R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Embedding theorems for composition of
homotopy and projection operators
Jinling Niu
1, Shusen Ding
2and Yuming Xing
1**Correspondence:
1Department of Mathematics,
Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
We prove both local and global embedding theorems withLϕ-norms for the composition of the homotopy operator and projection operator applied to differential forms. We also establish someLϕ-norm inequalities for certain
compositions of the related operators.
MSC: Primary 35J60; secondary 35B45; 30C65; 47J05; 46E35
Keywords: embedding inequalities; differential forms; homotopy operators; projection operators
1 Introduction
The homotopy operatorT and projection operatorH defined on differential forms are two critical operators which have been very well studied and used in recent years, see [–]. In many situations, we need to deal with the compositionT◦Hof the homotopy operatorTand the projection operatorH. For example, when we consider the decompo-sition ofH(u), we have to face the compositionT◦H. The study of the compositionT◦H
of homotopy and projection operators was initiated by Ding and Liu in in [] and [], respectively, where they investigated singular integrals of this composite operator and established someLpinequalities for the composite operatorT◦Hwith singular factors.
Later, in , Bi and Ding proved someLϕ-estimates for this composite operatorT◦H
in [], whereϕsatisfies theG(p,q,C) condition. The purpose of this paper is to establish theLϕ-embedding theorems for the compositionT◦Happlied to differential forms, here
ϕsatisfies theNG(p,q) condition. If we chooseϕ(t) =tp, theLϕ-norm inequalities reduce
toLp-norm inequalities. Our mainLϕ-embedding inequality for the composite operator
can be simply stated as
T
H(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ()≤CuLϕ(), (.)
whereis any bounded domain inRn,n≥,ϕ: [,∞)→[,∞) withϕ() = is a Young function satisfying certain conditions described later, andCis a constant independent of the differential formu. In order to establish the above mainLϕ-embedding inequality,
we also prove the Poincaré inequality and some inequalities withLϕ-norm for the related
compositions of operators.
We keep using the traditional notations throughout this paper. LetBandσBbe the balls with the same center anddiam(σB) =σdiam(B). Let|E|be then-dimensional Lebesgue measure of a setE⊆Rn. In this paper, we treat a ball same as a cube and useu
B=|B|
Bu dx
to denote the average of a function u. Let ∧l=∧l(Rn) be the set of alll-forms inRn,
D(,∧l) be the space of all differentiall-forms in, andLp(,∧l) be thel-formsu(x) =
IuI(x)dxIinsatisfying
|uI|
p<∞for all orderedl-tuplesI,l= , , . . . ,n. We denote
the exterior derivative bydand the Hodge star operator by.
The definition of the operatorKywith the casey= and its generalized version can
be found in [, ]. To eachy∈there corresponds a linear operatorKy:C∞(,∧l)→
C∞(,∧l–) defined by (K
yω)(x;ξ, . . . ,ξl–) =
tl–ω(tx+y–ty;x–y,ξ, . . . ,ξl–)dtand the
decompositionω=d(Kyω) +Ky(dω). A homotopy operatorT:C∞(,∧l)→C∞(,∧l–)
is defined by averagingKyover all pointsy∈:Tω=
φ(y)Kyωdy, whereφ∈C∞ () is
normalized so thatφ(y)dy= . For each differential formu, we have the decomposition
u=d(Tu) +T(du) (.)
and
∇(Tu)p,B≤C|B|up,B and Tup,B≤C|B|diam(B)up,B. (.)
