• No results found

CALCULATE MRR AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS VALUES WITH DIFFERENT PARAMETERS BY TURNING PROCESS USING TAGUCHI METHOD

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "CALCULATE MRR AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS VALUES WITH DIFFERENT PARAMETERS BY TURNING PROCESS USING TAGUCHI METHOD"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Author for correspondence:

1M.Tech Student, Department Of Mechanical Engineering, Holy Mary institute of technology Hyderabad, India.

2Assistant Professor, Department Of Mechanical Engineering, Holy Mary institute of technology Hyderabad, India

Volume-4 Issue-6

International Journal of Intellectual Advancements

and Research in Engineering Computations

CALCULATE MRR AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS VALUES WITH

DIFFERENT PARAMETERS BY TURNING PROCESS USING TAGUCHI

METHOD

J.Rakesh

1

, P Sreenivasan

2

, M Sharanya Teja

3

ABSTRACT

Turning process is one of the most fundamental machining processes used in the manufacturing industry. The process of turning is influenced by many factors such as cutting velocity, feed rate, depth of cut, geometry of cutting tool, and cutting conditions etc., to name a few. In machining operations, achieving the desired surface quality of the machined product is really a challenging job. T his is due to the fact that quality is highly influenced by process parameters directly or indirectly. However, the extent of significant influence of the process parameters is different for different responses. In this work the effect of insert nose radius and machining parameters including cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut on surface roughness and material removal rate (mrr) in a turning operation are investigated by using the Taguchi optimization method.3D modeling done by pro engineer parametric software. Analysis is done by Ansys.

Keywords: Ansys, Taguchi method, Material removal rate (MRR).

INRODUCTION

Introduction to turning

Turning is the removal of metal from the outer diameter of a rotating cylindrical work piece [1]. Turning is used to reduce the diameter of the work piece, usually to a specified dimension, and to produce a smooth finish on the metal [2]. Often the work piece will be turned so that adjacent sections have different diameters. The effects of process parameters on tool life on turning process and the subsequent optimal settings of parameters are accomplished using Taguchi`s method. Surface roughness has become the most significant technical requirement and it is an index of product quality [3]. In order to improve the tribological properties, fatigue strength, corrosion resistance

and aesthetic appeal of the product, a reasonably good surface finish is desired [5].

Chucking the Work piece

We will be working with a piece of 3/4" diameter 6061 aluminum about 2 inches long [4]. A work piece such as this which is relatively short compared to its diameter is stiff enough that we can safely turn it in the three jaw chuck without supporting the free end of the work [6].

For longer work pieces we would need to face and center drill the free end and use a dead or alive center in the tailstock to support it [7]. Without such support, the force of the tool on the work piece would cause it to bend away from the tool, producing a strangely shaped result [8, 9]. There is also the potential that the work could be forced to loosen in the chuck jaws and fly out as a dangerous projectile [10].

(2)

Fig: 1.2 Chucking the Work piece

Insert the work piece in the 3-jaw chuck and tighten down the jaws until they just start to grip the work piece. Rotate the work piece to ensure that it is seated evenly and to dislodge any chips or grit on the surface that might keep it from seating evenly. You want the work piece to be as parallel as possible with the center line of the lathe. Imagine an exaggerated example where the work piece is skewed at a angle in the chuck and you can easily visualize why this is important. Tighten the chuck using each of the three chuck key positions to ensure a tight and even grip.

EN 31 Work Tool Steel

Tool steel refers to a variety of carbon and alloy steels that are particularly well-suited to be made into tools. Their suitability comes from their distinctive hardness, resistance to abrasion, their ability to hold a cutting edge, and/or their resistance to deformation at elevated temperatures (red-hardness). Tool steel is generally used in a heat-treated state.

With carbon content between 0.7% and 1.5%, tool steels are manufactured under carefully

controlled conditions to produce the required quality. The manganese content is often kept low to minimize the possibility of cracking during water quenching. However, proper heat treating of these steels is important for adequate performance, and there are many suppliers who provide tooling blanks intended for oil quenching.

Tool steels are made to a number of grades for different applications. Choice of grade depends on, among other things, whether a keen cutting edge is necessary, as in stamping dies, or whether the tool has to withstand impact loading and service conditions encountered with such hand tools as axes, pickaxes, and quarrying implements. In general, the edge temperature under expected use is an important determinant of both composition and required heat treatment. The higher carbon grades are typically used for such applications as stamping dies, metal cutting tools, etc.Tool steels are also used for special applications like injection molding because the resistance to abrasion is an important criterion for a mold that will be used to produce hundreds of thousands of parts.

