Research Report No. 102
December, 1985
Part I Corn Hybrids
Part II Corn Silage
Part III Grain Sorghum
Part IV Soybeans
1985
Daryl Bowman, Assistant Professor
In Charge of Variety Testing
Department of Crop Science
North Carolina State University
Comparing Hybrids and varieties
INTRODUCTION
...
...
12
Cooperators •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 CORN HYBRIDS
Entries
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •lit • • • • • • • • • • • 6 6 Field Plot Technique
Seasonal Conditions Data
Results
8
8
9 10 Table
Table 2. 3.
Cultural Practices Soil Test Results
12
13
Tables 4 - 15.
Three, Two and One-Year Data 14 - 28
Table 16.
Table 17. CORN SILAGE
Entries
Ratings of Entries in the Gray-Leaf spot Test ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• viral Diseases
29
30
31
31
Field Plot Technique 32
Table 19. Cultural Practices 32
Seasonal Conditions Data
33
33
Results
Table 20. Soil Test Results
.
.
33
34
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GRAIN SORGHUM Entries
Test Locations
Field Plot Technique Seasonal Conditions Data
Results
39 39
4~
40
4~
4~
41 Table 25.
Table 26.
Cultural Practices Soil Test Results
42
43 Tables 27 3~. Two and One-Year Data ••••••••• 44 47 Table
SOYBEANS
31. Date of Hybrids
50% Headed for Full-Season
at Two Locations ••••••••••••••• 48 49 Entries
Test Locations Data
Seasonal Conditions Results
49 50
5~
5~
51 Table 32.
Table 33.
Cultural Practices Soil Test Results
53 54 Tables 34 45. Three, Two and One-Year Data •• 55 65
Tables 46 - 48. Three, Two and One Year Data on Flowering and Pod Maturity Dates
by Maturity Groups •••••••••••• 66 69
Table 49. Table 5~.
Oil Percentage Analyses and Seed Size
Characteristics 71
7~
PERFORMANCE OF CORN HYBRIDS, CORN SILAGE, GRAIN SORGHUM AND SOYBEANS IN NORTH CAROLINA
INTRODUCTION
with the large number of commercially available and prospec-tive hybrids and varieties of corn, grain sorghum, and soybeans, i t becomes difficult for growers to select a superior variety suited for their particular area of the state and their individual farming operations. To make this decision, the growers need up-to-date, unbiased, reliable information. The Official Variety Testing Program, through this report, seeks to provide that type of information.!!
The first section of this report is concerned with corn hybrids in all production areas of the state. The second section deals with corn silage. The third section includes data on grain sorghum. The fourth section covers data on soybeans. Each part is complete in that it contains information on experimental procedure, locations of the tests, a discussion of the data for
1985,~
as well as summary tables for the past two and three years.!/The Official Variety Testing Program recognizes the cooperative spirit and civic-minded service rendered by the farmers who have furnished, prepared, and cultivated the land for these trials. Research technicians,
Ray Adams, Dwight Parrish, and G. C. Oliver, assisted in conducting these tests. Carey Parsons prepared the text for this bulletin.
2
It is hoped that the organization of this bulletin will provide data in a complete form to those interested in the various crops.
Growers are cautioned against making varietal selection decisions based on an individual location in anyone year. True varietal performance may have been masked by the unusual weather conditions experienced at anyone location or anyone growing season.
Comparing Hybrids and varieties
Performance of a hybrid or variety cannot be tested with absolute precision. Even though the tests are conducted in a uniform manner, as much as possible, uncontrollable variability exists among experimental plots due to soil type, fertility, moisture, insects, diseases, and other sources of variation. Because this variability exists, statistics are used as a tool to determine differences among hybrids and varieties. The size of difference among hybrids or varieties which may have been due to chance variation is listed in each table as the L.S.D. (least significant difference) and those hybrids or varieties which do not differ by more than the L.S.D. are statistically not different. Those hybrids or varieties that do differ by more than the L.S.D. are statistically different. The Bayes L.S.D. at the K-ratio of 50
(approximately .10 level of probability) was used.
well the true mean was estimated. The formula for the s.e. is the
square root of the error variance divided by the square root of the
number of replications. The error degrees of freedom (Error d.f.)
used to test varieties or hybrids are listed along with the mean of
the test.
Hybrid or varietal performance may appear inconsistent among
locations within an area or among years in a particular area, thus
it is important for the reader to examine results from more than
one location within an area or more than one year at a particular
area to obtain a more accurate picture of relative hybrid or
varietal performance. An effort has been made to facilitate
comparisons among locations and across years in this report.
The hybrids or varieties which do not yield significantly less
than the highest yielder are denoted by an asterisk (*) next to their yields; the highest yielder is denoted by a double asterisk
(**) next to their yield. The relative performance of a hybrid or variety across locations within an area can be easily evaluated by
going across the table; those hybrids or varieties which are most
frequently marked by an asterisk would be highly desirable. Other
agronomic characteristics may be as equally important as yield.
It is suggested that the grower plant a small number of acres
in a new variety when first determining if i t is adapted to his
4
COOPERATORS 1985 Corn
Yadkin County, Bobby L. Smith, Route 1, Box 162, Boonville, NC, Agricultural Extension Chairman, Jack Loudermilk, cooperating.
Pitt County, W. C. Moore, Route 1, Bethel, NC., Agricul-tural Extension Agent, Mitch Smith, cooperating Johnston County, San Wood Farms, Route 2, Four Oaks, NC.
Agricultural Extension Agent, Eric Spaulding, cooperating.
Columbus County, Ralph Pridgen, Route 5, Whiteville, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent, Robert Shaw, cooperating. Sampson County, Fred Cumbo, Superintendent, Horticultural
Research Station, Clinton, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent, Tommy Glover, cooperating.
Rowan County, Piedmont Research Station, Salisbury, NC, Billy Ayscue, Superintendent, and Agricultural Extension Agent, Kevin Fisher, cooperating. Chowan County, Robert L. Bunch, Route 2, Edenton, NC,
County Extension Chairman, J. Michael Williams, cooperating.
Washington County, John Smith, Superintendent, Tidewater Research Station, Plymouth, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent, Al Hight, cooperating.
Corn Silage
Haywood County, Mountain Research Station, J. R. Edwards, Superintendent, waynesville, NC, County Extension Chairman, H. E. McCall, cooperating.
Rowan County, Billy Ayscue, Superintendent, Piedmont Research Station, Salisbury, NC and Agricultural Extension Agent, Kevin Fisher, cooperating.
Grain Sorghum
Anson County, Ronnie Morgan, Route 1, Box 73, Morvin, NC, Agricultural Extenson Agent, David Dycus, cooperating. Rowan County, Billy Ayscue, Superintendent, Piedmont
Research Station, Salisbury, NC and Agricultural Extension Agent, Kevin Fisher, cooperating. Stanly County, Nevin Honeycutt, Oakboro, NC, County
Extension Chairman, J. Frank Simpson, cooperating. Washington County, John Smith, Superintendent, Tidewater
Soybeans
Halifax County, James A. Davis, Route 1, Box 207, Palmyra, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent, Haywood Harrell, cooperating.
Rowan County, George Anderson & Sons, Inc., Route 1, Box 88, Mt. Ulla, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent,
Kevin Fisher, cooperating.
Robeson County, Ronald Strickland, Route 3, Maxton, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent, Everett Davis, cooperating.
Washington County, J. W. Smith, Superintendent, Tidewater Research Station, Plymouth, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent, Al Hight, cooperating.
Lenoir County, Sandy Barnes, Superintendent, Lower Coastal Plain Tobacco Research Station, Kinston, NC, Agric-ultural Extension Chairman, Johnnie Jones, cooperating.
Late Tests After Small Grain Johnston County, Ben Youngblood, Route 3, Box l05B,
Smithfield, NC, Agricultural Extension Agent, Eric Spaulding, cooperating.
Pasquotank County, Charles and Wesley Moore, Route 2,
Box 782, Elizabeth City, NC, County Extension Chairman, Donald Baker, cooperating.
Rowan County, Billy Ayscue, Superintendent, Piedmont Research Station, Salisbury, NC, and Agricultural Extension Agent, Kevin Fisher, cooperating.
Edgecombe County, Bert Pitt, Route 1, Box 180, Macclesfield, NC, County Extension Agent, Curtis D. Fountain,
6
CORN HYBRIDS
The performance of various corn hybrids in different areas of the state depends on their adaptation to the environmental
conditions within the area. The performance of hybrids across the state of North Carolina is reported in this bulletin.
Entries: Any individual or firm may make application for having hybrids tested. A fee is charged on an entry basis. Personnel of the testing program may also include entries about which further information is desired.
Early in January each year~ rules governing the tests for the ensuing year are distributed to all previous participants and to those who make iquiry.
Agencies or individuals entering hybrids in the Official Variety Tests were requested to designate the population and maturity range desired. Because of this, some hybrids may not
appear to be in the correct maturity group.
Agencies sponsoring entries in the 1985 tests are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Name, contact person, and address of sponsoring agencies in the 1985 North Carolina Corn Performance Trials along with designation used to identify the hybrids.
Name and Contact Person AgraTech Seeds, Inc. Bobby Jones
Agrow Seed Company Neil Zimmer
Address P. O. Box 644 Ashburn, GA 31714 7000 Portage Road Kalamazoo, MI 49001
Hybrid Designation AgraTech GK
Table 1. (Continued) Name and
Contact Person
Baldridge Seed Co., Inc. Richard Baldridge
Coker's Pedigreed Seed Company Richard Gettys
Columbiana Seed Company John Naber
DeKalb-Pfizer Genetics
Delta & Pine Land Co. Tom Wofford
FCX, Inc. Marvin Godfrey
Funk's Seed International Ron Walberg
Jacques Seed Company Joe Waldo
McCurdy Seed Company Leroy McCurdy
Northrup King Company Myron Fountain
N. C. State University Paul Sisco
Daryl Bowman PAG Seeds
J. Stuart Carney Paymaster Seeds John Harker Pioneer Hi-Bred
International, Inc. Paul Rodgers
Pfister Hybrid Seed Co. Richard Bergquist
Hybrid
Address Designation
P. O. Box 99 Baldridge
Cherry Fork, OH 45618
P. O. Box 34~ Coker
Hartsville, SC 2955~
Eldred, IL 62~27 Golden Harvest
3l~0 Sycamore Road DeKalb-Pfizer DeKalb, IL 6~115
12~~ Herring Avenue Deltapine Box 1118
Wilson, NC 27893
P. O. Box 2419 FCX
Raleigh, NC 27602
P. O. Box 2911 Funk's, RA Bloomington, IL 61701
720 St. Croix Jacques
Prescott, WI 54021
East Main Street McCurdy Fremont, Iowa 52561
2114 Cowper Drive NK, NK's McNair Raleigh, NC 27~~8
37~9 Hillsborough St. NC Raleigh, NC 27607
P. O. Box 9480 P-A-G
Minneapolis, MN 5544~
P. O. Box 9493 Paymaster Minneapolis, MN 5544~
l00~ W. Jefferson St. Pioneer Tipton, IN 46~72
8
Table 1. (Continued) Name and
Contact Person USS Agri-Chemica1s J. J. Humphreys
watson Seed Farms, Inc. George Watson
Hybrid
Address Designation
P. O. Box 1683 USS
Atlanta, GA 30301
Box 1099 Watson
Rocky Mount, NC 27801
Field Plot Technique: Eight tests were located across the state. The various locations are shown in Figure 1. Ear1y-maturi~g
corn hybrids (less than 110 days to maturity) are included in six tests in the Coastal Plain and Tidewater areas of the state. The medium-maturing (approximately 110 to 120 days to maturity) and the late-maturing (over 120 days to maturity) hybrids are included in all eight locations. It is important to remember that these are loose groupings, i.e. some hybrids may easily fit into either of two maturity groups due to it being on the borderline. Table 2 lists the cultural practices used and Table 3 lists the soil test results.