From [], p., we know that any open subsetinRnis the union of a sequence of cubes
Qk, whose sides are parallel to the axes, whose interiors are mutually disjoint, and whose
diameters are approximately proportional to their distances fromF, whereFis the com-plement ofinRn. Specifically, (i)=∞
k=Qk, (ii)Qj∩Qk=φifj=k, (iii) there exist two
constantsc,c> (we can takec= , andc= ), so thatcdiam(Qk)≤distance(Qk,F)≤
cdiam(Qk). Thus, the definition of the homotopy operatorT can be generalized to any
domaininRn: For anyx∈,x∈Q
k for somek. LetTQk be the homotopy operator
defined onQk(each cube is bounded and convex). Thus, we can define the homotopy
op-eratorT on any domainbyT= ∞
k=TQkχQk(x). The nonlinear partial differential
equation for differential forms
dA(x,du) =B(x,du) (.)
is called a non-homogeneousA-harmonic equation, whereA:× ∧l(Rn)→ ∧l(Rn) and
B:× ∧l(Rn)→ ∧l–(Rn) satisfy the conditions:
A(x,ξ)≤a|ξ|p–, A(x,ξ)·ξ≥ |ξ|p and B(x,ξ)≤b|ξ|p– (.)
forx∈a.e. and allξ∈ ∧l(Rn). Herep> is a constant related to the equation (.), and
a,b> . See [–] for recent results on theA-harmonic equations and related topics. As-sume that∧lis thelth exterior power of the cotangent bundle,C∞(∧l) is the space of
smoothl-forms onandW(∧l) ={u∈L
loc(∧l) :uhas generalized gradient}. The
har-monicl-fields are defined byH(∧l) ={u∈W(∧l) :du=du= ,u∈Lpfor some <
p<∞}. The orthogonal complement ofHin L is defined byH⊥={u∈L :u,h=
by assigningG(u) be the unique element ofH⊥∩C∞(∧l) satisfying Poisson’s equation
G(u) =u–H(u), whereHis the harmonic projection operator that mapsC∞(∧l) onto
Hso thatH(u) is the harmonic part ofu. See [] for more properties of these operators.
2 Local embedding theorem
The purpose of this section is to prove the localLϕ-embedding theorem and some related
Lϕ-norm inequalities that will be used to prove the global embedding theorem in the next
section. We first recall the following subclass of Young functions that can be found in [–].
Definition . A Young functionϕ: [,∞)−→[,∞) is said to be in the classNG(p,q) if
ϕsatisfies the nonstandard growth condition
pϕ(t)≤tϕ(t)≤qϕ(t), <p≤q<∞. (.)
The first inequality in (.) is equivalent to thatϕt(pt)is increasing, and the second inequality
in (.) is equivalent to-condition,i.e., for eacht> ,ϕ(t)≤Kϕ(t), whereK> , and
ϕ(t)
tq is decreasing witht. Also, condition (.) implies thatϕ(t) satisfies ctp–c≤ϕ(t)≤c
tq+ . (.)
Particularly,ϕ(t) =tp satisfies (.) because oftϕ(t) =pϕ(t), and this makes inequalities
with the norm · pbecome a special case of Theorem .; for more details see [] and
[].
An Orlicz function is a continuously increasing function ϕ : [,∞)→[,∞) with
ϕ() = . The Orlicz spaceLϕ() consists of all measurable functionsf onsuch that
ϕ( |f|
λ)dx<∞for someλ=λ(f) > .L
ϕ() is equipped with the nonlinear Luxemburg
functional
fLϕ()=inf λ> :
ϕ
|f| λ
dx≤
.
A convex Orlicz functionϕis often called a Young function. Ifϕis a Young function, then · Lϕ()defines a norm inLϕ(), which is called the Luxemburg norm or Orlicz norm.
For any subsetE⊂Rn, we useW,ϕ(E,∧l) to denote the Orlicz-Sobolev space ofl-forms
which equalsLϕ(E,∧l)∩Lϕ
(E,∧l) with norm
uW,ϕ(E)=uW,ϕ(E,∧l)=diam(E)–uLϕ(E)+∇uLϕ(E). (.)
If we chooseϕ(t) =tp,p> in (.), we obtain the usualLp-norm forW,p(E,∧l)
uW,p(E)=uW,p(E,∧l)=diam(E)–up,E+∇up,E. (.)
