• No results found

The CMO CIO disconnect

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The CMO CIO disconnect"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The CMO–CIO disconnect

Bridging the gap to seize

the digital opportunity

(2)

As a result, chief marketing officers (CMOs) and chief information officers (CIOs) must work more closely together than ever before.

For CMOs, consumers’ expectations for relevant experiences are having the longest- term impact on marketing strategy, according to recent Accenture research.1 For CIOs, technology is finally able to deliver relevance at scale and treat buyers like individuals, thanks to data analytics, integrated marketing platforms and multichannel delivery systems.

Right partners, wrong perceptions

In fact, marketing is so inextricably linked to technology that by 2017, CMOs are projected to spend more money on information technology and analytics than CIOs,2 a remarkable development considering that CMOs regard digital orientation as their weakest capability—at the exact moment when it needs to be their strongest.

To overcome this gap and infuse a digital focus in all business processes and functions, there is no more important a function for marketing to align with than information technology. On the surface, CMOs and CIOs seem to agree. Dig deeper, though, and CIOs feel a greater need for alignment. Nearly eight out of 10 agree that alignment is needed, compared to just over half of CMOs.

Worse, only one in 10 marketing and IT executives say collaboration is at the right level. Despite their growing understanding that they must be more closely aligned, CMOs and CIOs have a trust issue. Both functions

focus on building other C-suite relationships before investing in the marketing-IT relationship. As a result, the two functions are disconnected in how technology should support and enable improved marketing performance.

Notably, CMOs expect much quicker turnaround and higher quality from IT, with a greater degree of flexibility in responding to market requirements. CMOs view the CIO organization as an execution and delivery arm at a time when they should consider IT as a strategic partner and involve CIOs when planning new marketing investments.

The two functions need to work together to educate and bring their C-suite colleagues along on the path of digital integration. As the vice president of IT at a US bank put it,

“A cohesive approach to digital requires 100% platform engagement across all LOBs to deliver a unified experience.”

It is no exaggeration to say that every business is a digital business.

Technology, along with data, analytics and design, underpins and shapes the entire customer experience. Information technology is not only pervasive; it is fast becoming a primary driver of market differentiation, business growth and profitability.

1 Turbulence for the CMO: Charting a path for the seamless customer experience, Accenture, April 2013.

2 http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&

objID=202&mode=2&PageID=5553&ref=webinar-

(3)

These are the findings from the 2012 Accenture Interactive CMO-CIO Insights survey of more than 400 senior marketing executives and 250 senior IT executives across 10 countries.

Based on their responses, five imperatives emerge to build trust and improve alignment between the CMO and CIO functions:

Five imperatives to improve marketing and IT performance

Identify the CMO as the chief experience officer (CXO).

Accept IT as a strategic partner with marketing, not just as a platform provider.

Agree on key business levers for marketing and IT alignment, such as access to customer data vs. privacy and security.

Change the skill mix to ensure that both organizations are more marketing- and tech-savvy.

Develop trust by doing just that—trusting.

As consumers head full speed into a world where brand and technological experiences are indistinguishable, revamped marketing and IT organizations need to be jointly responsible for owning the design of the customer experience. Data insights, technology and creative strategy must unite to orchestrate experiences across channels and business units. With a platform of trust and transparency, powered by analytics and technology, CMOs and CIOs will be able to seize the digital opportunity and provide the relevant and seamless experiences their customers demand.

1 2

3

4

5

(4)

No, there’s no need for alignment Yes

CMO+CIO

CMO

CIO

64 36

56 44

77 23

The beliefs of CMOs and CIOs often diverge radically. A large majority of CIOs (61%) feels their companies are prepared for the digital future.

CMOs are more hesitant, with just under a majority (49%) feeling their companies are prepared to leverage digital channels.

Even in their concerns for the future, however, they don’t share the same reasons for feeling unprepared. The top concern of CMOs (43%) is insufficient funding for digital marketing channels. When digital platforms are funded and built, organizations also must fund the right mix of skills and resources to leverage platforms successfully. Platform development does not always equate to full use when capabilities are inadequately funded.

Split from the start

The chief concerns of CIOs (50%) are solution complexity and integration difficulties. In a fragmented cloud services world, CIOs are challenged by what it means to have infrastructure.

