• No results found

Boundedness of Fractional Integral with Variable Kernel and Their Commutators on Variable Exponent Herz Spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Boundedness of Fractional Integral with Variable Kernel and Their Commutators on Variable Exponent Herz Spaces"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.710104

How to cite this paper: Abdalmonem, A., Abdalrhman, O. and Tao, S.P. (2016) Boundedness of Fractional Integral with Va-riable Kernel and Their Commutators on VaVa-riable Exponent Herz Spaces. Applied Mathematics, 7, 1165-1182.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.710104

Boundedness of Fractional Integral with

Variable Kernel and Their Commutators on

Variable Exponent Herz Spaces

Afif Abdalmonem

1,2

, Omer Abdalrhman

1,3

, Shuangping Tao

1*

1College of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China 2Faculty of Science, University of Dalanj, Dalanj, Sudan

3College of Education, Shendi University, Shendi, Sudan

Received 25 April 2016; accepted 26 June 2016; published 29 June 2016

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

In this paper, we study the boundedness of the fractional integral operator and their commutator on Herz spaecs with two variable exponents p

( ) ( )

,q. By using the properties of the variable ex-ponents Lebesgue spaces, the boundedness of the fractional integral operator and their commu-tator generated by Lipschitz function is obtained on those Herz spaces.

Keywords

Fractional Integral, Variable Kernel, Commutator, Variable Exponent, Lipschitz Space, Herz Spaces

1. Introduction

Let 0< <

µ

n, Ω ∈L

( ) ( )

n ×L Sr n−1

(

r1

)

is homogenous of degree zero on n , n1

S − denotes the unit sphere in n. If

(i) For any x z, n, one has

(

x,λz

)

= Ω

( )

x z, ;

(ii)

( ) ( )

1

(

1

(

)

( )

)

1

: sup , d

n r n n

n

r r

L L S s

x

x z σ z

× − −

′ ′

=

Ω < ∞

The fractional integral operator with variable kernel T,µ is defined by

(2)

( )

(

) ( )

,

,

d ,

n n

x x y

T f x f y y

x y

µ µ

Ω −

Ω −

=

The commutators of the fractional integral is defined by

( )

(

) ( ) ( )

(

)

( )

,

,

, n d ,

m m

n

x x y

b T f x b x b y f y y

x y

µ µ

Ω −

Ω −

  = −

 

When

µ

≡1, the above integral takes the Cauchy principal value. At this time

µ

≡0, T,µ is much more

close related to the elliptic partial equations of the second order with variable coefficients. Now we need the further assumption for Ω

( )

x z, . It satisfies

(

) ( )

1 , d 0,

n

n s−Ω x z′ σ z′ = ∀ ∈x

For r≥1, we say Kernel function Ω

( )

x z, satisfies the Lr-Dini condition, if Ω meets the conditions (i), (ii) and

( )

1

0 d

r ω δ

δ δ < ∞

where ω δr

( )

denotes the integral modulus of continuity of order r of Ω defined by

( )

(

1

(

)

(

)

( )

)

1

,

sup n , , d

n

r r

r s

x

x z x z z

ρ δ

ω δ − ρ σ

∈ <

′ ′ ′

=

Ω − Ω

where

ρ

is the a rotation in n

1 sup

n

z S

z z

ρ ρ

′∈

′ ′

= −

when Ω ≡1, T,µ is the fraction integral operator

( )

( )

, n n d .

f y

T f x y

x y

µ µ

Ω = −

The corresponding fractional maximal operator with variable kernel is defined by

( )

(

)

,

0

1

sup n , d .

x y r r

M f x x x y y

r

µ µ

Ω = >

− < Ω −

We can easily find that when Ω ≡1 MΩ,µ is just the fractional maximal operator

( )

( )

,

0

1

sup n d

x y r r

M f x f y y

r

µ µ

Ω − − < >

=

Especially, in the case

µ

≡0, the fractional maximal operator reduces the Hardy-Littelewood maximal operator.

Many classical results about the fractional integral operator with variable kernel have been achieved [1]-[5]. In 1971, Muckenhoupt and Wheeden [6] had proved the operator T,µ was bounded from

p

L to Lq. In 1991, Kováčik and Rákosník [7] introduced variable exponents Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces as a new method for dealing with nonlinear Dirichet boundary value problem. In the last 20 years, more and more researchers have been interested in the theory of the variable exponent function space and its applications [8]-[14]. In 2012, Wu Huiling and Lan Jiacheng [15] proved the bonudedness property of T,µ with a rough kernel on variable

exponents Lebesgue spaces.