Lemma .[] Let u∈D(B,∧l)and du∈Lp(B,∧l+).Then u–u
B∈L
np
n–p(B,∧l),and
B
|u–uB|
np n–pdx
n–p np
≤c(n,p)
B
|du|pdx
p
(.)
for B is a ball or cube in,l= , , . . . ,n– and <p<n.
Lemma .[] Supposeϕis a continuous function in the class NG(p,q)with q(n–p) <np,
<p≤q<∞.For any t> ,setting
A(t) =
t
ϕ(s/q)
s n+q
q
ds, K(t) =(ϕ(t
/q))n+qq
tn/q . (.)
Then A(t)is a concave function,and there exists a constant C,such that
K(t)≤A(t)≤CK(t), ∀t> . (.)
Lemma .[] Let u be a differential form satisfying the non-homogeneous A-harmonic
equation(.)in,σ> and <s,t<∞.Then,there exists a constant C,independent of u,such thatus,B≤C|B|(t–s)/stut,σBfor all balls or cubes B withσB⊂.
We are ready to state our main localLϕ-embedding theorem as follows, which will be
used to prove the globalLϕ-embedding theorem in the next section.
Theorem . Let ϕ be a Young function in the class NG(p,q)with q(n–p) <np, <
p≤q<∞.be a bounded domain,u∈Lp(,∧l)be a solution of the non-homogeneous
A-harmonic equation,T be the homotopy operator and H be the projection operator.If
ϕ(|u|)∈Lloc (),then there exists a constant C,independent of u,such that
TH(u)–TH(u)BW,ϕ(B,∧l)≤C|B|uLϕ(σB) (.)
for all balls B withσB⊂,whereσ> is a constant.
In order to prove the above localLϕ-embedding theorem, we need to prove some local
Lϕ-norm inequalities. We begin with the following Poincaré-type inequality withLϕ-norm
first.
Theorem . Letϕbe a Young function in the class NG(p,q)with q(n–p) <np, <p≤ q<∞,be a bounded domain,u∈Lp(,∧l),T be the homotopy operator and H be the
projection operator.Ifϕ(|u|)∈L
loc(),then there exists a constant C,independent of u,
such that
TH(u)–TH(u)BLϕ(B)≤C|B|uLϕ(B) (.)
Proof First, we consider the case <p<n. By assumption, we haveq< nnp–p. Using the Poincaré-type inequality, Lemma . to differential formsT(H(u))
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bnp/(n–p)dx (n–p)/np
≤C
B
dTH(u)pdx /p
, (.)
we find that
B
T
H(u)–TH(u)Bqdx /q
≤C
B
d
TH(u)pdx /p
. (.)
It is well known that, for any differential formu,d(T(u)) =uB anduBp,B≤Cup,B.
Hence,
B
dTH(u)pdx /p
≤C
B
H(u)pdx /p
. (.)
Note that
G(u)p,B=dd+ddG(u)p,B≤Cup,B.
We have
H(u)p,B=u–G(u)p,B ≤ up,B+G(u)p,B
≤Cup,B. (.)
Combining (.), (.), and (.), we obtain
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx /q
≤C
B
|u|pdx /p
(.)
for <p<n. Next, for the case ofp≥n, since theLp-norm of|T(H(u)) – (T(H(u)))B|
increases withpandnnp–p → ∞asp→n. Then, there exists <p<nsuch thatq<nnp–p.
Hence, it follows that
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx /q
≤
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bnp/(n–p)dx
(n–p)/np
≤C
B
dTH(u)p
dx /p
≤C
B
dTH(u)pdx /p
≤C
B
|u|pdx /p
Hence, from (.) and (.), we obtain
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx /q
≤C
B
|u|pdx /p
(.)
for anyp> . Using the Hölder inequality with =nq+q+ n
n+q, we obtain
B
ϕTH(u)–TH(u)Bdx
=
B
ϕ(|T(H(u)) – (T(H(u)))B|)
|T(H(u)) – (T(H(u)))B|
nq n+q
TH(u)–TH(u)B
nq n+qdx
≤
B
ϕ(|T(H(u)) – (T(H(u)))B|)
n+q q
|T(H(u)) – (T(H(u)))B|n
dx q
n+q
×
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx n
n+q
.