In field design a lattice was used. Each plot consisted of four rows 23 feet long with a 40, 38, or 36" row width. The center two rows were harvested for yield. Alley width was five feet.
In 1985, all tests were planted to a stand at 110% of the desired plant population.
late August delayed harvest and moisture readings at harvest reflect this delay.
Rainfall data at six locations reveal the type of season experienced in 1985.
Rainfall (Inches) Location
by County April May June July August
Columbus 0.90 2.20 3.50 6.00 3.90
Johnston 1.45 1.40 4.40 5.05 2.95
McDowell 0.50 1.80 6.10 8.00 1.30
pitt 5.20 7.50 3.80 2.70 0.50
Sampson 1.43 2.34 2.17 8.79 5.95
Washington 0.67 1.10 4.48 5.58 4.07
Lenoir 1.13 5.35 5.60 4.44 3.45
Corn borer damage was more extensive in 1985 than had been experienced in years past. Northern corn leaf blight was evident at the Yadkin County test site. The McDowell County test site was specifically chosen for its past history of gray leaf spot and the disease was evident by mid-July; conditions became excellent for rating corn hybrids for their resistance to this disease. The Rowan County test was discarded due to a heavy infestation of Johnsongrass.
10
being 0-9 and 9 being 90-99% of leaves covered with the disease. Stand counts were reported in plants/acre. As a general indicator of seedling vigor, all corn hybrids were planted March 13 at one location and percent desired stand was later calculated.
Results: Seedling vigor ratings are listed in Tables 4, 5, and 6 along with their germination data. Germination was determined at the NCDA Seed Laboratory under supervision of Mr. George Spain. Yield and performance data for the early maturing hybrids are shown in Tables 7, 8, and 9. Funk's G-4522 leads the three and two year average in yield (Table 7). The number of locations reveals the number of data points that went into that particular average. Funk's G-4522 is also the yield leader for 1985 across locations and was followed closely by four other hybrids (Tables 8 and 9). The low average yields for Johnston and Sampson Counties are a result of the dry summer.
For the medium maturing group, two McCurdy hybrids lead the group for yield after three years; McCurdy 7676 is also the two year yield leader (Table 10). Tables 11 and 12 reveal 1985 data where 64 hybrids were entered.
Three Pioneer hybrids lead the late-maturing hybrids after three years (Table 13) and two of those three also have the highest two year averages. Again, Pioneer 3165 and Pioneer 3055 are the yield leaders in 1985 across all locations (Table 14 and 15).
realized that certain hybrids may yield better under gray leaf spot infestation than those hybrids with higher levels of resistance. This test was conducted on Ronnie Huskins' Farm in McDowell County; Mario Deluca, County Extension Agent, cooperated in this research.
Table 2. Cultural practices used at each corn test location - 1985.
Date Date
Location Fertilizer Topdressing of of Soil
by County Lbs/A and Grade Lbs N/A Planting H.arvest Type
Columbus 400 150 April 1 September 4
5-10-30
Pitt 400 130 April 5 September 5 Exum fine sandy
5-5-25 loam
Johnst·on 200 150 April 4 August 29 Norfolk sandy
0-0-60 loam
f-I
Sampson 400 155 April 2 September 3 Goldsboro loamy tv
5-10-30 sand
Washington 233 180 April 10 September 10 Portsmouth sandy
0-0-60 loam
Chowan
Yadkin
400 5-10-30
500 10-20-20
150
100
April 9
April 18
September 9
September 27
Tomotley fine sandy loam
Table 3. Soil tes.t .r.es.u.1.t.s., c.orn. - .1985.
Location
by County HM%
w-v
CEC BS % Ac pH P-I K-I C.a. % Mg % Mn.-I Zn.-I Cu-IColumbus 1.0 1.26 4.5 91 .4 6.2 33 60 58.0 26.3 16 33 20
Johnston 1.0 1.15 3.4 76 .8 5.7 80 68 53.3 13.0 120 85 54
Pitt 1.3 1.30 6.4 81 1.2 6.2 166 74 56.5 18.8 40 33 82
...
w
Sampson 2.3 1.13 7.2 82 1.6 5.7 24 42 39.2 35.5 38 79 82
Chowan .4 1.12 5.6 93 .4 6.3 128 68 75.0 11.8 85 91 258
Washington 3.5 1.13 8.6 86 1.2 6.1 92 78 59.2 22.3 26 217 62
Table 4 ..
14
Analysis of Percent Desired1Jtand for Early-Maturing Corn Hybrids Planted
Early.-% Desired %
Brand Hybrid Stand Germination
Pioneer 3540 93 95
AgriTech GK-750 92 98
Coker 8601 90 97
DP X8262 88 93
AgriTech GK-850 88 95
FCX 717 87 95
DeKalb-Pfizer DK672 87 97
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK656 86 92
AgriTech GK-695 85 97
FCX 758 85 92
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK636 84 92
Funk's G-4522 84 98
Jacques 7820 84 97
Coker 8575 83 98
DeKalb-Pfizer Tl100 83 95
Pioneer 3358 83 94
P-A-G SX267 82 97
NK PX9527 82 99
USS 7005 80 90
Pioneer 3389 79 97
RA 1502 79 95
P-A-G SX297 78 94
FCX 767 76 97
DP X4l5l 67 91
watson 412 65 97
RA 1404 61
Mean 82
c,v .
(%)B.L.S.D. (K-50) s.e.
Error d.f.
!/Planted March 13 at Clinton, NC.
7.1
8
Table 5. Analysis of Percent Desired
1ttand for Medium-Maturing Corn Hybrids Planted
Ear1y.-% Desired %
Brand Hybrid Stand Germination
Coker 8625 93 96
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK 748 91 97
Funk's G-4614 91 98
P-A-G SX352 91 98
Pioneer 332~ 91 99
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK689 9~ 99
McCurdy 8172 9~ 96
P-A-G SX 379 9~ 94
USS 1218 89 97
McCurdy 7384 88 92
McCurdy NK Asgrow O's Gold watson NK McCurdy Watson
Golden Har ve st;
Pioneer Jacques Jacques Paymaster Funk's Funk's FCX Watson McCurdy Jacques USS 7372 PX9581 RX777 257~ 414A PX 87 78~~ 413A H-2686A 3378 79~~ 81~~ 79~~ G-4733 G-4734 835 453-A 84AA 84~~ 7~6 88 87 87 86 86 85 85 85 84 84 83 83 83 83 83 82 82 81 81 81 97 94 96 92 9~ 89 95 98 94 97 94 92 95 98 98 98 91 89 86 91
Coker 21 81 93
NC 85 81 83
P-A-G SX383 80 92
McCurdy 7676 8~ 91
Watson 42~ 79 84
Asgrow RX 892 79 98
Watson 414 78 90
FCX 808 78 91
McCurdy 7711 77 98
16 Table 5. (Continued.)
% Desired %
Brand Hybrid Stand Germination
DP X4436 76 97
O's Gold 6882 76 85
Pioneer 3184 76 96
watson 418 72 99
Coker 8707 71 99
watson 416A 71 88
Golden Harvest H-2675 70 94
Coker 19A 70 84
USS 7001 70 86
Asgrow RX 788 69 96
USS 820 66 92
Baldridge 58 62 86
Coker 8680 62 81
watson 415 62 94
FCX 811 58 80
NK PX79 58 95
DP X2814 57 92
Watson 417 45 91
Mean
C. V. (%)
B.L.S.D. (K-50) s.e.
Error d.f.
!/P1anted March 13 at Clinton, Ne.
78 13.4 16
Table 6. Analysis of Percent Desired
1ttand for Late-Maturing Corn Hybrids Planted
Early.-% Desired %
Brand Hybrid Stand Germination
Pioneer 3055 88 97
NK PX95 85 96
Coker 8905 83 94
pioneer 3165 83 98
AgriTech GK925 83 96
FCX 915 82 99
FCX 955 81 98
DeKalb-Pfizer DK789 79 95
AgriTech GK-900 77 86
Paymaster 8951 77 97
USS 9001 76 91
Watson 421 74 93
FCX 905 73 99
Paymaster 8990 73 95
Baldridge 94A 72 93
Jacques JX247 68 88
Baldridge 54A 66 86
Watson 572 65 98
USS 2020 64 92
NK PX 508 64 90
FCX 929W 52 88
Pioneer 3192 47 97
Mean 73
C.v.
(%)B.L.S.D. (K-50) s.e.
Error d.f.
~/Planted
March 13 at Clinton, NC.14.7 17
18
TABLE 7. CATA WJTI3INED OVER lOCATIONS
FOR FARLY~·ATURING HYBRIDS.
THREE YEAR AVERAGE - 1983, 1984, 1985
liYBL'UD OR YIElD lvOISlUHE WOOING EAR Iff PlANT NUMBER OF
BAAL'ID-HYBRID BUS/A % IN FOPUIATION LOCATlct~S
FU~K'S G-4522 115 .156 4 39 18
PIONEER HYBfaD 3389 I I I .154 2 36 18
DEKALB-PFIZER DK 656 106 .148 4 40 18
DEKALB-PFIZEf{ T1I00 105 .150 2 31 18
RA 1404 104 .152 2 32 14
AGRATECH GK-695 102 .146 3 37 18
FCX 758 95 .156 5 40 18
'IWOYEAR AVERAGE - 1984, 1985
FTh,iKIS G-4522 125 .144- 3 38 25921 11
DEKALB-PFlZER T1100 117 .139 1 32 25213 11
PIONEER HYBRID 3389 116 .145 2 36 25506 11
AGRATEQi GK-750 115 .138 2 43 25277 11
DEKALB-PFIZER DK 656 114 .141 4 40 25643 11
AGHATECH GK~95 113 .134 4 36 25870 11
CDKER 8575 I I I .144 2 36 24866 11
RA 1404 108 .138 2 34 24153 11
FCX 758 103 .144 5 41 22744 11
P-A-G SX267 103 .135 5 37 26416 11
TABLE 8. DATA CDr-lBTh"'ED OVER IOCATICNS
FOR FARLY MATURING HYBRIDS-1985.