Recently, Wang and Tao [16] introduced the class of Herz spaces with two variable exponents, and also studied the Parameterized Littlewood-Paley operators and their commutators on Herz spaces with variable exponents.

The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the boundedness of the fractional integral with variable kernel ,

TΩµ and their commutators , ,

m

b TΩµ

 

(3)

Throughout this paper E denotes the Lebesgue measure, χE means he characteristic function of a measurable set S⊂n. C always means a positive constant independent of the main parameters and may change from one occurrence to another.

2. Definition of Function Spaces with Variable Exponent

In this section we define the Lebesgue spaces with variable exponent and Herz spaces with two variable ex- ponent, and also define the mixed Lebesgue sequence spaces.

Let E be a measurable set in n with E >0. We first define the Lebesgue spaces with variable exponent. Definition 2.1. see [1] Let p

( )

⋅ :E

[

1,∞

)

be a measurable function. The Lebesgue space with variable exponent Lp( )⋅

( )

E is defined by

( )

( )

( )

( )

is measurable : d for some constant 0

p x p

E

f x

L E f x η

η

=  < ∞ > 

   

The space Lploc( )⋅

( )

E is defined by

( )

( )

{

is measurable : ( )

( )

for all compact

}

p p

loc

LE = f fLK KE

The Lebesgue spaces Lp( )⋅

( )

E is a Banach spaces with the norm defined by

( )( )

( )

( )

inf 0 : d 1

p

p x

L E E

f x

f η x

η ⋅

 

=  >  ≤ 

   

We denote

( )

{

}

essinf : ,

p= p x xE p+ =esssup

{

p x

( )

:xE

}

. Then 

( )

E consists of all p

( )

⋅ satisfying p−>1 and p+ < ∞.

Let M be the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator. We denote B

( )

E to be the set of all function

( )

( )

p ⋅ ∈ E satisfying the M is bounded on Lp( )⋅

( )

E .

Definition 2.2. see [17] Let p

( ) ( )

⋅ ,q ⋅ ∈

( )

E . The mixed Lebesgue sequence space with variable exponent

( )

( )

( )

q p

lL ⋅ is the collection of all sequences

{ }

0 j j

f= of the measurable functions on n such that

{ }

0 ( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

0

inf 0 : q p 1

q p

j j j

l L l L

j

f

f η Q

µ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

∞ ∞

=

=

    

= >  < ∞

 

 

( )

( )

( )

(

{ }

)

( )

( ) ( )

1 0

0

inf ; n d 1

q p

p x

j

j j j R

l L

j q x

j

f x

Q f µ x

µ ⋅ ⋅

∞ ∞

= =

 

=    ≤ 

 

   

 

Noticing q+< ∞, we see that

( )

( )

( )

(

{ }

)

( )

( ) ( )

0 0

p q p

q

q

j j j

l L L

j

Q f f

⋅ ⋅

∞ ⋅

= =

=

Let

{

n: 2k

}

, \ 1, ,

k k k k k Ck

B = x∈ xC =B B χ =χ k∈

Definition 2.3. see [16] Let α∈,p

( ) ( )

⋅ ,q ⋅ ∈

( )

n . The homogeneous Herz space with variable ex- ponent ( ),q( )

( )

n

p

Kα ⋅  is defined by

( )( )

( )

{

( )

(

{ }

)

( ),( )

( )

}

,

\ 0 : q n

p

q n p n

Loc

p K

Kα f L f α ⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ = ∈   < ∞

(4)

( )( )

( )

{

}

( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

,

0

2

2 inf 0 : 1

q n

p q p

p

q

q k

k k

k

K k

l L k

L

f

f α f

α

α χ η χ

η ⋅

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

⋅ ∞

= =−∞

 

= =  >  ≤ 

   

 

 

Remark 2.1. see [16] (1) If q1

( ) ( )

⋅ ,q2 ⋅ ∈

( )

n satisfying

( ) ( )

1 2

q +q +, then

( ),q1( )

( )

n ( ),q2( )

( )

n

p p

Kα ⋅  ⊂Kα ⋅ 

(2) If q1

( ) ( )

,q2 ⋅ ∈

( )

n and

( ) ( )

1 2

q +q +, then

( )

( )

( )

2

1

n

q q

⋅ ∈

⋅   and

( )

( )