In another example, both functions agree on the need for greater collaboration, but further digging reveals a much different picture. Globally, 77% of CIOs agree they need to be aligned with CMOs, whereas only 56% of CMOs feel this way about CIOs (Figure 1). CMOs are beginning to see alternative ways to buy technology capabilities wrapped by services, such as partnering with outside vendors rather than with the CIO.

Marketers want more freedom from IT, and IT wants more planning and compliance with standards (Figure 2). Some 45% of CMOs say they want to enable their employees to access and use data and content without IT intervention. Some 49% of CIOs counter that marketing pulls in technologies without consideration for IT standards.

This is the crux of the issue: who operates the technology to drive outcomes, who controls the design of experiences.

Figure 1: Need for Marketing/IT alignment (%)

(5)

Top 2

2 3 5

6 9

10

10 12

9 13

18 13

14 18

17

16 19

38 38

32 36

38 35 35 36 38

34 32 36

38 36 34 33 28

29 28 31

28 26 25 25

13 10 11 12 11 10 11 7 8 9 10 10

51 46 45 45 39 39 39 38 36 35 35 35 CIO understands marketing requirements

Marketing employees understand IT

IT employees understand marketing programs Want to enable marketing employees to operate data, content, without IT intervention

IT development process is slow and not aligned to the speed of digital marketing

Marketing makes promises without agreement from IT

The technology is siloed and too difficult to use to craft cross-channel experience

IT department prefers to build but not integrate best-in-class technologies

Don’t have control of the technology choices made by IT counterparts

Prefer to buy technology as a service and not rely as much on IT

IT deliverables fall short of expectations IT team does not understand urgency of data integration

9

10 18

16 17

9 17

Top 2

14 30 40 25 65

Software service needs careful planning

6 15

17

34

31

33

33

33

32

3 6 36 38 17

3 16 31 35 15

6 15 29 35 14

15

7 14 31 31 16

13

5 13 39 33 9

10

55 50 49 48 48 47 46 42 42 40 CMO understands company’s IT infrastructure

IT employees understand marketing programs Marketing pulls in technologies without consideration for IT standards

Marketing understands technology

Marketing requirements and priorities change too often

Strongly disagree Strongly agree Marketing makes promises without agreement

from IT

Marketing team lacks understanding of data integration

Marketing teams don’t have IT skills Marketing does not provide adequate level of business requirements

Due to complexity there are multiple platforms to manage cross-channel experiences

3

37 28 12

6 18

10 15

32 32 15

6 16

CMO Frustrations

CIO Frustrations

Figure 2: Frustrations on both sides (%)

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

(6)

Surprisingly, the CEO is not the most important relationship for CMOs or CIOs. The most important relationship for CIOs is with the CFO; for CMOs, it’s with the chief sales officer (CSO). The finance organization is only the fifth most important C-suite group for CMOs (out of eight). CMOs may want to improve their relationships with CFOs, not only as an influencer on CIOs but also as marketing ROI becomes even more critical to demonstrate.

In one bright spot, both CMOs and CIOs believe their relationship with each other has improved over the past year. Some 45% of marketing executives believe their relationship with the IT organization has

Short-circuiting in the C-suite

While CMOs appear not to be as collaboratively inclined as CIOs, they actually place greater value on their CIO relationships. CMOs rank CIOs as the second most important C-suite relationship, while CIOs rank CMOs

#4 (Figure 3).

improved the most over other C-suite functions. A nearly equal proportion of IT executives (47%) says their relationship with marketing has improved but not as much as with five other C-suite functions (business units/geographies, CFO, COO, sales and procurement).

Across the board, however, only about one in 10 executives say C-suite collaboration is at the right level (Figure 4). While an almost equal number of CMOs (41%) and CIOs (42%) feel that much more collaboration is required with each other, CIOs feel more collaboration is required with business units and the sales organization at the expense of marketing. In contrast, CMOs feel they need to work much more with the CIO compared to any other C-suite organization.

Discrepancies like these occur when too few people take the customer view. Instead, the customer journey is force-fit into artificial sections that contract the seamless, non-stop journey that customers naturally take.

“I think we could better integrate or unify by understanding the strategies, goals and needs of the other and then collaborating to align our objectives.”

