM03 objectives Yes

Modernization and installation of ATM systems in UKDV ACC (July 2013) and UKHH APP (training and transition periods – from March to May 2013) correspondently

Yes Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures

according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM) No Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures development

(strategic ATFCM) Yes

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes

Summer 2013 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2012. The peak 1 hour demand was 39 flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The peak 3 hour demand was 34.

(30)

2.2.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

The 2014-2018/19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the following parameters:

 2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC as provided in January 2011

 2015-2018/19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5 min/flight

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0.19 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

0.29 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values

UKDVCTA Annual Summer H 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2% 51 2% 53 4% Ref. 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2% 50 0% L 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% C/R 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2% 51 2% ACC _baseline2013 2017 2018 UKDV 49 2014 2015 2016 2019 Capacity Profiles

Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

Capacity Plan Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Measures planned Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Step 1 – Night) ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM)

procedures

Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development

Significant events

Max sectors 6 6 6 6 6 6

Capacity increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%

(31)

UKDVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 C a p aci ty pro fi le ( m ov ement s per hou r)

2014-2019 Reference Capacity Profile 49 49 49 49 50 50

Capacity Profile - Current Routes 49 49 49 49 50 51

Capacity Profile - High 49 49 49 50 51 53

Capacity Profile - Low 49 49 49 49 49 49

Capacity Baseline 49 49

2014 - 2019 Plan 49 49 49 50 51 53

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2.3 KYIV

ACC

UKBVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 IF R f light s ( D a ily A ver age) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 E n ro ut e Delay ( m inut es p e r f ligh t)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2014-2018/19 Planning Period Outlook

(32)

+3.9% 72 (0%) 0.1 – 0.2 0.0 0.0 No

Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM)

Yes Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures

development (strategic ATFCM) Yes

ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP

FCM01, FCM03 and AOP05 objectives Yes

Maximum configuration: 7 sectors No Maximum configuration: 6 sectors

The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2012. The peak 1 hour demand was 59 flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The peak 3 hour demand was 51 flights.

 2015-2018/19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5 min/flight 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 UKBVCTA Summer Annual

H 72 0% 72 0% 74 3% 78 5% 81 4% 87 7%

Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 73 1% 74 1% 76 3% 78 3%

L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 73 1%

C/R 72 0% 72 0% 73 1% 74 1% 76 3% 78 3%

Capacity Profiles

2015 2016 2017 2018 ACC _baseline2013 2014 UKBV 72 2019 Capacity Plan Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Measures planned

Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Implementation

of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives

procedures ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Step 1 – Night) Significant events Max sectors 7 7 7 7 7 7 Capacity

increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference

profile 0% 0% 1% 1% 3% 3%

Additional information

(33)

UKBVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 C a p aci ty pro fi le ( m ov ement s per hou r)

2014 - 2019 Plan 72 72 74 78 81 87

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2.4 LVIV

ACC

UKLVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 IF R f light s ( D a ily A ver age) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 E n ro ut e Delay ( m inut es p e r f ligh t)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

(34)

+3.6% 72 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No

Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures

according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM) Yes Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures development

Installation of new ATM system (training and transition periods –

from August to October 2013 Yes

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

UKLVCTA Annual Summer H 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% C/R 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 73 1% 2014 2015 2016 UKLV 72 ACC _baseline2013 ₂₀₁₇ ₂₀₁₈ ₂₀₁₉ Capacity Profiles

Capacity Plan

Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Measures planned

Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development ATFCM training of

ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL

procedures Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Step 1 – Night) Installation of new ATM system (training and transition periods – from August to November 2014) Max sectors 4 4 4 4 4 4 Capacity

Reference

profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

(35)

UKLVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 50 55 60 65 70 75 C a p aci ty pro fi le ( m ov ement s per hou r)

2014 - 2019 Plan 72 72 72 72 72 72

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2.5 ODESA

ACC

UKOVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 IF R f light s ( D a ily A ver age) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 E n ro ut e Delay ( m inut es p e r f ligh t)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

(36)

+ 16.7% 59 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No

Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures

according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM) Yes Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures development

Implementation of P-RNAV in TMA Yes

(37)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Annual Summer

UKOVCTA H 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% Ref. 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% L 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% C/R 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% ACC _baseline2013 2017 2018 UKOV 59 2014 2015 2016 2019 Capacity Profiles

Capacity Plan

Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Measures planned

Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Implementation

of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) procedures ATFCM training

of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL

Installation of new ATM system Free Route Airspace Implementation (FRAU Ukraine, Step 1 – Night) Significant events Max sectors 5 5 5 5 5 5 Capacity

Reference

profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Additional information

UKOVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Capaci ty pr ofi le (m ovem ents p er hour )

2014 - 2019 Plan 59 59 59 59 59 59

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

(38)

Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2012 applicable to Ukraine for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Number Recommendation Ownership

REC-2012-03

To ensure that all Stakeholders report the expected completion dates as defined in their National business plans.