HYBRID OR YIELD IvDISIURE LOOO:rnG FAR HI' PIAl-lr
BRAND-HYBRID BUS/A % IN POPUlATION
FUNK'S G-4522 130 .155 3 40 27392
+NC 107 128 .153 2 41 29119
COKBR 8601 125 .149 1 37 27741
NC 101 123 .154 3 43 27392
NC 108 122 .157
"
~ 43 29103PIONEER HYBRID 3389 119 .155 1 40 26445 DEKALB-PFIZER T1100 119 .148 1 36 25382
AGAATECH GK-850 119 .160 4 44 26345
DEKALB-PF'IZERDK 672 118 .153 2 43 25315
AGRATECH GK-750 118 .148 2 43 26262
NK PX9527 117 .145 2 39 30614
DEKALB-PFIZER OK 636 117 .151 2 42 27275
COt~H. 8575 117 .148 1 39 26694
RA 1502 117 .156 3 43 27060
+DPX 8262 116 .154 3 45 25016
AGfATECH GK-695 115 .145 3 38 26960
+DPX4151 115 .152 1 42 21810
DEKALB-PFIZER DK 656 114 .148 4 46 25747
uss
7005 114 .149 2 37 24751JACCUES 7820 113 .148 1 39 27176
AA 1404 110 .145 2 38 23455
PIONEER HYBRID 3358 109 .152 1 39 24535
FCX 758 108 .152 6 44 24601
P-A-G SX267 106 .145 4 42 25182
PIONEER HRBRID 3540 104 .144 1 38 26079
FCX 717 104 .151 4 42 25448
WATSON 412 104 .138 1 33 24535
FCX 767 102 .153 4 41 25731
P-A-G SX297 100 .136 3 35 25764
20
Table 9. Individual location data for early maturing hybrids - 1985. Hybrid or Wash-
Samp-Brand-Hybrid ington son Johnston pitt Chowan Columbus Mean Funk's G-4522 158* 101** 92* 173* 137** 120* 130** +NC 107 155* 90* 92* 173* 133* 124** 128*
Coker 8601 163** 87* 89* 174* 127* 110* 125* +NC 101 158* 78* 93* 166* 128* 115* 123* +NC 108 152* 75* 94* 178** 127* 105* 122* Pioneer Hybrid 3389 144 86* 93* 156 128* 111* 119 DeKa1b-Pfizer T1100 152* 55 94* 171* 131* 112* 119
~
-AgraTech GK-850 160* 76* 83* 169* 124* 101* 119 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK 672 147* 81* 94* 154 126* 107* 118 AgraTech GK-750 138 72* 88* 173* 128* 106* 118 NK PX9527 140 64 83* 168* 134* 115* 117 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK 636 146* 68* 93* 171* 126* 100* 117 Coker 8575 148* 72* 90* 169* 124* 101* 117
RA 1502 163** 76* 74 141 126* 123* 117
+DPX 8262 159* 74* 78 150 137** 100* 116
---AgraTech GK-695 162* 75* 84* 157 131* 82* 115
+DPX 4151 133 93* 87* 149 108 121* 115
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK 656 132 54 101** 149 128* 121* 114
USS 7005 149* 80* 73 158 116 107* 114
Jacques 7820 139 68* 93* 159 116 105* 113
RA 1404 145* 61 83* 152 121* 99* 110
Pioneer Hybrid 3358 139 76* 75 152 126* 89* 109
---FCX 758 140 62 83* 152 118 94* 108
P-A-G SX267 132 73* 82* 144 119* 87* 106 Pioneer Hybrid 3540 130 65 69 157 113 92* 104
FCX 717 119 100* 73 135 95 101* 104
Watson 412 117 63 77 160 102 101* 104
FCX 767 115 66 83* 135 113 103* 102
P-A-G SX297 130 59 72 150 113 75* 100
---Mean 148 73 85 158 122 104 114
C.V (%) 8.9 23.2 13.5 7.4 9.0 19.0 8.4
B.L.S.D. (K-50) 18 33 22 17 18 NS 10
s.e. (x) 7.0 9.9 6.6 6.7 6.1 11.2 3.9
Error d.f. 43 43 43 43 43 43 145
+Experimenta1. Seed of this hybrid may or may not be available in 1986 and also may have a different designation.
**Highest yielder.
'fABLE 10. DA.TA aMBINED OVER IDCATICNS
FOR MEDIUM t-1A'IURING HYBRIDS.
lliREEYEAA AVERAGE - 1983, 1984, 1985
HYBRID OR YIELD M)ISTURE WOOING FARar PLANT NUMBER OF BRAND-HYBRID BUS/A % IN FOPUIATICN lOCATIOOS
MCCURDY7676 126 .160 6 45 16
l1CCURDY7800 122 .175 5 42 16
o •S GOLD 5509 118 .178 3 40 16
NCCURDY 8172 115 .180 4 43 21
O'S GOID 2570 114 .160 7 46 16
NK PX9581 110 .176 4 40 21
ASGROl\TFXl77 107 .169 3 41 19
HK PX87 106 .168 3 43 18
JAC<.lJFS 8400 105 .177 6 43 24
USS 7001 104 .156 6 43 16
PIQl\J"EER HRBRID 3184 103 .180 3 38 21
l-n;uRDY 84M 102 .178 6 43 24
PI~~HYBRID 3320 101 .173 4 41 24 FUlli:IS G-4733 101 .192 3 40 24
FlNK'S G-4734 100 .183 4 44 21
11KPX79 98 .160 5 44 16
COKER 21 96 .186 4 43 24
CDKER 19A 95 .173 6 44 24
FCX 808 94 .163 4 39 18
'IWO YEAR AVERAGE - 1984, 1985
M:X:UHDY 7676 128 .153 5 45 22897 13 DEKALB-PFIZER DK689 127 .167 2 38 26905 13 lvlOCURDY 7800 126 .164 6 43 23392 13
t.a:URDY8172 126 .170 4 42 21812 13 PIONlillR HYBRID 3320 125 .159 5 40 25896 13 OIS GOLD 2570 123 .153 5 45 22020 13
FU~KISG-4733 123 .175 2 40 22802 13
NK PX9581 123 .159 5 42 26451 13 FU1KIS G-4734 121 .176 3 39 22672 13 01
S GOLD 5509 121 .167 3 42 22989 13 JACQJES 8400 121 .165 5 43 23035 13 PIONEER HYBRID 3378 119 .149 1 36 24438 13
r-.jXURDY 84M 119 .163 5 41 24051 13
NK PX87 117 .165 4 42 25096 13
PIONEER HRBRID 3184 116 .172 3 37 22991 13 ASGRO\\1 FX777 116 .155 2 38 23746 13 P-A-G SX352 116 .151 5 42 25431 13
OOKER 21 116 .169 4 40 23189 13
PAYMASTER 7990 113 .155 3 38 25063 13
USS 7001 112 .150 5 40 24248 13
COKER 19A 108 .157 5 42 23855 13
NK PX79 106 .154 5 41 24875 13
USS 1218 104 .160 5 37 25658 13
22
TABlE 11. ffiTA CDNBINED OVERLOCATIa.'JS
FORIV1EDIUN r-1A'IURING HYBRIDS-1985.
HYBRID OR YIELD r-DISTURE WOOING FARHI' PLANT
BRAND-HYBRID BoolA % IN POPUlATION iNC 103 124 .157 3 44 26084
r-tCCURDY 8172 123 .165 4 44 21699 -+NC 102' 122 .159 4 43 26255
~O:URDY 7676 122 .152 5 46 21827
PI01~HYBRID 3320 122 .156 2 42 25856
l'O::URDY 7711 120 .157 1 41 23194 PIONEER HYBRID 3378 119 .148 1 39 24717 COI<ER 8625 119 .149 2 41 27095 OIS GOLD 2570 119 .150 5 46 21927 \-2ATSON 418 119 .154 3 43 25500 MX:URDY 7800 118 .159 3 44 22325 DEKALB-PFIZER DK689 117 .161 2 43 27992 +NC 109 116 .157 5 43 24760
JACClJES 8400 116 .159 5 45 23536
GOLDEL~ HARVEST H-2686 116 .159 4 45 21428 r-rcURDY 7384 116 .146 4 44 21727 +DPX 4436 115 .157 2 42 23621
JACQJES 8100 115 .148 5 44 24717 NK PX9581 19..5 .157 6 41 26597 P-A-G SX383 114 .159 3 45 23222
ASGROWPJG77 114 .153 1 41 24319 iUSS706 114 .152 2 39 23222 FlNKIS G-4614 114 .161 3 41 25002 WATSON 420 113 .161 5 46 22710 P-A-G SX379 113 .162 2 46 24803
\~SON 413A 113 .157 3 43 23892
l-'X:X:URDY 7372 113 .148 5 43 22624 01
S GOLD 5509 113 .163 3 43 22781 +DPX 2814 113 .157 2 42 24005 FCX 835 113 .161 1 39 22938 FlNK'S G-4734 113 .174 2 42 22397 P-A-G SX352 113 .147 7 44- 24703 PIONEER HRBRID 3184 112 .169 2 37 22582 DEKALB-PFIZER DK 748 112 .163 2 42 26910 BALDRIDGE 58 112 .147 2 39 22667 \'JATSON 453A 112 .160 5 38 24689 +NC 110 III .158 3 40 25073 FGJ"K IS G-4733 III .174 2 42 22667 OOLDEN HARVEb"T H-2675 III .155 5 43 21443 FCX 811 III .154 4 40 22852 ASGROW RX 892 110 .156 2 43 22995 01
TABLE 11. (CCNl'INUED) DATA CCM3INED OVER LCrATIrnS FOR MEDIUM MAIDRING HYBRIDS-1985.
HYBRID OR YIEID IDIS'IURE IDDGING EARHr PIAN!'