2

1 1

q q

⋅ ≥

⋅ . Thus, by Lemma 3.7 and Remark 2.2, for any ( ),q( )

( )

n

p

fKα ⋅  , we have

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )( )

*

2 1 1

1

2 1

( )

2 2 2

1

h h

p

p p

q

q q

p

p p

q q q

k k k

k k k

k k k

L

L L

f f f

α χ α χ α χ

η ⋅ η ⋅ η ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

∞ ∞ ∞

=−∞ =−∞ =−∞

 

     

≤ ≤ ≤

       

     

 

     

where

( )

( )

( )

( )

2

1

2

1

2

, 1

2

, 1

k k

h k

k

f q

q p

f q

q

α

α

χ η

χ η

+

 ⋅ 

≤ 

 

=   ⋅ 

>

 



 

0 *

0 min , 1 max , 1

h h

h

h

h h

h

h

p a p

p a

=

=

 = 

>



This implies that ( ),q1( )

( )

n ( ),q2( )

( )

n

p p

Kα ⋅  ⊂Kα ⋅  . Remark 2.2. Let h∈,ah≥0,1≤ph< ∞. then

*

0 0

p

h h

h h

a a

∞ ∞

= =

 

≤ 

where

0 *

0 min , 1 max , 1

h h

h h

h h

h

h

p a p

p a

=

=

 = 

>



Definition 2.4. see [18] For 0< ≤

β

1, the Lipschitz space

( )

n

Lipβ  is defined by

( )

( )

( )

, ,

: sup

n

n

Lip

x y x y

f x f y

Lip f f

x y

β

β β

∈ ≠

 − 

 

= = < ∞

 

  

 (1.1)

3. Properties of Variable Exponent

In this section we state some properties of variable exponent belonging to the class

( )

n

B and

( ) ( )

n r n1

LL S

Ω ∈ × .

Proposition 3.1. see [1] If

( )

( )

n

p ⋅ ∈  satisfies

( )

( )

(

)

, 1 2

log

C

p x p y x y x y

− ≤ − ≤

(5)

( )

( )

(

)

, log

C

p x p y y x e x

− ≤ ≥

+ then, we have

( )

( )

n

p ⋅ ∈B  .

Proposition 3.2. see [15] Suppose that p1

( )

⋅ ∈B

( )

n , Ω ∈L

( ) ( )

n ×L Sr n−1 . Let

( )

1

0 n

p

µ

+

< ≤ , and

define the variable exponent p2

( )

⋅ by:

( )

( )

1 2

1 1

=

p x p x n

µ

− . Then we have that for all fLp1( )⋅

( )

n ,

( )

( )

1( )

( )

2

, Lp n Lp n

Tµfc f

Proposition 3.3. Suppose that 1

( )

( )

n

p ⋅ ∈B  ,

( )

n

bLipβ  , 0< ≤

β

1, Ω ∈L

( ) ( )

n ×L Sr n−1 . Let

( )

1

0 m n

p

µ β

+

< + ≤ , and define the variable exponent p2

( )

⋅ by:

( )

( )

1 2

1 1 m

p x p x n

µ+ β

− = . Then

( )

( )

1( )

( )

2

,

, p n p n

m m

Lip L L

b T f C b f

β

µ

  ≤

 

Proof

( )

(

) ( ) ( )

(

)

( )

(

) ( ) ( )

(

)

( )

(

) ( )

( )

,

,

,

, d

,

d

,

d

n

n

n

m m

n

m n

n m Lip

m Lip

x x y

b T f x b x b y f y y

x y

x x y

b x b y f y y

x y

x x y

C b f y y

x y

C b T f

β

β

µ µ

µ

µ β

µ β

Ω −

− −

Ω +

Ω −

  = −

 

Ω −

≤ −

Ω −

− ≤

By Proposition 3.2, we get

( )

( )

( )

( ) 1( )

( )

2 2

, ,

, p n p p n .

m m

m

Lip Lip L

L L

b T f C b T f C b f

β β

µ µ β

Ω Ω +

  ≤ ≤

 

Now, we need recall some lemmas

Lemma 3.1. see [13] Given

( )

: n

[

1,

)

p ⋅  → ∞ have that for all function f and g,

( ) ( )

d p( )

( )

n p( )

( )

n

n f x g x xC f Lg L′⋅

  

Lemma 3.2. see [19] Suppose that 0< <µ n, r>1, Ω ∈L

( ) ( )

n ×L Sr n−1 satisfies the r

L -Dini con- dition. If there exists an 0<α0<1 2 such that y0R then

(

)