Director of Marketing, Fortune 500 US insurance company

(7)

8 27 40 25

9 34 38 19

13 32 33 21

14 32 37 17

15 35 35 16

19 36 31 15

With CSO/Sales organization

With CIO/IT organization

With business units/geographies

With CEO/Board of directors

With CFO/Finance organization

With CCS/Service organization

With COO/Manufacturing-production

With CPO/Procurement organization 19 37 30 14

12 31 34 23

6 16 44 33

6 20 45 29

8 19 38 35

7

7 25 35 34

10 23 37 31

14 21 35 30

With CFO/Finance organization

With business units/geographies

With CSO/Sales organization

With CMO/Marketing organization

With CEO/Board of directors

With CCS/Service organization

With COO/Manufacturing-production

With CPO/Procurement organization 12 25 36 27

21 39 33

Not important Extremely important CIOs rank CMOs as the fourth most important C-suite relationship Figure 3: Importance of working with the C-suite (%)

CMO

CIO

Not important Extremely important CMOs rank CIOs as the second most important C-suite relationship

(8)

Figure 4: Need for collaboration across the C-suite (%)

35 37

33 37

35 36

32

11 33 27 10

19 29 26 11

13 34 23 13

14 34 26 9

14 32 25 10

12 36 24 9

With business units/geographies

With CEO

With CSO

With CCS

With CPO

With COO

With CFO 15 35 25 7

Top 2

With CIO 13

19

16

17

17

19

19

18

17 28 29 12 41

27 33 14 47

40 42

38 43

39

37

14 26 28 15

16 26 30 12

15 31 27 13

16 26 27 12

14 32 25 13

With CSO

With CFO

With CMO

With CCS

With CEO

With COO

With CPO 16 30 25 12

With business units/geographies 12

17

16

20

15

18

16

17 15

28 31 11 42

11

Amount of collaboration at the right level Much more collaboration is needed

Top 2

CIO CMO

Amount of collaboration at the right level Much more collaboration is needed 41% of CMOs feel more collaboration is required with each other

42% of CIOs feel more collaboration is required with each other

(9)
(10)

With collaboration in short supply, it’s little wonder that CMOs and CIOs disagree on why marketing and IT should be aligned.

In particular there are fundamental disagreements over accessing, using and securing customer data as a competitive advantage.

Marketing strategy is increasingly focused on how to leverage Big Data. Turning this data into relevant customer experiences at scale is a far cry from past capabilities focused on creative and brand strategies. These new services require a new kind of rigor and a deep technology backbone to enable them.

Not surprisingly, then, marketing’s #1 driver (out of 15) for aligning and interacting with IT is access to customer insight and intelligence, but that driver ranks #10 for CIOs. A typical IT concern—for privacy and security around customer data and brand protection—ranks #4 for CIOs but #11 for CMOs. CIOs rank IT’s strategic capability as the #5 reason for alignment, while CMOs see IT as more of a platform provider, which they rank as the #9 driver.

Clashing on collaboration

Essentially, CMOs view the CIO organization as an execution and delivery arm, not as a driver of marketing strategy and excellence and a partner to be considered on equal footing. CMOs expect much quicker turnaround and higher quality from IT, with a greater degree of flexibility in responding to market requirements.

Nearly five in 10 CIOs say that marketing makes promises without agreement from IT, while only four in 10 marketers agree with that assertion. Some 36% of CMOs say that IT deliverables fall short of their expectations, while 46% of CIOs respond that marketing does not provide an adequate level of business requirements.

Voicing basic frustrations

(11)
(12)

Unsurprisingly, CIOs are not aligned with CMOs on marketing priorities (Figure 6). This makes it difficult to collaborate on common goals—much less achieve them—when the partners don’t know each other’s priorities.

Marketing and IT executives agree that gaining better customer insight and reaching the market more efficiently must be at the top of the CMO’s agenda as it relates to technology adoption and usage. But IT executives see tying analytics to business outcomes as more important (45% of CIOs vs. 33% of CMOs), while marketers value lead generation more highly (43% of CMOs vs. 35% of CIOs). More CMOs than CIOs also think it’s more important to improve marketing productivity and performance (44% vs. 36%).