BRAND-HYBRID BUS/A %
rn
POPUIATICN+Uss 820 105 .148 3 39 23194
N"K: PX79 105 .154 3 42 25529
WATSON 416A 105 .155 2 36 23621
JACOJES 7900 105 .145 7 44- 25102
COKER 8707 105 .153 2 32 27223
COKER 19A 103 .154 5 44 25856
fNC 85 102 .154 1 35 23422
CDKER 8680 101 .160 1 37 22938
WATSON 417 101 .158 3 43 19307
USS 1218 99 .157 5 37 25443
FCX 808 98 .158 2 37 25686
\VATSOl:~ 414A 97 .148 6 42 24760
24
Table 12. Individual location data for medium maturing hybrids - 1985. Hybrid or Wash-
Samp-Brand-Hybrid ington son Johnston pitt Chowan Columbus Yadkin Mean +NC 103 163* 61* 99* 152 ." 139** 101* 155* 124** McCurdy 8172 156* 69* 110** 157* 119 102* 147* 123* +NC 102 163 * 59* 109* 163* 124* 78* 159** 122* McCurdy 7676 156* 77* 103* 159* 133* 87* 138* 122* Pioner Hybrid 3320 160* 56 100* 168* 111 97* 158* 122* McCurdy 7711 162* 82** 84* 133 123* 114* 142* 120* Pioneer Hybrid 3378 142 63* 92* 172** 116 108* 143* 119* Coker 8625 153* 69* 92* 158* 125* 96* 140* 119* O's Gold 2570 156* 59* 103* 149* 122* 97* 148* 119* watson 418 159* 58 100* 148* 125* 90* 150* 119* McCurdy 7800 160* 69* 105* 149* 125* 76* 144* 118*
---DeKa1b-Pfizer DK689 156* 45 102* 153* 129* 86* 148* 117* +NC 109 161* 62* 99* 141* 118 83* 149* 116* Jacques 8400 145 70* 97* 154* 108 94* 144* 116* Golden Harvest H-2686A 155* 64 102* 144* 136* 83* 126 116* McCurdy 7384 142 58 107* 152* 119 90* 142* 116* +DPX 4436 159* 68* 95* 150* 129* 95* 109 115* Jacques 8100 159* 65* 91 144* 134* 65 146* 115* NK PX9581 159* 50 97* 152* 120 77* 149* 115* P-A-G SX383 156* 69* 68 138* 118 100* 150* 114 Asgrow RX777 151* 65* 81 144* 109 111* 139* 114
---USS 706 145 65* 93* 139* 118 97* 140* 114 Funk's G-4614 150* 42 87 146* 114 116** 141* 114 watson 420 148 62* 78 158* 113 82* 154* 113 P-A-G SX379 170** 45 85 142* 118 95* 138* 113 Watson 413A 147 59* 88 159* 116 74* 149* 113 McCurdy 7372 156* 58 100* 142* 124* 70 143* 113 O's Gold 5509 167* 46 92* 137* 130* 82* 137* 113 +DPX 2814 161* 56 73 161* 109 106* 125 113 FCX 835 144 58 90 136* 134* 87* 140* 113 Funk's G-4734 159* 55 101* 146* 122* 78* 127 113
---P-A-G SX352 144 52 85 146* 123* 92* 145* 113 Pioneer Hybrid 3184 131 62* 101* 155* 110 79* 146* 112 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK 748 155* 67* 72 149* 122* 91* 128 112 Baldridge 58 141 67* 89 148* 122* 89* 128 112 Watson 453A 147 54 85 143* 112 89* 154* 112 +NC 110 156* 59* 97* 139* 117 81* 132 111 Funk's G-4733 161* 58 77 147* 126* 84* 124 111 Golden Harvest H-2675 149* 65* 95* 140* 112 97* 119 111 FCX 811 136 55 96* 130 114 89* 153* 111 Asgrow RX 892 146 52 68 151* 113 96* 149* 110
---Table 12. (Continued)
Hybrid or Wash-
Samp-Brand-Hybrid ington son Johnston pitt Chowan Columbus Yadkin Mean O's Gold 6882 149* 44 89 140* 114 105* 129 110 Paymaster 7990 155* 48 91 129 107 87* 153* 110 watson 414 137 55 95* 150* 110 87* 134 110 Watson 415 153* 48 88 138* 110 94* 136* 110 NK PX87 154* 40 78 151* 116 95* 123 108 USS 7001 143 45 70 137* 120 100* 142* 108 Coker 21 158* 44 83 149* 111 74* 133 107 McCurdy 84AA 141 59* 84 136* 120 79* 132 107 Asgrow RX788 145 54 84 142* 104 86* 129 106
USS 820 146 50 86 135* 108 85* 129 105
---NK PX79 139 38 74 151* 105 86* 144* 105 Watson 416A 131 51 76 136* 113 91* 135 105 Jacques 7900 135 43 84 151* 117 62 140* 105 Coker 8707 132 53 93* 140* 99 80* 136* 105 Coker 19A 138 62* 69 138* 115 74* 124 103
+NC 85 115 43 85 131 104 98* 137* 102
Coker 8680 147 48 70 138* 90 83* 136* 101 Watson 417 137 54 92* 132 93 91* 108 101
USS 1218 138 50 73 145* 86 75* 127 99
FCX 808 139 47 70 120 97 83* 134 98
Watson 414A 147 35 76 120 96 68 139* 97
---Mean 150 56 89 145 116 89 139 111
C.V. (%) 8.2 24.6 13.7 11.0 9.7 20.6 9.4 8.6
B.L.S.D. (K-50) 21 23 18 38 17 43 23 9
s.e. (x) 7.1 7.9 6.9 9.1 6.5 10.4 7.3 3.6 Error d.f. 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 378
+Experimental. Seed of these hybrids may or may not be available in 1986 and may have a different designation.
**Highest yielder.
26
TABLE 13. mTA (DNBINED OVER LOCATIONS
FOR LATE NATURING HYBRIDS.
THREEYEAR AVERAGE - 1983, 1984, 1985
HYBRID OR YIELD r-DISTURE WOOING FAR HT PLANT NUMBER OF BRAND-HYBRID BUS/A % IN POPUIATION LCX~A'rI(]:\1S
PIONEER HYBRID 3055 119 .186 3 46 17
PIONEER HYBRID 3165 117 .184 3 43 20
PIONEER HYBRID 3192 108 .184 2 41 16
USS 2020 104 .182 4 45 20
FCX 905 104 .184 5 44 16
NK PX95 103 .187 5 48 20
JACO,Jlli JX247 103 .181 5 46 20
DEKALB-PFIZER DK789 102 .194 1 45 20
FCX 92~~ 93 .187 8 45 16
'!WO YLAR AVERAGL - 1984, 1985
PI~~ HYBRID 3165 137 .177 1 39 25736 13
PIOllEER HYBRID 3055 126 .186 4 46 24169 13
NK PX95 123 .182 2 41 23427 13
PIONEER HYBRID 3192 119 .175 1 39 24927 13
USS 9001 118 .168 3 38 26320 13
USS 2020 118 .173 3 38 23556 13
JACClJES JX247 117 .172 4 39 23148 13
FCX 905 115 .171 4 40 22380 13
DEKALB-PFIZER DK789 115 .188 1 42 25161 13
'll\BLE 1-4. fll\'I'A CDHBINED OVERlOCATIOOS FOR lATE NA'IURING HYBIUDS-1985.
HYBIUD OR YIELD ~DISIURE LODGING FARHr PI.M."'T
BRAND-HYEHID BUS/A % lli POPUIATION
PI~~ I~D 3165 132 .172 0 43 25486
PIOt~{ HYBRID 3055 124 .183 2 45 24276
+NC 106 123 .179 1 43 26212
AGRATEOi GK-900 121 .165 4 44 22083
NK PX95 121 .182 2 45 23493
WATSON 421 121 .163 1 42 24091
US$ 9001 120 .162 1 37 26369
JACClJES JX247 117 .167 3 44 23906
FCX 915 115 .169 3 46 24760
PIONEER HYBRID 3192 114 .174 1 38 25073
AGRATECH GK-925 114 .169 2 45 22368
USS 2020 114 .170 3 43 23080
PAYMASTER 8951 113 .171 3 44- 24717
FCX 905 113 .168 3 43, 24091
iNC 104 112 .174 3 44 22895
COKER 8905 I I I .209 1 49 24091
BALDRIOOE 94A 110 .161 1 41 25799
iNC 105 110 .177 2 44 22667
BALDRIIXiE 54A 109 .166 3 44 24148
WATSON 572 100 .160 4 44 24988
DEI\ALB-PFIZER DK789 108 .186 1 44 26583
PAWJASTlli 8990 106 .164 3 45 23948
FCX 955 100 .169 3 45 25899
b.1J< PX508 100 .210 2 50 21969
FCX 929W 94 .169 6 46 18994
Table 15.
28
Individual location data for late maturing hybrids - 1985. Hybrid or
Brand-Hybrid
Wash-
Samp-ington son Johnston pitt Chowan Columbus Yadkin Mean Pioneer Hybrid 3165
Pioneer Hybrid 3055 +NC 106 AgraTech GK-900 NK PX95 WATSON 421 USS 9001 167* 166* 172* 161* 149 161* 152 65* 72* 68* 72* 77** 74* 65* 115 122* 111 128** 120* 102 108 156** 125* 153* 133* 147* 146* 140* 155** 136 131 120 132 123 127 121** 95* 100* 96* 83* 113* 119* 146* 150** 128* 137* 139* 127* 127* 132** 124* 123* 121 121 121 120 Jacques JX247 FCX 915
Pioneer Hybrid 3192 AgraTech GK-925 USS 2020 Paymaster 8951 153 65* 145 64* 139 72* 155 51 177** 55 163* 52 92 95 102 92 91 87 153* 129* 142* 144* 124* 135* 125 134* 113 120 122
I I I
90* 91* 98* 96* 80* 98* 141* 147* 134* 136* 145* 147* 117 115 114 114 114 113 FCX 905 +NC 104 Coker 8905 Baldridge 94A +NC 105 Baldridge 54A Watson 572 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK789 Paymaster 8990 FCX 955 NK PX508 FCX 929W Mean C.V. (%) B.L.S.D. (K-50) s.e. (x) Error d.f. 161* 142 138 153 147 152 148 159* 141 141 148 134 153 7.7 20 6.8 36 59 51 44 50 67* 67* 70* 37 57 40 54 48 60 19.4 17 6.7 36 97 104 110 116* 98 81 94 107 79 76 105 84 101 8.7 12 5.0 36 130* 142* 150* 116* 123* 118* 122* 130* 124* 130* 115* 115* 134 14.2 NS 10.7 36 112 112 125 115 117 124 123 140* 122 109 119 110 123 8.2 16 5.8 36 94* 95* 93* 78* 91* 77* 76* 77* 96* 83* 77* 66* 91 19.0 NS 10.0 36 139* 138* 116 143* 123 147* 126* 109 124 119 79 102 131 11.6 24 8.8 36 113 112
I I I
110 110 109 108 108 106 100 100 94 113 9.5 10 4.0 144 +Experimenta1. Seed of these hybrids mayor may not be available in 1986 and may
have a different designation. **Highest yielder.