( )

( )

1

2

2

, ,

d d

r r

n n y R

r r

n n

R x R

y R

y x x y x x

x CR

R x y x

µ

µ µ

ω δ δ δ

− +     

− −

< <

+

 

 

Lemma 3.3. see [20] Suppose that x∈n, the variable function q x

( )

is defined by

( )

( )

1 1 1

p x = +q q x ,

then for all measurable function f and g, we have

( ) ( )

p( )

( )

n

( )

q

( )

n

( )

q( )

( )

n

L L L

f x g xC g x f x ⋅

Lemma 3.4. see [21] Suppose that p

( )

⋅ ∈B

( )

n

(6)

1) For any cube and 2n

Q ≤ , all the

χ

Q, then: p( ) 1p x( )

Q L Q

χ ⋅ ≈ 2) For any cube and Q ≥1, then p( ) 1

p Q L Q

χ ∞

⋅ ≈ where

( )

limx

p = →∞ p x

Lemma 3.5. see [22] If

( )

( )

n

p ⋅ ∈B  , then there exist constants δ δ1, 2,C>0 such that for all balls B in n

 and all measurable subset SR

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

1 1

1

2 1

1

, ,

p n p n

p

p n n

p n

p n

S

B L L

S L B L

S L

B L

B S

C C

S B

S C

B

δ

δ

χ χ

χ χ

χ χ

⋅ ⋅

′ ⋅ ⋅

 

≤ ≤ 

 

  ≤   

 

 

 

Lemma 3.6. see [13] If p

( )

⋅ ∈B

( )

n , there exist a constant C>0 such that for any balls B in n. we have

( )

( )

( )

( )

1

p n p n

B L B L C

B χ ⋅  χ ′⋅  ≤

Lemma 3.7. see [16] Let p

( ) ( )

⋅ ,q ⋅ ∈

( )

n . If fLp( ) ( )⋅q⋅ , then

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

(

)

( ) ( )

(

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

)

min p q , p q max p q , p q

p

q q q q q

L L L L L

f +⋅ ⋅ f −⋅ ⋅ f f +⋅ ⋅ f −⋅ ⋅

≤ ≤

4. Main Theorems and Their Proof

Theorem 1. Suppose that 0< <

µ

n, µ−nδ2< <α nδ1, Ω ∈L

( ) ( )(

n ×L Sr n−1 r>p2+

)

,

( ) ( )

( )

1 , 2

n

qq ⋅ ∈  with

( ) ( )

q2 q1 +. And let p1

( )

⋅ ∈B

( )

n satisfy

( )

1

0 n

p

µ

+

< ≤ and define the vari-

able exponent p2

( )

x by

( )

( )

1 2

1 1

p x p x n

µ

− = . Then the operators T,µ is bounded from 1( )1( )

( )

,q n

p

Kα ⋅  to

( )2( )

( )

2

,q n

p

Kα ⋅  .

Theorem 2. Let b Lip

( )

n , .m

β

Suppose that 0< <µ n,

(

µ+mβ

)

nδ2 < <α nδ1,

( ) ( )(

1

)

2

n r n

LL Sr p+

Ω ∈  × > , q1

( ) ( )

,q2 ⋅ ∈

( )

n with

( ) ( )

2 1

q q +. If p1

( )

⋅ ∈B

( )

n satisfy

( )

1

0 m n

p

µ β

+

< + ≤ and define the variable exponent p2

( )

x by

( )

( )

1 2

1 1 m

p x p x n

µ+ β

− = . Then the com- mutators bm,T,µ is bounded from 1( )1( )

( )

,q n

p

Kα ⋅  to ( )2( )

( )

2

,q n

p

Kα ⋅  .

Proof of Theorem1: Let ( )1( )

( )

1

,q n p

fKα ⋅  . We write

( )

( )

j j

( )

j j

f x f x χ f x

∞ ∞

=−∞ =−∞

=

=

From definition of ( ),q( )

( )

n p

Kα ⋅ 

( )( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

2

, 2

2 2

2

, ,

2

, q n inf 0 : 1

p p

q q k

k K

k

L

T f T f α

α µ µ

χ η

η ⋅

⋅ ⋅

=−∞

=  > ≤ 

   

 

(7)