Reply: Actions of the Business Plan of UkSATSE have links with SLoAs of LSSIP objectives.

All States

REC-2012-05 To ensure correct application of LSSIP guidance material and to _{implement the results of mandatory LSSIP in-cycle check.} All States

REC-2012-10

To ensure actions for overcoming present delays in the implementation of basic ATSMHS capability (ESSIP objective COM10).

Reply: The contract for AMHS system installation is in progress. FAT has been successfully completed in November 2013 and the delivery of equipment is expected on the beginning of 2014.

AL, AM, AZ, CY, CZ, DK, EE, FI, FR, GR, HR, HU, IT, LU, MAS, MD, MT, NO, SE,

SI, UA

REC-2012-11

States to ensure that appropriate actions are taken for overcoming present delays in the implementation of priority capabilities specified in the ESSIP objective FCM03.

Reply: Appropriate actions are planned in line with ESSIP. FCM03-ASP03 has links with COM10 and will be completed when COM10 is completed.

BE, UK, SE, NO, FI, LV, PL, HU, UA, AM, TR, MK, FR, PT, MT, RO, HR, BA, AL, SI, IT, CZ, MAS, CY.

REC-2012-15

To ensure actions for overcoming present delays in the implementation of remaining SLoAs for implementation of P-RNAV (ESSIP objective NAV03).

Reply: ESSIP objective is completed.

AL, AZ, BA, BE, BG, CY, DE, EE, ES, GE, GR, HR, HU, IT, LV, ME, MT, NO,

PT, RS, SI, UA, UK

Interim Deployment Programme View

REC-2012-22

States are encouraged to speed up the AFP implementation and to schedule AFP testing with Network Manager

Reply:

FCM01 implementation:

- Transportation clearance of ETFMS equipment Entry Nodes (COMSOFT), ATM system modernization in Dnipropetrovs’k ACC, Installation of ATM system in Lviv ACC are the delay contributors.

- FCM01 is implemented for Kyiv ACC .

- FCM01 Implementation for Odessa, and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs - 02/2014

- FCM01 implementation in Lviv ACC will be completed after Installation of ATM system (12/2014

Implementation of the AFP refers to FCM03.

All UkSATSE ATM systems process AFP in ICAO format. UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP format as soon as Objective COM10 .

Related AFP testing was successfully completed in all ACC/APP, except of Lviv ACC, where ATM system is expected

(39)

REC-2012-31

ANSPs to increase activities towards the migration to IP. Reply:

The infrastructure for IP connection between centres is available.

The migration is in progress. Kyiv ATC centre is ready to support FMTP and IP connection.

Other ATC centers are under upgrading (Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk, Kharkiv, L’viv will be completed within 2 quarter 2014, Odesa ATC centre will be replaced with IP connection

possibility within 2014-2015).

The testing of FMTP connection between Kyiv ATC centre and Chisinau ATC centre is in progress.

NO, FI, IE, FR, ES, IT, HR, HU, UA, RS, ME, MK, GR,

MT, CY, AZ, SE

Stakeholders View

REC-2012-40

ANSPs are encouraged to publish more APV routes.

(40)

Chapter 4 - National Projects

Name Schedule Description – Scope Status Link with

European Master Plan.

Expected Contribution to the Key

Performance Areas1

BTN 2012/2016 Development (upgrade) of the fixed ground communication infrastructure of UkSATSE’s Backbone Telecommunication Network (BTN). The aim of development is to extend existing

infrastructure (6 main nodes) to 23 regional units all over Ukraine

Project is in progress COM 09 COM 10 COM 11

Safety and Capacity

Extension of BTN shall provide the possibility to exchange any type of ATC oriented information (data/voice) between any application within UkSATSE all over Ukraine

Mode S

MSSRs 2011/2013 5 new stand-alone Mode S MSSRs are planned to be installed in addition to 5 existing Mode S MSSRs, in order to provide Mode S duplicated coverage.

Project is completed All radars are implemented

ITY-SPI Safety and Capacity

Implementation of Mode S (ELS) allows to improve air situation awareness and to increase the responsiveness to air situation changes by:

- receiving of an aircraft identification directly from aircraft

- increasing of flight level data reliability - increasing of air conflict data reliability - increasing of radar tracking quality USENET 2012/2015 6 nodes of USENET are planned to be installed in

UkSATSE’s Regional Branches: - Dnipropetrоvs’k - Donets’k - Kyiv - L’viv - Odesa Development of Technical Requirements is completed. Project is in progress.

SUR03 Safety, Capacity, Cost-efficiency Network shall provide a single ground transport environment between any resources and users, who are a part of the Surveillance System of Ukraine (SSU), and also between them and other authorised civil and military stakeholders on the territory of Ukraine.