CMO+CIO

CMO

CIO

16 39 32 7

6

18 41

36

45

29 7

5

12 37 37 8

7

At the bottom At the top Figure 5: Marketing IT vs. IT priorities (%)

Disagreeing on priorities

CMOs and CIOs have an obvious trust issue. Nearly half (45%) of CIOs report that they put marketing IT near or at the top of their priorities (Figure 5), whereas 64% of CMOs think marketing IT is placed at the bottom of the CIO’s priority list.

Nor are CMOs aligned with CIOs on IT priorities (Figure 7). Large differences exist in appreciating marketing platforms, social media and campaign management as priorities. CIOs typically want to measure results to optimize campaigns. CMOs want to generate leads and sales. Because they are not marching to a common purpose, collaboration cannot occur.

Some other examples of misaligned IT priorities:

The CIO’s #1 priority is advancing platforms to aid in marketing measurement and campaign optimization. That ranks #8 out of 16 priorities for CMOs. The CMO’s

#1 priority is deploying better marketing execution and operational systems and platforms. That ranks #6 for CIOs. Some 30% of CIOs want to further the use of social media and online listening and contact systems; only 24% of CMOs do.

Some 26% of CIOs want to introduce closed-loop campaign measurement and tracking capabilities; only 19% of CMOs do.

Though they agree on how technology can improve access to and leveraging of customer data, there is a surprising lack of integration across online and offline channels. A comprehensive view of the customer requires understanding all aspects of their purchasing journey to serve them with the right messages and offers in the right channels at the right time. This integrated view needs strong analytics, insights and feedback loops so that customer data can be continually refined and results improved. This is the holy grail for marketers, yet only one quarter of CMOs and CIOs have completely integrated customer data, while four in 10 are struggling.

(13)

Figure 6: CIOs are not aligned with CMOs on marketing priorities (%)

Gaining better customer insight, competitive intelligence and market knowledge

Delivering more qualified leads and opportunities to the sales organization

Improving the yield and return of marketing campaigns through digital channels

Tying website and digital engagement analytics to business outcomes and transactions Reducing selling cycles and generating higher value deals

Reaching and engaging with the market more efficiently and effectively

Integrating and extracting more value out of disparate and siloed customer databases

Adding more engaging and interactive features to company and brand websites Getting smarter about using social media and digital marketing systems

Ensuring brand assets are more accessible and better managed globally

Knowing more about website utilization and visitor behavior

Improving marketing group productivity, performance and compliance

54

43 44

40

33 37

51

41

39 44

40

34 16

8 7

7

7 7

15

8

6 7

7

5

Gaining better customer insight, competitive intelligence and market knowledge

Delivering more qualified leads and opportunities to the sales organization

Improving the yield and return of marketing campaigns through digital channels

Tying website and digital engagement analytics to business outcomes and transactions Reducing selling cycles and generating higher value deals

Reaching and engaging with the market more efficiently and effectively

Integrating and extracting more value out of disparate and siloed customer databases

Adding more engaging and interactive features to company and brand websites Getting smarter about using social media and digital marketing systems

Ensuring brand assets are more accessible and better managed globally

Knowing more about website utilization and visitor behavior

Improving marketing group productivity, performance and compliance

CIO - Top 1 CIO - Within top 5

51

35 36

45 36

53

42 42

40 43

42

34 14

7 7

5

10 6

12

9

8 8

9

5

CMO Priorities

CIO Priorities

Indicates 6 point or more difference between CMO and CIO priorities CMO - Top 1 CMO - Within top 5 Indicates 6 point or more difference between CMO and CIO priorities

(14)

Figure 7: CMOs are not aligned with CIOs on IT priorities (%)

32

36

35

24 32

26

37 37

38

32

19

35

32

33 31

21 Advancing platforms to aid in marketing measurement and campaign optimization

Improving the links and interactions between Marketing, Sales and channel groups

Delivering more timely and relevant transactional, behavioral and customer profile data

Furthering the use of social media and online listening and contact systems

Making key websites more valuable and useful at capturing and converting customers

Scaling and safeguarding business websites and customer data repositories Reducing technology costs