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2

2 2

,

2

, ,

11 12 13 11

1

, ,

1 2

12 13

2

2 2

2 2

p q

p p

q q

p q q

k

k

L

q q

k

k k

j k j k

j j

L L

q k

k k

j k j k

j k j k

L

T f

T f T f

T f T f

α µ

α α

µ µ

α α

µ µ

χ η

χ χ

η η η η

χ χ

η η

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ Ω

⋅ ⋅

∞ −

Ω Ω

=−∞ =−∞

+ ∞

Ω Ω

= − = +

 

 

 

 

   

   

   

+ +

   

   

   

  

 

 

+ +

 

 

 

( )

( ) ( )

2

2 2

p q q

L ⋅ ⋅

 

 

 

 

 

 

where

( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2

2

11 2 ,

q p

k k

j k j

k l L

T f

α µ

η χ

⋅ ⋅

∞ −

=−∞ =−∞

 

 

=  

 

( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2

1

12 ,

1

2

q p

k k

j k j k

k l L

T f

α

µ

η χ

⋅ ⋅

∞ +

= − =−∞

 

 

=  

 

( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2

13 ,

2

2

q p

k

j k j k

k

l L

T f

α

µ

η χ

⋅ ⋅

∞ ∞

= + =−∞

 

 

=  

 

And η η= 111213, thus

( )

( )

( ) ( )

2

2 2

,

2

p q

q k

j k

k

L

T f

C

α

µ χ

η ⋅

=−∞

 

 

 

 

That is

( )

( )( )

( )

[

]

, 2 2

, q n 11 12 13 .

p K

T µ f α ⋅ Cη C η η η

≤ = + +

This implies only to prove

( )( )

( )

, 1 1

11, 12, 13 q n

p

K

C f α

η η η

. Denote

( )( )

( )

, 1 1

1 q n

p

K

f α

η

=

Now we consider η12. Applying Lemma 3.7

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

1

2 2

2

2 2

1 2

2

1 1

, ,

1 1

1 1

1

,

1 1

2 2

2 p

p q

p

q q k

k k

k k

j k j k

j k j k

k k

L L

q k k

k

j k

k j k

L

T f T f

C

T f C

α α

µ µ

α µ

χ χ

η η

χ η ⋅

⋅ ⋅

+ +

Ω Ω

= −= −

=−∞ =−∞

∞ +

=−∞ = −

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8)

where

( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

2

2 2

2

2 2

1

, 1 2

1

1 2

1

, 1 2

1 2

, 1

2

, 1

p q

p q q k

k

j k j k

L q k

k

j k j k

L

T f q

q k

T f q

α

µ

α

µ

χ

η

χ

η

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ +

Ω = − −

⋅ +

Ω = − +

 

 = 

  

  

   >

  

 

By the Proposition 3.2, we get

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

2

1 2

1 2

2

1

, 1

1

1

1 1

2

2

p p

q

q k

k

q k k

j k k

j k j

k k j k

L

L

T f

f C

α

α µ χ

η η

⋅ ⋅

⋅ +

= − ∞ +

=−∞ =−∞ = −

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

∑ ∑

Since ( )1( )

( )

1

,q n p

fKα ⋅  , then we have

( )

1

2

1

p

j j

L

f

α χ

η ≤ , and

( )

( ) ( )

1

1 1

1 2

1 p q q j

j j

L

f

α χ

η ⋅

⋅ ∞

=−∞

 

  ≤

 

 

By Lemma 3.7 and Remark 2.2, we get

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

2 1

2

1 1

1 1 2

2

*

1

1

1

1

, 1

1 1

1 2

2

2

p q p

q

p q q

k q k

k

q q

j k k

j k k

k k L

L L

q q

k k k

L L

T f

f C

f

C C

α

µ α

α

χ

χ

η η

χ η

+

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ +

⋅ Ω

= −

=−∞ =−∞

⋅ ∞

=−∞

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 

 

 

Hence

( ) ( )

( )

1

1 , 2 2

p + p q k, and

( )

( )

1 2 *

1 min

k

q k q

q

+

=

 , this implies that

( )( )

( )

, 1 1

12 1 q n

p

K

C C f α

η

η

≤ ≤

Now, we estimate of η11 using size condition of fj and Minkowski inequality, when j≤ −k 1 we get,

( )

( )

( )

( ) (

)

( )

( )

( )

2

2

,

, ,

d

p n j

p n

j k L B j n n k

L

x x y x x

T f f y y

x y x

µ χ ⋅ µ µ χ

Ω − −

Ω − Ω

≤ −

(9)