Applying Lemma . and noticingA(t) is a concave function, we obtain
B
ϕTH(u)–TH(u)Bdx
≤
B
KTH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx q
n+q
B
T
H(u)–TH(u)Bqdx n
n+q
≤
B
ATH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx q
n+q
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx n
n+q
≤Anq+q
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx n
n+q
≤C(n,q)K
q n+q
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx
×
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx n
n+q
=C(n,q)
ϕ((B(|T(H(u)) – (T(H(u)))B|q)dx)/q)
(B(|T(H(u)) – (T(H(u)))B|q)dx)
n n+q
×
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx n
n+q
=C(n,q)ϕ
B
TH(u)–TH(u)Bqdx /q
. (.)
Note thatϕis increasing and satisfies-condition, substituting (.) into (.) gives
B
ϕTH(u)–TH(u)Bdx≤Cϕ
B
|u|pdx /p
Leth(t) =tϕ(ss)ds. From (.) we know thatϕ(t)/tqis decreasing witht, thus,
h(t) =
t
ϕ(s)
s ds=
t
ϕ(s)
sq s
q–ds≥ϕ(t)/tq
qs
q t
=
qϕ(t).
Similarly, using the fact thatϕ(t)/tpis increasing witht, we haveh(t)≤
pϕ(t). Therefore,
qϕ(t)≤h(t)≤
pϕ(t). (.)
Letg(t) =h(t/p), then (h(t/p))=
p
ϕ(t/p)
t is increasing. Hence,gis a convex function. From
the definitions ofgandhand using Jensen’s inequality tog, we have
h
B|
u|pdx /p
=g
B|
u|pdx
≤
B
g|u|pdx=
B
h|u|dx. (.)
Combining (.), (.), and (.), we have
B
ϕTH(u)–TH(u)Bdx
≤Cϕ
B
|u|pdx /p
≤Ch
B
|u|pdx /p
≤C
B
h|u|dx
≤C
B
ϕ|u|dx,
which indicates (.) holds. We have completed the proof of Theorem ..
Theorem . Let ϕ be a Young function in the class NG(p,q)with q(n–p) <np, <
p≤q<∞,be a bounded domain,u∈Lp(,∧l)be a solution of the non-homogeneous
A-harmonic equation,T be the homotopy operator and H be the projection operator.If
ϕ(|u|)∈Lloc (),then there exists a constant C,independent of u,such that
TdTH(u)Lϕ(B)≤C|B|uLϕ(σB)
for all balls B withσB⊂,whereσ> is a constant.
Proof For any differential formu, we havedT(u)q,B=uBq,B≤Cuq,B. From (.)
and (.), it follows that
TdTH(u)q,B≤C|B|diam(B)dTH(u)q,B
=C|B|diam(B)H(u)q,B
By Lemma . andp,q> , we have
uq,B≤C|B|(p–q)/pqup,σB, (.)
whereσ> . Combining (.) and (.) yields
TdTH(u)q,B≤C|B|(p–q)/pqup,σB. (.)
From the Hölder inequality with =n+qq+nn+q, we find that
B
ϕTdTH(u)dx
=
B
ϕTdTH(u)TdTH(u)–
nq
n+qTdTH(u) nq n+qdx
≤
B
ϕ(|TdTH(u)|)
n+q q
|TdTH(u)|n dx
q n+q
B
TdTH(u)qdx n
n+q
.
Using Lemma . and noticingA(t) is a concave function, we obtain
B
ϕTdTH(u)dx
≤
B
KTdTH(u)qdx q
n+q
B
TdTH(u)qdx n
n+q
≤
B
ATdTH(u)qdx q
n+q
B
TdTH(u)q
dx n
n+q
≤Anq+q
B
TdTH(u)qdx
B
TdTH(u)qdx n
n+q
≤CK
q n+q
B
TdTH(u)qdx
B
TdTH(u)qdx n
n+q
=C
ϕ((B(TdTH(u)q)dx)/q)
(B(|TdTH(u)|q)dx)n+nq
B
TdTH(u)qdx n
n+q
=Cϕ
B
TdTH(u)qdx /q
. (.)