Physical Properties Metric

Density 7.81 g/cc

Mechanical Properties

Hardness, Brinell 290 - 341 Tensile Strength, Ultimate 1010 MPa Tensile Strength, Yield 800 MPa Modulus of Elasticity 205 GPa Compressive Yield Strength 850 - 1000 MPa Charpy Impact 5.02 - 10.0 J

Thermal Properties Metric

CTE,linear 12.6 µm/m-°C Specific Heat Capacity 0.460 J/g-°C

Thermal Conductivity 29.0 W/m-K

Component Elements Properties Metric

Carbon, C 0.370 % Chromium, Cr 2.0 % Manganese, Mn 1.40 % Molybdenum, Mo 0.20 % Nickel, Ni 1.0 % Silicon, Si 0.30 %

Sulfur, S <= 0.010 %

Cutting tool material - cemented

(3)

Density 14.95 g/cc

Mechanical Properties Metric

Hardness, Rockwell A 91.9

Hardness, Vickers 1575

Rupture Strength 2200 MPa

Compressive Strength 6200 MPa

Component Elements Properties Metric

Cobalt, Co 6.0 %

WC 94 %

STRUCTURAL ANALYSISOF TOTAL DEFORMATION, STRESS STRAIN IN

TAGUCHI METHOD

FORCE -1150N

(4)

FIG: Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 1150N

FORCE -992N

(5)

FIG: Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 992N FORCE -688N

(6)

FIG: Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 688N FORCE -550N

(7)

FIG :Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 550N

FORCE -375N

(8)

(9)

FORCE -270N

Total deformation: Stress and Strain

FIG :Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 270N

(10)
(11)

FIG : Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 465N FORCE -297N

(12)

FIG :Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 297N

FORCE -206N

(13)

FIG : Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 206N

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS RESULT TABLE

FORCE (N)

Total

deformation(mm)

Stress (N/mm2)

Strain

1150 0.0004346 6.23 3.01e-05

992 0.0003749 5.78 2.90e-05

688 0.0002600 4.00 2.01e-05

550 0.00020787 3.20 1.608e-05

375 0.00014173 2.18 1.096e-05

270 0.00010205 1.57 7.89e-06

465 0.00017515 2.70 1.35e-05

297 0.00011225 1.73 1.42e-05

(14)

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

The experiments are done on the CNC turning machine with the following parameters:

Cutting tool material

Cemented Carbide Tool

Work piece material

EN 31Tool Steel

Feed

200mm/min, 250mm/min, 300mm/min

Cutting speed

600rpm, 1200rpm, 1800rpm, DEPTH OF CUT –

0.4mm, 0.5mm, 0.6mm

Experimental photos

FIG: CNC turning machine

(15)

FIG: CNC turnning machine feed

FIG: CNC turnning machine depth of cut

(16)

FIG: Final surface finish workpiece

FIG: Final surface finish workpiece

TABLE: Different parameters values

PROCESS PARAMETERS

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

CUTTING SPEED(rpm) 600 1200 1800

FEED RATE (mm/rev) 200 250 300

DEPTH OF CUT(mm) 0.4 0.5 0.6

TABLE: Input values for surface finish SURFACE FINISH

JOB NO.

SPINDLE SPEED (rpm)

FEED RATE (mm/min)

DEPTH OF CUT (mm)

(17)

2 600 250 0.5

3 600 300 0.6

4 1200 200 0.4

5 1200 250 0.5

6 1200 300 0.6

7 1800 200 0.4

8 1800 250 0.5

9 1800 300 0.6

TABLE: Total Different parameters values for surface finish

JOB NO. SPINDLE SPEED (rpm) FEED RATE (mm/min) DEPTH OF CUT (mm) Surface finish

(Ra)

1 600 200 0.4 0.62

2 600 250 0.5 0.78

3 600 300 0.6 0.91

4 1200 200 0.4 1.21

5 1200 250 0.5 1.46

6 1200 300 0.6 1.94

7 1800 200 0.4 2.41

8 1800 250 0.5 2.84

9 1800 300 0.6 3.12

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cutting Force Calculations

SPEED – 1800rpm

Feed = 200mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.4mm Cutting Force

Ne = (Depth X Feed X Cutting Speed X Ks) / (60

X 103 X Coefficient of Efficiency) Ne = 4.65KW

Ks = (Ne X60 X 103 X Coefficient of Efficiency)/ (Depth of cut X Feed X Cutting Speed)

Coefficient of Efficiency = 0.8

Ks = (4.65×60 X 103 X0.8)/(0.4X200 X1800)

Ks=1150N

Feed = 250mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.5mm Ks = (4.65×60 X 103 X0.8)/(0.5X250 X1800)

Ks=992N

Feed = 300mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.6 mm Ks = (4.65×60 X 103 X0.8)/(0.6X300 X1800)

Ks=688N

SPEED – 1200rpm

Feed = 200mm/min, Depth of Cut – 0.4mm Cutting Force

Ne = (Depth X Feed X Cutting Speed X Ks) / (60

X 103 X Coefficient of Efficiency) Ne = 4.65KW

Ks = (Ne X60 X 103 X Coefficient of Efficiency)/ (Depth X Feed X Cutting Speed)

Coefficient of Efficiency = 0.8

Ks = (4.65×60 X 103 X0.8)/(0.4X200 X1200)

Ks=550N

Feed = 250mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.5mm Ks = (4.65×60 X 10