Since r> p2+ we define the variable exponent

( )

( )

2 2

1 1 1

p x = +r px , by Lemma 3.3 we get

(

)

( )

( )

( )

(

)

( )

( )

( )

( )

(

)

( )

( )

( )

( )

2

2

2

, , , ,

, ,

p x n r n

p n

p x n k r n

k k

n n n n L

L L

B

n n L

L

x x y x x x x y x x

x y x x y x

x x y x x x y x

µ µ µ µ

µ µ

χ χ

χ ⋅

− − − −

− −

Ω − Ω Ω − Ω

− ≤ −

− −

Ω − Ω

≤ −

 

 

According Lemma 3.4 and the formula

( )

( )

2 2

1 1 1

px = p xr, then we have

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2 1

1 1

p x n p x n p x n

k k k

r r n

B L B L Bk B L Bk

µ

χ χ − χ −−

≈ ≈

(1.2)

By Lemma 3.2, we get

(

)

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

1

2

1 2

1

0

1

, ,

d 2

2 1 d

2

k

k r n

n y

n

r r

n n k

y L

n n

j k r

r

n

k n

r

y

x x y x x

CR

x y x

CR

C

µ

µ µ

µ β

µ

ω δ δ δ

ω δ δ δ −

− +     

− − −

− +     

  −  − + 

 

Ω − Ω

− ≤ +

 

 

≤  + 

 

It follows that

( )

2( )

( )

( )

1( )

( )

, p n 2 j d k p x n

kn

j k B j B L

L

T µ f χ ⋅ C f y y χ

(1.3)

By the Equation (1.3) and using Lemmas 3.1, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, we can obtain

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

2

2 2

2

2 2

2 2

2 2

1 1 1( )

1 1

2 2

, ,

1 1

2 2

1 1

2 2

2 2 2 2

p

p q

p p p

j k

p

n n

q q k

k k

k k

j k j k

j j

k k

L L

q k q k

k k

j j

k kn k kn

k L B L B L

k j L k j L

T f T f

C

f f

C C

α α

µ µ

α α

χ χ

η η

χ χ χ

η η

⋅ ⋅

′ ⋅

− −

Ω Ω

=−∞=−∞

=−∞ =−∞

∞ − ∞ −

− −

=−∞ =−∞ =−∞ =−∞

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

   

≤ ≤

   

   

 

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2

2 2

1 1

1 1 1

2 2

1 1

1

1 1

2 2

1 1

1

2

1

2 2 2

2 2

p j

p n p p n

k

p q n

q k q k

k B k

j j k n j

k L k

k j L B k j L

L

q k

q q

j k

j k j k n

k j

L

f f

C C

f C

δ

α α

α δ α

χ

η χ η

χ η

′ ⋅

′ ⋅

+

⋅ ⋅

∞ − ∞ −

=−∞ =−∞ =−∞ =−∞

⋅ ∞ −

− − =−∞ =−∞

   

   

   

   

 

 

   

   

 

 

 

∑ ∑

 

(10)

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 , 2 1 2 2 2 , 2 1 2

, 1

2

, 1

p q p q q k k j k j L q k k j k j L T f q q k T f q α µ α µ χ η χ η ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ − Ω =−∞ − ⋅ − Ω =−∞ +  ≤      =       

   >

    

Since ( )1( )

( )

1

,q n p

fKα ⋅  , then we have

( ) 1 2 1 p j j L f α χ η ⋅

≤ , and

( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 1 2 1 p q q j j j L f α χ η ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ∞ =−∞     ≤    

Now if

( )

q1 + <1, then we have

( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( )( ) 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 * 1 1 1 1 2 , 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 p q n p

q

p q n

q k q k q k q j

j k k

j k

j j k n

k k j

L L

q q

j

j k j k n

j k j

L T f f C f C C α α µ δ α α δ α χ χ η η χ η + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ Ω ∞ =−∞ ∞ − − − =−∞ =−∞ =−∞ ⋅ ∞ ∞ − − =−∞ = +                         ≤   ≤        

∑ ∑

 

where

( )

( )

2 2 * 1 min k q k q q ∈ + = 

If

( )

q1 + ≥1, then we have

( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )( )(( ) )

( )

( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 p q

p q n

p q k k j k j k L q k q q q q j q q

k j k n k j k n

j k

k j j

L q j j k j L T f f C f C α µ α

δ α δ α

α χ η χ η χ η ⋅ ⋅ + + + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ − Ω ∞ =−∞ =−∞ + ⋅ + ∞ − =−∞ =−∞ =−∞ ⋅ ∞ =−∞                       ≤   ×              ≤    