Sinceϕis increasing and satisfies-condition, substituting (.) into (.), we have
B
ϕTdTH(u)dx≤Cϕ
σB
|u|pdx /p
. (.)
Starting from (.) and using the same discussion as we did in the proof of Theorem ., we obtain
B
ϕTdTH(u)dx≤C
σB
ϕ|u|dx.
From (.) and (.), we have
∇TdTH(u)q,B≤C|B|dTH(u)q,B
=C|B|H(u)
Bq,B
≤C|B|H(u)q,B
≤C|B|uq,B. (.)
Using (.) and the similar techniques to the ones developed in the proof of Theorem ., we obtain the followingLϕ-norm estimate.
Theorem . Letϕbe a Young function in the class NG(p,q)with q(n–p) <np, <p≤ q<∞,be a bounded domain,and u∈Lp(,∧l)be a solution of the non-homogeneous
A-harmonic equation,T be the homotopy operator and H be the projection operator.If
ϕ(|u|)∈L
loc(),then there exists a constant C,independent of u,such that
∇TdTH(u)Lϕ(B)≤C|B|uLϕ(σB) (.)
for all balls B withσB⊂,whereσ> is a constant.
Proof of Theorem. By definition (.), Theorem . and Theorem ., we have
TH(u)–TH(u)BW,ϕ(B,∧l)
=TdTH(u)W,ϕ(B,∧l)
=diam(B)–TdTH(u)Lϕ(B)+∇TdTH(u)Lϕ(B)
≤diam(B)–C|B|diam(B)uLϕ(σB)+C|B|uLϕ(σB)
≤C|B|uLϕ(σB), (.)
whereσ=max{σ,σ}. We have completed the proof of Theorem ..
3 Global embedding theorem
In this section, we prove our main result, the globalLϕ-embedding theorem for the
so-lutions of the non-homogeneousA-harmonic equation. We will use the following well-known covering lemma.
Lemma . Each domainhas a modified Whitney cover of cubesV={Qi}such that
i
Qi=,
Qi∈V χ
Qi≤Nχ
and some N > ,and if Qi∩Qj=∅,then there exists a cube R(this cube need not be a
member ofV)in Qi∩Qjsuch that Qi∪Qj⊂NR.Moreover,ifisδ-John,then there is a
distinguished cube Q∈Vwhich can be connected with every cube Q∈Vby a chain of cubes
We are ready to prove the following globalLϕ-embedding theorem with theLϕ-norm
now.
Theorem . Letϕbe a Young function in the class NG(p,q)with q(n–p) <np, <p≤
q<∞,u∈Lp(,∧l)be a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation,T be the
homotopy operator and H be the projection operator.Ifϕ(|u|)∈L(),then there exists a
constant C,independent of u,such that
TH(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ(,∧l)≤CuLϕ() (.)
for a bounded domain⊂Rn.
Proof From the Lemma . and Theorem ., we have
∇TdTH(u)Lϕ()≤
B∈V
∇TdTH(u)Lϕ(B)
≤
B∈V
C|B|uLϕ(σB)
≤CNuLϕ()
≤CuLϕ(). (.)
Similarly, from Theorem . and Lemma ., it follows that
Td
TH(u)Lϕ()≤
B∈V Td
TH(u)Lϕ(B)
≤
B∈V
Cdiam(B)uLϕ(σB)
≤Cdiam()NuLϕ()
≤Cdiam()uLϕ(). (.)
Using (.), (.), and (.), we find that
TH(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ()
=TdTH(u)W,ϕ()
=diam()–TdTH(u)Lϕ()+∇Td
TH(u)Lϕ()
≤diam()–Cdiam()uLϕ()+CuLϕ()
≤CuLϕ(). (.)