Deploying better marketing execution and operational systems and platforms

Increasing the use and value of CRM systems by both Marketing and Sales

Introducing closed-loop campaign measurement and tracking capabilities Safeguarding and protecting customer data, brand assets and trademarks

Managing Big Data

Piloting new ways to engage the market using mobile, Internet and P-O-S technologies Assuring the integrity and availability of back-end infrastructures and interfaces

Advancing email deliverability, list quality and recipient response

Automating customer interactions and improving customer care and handling

7

7 6

6

5 8

4 9

7

7

2 8

9

5 5

4

Indicates 6 point or more difference between CMO and CIO priorities

CMO

37

30 37

32

26 Furthering the use of social media and online listening and contact systems

Deploying better marketing execution and operational systems and platforms

Introducing closed-loop campaign measurement and tracking capabilities

7 10

2

38

33

32

31

25

32 34

32

30 30

20 Advancing platforms to aid in marketing measurement and campaign optimization

Improving the links and interactions between Marketing, Sales and channel groups

Delivering more timely and relevant transactional, behavioral and customer profile data

Making key websites more valuable and useful at capturing and converting customers

Scaling and safeguarding business websites and customer data repositories Reducing technology costs

Increasing the use and value of CRM systems by both Marketing and Sales Safeguarding and protecting customer data, brand assets and trademarks

Managing Big Data

Piloting new ways to engage the market using mobile, Internet and P-O-S technologies Assuring the integrity and availability of back-end infrastructures and interfaces

Advancing email deliverability, list quality and recipient response

Automating customer interactions and improving customer care and handling

3

8 4

6

7

3 8

9 9

6

5 7

4

CIO

CIO - Top 1 CIO - Within top 5

CMO - Top 1

(15)
(16)

While their beliefs differ in many cases, chief marketers and IT executives have at least one thing in common: an equal number (36%) of CMOs and CIOs face challenges in implementing solutions to improve marketing effectiveness. Leading the list of internal obstacles are solution complexity and integration for both CMOs (47%) and CIOs (42%).

Facing common internal obstacles

Other internal obstacles point to the need to improve trust and transparency between the two functions (Figure 8). More than three in 10 CMOs feel that IT keeps marketing out of the loop, doesn’t make the marketing function a priority and doesn’t make time and technical resources available. For their part, more than three in 10 CIOs agree that they keep marketing out of the loop and don’t provide the time and technical resources to help. They also believe that marketing bypasses IT to work directly with vendors.

(17)

Internal obstacles faced by CMOs in implementing solutions to further marketing effectiveness

Solution complexity and integration difficulties 47

Lack of expertise and knowledge in IT organization 28

Marketing function not a priority for IT department 35

Marketing resources taking control and isolating IT 27

IT resistance and opposition to solution sourcing 19

IT keeping Marketing out of the loop 38

Insufficient budget and funding for the project 28

No management mandate to push the project forward 20

Time and technical resources not available to help 31

Marketing bypassing IT and working directly with the vendor 21

Wrong solution that was not embraced by users 9

Internal obstacles faced by CIOs in implementing IT projects to further marketing effectiveness

Solution complexity and integration difficulties 42

Lack of expertise and knowledge in IT organization 31

Time and technical resources not available to help 35

Marketing resources taking control and isolating IT 29

IT resistance and opposition to solution sourcing 15

Marketing bypassing IT and working directly with the vendor 36

Insufficient budget and funding for the project 30

No management mandate to push the project forward 20

IT keeping Marketing out of the loop 33

Marketing function not a priority for IT department 25

Wrong solution that was not embraced by users 13

Figure 8: Internal obstacles to improving marketing effectiveness (%)

(18)

Closing the trust gap

Identify the CMO as the chief experience officer (CXO). CMOs must take responsibility for the consumer experience and

drive consumer-centric measures. By understanding the drivers of a connected customer experience across channels, including strategic requirements (such as flexible user interfaces and a unified view of consumer data) and critical enablers (such as technology platforms and operating models), the CXO plays an important role in making the multichannel strategy an integral part of a company’s business strategy. CIOs and other members of the C-suite should be jointly responsible for driving business outcomes from effective experiences and for building closer relationships with CMOs in the process.