Table 16. 1985 Ratings of entries in the gray leaf spot tests. Entry
watson 416A FCX9~5
Golden Harvest H-2686A Pioneer hybrid 3184 Funk's G-4614 Pioneer hybrid 332~
Rating
Y
8.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.8 Entry Baldridge 58 P-A-G SX383 Pfister 913-59 NK PX95 FCX 811 Jacques 782~ RatingY
6.4 6.4 6.3 6.1 5.9 5.9Pioneer hybrid 3535 7.8 NC 84 5.9
Pioneer hybrid 3187 7.6 Pfister 913-4~ 5.9
FCX 955 7.5 NC 86 5.8
Golden Harvest H-2675 7.5 Baldridge 3357 5.6
Baldridge 54A 7.3 DP X 4151 5.6
FCX8~8 7.3 NC 85 5.5
FCX 835
Pioneer hybrid 3192 watson 413A
DP X 2814 DP X 8262
7.3 7.3 7.3 7.1 7.1 NC 92 NC 97 NK PX79
Pioneer hybrid 3352 FCX 717 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.~ 4.9
Jacques 79~~ 7.1 NC 82 4.9
Watson 421 7.1 NC8~ 4.8
DP X 4436 7.~ NC9~ 4.6
NK PX74 7.~ Pioneer hybrid 3328 4.6
Baldridge 94A 6.9 NC 83 4.1
DeKalb Pfizer 72B 6.9 NC 87 4.1
NC 95 6.9 NC 91 4.1
FCX 767 6.8 NC 81 3.9
Jacques 81~~ 6.8 FCX 929W 3.8
Pioneer hybrid 3572 6.8 NC 88 3.8
B73 X MO 17 6.6 NC 89 3.6
Baldridge 647A NC 93 NK X591 Jacques 84~~ NC 94 Watson 418 L.S.D. (.~5) s.e. (x) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.5 1.~ ~.35
DeKalb Pfizer DK789 MO 17 X NC25~
DeKalb Pfizer DK689 Pioneer hybrid 3233 Watson 572 NC 96 3.4 3.1 3.~ 2.8 2.3 2.1
!/Rating Scale: 1 = ~-9%, 2 = 1~-19%, 3 = 2~-29%, 4 = 3~-39%, 5 6 = 5~-59%, 7 = 6~-69%, 8 =7~-79%, 9 =8~-89%,
Appreciation goes to Dr. Gary Payne for making the ratings.
Table 17.
30
Incidence of viral diseases on selected corn hybrids at Marion Junction, Alabama.!!
Hybrid or Brand-Hybrid AgraTech 85~ AgraTech 9~~ Asgrow RX4~4 DeKalb-Pfizer DK789 DeKalb-Pfizer T1230 DeKalb-Pfizer DK689 FFR 815 FFR 955~ FFR 929W Funk's G-4733 Funk's G-4734 Funk's G-4858
Golden Harvest H-266~W
Jacques 8400 McCurdy 84AA McCurdy 8150 NK PX95 NK PX87
O's Gold 55~9
Pioneer 3147 Pioneer 3187 RA 15~2 Maize Chlorotic Dwarf ~ 1.1 15.7 8.3 13.~ 8.6 15.7 15.9 21.2 8.8 13.7 3.4 29.4 1.6 15.7 4.7 1.0 8.5 6.5 1.8 18.9 8.9 Maize Dwarf Mosaic ~
o
2.~ 5.8 4.~ 5.8 2.7 3.1 2.1 1.0 2.9o
4.9o
1.0 2.8 1.9 1.0 2.6 0.9 0.8 2.2CORN SILAGE
Silage is an important part of the beef and dairy cattle industry in North Carolina, particularly in the Piedmont and Mountain regions.
This report presents the results of the North Carolina Official Corn Silage trials for the 1985 season.
Entries: Any individual or firm may make application for having hybrids tested. Personnel of the testing program may also include entries about which further information is desired.
Early in January each year, rules governing the tests for the ensuing year are distributed to all previous participants and to those who make inquiry.
Agencies sponsoring entries in the 1985 tests are shown in Table 18.
Table 18. Name, contact person, and address of sponsoring agencies in the 1985 North Carolina Corn Silage Performance Trials along with designation used to identify the hybrids in the trials.
Name, Contact Person, Address Coker's Pedigreed Seed Company Richard Gettys
P. O. Box 340, Hartsville, SC 29550 DeKalb-Pfizer Genetics
3100 Sycamore Road DeKalb, IL 60115
FCX, Inc., Marvin Godfrey
P. O. Box 2419, Raleigh, NC 27602 Funk Seeds International, Ron Walberg, P. O. Box 2911, Bloomington, IL 61701 Jacques Seed Company, Joe Waldo, 720 St. Croix, Prescott, WI 54021
Hybrid Designation Coker
DeKalb-Pfizer
FCX
Funk's
Table 18. (Continued)
32
Name, Contact Person, Adress
Northrup King Company, Myron Fountain 2114 Cowper Drive, Raleigh, NC 27608 P-A-G Seeds, J. Stuart Carney,
P. O. Box 9480, Minneapolis, MN 55440 Paymaster Seeds, John Harker,
P. O. Box 9493, Minneapolis, MN 55440 Pioneer Hi-Bred, Inc., Paul Rodgers 1000 W. Jefferson St., Tipton, IN 46072
Hybrid Designation
NK
P-A-G
Paymaster
Pioneer
Field Plot Technique: One test was located in Haywood County on a creek bottom and one in Rowan County on an upland soil.
Plots consisted of four rows with the center two rows harvested. Four replications were planted in a randomized, complete block design. Plots were 23 feet long with five foot alleys.
All plots were overp1anted and later thinned to the desired stand.
Table 19 lists the cultural practices used; Table 20 lists soil test results.
Table 19. Cultural practices used on the corn silage tests - 1985.
Top-Fertilizer dressing Date Date
Location lbs/A and lbs of of
by County Grade N/A Planting Harvest
Haywood 500 500
10-10-20 33.5% May 6 September
24 and 25
Rowan 500 145 April 11 August 14
Seasonal Conditions: A relatively warm, dry spring allowed planting to occur approximately one week earlier than normal. Rainfall was below normal for the entire growing season at both locations.
Rainfall (Inches) Location
by County Haywood Rowan
May 2.flJ6 3.33
June 2.30 4.33
July 3.84 4.61
August 3.87 0.55
Sep-tember
3.18
Data: Data were collected on percent dry matter at harvest, dry matter yield, silage yield, grain yield, plan dry matter yield, silage yield, grain yield, plant height, and plant population.
Table 20. Soil test re.sult.s, corn sil.age - 1985. Location
by County HM%
w-v
CEC BS % AC pH. P-I K-I Ca. % Mg % Mn-I Zn-I CU-IHaywood 1.1 .94 7.1 78 1.6 5.8 59 156 50.6 16.0 625 45 106 w
~
Table 21. Data combined over locations for corn silage hybrids. Two and three year averages.
Hybrid or Brand-Hybrid Dry Matter Tons/Acre Silage Yield Tons/Acre %Dry Matter At Harvest Three Year Average - 1983, 1984, 1985
pioneer 3165 NK PX79 pioneer 3389 Pioneer 3147 Coker 22 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 17.2 16.5 16.5 16.3 16.3 38 40 43 35 38 ~
-FCX 929W 5.7 16.2 36
Pioneer 3187 5.7 16.2 38
Funk's G-4734 5.6 16.0 38
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK789 5.6 15.9 35
FCX 848 4.6 13.1 34
Two Year Average
-
1984, 1985Jacques 8400 6.9 19.8 38
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK656 6.8 19.5 41
DeKa1b-Pfizer DK689 6.8 19.6 39
P-A-G SX383 6.8 19.3 41
NK PX79 6.7 19.1 44
Funk's G-4858 6.7 19.0 37
36
Table 22. Average performance of corn silage hybrids
-
1985.%Dry
Dry Silage Matter Grain Plant Population Hybrid or Matter Yield at Yield Height Plants/ Brand Hybrid Tons/A Tons/A Harvest Bu/A (in. ) Acre
NK PX79 5.4** 15.3 47 176 93 26273
FCX 929W 5.0* 14.4 39 115 99 24440
Jacques 8400 4.8* 13.8 41 159 95 27495 DeKalb-Pfizer DK656 4.6* 13.3 44 164 92 26884 DeKalb-Pfizer DK689 4.6* 13.1 41 163 95 26884
---DeKa1b-Pfizer DK748 4.6* 13.1 37 198 98 26884 P-A-G SX383 4.5* 12.9 42 168 97 26884
FCX 717 4.5* 12.9 45 159 96 26884
Coker 21 4.4* 12.6 41 169 99 30550
Coker 8905 4.4* 12.5 35 133 98 26884
---Pioneer 3389 4.3* 12.3 46 173 96 27495 DeKalb-Pfizer DK562 4.3* 12.2 47 151 93 26884 Funk's G-4858 4.3* 12.2 38 159 94 20163
NK PX95 4.3* 12.2 37 155 95 26273
Pioneer 3320 4.2 12.1 42 153 95 27495
Coker 22 4.2 11.9 41 151 96 28717
Pioneer 3147 4.1 11.7 38 167 96 26884 Pioneer 3165 4.1 11.6 41 168 92 27495 Pioneer 3187 4.0 11.6 40 159 96 27495 Paymaster 9990 3.9 11.2 35 115 101 24440
---Funk's G-4734 3.8 10.8 38 162 87 25662 DeKalb-Pfizer DK789 3.8 10.7 38 165 96 26884
FCX 848 3.7 10.6 40 153 98 24440
FCX 955 3.7 10.5 41 152 97 26884
Paymaster' 8951 3.6 10.3 41 159 96 26884 Mean
C.V. (%)
B.L.S.D. (K-50) s.e. (x) Error d.f.
4.3 2-2-1.1 0.5 144 **Highest yielder.