3

X0.8)/(0.5X250 X1200) Ks=375N

Feed = 300mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.6mm Ks = (4.65×60 X 103 X0.8)/(0.6X300 X1200)

Ks=270N

SPEED – 600rpm

Feed = 200mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.4mm Ks = (4.65×60 X 10

3

X0.8)/(0.4X200X600) Ks=465.2N

Feed = 250mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.5mm Ks = (4.65×60 X 103 X0.8)/(0.5X250 X600)

Ks=297.6N

Feed = 200mm/min, Depth of cut – 0.6mm Ks = (4.65×60 X 10

3

(18)

S/N ratio calcution by Taguchi Method

Taguchi method stresses the importance of studying the response variation using the signal–to– noise (S/N) ratio, resulting in minimization of

quality characteristic variation due to uncontrollable parameter. The cutting force is considered as the quality characteristic with the concept of "the smaller-the-better". The S/N ratio for the smaller-the-better is:

S/N =

Where n is the number of measurements in a trial/row, in this case, n=1 and y is the measured value in a run/row. The S/N ratio values are

calculated by taking into consideration above Eqn. with the help of software Minitab 17.

The force values measured from the experiments and their corresponding S/N ratio values are listed in Table

Analysis and Discussion

Regardless of the category of the performance characteristics, a greater S/N value corresponds to a better performance. Therefore, the optimal level of the machining parameters is the level with the greatest value.

Spindle Speed

The effect of parameters spindle speed on the surface finish is shown above figure for S/N ratio. So the optimum spindle speed is 1800 rpm.

Feed Rate

The effect of parameters feed rate on the surface finish is shown above figure S/N ratio. So the optimum feed rate 250 mm/min.

Depth of Cut

The effect of parameters depth of cut on the surface finish is shown above figure for S/N ratio. So the optimum depth of cut is 0.6mm.

CONCLUSION

In this thesis an attempt to make use of Taguchi optimization technique to optimize cutting parameters during high speed turning of EN 31 tool steel using cemented carbide cutting tool.

(19)

Cutting forces, surface finish and cutting temperatures are validated experimentally.

By observing the experimental results and by

taguchi, the following conclusions can be

made

1. To minimize the cutting forces, the optimal parameters are spindle speed – 600rpm, feed rate – 200mm/min and depth of cut – 0.4mm. 2. To get better surface finish, the optimal

parameters are spindle speed – 1800rpm, feed rate – 300mm/min and depth of cut – 0.6mm.

3. To maximize material removal rate, the optimal parameters are spindle speed – 600rpm, feed rate – 200mm/min and depth of cut – 0.6mm.

4. The effects of these parameters on the cutting forces are calculated using theoretical calculations and using the forces stresses and displacements are analyzed using Ansys. 3D modeling is done in Pro/Engineer.

5. By observing the analysis results, the stress values are less than the yield stress values.

REFERENCES

[1]. Using the Response Surface Method to Optimize the Turning Process of AISI 12L14 Steel

[2]. Optimization of Process Parameters of Turning Parts: A Taguchi Approach by Neeraj Sharma, Renu Sharma

[3]. The Effect of Tool Construction and Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness and Vibration in Turning of AISI 1045 Steel Using Taguchi Method by Rogov Vladimir Aleksandrovich, Ghorbani Siamak [4]. Parametric investigation of turning process on mild steel aisi 1018 material by J. M. Gadhiya, P. J. Patel [5]. Evaluation and Optimization of Machining Parameter for turning of EN 8 steel by Vikas B. Magdum,

Vinayak R. Naik

[6]. Analyses of surface roughness by turning process using Taguchi method by S. Thamizhmanii, S. Saparudin, S. Hasan

[7]. Application of Taguchi Method for Optimizing Turning Process by the effects of Machining Parameters by Krishankant, Jatin Taneja, Mohit Bector, Rajesh Kumar

[8]. Multi-Objective Optimization of the Cutting Forces in Turning Operations Using the Grey -Based Taguchi Method by Yigit

[9]. Experimental investigation of Material removal rate in CNC turning using Taguchi method by Kamal, Anish and M.P.Garg

Figure

FIG :Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 550N
FIG :Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 270N
FIG : Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 465N
FIG :Total deformation, stress and strain under the force of 297N
+2

References

Related documents

Keywords: Endoscopic gallbladder stenting, Cholecystitis, Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration, Endoscopic

Fox, 1986 At least two nuclear gene products are specifically required for translation of a single yeast mitochondrial mRNA.. Fox, 1987 Multiple nuclear gene products

In this paper, two machine learning techniques (ANN and support vector machine, SVM) have been adopted to predict liquefaction susceptibility of soil based on the standard

The goal of this contribution is also include to proposed methodology testing adhesion zinc coating by nondestructive diagnostic method of acoustic emission (AE), which would

(2006) investigated the influence of price and brand loyalty of three frequently purchased product categories on the purchase decision process of store brands

Interestingly, fibrocavitary- form patients showed significantly higher antibody responses to three antigens than did those with the nodular bronchiectatic form, and these