Accept IT as a strategic partner with marketing. When planning new marketing investments, marketers should not view IT as just a delivery platform. Both functions should work together to understand what systemic changes in their operating model need to occur to allow them to take advantage of new technologies rapidly while reducing cost and complexity.

Agree on key business levers for marketing and IT integration, such as access to customer data vs. privacy and security. Alignment should be prominent in the agendas and investment plans for each function. Already more than one-third of CMOs and CIOs spend over 30% of their budgets on technology-enabled marketing, so it’s clearly important to both functions.

Moreover, budgets are sizeable. About one in three marketers globally and two in five IT executives say their budgets are more than $500 million.

To harness the power of technology and analytics, CIOs and CMOs and their C-suite colleagues need to be laser-focused on crafting the most relevant consumer experiences. They should embrace tools, processes and platforms to unlock consumer intent—while maintaining privacy and security—as the key to delivering consistent and relevant customer experiences across channels. Together they should manage, measure and optimize marketing investments, resources and campaigns. Sitting within their own silos with independent perspectives will only continue the downward trend in business success.

To improve their working relationship, five imperatives should take hold to build trust and improve alignment between the CMO and CIO functions:

1 2 3

“Dotted-line reporting of marketing into IT and vice versa...”

VP of Marketing, Fortune 100 UK insurance company

(19)

“ This requires a top-down setting of priorities starting with CEO expectations and calibrating with all verticals. For example, including key IT employees in marketing meetings, sales conventions, etc., would give them more context to their work and better appreciation for timelines. There could be some reciprocity here with key marketing employees appropriately involved with IT work.”

VP of IT, US retail company

Change the skill mix to ensure that the marketing organization becomes more tech savvy and the IT organization becomes more agile and responsive to market demands.

CMOs should empower their teams to drive technology decisions and become savvy about digital technology architecture, collaborating with their technology counterparts to serve the demands of the digital age. The vice president of IT for a US telecom company suggested more cross- training to better understand the needs of both functions. The IT vice president at a US retailer recommended “blended skills, not marketing and separate IT but rather a team where each person has a combination of both.”

Develop trust by doing just that—trusting.

The only way to build trust is just to do it. Successful marketing depends on it.

Consumers don’t have the time or interest for the inefficiencies and mishaps that arise when marketing and IT work at cross purposes. Consumers can take their business elsewhere—and they will. CMOs and CIOs must open the floodgates of communication, pollinate cross-disciplinary teams of marketing and IT pros and welcome each other in the C-suite.

4 5

(20)

Seizing the digital opportunity

They need to work together to educate and bring their C-suite colleagues along on the path of digital integration. As the vice president of IT at a US bank put it,

“A cohesive approach to digital requires 100% platform engagement across all LOBs to deliver a unified experience.” The vice president of marketing at a US high-tech firm went one step further, recommending an “executive mandate and metrics aligned with organizational objectives.”

Despite their contrasting views in many areas, CMOs and CIOs are not far apart in agreeing that reaching and engaging the market has become more technology driven, with technology now underpinning and shaping the entire customer experience.

As consumers head full speed into a world where brand and technological experiences are indistinguishable, revamped marketing and IT organizations need to be jointly responsible for owning the design of the customer experience. Data insights, technology and creative strategy must unite to orchestrate experiences across channels and business units. With a platform of trust and transparency, powered by analytics and technology, CMOs and CIOs will be able to seize the digital opportunity and provide the relevant and seamless experiences their customers demand.

“A cohesive approach to digital requires 100% platform engagement across all LOBs to deliver a unified experience.”

Vice President of IT, US high-tech firm

(21)

About the research

The 2012 CMO-CIO Insights survey, sponsored by Accenture Interactive, aims to understand the opinions, challenges and points of view of senior marketing and IT executives as they relate to marketing and IT alignment.

Results are based on online surveys across 10 countries with 405 senior marketing executives who are key marketing decision makers in their companies. Results from IT executives are based on 252 surveys across the same countries, using the same screening criteria.

Most companies have at least US$1 billion in annual revenues. Corporations in France, Australia, Singapore and Brazil have annual revenues of at least US$500 million.

Nearly half (48%) the companies experienced flat or little growth in 2012. Another 36%

showed significant growth, while the remainder (16%) had negative growth.