Table 23. Average performance of corn silage hybrids at Haywood County - 1985. Hybrid or Brand Hybrid FCX 929W NK PX79 Coker 8995 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK748 P-A-G SX383 Funk's G-4858 Jacques 8499 NK PX95 FCX 717 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK68g DeKa1b-Pfizer DK656 Pioneer 3147 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK562 Coker 21 Pioneer 3165 Coker 22 Paymaster 9999 Pioneer 3329 Pioneer 3389 Funk's G-4734 Pioneer 3187 FCX 955 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK789 Paymaster 8951 FCX 848 Mean C.V. (%) B.L.S.D. (K-59) s.e. (x) Error d.f. Dry Matter Tons/A 5.9** 5.7* 5.6* 5.5* 5.5* 5.2* 5.2* 5.2* 4.9* 4.9* 4.9* 4.8* 4.7* 4.7* 4.7* 4.6* 4.5* 4.4* 4.4* 4.1* 4.9* 4.9* 3.9* 3.6 3.6 4.7 24":0 2.2 9.6 72 Silage Yield Tons/A 16.9 16.4 16.1 15.9 15.8 15.9 14.8 14.8 14.1 14.1 13.9 13.8 13.4 13.3 13.3 13.1 12.8 12.5 12.5 11.8 11.5 11.3 11.1 19.3 19.3 % Dry Matter at Harvest 31 35 27 28 33 33 29 39 34 39 36 31 37 31 32 29 26 33 33 29 32 29 28 29 31 Grain Yield Bu/A 128 299* 128 223** 191 179 193 169 182 168 193 171 296* 211* 185 185 117 179 291 171 186 162 196 192 173 189 -8.6 18 7.7 72 Plant Height (in. ) 119 193 98 115 112 119 115 191 198 98 112 111 196 119 198 Population P1ants/ Acre 24449 26273 26884 26884 26884 29163 27495 26273 26884 26884 26884 26884 26884 39559 27495 28717 24449 27495 27495 25662 27495 26884 26884 26884 24449 **Highest yielder.
Table 24.
38
Average performance of corn silage hybrids at Rowan County - 1985.
Hybrid or Brand Hybrid NK PX79 Jacques 8400 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK656 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK689 Pioneer 3389 FCX 929W Coker 21 FCX 717 Pioneer 3320 Pioneer 3187 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK562 FCX 848 Coker 22 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK789 DeKa1b-Pfizer DK748 Paymaster 8951 P-A-G SX383 Pioneer 3165 Funk's G-4734 Pioneer 3147 FCX 955 NK PX95 Paymaster 9990 Funk's G-4858 Coker 8905 Mean C.V. (%) B.L.S.D. (K-50) s.e. (x) Error d.f. Dry Matter Tons/A 5.0** 4.5* 4.4* 4.2* 4.2* 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.1 a,a 17.3 1.0 0.3 72 Silage Yield TonslA 14.2 12.8 12.6 12.1 12.1 12.0 11.8 11.7 11.7 11.6 11.1 10.9 10.8 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.0 9.9 9.9 9.7 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.4 8.9 %Dry Matter at Harvest 58 53 52 52 58 48 51 55 51 49 57 49 52 48 46 53 52 50 48 46 52 43 44 44 44 Grain Yield BulA 142 125 134 157* 145 102 126 136 136 132 95 132 116 133 173** 126 144 150 153* 162* 142 141 112 139 137 136 11.7 21 8.0 72 Plant Height (in. ) 82 83 80 84 84 88 82 84 88 79 81 88 81 85 80 82 82 84 75 84 82 81 86 83 84 Population P1ants/ Acre 26273 27495 26884 26884 27495 24440 30550 26884 27495 27495 26884 24440 28717 26884 26884 26884 26884 27495 25662 26884 26884 26273 24440 20163 26884 **Highest yielder.
GRAIN SORGHUM
The majority of the grain sorghum in North Carolina is grown in the Piedmont with increasing acreage being grown in the Coastal Plain. In the Piedmont it i~ generally grown as a full-season crop while it is often double-cropped behind small grain or potatoes in the Coastal Plain.
Entries: Any individual or firm may make application for having entries tested. A fee is charged on an entry basis. Personnel of the testing program may also include entries about which further information is desired. '
Agencies and Contact Person Asgrow Seed Company Darel Zook
Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co. Richard Gettys
DeKalb-Pfizer Genetics Roy Ussery
Funk Seeds International Gary Hart
George Warner Seed Co. George Warner
Hyperformer Seed Bill Washburn
Northrup King Company Myron Fountain
P-A-G Seeds J. Stuart Carney Paymaster Seeds John Harker
Pioneer Hi-Bred Int., Inc. Paul Rodgers
Address
7000 Portage Road Kalamazoo, MI 49001 P. O. Box 340
Hartsville, SC 29550 Lubbock, TX 79415
1301 E. 50th St. Lubbock, TX 79404 P. O. Box 1448 Hereford, TX 7~945
5100 Poplar Memphis, TN 38137 2114 Cowper Drive Raleigh, NC 27608 P. O. Box 9480
Minneapolis, MN 55440 P. O. Box 9493
Minneapolis, MN 55440 1000 W. Jefferson st. Tipton, IN 46072
Designation Asgrow
Coker
DeKa1b
Funk's
Warner
Hyperformer
NK
P-A-G
Paymaster
40
Test Locations: Three full-season tests were located in the Piedmont with one double-crop test located in the Coastal Plain
(F igure 1).
Field Plot Technique: A randomized, complete block design was used with four replications at each full-season test. The
late-planted test had seven replications in a randomized complete block design. Plots were two rows 23 feet long on a 38" or 30" row width. Plots were overseeded and thinned to 5-6 plants per foot if necessary. Cultural practices are shown in Table 25. Table 26 lists soil test results.
Seasonal Conditions: Soil moisture was adequate at Rowan and Anson Counties but inadequate at Stanly County resulting in poor stands at that particular location. Consequently, the Stanly County test was discarded. The late-planted test at Washington County was discarded due to extensive bird damage and lodging. Below normal rainfall was experienced at Anson and Rowan County for much of the growing season; moreso at Anson than at Rowan. The Rowan test site received 2.71 inches of rainfall in May, 4.33 in June, 4.61 in July, and 6.47 in August.
Data: Data were collected on yield, moisture at harvest, head compactness, head exsertion, and plant height. All plot yields were adjusted to 14% moisture and reported in pounds per acre. A
description of head type was determined and indicated with "1" denoting a compact head and "3" denoting a loose head. Head
material hindering the operation. Date 50% flowered was collected at two test sites. Percent bird damage was collected at the full-season test sites.
Results: Table 27 shows the two year averages. Table 28 shows the 1985 data combined over locations, while Table 29 shows the individual location yield data. The average yield of 1204 pounds per acre at Anson County is a reflection of the severity of the summer drought. Table 30 shows the bird damage ratings of the
hybrids in alphabetical order. Although the top yielding hybrid had the least amount of bird damage, there seemed to be little
Table
25.CuI tural practices on grain sorghum performanc.e t.ria.ls,
1985.Location
Fertilizer
Topdressing
Date of
Date of
by County
Lbs/A and Grade
Lbs N/A
Planting
Harvest
EARLY PLANTED TESTS
~
Anson
300 80 ~·1ay 14September
16 l\J5-15-30
Rowan
400 90May 8
September
18Table 26. Soil test results, grain sorghum - 1985.
Location
by County HM %
w-v
CEC BS %AcpH
P-I K-I Ca % MG % Mn-I Zn-I Cu-IAnson .5 1.42 3.1 74 .8 6.0 128 82 45.9 14.4 110 149 40 ~
w
44
TABlE 27. t\l\TA <n-1BINED OVER LOCATICNS FOR GRAIN roRGHUM.
EARLY PIMmID
'MJYFAR AVERAGE - 1984, 1985.
HFAD PIANT
HYBRID OR YIELD (D.1- EXSERrICN HEIGlfi'
BAAND-HYBRID U3S/A ftDIS'lURE PPCINESS INCHES INCHES roOOE
NK SAVANNA 5 3751 .162 1.0 9 65 0
HYPERFORMER 1330DR 3454 .173 1.0 5 58 5
ASGROW WPAZ 3422 .171 1.0 5 48 0
DEKALB M-565 3394 .166 1.3 5 48 9
FtNK'S G-1711 3384 .168 1.0 4 52 3
HYPERFORMER 1225DR 3318 .170 1.5 6 47 3
PlOOEER 8333 3313 .172 2.3 7 48 0
NK 2660 3307 .160 1.4 5 50 0
DEKALB DK-61 3244 .178 1.9 4 53 0
OOKER 7675 3216 .169 1.3 4 48 0
PlOOEER 8300 3215 .179 2.6 6 52 0
FtNK'S G-522DR 3213 .176 1.3 5 47 0
PIONEER 8222 3144 .179 2.0 5 47 0
DEKALB DK-64 3102 .187 1.4 6 54 5
PIOOEER 8515 2893 .172 1.9 8 49 4
PAYMASTER 1091 2891 .160 2.0 5 51 11
PAG 5665 2790 .163 2.4 7 47 5
TABlE 28. GRAIN OORGHUM -1985- FARLY PlANTED DM'A CD1BINED OVER lDCATlOOS
HFAD PLANT
HYBRID OR YIELD (D.1- EXSERI'IOO HEIGHT
BRAND-HYBRID IBS/A K)IS'1\JRE PAcrNESS INOIES INaiES IDOOE
-NKSAVANNA 5 3960 .120 1.0 8 61 0
+liB EXP. ~OCS5 3343 .130 1.3 5 46 0
-\~ 744DR 3126 .138 2.5 3 50 0
DEKALB M-565 3062 .124 1.5 4 47 0
FlNK'S G-1711 3044 .131 1.0 3 49 0
ASGRaIl 'lOPAZ 3028 .123 1.0 5 45
a
WARNER 839DR 2987 ~117 1.3 5 47
a
PAYMASTER 1091 2948 .115 2.0 4 49
a
CDKER 7675 2913 .129 1.0 4 47
a
PlOOEER 8333 2884 .125 2.0 7 48
a
FlNK'S G-522DR 2880 .136 1.0 4 45 0
PAYMASTER DRl125 2864 .129 1.3 4 46 0
HYPERFORMER 1225DR 2857 .130 1.0 6 45 0
PAG 5665 2832 .110 2.3 7 45
a
NK 2660 2806 .124 1.3 5 47
a
HYPERFORMER 1330DR 2709 .129 1.0 4 57
a
ASGROW QiAPPARRAL 2698 .127 1.8 6 55 0
PAG 5572 2670 .142 1.5 3 47 0
PlOOEER 8515 2576 .133 1.8 9 51 0
PlOOEER 8222 2572 .127 2.0 4 44 0
WARNER 876DR 2548 .136 1.0 6 54 0
HYPERFORMER IDNCHO 2542 .128 1.3 4 42 0
PAYMASTER 1022 2485 .128 1.0 3 43 0
FlNK'S G-550 2483 .139 1.0 3 46
a
NK 2779 2474 .124 1.8 7 47
a
PlOOEER 8300 2422 .142 2.3 5 50 0
CDKER 7638 2411 .142 1.5 5 42 0
PAG 4462 2403 .131 2.3 6 49 0
NK 2665 2396 .131 1.0 4 44 0
DEKALB DK-64 2370 .147 1.3 5 53 0
DEKALB DK-61 2243 .139 1.3 4 48 0
WARNER 85lDR 2074 .140 1.3 4 46 0
+EXPERIMENTALS. SEED OF '!HIS ENTRY MAY OR MAYWI' BE AVAIlABlE IN 1986 AND I~Y AJ..S:) HAVE A DIFFERENI' DESIGNATlOO.