1

(41)

ATC centres 2010/ 2015 The upgrade of 5 ATC systems for L’viv ACC/APP/TWR, Kharkiv APP/TWR, Dnipropetrovs’k ACC/APP/TWR, Odesa,

ACC/APP/TWR and Simferopol ACC/APP, consists on changing obsolete equipment to new one with extended functionality.

Remove sectors 1, 2 of Simferopol ACC to Dnipropetrovs’k ACC and sectors 3 ,4 ,5 of Simferopol ACC to Odesa ACC for the period of upgrading.

Project is in progress ATC systems in Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovs’k have been implemented. Planned dates for ATC systems upgrade completion: Lviv - 2014 Odesa - 2015 ATC02.2 ATC02.6 ATC02.5 ENV01 NAV03 AOM20

Safety and Capacity

The upgrade of ATC centres will allow to: - improve the reliability of ATM System operation by using modern computer and telecommunication technologies; - implement system functionality according to the EUROCONTROL and UkSATSE requirements to ATM System; - improve the capacity and air traffic safety in the area of UkSATSE`s responsibility

Registration

facilities 2014/ 2016

Implementation of uniform video and audio registration and playback facilities in ATC units of UkSATSE

It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT)

procedure will be initiated in 2014

Safety

The goal of this project is to improve the reliability and objectivity of the recorded information about controllers actions during the ATC.

ATC simulator 2014/ 2015 Implementation of ATC simulator for Kyiv ATC

center. It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated in 2014 SAF04 SAF05 SAF10 HUM02.1 Safety

The goal of this project is to improve the operative training of controllers who provide the ATS for most loaded area in Ukraine and increase the quality of service and safety of flights in the area of responsibility.

TOWER 2010/2017 Construction of new 3 Towers at civil aerodromes of Ukraine: Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs'k and Kyiv

(Boryspil’).

Kharkiv TWR is implemented

Project is in progress.

AOP03 Safety and Capacity

The construction of new Towers and procurement of new modular Tower will allow tore-equip them with new modern CNS aids in accordance with the

EUROCONTROL’s requirements to TWR ATC units. The result of this activity will increase equipment reliability and maintainability and consequently – safety and capacity of air traffic.

(42)

MODULAR TOWER

2013/2014 Procurement of new modular Tower for civil aerodrome in Kirovohrad

Project is in progress AOP03 Safety and Capacity

The procurement of new 7 modular Towers will allow tore-equip them with new modern CNS aids in accordance with EUROCONTROL’s requirements to TWR ATC units. Outcomes of this activity will be increase equipment reliability, maintainability and consequently – safety and capacity of air traffic.

SMR 2012/2016 Installation of 7 Surface Movement Radars (SMR) for main Ukrainian civil aerodromes: 2 SMRs for Kyiv (Boryspil’) and 1 for: Donets’k, , Kharkiv, Odesa, L’viv and Dnipropetrovs’k

Project is in progress АОР04.2 Safety and Capacity

Implementation of SMRs will allow to improve the manoeuvring area awareness and to increase the responsiveness to ground situation changes in the absence of visual observation of all or part of the manoeuvring area due to:

- providing radar monitoring of traffic on the manoeuvring area;

- providing directional information to pilots and vehicle drivers as necessary; - providing advice and assistance for the safe and efficient movement of aircraft and vehicles on the manoeuvring area. SOFTWARE

TOOL 2014/2015

Procurement of instrument procedure design software tool to improve quality assurance in accordance with ICAO 9906 – “Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design”

Project will start at the

beginning of 2014. NAV03 Safety and Cost-efficiency _{Improvement of safety due to}

improvement in procedures design and cost effectiveness due to automation in the overall process.

Upgrade of Terminal Radars

2011/2014 2 new terminal radars (PSR/MSSR Mode S) are

planned to be installed in 2014 . Radar in Donetsk and _{Kharkiv will be} implemented in 2014

ITY-SPI Safety and Capacity

Implementation of the project allows to improve the quality of air situation awareness and surveillance quality (double coverage)

(43)

Rationalisation of navigation infrastructure 2014/2015 2014/2015 Phase 1:

Installation and implementation of 5 NDBs: 2 – for Chernivtsi aerodrome,

2 – for Ivano-Frankivs’k aerodrome, 1 – for Uzhhorod aerodrome.

Project is completed

Safety Improvement of flight safety and navigation infrastructure on the airspace of Ukraine.

Phase 2:

Installation and implementation of 7 DME/(D)VOR/DME in UkSATSE’s regional branches : 3 – for L’viv , 1 – for Odesa. 1 – for Donets’k 2- for Kharkiv Project is in progress

VSAT 2012/2016 Installation of new equipment in Dnipropetrovs’k, and Odesa for modernization and extension of satellite communication system VSAT.