Business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-to- business-to-consumer (B2B2C) corporations represented the most prevalent business models for both CMOs and CIOs, at about 40% each, with business-to-business companies making up the remainder. Financial services represented the biggest sector (35%

for CMOs, 37% for CIOs), with products companies close behind (31% for CMOs, 29%

for CIOs). Communications, high-technology and media companies represented 17%

for CMOs and 18% for CIOs. Resources companies made up 8% for CMOs and 5% for CIOs. A variety of other companies represented 9% for CMOs and 10% for CIOs.

Some 45% of CMO respondents were based in Europe, Africa and Latin America (EALA).

Another 40% were located in North America, while 15% were headquartered in Asia-Pacific (APAC). EALA also represented the largest geographic contingency of CIOs (43%), followed by North America (40%) and APAC (17%).

Authors

Brian Whipple

Brian Whipple is Managing Director of Accenture Interactive, a business of Accenture that helps companies develop industry-leading digital marketing capabilities, including the development and management of websites and interactive marketing, as well as the optimization of online and offline marketing and merchandising investments.

Brian leads all of Accenture Interactive’s global consulting domains including Digital, Marketing Analytics, Media Management, Marketing Data Management and Marketing Transformation. Prior to Accenture, Brian was Chief Operating Officer of Hill Holliday, an advertising and marketing services firm headquartered in Boston.

[email protected] Baiju Shah

Baiju Shah is Managing Director for Strategy

& Innovation in Accenture Interactive. In this role, he oversees Accenture Interactive’s business strategy and manages a portfolio of emerging business services. He is responsible for identifying and catalyzing new waves of growth by creating new business services that address unmet needs in the ever- evolving marketing landscape. He has worked closely with clients across industries including Verizon, Chrysler and P&G on strategies that take advantage of emerging technology and analytics as a competitive advantage in Digital. Baiju’s expertise lies in digital marketing, advanced analytics, and technology market adoption.

[email protected]

(22)

Copyright © 2013 Accenture All rights reserved.

Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture.

Accenture Interactive helps the world’s leading brands drive superior marketing performance across the full multichannel customer experience. Working with over 5,000 Accenture professionals dedicated to serving the marketing function, Accenture Interactive offers integrated, industrialized and industry-driven digital transformation and marketing solutions. Follow @AccentureSocial or visit accenture.com/interactive.

About Accenture

Accenture is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company, with approximately 266,000 people serving clients in more than 120 countries.

Combining unparalleled experience, comprehensive capabilities across all industries and business functions, and extensive research on the world’s most successful companies, Accenture collaborates with clients to help them become high-performance businesses and governments. The company generated net revenues of US$27.9 billion for the fiscal year ended Aug. 31, 2012. Its home page is www.accenture.com.

The views and opinions in this article should not be viewed as professional advice with respect to your business.

Disclaimer: Accenture’s CMO Insights survey uses the generic term “partner” to refer to entities such as digital agencies, specialized agencies, marketing service providers, advertising agencies, management consultants, systems integrators and public relations firms. The use of the term “partner” in the survey, the survey results, and in this

References

Related documents

1) If Customer’s account equity reaches minimum margin level specified by Company in section 1.6 of these Terms (minimum margin level is 30% for all accounts opened since July

10th Floor, Wisma Genting, Jalan Sultan Ismail, 50250 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The lower increase in pre-tax profit was reflective of the upward cost pressure arising from higher

physicochemistry of the different bacteria.. % Ag coupons demonstrating the different patterns of retained bacteria on each of the test substrates.. Retention assays performed

The fact that conventional arbitration decisions typically lie near the average of the parties' final positions provides at least some empirical support for this view, although

Significance of this thesis in relation to both Theming and Georgian Dublin At the level of theory this thesis is significant in three ways: (1) by pointing out contradictions

We propose that high NFC individuals with more cognitive resources, as opposed to low NFC individuals, are more likely to activate persuasion knowledge when exposed to

Using these estimators we construct likelihood ratio statistics to test for a common cointegration rank across the individual vector error correction models, both with heterogeneous

From the coverage plots for the DeNovoRL assembly (Chapter2; Gómez-Rodríguez et al. 2015) and BorneoCanopy (Chapter 3) it is clear that the re-assembly process has not