46
TABIE 29. INDIVIDUAL IDCATIOO YIEID D7\TA FOR GRAIN S:>RGHUM - 1985 FARLY PIMlI'ED
HYBRID OR
BRAND-HYBRID rowAN ANSON MEAN
-NK SAVANNA 5 5478 ** 2442.** 3960 **
+HB EXP. 98OCS5 5044 * 1641 3343 *
-WARNER 744DR 4989 * 1263 3126 *
DEKALB M-565 5037 * 1086 3062 *
FtNK'S G-1711 3981 2107 * 3044*
MiGROWTOPAZ 5103 * 953 3028 *
WARNER 839DR 4722* 1252 2987 *
PAYMASTER 1091 4489 1406 2948 *
CDKER 7675 5030* 796 2913 *
PIa~ 8333 4435 1333 2884*
FlNK'S G-522DR 4307 1453 2880*
PAYMASTER DRl125 4417 1311 2864*
HYPERFORMER 1225DR 4415 1300 2857 *
PAG 5665 4595 1069 2832 *
NK 2660 4590 1022 2806*
HYPERFORMER 1330DR 3971 1447 2709*
A'3GRDW QiAPPARRAL 4480 917 2698*
PAG 5572 4047 1294 2670*
PIamER 8515 3196 1956* 2576*
PIamER 8222 4010 1134 2572*
WARNER 876DR 3911 1186 2548*
HYPERFORMERlJ)NClI) 4113 970 2542*
PAYMASTER 1022 4164 807 2485*
FtNK'S G-550 4460 505 2483*
NK 2779 4142 806 2474*
PIONEER 8300 3326 1517 2422*
CDKER 7638 4156 666 2411*
PAG 4462 3924 882 2403*
NK 2665 3706 1085 2396*
DEKALB DK-64 3736 1003 2370*
DEKALB DK-61 3432 1055 2243*
WARNER 851DR 3277 871 2074*
MEAN 4271 1204 2738
c.v.
(%) ---r4.9 --n.9--w.2
B.L.S.D. 828 591 NS
S.E. 318 228 336
D.F. OF ERroR 93 93 31
---~---.-_----~----~~---+EXPERIMF.1lI'ALS. SEED OF 'lHIS ENTRY MAY OR M1\Y
sor
BE AVAIIABLE IN 1986AND MAY1\I..s:J HAVE A DIFF'ERENf DESIGNATION.-BIRD RESISTANT.
**HIGHEST YIELDER IN TEST.
TABLE 30. INDIVIDUAL IOCATIW BIRD Il\MAGE mTA roR GRAIN OORGHUM - 1985
EARLY PLANTED
HYBRID OR R)WAN ANSOO' MEAN
BRAND-HYBRID
ASGROW CHAPPARRAL 18 49 33
ASGRDW roPAZ 15 53 34
CDKER 7638 13 55 34
CDKER 7675 15 43 29
DEKALB DK-61 28 36 32
DEKALB DK-64 30 28 29
DEKALB M-565 14 33 23
FWK'S G-1711 13 24 18
FtNK'S G-522DR 13 31 22
FWK'S G-550 28 69 48
liB EXP. ~OCS5 23 29 26
HYPERFORMER lDNClD 18 41 29
HYPERFORMER 1225DR 18 30 24
HYPERFORMER 1330DR 40 28 34
NK SAVANNA 5 5 5 5
NK 2660 19 31 25
NK 2665 13 35 24
NK 2779 28 58 43
PAG 4462 33 24 28
PAG 5572 15 28 21
PAG 5665 15 39 27
PAYMASTER DRl125 18 35 26
PAYMASTER 1022 23 40 31
PAYMASTER 1091 15 26 21
PIOOEER 8222 20 35 28
PIOOEER 8300 28 35 31
PIOOEER 8333 18 25 21
PIOOEER 8515 48 31 39
WARNER744DR 10 39 24
WARNER 839DR 18 31 24
WARNER 851DR 23 36 29
48
Table 31. Data 50% flowered for full-season grain sorghum hybrids at two locations - 1985.
Anson Rowan
Brand Hybrid County County
Asgrow Chapparra1 7-21 7-19
Asgrow Topaz 7-21 7-19
Coker 7638 7-19 7-13
Coker 7675 7-22 7-19
DeKa1b DK-61 7-25 7-20
DeKa1b DK-64 7-22 7-18
DeKa1b M-565 7-21 7-20
Funk's G-522DR 7-20 7-19
Funk's G-550 7-20 7-17
Funk's G-1711 7-21 7-20
HB Exp. 980CS5 7-21 7-20
Hyperformer 1225DR 7-20 7-19
Hyperformer 1330DR 7-21 7-19
Hyperformer Honcho 7-20 7-12
NK 2660 7-21 7-19
NK 2665 7-22 7-19
SOYBEANS
There are several high-yielding soybean varieties available to the producer from which he may choose according to desired maturity date, lodging, pest resistance, etc. Information on the perform-ance of commercial varieties and experimental lines grown in different locations in the state is provided in this report.
Entries: Experimental lines and commercial varieties
developed by both public and private agencies are included in this program. Any individual or firm may make application for having entries included. A fee is charged on an entry basis. Personnel of the testing program may include entries about which further information is desired.
Agencies and Contact Person Asgrow Seed Company William Dimond
Delta & Pine Land Co. Tom Wofford
FCX, Inc. Marvin Godfrey Gurley's Raymond Gurley Hyperfdrmer Seed Co. Bill Washburn
Jacob Hartz Seed Co. Curtis Williams Northrup King Co. Myron Fountain
N. C. Agric. Res. Sere and USDA
Joe Burton
Address
7000 Portage Road Kalamazoo, MI 49001 1200 Herring Avenue Wilson, NC 27893 P. O. Box 2419 Raleigh, NC 27602 Box 388
Selma, NC 27576 5100 Poplar Memphis, TN 38137
P. O. Box 946 stuttgart, AR 72160 2114 Cowper Drive Raleigh, NC 27608 Raleigh, NC
Designation Asgrow A
De1tapine
FFR
GI
Sumter, HB, Wilstar, Sampson, Shiloh, Starr Hartz, H
NK, NK's McNair
Agencies and Contact Person
Pioneer Hi-Bred Int., Inc. Paul Rodgers Rohm and Haas
Seed, Inc.
50
Address
1~0~
w.
Jefferson St. Tipton, IN 46~72P. O. Box 1896
Hartsville, SC 2955~
Designation Pioneer
Coker, RA
Test Locations: One full-season test was located in the Piedmont and four in the Coastal Plain; three late-planted tests were located also in the Coastal Plain and one in the Piedmont.
Data: Data were collected on yield, moisture, lodging, plant height, date of pod maturity, seed size, and oil percent. Yields were calculated on plot weight and adjusted to 14% moisture. Lodging was scored on a scale of 1-5 with "1" being no lodging and "5" being completely lodged. Plant height was determined by
measuring from the ground to the top of the plant prior to harvest. Date of pod maturity was observed when 95% of the pods turned brown. Oil percent was determined at the USDA Soybean Laboratory; appreciation goes to Dr. Rich Wilson and Jamie Fish for running these analyses.
Rainfall (Inches)
Sep-Location May June July August tember October
Rowan 3.33 4.33 4.61 6.47 0.12 3.72
Lenoir 0.87 1.14 9.34 4.44 4.67 4.20
Washington 0.05 4.48 5.58 4.07 8.44 4.57
Edgecombe 4.00 12.60 7.30 3.40 3.10
Johnston 3.00 10.00 1.00 1.00
Levels of worm populations, various species, were suffi-cient to require insecticide applications at most locations.
Cultural practices followed are listed in Table 32 while soil test results are shown in Table 33.
Harvest conditions were poor with many days in November being warm and humid. Consequently, soybeans were harvested later than normal. This delay in harvest resulted in seed deterioration in the pod. Test weights were very low.
Results:
Early-Planted Soybeans
Two and three-year averages for the early-maturity group (Group V) are found in Table 34. Coker 485 and Deltapine 105 led the averages followed closely by several other varieties. Table 35 shows the 1985 data. The drought was particularly severe on this group of soybeans at Halifax County resulting in an average yield of 13 bushels per acre.
Young is the three-year yield leader followed closely by RA 606 for the medium-maturing group (Table 36). Hartz 6383R joins Young as the yield leaders in the two-year average. Sampson,
52
Data for the late-maturing soybean varieties (Groups VII and VIII) are presented in Tables 38 and 39.
Late-Planted Soybeans
Deltapine 105 leads the three and two-year yield averages for the early-maturing soybeans (Table 40). It is also the yield leader for 1985 with 24 bushels/acre followed closely by Pioneer 9751 and Asgrow A5980 (Table 41). Yields were low in 1985 particularly at Johnston County.
NK S69-96 is the three-year yield leader while RA 606 and Deltapine 566 tie for the two-year yield leader in the medium maturing group (Table 42). Data for 1985 are presented in Table 43.
Coker 368 and Deltapine 417 tie in yield at 36 bushels/acre to lead the late-maturing varieties after three years (Table 44). Deltapine 417 leads the two-year average with 42 bushels/acre. An experimental, Coker 82-645, was the yield leader in 1985 across all locations (Table 45).
Two and three-year averages and 1985 data for date 95% pods brown are shown in Tables 46, 47, and 48. These two and three-year averages reflect a more accurate picture of the average date of physiological maturity than anyone year. It should be noted that the soybeans should be ready to harvest 10 days after the date 95% pods brown given optimum harvest conditions. Table 49 lists the oil percentage and seed size for entries in the full-season tests.
Table 32.
Row Date Date
Location width Fertilizer Soil of of
by County (inches) Lbs/A Tillage Type Planting Harvest
Early Planted Tests
Lenoir 38 300 Conventional Goldsboro May 13 Dec. 4
0-9-27 Loamy Sand
Robeson 36 100 Conventional Rains Sandy May 20 Dec. 5
0-0-60 Loam
Halifax 36 200 Conventional May 21 Dec. 9
6-12-36
U1
w
Washington 38 314 Conventional Portsmouth May 28 Dec. 11
0-18-36 Sandy Loam
Rowan 30 200 Conventional May 15 Nov. 11
10-34-30 Late Planted Tests
Johnston 30 Minimum June 11 Dec. 5
and 9
Edgecombe 36 Minimum June 10 Nov. 11
and 19
Rowan 30 No-Till Hiwassee June 26 Dec. 11
Table 33. Soil test results, soybeans - 1985. Location
by County HM % W-V CEC BS %Ac pH P-I K-I Ca % Mg % Mn-I Zn-I Cu-I
-Early Planted
Lenoir .6 1.42 4.2 81 • 8 6.3 113 74 52.5 19.6 38 28 34
Robeson 1.1 1.21 3.8 89 .4 6.1 166 92 58.5 18.6 59 75 46
Washington 3.8 1.79 9.5 66 3.2 5.5 43 78 35.8 26.5 20 56 40
U1
Halifax 1.1 1.22 4.8 75 1.2 5.8 159 64 58.6 9.6 63 76 126 ~
Rowan .3 1.00 8.5 95 .4 6.9 20 106 67.0 22.1 625 82 162
Late Planted
Johnston .7 1.19 3.6 89 .4 6.0 92 40 64.6 18.5 154 281 68
Edgecombe .7 1.34 3.1 74 .8 5.8 166 102 45.3 12.3 46 72 42
TABLE 34. PERFO~~CEOF EARLY PLANTED EARLY t-1ATURING SOYBEANS
COMBINED OVER LOCATIONS.