It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT)

procedure will be initiated in 2014

Safety

VSAT equipment as a back-up means the provision of reliable voice communication between adjacent ACC of the Black Sea region States.

Modernization

of CMASS 2013/ 2014 Implementation of specialized software for decode and render of WAREP data in the centre of CMASS:

UkSATSE’s Regional Branch Kyiv

Project has started in the

end of 2013 Safety and Capacity _{The modernisation of Central}

meteorological aeronavigation system will allow to increase the level of

(44)

Modernization of CMASS

2013/ 2014 Implementation of additional hardware for

visualization of meteorological information for the ATCOs of Flight Information Centres (FIC) in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches:

- Dnipropetrovs’k - Donets’k - Kyiv - L’viv - Odesa

The project has started in

the mid of 2013 Safety _{The modernisation of Central}

meteorological aeronavigation system will allow to increase the level of flight information service

SOFTWARE upgrade

2014 Upgrading of software of VOLMET in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches:

- Dnipropetrovs’k - Kyiv

- L’viv

The project started at the end of 2013

Safety and Capacity

The upgrading of software will allow to increase the level of flight information service

SOFTWARE

upgrade 2014 Upgrading of software of ATIS systems in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches: - Dnipropetrovs’k - Donets’k - Kyiv - L’viv - Odesa - Boryspil

The project started at the

end of 2013 Safety and Capacity _{The upgrading of software will allow to} increase the level of flight information service in TMA

Development of systems of radar observations

2013/2014 Feasibility study and Implementation of Weather radar in UkSATSE’s Regional Branch Odessa

The project started in mid of 2013

Safety and Capacity

The introduction of Weather radar will provide information about the

development of dangerous convective phenomena, their movement and evolution.

(45)

Enhancement of ATIS systems

2014 Purchase of equipment for visualization of index of ATIS messages in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches: - Dnipropetrovs’k - Donets’k - Kyiv - L’viv - Odesa - Boryspil

The project started in mid

of 2013 Safety _{The purchase of equipment for}

visualization of index of ATIS messages will allow to increase the level of flight information service in TMA

Light Gun implementation

2014 Purchase of equipment to replace the old-fashion signalling guns by modern light projectors for ATC Towers (21 sites).

The project will start beginning of the 2014.

Safety Provide the alternative method of communication between pilot on the ground and ATC Tower in case of radio communication failure according to ICAO Annex 14 «AERODROME DESIGN AND OPERATIONS».

(46)

4.1. Objectives that were removed form ESSIP

The following objectives are still mandatory for implementation in Ukraine until their completion.

HUM02.1 Integrate Human Factors into ATM Operations (By:12/2012 / Active) Planned

This objective became obligated for Ukraine in 2011.

Implementation plan for this objective was approved by director general of UkSATSE on 27/06/2012. An applicable area of this objective was changed by EUROCONTROL in October 2011. Implementation of this objective for UkSATSE will take 3 years instead of 4 years according to ESSIP. According to agreement with Agency status of

implementation of this Objective for UkSATSE will be ‐Planned‐ to keep transparent approach for all ESSIP stakeholders.

12/2014

ASP

(By:12/2012)

Implementation plan for this objective was approved by director general of UkSATSE on 27/06/2012. An applicable area of this objective was changed by EUROCONTROL in October 2011. Implementation of this objective for UkSATSE will take 3 years instead of 4 years according to ESSIP. In accordance with agreement with Agency status of implementation of this Objective for UkSATSE will be ‐Planned‐ to keep transparent approach for all ESSIP stakeholders.

Planned

12/2014

MIL

(By:12/2012) Appropriate procedures are in place but not compliant with ECTR documents

Not Applicable

‐

SAF04 Implement measures to reduce the risk of level bust occurrences (By:01/2008 / Active) Planned

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of level bust and of the level bust toolkit and related material.

As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

12/2014

REG

(By:01/2008)

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of level bust and of the level bust toolkit and related material.

As a result, appropriate were included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

Planned

12/2014

ASP

(By:01/2007)

There is an action plan approved by the DG of UkSATSE to implement SAF04. The implementation of the local action plan is completed.

Completed

16/2013

MIL

(By:01/2008) There some specific procedures in place but not compliant with ECTL doc

No Plan

How To Implement An Essip

Years 2014‑2018 – Level 1

(Formally known as LCIP)

Local Single Sky ImPlementation

(LSSIP) UKRAINE

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Ukraine

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary

State Context

ESSIP Objective Implementation

LSSIP 2013 - Ukraine

*

█

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

LSSIP 2013 - Ukraine

*

█

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Introduction

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical

Scope

1.2 National

Stakeholders

Chapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine

2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK

ACC

2.3 KYIV

ACC

2.4 LVIV

ACC

2.5 ODESA

ACC

Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Chapter 4 - National Projects

_*

_*