We have completed the proof of Theorem ..
Choosingϕ(t) =tplogα
+tin Theorems ., we have the following embedding inequality
with theLp(logα
Corollary . Letϕ(t) =tplogα
+t, p≥,α∈R, u∈Lp(,∧l)be a solution of the
non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation,T be the homotopy operator,and H be the projection
operator.Ifϕ(|u|)∈L(),then there exists a constant C,independent of u,such that
TH(u)–TH(u)W,tplogα+t()≤CuLtplogα+t() (.)
for any bounded domain.
Letϕ(t) =tp in Theorem .. Then, we obtain the following version of the embedding
inequality withLp-norms.
Corollary . Letϕ(t) =tp, p≥,u∈Lp(,∧l)be a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation,T be the homotopy operator,and H be the projection operator.If ϕ(|u|)∈L(),then there exists a constant C,independent of u,such that
TH(u)–TH(u)W,p()≤Cup,
holds for any bounded domain.
Similarly, Theorem . can be extended into the following global Poincaré-type inequal-ity withLϕ-norm.
Theorem . Letϕbe a Young function in the class NG(p,q)with q(n–p) <np, <p≤ q<∞,u∈Lp(,∧l)be a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation,T be the
homotopy operator and H be the projection operator.Ifϕ(|u|)∈L(),then there exists a
constant C,independent of u,such that
TH(u)–TH(u)Lϕ()≤Cdiam()uLϕ() (.)
for any bounded domain.
Proof From (.) and Theorem ., we have
TH(u)–TH(u)Lϕ()
=diam()diam()–TH(u)–TH(u)Lϕ()
≤diam()diam()–TH(u)–TH(u)Lϕ()
+∇TH(u)–TH(u)Lϕ()
=Cdiam()T
H(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ(,∧l)
≤Cdiam()uLϕ().
4 Applications
As applications of our main results established in the previous sections, we consider the following examples.
Example . Assume thatr> andk> are any constants and={(x,x,x) :x+x+
x
≤r} ⊂R. Consider the -form
u(x,x,x) =
x
k+x
+x+x
dx+
x
k+x
+x+x
dx+
x
k+x
+x+x
dx (.)
defined in. It is easy to check thatdu= . Hence,uis a solution of the non-homogeneous
A-harmonic equation (.) for any operatorsAandBsatisfying (.). Also, it can be cal-culated that
|u|=
x
k+x+x+x
+
x
k+x+x+x
+
x
k+x+x+x /
=
x
+x+x
(k+x
+x+x)
/
< . (.)
Using (.) and (.), we find that
TH(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ()≤CuLϕ()≤CLϕ(),
that is,
TH(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ()≤C
ϕ
λ
dx≤Cr.
We should notice that the above example can be extended to the case ofRn. Specifically,
we can check that the -form defined inRn
u(x, . . . ,xn) = n
i=
xi
k+x+· · ·+x
n
dxi, k> (.)
is a solution of the non-homogeneousA-harmonic equation (.) for any operatorsAand
Bsatisfying (.). Hence, Theorem . is applicable tou(x, . . . ,xn) as we did in Example ..
Finally, we consider the following example inR.
Example . Let={(x,y,z) :x+y+z≤} ⊂Randu(x,y,z) be defined inRby
u(x,y,z) =ex+y+z(x dx+y dy+z dz).
It is easy to check thatdu= . Hence,uis a solution of the non-homogeneousA-harmonic equation (.) for any operators A and Bsatisfying (.) in R. For any bounded
do-main in R, it would be very complicated if we calculate the integral T(H(u)) –
(T(H(u)))W,ϕ()directly. However, using the embedding inequality (.), we can easily
that
u(x,y,z)=ex+y+zx+ex+y+zy+ex+y+zz/
=e(x+y+z)x+y+z/
≤e·/=e. (.)
From (.) and (.), we have
TH(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ()≤CuLϕ()≤CeLϕ(),
which is equal to
TH(u)–TH(u)W,ϕ()≤C
ϕ
e λ
dx≤C.