∑ ∑

 ( ) ( )

( )

( )( )

( )

* 1 1 1 2 2 2 q n q q j k n

k j

C

δ α +

(11)

where

( )

( )

2 2 *

1 min

k

q k q

q

+

=

 , this implies that

( )( )

( )

, 1 1

11 1 q n

p

K

C C f α

η

η

≤ ≤

Finally, we estimate η13 by Lemma 3.7, we get

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

(

) ( )

( )

( )

3

2 2

2

2 2

3 2

2

, ,

2 2

1 1

2 1

2 2

, 1

2 d

p

p q

j

p

q q k

k k

j k j k

j k j k

k k

L L

q k

k

j k

n

k j k C

L

T f T f

C

x x y

f y y x y

α α

µ µ

α

µ

χ χ

η η

χ η

⋅ ⋅

∞ ∞

Ω Ω

= += +

=−∞ =−∞

∞ ∞

− =−∞ = +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ω −

 

 

 

(1.4)

Note that, when xCk, j≥ +k 2, then xy ~ x. Therefore, applying the generalized Hölder’s In- equality, we have

(

) ( )

( )

(

)

( )

1

1

, ,

d p

p j

j j j

n L n

C

L

x x y x x y

f y y f

x y µ x y µ

χ ⋅

′ ⋅

− −

Ω − Ω −

− −

Define the variable exponent

( )

( )

1 1

1 1 1

p′ ⋅ = +r p′ ⋅ by Lemma 3.3, then we have

(

) ( )

( )

(

)

( )

1

1 ,

d p , r

p j

j

j j

n L L n

C

L

x x y

f y y f x x y

x y µ x y µ

χ ⋅

′ ⋅

− −

Ω −

≤ Ω −

− −

(

) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

(

(

)

( )

)

( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

1

1 1

2

1

1 1

1 1

1 2

1

2 ,

d

2 d , d

2 2

2 2

j

j

p p n

j

n r n

p p

p p

j n C

r r

j n n

j L j L s

jn

j n r

j L j L L L S

jn

j n r

j L j L

x x y

f y y x y

C f r r x y y

C f

C f

µ

µ

µ

µ

χ σ

χ

χ ′

⋅ ⋅ −

∞ −

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

− − −

− −

× − −

Ω −

 

′ ′

≤  Ω 

 

 

≤ Ω

According Lemma 3.4 and the formula

( )

1

( )

1

1 1 1

p r

p′ ⋅ = ′ ⋅ − , we have 1( ) 1( )

1

p p

j j

r

B B j

L L B

χ

′⋅

χ

′⋅

≈ Then we get

(

) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

1 1

,

d 2 p j p

j

j n

j j B

n L L

C

x x y

f y y f

x y

µ

µ ⋅ χ ′ ⋅

− − −

Ω −

≤ −

(1.5)

From Equations (1.4), (1.5) and using Lemma 3.7, and

( )

( ) ( )

1

1 1

1 2

1 p q q j

j

L

f

α χ

η ⋅

 

  ≤

 

 

(12)

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

2

2 2

3 2

2 1

1

, 2

1

2 1

2

2 2

p q

p p

j k

p n q k

j k j k

k

L

q k j

j n k

B B

L L

k j k L

T f

f C

α

µ

µ α

χ

η

χ χ

η

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ′ ⋅

⋅ ∞

Ω ∞ = + =−∞

∞ ∞

− − =−∞ = +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note that

( ) ( )

2 2 1

p p

k k

k

B L C B L

µ

χ ⋅ ≤ − χ ⋅ see [9]. Then we have

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

2

2 2

3 2

1 1

1

3 2

1

1

1

, 2

1

2 1

2 1

2

2

2 2 2 2

2 2

2 2

p q

p p

j k

p n

p k p n

p j

q k

j k j k

k

L

q k

j

k j jn k

B B

L L

k j k L

q k

B j

j k

k L

k j k L

B L

k j n k

k j k

T f

f C

f C

C

α

µ

α µ µ

µ α

α

χ

η

χ χ

η

χ

η χ

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ′ ⋅

⋅ ∞

Ω ∞ = + =−∞

∞ ∞

− −

=−∞ = +

∞ ∞

− =−∞ = +

∞ ∞

− =−∞ = +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

3 2

2

1

3 2

1 1

2

1 1

1

1

2 1

2 2

p n

p q n

q k

j

L

q k

q q

j j k k j n

k j k

L

f

f C

δ µ

α δ µ α

η

χ η

+

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ∞ ∞

− − + =−∞ = +

 