THREE-YEAR AVERAGE 1983, 1984, AND 1985.
BRAND-VARIETY YIELD PLANT HEIGHT
OR VARIETY BUS/A LODGING INCHES NOISTURE
COKER 485 39 1.2 32 .146
PIONEER 9561 39 1.2 33 .151
DELTAPINE 105 39 1.7 34 .146
PIONEER 5482 39 1.2 33 .144
BAY 38 1.2 35 .156
ASGRO\v A5474 37 1.1 34 .153
BEDFORD 36 1.5 38 .148
FORREST 35 1.3 33 .148
WILSTAR 550 31 1.1 31 .145
TWO-YEAR AVERAGE - 1984, 1985.
DELTAPINE 105 40 2.0 33 .138
PIONEER 5482 40 1.4 33 .141
PIONEER 9561 40 1.3 33 .142
COKER 485 40 1.3 32 .139
BAY 39 1.3 33 .144
PIONEER 9571 38 1.8 34 .142
ASGRO\v A5474 37 1.2 34 .147
ASGRO\'l A5980 37 1.7 36 .147
BEDFORD 37 1.7 37 .144
HARTZ 5252 36 1.6 34 .145
HARTZ 5370 36 1.5 38 .144
HARTZ 5171 36 2.1 36 .149
FFR 562 36 1.7 37 .145
FORREST 35 1.4 32 .143
56
TABLE 35. PERFOID~M~CE OF EARLY PLANTED EARLY¥~TURING SOYBEANS 1985. LENOIR ROBESON WASHINGTON HALIFAX AVERAGE
PLANT BRAND-VARIETY YIELD YIELD YIELD YIELD YIELD HEIGHT
OR VARIETY BUS/A BUS/A BUS/A BUS/A BUS/A LODGING INCHES {\10ISTURE COKER 485 33 ** 31 * 29 17 * 28** 1.3 32 .133 PIONEER 5482 25 31 * 39 ** 12 * 27* 1.5 34 .130 ASGROW A5980 26 * 27 * 34 * 14 * 25* 1.8 36 .133 DELTAPINE 105 28 * 28 * 27 16 * 25* 1.6 31 .129 HARTZ 5171 27 * 32 * 28 12 * 25* 2.0 38 .136 ESSEX 27 * 33 ** 22 17 * 25* 1.1 27 .131 ASGROW A5474 26 * 31 * 28 14 * 25* 1.2 34 .135
BAY 26 * 26 * 32 15 * 25* 1.4 34 .135
PIONEER 9561 23 29 * 29 13 * 24* 1.1 34 .133 FORREST 22 25 * 27 19 ** 23 1.4 33 .128 COKER 425 32 * 24 21 16 * 23 1.0 22 .131 GI 569 22 27 * 33 * 11 * 23 1.5 33 .131 BEDFORD 20 29 * 30 13 * 23 1.6 37 .133 FFR 562 23 27 * 27 14* 23 1.6 37 .131 PIONEER 9571 24 26 * 30 12 * 23 1.8 33 .134 HARTZ 5252 19 27 * 29 15 * 23 1.5 34 .132 HARTZ 5370 24 25 * 30 11* 23 1.3 38 .133
SHILOH 20 29 * 26 14 * 22 1.1 35 .132
COKER 575 17 23 32 10 * 20 1.6 36 .131 ASGROW A5149 24 21 25 9 * 20 1.0 29 .122 NK' S ~lCNAIR 500 19 19 21 8* 17 1.0 33 .124 WILSTAR 550 17 14 16 6 * 13 1.2 35 .125 MEAN OF TEST 24 27 28 13 24
B.L.S.D. (K=50) 7 8 6 N.S. 4
C. V. 18 18 15 33 19
S.E. (X) 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.5 1.7
ERROR D.F. 42 42 42 21 63
---+EXPERIf-1ENTALS. SEED OF THESE VARIETIES ~~Y OR MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE IN 1986 AND t1AY HAVE A DIFFERENT DESIGNATION.
**HIGHEST YIELDER.
TABLE 36. PERFORMANCE OF EARLY PLANTED MEDIUl·'1 MATURING SOYBEANS COMBINED OVER LOCATIONS.
THREE-YEAR AVERAGE 1983, 1984, AND 1985.
BRAND-VARIETY YIELD PLANT HEIGHT
OR VARIETY BUS/A LODGING INCHES NOI8TURE
YOUNG 41 1.7 39 .153
RA 606 40 1.7 39 .147
RA 680 38 1.1 37 .152
DELTAPINE 506 37 1.5 41 .152
NK 869-96 37 1.5 38 .151
CEN'rENNIAL 37 1.2 38 .148
FFR 668 37 1.3 39 .152
DAVIS 37 1.7 39 .151
SUMTER 36 1.3 41 .150
FFR 666 36 1.2 31 .148
COKER 156 36 1.4 36 .149
TWO-YEAR AVERAGE - 1984, 1985.
YOUNG 41 2.0 39 .152
HARTZ 6383R 41 2.0 37 .149
RA 606 40 2.0 39 .147
NK 569-54 38 1.5 34 .146
A8GRO\v A6381 38 1.4 34 .149
DELTAPINE 506 38 1.8 41 .151
DELTAPINE 566 38 1.2 35 .151
RA 680 37 1.2 38 .153
DAVIS 37 1.9 38 .150
CENTENNIAL 36 1.3 37 .150
SUMTER 36 1.5 40 .147
FFR 668 36 1.5 39 .152
NK 869-96 36 1.8 38 .153
COKER 156 35 1.6 36 .149
58
TABLE 37. PERFORMANCE OF EARLY PLANTED MEDIUH MATURING SOYBEANS 1985. LENOIR ROBESON WASHINGTON HALIFAX AVERAGE
PLANT BRAND-VARIETY YIELD YIELD YIELD YIELD YIELD HEIGHT
OR VARIETY BUS/A BUS/A BUS/A BUS/A BUS/A LODGING INCHES MOISTURE SAMPSON 34 * 41** 31** 26* 33** 1.2 37 .141 DELTAPINE 566 29 37* 29* 28 ** 31* 1.2 33 .138 HARTZ 6383R 36 ** 35* 26 24* 30* 2.1 39 .141
YOUNG 31 * 33 28* 25* 29 1.8 39 .132
NK S69-54 31 * 39* 27* 19 29 1.6 33 .135
RA 606 33 * 37* 25 21* 29 2.1 37 .134
COKER 686 30 * 32 30* 17 27 1.6 36 .140
RA 680 32 * 30 24 21* 27 1.1 38 .139
DELTAPINE 506 32 * 28 26 21 * 27 1.4 38 .145 ASGROW A6381 32 * 31 26 17 27 1.3 36 .132
CENTENNIAL 28 32 23 18 25 1.3 37 .135
NI< 569-96 30 * 31 18 22 * 25 1.4 39 .137
F~"R 668 29 27 23 20* 24 1.2 40 .136
DAVIS 20 30 25 17 23 1.9 38 .132
COKER 156 30 * 25 17 16 22 1.4 34 .136
FFR 666 22 27 23 17 22 1.4 30 .133
GI 651 21 29 22 16 22 1.4 38 .134
COKER 596 23 29 17 17 22 1.3 36 .139
SUl-1TER 16 26 25 17 21 1.6 39 .134
HARTZ 6130 24 22 19 12 20 1.4 38 .130
GI 652 17 26 17 15 19 1.3 35 .133
l'1EAN OF 'fEST 28 31 24 19 25
B.L.S.D. (K=50) 6 6 4 8 3
C. V. 16 13 12 25 16
S.E. (X) 2.6 2.3 1.6 2.8 1.5
ERROR D.F. 40 40 40 40 60
---+EXPERIMENTALS. SEED OF THESE VARIETIES MAY OR~~Y NOT BE AVAILABLE IN 1986 AND ~mY HAVE A DIFFERENT DESIGNATION.
**HIGIlEST YIELDER.
TABLE 38. PERFORMANCE OF EARLY PLANTED LATE MATURING SOYBEANS COMBINED OVER LOCATIONS.
THREE-YEAR AVERAGE 1983, 1984, AND 1985.
BRAND-VARIETY YIELD PLANT HEIGHT
OR VARIETY BUS/A LODGING INCHES MOISTURE
GASOY 17 43 1.7 39 .154
COKER 368 42 1.4 43 .157
DELTAPINE 417 42 1.4 43 .152
NK'S MCNAIR 700 41 1.3 37 .148
FOSTER 41 2.0 38 .159
\vILSTAR 790 41 1.5 40 .152
BRAXTON 41 1.3 41 .152
COKER 237 40 1.3 38 .156
RA 702 40 1.5 36 .153
BRAGG 40 1.4 41 .155
NK S72-60 39 1.9 39 .156
JOHNSTON 38 1.5 36 .157
DELTAPINE 497 38 1.5 43 .151
ASGRO\v A7372 37 1.4 36 .155
RANSOM 37 1.3 37 .154
BUrrTON 35 1.9 40 .152
TWO-YEAR AVERAGE - 1984, 1985.
KIRBY 44 1.4 40 .149
GASOY 17 43 2.0 38 .154
BRAXTON 42 1.4 42 .149
DELTAPINE 417 41 1.6 42 .151
COKER 368 41 1.6 44 .157
rosrea
41 2.4 38 .158\vILSTAR 790 41 1.7 41 .150
NK'S MCNAIR 700 41 1.5 38 .146
RA 702 40 1.6 38 .149
HARTZ 7126 40 1.6 41 .153
BRAGG 40 1.6 41 .153
NK 872-60 39 2.3 39 .152
COKER 237 39 1.5 41 .153
JOHNSTON 38 1.7 37 .154
DELTAPINE 497 38 1.8 43 .149
RANSOt1 37 1.5 37 .151
FFR 711 37 1.7 42 .151
GORDON 36 1.7 39 .157
ASGRO\v A7372 36 1.6 38 .155