Remark (i) From inequalities (.), (.), and (.), we find that the compositionsTH,
TdTH and∇TdTH are bounded operators onLp(,∧l). (ii) Note that our global
embed-ding theorem holds on any bounded domains. Hence, the theorem is true ifis one of the bounded John domains, Lp-averaging domains orLϕ(μ)-averaging domains. See [,
, ] for more properties of these kinds of domains.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
Authors’ contributions
All authors worked together on the research and writing of this manuscript. JN carried out the proofs of all research results in this manuscript, and wrote its draft. SD and YX proposed the study, participated in its design and revised its final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China.2Department of Mathematics,
Seattle University, Seattle, WA 98122, USA.
Received: 14 August 2015 Accepted: 1 November 2015
References
1. Agarwal, RP, Ding, S, Nolder, CA: Inequalities for Differential Forms. Springer, Berlin (2009)
2. Xing, Y, Wu, C: Global weighted inequalities for operators and harmonic forms on manifolds. J. Math. Anal. Appl.294, 294-309 (2004)
3. Bi, H: Weighted inequalities for potential operators on differential forms. J. Inequal. Appl. (2010). doi:10.1155/2010/713625
4. Bi, H, Ding, S: Some strong (p,q)-type inequalities for the homotopy operator. Comput. Math. Appl.62, 1780-1789 (2011)
5. Ding, S, Liu, B: A singular integral of the composite operator. Appl. Math. Lett.22, 1271-1275 (2009)
6. Ding, S, Liu, B: Global estimates for singular integrals of the composite operator. Ill. J. Math.53, 1173-1185 (2009) 7. Bi, H, Ding, S: Orlicz norm inequalities for the composite operator and applications. J. Inequal. Appl. (2011).
doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2011-69
8. Cartan, H: Differential Forms. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1970)
9. Iwaniec, T, Lutoborski, A: Integral estimates for null Lagrangians. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.125, 25-79 (1993) 10. Stein, EM: Harmonic Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)
11. Ding, S: Two-weight Caccioppoli inequalities for solutions of nonhomogeneousA-harmonic equations on Riemannian manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.132, 2367-2375 (2004)
12. Ding, S, Liu, B: Norm inequalities for composition of Dirac and Green’s operators. J. Inequal. Appl. (2013). doi:10.1186/1029-242x-2013-436
13. Wang, Y, Wu, C: Sobolev embedding theorems and Poincaré inequalities for Green’s operator on solutions of the nonhomogeneousA-harmonic equation. Comput. Math. Appl.47, 1545-1554 (2004)
14. Liu, B:Aλ
r()-Weighted imbedding inequalities for A-harmonic tensors. J. Math. Anal. Appl.273, 667-676 (2002)
15. Wang, Y: Two-weight Poincaré type inequalities for differential forms inLs(μ)-averaging domains. Appl. Math. Lett.
16. Xing, Y: Weighted Poincaré-type estimates for conjugate A-harmonic tensors. J. Inequal. Appl. (2005). doi:10.1155/JIA.2005.1
17. Xing, Y: Weighted integral inequalities for solutions of theA-harmonic equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl.279, 350-363 (2003)
18. Scott, C:Lp-Theory of differential forms on manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.347, 2075-2096 (1995)
19. Fusco, N, Sbordone, C: Higher integrability of the gradient of minimizers of functionals with nonstandard growth conditions. Commun. Pure Appl. Math.43, 673-683 (1990)
20. Sbordone, C: Maximal inequalities and applications to regularity problems in the calculus of variations. Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser.326, 230-244 (1995)
21. Lu, Y, Bao, G: Poincaré inequality and the sharp maximal inequalities withLϕ-norms for differential forms. J. Inequal.
Appl. (2013). doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2013-400
22. Staples, SG:Lp-Averaging domains and the Poincaré inequality. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Ser. A 1 Math.14, 103-127
(1989)