 

 

 

 

   

   

 

 

 

∑ ∑

where

( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

2

2 2

2

2 2

, 2 2

1

3 2

, 2 2

1 2

, 1

2

, 1

p q

p q q k

j k j k

L q k

j k j k

L

T f q

q k

T f q

α

µ

α

µ

χ

η

χ

η

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ∞

Ω = + −

⋅ ∞

Ω = + +

 

 = 

  

  

   >

  

 

(13)

( )( )

( )

, 1 1

13 1 q n

p

K

C C f α

η

η

≤ ≤

This completes the proof Theorem 1. Proof of Theorem 2

Let b Lip

( )

n

β

, ( )1( )

( )

1

,q n p

fKα ⋅  . We write

( )

( )

k j

( )

j j

f x f x χ f x

∞ ∞

=−∞ =−∞

=

=

From definition of ( ),q( )

( )

n p

Kα ⋅ 

( )

( )( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

2

, 2

2 2

2

, ,

2 ,

, q n inf 0 : 1

p p

q

q

k m

k m

k K

k

L

b T f

b T f α

α

µ µ

χ

χ η

η ⋅

⋅ ⋅

=−∞

 

  = > ≤

 

 

Since

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2

2

2

,

2

, ,

21 22 23 21

1

, 1

22

2 ,

2 , 2 ,

2 ,

p q

p p

q q

p q q

k m

k

L

q q

k

k m k m

k k

j j

L L

q k

k m

k j k

L

b T f

b T f b T f

b T f

α

µ

α α

µ µ

α

µ

χ η

χ χ

η η η η

χ

η

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ Ω

⋅ ⋅

∞ −

Ω Ω

=−∞ =−∞

⋅ +

Ω = −

 

 

 

 

   

   

 

   

+ +

   

   

   

 

 

 

+  

 

 

 

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

2

2

2 2

, 2

23

2 ,

p q q

k m

k j k

L

b T f

α

µ χ

η

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ∞

Ω = +

 

 

 

+  

 

 

 

where

( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2

2

21 2 , ,

q p

k

k m

k j

k l L

b T f

α

µ

η χ

⋅ ⋅

∞ −

=−∞ =−∞

 

= 

 

( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2

1

22 ,

1

2 ,

q p

k

k m

k j k

k l L

b T f

α

µ

η χ

⋅ ⋅

∞ +

= − =−∞

 

= 

 

( )

( )

( )

( )

2 2

23 ,

2

2 ,

q p

k m

k j k

k l L

b T f

α

µ

η χ

⋅ ⋅

∞ ∞

= + =−∞

 

= 

 

And η η= 212223. The similar to prove of Theorem 1

( )

( )( )

( )

[

]

, 2 2

, 21 22 23

, q

n p m

k K

b T µ f χ α Cη C η η η

  ≤ ≤ + +

   

Hence

( )

( )( )

( )

, 1 1

21, 22, 23 n q n

p m

Lip K

C b f α β

η η η ⋅

. Denote

( )( )

( )

, 1 1

1 q n

p

K

f α

η

=

First we estimate η22. Note that bm,T,µ is bonuded on ( )

( )

p n

References

Related documents

The present work describes the development of a sensitive, reproducible, and accurate method using liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detector for simultaneous

Brazil is able to achieve a large- scale promotion of social housing, including real estate companies and with positive effects on the economy of the

In this research, three linear (ordinary, simple, and universal kriging) and three nonlinear (indicator, probability, and disjunctive kriging) algorithms, were

The standard definition by the 2OECD- DAC explains &#34;Foreign aid (or the equivalent term, foreign assistance) as financial flows, technical assistance, and

This interpretation is based on five key observations: (1) in contrast to the complete intracellular C-terminal tail, a construct lacking the G-protein binding domain (GBD) is unable

but unfortunately distancing itself from the discussion proposed in this article on Ecology in Health, where we propose a responsible discussion of the need to create

was induced in rats by administering CCl 4 subcutaneously (s. of each animal. Biochemical parameters like, SGOT, SGPT, SALP and serum bilirubin level were analysed. A

Kerala is the south Indian state with a high burden of cardiovascular disease (Kutty V.R et al, 1993) and there is no significant difference in the prevalence of